Two step Leave Approval Process

Dear All Gurus,
Please help me in this ESS issue. I am facing this issue in ESS Leave Request Application which I will explain with following scenarios.
I have employees Ram and Sham Reporting to Ajay.
1. Line Manager of Ram and sham is Ajay
2. Line Manager of Ajay is Mohan.
Ram has applied leave which came to Ajay inbox for approval. Ajay couldnu2019t able to see it so it went for an escalation to Mohan (who is line manager of Ajay).
Now Ajay donu2019t have Ram request in his UWL and as well as in his SAP Business workplace inbox.
Now Sham has applied leave which again went to Ajay ((who is line manager of Sham).this time Ajay saw the one sham request in his UWL and when he tries to approve it he is getting one more screen in which he is seeing Ram and sham request in the table.
When Ram request already went to mohan why it is coming in the absence table list under the request of sham??
Please help me in solving the same.
Regards
Priya Latha

Hi Priya,
I would suggest you to post your query in the below forum so that HR functional experts can respond to your query...
ERP HCM Employee Self-Service
Thanks,
Jagadish.

Similar Messages

Invoce. N-step dynamic approval process

Hello,
I have a question.
According documentation we have BADI ONLY for SC workflow
and PO workflow.(BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI)
I need N-step dynamic approval process for Invoice.
The question is : do i need to develop my own workflow or is there other functionality or BADI which i can use for INVOICE?
Thank you.
Tania

Hi Hari,
The total value of the shopping cart changes because Manager 1 deletes an item from the shopping cart. So the new value of the shopping cart is 10.000,- euro. In this example all managers must approve up to and including the first one who has an limit higher than the shopping cart value.
Regards,
Martin

Multi-step content approval process

Dear All,
We have a requirement like this:
A content (after it has been authored) has to go through an n-step approval process. In our requirement, suppose if the 3rd approver rejects the content, then it should go back to the 2nd approver. But if we use SAP's built-in approval process, if any approver rejects the content, it goes back to the Content Author.
Any idea to solve this issue?
Please share the code if you have.
Kind regards,
Sreejesh.

Hi Sreejesh,
the requirement in my eyes doesn't give much sense: What should the 2nd approver do with the content rejected by the third approver?! To approve makes no sense, for he knows that the 3rd approver would reject again. And to reject "makes sense" - anyhow, this is already implemented...
So, beneath the question of the usefulness of the requirement, you may implement your own reject command which does exactly what you expect. This probably would mean a modification of the standard behaviour.
Hope it helps
Detlev

Can we disable Archive step in Approval process

Guys,
I wanted to know if I can disable Archive step in the Approval process. Right now the issue is I do not want the people to Archive the document by mistake.
1) Is there a way to disable the Archive step?
2) Or is there atleast a way to restrict it based on roles?
Please help me.
Thanks a lot,
Deepak

Hi,
you cannot configure anything on the Approval process.
If you want to change something you need either modify the standard (if you get the source code) or develop your own process.
The only things you can try, if remove or restrict UI commands.
There are several UI command groups involved.
For example there is the StatemanagementMassGroup with the command statemanagement_archive_mass inside. This you could remove, so that in the layout sets where this group is used, the archive command is gone (e.g. AdminExplorer menu)
But the StatemanagementGroup command group is just a java class and references no commands. So you cannot get rid of the single archive command from the resource context menu. But maybe it is enough for you to remove the whole command group and do approval actions only from a mass menu.
I guess thats the only thing without developing which can be done here.
Regards,
Sascha

Two step stock transfer process

hi All,
i want to transfer material XYZ from plant AA to plant BB in 2 step stock transfer. Qt= 2000
So first i am trying to remove stock from plant AA in 303 movement type.
system throughing error message " Deficit of PL Stock in transfer 48000 PC: XYZ BB
ERROR Message no. M7 021
after analysis i found that in plant BB , in Stck trans.(plnt) , stock is showing ( - 50000)
i wonder how this stock got negative.
please help resolving this issue.
any help will be highly appreciated.
thanks in advance
regards,
Anubhab

hi Pankaj,
in both plant AA & BB , negative stock is allowed.
now i found that if i put the quantity equal to or more than 50000 , then system not giving error.
but if i put a smaller qt , say 1000, then system deducting it from 50000 & showing deficit 49000 at plant BB.
so the question is can't i transfer less than 50000 qt to BB from AA?
Also what is meaning of 50000 qt showing as negative in stock in transfer stock ? does it mean that with out posting 303 at plant AA , customer has posted 305 at plant BB?
Please help me understand. thanks .
regards,
anubhab

Approver skipped during approval process in N-step BADI workflow

Hi,
I am some problem in n-step BADI approval process. For some reasons one of the approvers is skipping during approval. And later in the approval preview it observes that the approver, who is just above the skipped approver, is appeared twice.
I am not able to simulate this issue though this is happening in the system frequesntly though it is not for all.
Can you please let me know what is the problem in the system and how can we rectify this issue?
Thank You.
Regards,
Krish

Hello
sorry search for the n-step WS14500015 is the item based...
Another thing, you can try with testing to restrict the case to special conditions. Are there any added-approver there? Is there any approver who makes some changes to the SC? etc..
Daniel

Sharepoint Designer - Two step List Workflow task item is not changing the status from not started to Complete

Hi
Using SPD i am creating list workflow.
Scenario: Employee submits a request . Task assign to manager. Manager can either approve/ reject. If approve then change the state column to "done". If rejected the state column to "Rejected".
Problem is "Assign a to do item" is assigning the task to manager. But after manager approves the status in the task list not changed to "Completed". Still it is showing "Not started". I dont want to manually complete the task.
Please help me for automatic process.
What i should do to change the status to "Complete" automatically after manager approval
Regards
Jhanani
Janani.R

Hi Janani,
From your description, you would like to create an approval workflow for a list. When an employee submit a request to the list, an approval task should be assigned to manager, then manager could approve or reject the request. From the request list,
we should be able to see the Approval task’s status.
Not understand the reason of designing the workflow to two steps, an approval action should be enough from my understanding. For producing, I create a list named Request list, then customize it in InfoPath form to add a Request field for stating request
content. Then add a workflow to list named Approval task, add the action of Start an approval process with administrator and make the workflow automatically start when item is added.
The image below shows the status of Adding items, Approving and Rejecting. Please check if it could meet your requirement.
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected] .
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Launch Leave Approver Application without using UWL

Hi
Feedback from initial UAT has been that the users find the UWL awkward to use and the leave approval process has too many steps. They would be happier if they could get to their list of leave applications requiring approval directly ie avoiding the UWL.
Is this possible? In portal content it is possible to open the Leave Approver iview directly and previewing the iview appears to be OK. However when I add this link into the Navigation in our custom MSS role and access through MSS the same iview appears to be blank.
Is it possible to access this application directly?
Regards

Just as an update we have managed to do this avoinding the UWL and it appears to work fine. Just created a new page with the leaver request approver iview on it. My initial problems with the link from the portal were down to my home page configuration and nothing to do with the fact that you need to use the UWL.
We do intend to use the UWL in the future when more functionality is incorporated, it just seemed overkill for one wrkflow application.

Can't set up two step verification - no trusted devices

Hi,
I can't seem to set up two step verification on my apple ID.
I can log in to manage my account and start the process, but when I get to what should be the list of trusted devices (step 1), the list is empty and I'm prompted to enter in a number than can receive SMS. I do this using my iphone number, and I recevie a 4 digit verification code via SMS/iMessage, but I can't enter this in to the setup process on the manage my ID site as there is nowhere to enter the code in to in order to have my iphone number tagged as a trusted device. So, I can't get past step 1.
I have been able - in the past - to allow a new device to use icloud keychain using another device to verify it.
All IOS devices are 7.1.1, and the mac is 10.9.3.
For info, I have an iphone, imac, and two ipads all set up using the same apple id, all are signed in to iCloud with the same id for keychain syncing, and all have find my iphone enabled. I can log in to icloud or use the find my phone app and see all my devices in the device list, and locate them. I've tried turning find my iphone off and on - no change, devices still don't appear in the two step verification setup process.
I've rung apple support and no luck - they suggested waiting 24 hours and trying again - but still no worky.
Am I doing something wrong, or is there a problem that someone else has been bale to solve? I'd really like two step verification enabled but am stumped.
Help!
Cheers.
Andrew

I had the same problem.
I don't know whether or not it was a coincidence, but I did the following:
Use a computer to Logon to www.icloud.com.
Go into Account Settings.
Click on Advanced.
Then click on logout of all browsers.
I was then able to log into My AppleID and start the two step authentication setup. When I added a new phone, it sent an SMS and it then prompted me for the 4 digit code.
Again, not sure whether this is a coincidence, but I never received the prompt to enter the 4 digit code until I accessed the iCloud website and followed the above steps.

How to set up approval process for test case in SAP solution manager?

Hi Experts,
We need to setup a 2 level approval process for test case documents in SAP Solution Manager.
e.g. If test case document is uploaded for transaction "MM01" then first it will go to Reviewer1. Once Reviewer1 approves it , should go to Reviewer2.
Adn finally once reviewer2 approves it , it will be complete.
What are the required configurations and steps for approval process setup? It will be helpful if screenshots and detailed steps are provided.
Thanks.
regards,
Sanjana

Hi,
the above requirement we are going develop add on.below code is there. in this code how we can set for line level amount instead of document total amount
Private Function GetCondition(ByVal sCondition As String) As ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum
        Try
            Select Case sCondition
                Case "Deviation from Credit Limit"
                    Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDeviationFromCreditLine)
                Case "Deviation from Commitment"
                    Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDeviationFromObligo)
                Case "Gross Profit %"
                    Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctGrossProfitPercent)
                Case "Discount %"
                    Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDiscountPercent)
                Case "Deviation from Budget"
                    Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctDeviationFromBudget)
                Case "Total Document"
                    Return (ApprovalTemplateConditionTypeEnum.atctTotalDocument)
            End Select
        Catch ex As Exception
            MsgBox(ex.Message())
        End Try
    End Function
Please guide me.
Regds,
Samapth Kumar.

Is N level workflow in SRM suitable for BRF rather than the two step approv

Could anybody give some information about N level workflow in SRM abt whether it is more suitable for BRF (business rule framework) for agent determination rather than the two step approval workflow ?

Hi Rita,
BRF is process level configuration. You will have to define a schema and it will be tied to a Business object (say BUS2121). Schema consists different process steps. Each process step can be tied to a work flow (Task id). So, it doesn't matter whether 2 step or N step WF in BRF for the process step. Agent determination will happen regardless.
Regards,
DV

How to determine N Step Approval process through Process Controlled workflow

HI
For SC approval process after 4th level of approval the workflow keep go N step till the approval determine. If no approval find then go for WF Exceptions.
In PCW we have process level like 100, 200, 300 and so on. What would be the procedure for Nth process level determination in SRM process controlled workflows settings.
Regards
Kharabela

Hi,
From SRM 7.0 PCW, requestor of SC or creator(buyer) of the PO can't be in the approval list.. this is standard...
create two custom events like zev_po_schema_eva and zev_po_sl_approval
create two custom expression.. one with constants as zev_po_schema_def and other one is formula interpreter(0FB001)..
assign zev_po_schema_eva as schema evaluation for PO.. MAKE SURE YOU LINK THE zev_po_sl_approval
with as zev_po_schema_def..
   now create schema definition entry and specify as zev_po_schema_def..
   now create process level
   100 approval / approval with completion ( Your chooice ) .. maintain zev_po_sl_approval as evaluation id in the process level... maintain RR_SPENDING_LIMIT_APPROVER as Resp.Resolver...
maintain formula interperter value as (OV_SC_PREVAPPROVALIMI < 0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE ) AND (OV_SC_SPNDNGLMTFRQST < 0V_PO_POTOTALVALUE).
Saravanan

Upgrade to 7.3 in a two step process

while upgrading from 7.0 to 7.3, we are using a two step approach:
1. Upgrade to EHP1 from BW7.0
2. Upgrade to 7.3 from EHP1
We are doing this as our current SAP BI system is on BI7.0 SP 14. My question is should we do a post check after we move to EHP1 or can i wait to move to 7.3 and then do a complete system scan then?

Hi Vasavi,
Suggestion will be to do basic Post upgrade Checks after EHP1 Upgrade. I am not sure to which SP level you are planning to upgrade (SP06 , 07 or 08). But doing these Post upgrade Checks & correcting issues at that time would ensure you do not end up in big list of issues once u upgrade to BW 7.3.
When we upgraded to EHP1 SP04 initially, we faced certain issues like DSO load getting failed, Process Chain Issue, Broadcasting issues etc. So for better Issue management perspective, my suggestion will be to do Post upgrade checks after EHP1 upgrade as well.
Thanks
Swapnil

Stock Transfer Order two step process

Hi!
we are following stock transfer order in two step process along with WM
we are using movement types 641 & 101.
Now our client rerquiement is : when goods issue is posting in supply plant ( movement type 641), the accounting entry should be Goods in Transit A/C dr TO Stock Account Cr.
when goods receipt is posting in receiving plant the accounting entry should be : Stock Account a/c dr to Goods in Transit A/C, if there are price differences it will be posted to price difference accounts ( both have price control "S").
how can we acheive this.
Now only at the time of 641 or 101 we posting the accounting document as: Stock A/C dr ( receiving plant) to Stock A/C Cr ( issuing plant) and price difference.
regs,
ramesh

we can a report in MB5T, but there you cannot find value of the stock, only quantity of stock, as in STO, there will not be any price, that is the problem.
regs,
ramesh

Processing a Two-Step Group in parts

Dear all,
I am processing my Two step group with LT0e and would like to process it partially.
Is there a way to do that?
Some background: When Picking from one of the Storage Types I want to use a Return Storage Type. Since this applies to one Outbound flow only, I have defined the Return Storage Type in my WM movement, NOT in the Pick Storage Type.
In 2-step customizing, I have omitted the movement type, and am entering the Movement Type myself in LT0e. Only thing, I want to be able to make some kind of selection here so with my Movement Type I process only those items from the One Storage Type I am focussing on.
To much info?
Again, thank you for your time.
Sandeep

In LT0E once you have selected your group and via subsequent function do the picking step(2step picking -> start picking), you should be able to make the lines which you dont require "Inactive". Then you have only those lines for which you want to do the picking with your required movement type.
Sandeepan

Two step Leave Approval Process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for