UArch - arch linux for embeded and old machines

Hello all,
just wanted to post the new web site for uArch it can be found at
http://code.google.com/p/uarch/
check it out and let me know what you think..
zio
Last edited by zio (2008-03-31 06:21:21)

zio wrote:There back in place, if your doing an install can you use the pacman.static instructions. Just to verify the instructions are still working, should work. But I haven't tested yet
Thx for the prompt response , I've tried both methods with the static pacman and the one of my system. But unfortunately both attempts failed because of bad md5sums .
error: failed to commit transaction (corrupted package)
file gcc-4.2.1-1-i386-uclibc.pkg.tar.gz was corrupted (bad MD5 checksum)
file klibc-1.5-1-i386-uclibc.pkg.tar.gz was corrupted (bad MD5 checksum)
file klibc-udev-116-1-i386-uclibc.pkg.tar.gz was corrupted (bad MD5 checksum)
file openssl-0.9.8g-1-i386-uclibc.pkg.tar.gz was corrupted (bad MD5 checksum)
file pciutils-2.2.8-1-i386-uclibc.pkg.tar.gz was corrupted (bad MD5 checksum)
file sysfsutils-2.1.0-1-i386-uclibc.pkg.tar.gz was corrupted (bad MD5 checksum)
file vi-7.1.293-1-i386-uclibc.pkg.tar.gz was corrupted (bad MD5 checksum)

Similar Messages

UArch - arch linux for for old and tiny machines

Hello everyone,
I just want to post my the new location for uArch over at google code.
http://code.google.com/p/uarch/
check it out and let me know what you think.
zio

Don't cross-post.
Closed.

Archmobile: Arch Linux for ARM Devices

Hello,
I want to introduce our Operating System for ARM Devices, that's running on the OpenMoko NeoFreerunner, but we want to support more Devices.
We from http://archmobile.org port Arch Linux on ARM, and we want to give you the simple Freedom which has Arch Linux x86 for ARM.
We can already SSH on our Freerunners, and we nearly have X working. One of the Devs already uses our OS as Daily-Phone with QT Extended.
If you want to know more about us, or you want to try out our System visit us at http://archmobile.org !
The first Snapshot is already at http://naeg.archmobile.org/snapshots/ available. This Snapshot works on the Freerunner and you can SSH into your phone and play a lil bit with our OS Also you can install the System with our Installation Script we provide, to get a really up-to-date System and not configured.
It would be great if other people with other ARM Devices would contact us on IRC(on freenode #arch-arm) and we will try to support your ARM Device too. New Developer are always welcome
I think it would be awesome if we get some support from the official Arch Linux. An Entry in the list of Arch Related Projects would be great.
Feel free to talk about that.
Greetings, naeg - alias rott_at

Thanks for your tips to make the wiki better. I will edit the pages to avoid any confusion you've had. Although I won't do all the changes (e.g. remove $ and #). But I will then make a note which should clarify it.
markc wrote:
Some errors I encountered...
# touch /_Archlinux_ARM
/bin/touch: setting times of `_Archlinux_ARM': Invalid argument
This issue is known with a x86_64 host. I don't know where it originates from as i686 host is fine. Use this binary instead: http://stanny.homelinux.org/touch [1]. This is my home FTP. Thus it might not be available 24/7.
markc wrote:checking dependency style of gcc... /bin/touch: setting times of `sub/conftst1.h': Invalid argument
Should be fixed using the touch binary I provided.
markc wrote:bsdtar: Failed to set default locale
Unsupported ioctl: cmd=0xffffffff80046601
bsdtar: Couldn't list extended attributes: Function not implemented
The error in the first line might be solved by configuring your locales correctly. The error below is issued by qemu.
While this is annoying it doesn't appear to cause any harm. Just ignore it. You'll find other ioctls not being supported by qemu and we expect them to be fixed along with qemu's development.
edit:
[1] I moved it to a permanent location: http://archmobile.org/~harlekin/touch
Last edited by harlekin (2009-07-30 22:16:59)

I bought my wife an ipad for xmas and the machine is faulty the apple authorised dealer admitted it was faulty and wants to replace my new machine with a factory refurbished unit. I told them that i will only accept a new one? am i right?

i bought my wife an ipad retina for xmas and the machine is faulty, it keeps on switching off. the apple authorised dealer admitted it was faulty and wants to replace my new machine with a factory refurbished unit. I told them that i will only accept a new one as it is only a few weeks old and had the problem from the begining? is it correct that apple replaces new defective products with factory refurbished one? I have used apple products most of my life from mac 2 to G5. I had over a dozen apple machines and never had a problem so far? I do not believe this is right..

architectmartin wrote:
In the EU there is also a mandatory two year warranty by european union law. I am not a lawyer but i never signed or agreed to any apple policy at the time of purchase, i was told you have a two year guarantee bring it back if anything goes wrong which i did and now i am being quoted all sorts of policies. my own policy is that if you buy new you get new, with no excuses. I feel a bit cheated by apple if i have to compromise with a second hand unit. the unit is not even a month old and we took it to the original store a couple of weeks after it was bought and they sent us to take it to a servicing dept in another town. I am an apple fan and expect excellent service like the products themselves.
No one ever does sign anything - the purchase itself, where you exchange money for the product, is your de facto agreement to all warranties and policies set forth by both the seller and the OEM supplier. That's a pretty firmly established principle of consumer law (image the nightmare if you had to read and sign to such things every time you purchased anything or everything?).
You can complain to the store or to Apple about it if you wish.

I have a new Mac Pro. I want to use my old Mac Pro as a storage drive for photos and old documents, linked to my new Mac Pro. How do I set up the old computer?

I have a new Mac Pro. I want to use my old Mac Pro as a storage drive for photos and old documents, linked to my new Mac Pro. How do I set up the old computer? Both computers have OS X10.9.3. Currently they are connected by a Firewire 800 cable.

You certainly could keep the old Mac Pro in Firewire mode (hold down the T key on its keyboard as you boot) to show its drives on the new MP. This is basically as fast as putting the drives into a Firewire enclosure.
Or you could boot it normally and share its files over the network using the Sharing panel of System Preferences. If you turn on both File and Screen Sharing, you don't even need to have a monitor attached - you can do all administration using screen sharing. However, this method requires that you open all files over the network, which will be slower than the direct-connect method above, and may also not work with all applications.
Matt

After install of Lion, secondary internal hard drive used for backup and time machine is not showing on the desktop.

After an install of Lion, my secondary internal hard drive used for backup and time machine is not showing on the desktop. Cannot be located with Disk Utility either. Contains vital files! please help...

I have a TB internal drive, but this is what it shows for memory slots:
Memory Slots:
ECC:    Enabled
DIMM Riser B/DIMM 1:
Size:    2 GB
Type:    DDR2 FB-DIMM
Speed:    800 MHz
Status:    OK
Manufacturer:    0x0000
Part Number:    0x000000463732353642363145353830304600
Serial Number:    0x00000000
DIMM Riser B/DIMM 2:
Size:    2 GB
Type:    DDR2 FB-DIMM
Speed:    800 MHz
Status:    OK
Manufacturer:    0x0000
Part Number:    0x000000463732353642363145353830304600
Serial Number:    0x00000000
DIMM Riser A/DIMM 1:
Size:    1 GB
Type:    DDR2 FB-DIMM
Speed:    800 MHz
Status:    OK
Manufacturer:    0x80AD
Part Number:    0x48594D5035313241373243503844332D5335
Serial Number:    0x42076007
DIMM Riser A/DIMM 2:
Size:    1 GB
Type:    DDR2 FB-DIMM
Speed:    800 MHz
Status:    OK
Manufacturer:    0x80AD
Part Number:    0x48594D5035313241373243503844332D5335
Serial Number:    0x4207631E
DIMM Riser B/DIMM 3:
Size:    Empty
Type:    Empty
Speed:    Empty
Status:    Empty
Manufacturer:    Empty
Part Number:    Empty
Serial Number:    Empty
DIMM Riser B/DIMM 4:
Size:    Empty
Type:    Empty
Speed:    Empty
Status:    Empty
Manufacturer:    Empty
Part Number:    Empty
Serial Number:    Empty
DIMM Riser A/DIMM 3:
Size:    Empty
Type:    Empty
Speed:    Empty
Status:    Empty
Manufacturer:    Empty
Part Number:    Empty
Serial Number:    Empty
DIMM Riser A/DIMM 4:
Size:    Empty
Type:    Empty
Speed:    Empty
Status:    Empty
Manufacturer:    Empty
Part Number:    Empty
Serial Number:    Empty

Install Arch Linux with UEFI and GPT

Hi, I purchased a new laptop and I created a partition with Windows 8 (default OS on laptop) and another partition where I want to install Arch Linux.
When I tried to install Arch Linux not boot from CD. After searching in Google I downloaded the latest Arch Linux ISO (2012-12-01) and tried again.
This time CD started without problems but when I used cfdisk showed an error with GPT partition. I went back to search in Google and I read about gdisk and gfdisk and I try it but when I partitioning to install Arch Linux partition show that may cause damage. I searched and searched without success and I wonder if there is a Arch Linux GPT install guide or if someone knows how to install Arch Linux with GPT and a Windows 8 partition in UEFI.
Thanks and regards.

Hi again, finally I got "install" Arch Linux but when I reboot the follow message appears:
"No Booteable Device, Hit any key."
I don't know if I broke Windows Boot Manager, UEFI or both...
I tried to reinstall GRUB but was unsuccessful.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks and regards.

My external hard drive for backup and Time Machine is full. I bought a new HD. Can I just begin using it, or must I transfer old BkUp and TM to the new HD?

My external hard drive for Back Up and Time Machine is full. I bought a new HD. Can I just begin using it and rely on the old HD for past Time Machine versions, or must I transfer the old Back Up and Time Machine files to the new HD?

It is your choice.
If you don't want to be able to far back into the time slots covered by the old disk then just start using the new disk.
If you want to retain the ability to go back into those time slots then copy it.
Allan

Arch Linux for Google Compute Engine

Hi Arch users,
I’ve created a tool that can create an Arch Linux image for Google Compute Engine. It has the compute-image-packages software preinstalled so basic GCE integration works.
I’m working to improve the boot times and shrink the image since it’s a bit larger than I’d like it to be. You can follow the instructions below to boot a virtual machine running Arch.
The source code is hosted on Github: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/ … ge-builder, pull requests welcome!
I've already built one today and has been made public on Cloud Storage at gs://jeremyje/arch-stable/arch-v20140906.tar.gz
Instructions to boot a VM with the image:
1. Create a project or pick an existing one. Turn on Compute Engine.
https://console.developers.google.com/
Click "Create project"
Enter a project name and project id.
Go to Compute > Compute Engine
If necessary, enable billing.
2. Add the Arch Image to your Project
Go to Compute > Compute Engine > Images
Click "New image"
Name: arch-v20140906
Description: Arch Linux built on 2014-09-06
Source Type: Cloud Storage object
Cloud Storage Object Path: gs://jeremyje/arch-stable/arch-v20140906.tar.gz
3. Create an Arch Linux instance.
Go to https://console.developers.google.com/
Select your project.
Compute > Compute Engine > VM instances > Add Instance
Select a zone, machine type, and select the “arch-v20140906” image.
You can SSH into the VM by clicking on the SSH button after you create it.
If you like command line here's the equivalent.
Google Cloud SDK: https://developers.google.com/cloud/sdk/
# Install Python2
pacman -S python2
# Install Cloud SDK
export CLOUDSDK_PYTHON=/usr/bin/python2
curl https://sdk.cloud.google.com | bash
echo “export CLOUDSDK_PYTHON=/usr/bin/python2” >> ~/.bashrc
source ~/.bashrc
# Login, create a project
gcloud auth login
# Add the image to your project.
gcloud compute images create archlinux gs://jeremyje/arch-stable/arch-v20140906.tar.gz --description “Arch Linux built on 2014-09-06”
# Create the instance booting Arch
gcloud compute instances create archvm --zone us-central1-a --machine-type f1-micro --image arch-v20140906
Lastly, there’s no official support for these images but if you find a problem please file a bug or submit a fix on Github.

Hi! Do you have any update of your Arch image?
Thank you

Arch linux for SPARC, is there still any activity?

Hello all,
I just got my hands on some sparc servers and I'd love to put arch linux on there.
I found a wiki-page about SPARCH, but the last real edit is over 2 years ago, and the repository is down.
Is anyone still interested in this / working on this?
Ward

Ok, so Dave replied.
It's been a while since he worked with the SPARC version, and can't find the files anymore.
However, he does have some very useful basic information regarding what the basic problems with the porting process were, the framework he used (Cross-LFS; http://trac.cross-lfs.org/) and so on. Dave also mentioned, it was far faster to do the compiling on his x86 desktop than the actual SPARC box.
I'm highly motivated in getting something done about porting Arch to SPARC. Haven't done anything quite like this before, but that's not a problem. Lack of time might be though, which is why I'm hereby announcing I'm looking for volunteers to participate in a group effort to get the porting moving along and fully available to the public as soon as possible.
What I can offer is this:
- Server space from a fast x86_64 Sun Blade (running Arch) to host repositories and possibly do some compiling as well; 1 gbit uplink
- A Sun Fire V240 with 2 CPUs (1.5 GHz if I remember right) and 4 GB RAM for compiling / testing
- A plan, lots of ideas, an open mind and skills in areas such as design & co-operation
I would love to get involved in the actual porting myself as well, but as things look at the moment, I will only have the chance to do so occasionally and for short periods of time.
I can and very much wish to participate in designing the whole process though, and the first couple of people I feel the project needs would be designers / project leaders as well. Someone(s) with previous experience in porting any OS to any new architecture would be useful to say the least.
I'm also seriously thinking about kind of combining OpenBSD and / or DragonFly BSD with some parts of Arch. Can't really say which would be the dominating "gene" but Pacman and the rolling release approach are one of the key points of the whole thing. I used OpenBSD for years and loved it for its security and stability, but keeping it up to date and clean (no old libraries around etc.) means you will have to re-install it once a year. I got so tired of that I could simply not go on, and after lots of research ended up with Arch - which I love, apart from the fact that some things keep changing so radically that it's easy to drop out of the smooth upgrade track and get your otherwise super-stable server messed up.
So, this secondary plan of mine has to do with taking the best parts of OpenBSD, DragonFly and Arch, and putting it all together in a way that provides a super-stable, secure and KISS distribution heavily targeted at the server scene, possibly being available as 64-bit only. If it's based on Linux kernel then it will have things such as GRSecurity installed and on by default. Server software packages designed to be chrooted (or at least providing a chrooted version) whenever possible, and so on. Clear, unified way of how the system is configured and how the init works - this is where I'm thinking about the Arch way again. I am leaning towards using the OpenBSD kernel but importing lots of stuff from Arch / Linux.
If anyone's interested in either of these little projects, please pm or e-mail me at jyri (ät) archlinux (punkt) fi

I have a 500 gb hard drive partitioned for files and time machine but when i connect it to my mac only the time machine one shows up

well as the title says i have a 500gb hard drive with 2 partitions one with time machine and one for files it worked perefectly until yesterday only the time machine partition appeared in finder, i checked disk utility and both partitions appeared but the one for files appeared in grey and when i press mount an error comes up.

The repair shop likely replaced a major circuit board on your MacBook Pro, so Time Machine thinks that you have a "new" computer and it wants to make a new complete backup of your Mac.
You are going to have to make a decision to either add another new Time Capsule....or USB drive to your existing Time Capsule....and in effect start over with a new backup of your Mac and then move forward again.
For "most" users, I think this is probably the best plan because you preserve all your old backups in case you need them at some point, and you start over again with a new Time Capsule so you have plenty of room for years of new backups.
Or, as you have mentioned, you have the option of erasing the Time Capsule drive and starting all over again. The upside is that you start over and have plenty of room for new backups. The downside is that you lose years of backups.
Another option....trying to manually delete old backups individually....is tricky business....and very time consuming. To get an idea of what is involved here, study this FAQ by Pondini, our resident Time Capsule and Time Machine expert on the Community Support area. In particular, study the pink box.
http://web.me.com/pondini/Time_Machine/12.html
Once you look through this, I think you may agree that this type of surgery is not for the faint of heart. I would suggest that you consider this only if one of the other options just cannot work for you.

Arch linux for Ubuntu users

Hello everyone,
When using Synaptic on Ubuntu it usually sets everything up for you so all the installed software tends to work out of the box without any need to change around configuration. Is the package manager in Arch Linux as integrated as the one from Ubuntu?
Thanks
Frank

I'm new to the linux scene (about 1 month now). My most used distro (and my fallback if I mess up another distro on a seperate partition) was Ubuntu, until I figured out the basics of Arch. After this enlightenment, I find Arch to be much easier to work with in terms of customizing apps, having the right libraries I want, and to just do daily functions. I love to always check for updates to the system. Ever notice in ubuntu there are about 30 repositories you have to sync with? In Arch there are the 3 basic repositories (extra, core, community) and multilib if you are on 64bit. Working with pacman is much more efficient and controlled than apt-get imho.
One thing I hated with apt-get is that you add in 3rd party PPAs that are slow. With Arch and its pacman + yaourt(aur) there is really no need for these 3rd party repositories as everything you can imagine is probably available in official repositories or built by the community. Go check out https://aur.archlinux.org/ this is one of the coolest community made pool of apps around.
As mentioned before, the pacman doesn't hold your hands so be prepared to google and learn what some packages do. For example, I am running gnome and install a KDE app called amarok. Pacman will install everything (including KDE and qt libs) to get amarok started. However, the only things it doesn't install (but it does tell you what) is extra depencies.
Optional dependencies for amarok
libgpod: support for Apple iPod audio devices
libmtp: support for portable media devices
loudmouth: backend needed by mp3tunes for syncing
ifuse: support for Apple iPod Touch and iPhone
So, basically I just read through pacman's output, and either google or make a decision on what is needed. This way my system is controlled tightly and I know more about the system. In the future if I buy an ipod and want to sync, I'll remember there are some optional depencies available for this. I can type "pacman -Qi amarok" and it will show me what it depends on as well as optional depencies.
Sorry for going on for so long but you get the point.

One question about arch linux 2009.02 and ext4

hi,
i want to download newest arch linux version. i heard i can select file system type as ext4, that sounds cool, because i really want ext4. anyway i heard that you need grub2 to properly boot ext4 arch system. so is grub2 will be included in arch linux 09.02? because my root partition is going to be in ext4 file system. thanks for help

syms wrote:
skottish wrote:
syms wrote:Thanks for help. i have one more question - how much ext4 seems faster than ext3? i mean do you feel that ext4 is faster than ext3 in most cases? thanks.
I've never done any benchmarks, but I can tell you that file system checks are many, many times faster.
I do have a warning though, and it can be confirmed by others in this forum: ext4 does not crash gracefully right now. If you're on an unstable system, crashing can cause the loss of at least configuration files. My workstation is rock solid, so I've never seen any issues. Another computer that I was working on was having crashes due to an older Intel card with the newer xorg, and configuration files were being killed all over the place.
Thanks. another thing is that about application start up. for example for me firefox starts in 4 seconds, when i close ff and try to run it again, it opens in about 1 second. what it would with ext4 system? maybe it would launch in 2 seconds at first start?
It's hard to guess like that, but it's bound to be the same or faster. You're not losing anything going ext4 and it is a faster filesystem in general.

Arch Linux for Netbook ?

Hello guys,
im new user with Linux
is arch Linux compatible with Netbooks ?
because im using crunchbang Linux . i faced many incompatibility issues like Display/backlight/FN keys
and i hope this arch Linux can be compatible with my Samsung Netbook

Use google with the site option to search. (It works better than the forum search.)
When I tried, google turned up https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Samsung_N150. It doesn't seem to cover your netbook specifically but perhaps there's something useful there.
Here's the category page for samsung: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Category:Samsung.
Last edited by cfr (2012-08-11 00:17:11)

Arch Linux minimum requirements and recommended?

I'm setting up my shop and I need to know the minimum requirements for Arch Linux. Processor speed? Hard drive space? I know that the RAM is 64MB...

Taken from the installation guide
What You Will Need
* a working knowledge of Linux and your system, especially your
hardware
* Arch Linux installation media (see the mirror list)
+ Arch Linux Install CD
* an i686-based or x86-64 computer (PPro, Pentium 2 or higher, Athlon/Duron,
etc. Note that AMD K6, Transmeta Crusoe, CyrixIII, and VIA-C3 are
NOT supported.)
* 128 MB RAM
* some time to kill
hope that helps

UArch - arch linux for embeded and old machines

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for