UD - Stock posting of materials handled with HU

Hello Masters,
I have one scenario and need your help for same.
Material will be received in storage location with HU management active. (Example: 60 pcs are received as GR against PO) According to HU definition, system will create handling units (2 HUs are created, one with 50 pcs and another with 10 pcs). As material master will have inspection type 01 active, system will create inspection lot. After quality inspection I found 5 pcs with defects and needs to be scrapped but when I go for 'Inspection Lot Stock' tab in UD there is no option of splitting HU. I can post goods only in term of HU and not material quantity.
So my query is, how inspection lot quantity can be splited and posted partially into scrap and unrestricted?
I hope I was clear enough in explaining my query but in case any other information is required then please let me know.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Devang

Thanks Luke for your reply.
Is there any exit available which can allow splitting of HU during UD-stock posting?
As there can be many instances where material will be handled with HU and though in actual material will be removed (unpacked) from HU for inspection, to perform same in sytem can be skipped if system split HU during UD-stock posting and create new HU in background according to qty moved to different stocks.
I hope I was able to explain possible scenario.
Please let me know if you any such exit which can help in mapping such scnarios.
Thank you in advance,
Devang

Similar Messages

  • Stock Posting does not tally with Journal Entry

    Hi Mentors,
    I currently trying to see the cause of a particular issue with the JE being created by Stock Posting.
    After scavenging the forums, I came across SAP Note 1525960.
    Symptom
    On creating Inventory Posting in locked Posting Period, system gives error message 'Period is
    locked for new data [Message 131-107]'. Keep the window open, go to Posting Periods to
    change the Period Status to 'Unlocked', and then click on 'Reconcile' again. Inventory Posting
    is successfully added.
    The Transaction Value in the Inventory Audit Report is correct. However the Debit / Credit
    amounts in the Journal Entry of Inventory Posting are doubled.
    The note was created in 2010, filed under SAP Business One 2007. I tried to replicate it, and it holds true for our system, which is currently 2004B.
    When I tried to explain the SAP note to our accountant, she said that she did not encounter the error message, since she was the one controlling the period.
    So my question is, if there any other factors that could influence the change in the posting of the JE such that the variance being posted in the JE is more than the actual amount(as verified against "Inventory Posting List" and OINM)? 
    Some facts about our Finance department's practices.
    They enter the "Stock Posting" a month later.
    E.G. Stock Posting for Oct2011 Stock Variance
    System Date: Nov 16, 2011
    Stock Posting - Posting Date: Oct 31, 2011
    Thanks in advance!
    Sean

    Hi Sir Gordon,
    I already checked using your suggested query:
    SELECT * from oinm
    WHERE NegInvAdjs != 0
    found in this [thread|Re: Diffe Amount posting in Same document].
    Unfortunately, 2004B does not have the column "NegInvAdjs". The query failed to execute.
    Thank you for the guidance,
    Sean

  • Post Process Event Handler ----Unique Constraint Violation--Create User

    Hi Evryone..
    I am creating the user using the create user request template and there is one level of approval for this.
    I have one pre process event handler which populates one field A and one post process event handler which updates some 3 fields in the user form .
    In request template itself we had placed value as "ABC" for field B and this field B will be overridden in the post process event handler with Value as "XYZ" .
    Now when i raise the request the user is getting created in OIM but the value XYZ is not getting replaced in the field B.
    Below are the errors which i got in the logs while executing post process event handler :
    <Mar 28, 2012 10:25:58 AM CDT> <Warning> <oracle.iam.callbacks.common> <IAM-2030146> <[CALLBACKMSG] Are applicable policies present for this async eventhandler ? : false>
    <Mar 28, 2012 10:25:59 AM CDT> <Warning> <org.eclipse.persistence.session.oim> <BEA-000000> <
    Exception [EclipseLink-4002] (Eclipse Persistence Services - 2.1.3.v20110304-r9073): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException
    Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (DEV_OIM.UK_UAR_ATTR_NAME_VALUE) violated
    Error Code: 1
    Call: INSERT INTO USR_ATTRIBUTE_RESERVATIONS (UAR_RESERVATION_KEY, UAR_ATTRIBUTE_NAME, CREATED_BY, CREATED_ON, DATA_LEVEL, UAR_REQUEST_ID, UAR_RESERVED_VALUE, UPDATED_BY, UPDATED_ON) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    bind => [10, User Login, null, null, null, 10, DUMMY14, null, null]
    Query: InsertObjectQuery([email protected]658269)
    Exception at usrIntf.updateUser IAM-3050128 : Cannot reserve user attribute User Login with value DUMMY14 in OIMDB. Corresponding request ID is 10.:User Login:DUMMY14:10
    I checked reservations table and there are no records in that table.
    Has any one faced this issue..if so how it can be resolved..

    Are you trying to update the User ID? As far as I know during create user requests, OIM reserves the user login as it goes through approval and you cannot update that directly I think. I haven't tried it but can you tell me which fields you are prepopulating and which are you updating? Are there any OOTB fields in this or UDF?
    -Bikash

  • Usage Decision Stock Posting

    Dear All,
    I have following queries which needs to be clarified.
    1. In the results recording level after recording we give valuation as Accepted or Rejected. But what ever the valuation (Accepted/ Rejected) we give in results recording, in the usage decision level we can give valuation as whatever we like. whats the relationship between results recording level valuation and usage decision level valuation?
    2. How do i make in the usage decision if i give valuation as rejected quantity to be posted to Scrap or stay in Quality Inspection until re inspection is done? If i have to maintain a status profile for that can some one detail the steps?
    Thanks and Regards,
    DTD

    1. In the results recording level after recording we give valuation as Accepted or Rejected. But what ever the valuation (Accepted/ Rejected) we give in results recording, in the usage decision level we can give valuation as whatever we like. whats the relationship between results recording level valuation and usage decision level valuation?
    Hi
    There is no relation between RR ,DR & UD which you take.
    as you rightly said even if RR valuation is Reject you can Accept lot in UD.
    This is std sap
    if you want that after any char  is rejected then UD should be rejected then use
    user exit:
    QEVA0010 UD: Usage decision check
    2. How do i make in the usage decision if i give valuation as rejected quantity to be posted to Scrap or stay in Quality Inspection until re inspection is done? If i have to maintain a status profile for that can some one detail the steps?
    The simplest way you can do create a selected set with code AH: Hold QI lot.
    This means UD is taken but stock posting is still pending with QI
    Status profile will help you but this will make thinks more complecated.
    Regards
    Sujit

  • Inspection Lot with Zero stock posting qty

    Dear QM Consultants,
    We have come across following scenario,
    1.     Repetitive manufacturing
    2.     Material has inspection type 04 and Z04. Preferred inspection type is not ticked. Z04 inspection type has been assigned to inspection lot 04.
    3.     Production GR done by 131 movement
    4.     Inspection lot generated with reference to 131 movement type. Lot for inspection type 04 is created.
    5.     Inspection lot qty in QA32 it shows correctly as that of GR qty.
    6.     But when we click on UD, in stock posting tab, qty to be posted it shows as ZERO. So no qty is available for stock posting.
    Has anybody came across such scenario? Is this any bug? Any SAP note for this?
    Best Regards,
    Anand Rao

    Dear Sujit, Thanks for so prompt reply,
    Basically this is a complex case,
    1.     See we have set Posting Proposal in Usage Decision as u2018To unrestricted useu2019 in selected sets for usage decision. That means we need not every time go to stock posting tab. The moment we select ACC UD code it automatically posts the stock to unrestricted use.
    2.     Now, what has happed, by 131 movement declaration, backflush happened with 261 movement for child parts.
    3.     Inspection lots with inspection type 04 were created. (Here we did not note whether the stock was posted in quality inspection or in unrestricted use)
    4.     Now the requirement is to cancel 131 movement document. Kindly note UD were not given up to this moment.
    5.     Now through MFBF, user did document specific reversal. As a result of which and as per my knowledge 132 movement should happen and 262 should also happen. At the same time inspection lot status should be set to LTCA. But in actual case 132 movement happened and 262 did not. Surprisingly inspection lot did not set to LTCA status. It remained in REL mode only.
    6.     After this document specific reversal, user gave UD to these inspection lots without noticing where the stock was lying.(in unrestricted or in quality inspection). So the lot status set to UD   ICCO SPCO STUP after giving usage decision.
    7.     Now while doing reverse engineering that why 262 movement did not happen, we came to know that no 321 movement happened for the inspection lots which were generated with reference 131 movement document
    8.     Also, qty to be posted it shows ZERO as explained in my earlier post.
    9.     When we display 132 movement document through MIGO, in where tab it shows stock type as Quality inspection. That means stock was lifted from QI for 132 movement.
    In short  it cannot be predicted where the stock was actually posted whether in QI or in unrestricted use. But yes the post to inspection stock tick has been ticked in material master.
    Can you help further in this regard?
    Best Regards
    Anand Rao

  • Stock Take Posting does not balance with Stock Take Variance

    Hi Experts,
    We have a client that has completed and posted a stock take and the result from the variance report is not the same as the total of the stock take journal.
    For example the total gain of the stock take was R839.13 in value
    The stock take journal show a total gain of R2216.89 in value.
    I  run a audit report of the warehouse and the total qty and value match to the variance report of a total gain of R839.13
    I have also checked that the price source for whs stock posting is at item costs which calculates to the same total value of R839.13
    The stock take posting posts a ST Journal and you are not able to drill down into where the figure originates from.
    So it makes it very difficult to investigate or determine why there is a difference.
    Please can you assist with possible solutions or reasons to determine why there is a variance between the variance report and the stock take posting?
    Regards
    Christine Ward

    Dear Mr Boshard,
    In order to know the value of the stock taking in Business One you can check the field 'COUNTED' in OITW.
    Therefore, if you compare the counted and the onhand quantity before doing the inventory posting but after the stock taking you will find which items had more quantity at the moment of the stock taking than now.
    Please, try this query:
    SELECT T0.[ItemCode], T0.[WhsCode] FROM OITW T0 WHERE T0.[Counted] >  T0.[OnHand]
    Do not hesitate to come back if you still need help.
    Regards,
    Marcella Rivi
    SAP Business one Forums Team

  • Issues with Post Process Event Handler in oim11g

    Hi I am trying to trigger a post process event handler to set middle name but couldn't succeed.
    can you please point out the mistakes if there are any?
    This is the Java code.
    package oim.eventhandler;
    import java.io.Serializable;
    import java.util.HashMap;
    import oim.util.FROLogger;
    import oracle.iam.identity.usermgmt.vo.User;
    import oracle.iam.platform.context.ContextAware;
    import oracle.iam.platform.kernel.spi.PostProcessHandler;
    import oracle.iam.platform.kernel.vo.AbstractGenericOrchestration;
    import oracle.iam.platform.kernel.vo.BulkEventResult;
    import oracle.iam.platform.kernel.vo.BulkOrchestration;
    import oracle.iam.platform.kernel.vo.EventResult;
    import oracle.iam.platform.kernel.vo.Orchestration;
    public class setmiddlename implements PostProcessHandler {
         public void initialize(HashMap<String, String> arg0) {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
         public boolean cancel(long arg0, long arg1,
                   AbstractGenericOrchestration arg2) {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
              return false;
         public void compensate(long arg0, long arg1,
                   AbstractGenericOrchestration arg2) {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
         * public EventResult execute(long arg0, long arg1, Orchestration arg2) { //
         * TODO Auto-generated method stub return null; }
         public BulkEventResult execute(long arg0, long arg1, BulkOrchestration arg2) {
              // TODO Auto-generated method stub
              return null;
         public EventResult execute(long processId, long eventId,
                   Orchestration orchestration) {
              HashMap<String, Serializable> parameters = orchestration.getParameters();
              // If the middle name is empty set the first letter of the first name as the middle initial
              String middleName = getParamaterValue(parameters, "Middle Name");
              if (middleName.trim().length()>0) {
              String firstName = getParamaterValue(parameters, "First Name");
              middleName = firstName.substring(0,1);
              orchestration.addParameter("Middle Name", middleName);
              return new EventResult();
         private String getParamaterValue(HashMap<String, Serializable> parameters, String key) {
              String value = (parameters.get(key) instanceof ContextAware)
              ? (String) ((ContextAware) parameters.get(key)).getObjectValue()
              : (String) parameters.get(key);
              return value;
    ################ PostProcessEventHandlers.XML#############
    <eventhandlers xmlns="http://www.oracle.com/schema/oim/platform/kernel" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.oracle.com/schema/oim/platform/kernel orchestration-handlers.xsd">
    <!-- Custom validation event handlers -->
    <!-- Custom preprocess event handlers -->
    <action-handler
    class="oim.eventhandler.setmiddlename"
    entity-type="User"
    operation="CREATE"
    name="setmiddlename"
    stage="postprocess"
    order="1000"
    sync="TRUE"/>
    </eventhandlers>
    ################ plugin.xml##############
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <oimplugins>
    <plugins pluginpoint="oracle.iam.platform.kernel.spi.EventHandler">
    <plugin pluginclass="oim.eventhandler.setmiddlename" version="1.0" name="setmiddlename"/>
    </plugins>
    </oimplugins>
    ################ weblogic.properties##############
    wls_servername=oim_server1
    application_name=OIMMetadata
    metadata_from_loc=/data1/oim_install/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_IDM1/server/temp/import/metadata/custom/PostProcess
    metadata_files=/metadata/custom/PostProcess/PostProcessEventHandlers.xml
    application_version=11.1.1.3.0
    And the PostProcessEventHandlers.zip contains lib\PostProcess.jar
    both PostProcessEventHandlers.zip and PostProcessEventHandlers.xml are placed in the "metadata_from_loc"
    The registration was successful and I could see the entries in the PLUGINS table
    ID: oim.eventhandler.setmiddlename
    TYPE:     oracle.iam.platform.kernel.spi.EventHandler
    VERSION:     1.0
    NAME:     setmiddlename
    ZIPID:     23
    and PLUGIN_METADATA does not contain any values
    PLUGIN_ZIP contains ZIPID as 23 and ZIP as (BLOB)
    Did I miss anything?
    what is the mistake that I am doing?
    Edited by: 883725 on Sep 9, 2011 2:30 AM
    Edited by: 883725 on Sep 9, 2011 2:31 AM

    I am getting this error when running weblogicDeleteMetadata.sh.
    I have set the OIM Home and Weblogic home. Though Import and export works absolutely fine.
    Any other way where I can connect directly to DB and delete the contents?
    +Please enter your username [weblogic] :weblogic+
    +Please enter your password [welcome1] :+
    +Please enter your server URL [t3://localhost:7001] :t3://localhost:10070+
    Connecting to t3://localhost:10070 with userid weblogic ...
    Successfully connected to Admin Server 'AdminServer' that belongs to domain 'IDM_domain'.
    Warning: An insecure protocol was used to connect to the
    server. To ensure on-the-wire security, the SSL port or
    Admin port should be used instead.
    Location changed to domainRuntime tree. This is a read-only tree with DomainMBean as the root.
    For more help, use help(domainRuntime)
    Problem invoking WLST - Traceback (innermost last):
    File "/data1/oim_install/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_IDM1/server/bin/weblogicDeleteMetadata.py", line 21, in ?
    File "/data1/oim_install/Oracle/Middleware/oracle_common/common/wlst/mdsWLSTCommands.py", line 109, in deleteMetadata
    File "/data1/oim_install/Oracle/Middleware/oracle_common/common/wlst/mdsWLSTCommands.py", line 574, in executeAppRuntimeMBeanOperation
    File "/data1/oim_install/Oracle/Middleware/oracle_common/common/wlst/mdsWLSTCommands.py", line 713, in saveStackAndRaiseException
    WLSTException: MDS-00001: exception in Metadata Services layerMDS-91009: Operation "deleteMetadata" failure. Use dumpStack() to view the full stacktrace.

  • Unable to change stock posting date at usage decision while inspecting HUs

    If we were using materials without WMS it's simple: thereu2019s a button in the screen for stock posting by which we're able to change document date and posting date; but we're using WM and the screen is slightly different: the button I'm referring it's gone!
    So, how to change the posting date at posting stock in QA11 when we're using handle units? Some end-user told me that in version 4.7 this was possible. I don't think so ...unless there was something customized at WM IMG...or maybe they were using a USER EXIT to bring a pop-up window for this (I'm starting to believe that this was implemented..). This is the first time I work with HUs, so I don't know how to manage this.
    Anyone?
    Seba
    Edited by: Sebastian Sniezyk on Apr 3, 2009 10:16 AM

    I solved it in this topic: Changing posting date at usage decision for handle units. How?

  • Inventory Valuated Stock Value is not matching with R/3

    Dear Friends,
    we are in a big mess.Needed your help urgently
    We are in sap netweaver 2004s.We are implementing the standard business content only for one of our client.We have loaded the Inventory data into BW by following "How to handle the Inventory Management" document.
    We have loaded the inventory data into 0IC_C03 using standard transferrules and update rules.
    The sequence we followed as:
    IN R/3
    Filled the setup tables for during the posting free time(non-business hours)
    Stock intialization
    Material Movements
    Evaluations
    IN BW
    We had loaded the data into only 0IC_C03 cube using standard update rules(no changes done)
    2LIS_03_BX-Generate intial stock with no marker update unchecked
    2LIS_03_BF-Full update with no marker update checked
    2LIS_03_UM-Full update with no marker update checked
    When we compared the data between R/3 and BW they are many materials "Valuated Stock Value" is not matching with R/3.For some materials value is matching with R/3 but for some other materials its not matching with R/3.Some materials are showing the negative figures for Valuated Stock Value.
    But the valuated quantity value is exactly matching with R/3 for all the materials.
    We have tryed to many ways in the past 10 days to find out the solution.We have followd the notes 589024 and implemented the formula.But no luck so far.
    Needed your help..Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
    Please help us with your inputs.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Soujanya

    Hi Sudheer,
    No We haven't implemented this note.
    In start routine we already have the first start routine in the note.
    INSERT BEGIN
      loop at DATA_PACKAGE.
        if DATA_PACKAGE-stockcat eq 'V' or
           DATA_PACKAGE-stocktype eq 'V'.
          delete DATA_PACKAGE.
        endif.
      endloop.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0.
    INSERT END
    We should comment the above start routine and follow the remaining section as below?
    ==========================================================
    Notes:
    However, if you want a report of these consumption values, proceed as follows:
    1. Do not use the start routine listed above.
    2. Create two new key figures (cumulative values):
       1. Material consumption value (ZVERWERT, for example) with unit 0BASE_UOM
       2. Material consumption quantity (ZVERMENGE, for example) with unit 0LOC_CURRCY
    3. Include these in the InfoCube definition.
    4. Update these key figures from 2LIS_03_BF as follows:
    -> material consumption value:
    IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '100'   "Other Issues
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '101'   "Returns / Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '104'   "Material Transfer
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '105'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '106'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '110' ) "Issues from Stock
                                                "Transfers
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-bwapplnm EQ 'MM'
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = -1 * COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
    ELSEIF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '000'   "Other Receipts
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '001'   "Goods Receipt/Vendor
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '004'   "Material Transfer/"Receipt
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '005'   "Stock Adjustment InvD
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '006'   "Stock Adjustment Other
        OR COMM_STRUCTURE-processkey EQ '010' ) "Receipt from Stock
                                                "Transfer
    only movements which are relevant for stock control
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc <> 0
       AND COMM_STRUCTURE-stockcat EQ 'V'
       AND COMM_STRUCUTRE-stocktype EQ 'V'.
    result value of the routine
        RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    if the returncode is zero, the result will be updated
        RETURNCODE = 0.
      ELSE.
    if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
        RETURNCODE = 4.
      ENDIF.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
      ABORT = 0..
    -> material consumption quantity:
    The code is the same, but COMM_STRUCTURE-cpquabu replaces COMM_STRUCTURE-cppvlc.
    -> The characteristic value calculation is the same for the other key figures.
    5. Update these key figures from the 2LIS_03_UM in the same way.
    =======================================================

  • How to change the posting date in UD stock posting for a HU managed item?

    Hi,
    We are using Handling Unit managed items with QM activation. For a specific HU managed material, we wanted to post the stock on a previous date. We have created PO on a back date and made GR also on a back date. Now the problem is, the system has generated an inspection lot. Now while trying to do UD and stock posting, I do not see the "Doc" tab which we normally see in UD stock posting for normal inspection lots (non-HU managed items) for changing the date.
    I don't see any other way to change the posting date for the HU managed item in UD stock posting. Anyone can help please?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Madhavan Krishnamoorthy.

    I don't think you can.
    Craig

  • Report showing Total Stock of individual materials and not specific to Sloc

    Our requirement is to display the current Stock of every individual material with its description and not Storage location specific..
    We dont want the Stock specific to Storage Locations.We need the overall Stock of individual materials.
    Pls dont suggest
    MMBE Stock Overview
    MB52 List of Warehouse Stocks on Hand
    MB53 Display Plant Stock Availability
    MB54 Consignment Stocks
    MB5B Stocks for Posting Date
    MB5W List of Stock Values
    MC.1 INVCO: Plant Anal. Selection: Stock
    MC.5 INVCO: SLoc Anal. Selection, Stock
    MC.9 INVCO: Material Anal.Selection,Stock
    The above doesnt solve my purpose.
    Apperciating ur immediate response.
    Regards
    Zulfikar

    Hi Zulfikar Ali,
                          Develop a Z-Report with help of techinal consultant...........
    regards,
    Patil

  • QM/WM- LT05 Screen after QM stock posting

    Hi
    Is there anyway to trigger the LT05 screen appearing after a stock posting in the inspection lot ? We have it working when doing a partial UD using the follow-on action, but when we want to just pre-release part of the inspection lot we can't get the 321 movement from within QM to trigger this screen appearing.
    Any ideas ? Or do we need to do this via a user exit?
    thanks in advance.
    Al

    Well, i thought about your suggestion too. It seems a good alternative. Another option is during GR in quality inspection stock to create a TO towards a workcenter. But, like the sample bin solution you suggest, i still have no physical transfer of the sample quantity to the other storage location.
    The reason my client wants this is to have better insight in what stock is physically in which storage location. The storage location where the materials are tested is physically 100 km from the central warehouse. So the sample has to be shipped from the central warehouse (WM managed) towards the warehouse where they test the samples.
    As you describe we can put the sample in the storage bin in Q stock and wait for them to be approved and the post them to unrestriced use stock by the user decision. But still the physical transfer is not solved in my opinion. What am i missing?
    We have other non WM managed storage locations too which we supply from the central (WM) managed warehouse with materials (via MRP run). The (UB) purchase reqs result in a (UB) purchase order, then we convert them into a (NL) delivery with VL10B and create a shipment and a pick (transfer) order and ship them from the WM stor loc to the other non WM stor locs.

  • Cancel initial stock posting

    Dear Gurus,
    How can i cancel wrong initial stock posting,means i have posted the initial entry for MAT1 insted of MAT2.
    What are the effects if i do transfer posting MAT1 to MAT2 using Mvt 309?
    Would you pls help on this issue.
    Thanks in Advance
    Rgds,
    Jaggu

    Hello,
    You can try to use movement type 309
    The quantity is posted from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing material(MAT1) into unrestricted-use stock in the receiving material(MAT2).
    Prerequisite: both materials have the same stock keeping unit.
    Accounting document generated while using 309 Mvt.
    1.Debit - Inventory account of Material 1
    2.Credit - Inventory account of material 2
    Material to Material transfer is used when material changes its properties after certain period ( Mostly in case of chemical and pharmaceutical industry).
    Prerequisite for this is that material must be in unrestricted stock.and both materials should have same base unit of measure
    Eg: In chemical industry material to material is transferred in case of acid with more percentage is mixed into lesser percentage
    Hope it is helpful to you.
    Jason.

  • Cancellation of UD and re recording the results before stock posting

    Hello Friends,
    I am working with Handling unit functionality.
    Based on the goods receipt done against the production order system generated the inspection lot. I have done the result recording and then I did the usage decision and saved. I have not yet done the stock posting.
    Now the requirement is I want to change my results in result recording. System is not allowing me to change the results as the message is coming Usage decision is done. How can I cancel or reverse the usage decision so that I can do the result recording. Kindly advise?
    Note: I have done the UD but not yet done the stock posting.
    Regards,
    Narendra Bora

    33924 is the original note.
    Use caution with this, it is not supported by SAP and is not recommended to normally use this. 
    Typically, if you need to correct results, it is recommended that existing results be left and the UD made.  Then create a manual inspection lot for the material and enter in the corrected values.  Make the UD on that lot.  Than manually make any necessary inventory moves.
    FF

  • A/P invoice and stock posting

    Hi
    I have some issues with understanding the following:
    I have received some item without having issued a PO for them. For these items, master data exists .
    As common practice with a lot of suppliers, there is no Invoice attached to the shipping, only a delivery note.
    If I post the items to stock using 'Goods receipt' and use A/P invoice some days after when the invoice arrives, I have doubled the received quantity by posting the items to the stock twice.
    What is the solution to have the items posted to stock immediately for further usage and adding the A/P invoice later but without stock posting?
    Thanks
    Franz

    Hi Franz,
    When an AP Invoice is based on a Goods Receipt PO there will be no double posting, not for Warehouse quantites or in the accounting.
    An AP Invoice that is based on a Goods Receipt PO where nothing was changed between the Goods Receipt and the Invoice the AP Invoice will NOT post to stock. The stock posting was already done on the Goods Receipt.
    Most documents can be cancelled, either by basing a reverse documents or by cancelling. For every each one of them the quantities and accounts postings follow the logic of continuous stock.
    Goods Receipt PO -> Reversed by a Goods Return
    AP Invoice -> Reversed by an AP Credit Note.
    Please note that there are NO double entries anywhere when a document is based on another.
    I hope it helps.
    Jesper

Maybe you are looking for

  • MIRO reversal

    HI, all. I'm trying to do MR8M and it's show a message error M8534. Balance not zero: 10.680,40  debits: 1.298.391,75  credits: 1.309.072,15 Message no. M8534 Diagnosis The system has discovered a difference between the debits and credits. This diffe

  • Second RAM slot bad?

    Troubling issue with my 24" iMac (late 2008, 3GHz, nVidia 8800). With both RAM slots loaded, it crashes randomly in the first 15 minutes after boot. Sometimes this is a freeze, others the black "You must restart your computer" message. Regardless, af

  • Invoking taskflow dynamically on to dynamic Region from Tree Nodes

    Hello, I have a tree , each node represents application task flow want to invoke the corresponding task flow when node is clicked into same Dynamic Region, is it possible? Any idea will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Ram

  • Adobe Reader for iPad : Want highlighting function kept ON please!!

    I am using Adobe Reader for iPad. While studying .pdf files, I would like to keep the highlighting function on, until I'm done. That way I don't have to keep selecting it each time. Thanks!!!

  • Very Slow Performance After Failed Bootcamp Install

    Hello, Recently I went through a failed attempt at installing Windows 7 onto my Macbook Pro using boot camp. After this failure I decided to try again another day and used the boot camp assistant to remove the Windows partition. Ever since doing this