Two TOs got created for a single Posting Change

Dear All,
A material document with movement type 309 got posted in a plant where WM is active.Here the material is moving from one batch to another batch.
The material document has 100 items.For each item when this movement happens a Posting Change will get created in WM and this will get converted to TO immediately through background job.
For all the materials except one this is happening fine, ie if for example if the quantity in the material doc is say 100 PC,then posting change will get created for 100 PC and this gets converted to single TO with 100 pc
But for one materal , for a Posting change of qty 90, two TOs got created with same qty ie 90 pcs each.
Please let me know your thoughts on this.What may be the reasons for this
Regards
Shyam

Dear RK and Arakish,
Thanks for the replies.
But i think i need to expalin you the issue in detail.
Problem Description:
1) Single Posting change getting converted to two TOs with same quantity each
2) Unable to go into display mode or change mode of Posting Change because of Error message. u201CPosting change quantity less than quantity already postedu201D
Message no. L2145
Sceanrio:
Material Document is posted with 309 movement,for moving a single material from single batch to different batches. The material document consists of 140 line items for the same material, but movement happening to 140 different batches.
For example First line item of the material document corresponds to movement of the material
From batch 1530040 to batch 71656W01 with quantity 105.438 DIE
Second line item
From batch 1530040 to batch 71656W02 with quantity 105.374 DIE
For each line item, once the movement is posted in IM, corresponding Posting Change get posted in WM with the same Quantity. A background job converts Each Posting Change to single TO with same quantity.
For example: For the first line item , Posting change 713513 got created with quantity 105.438 DIE which got converted to TO 1057743 with same quantity ie 105.438 DIE
Issue:
But only for one line item, the Posting Change with Quantity 90.901 DIE got converted to two TO s of quantity 90.901 each. And the posting change status is Partially Processed
Because of this, we are not able to go inside the Posting Change neither in the Display mode or Change mode due to the above mentioned error message.
Please let me know your thoughts on this
Regards
Shyam

Similar Messages

Two different invoices created for one order for two different lines

Hi All,
I have an order with four line items that was shipped on the same day, invoiced on the same day and all lines have the same delivery number yet two inovices were created for this order..one for the first three lines and one for the last line.
Can anyone please explain what can cause this to happen?
Thanks
A/A

Hi Asgar,
If a single order has been split into two invoices, you should check the values of the mandatory columns. During Autoinvoice, the grouping is based on the madatory columns and also your grouping rules. If any of the mandatory column has a different value, it will split into different invoice.
Please refer the following metalink note for further details
Subject: How Autoinvoice Grouping Works
Doc ID: 98772.1
Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Anil

Two idocs are created for one output message type

hi all,
we are communicating our sap idocs to external system using ALE.It is working smoothly.
Our problem raises here,
.idocs are creating at the time of output type attachment for purchase orders.But rarely,two idocs are creating for one message type.It means two idocs are created for same Purchase order.It makes complications for the external system.
anyone can help me pls?
thnks in advance..........

thanks jurgen for ur reply,
jurgen, the second idoc is not an "ORDCHG",It is the replica of first idoc.This one has also "ORDERS" message type.The only difference between these idocs are the time.It means the difference between the time field segments of these idocs have only three(3)seconds difference.We think that its from the system error.If it is not from the system error pls give me the explanation.
thanks in advance.......

Multiple beans getting created for a single jsf page

Hi all,
I am developing UI pages using JSF in 'IBM Websphere studio Application developer.'
Suddenly I have started facing some weired problem.
I have one jsp file 'Schedule_Process.jsp' and
corresponding bean file 'Schedule_Process.java'.
Everytime I run the jsp page a new bean file gets created with suffixes as 1,2,3...
So i have 'Schedule_Process1.java', 'Schedule_Process2.java'.....for a single jsp file.
The jsp file gets mapped to the newly created bean file. The mapping entry automatically comes in faces-config.xml file.
Thus my bean code is divided into multiple beans.
Sometimes this code run but sometimes it doesnot.
To get everthing working i have to remove extra mapping entires from faces-config.xml. Also have to delete all new versions of bean files except the latest one. and then i have to rename the latest file(with number as suffix) to remove the suffix.
This works sometimes but there no guarantee that it will work.
I desparately want to know the reason behind this problem.
Any help on this issue will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks a lot in advance!!!

Make sure in the faces-config.xml file you have
your managed bean set a session.
<managed-bean-scope>session</managed-bean-scope>
and assure that you have the follwoing lines of code in the web.xml file
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD</param-name>
<param-value>client</param-value>
</context-param>
Hope this helps

Are there any workarounds for multiple PDF files created for a single Word 2011 document?

I am running...
Mac OS X Version 10.6.8
Word for Mac 2011
Adobe Acrobat X Version 10.1.0
I am working with 100 plus page Word documents that go back and forth between portrait and landscape layouts. When I attempt to create an Acrobat PDF document (or one using the native Mac PDF function), I end up with 10 to 15 separate PDF documents. One person suggested that I simple stitch them together, which is an inordinate amount of work as compared to how simple it is do on my PC with older versions of Acrobat and Word. However, I have noticed that the margins are way off and the pagination is off sometimes too. So even this workaround is not the answer. I last talked to Microsoft, Apple, and Acrobat tech support about five weeks ago. Each blaming the other two but saying they were working together to solve the problem. My recent searches of forums has not revealed any solutions nor have updates changed anything.
As I am anticipating the day when my old PC stops working, I am searching for a possible workaround or other solution for this problem.

Thanks for your reply.
The tip-off may be this. In Word 2007 on my pc when I print the document to a printer, Word generates 1 print file for the entire document. If I print to PDF, one print file is generated by Word and Acrobat creates a PDF from this file.
What I just discovered by accident was that when Word for Mac 2011 prints the same Word document to a printer it creates about 10 different print files. So instead of a 100 page PDF document I end up with 10 PDF documents of 1 to 30 pages depending where the page orientation shifts in the Word document. If you print to a printer that is not turned on, you can see all of the files stacked up in the printer queue. I suspect that Word for Mac 2011 generates 10 different print files during the PDF creation process and therefore Acrobat logically creates 10 different PDFs. Unfortunately, there are margin errors and other layout errors in these 10 different PDFs so stitching them together is useless.
I am beginning to think that the way Word for Mac 2011 prints documents is simply incompatabile to Acrobat or the PDF creator that is native to the Mac OS.
I just think that this is a problem that Microsoft is going to have to fix.

How to use two different port numbers for a single OC4J container

Hi,
I have a container OC4J_System running in 7998 port, now I want to add one more port for the same container.
Is it feasible?
Kindly help me out.
Regards
Vicky

It's quite complicated, see
Two Page Numbering Schemes in the Same Document.
Regards, Hans Vogelaar (http://www.eileenslounge.com)

Two spool getting generated for a single SAP script

Hi ABAPers,
I have a SAPscript development. This is a PO form for India. When I do a "Trial printout" in ME9K I see that two spools are generated. This is my first problem as till last week only one spool was getting generated. Only spool should be generated.
My second problem is that, the second spool which is generated has texts shown in some different language than English (my form only exists in language EN which is the orginal one too). When I debugged this whole thing, on the second run of the debugger (i.e. when the second spool is generated), when the control goes to a text in one of the windows, that text is shown in some other language (in debug mode also). Please note that the standard text is a Global standard text and it exists in around 6 languages.
I guess if only one spool is generated then my second problem would be solved. But then why are 2 spools generated in the first place?
If anyone has came across similar kind of problem please help. Thanks in advance.
regards,
Prakhar

Hi,
Check this..
1. Go to txn. NACE... select application "EF"... then click on "Condition Records" button
2. Select your Output Types...(ex. NEU)....
3. Go to Change condtion Record Screen. Select ur condtion then click on "communication" button..
4. Under Print Output Check the field "Number of Message" if it is 2 then delete it.
Regards
GK.

Utilizing Two Apple ID's for a single iTunes Match Account

Hi everybody, just signed up here on the apple forums and a brand new mac user! So I subscribed to iTunes Match and it's currently in the process of uploading all of my songs into iCloud. However, I have two apple id's associated with itunes and for some reason, I'm noticing that the songs I purchased from my other id are not eligible for iCloud. Once everything is done uploading in iCloud with my main apple id, can i then utilize that same Match subscription to upload the songs i bought with my other apple id? Thanks!

Hi,
You can only use one Apple ID with iTunes. If you use your other Apple ID you will risk being locked out of your 1st account for 90 days.
However, if you have authorised your other music to play in your iTunes library, you should be able to match or upload those tracks.
Read this thread https://discussions.apple.com/message/23847147#23847147
Jim

Two calculations are required for a single condition type

Hello Experts,
I have a requirement to calculate the VAT conditon type in a pricing procedure...like in one case ( If TAX Indicator set to "0,1,2" at sales order header level) tax should be calculate on PR00 & 3 other condition types....in second case ( If TAX Indicator set to " 3 " at sales order header level) tax should be calculate on 3 other condition types except PR00. But make sure that TAX Indicator "3" always set by user manually during the creation of sales order.
Another hurdle is if user set the indicator as 3 manually during the creation of Sales order then price will not be redetermine automatically, So I need this to be happend automatically.
Let me know how should I proceed further to fix the requirement.
Appriciate quick response.
Regards,
Chandu

Hi Sudir,
Somehow my edit did not get saved:
This is suppoed to read
Set up your pricing as follows:
10 PR00
20 Z001
30 Z002
40 Z003
100 Subtotal #1 = Sum of 10 through 40
110 ZSUB = Discount condition with condition record for 100% for Tax indicator = '3' (otherwise 0) with base = line 10 (PR00)
200 Tax base = 100 through 110
In other words:
For tax indicators = 0,1 or 2
Tax base (Line 200) = PR00 + Z001 + Z002 + Z003
For tax indcator = 3
Tax base = PR00 + Z001 + Z002 + Z003 - (100% x PR00) = Z001 + Z002 + Z003
Yiou will probably aneed to put some code in one of the sales order user exits to trigger repiricing if you change this manually.

Transfer Order auto create for Posting Change not working

Hello Gurus -
When we release an inspection lot from "Q" status, it creates a posting change notice, and we have it configured to create a TO in the background to the same bin, and auto confirm. The desired and intended result is to take something from "Q" status to unrestricted status, while keeping it in the same bin - and avoiding the user having to deal with the transfer orders. Essentially it is seamless and all in the background, the user just sees that he has changed something from quality status to unrestricted.
It works fine when the entire quantity is selected for the usage decision, but when a partial usage decision is made, the transfer order does not create - and requires processing in LU04 for the posting change.
Why would this work for an entire qty, but not work for a partial qty - and simply require someone to go in to LU04 and hit "create transfer order" - with no additional information?
Any help would be most appreciated. Does it have something to do with a setting of quants?

Hi,
In case of a usage decision for a partial quantity, it is not possible to create the Transfer Order for the generated posting change notice automatically. This is only possible when the full quantity is released. The same happens if you release a partial quantity and post the rest to blocked stock or scrap. The reason is, there needs to be a user decision, which part of the quantity has to be posted, this is necessary for example when the quantity is distributed in the warehouse over many storage bins. But even if the full quantity is on one storage bin, there is no automatic TO creation. You can see this also in the online
processing (LT05), in case of partial quantities you have to enter the selected quantity in the quant list, for a full posting this is not necessary.
Hope this helps,
Sinéad Curran

Light Oracle DB version,for single post

Hi.
Is there any version of an Oracle DB, that doesnt require a server running. That can be lightweighted as access or HDBSQL for java?
For a single post, single user working at any time.
Cheers.

Oracle 10g Express Edition I'm not sure I would describe XE as lightweight, certainly not in the way that HDBSQL is. However, it is free.
It really depends what the OP's requirements are. Freeness? Embeddability? Ease of use?
Cheers, APC
Blog : http://radiofreetooting.blogspot.com/

How to place outbound files to multiple channels for a single agreement

Hi All,
We need to send single HIPAA 834 document to two different locations(channels) of the same TP. We have single HIPAA 834 agreement with one TP and one channel. is there a way to add two TP outbound channels for a single TP/agreement?
Thanks,
Kathar

Hi Kathar,
is there a way to add two TP outbound channels for a single TP/agreement?One TP may have multiple channels but one agreement can have only one associated channel. You may consider using the broadcast feature of Oracle B2B here.
You may read about this feature here -
https://blogs.oracle.com/oracleb2bgurus/entry/broadcast_feature_in_oracle_as
Please note that this blog was written for 10g but concept and implementation is same in 11g.
You need to create two TP profiles for same TP (you should use different name/identifiers for both) and then make them part of same group by adding identifier "Grouping" in both the profiles with same value. From middleware pass the header "Grouping:<value>" in action name or event name header. At runtime B2B will send the same message to both TP profiles.
Regards,
Anuj

Two table maintenance generator for one table

Can we created two table maintenance generator for one ztable. if yes then what will be the steps.

Hi Prem,
Why you need two table maintenance generator for a single table?
We can generate only single table maintenance generator for a single table.
you can add modification event in inside table maintenance if you need anything to change or validate in insde your table maintenance generator.
Regards,
Prasenjit

More than one Follow On documents for a single shopping cart

Hi All,
How can we determine if there will be more than one follow on document created for a single shopping cart.
One reason could be if shopping cart items have different source of supply.
What could be the other reasons. Also is there any way by which we can debug and find out the number of follow on documents created for a single shoppining cart.
Thanking you all in advance.
Thanks and Regards
Manoj

Hi Manoj,
"Also is there any way by which we can debug and find out the number of follow on documents created for a single shoppining cart."
There's a FM to get all the follow on documents related to the SC and all the relations per item... use BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL and retrieve the E_HEADER_REL for the SC relations, and the E_ITMLIM_REL for each item relations.. there you will see:
OBJECT_ID_A -> OBJECT_ID_B
what it means is the relation between a SC and the PO, or the SC with a BID... you can identify the object types by taking a look in the 'BUS...'
OBJTYPE_A -> OBJECTTYPE_B
SC -> BUS2121
PO-> BUS2201
BID-> BUS2200
etc...
I hope this can help you to retrieve what you need....
BR,
Gerardo....
PS: reward points please....

Two line items created while doing sales excise invoice

Hi all,
I have created an excise invoice through J1iin. But when I do so, there are two line items created for BED on excise paid. where as ideally there should only be one line item created.
The standard entry should be as follows :
Excise Duty BED Paid     617.00
Excise Duty SEC Pay     6.00-
Basic Excise Duty p     599.00-
Excise Duty ECSPay     12.00-
In my scenario the entry is as follows :
Excise Duty BED Paid     181.00     here there are two line items created.
Excise Duty BED Paid     436.00
Excise Duty SEC Pay     6.00-
Basic Excise Duty p     599.00-
Excise Duty ECSPay     12.00-
can anyone help on this?
Thanks
Priyanka
Edited by: Priyanka Patwardhan on May 19, 2011 12:35 PM

HI,
Check the below settings are exist or not at your order to delivery copy controls.
Order requirements     001    Header
Combination requirmt   051    Combination
Header Data            001    Header
Header Data Ext. Sys   0
Handling Units         000
check and revert
Regards
Ram

Two TOs got created for a single Posting Change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for