Two unresolved issues: Network card and Microsoft MCE Remote in XBMC

Hi everyone,
I have a "fileserver" running Arch, and also a HTPC running Arch and XBMC.  Whilst I am technically not really a newbie, I setup the server and HTPC over two years ago and haven't really touched them all that much since, leading me to lose much of what I learned when I set them up.
I have recently purchased the parts and setup a new HTPC and have setup Arch on it but I have two issues that I cannot resolve without some tips to point me in the right direction.
Problem one:
The onboard network interface on the motherboard doesn't seem to work "out of the box" with Arch.  The motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-A55M-S2H.
lspci -vv shows the following:
Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 06)
Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology GA-EP45-DS5 Motherboard
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 40
Region 0: I/O ports at de00 [size=256]
Region 2: Memory at fddff000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=4K]
Region 4: Memory at fddf8000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=16K]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: r8169
ip addr shows the following:
eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 50:e5:49:57:b8:50 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
I am guessing that there is some sort of issue with the Kernel driver in use being r8169 not r8168?  Any tips?
The second issues that I am having is quite different.  I am using a genuine Microsoft Media Centre remot (version 2 I think).  There are two parts to this issue:
1.  Upon boot, IRW shows perfect input such as:
000000037ff07be0 00 KEY_DOWN mceusb
000000037ff07be0 00 KEY_DOWN mceusb
000000037ff07be0 01 KEY_DOWN mceusb
000000037ff07be1 00 KEY_UP mceusb
000000037ff07be1 01 KEY_UP mceusb
000000037ff07be1 02 KEY_UP mceusb
000000037ff07bde 00 KEY_RIGHT mceusb
000000037ff07bde 01 KEY_RIGHT mceusb
000000037ff07bde 02 KEY_RIGHT mceusb
000000037ff07bdf 00 KEY_LEFT mceusb
000000037ff07bdf 01 KEY_LEFT mceusb
000000037ff07bdf 02 KEY_LEFT mceusb
000000037ff07bdd 00 KEY_OK mceusb
000000037ff07bdd 01 KEY_OK mceusb
000000037ff07bdd 02 KEY_OK mceusb
000000037ff07bd9 00 Guide mceusb
000000037ff07bd9 01 Guide mceusb
000000037ff07bd9 02 Guide mceusb
000000037ff07bd9 03 Guide mceusb
000000037ff07bfe 00 KEY_1 mceusb
000000037ff07bfe 01 KEY_1 mceusb
000000037ff07bfe 02 KEY_1 mceusb
000000037ff07bfd 00 KEY_2 mceusb
000000037ff07bfd 01 KEY_2 mceusb
But the problem is that when I enter XMBC, there is absolutely no response to any buttons on the remote.
2.  Once the HTPC has been put to sleep (suspend / S3), upon resume the remote doesn't function quite properly.  IRW shows:
^[[B^[[B^[[D^[[D^[[C^[[C^[[A^[[A
The arrow buttons only work in XBMC, but nothing else.
I understand that when the lirc module was put into the kernel it changed the way things worked, but I cannot understand what I am doing wrong here.
Could anyone please provide me some direction in solving these two issues?  I am not well versed in Arch, but am willing to try and solve my own problem if someone can point me in the right direction.
Thanks in advance.
Luke

I am having much the same problem with the RRC-126 and xbmc. At one point, X was making the remote a keyboard, which let some basic stuff work. Changing it in the xorg.conf stopped X from loading it as a keyboard and let lirc take over, then even the most basic functions (left, right, play pause) doesn't work. XBMC does seem to be connecting to lircd, but commands from the remote aren't being picked up (even though irw shows output fine)

Similar Messages

  • Thinkpad X130e AMD e300 approved minipci network card and UEFI preventing Fedoraliveusb from booting

    I am just wondering where can I find the list for approved minipci wireless network card or disable the UEFI lock for it
    I am trying to install Killer NIC N1103 on it
    ""ERROR
    1802: Unauthorized network card is plugged in Power off and remove the miniPCI network card.""
    One more thing is there anyway to disable the UEFI lock so I can boot from my Fedora live usb?

    Hello,
    As far as I know, Lenovo offers no way to disable the whitelisting for MiniPCIe cards in the BIOS/UEFI firmware.
    You may be able to find firmware that does this from a third-party, but I would imagine that installing it voids your warranty.  At least until Lenovo-provided firmware is reinstalled.
    Regards,
    Aryeh Goretsky
    I am a volunteer and neither a Lenovo nor a Microsoft employee. • Dexter is a good dog • Dexter je dobrý pes
    S230u (3347-4HU) • X220 (4286-CTO) • W510 (4318-CTO) • W530 (2441-4R3) • X100e (3508-CTO) • X120e (0596-CTO) • T61p (6459-CTO) • T43p (2678-H7U) • T42 (2378-R4U) • T23 (2648-LU7)
      Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • Replacement wired network card and driver for G4/OSX 10.3.9???

    Does anyone know of a wired network card that will work in a Mac (with or without a driver) when the one on the mother board is not longer functioning? It seems that my built-in Ethernet card was fried in a recent electrical storm and I'm looking for a replacement so I can connect to the internet again. My cable internet modem and cables were replaced after the storm and have been determined to be in working order.
    No theories, please -- I'm looking for a proven solution.

    Hi
    I found the Kingston KNE100TX (NB not KNE110TX) to be satisfactory in my B&W G3.
    Drivers required and available from Kingston up to OS9. No drivers required for OSX. See
    http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/OSX/osx_networkcards.html#kingston
    (There are other reports in this linked page but my experience is with the KNE100TX)
    Best wishes
    John
    G4 Quicksilver/733/1GB/80GB(ATA)+18GB(SCSI)   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

  • Configure / Enable network card, and DHCP on VMware Workstation 6

    Hi Everyone,
    I am newbie in Solaris. If you can walk me through steps by steps, I would really appreciate it.
    Problem/Question: One main issue, No network connection.
    Background:
    VM machine 01:
    I installed Solaris 10/06 first, it starts and works ok. However, when I tried to use the Update manager to update, it doesn't allow me to. It said something like "Failed" connection". However, it has normal internet connection, and it is just a litte slow, but internet connection works ok.
    VM machine 02:
    I installed the most recent distro: Solaris 10 8/07. The installation process went fine. I selected "Network" and connect to "DHCP" at the installation process just like "VM Machine 01". And the installation went through fine too.
    The problem comes after the installation and it starts to reboot, and trying to get a IP address.
    The boot screen said something like IP 192.168.XXX.XXX has the same Mac Address XX XX XX XX XX XX on pcn01
    This error message pops up 4x or so, it then took me back to end section of the installation screen where it asked me if the computer is connected to "Network" and "no Network", and installed the new protocol "IPv6"...
    Since I got the error message, I selected "No Network", and it didn't take me to "DHCP" page. Then, the system started fine, but no network connection.
    What interesting and wired is that, "Connect Properites" of the PCN01, it shows that it has an IP address, and try to transfer data. Unfortunately, nothing comes up.
    On a post from VMware, it mentioned that SUSE Linux sometimes has this problem with the network identifier and mac address is being the same. And it suggested to do some manual changes.
    http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=http--pubsvmwarecom-guestnotes-guestossuse10html&sliceId=&docTypeID=DT_PRODUCTDOCUMENTATION_1_1&dialogID=46496526&stateId=0%200%2046494431
    I am not sure if it would be the same for Solaris, and if it may be, would you please tell me where and how to change the mac address in Solaris?
    Thanks in advance,
    Best,
    Xin

    do you have dhcpcd installed? nm 0.7 uses dhcpcd instead of dhclient by default, so it seems there is something wrong with that.
    oh and !dhcp can be removed from INTERFACES aswell, what does that even do?
    as i said above, the things i mentioned before weren't fixes for your problem, so it's no wonder they didn't solve your problem
    they were just cleanups for your networking stuff and to make nm really do the part it is supposed to.

  • Load Balance Network Cards and Fail over services

    Hi,
    Im looking at setting up 2 MAC server each with basic services (ie AFP, Open Driectory, software updates and DHCP)
    Both servers are less then 12 months old and are both attached with GB ports to the RAID where all the user data is stored.
    My questions is how to I setup the 2 network interface cards to act as one and load balance the traffic accross both interfaces?
    also I was wondering if it was possible to fail over AFP services, so if one server went down the other would pickup file services where it left off?
    I know how to fail over OD and the other services dont matter to much.
    Thanks in advance for your assistance

    My questions is how to I setup the 2 network interface cards to act as one and load balance the traffic accross both interfaces?
    This is simple link aggregation in System Preferences -> Network
    Click the + button at the bottom and choose new Link Aggregate. Choose the existing interfaces (presumably en0 and en1) and you're set.
    Note that this requires support in the switch the server is connected to (it needs to support LACP), and that you will bounce your network connection when you set this up (so don't do it when the server is actively servicing clients)
    also I was wondering if it was possible to fail over AFP services, so if one server went down the other would pickup file services where it left off?
    It's possible, but you need to be very careful with regards to data integrity. For example, typically each server is going to have a local directory (or directories) that are shared. If Server A fails and Server B takes over, how do you intend to ensure that Server B's data is up-to-date, especially with regard to files that might have been in use at the time?
    It's a tricky problem to solve without putting the data on a shared storage device using something like XSAN to manage arbitration, and now you could be talking serious $$$s.
    I'd recommend looking closely at your file serving needs and work out if it's necessary, or whether you could get by with dividing the load across servers (e.g. some sharepoints are on one server, other sharepoints on the other) so that only a subset of your users are impacted should one server fail.
    File synchronization/replication is a major issue (read $$$$$) for a lot of companies.

  • Mac OS X Server Network users and Microsoft Office Documents

    Hello. I have a lab with 10.8 clients and 10.7 server. I have problems copying documents to network users' desktops. Here's the scoop:
    I'm on my teacher machine. I want to copy word docs (.docx) to the student desktops while they are logged in with ARD. The copy works fine, but when they try to open the documents it is always Read Only. They have to resave the documents as something else in order to use them. Permissions on the documents are read/write for me/staff/everyone on my machine (also a network user account) before I copy them through ARD.
    Am I missing something? This issue was around last year when the clients were 10.6 as well.
    Thanks for any help.

    Hi,
    I am trying to do the same exact thing and find that it is best to do this locally (for now). Not only is the network way slower, but it seems to make things worse. For example, things backed up via the client machine are routed from the FTP server/volume mount and different permission wise. When you try to restore them locally, it should work, but the folder had different permissions because they were initially created in root (for me). So, I hope they would come out with something better than what is available now. Thanks!

  • Issues with Adobe and Microsoft Surface

    I'm using Adobe CC suite on my new Microsoft Surface.  Things were working beautifully but now none of the Adobe programs will open.  I've tried to update everything and still no go.  Any advice?

    uninstall, clean (Use the CC Cleaner Tool to solve installation problems | CC, CS3-CS6) and reinstall.

  • Issue with KB2830477 and SCCM 2012 Remote Control Viewer

    I've just rolled out Feb '13 updates for Windows 7. The update KB2830477 appears to cause
    an issue when closing a remote control session using SCCM Remote Control Viewer
    (2012).
    The following error appears:
    "ConfigMgr Remote Control Viewer has Stopped Working"
    "A Problem Caused the Program to Stop Workingcorrectly. Please Close the
    Program"
    In the Event log, the following event is triggered in Windows Logs>Application.
    Faulting application name: CmRcViewer.exe, version: 5.0.7711.0, time stamp: 0x4f42f979
    Faulting module name: msxml6.dll, version: 6.30.7601.17988, time stamp: 0x5091ff29
    Exception code: 0xc0000005
    Fault offset: 0x00056368
    Faulting process id: 0x24c0
    Faulting application start time: 0x01cf2d7bf99dc96d
    Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Configuration
    Manager\RemoteControlViewer\CmRcViewer.exe
    Faulting module path: C:\Windows\System32\msxml6.dll
    This is with an EventID: 1000. Removing the update resolves the issue.
    Report Id:
    36c3642d-9970-11e3-89bd-028037ec0200

    Hi,
    I recommend you check the log file CMRcViewer.log:
    It records details about the activity of the remote control viewer.
    Located in the %temp% folder on the computer running the remote control viewer.
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Updated bios via Live Update and now my Network card isn't detected

    I have an msi Z87-GD65 Gaming Motherboard and I updated some drivers and the bios via msi Live Update 6 last night and now my computer refuses to recognize my network adapter. The adapter is a TRENDnet N600, plugs into PCIe if I'm not mistaken. Wifi if my only option with this computer, I can't use ethernet, so it's really important I get the network card working again. I have had zero issues with it until this.
    The reason I was updating was to try to get my third monitor to work when plugged into the mobo, while my other two were plugged into the graphics card (which I also installed yesterday, but it's working fine). Note that it still was not working, but I had enabled the IGD Multi-Monitor from bios.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated. I did try uninstalling the drivers but it still won't detect the network card. I also tried disconnecting and reconnecting the network card (and I cleaned the port for good measure).
    I've only been using Windows computers for a year, so bear with me if there's stuff I don't know. Thanks in advance. I can try to get a full list of what was installed later tonight, but all of it that I can find has been uninstalled at this point.
    Note: I did not flash the bios when I installed, which I have now heard is a bad idea, apparently. l:

    what OS you are running?
    Quote
    Note: I did not flash the bios when I installed, which I have now heard is a bad idea, apparently. l:
    you said you've updated drivers & BIOS:
    Quote
    I updated some drivers and the bios via msi Live Update 6 last night and now my computer refuses to recognize my network adapter.
    can you clarify is you update BIOS too or not?
    and what is your current bios version?
    Quote
    and I updated some drivers
    what kind of drivers?
    Quote
    I did try uninstalling the drivers but it still won't detect the network card. I also tried disconnecting and reconnecting the network card (and I cleaned the port for good measure).
    have you tried to load last good known configuration or the last windows restore point?
    or to reinstall OS?

  • Two network cards configuration

    Hi
    I have problem with my network - I have two network cards and it seems they can't live both but I need them both so:
    1st card (rtl8139) is connected to cable modem and gets ip by DHCP (eth0="dhcp" in rc.conf)
    2nd card (nv forcedeth) is connected to router and gets ip by DHCP too (eth1="dhcp")
    When I start them both -> 1st and 2nd card gets good IP by DHCP but when I want to ping google.com for example packet is lost.
    What I want ? I want to use my eth0 (1st card) for internet and my 2nd card for local network.
    ##EDIT##
    My resolv.conf is 192.168.1.1 but I need DNS from 1st interface -> how to do this?
    Last edited by cpu (2007-02-22 22:46:09)

    Messy setup IMO, but anyway....
    Your faulty resolv.conf is the reason you can't ping google. Edit it manually as required, and then use the -R flag in /etc/conf.d/dhcpcd to prevent it being overwritten. DHCP on both interfaces will probably cause routing issues as well, in which case you will need the -G flag.

  • Controlling Two Network Card by LabVIEW

    Hi,
    I'm using LabVIEW 8.5 and Windows XP.
    I am intending to use LabVIEW to control a PC with 2 network cards in it.
    I want to send TCP/IP packet out from one network card,
    and receive the packet from another network card.
    Do I have to change the confguration of the XP system?
    How can I assign those two different cards to send and receive individually?
    Can anyone tell or suggest what to do for me
    Thank you very much~ ^^

    You will not be able to directly prohibit the network cards from receiving or transmitting. You can define your network routes on the PC to route the traffic in the manner you want. Each network adapter will need to have its own IP address. NI's Internet Tool kit has a few issues, most notably the FTP VIs, when using multiple NICs. In addition, any DNS requests made will be routed to the primary network card. Windows determines which interface it thinks is the primary interface. From a code perspective using the native TCP or UDP VIs you will not have to do anything special.
    Mark Yedinak
    "Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
    Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald - Gordon Lightfoot

  • A question about Routers and network cards

    I have a question, Can Hardware confict with internet speed problems with the routers like one having a gigabit etherenet network card and 1/100 intel etherent card?

    Ethernet components are generally compatible across brand names, and speeds.  So you can connect gigabit cards to 10/100 networks.  You can connect 10/100 cards to gigabit networks.
    When you mix speeds, you will be limited to the fastest speed that all components can do, so if you connect a gigabit card to a 10/100 network, you will be limited to a 100 Mbps connection.

  • Switch to second network card

    Hi
    SBS 2011.
    The dell server has two network cards and one is disabled. Now the active card seems to be causing issues. What are the steps to reliably switch to the second network card?
    Thanks
    Regards

    Hi:
    SBS 2011 will respond normally to a switch in nics.  See this thread from this forum:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/753700f8-3fe0-4b8b-a91e-25860ff13191/best-method-to-replace-network-adapter-in-sbs-2011?forum=smallbusinessserver
    Larry Struckmeyer[MVP] If your question is answered please mark the response as the answer so that others can benefit.

  • RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine

    Sean,
    I mean I am always connecting to the nodemgr of the 2nd environment
    successfully. Only when I run the client part of the application that I know
    is up, I get a response from the Name Server that it is actually the first
    IP address.
    I checked again. I defenitely have FORTE_NS_ADDRESS set to IP:5004, in my
    case, and not the hostname. I don't have FORTE_LOCATIONS set any where. the
    NS_ADDRESS for env2 has only 1 IP address associated with it. My Forte
    Control Panel on the client, and hence the NS address has only one entry.
    I tried going into escript like you said, and the name service still thinks
    it is IP1.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 1:31 PM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi; 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Hmmmm? That is a little odd! Let me rehash what I think you are saying.
    You now have two environments each with their own name service with
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS set to a different IP:Port combination. For example you
    are doing the steps:
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=255.255.255.1:5000
    start the nodemgr for env 1
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=255.255.255.2:5000
    start the nodemgr for env 2
    Now when you start a client you are always getting the address for env 1
    back from the nodemgr. I assume you actually mean the name service? Or, do
    you mean you are always connecting to the nodemgr & name service for env
    1?
    If the first scenario is the case and you are connecting to the nodemgr
    for
    env 2 but getting back IP's for services listening on the card for env 1 I
    would ask you what you are setting the FORTE_LOCATIONS value to before you
    start each service. If you are not setting it or are using the host name
    it
    will register using the IP for the primary network card associated with
    the
    machine name and I am again assuming that this is env 1. You need to set
    the FORTE_LOCATIONS variable to 255.255.255.2:0 (based on the steps above)
    before starting your services.
    If the second scenario is the case I would have you check what the
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS is set to before you start up the client. Once again it
    must be the IP:Port combination not host:port combination if you want to
    get
    anything other than the primary card.
    I would also suggest that you do the following. After everything is up
    and
    running execute the following commands:
    escript -fns "ip for env1":port
    findsub nameservice
    showpart
    What you should see is everything currently registered under the name
    service. It will have the name and any "locations" (IP and port) that it
    is
    registered as listening on. I would look for the nodemgr and see where it
    has advertised itself. I would then look for any services you expect to
    be
    registered there and also verify where the have advertised themselves. If
    there are multiple locations listed for any one service, the client will
    use
    the first one in the list.
    Do the same for env 2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:57 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    I am giving the actual IP address. and not the host name. That is why I
    don't understand what is going on.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 10:53 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi; 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Hello Venkat,
    I probably should have mentioned this before. Your are correct. Forteis
    doing a host lookup if you are providing a name for examplemachine1:5000.
    You can bypass the host lookup by using the actual ip dot addressinstead
    for example 255.255.255.255:5000. This way you are taking the name
    service
    out od the picture and Forte will use the address provided.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:27 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    My requirement is that my second card serves as best case performance
    testing piece. This eliminates the network completely. We went one step
    ahead and created a new enviromnent for the second card. Whatever I do,
    the
    nodemgr is returning back the IP address of the first card, even thoughmy
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS does not have the first card in the picture any where.
    I think Forte is doing a host look up and returning the first IP address
    it
    finds, as opposed to returning the IP address specified in theenvironment
    variable FORTE_NS_ADDRESS. Is there a way to trick it?
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 9:54 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    OK, you ran into one of the issues. That is, if both addresses areknown
    to
    the client that is trying to contact the partition it will always usethe
    first address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. This is because FORTE_LOCATIONS was
    designed more as a failover mechanism. So it will always try the
    first
    address in the list and if it succeeds, there is no reason to move onto
    the
    second.
    Now, the second issue is that there is currently a problem with theclient
    failover to the secondary address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. If the firstentry
    fails it is supposed to retry on the second entry. Instead, it
    retries
    the
    first entry again. I know that Forte knows about this but I do nothave
    a
    bug number on it.
    With that said, lets look at a possible solution for you. If the real
    objective here is to have a back up network card available for fail
    over
    on
    the same machine, or use one card to advertise outside your firewalland
    one
    to use inside, then you will have to contact Forte to determine whenthe
    failover problem will be fixed. But, if the objective is to loadbalance
    across the network cards you could have the environment manager listenon
    both ports and then alternate your server partitions across both
    cards.
    For
    example:
    set FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=card1:5000;card2:5000 and then start up the
    environment
    manager
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card1:0 (the 0 in the port causes the OS to pick a
    port)
    and start partition one
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card2:0 and start partition two
    and so on....
    In this scenario the environment manager will be listening on bothcards
    but
    each server will be listening on only one of the two cards. So if a
    request
    comes in for partition1 it will go through card one and if it is for
    partition two it will go through card two. You could assign your
    partitions
    to cards based on expected load.
    Well, I am done. I hope this helps!
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 8:06 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'; 'John Jamison'
    Cc: [email protected]; Jose Suriol
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine
    Sean,
    Thanks for your reply. I tried the approach. I was not very specificin
    my
    question. I do need the ability for server applications to listen and
    server
    on both the network cards.
    I was succesfully able to make the nodemgr listen on both the cardsand
    actually serve requests coming in from both the cards. But, followingyour
    advise, I took a cautious step with FORTE_LOCATIONS. Here is what I
    noticed.
    I have an application that has 6 partitions in total. I used
    FORTE_LOCATION
    to make it listen on 1. Both the cards. 2. Swapped the IP addresses
    for
    both
    cards for this application. 3. One card that I want it to listen on. I
    tried
    all approaches by exporting the locations variable for just this
    application. The nodemgr recieves a request from this pc connected onthe
    second card to talk to one of the partitions. The node mgr responds
    with
    a
    proxy - with the ip address and socket number of the first card. The
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS variable looks like this:
    IP1:5002;IP2:5002.
    Is it possible atall to resolve my problem, without having a seperate
    environment?
    Thanks
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 1998 10:42 AM
    To: 'John Jamison'; Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the
    same
    machine
    Venkat,
    Actually, it is possible for Forte to listen on more than one IP andport
    combination. The first reply to your message was correct. If you
    set
    the
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS to contain multiple entries before starting the
    name
    service, it will advertise on both. For Forte servers you use the
    FORTE_LOCATIONS env variable to get it to advertise on multipleip:port
    combinations.
    We were doing something very similar with another customer I was at
    to
    get
    around a firewall. I will warn you that there are some issues with
    FORTE_LOCATIONS that may keep that portion from working. However,
    from
    reading your note, it appears that all you need is for the nameservice
    to
    advertise and listen on multiple ports and that works fine. I justtested
    it again for sanity sake and it worked. I ran my test on NT using
    Forte
    3G2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of John Jamison
    Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 4:51 PM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine
    Venkat,
    Technically yes this is possible, though not in Forte. A nameserver
    can
    only listen on one port.
    To implement this scheme you will have to write a proxy service (insome
    language
    including perhaps forte) which listens on the well-known port on the
    second card, reads requests, then forwards them to the realnameservice
    (wkp on the first card), and forwards replies back. This is not
    trivial, but some firewall toolkit vendors supply stub code to write
    application specific proxies.
    -J
    Venkat Kodumudi wrote:
    Folks,
    Here is what we would like to do:
    We want to have 2 network cards on a unix box - which means I have
    2
    ip
    addresses, and the connection between the two is the unix box and
    only
    the
    unix box. I have a pc connected to the 2nd network card and I want
    it
    to
    connect to the nameserver that is listening on a well known port
    on
    the
    first network card. We don't want to turn IP forwarding between
    the
    two
    cards. We want Forte to address both cards to talk to clients, in
    one
    environment.
    Can this be done? If so how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive<URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >>>>
    John Jamison [email protected]
    Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
    Sage IT Partners, Inc.
    Voice: 415 392-7243 x 306
    Fax: 415 391-3899
    Internet Enabled Business Change
    <a href=
    "http://www.sageit.com">http://www.sageit.com</a>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

    Hello Venkat,
    I probably should have mentioned this before. Your are correct. Forte is
    doing a host lookup if you are providing a name for example machine1:5000.
    You can bypass the host lookup by using the actual ip dot address instead
    for example 255.255.255.255:5000. This way you are taking the name service
    out od the picture and Forte will use the address provided.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:27 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    My requirement is that my second card serves as best case performance
    testing piece. This eliminates the network completely. We went one step
    ahead and created a new enviromnent for the second card. Whatever I do, the
    nodemgr is returning back the IP address of the first card, even though my
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS does not have the first card in the picture any where.
    I think Forte is doing a host look up and returning the first IP address it
    finds, as opposed to returning the IP address specified in the environment
    variable FORTE_NS_ADDRESS. Is there a way to trick it?
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 9:54 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    OK, you ran into one of the issues. That is, if both addresses are known
    to
    the client that is trying to contact the partition it will always use the
    first address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. This is because FORTE_LOCATIONS was
    designed more as a failover mechanism. So it will always try the first
    address in the list and if it succeeds, there is no reason to move on to
    the
    second.
    Now, the second issue is that there is currently a problem with the client
    failover to the secondary address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. If the first entry
    fails it is supposed to retry on the second entry. Instead, it retries
    the
    first entry again. I know that Forte knows about this but I do not have a
    bug number on it.
    With that said, lets look at a possible solution for you. If the real
    objective here is to have a back up network card available for fail over
    on
    the same machine, or use one card to advertise outside your firewall and
    one
    to use inside, then you will have to contact Forte to determine when the
    failover problem will be fixed. But, if the objective is to load balance
    across the network cards you could have the environment manager listen on
    both ports and then alternate your server partitions across both cards.
    For
    example:
    set FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=card1:5000;card2:5000 and then start up the
    environment
    manager
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card1:0 (the 0 in the port causes the OS to pick a
    port)
    and start partition one
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card2:0 and start partition two
    and so on....
    In this scenario the environment manager will be listening on both cards
    but
    each server will be listening on only one of the two cards. So if a
    request
    comes in for partition1 it will go through card one and if it is for
    partition two it will go through card two. You could assign your
    partitions
    to cards based on expected load.
    Well, I am done. I hope this helps!
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 8:06 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'; 'John Jamison'
    Cc: [email protected]; Jose Suriol
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    Sean,
    Thanks for your reply. I tried the approach. I was not very specific in
    my
    question. I do need the ability for server applications to listen and
    server
    on both the network cards.
    I was succesfully able to make the nodemgr listen on both the cards and
    actually serve requests coming in from both the cards. But, following your
    advise, I took a cautious step with FORTE_LOCATIONS. Here is what I
    noticed.
    I have an application that has 6 partitions in total. I used
    FORTE_LOCATION
    to make it listen on 1. Both the cards. 2. Swapped the IP addresses for
    both
    cards for this application. 3. One card that I want it to listen on. I
    tried
    all approaches by exporting the locations variable for just this
    application. The nodemgr recieves a request from this pc connected on the
    second card to talk to one of the partitions. The node mgr responds with a
    proxy - with the ip address and socket number of the first card. The
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS variable looks like this:
    IP1:5002;IP2:5002.
    Is it possible atall to resolve my problem, without having a seperate
    environment?
    Thanks
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 1998 10:42 AM
    To: 'John Jamison'; Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Venkat,
    Actually, it is possible for Forte to listen on more than one IP andport
    combination. The first reply to your message was correct. If you setthe
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS to contain multiple entries before starting the name
    service, it will advertise on both. For Forte servers you use the
    FORTE_LOCATIONS env variable to get it to advertise on multiple ip:port
    combinations.
    We were doing something very similar with another customer I was at toget
    around a firewall. I will warn you that there are some issues with
    FORTE_LOCATIONS that may keep that portion from working. However, from
    reading your note, it appears that all you need is for the name serviceto
    advertise and listen on multiple ports and that works fine. I justtested
    it again for sanity sake and it worked. I ran my test on NT using Forte
    3G2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of John Jamison
    Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 4:51 PM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    Venkat,
    Technically yes this is possible, though not in Forte. A name server
    can
    only listen on one port.
    To implement this scheme you will have to write a proxy service (in some
    language
    including perhaps forte) which listens on the well-known port on the
    second card, reads requests, then forwards them to the real nameservice
    (wkp on the first card), and forwards replies back. This is not
    trivial, but some firewall toolkit vendors supply stub code to write
    application specific proxies.
    -J
    Venkat Kodumudi wrote:
    Folks,
    Here is what we would like to do:
    We want to have 2 network cards on a unix box - which means I have 2ip
    addresses, and the connection between the two is the unix box and onlythe
    unix box. I have a pc connected to the 2nd network card and I want it
    to
    connect to the nameserver that is listening on a well known port onthe
    first network card. We don't want to turn IP forwarding between thetwo
    cards. We want Forte to address both cards to talk to clients, in one
    environment.
    Can this be done? If so how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive<URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >>
    John Jamison [email protected]
    Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
    Sage IT Partners, Inc.
    Voice: 415 392-7243 x 306
    Fax: 415 391-3899
    Internet Enabled Business Change
    <a href="http://www.sageit.com">http://www.sageit.com</a>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

  • Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine

    Folks,
    Here is what we would like to do:
    We want to have 2 network cards on a unix box - which means I have 2 ip
    addresses, and the connection between the two is the unix box and only the
    unix box. I have a pc connected to the 2nd network card and I want it to
    connect to the nameserver that is listening on a well known port on the
    first network card. We don't want to turn IP forwarding between the two
    cards. We want Forte to address both cards to talk to clients, in one
    environment.
    Can this be done? If so how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Hmmmm? That is a little odd! Let me rehash what I think you are saying.
    You now have two environments each with their own name service with
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS set to a different IP:Port combination. For example you
    are doing the steps:
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=255.255.255.1:5000
    start the nodemgr for env 1
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=255.255.255.2:5000
    start the nodemgr for env 2
    Now when you start a client you are always getting the address for env 1
    back from the nodemgr. I assume you actually mean the name service? Or, do
    you mean you are always connecting to the nodemgr & name service for env 1?
    If the first scenario is the case and you are connecting to the nodemgr for
    env 2 but getting back IP's for services listening on the card for env 1 I
    would ask you what you are setting the FORTE_LOCATIONS value to before you
    start each service. If you are not setting it or are using the host name it
    will register using the IP for the primary network card associated with the
    machine name and I am again assuming that this is env 1. You need to set
    the FORTE_LOCATIONS variable to 255.255.255.2:0 (based on the steps above)
    before starting your services.
    If the second scenario is the case I would have you check what the
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS is set to before you start up the client. Once again it
    must be the IP:Port combination not host:port combination if you want to get
    anything other than the primary card.
    I would also suggest that you do the following. After everything is up and
    running execute the following commands:
    escript -fns "ip for env1":port
    findsub nameservice
    showpart
    What you should see is everything currently registered under the name
    service. It will have the name and any "locations" (IP and port) that it is
    registered as listening on. I would look for the nodemgr and see where it
    has advertised itself. I would then look for any services you expect to be
    registered there and also verify where the have advertised themselves. If
    there are multiple locations listed for any one service, the client will use
    the first one in the list.
    Do the same for env 2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:57 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    I am giving the actual IP address. and not the host name. That is why I
    don't understand what is going on.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 10:53 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi; 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Hello Venkat,
    I probably should have mentioned this before. Your are correct. Forte is
    doing a host lookup if you are providing a name for example machine1:5000.
    You can bypass the host lookup by using the actual ip dot address instead
    for example 255.255.255.255:5000. This way you are taking the name
    service
    out od the picture and Forte will use the address provided.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 9:27 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    My requirement is that my second card serves as best case performance
    testing piece. This eliminates the network completely. We went one step
    ahead and created a new enviromnent for the second card. Whatever I do,
    the
    nodemgr is returning back the IP address of the first card, even though my
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS does not have the first card in the picture any where.
    I think Forte is doing a host look up and returning the first IP address
    it
    finds, as opposed to returning the IP address specified in the environment
    variable FORTE_NS_ADDRESS. Is there a way to trick it?
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 9:54 AM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    OK, you ran into one of the issues. That is, if both addresses areknown
    to
    the client that is trying to contact the partition it will always usethe
    first address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. This is because FORTE_LOCATIONS was
    designed more as a failover mechanism. So it will always try the first
    address in the list and if it succeeds, there is no reason to move on to
    the
    second.
    Now, the second issue is that there is currently a problem with theclient
    failover to the secondary address in FORTE_LOCATIONS. If the firstentry
    fails it is supposed to retry on the second entry. Instead, it retries
    the
    first entry again. I know that Forte knows about this but I do not havea
    bug number on it.
    With that said, lets look at a possible solution for you. If the real
    objective here is to have a back up network card available for fail over
    on
    the same machine, or use one card to advertise outside your firewall and
    one
    to use inside, then you will have to contact Forte to determine when the
    failover problem will be fixed. But, if the objective is to loadbalance
    across the network cards you could have the environment manager listenon
    both ports and then alternate your server partitions across both cards.
    For
    example:
    set FORTE_NS_ADDRESS=card1:5000;card2:5000 and then start up the
    environment
    manager
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card1:0 (the 0 in the port causes the OS to pick a
    port)
    and start partition one
    set FORTE_LOCATIONS=card2:0 and start partition two
    and so on....
    In this scenario the environment manager will be listening on both cards
    but
    each server will be listening on only one of the two cards. So if a
    request
    comes in for partition1 it will go through card one and if it is for
    partition two it will go through card two. You could assign your
    partitions
    to cards based on expected load.
    Well, I am done. I hope this helps!
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkat Kodumudi [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 8:06 AM
    To: 'Sean Brown'; 'John Jamison'
    Cc: [email protected]; Jose Suriol
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same machine
    Sean,
    Thanks for your reply. I tried the approach. I was not very specific in
    my
    question. I do need the ability for server applications to listen and
    server
    on both the network cards.
    I was succesfully able to make the nodemgr listen on both the cards and
    actually serve requests coming in from both the cards. But, followingyour
    advise, I took a cautious step with FORTE_LOCATIONS. Here is what I
    noticed.
    I have an application that has 6 partitions in total. I used
    FORTE_LOCATION
    to make it listen on 1. Both the cards. 2. Swapped the IP addresses for
    both
    cards for this application. 3. One card that I want it to listen on. I
    tried
    all approaches by exporting the locations variable for just this
    application. The nodemgr recieves a request from this pc connected onthe
    second card to talk to one of the partitions. The node mgr responds witha
    proxy - with the ip address and socket number of the first card. The
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS variable looks like this:
    IP1:5002;IP2:5002.
    Is it possible atall to resolve my problem, without having a seperate
    environment?
    Thanks
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sean Brown [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 1998 10:42 AM
    To: 'John Jamison'; Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the same
    machine
    Venkat,
    Actually, it is possible for Forte to listen on more than one IP andport
    combination. The first reply to your message was correct. If you setthe
    FORTE_NS_ADDRESS to contain multiple entries before starting the name
    service, it will advertise on both. For Forte servers you use the
    FORTE_LOCATIONS env variable to get it to advertise on multiple
    ip:port
    combinations.
    We were doing something very similar with another customer I was at toget
    around a firewall. I will warn you that there are some issues with
    FORTE_LOCATIONS that may keep that portion from working. However,
    from
    reading your note, it appears that all you need is for the nameservice
    to
    advertise and listen on multiple ports and that works fine. I justtested
    it again for sanity sake and it worked. I ran my test on NT using
    Forte
    3G2.
    Sean
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of John Jamison
    Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 4:51 PM
    To: Venkat Kodumudi
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Is there a way to have 2 network cards on the samemachine
    Venkat,
    Technically yes this is possible, though not in Forte. A nameserver
    can
    only listen on one port.
    To implement this scheme you will have to write a proxy service (insome
    language
    including perhaps forte) which listens on the well-known port on the
    second card, reads requests, then forwards them to the realnameservice
    (wkp on the first card), and forwards replies back. This is not
    trivial, but some firewall toolkit vendors supply stub code to write
    application specific proxies.
    -J
    Venkat Kodumudi wrote:
    Folks,
    Here is what we would like to do:
    We want to have 2 network cards on a unix box - which means I have 2
    ip
    addresses, and the connection between the two is the unix box and
    only
    the
    unix box. I have a pc connected to the 2nd network card and I want
    it
    to
    connect to the nameserver that is listening on a well known port onthe
    first network card. We don't want to turn IP forwarding between thetwo
    cards. We want Forte to address both cards to talk to clients, in
    one
    environment.
    Can this be done? If so how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Venkat Kodumudi
    Price Waterhouse LLP
    Internet: [email protected]
    Internet2: [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive<URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >>>
    John Jamison [email protected]
    Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
    Sage IT Partners, Inc.
    Voice: 415 392-7243 x 306
    Fax: 415 391-3899
    Internet Enabled Business Change
    <a href=
    "http://www.sageit.com">http://www.sageit.com</a>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

Maybe you are looking for