Two-step confirmation of Transfer order in WM

Hi
We are confirguring 2 step confirmation.
We have activated 2step conf, for the warehouse & marked corfirmation mandatory for the storage types,
However we are not able to perform confirmation for Pick & Transfer step.
Please let us know on how to configure two step confirmation.
Thanks,

Hello Abhay Desai,
Please kindly refer to SAP Library which has provided the following documentation on 2-step picking:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
I would suggest you to go through the prerequisites and steps in 2-steps pikcing in the given documentation. You should also be able to access to above with the following path:
http://help.sap.com >> SAP Library
--> SAP ERP Central Component
       --> Logistics
            --> Logistic Execution
                 --> Warehouse Management System
                      --> Goods Issue
                           --> Two Step Picking.
Hope the above helps. If question answered, please close and reward points. Otherwise feel free to get back.

Similar Messages

WM - Two step confirmation cancellation

Hi Gurus,
I am using the two step confirmation for transfer order in one of my business process (no 2 step picking).
This is a necessary requirement from my client, but I have a little issue with the cancellation. Once the first step is confirmed, all the cancellation transactions issue the error message #L3355.
Physically, the forklift driver should be able to confirm the first step of picking, and also to cancel this first step. However, there seems not to be a standard transaction to cover this "normal" requirement.
Does anyone has an idea on how this process could be carried out in the system ?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Remi

If you check the code in...
include: ML03TF90_STORNO_PRUEFEN
form: STORNO_PRUEFEN
...you will see that this is the standard behaviour of the system. SAP online help also says:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f83e744afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
If a transfer order has already been confirmed, the only way to change a goods movement to restore the original stock situation is to create a new transfer order.
So, in standard system you have to create a new TO or you have to go to development / modification of standard code.
(one )
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Apr 6, 2011 6:35 PM

Two step confirmation with RF device (Mobile Data Entry) - 1st step only

Hello
I want to implement the following scenario:
- WM transfer orders are created, relevant for two step confirmation;
- a user working with RF device confirms the 1st step - picking;
- then the materials are transported physically to another building (the same warehouse number);
- another user working with RF device confirms the 2nd step - putaway.
For confirming the 1st step I tried to use standard transaction LM07. Confirmation of the 1st step is working fine but right after that a screen for confirming the 2nd step is displayed to the user. I would like this transaction to finish just after confirming the 1st step and not to proceed with the 2nd step immediately - because the confirmation of the 2nd step should be done by another user (with some other transaction).
What is more: if you exit the transaction manually after confirming the 1st step the system saves the TO number (in table LRF_WKQU) and in some circumstances triggers the screen for confirming the 2nd step even if you do not run LM07 - this is so called "recovery" function which is a nuisance in my case.
So my question is: is there a way to customize LM07 so that it finished processing automatically right after confirming the 1st step for a two step confirmation TO ? (and without storing data for "recovery" function). Or maybe some other mobile-data-entry transaction should be used for that ?
regards

Hi Vlad,
One more information, which i would like to communicate on this issue.
We have raised OSS message to SAP on this issue. They have replied back that, on screen 1302, we have some custom code which is interfering with the system behavior.
As of now, we have analyzed at our end, and we found that, the enhancement at screen 1302 is restricted for the functionality, and in theory, this enhancement should not be effecting at all the system behavior.
SAP has suggested to test the scenario , without any enhancement on screen 1302.
Still we are in discussion with SAP, and try to find out the resolution.
Can you also check in your system, if you have any enhancement on screen 1302 ? And if yes, does it interfering with the stander SAP codes.
Thanks & Regards,
Raj.

LE-TRM: Two-step confirmation

Dear all,
Could you please provide a link to a SAP documentation which stipulates that Two-step confirmation settings (SPRO > Logistics Execution > Warehouse Management > Activities > Confirmation > Confirmation control for Warehouse number / Storage type / Movement type) are mandatory in order to have TRM tasks created?
Thx a lot in advance

Hi Sandeepan,
Can you please check the two settings in tcode OMLX (Path:IMG u2192 Logistics Execution u2192 Warehouse Management u2192 Activities u2192Confirmation) The first of these is the requirement to confirm the pick and placement of a transfer order separately and the second is the requirement to confirm placement and removal of stock into and out of a storage type. For the second setting, by default, the requirement to confirm is switched off in interim storage types.
Other than above setting you need to check which mode is considered to find the rout till destination bin of the TO.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Sudhir

TO two step confirmation - return transfers

Hello,
I have set two step confirmation for OT and everything seems ok. I used LT1D for the picking confirmation and LT1E for positioning confirmation. The problems is when in the OT there is a return transfer to a storage type. For example
200 picked from strorage type A
100 positioned in storage type B
100 positioned in storage type R
R is the return storage type (set in customizing for the A storage type in picking strategy section)
In this case the two step confirmation doesn't work. SAP gives the message that two step confirmation is not allowed. I can only confirm with LT12 that is in a single step.
I haven't found any SAP notes for this topic, can someone help me please?
Thank you very much.
Bye Bye,
Andrea

Hi Vlad,
One more information, which i would like to communicate on this issue.
We have raised OSS message to SAP on this issue. They have replied back that, on screen 1302, we have some custom code which is interfering with the system behavior.
As of now, we have analyzed at our end, and we found that, the enhancement at screen 1302 is restricted for the functionality, and in theory, this enhancement should not be effecting at all the system behavior.
SAP has suggested to test the scenario , without any enhancement on screen 1302.
Still we are in discussion with SAP, and try to find out the resolution.
Can you also check in your system, if you have any enhancement on screen 1302 ? And if yes, does it interfering with the stander SAP codes.
Thanks & Regards,
Raj.

Two step confirmation for warehouse tasks in EWM

Hello everybody,
I am working on an internal prototyp to evaluate SAP EWM. Therefore it is essential that we use "two step confirmation" for warehouse tasks. Step one: confirm pick up of a pallet; Step two: confirm transportation of a pallet. Like it is used in SAP WM (Parameter I_QUKNZ in function module L_TO_CONFIRM and in standard SAP).
I haven't found anything similar to that in EWM so far. I searched in the official EWM SAP Press book and also in google. But right no I don't have any idea.
Do you guys have any hints on how to achieve two step confirmation somehow?
Many thanks in advance!
Stef

Hi Jürgen.
Thanks for your input! You are right, it works with RF!
But it works kind of strange. Deleting source storage bin, creating another position etc.
I will have a look how to adapt this.
Thanks!

Auto Confirmation of transfer order - 999 mvt from storage type W01 to S01

Hi,
I am trying to automate the confirmation of transfer orders between storage type W01 and S01 using a 999 movement type. The 999 movement type appears to work perfectly when doing a bin to bin movement within the W01 storage type (for example move batch abc from bin 01 to bin 02) no confirmations are required. However if I transfer from a bin in W01 storage type to the S01 storage type (which only has a single bin to represent a staging area) a manual confirmation of the transfer order is required via lt24 or lt12. It appears therefore that the issue is with the storage type S01 for this particular Warehouse. The setting to confirm the TO immediately is already activated for movt 999 in customizing, is there a setting for the storage type that must be defined.
Regards,

F1 help for field V_T333-SQUIT:
Means that the transfer order item can be confirmed immediately during the creation procedure.
SAP online help:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
To set the confirmation requirement for foreground processing, select the indicator for TO item can be confirmed immediately.
As per my understanding the immediate confirmation indicator does not mean that the transfer order will be confirmed immediately. It makes possible that during the creation of transfer order you CAN put a flag in the confirmation checkbox.
If you use it together with "propose confirmation" flag (setting for WM movement type; V_T333-VQUIT), the falg in confirmation check box will be populated automatically during TO creation.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 10, 2011 11:22 AM

Two step confirmation in Warehouse

Hi All,
Two step confirmation (We can use this indicator to define whether confirmation of the withdrawal of materials from a storage bin and arrival of materials at the target storage bin is allowed in the warehouse in two steps) indicator has been set for my warehouse.
As the two step confirmation is becoming heavy for the warehouse team, that need to be changed as a single step confirmation.
Will there be any impact on open TOs if i change this from two step to single step confirmation. Will there be any other impacts on warehouse environment.
Rgds
Raul

My suspicion would be that the configuration settings are referenced during TO creation and that TOs are then 'locked' with these settings. So the impact would not be significant, all existing TOs, just created or part processed would need to be completed using 2-step and that new ones would be single step.
Why not just trial it in your development system. Possibly all TOs just become single confirmation and the pick confirmation for existing TOs, where that has happened, becomes irrelevant.
Regards,
Nick
Edited by: Nick Whitehurst on May 21, 2010 3:30 PM

LT45 (Picking Progress) and Two Step Confirmation

Dear all,
I have Two Step confirmation in place for one WM movement type and I am happy with it.
We also use Multiple Processing for Deliveries. As a result, the Groups created by this process are used to monitor the Picking Progress in LT45
In LT22 or LT24 there is clear distinction between Open TO's, Confirmed TO's and half Conirmed TO's (yellow triangle.
Much to my disappointment I cannot see such a distinction in LT45.
Is there a way or another Monitor available that does show me the different statusses? A yellow bar if the group is half confirmed is too much to ask, but an alternative would be nice.
Thanks!
Sandeep

Ananthram,
Thanks for reading my Question.
I am talking about TO's that use Two-step Confirmation. In LT22 / LT24 they show as Yellow Triangle, as you know this means half confirmed.
As you know in LL01 they don't show as yellow but as red, just like in LT45. So this is very misleading.
Can you tell me a place where I can clearly monitor my Picking Progress and see a distinction between Green, Yellow and Red
(Confirmed, Half confirmed, Open)
Thanks again for taking the time.
Sandeep

Two step confirmation

Hi All
Do we have any thing like two step confirmation in Warehouse Management.
Thanking you
With Rgds
Vinod

Yes it's a terminology where the stock removal and putaway requires two separate confirmation. You can have a look in T-code OMLX and click on Mvt Type button for more info.
Amit

Error in confirmation of Transfer orders at Header level (TC LRF2)

Hello All,
A transfer order has single item. It has got confirmed at the item level for the full quantity. The confirmation switchbox at item level is checked in by the system automatically. But in header level the switch box is not checked in.
While trying to confirm the Transfer order at header level, the error message shows that the Transfer order is already confirmed. But the Transfer order still exists in LRF2.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Sasi.

Hi Marcos
Note 566995 is an old correction note, which is probably already implemented on your system but it describes the standard system design regarding confirmations posted in mass processing transactions:
When you enter an operation confirmation via the order info system or the mass processing the system now sets the confirmation type to 'Automatic final confirmation' as well as the indicator 'Post open reservations'. Thus the system automatically generates a final confirmation when you confirm the whole planned quantity and the operation receives status CNF (finally confirmed) instead of PCNF (partially confirmed).
System is designed that way because a mass processing transaction will be generally executed in background mode and a huge number of confirmations can be posted at the same time. Therefore, user will not be able to enter any value to the confirmation.
If you don't want this behaviour you could use the BAPI
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR to develop your own mass processing transaction to post confirmations.
BR
Caetano

Confirming a Transfer Order for RF

I am trying to find a BAPI or function module that will confirm a transfer order for use with a RF device. We have tried using a BDC, but it is too unreliable because of the limit on the number of handling units that it can do at 1 time from the same bin. If you have a way of confirming 30 or more handling units using transaction LT12 in a BDC, I will try that as well.
Thanks.
Edited by: Paul Sullivan on Jun 3, 2008 5:36 PM

Hello ,
you could try with BAPI_SHIPMENT_CHANGE,
but it's released and not documented. So, it's at own risk.
Regards Wolfgang

Two Step Confirmation Transfer Order with Radiofrquency

Friends & Gurus.
Can I use 2 step confirmation with RF? Which transaction should I use? I can do it with regular SAP transactions, but as soon as I do it with RF transactions both Pick and Transfer are confirmed.
Thanks.
Solved, yes you can.
Edited by: albertiosis on Oct 3, 2008 2:48 PM

Hello Abhay Desai,
Please kindly refer to SAP Library which has provided the following documentation on 2-step picking:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
I would suggest you to go through the prerequisites and steps in 2-steps pikcing in the given documentation. You should also be able to access to above with the following path:
http://help.sap.com >> SAP Library
--> SAP ERP Central Component
       --> Logistics
            --> Logistic Execution
                 --> Warehouse Management System
                      --> Goods Issue
                           --> Two Step Picking.
Hope the above helps. If question answered, please close and reward points. Otherwise feel free to get back.

User exits for delivery picking confirmation and transfer order creation

Hi
We have a scenario for which we need help.
This is to do with replenishment from plant to plant.
We have sales sets.
The sales sets needs to be replenished from one plant to another. We want the componenets of the sales sets to picked from the issuing plant. For this we need a transfer order. this needs tobe confirmed and then the goods issue should take place from the issuing plant. Its a two step process.
we are doing Sales sets in STO. The explosion takes place in STO. However when we create deliveries for this. Only the sales set header item without its components are flowing into the delivery.
The Tranfer order does not contain the components either.
However post the goods issue we can create a TO with reference to the TR. This is is not acceptable because we want the picking and confirmation to occur before PGI from the issuing plant.
Could anybody help: We want the TO to be created with the components even though in the delivery only the Sales set header appears. Can u suggest a user exit in which when we create the TR from the delivery the components of the set.
After confirmation of the TO then we want the picking status to be put as C.
Supreeth

Hi,
Check the following users exits.
MWMRFSSG            user exit for sorting TOs in RF system-guided transaction
MWMRFUP             Customer defined general purpose pushbutton called from scr.
MWMRP001            Cust. Exit for Fixed Bin Replenish.: Delivery Item Selection
MWMRP002            Cust. Exit for Fixed Bin Replenishment: TR Quantity Distr.
MWMRP003            Customer Exit for Replenishment using RLLNACH1
MWMRP004            User Exit for Replenishment using RLLNACH4
MWMTO001            Enhancements for end of transfer order generation
MWMTO010            Exit: Calculation of Total Planned TO Processing Time
MWMTO011            Correction of Planned Processing Time for TO Item
MWMTO012            Correction of Sorting and Split Transfer Order
MWMTO013            Stock Removal for Sev. Storage Types as in Stringent FIFO
MWMTOAU3            Separate selection of posting changes for autom.TO creation
MWMTR001            Exits at the end of transfer rqmnt creation (IM,PP interf.)
MWMD0001            Transfer order print via RLVSDR40
MWMD0002            Transfer order print as multiple process with RLKOMM40
MWMIDI07            Enhancement for Output WMPIHU (Create Pick-HU) Inbound
MWMIDO11            Enhancement for message WMTORD: TO with several items
MWMIDO12            Enhancement for Output WMPIHU (Pick-HUs) Outbound
MWMIDO13            Extension for WMMBXY (subsequent tasks after goods movement)
MWMPP001            Enhancement WM/PP Interface (automatic TR generation)
Regards,
Murali

TRM two step confirmation

Hi
I am new to TRM and have run into the following problem.
I have configured the Site and the WH and am performing System guided Putaway (PTWY_SG). As required in WM for the source and destination storage type i have maintained separate confirmation.
After the Transfer order is created, as expected it shows up in the TRM monitor. From the monitor i have created the task for the TO. Once i login via the RF device the task shows up and i execute force confirmation for the same.
Now the situation is that the TO is confirmed partially (the pick step of the 2 step confirmation is processed but the putaway step is not performed). However as i login i cannot see any other task to execute the second step.
If i check the TRM monitor there is only the task which i have forced confirmed. Now how to execute the second step so that the TO is fully confirmed.
Can some one help me with the std process to go ahead with the same.
Sandeepan

Hi Sandeepan,
Can you please check the two settings in tcode OMLX (Path:IMG u2192 Logistics Execution u2192 Warehouse Management u2192 Activities u2192Confirmation) The first of these is the requirement to confirm the pick and placement of a transfer order separately and the second is the requirement to confirm placement and removal of stock into and out of a storage type. For the second setting, by default, the requirement to confirm is switched off in interim storage types.
Other than above setting you need to check which mode is considered to find the rout till destination bin of the TO.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Sudhir

Two-step confirmation of Transfer order in WM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for