UGLY font rendering in Firefox

Hello, my font rendering in Firefox is very ugly. I don't know what to do
I installed ttf-google-fonts-git and also put 70-no-bitmaps.conf in my /etc/fonts/conf.d/ directory but this doesn't change anything. I reinstalled ttf-google-fonts-git and firefox but nothing.
Here is what I got : http://f.too.gy/font-rendering.png

(/etc/fonts/conf.d) Stewie $ ls
10-powerline-symbols.conf    57-dejavu-sans.conf
10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf    57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf
20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf 57-dejavu-serif.conf
20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf 60-latin.conf
20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf 65-fonts-persian.conf
20-unhint-small-vera.conf    65-nonlatin.conf
30-metric-aliases.conf    69-unifont.conf
30-urw-aliases.conf    70-no-bitmaps.conf
40-nonlatin.conf    75-yes-terminus.conf
42-luxi-mono.conf    80-delicious.conf
45-latin.conf    90-synthetic.conf
49-sansserif.conf    99pdftoopvp.conf
50-user.conf    README
51-local.conf

Similar Messages

Ugly fonts rendering with poppler-qt-lcd

Hello,
These patches don't work on my system.
All fonts rendering are beautiful, but pdf documents in okular are ugly.
I have tried ubuntu cairo patches without effects on this issue.
I have tried also to change hinting parameters in fontconfig without success.
Here is screenshots.
With extra/poppler-qt :
with aur/poppler-qt-lcd :
The rendering is worst with poppler-qt-lcd !
Anybody other has this issue ?
Thank you

I'm afraid this is a problem with the Cairo backend; the patches just create a bridge between the Qt bindings and the Cairo backend, and instruct Cairo to use subpixel rendering. Unfortunately, it doesn't always comply. Since Cairo 1.10 came out, more documents are affected. You'll notice the following comment was posted on AUR around the time Cairo 1.10 came out:
Sadly, it seems an increasing number of documents are not properly subpixel-rendered in the Cairo backend, even with these patches. I'm afraid that issue is for other people with more understanding of Cairo internals to solve. (See here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3307 ).

Strange font rendering in firefox

I have an svg file which has a very strange rendering in firefox the letters seem to be above each other while they're next to each other.
kindly check the link I attached, it includes:
1- the svg file
2-How it shows on firefox
3-How it shows on chrome "correct"
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/hi7uy3k79gk92to/AAAhDZKPZMSB94CqPeo0xgxCa?dl=0

This forum focuses more on end-user support. You can find more web development help on the unofficial [http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=25 mozillaZine Web Development board]. It's a separate site with separate registration.

[SOLVED] Firefox ugly font rendering

Hello,
straight to the point
Chrome:
http://i.imgur.com/GpjpYqo.png
Firefox:
http://i.imgur.com/PYH7pua.png
This happens only on some websites, and the workarounds found in the wiki articles[1] don't work for me.
I don't know if this is helpful, if you need more information just ask:
ls /etc/fonts/conf.d
10-autohint.conf 20-unhint-small-vera.conf 40-nonlatin.conf 51-local.conf 60-latin.conf 80-delicious.conf
20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf 29-replace-bitmap-fonts.conf 45-latin.conf 57-dejavu-sans.conf 65-fonts-persian.conf 90-synthetic.conf
20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf 30-metric-aliases.conf 49-sansserif.conf 57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf 65-nonlatin.conf README
20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf 30-urw-aliases.conf 50-user.conf 57-dejavu-serif.conf 69-unifont.conf
I don't have any fonts/local.conf nor .fonts.conf in ~.
Someone knows how to troubleshoot/resolve this?
Thanks
[1]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Firefox
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Firefox_Tweaks
Last edited by tilde (2013-04-17 08:44:32)

brebs wrote:
Looks like you want these fontconfig options, from Infinality's config:

<match target="font">
<edit name="embeddedbitmap" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
</match>

<match target="font">
<selectfont><rejectfont><pattern>
<patelt name="scalable"><bool>false</bool></patelt>
</pattern></rejectfont></selectfont>
</match>

<match target="font">
<edit name="prefer_outline"><bool>true</bool></edit>
</match>
Thanks for sharing this! Your solution works almost perfectly. However, I get regularly the following terminal output (warning messages):
Fontconfig warning: "local.conf", line 36: No <test> nor <edit> elements in <match>
...which Should be simple to fix. However, forgive me. I'm not very familiar with the code itself. Any quick help is appreciated.
The problematic code string states as follows:

<match target="font">
<selectfont><rejectfont><pattern>
<patelt name="scalable"><bool>false</bool></patelt>
</pattern></rejectfont></selectfont>
</match>

Ugly fonts after starting Firefox or Tor Browser

After starting Firefox or Tor Browser my fonts become ugly and broken in most windows: some symbols look strange.
Screenshot:
# fc-cache -f doesn't help
I have a laptop with mostly the same packages and configuration and I don't this problem with it

Yes. I use Xfce. This issue is related to all programs but it happens only after launching TorBrowser or Firefox and visiting some websites

Ugly font rendering in chromium 5.0.375.

Hi!,
The last update to chromim 5.0.375, the rendering fonts is too ugly, so I have to down to the previus version of package 5.0.342.
I probe settins de .Xdefaults system, but ignore me. Is anyone occur this issue ?.
I've a X64 System.
thanks in advance !!

alexk wrote:
edtler wrote:The last update to chromim 5.0.375, the rendering fonts is too ugly, so I have to down to the previus version of package 5.0.342.
I probe settins de .Xdefaults system, but ignore me. Is anyone occur this issue ?.
I have the same problem. Rolling back to 5.0.342 fixes it.
fsckd wrote:Maybe: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=98189
It looks like a different issue.
Could u please provide old package v5.0.342?

Fonts rendering incorrectly since update to Firefox 13.0.1

Since I updated to Firefox 13.0.1, any website using the Helvetica Neue font is rendering an outline font instead. I do have this font installed on my computer, and cannot uninstall it as I am a graphic designer and I use it all the time. Any change we can get a fix on this?
I just pasted one example, but even this page is doing it: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/new/desktop/d1/form?search=Fonts+rendering+incorrectly+since+update+to+Firefox+13.0.1. I also know Pinterest does it.

There may be a problem with the Helvetica Neue font if Firefox is using another font instead.
You can do a font test to see if you can identify corrupted font(s).
*http://browserspy.dk/fonts-flash.php?detail=1
You can use this extension to see which fonts are used for selected text.
*fontinfo: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/fontinfo/

Firefox-bin font rendering

If I use any of the firefox-bin packages in aur, or mozilla's official tar the font rendering is just terrible and doesn't folow my system at all. Is there anyway to make these versions of firefox render fonts properly?

The Firefox aurora and beta AUR packages use binary packages so Firefox is compiled differently than the default Arch packages. iirc, XULRunner is responsible for the font rendering. You would want to compile it to use the system's cairo library.

Weird font rendering glitch in firefox

Hi all,
When I look at this webpage in Firefox this is what I get:
Notice how every occurrence of "ff" and "ft" look weird.
This is Mozilla Firefox 13.0.1.
System & Xorg info:
knarf ~ > Xorg -version
X.Org X Server 1.12.3
Release Date: 2012-07-09
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux 3.4.4-3-ARCH x86_64
Current Operating System: Linux paf 3.4.4-3-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jul 3 14:36:44 UTC 2012 x86_64
Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda3 ro
Build Date: 09 July 2012 03:59:39PM
Current version of pixman: 0.26.2
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Font-related installed packages:
knarf ~ > pacman -Qs ttf
local/ttf-dejavu 2.33-3
Font family based on the Bitstream Vera Fonts with a wider range of characters
local/ttf-freefont 20120503-1
Set of free outline fonts covering the Unicode character set
knarf ~ > pacman -Qs font
local/fontconfig 2.8.0-2
A library for configuring and customizing font access
local/fontforge 20120119-1
Outline and bitmap font editor
local/fontsproto 2.1.2-1
X11 font extension wire protocol
local/freetype2 2.4.10-1
TrueType font rendering library
local/libfontenc 1.1.1-1
X11 font encoding library
local/libxfont 1.4.5-1
X11 font rasterisation library
local/libxft 2.3.1-1
FreeType-based font drawing library for X
local/ttf-dejavu 2.33-3
Font family based on the Bitstream Vera Fonts with a wider range of characters
local/ttf-freefont 20120503-1
Set of free outline fonts covering the Unicode character set
local/xorg-bdftopcf 1.0.3-2 (xorg xorg-apps)
Convert X font from Bitmap Distribution Format to Portable Compiled Format
local/xorg-font-util 1.3.0-1 (xorg-fonts xorg)
X.Org font utilities
local/xorg-font-utils 7.6-3
Transitional package depending on xorg font utilities
local/xorg-fonts-alias 1.0.2-2
X.org font alias files
local/xorg-fonts-encodings 1.0.4-3 (xorg-fonts xorg)
X.org font encoding files
local/xorg-fonts-misc 1.0.1-2
X.org misc fonts
local/xorg-mkfontdir 1.0.7-1 (xorg xorg-apps)
Create an index of X font files in a directory
local/xorg-mkfontscale 1.1.0-1 (xorg-apps xorg)
Create an index of scalable font files for X

ewaller wrote:It is interesting to note those combinations are typographic ligatures. I'll bet two credits that is not a coincidence.
I bet my credits the fault is within the Calibri font.
You can do a font substitution for Calibri. I made the change for all users. Before anyone does this they might check, from the command line, what font is being used for Calibri: 'fc-match Calibri'
In /etc/fonts/conf.avail/ I added the file, 39-no-calibri.conf:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>

<match target="pattern" name="family">
<test name="family" qual="any">
<string>Calibri</string>
</test>
<edit mode="assign" name="family">
<string>Arial</string>
<string>Liberation Sans</string>
<string>sans-serif</string>
</edit>
</match>
</fontconfig>
Then I symlinked to it from /etc/fonts/conf.d/:
# pwd
/etc/fonts/conf.d
# ln -s /etc/fonts/conf.avail/39-no-calibri.conf
Finally, I updated the font cache with 'fc-cache -vf'.

Firefox/Thunderbird Font Rendering changed after upgrade of xulrunner

Hi guys,
I experienced a problem with font rendering in the mentioned applications after upgrading xulrunner from 1.9.2.10-1 to 1.9.2.10-2 today. It seems like font smoothing/subpixel rendering does not work as before. After downgrading to 1.9.2.10-1, it worked as expected again.
To make it more clearly, here is a comparison shot of the two different renderings. The top one is before, the bottom one after the upgrade. You can see that the font at the top is rendered more smoothly.
And here is a difference image:
Is anything known about changes which could cause this?
<edit>I have to correct this. The rendering in thunderbird was obviously not changed by the xulrunner upgrade, but by a separate thunderbird upgrade from 3.1.4-1 to 3.1.4-2.
<edit2>Additional information: I have the cleartype versions of freetype2, cairo and libxft installed, if that matters.
Last edited by Singul (2010-09-28 16:40:18)

Although I am empathetic to the hard (and really great) job the arch devs do, I want to voice my overall agreement with softtower on this issue. Fonts have been an off and on problem for me with arch since the beginning. I understand the devs are doing the best they can, especially when the actual problem is with the moz. devs. But fonts are the major way most users interact with the system, and I can tell you that almost nothing is more aggravating, to me at least, to suddenly "upgrade" and get presented with those really crappy fonts out of the blue. Just saying I understand the frustration, and I think he makes some good points about shipping broken packages and "blaming" it on upstream. If they're broken - don't use them! if possible. "Progress" that breaks stuff isn't really progress, imo.
hokasch wrote:
Don't quite get what the fuzz is all about, my fonts look as crisp as ever (on a laptop lcd), the update changed absolutely nothing for me. I never used "fixed" versions of anything, can't really remember how I set up the fonts when I did this installation though (font config advice on the wiki I guess).
It is not the repo's maintainers job to keep packages synced up with any "fixed" packages in AUR, that is your own responsibility, and bitching about it won't help you any.
Just pointing out that comments like these aren't really helpful, imho. So you didn't have the problem - that's good to know, but the "fuzz" is about the fact that some of us *DO* have the problem.
It typically doesn't show up on laptops, btw, only standalone LCDs for some reason (has always been the case for me, at least, with both LCDs and laptops, where the laptop never had the problem). So again, the fuss is that a major usability function got broken from an upgrade that shouldn't get broken, and imo it raises some good, if admittedly difficult to resolve, points, philosophical points, etc. about the packaging and upgrade process,

Font rendering in KDE 4

I recently installed Arch (switching from Ubuntu 8.10) and decided to give KDE a try. So far I'm mostly happy, but the font rendering isn't working so well. There are two problems: the first is that fonts all look too thin. The second is that most of them are way too big! (For some reason they render properly in some places, like some sites online [e.g. Gmail], but they're way off in most applications.)
I've tried the suggestions under "LCD" packages from the Arch fonts wiki, along with this guy's suggestions for setting up fontconfig. I've also tried (variously) changing my DPI settings for KDM and System Settings -> Appearance -> Fonts (with aliasing anti-aliasing enabled or with system settings, and forcing the DPI to 120 or disabled).
Oh, and I have a 15.4" widescreen 1680x1050 LCD monitor, which I think is (supposed to be) 129 DPI.
What can I do to get fonts to look the way they should?

hunterthomson wrote:
OK, you problem is not with KDE. This weirded me out when I moved to Archlinux from Ubuntu too. In Archlinux you have to install all the fonts you want to use. The default fonts suck. So, You just need to install better fonts. You want the TrueType Fonts "ttf". You can install them with pacman
Try this to list all the font packages available.
sudo pacman -Ss font
These are some ones that are good
ttf-dejavu
ttf-freefont
ttf-liberation
you instal them you just do...
sudo pacman -S ttf-liberation ttf-freefont ttf-dejavu
Then you will want to open up the Konfiguration thing that you change the KDE configurations settings in and then change the fonts in there.
Thanks for the tip! I installed those (and a few others), and I definitely like (for instance) FreeSans better than the default Sans that most everything was using. Most things look better; I think I'm going to have to tweak the hinting a bit still, but this is definitely an improvement. Many of the things I thought were rendering related were actually just bad fonts, like you said.
There are just a couple of problems remaining that I'm hoping will be just as easy to conquer... First, some websites are still rendering horribly. Take a look at this screenshot of this site, followed by this one:
At first I figured it was a problem with Firefox (I know GTK doesn't always play nicely with KDE), but it looks the same in Konqueror. A quick peek at the HTML for the first seems to say that it's asking for Verdana, Arial, or Helvetica...and I have Verdana and Arial installed. (The second one calls for a ridiculous font, Palatino Linotype, which I don't have.) Either way, though, the pages look totally wrong (the font is much too large) compared to any other machine I've seen it on (even my previous Ubuntu setup). Does anyone know what's going on?
One other example of font size weirdness: the digital clock plasmoid. Here's what it looks like:
The odd thing is that it looked like this for a while when I first installed Arch and KDE, and then played nicely for a few days...and now it's back to looking ugly.
And finally, here are my font settings in System Settings:
(And yes, I've rebooted since installing the new fonts and changing font settings, just in case.)
Any more ideas?

[NEARLY SOLVED] font rendering in gtk apps problem after last upgrade

Im' using KDE, cairo-lcd, libxft-lcd... my fonts looked beautifully, but now they look horrible...
After last upgrade my gtk apps (firefox, thunderbird) render fonts in an ugly way...
I've tried to revert to pango 1.16.5 with no lucky result (the same problem)...
here is the log:
[2007-08-19 14:56] upgraded bind (9.4.1_P1-2 -> 9.4.1_P1-3)
[2007-08-19 14:56] upgraded glib2 (2.14.0-2 -> 2.14.0-3)
[2007-08-19 14:56] upgraded gnupg2 (2.0.5-1 -> 2.0.6-1)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded gtk2 (2.10.14-2 -> 2.10.14-3)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded kernel26ck (2.6.22.2.ck1-1 -> 2.6.22.3.ck1-1)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded libdownload (1.1-1 -> 1.1-2)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded libevent (1.3b-1 -> 1.3d-1)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded libxtst (1.0.2-1 -> 1.0.3-1)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded nvidia-ck (100.14.11-2 -> 100.14.11-3)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded sip (4.6-1 -> 4.7-1)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded pyqt (3.17.2-1 -> 3.17.3-1)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xf86-input-joystick (1.2.2-1 -> 1.2.3-1)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xorg-server-utils (1.0.4-1 -> 1.0.4-2)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xorg-utils (1.0.2-2 -> 1.0.2-4)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xorg-xdm (1.1.5-1 -> 1.1.6-1)
[2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xterm (225-1 -> 229-1)
[2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded cpio (2.8-1 -> 2.9-1)
[2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded ed (0.5-3 -> 0.8-1)
[2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded initscripts (2007.08-1 -> 2007.08-2)
[2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded intltool (0.36.0-1 -> 0.36.1-1)
[2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded libarchive (2.2.5-1 -> 2.2.6-1)
[2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded man-pages (2.60-1 -> 2.64-1)
[2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded pciutils (2.2.4-2 -> 2.2.6-1)
[2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded readline (5.2-2 -> 5.2-3)
[2007-08-22 00:16] upgraded gdbm (1.8.3-3 -> 1.8.3-4)
[2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded kernel26 (2.6.22.3-1 -> 2.6.22.4-2)
[2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded lcms (1.16-1 -> 1.17-1)
[2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded libice (1.0.2-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
[2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded libxrender (0.9.2-1 -> 0.9.3-1)
[2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded procinfo (18-3 -> 19-1)
[2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded xorg-apps (1.0.2-4 -> 1.0.3-1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded kernel26 (2.6.22.4-2 -> 2.6.22.4-2.1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded librsvg (2.18.0-1 -> 2.18.1-1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded libxpm (3.5.6-1 -> 3.5.7-1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded libxaw (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded makedev (3.8.3-1 -> 3.23-1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded mcpp (2.6-1 -> 2.6.4-1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded naim (0.11.8.2.1-1 -> 0.11.8.3.1-1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded nfs-utils (1.0.12-2 -> 1.0.12-3)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded pam (0.81-4 -> 0.99.8.1-3.1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded pango (1.16.5-1 -> 1.18.0-1)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded sox (13.0.0-1 -> 13.0.0-2)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded xorg-apps (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.3-2)
[2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded xtrans (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
[2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded glibc (2.6.1-1 -> 2.6.1-2)
[2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded bftpd (1.9-1 -> 2.0-1)
[2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded gcc (4.2.1-3 -> 4.2.1-3.1)
[2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded gtk-doc (1.8-2 -> 1.8-3)
[2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded hal-info (0.20070618-1 -> 0.20070725-1)
[2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded perl-xml-simple (2.16-2 -> 2.18-1)
[2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded icon-naming-utils (0.8.2-2 -> 0.8.5-1)
[2007-08-25 15:26] upgraded kernel26 (2.6.22.4-2.1 -> 2.6.22.5-1)
[2007-08-25 15:27] upgraded kernel26ck (2.6.22.3.ck1-1 -> 2.6.22.5.ck1-1)
[2007-08-25 15:27] upgraded libgnomeprint (2.18.0-1 -> 2.18.1-1)
[2007-08-25 22:41] removed libgnomeprintui (2.18.0-1)
[2007-08-25 22:41] removed libgnomeprint (2.18.1-1)
i dunno what happened...
plz, someone help me
regards
Last edited by saneone (2007-08-30 18:11:32)

Bogart wrote:
I think the spacing now is correct, while before it was wrong. The only "problem" is that you got used to a bad font rendering, and now that it has changed for better you feel like it's different and don't like it.
Really, *most* of the problems that people find in Linux's fonts are just because they are used to the awful default fonts from Windows XP. Yes, people can even get used to those fonts and believe they're good!!! And when they see correct fonts in Linux they think they're bad...
What I would do is remove the MS TTF fonts. They work bad in Windows and worse in Linux. You should use Bitstream Vera or DejaVu if you want good quality fonts (especially in web pages).
But, then again, you might think that they look wrong just because you're not used to it... Oh, well...
What does correct font / correct spacing mean ?
IMO, that doesn't make any sense, because that's a totally subjective matter, like many other things in this world.
BTW, I love how fonts look in Windows, and I think that must be the only thing MS got right. Thus, I'm using ms fonts in linux, and a rendering as close as possible (no autohinting or antialiasing or subpixel rendering).
Similarly, I could find a woman beautiful that you would find ugly or just average. We are all different, and it's better that way

Font Rendering Got Bad After 32.0 Update

After the recent update, the font started to get badly rendered. Kind of blurry with jagged edges and transparent parts. It used to be okay D:
Sometimes it becomes okay for a moment as I scroll down on pages, and sometimes when I stop scrolling, the font stays as it is; as if there are specific positions for the text to render properly. However, not all of the fonts are affected. Only the ones inside the scroll area.
On times that the font renders properly, the bookmarks font, title bar, and tab names are unaffected and still appear not-smooth. Same thing does not happen on other browsers. All my other system fonts look okay; it's really just Firefox.
Restarting Firefox = didn't work
Restarting Computer = didn't work
Tried setting up Clear Type = didn't work
Tried enabling and disabling Hardware Acceleration on Firefox = didn't work
Tried enabling and disabling the Graphics card itself = didn't work
Tried just about all of the suggestions I found on Google = none worked
Tried complete uninstall and re-install of Firefox 32.0 = didn't work
Graphics Driver are updated ~
Windows is updated ~
I'm using Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6800
I fixed it by downgrading to Firefox 31 which makes me sure that 32.0 is the culprit. As I was about to send the message on top; I tried downgrading as my last resort and it worked. Now I'm only sending this as a report. I am hoping you'll figure out what caused it because I am quite strict (OC) that everything in my PC must remain updated >_<; thus I want to use Firefox 32.0 as much as possible.

No one to help on this ??????

Font rendering quality in Illustrator is terrible!

What the heck rode Adobe when they implemented the new font engine?
Why, oh why is Apple's font rendering so much better? And why wouldn't Adobe use something that's already readily available on the mac platform?
I have a huge problem mocking up website layouts in Illustrator. Type looks much better in Firefox or Safari. How come, huh?

I believe this is the result of sub-pixel antialiasing (SPAA), which optimizes text appearance on laptops. Illustrator's rasterizing doesn't SPAA, which is fine for most CRTs, print, and LCD displays that might be rotated.
It's more a case of the OS being savvy enough to tell what kind of display you have and antialias appropriately. Illustrator's rendering engine does need to support SPAA.

Font rendering OS X issues

Hi people,
I baught a MacBook Air and I am new to OS X. I have this machine since 1 month and I simply cannot get used to the font rendering of OS X. I thought I get used to it after a while, but I don't. I feel like I have body lotion in my eyes all the time, fonts are really blurry and I can only work on that machine for some time. On my windows machine I worked all day long, with no such problems, but not in OS X. It is set to native resolution and I already set the font smoothing to 1, but this is still not enough, while turning font smoothing completely off makes everything look very ugly.
I wonder why no one ever mentioned that in reviews, etc.? Does it not bother mac users? However, is there some other option (besides scaling down to lower resolution)? I have headache almost every evening, so this is really a problem to me.
Thanks in advance.

Do any other applications behave like that? Or just these two?

UGLY font rendering in Firefox

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for