Unable to create masterdata ( org Units, Position )etc.

Hi
While creating the masterdata(Position, Org Units) in development client, I am getting an error "Client 220 has status 'not modifiable'". I have tried through scc4 and se06, but it will make complete client as modifiable. I want the configuration part as not modifiable, only it should allow to create the masterdata ( using T codes PO13, PO10 etc.).
Please suggest
Regards
Anup

Hello Anup,
Check transaction code: OOCR "TRSP CORR should be 'X' then go to SCC4 tcode and select radio button 'No Change allowed'
and also ask your Basis team to apply SAP NOTE: 0000163897
hope it help u...
regards

Similar Messages

Organizational structure(org unit , position etc)

Dear friends ,
I hope all are doing gr8.
i just created my org structure using PPOC_OLD for the HR purpose.
I hope , i can view this in PPOSE.
but in my case i cant do it.
Im in to gr8 dilemma , is PPOC_OLD suits for HR.
But PPOC_OLD is amazing to work.
Can any1 clear this out.
cheers
sakthi

Hai..
yes u can view it

Unable to create reference: org.omg.CORBA.OBJ_ADAPTER

What is causing this error? I believe it is a configuration error, but I cannot discern what it is.
Setup:
I have two beans: a User entity bean, and a UserWrapper stateful session bean.
Execution:
My testing client-code looks up the UserWrapper EJB and creates a new object. In the UserWrapper ejbCreate method I am attempting to obtain a reference to a specific User by looking up the User EJB and calling its findByPrimaryKey method.
Everything works fine right up until the UserWrapper.ejbCreate method is ready to close; I catch this exception:
RemoteException occurred in server thread; nested exception is:
java.rmi.RemoteException: nested exception is: java.lang.RuntimeException:
Unable to create reference org.omg.CORBA.OBJ_ADAPTER: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1015 completed: No;
Observations:
User.ejbFindByPrimaryKey(UserPK pk) is NOT throwing ANY EXCEPTIONS! The error is passed to UserWrapper.ejbCreate from the container, or so it seems, but I am relatively positive it is not orginiating from the finder method. At this time the User.ejbFindByPrimaryKey method only returns the primary key object.
UserWrapper.ejbCreate code:
public void ejbCreate(String usrnm, String pswrd) throws CreateException {
// instance variables
UserHome userHome = null;
// implementation
try {
    // obtain an instance of the EJBHomeFactory and have it return an
    // instance of the UserHome interface
    userHome = (UserHome)EJBHomeFactory.getInstance().lookup(
        "ejb/User", net.cmpro.app.entity.user.UserHome.class);
    // request the container supply a User object for the specified
    // primary key object
    this.user = userHome.findByPrimaryKey(new UserPK(usrnm, pswrd));
catch(FinderException e) {
    throw new CreateException(e.toString());
catch(RemoteException e) {
    throw new EJBException(e.toString(), e);
}Need a little help here. I'm getting very frustrated because I've never had this problem before.
Thanks for any advice, no matter how off the wall it is.

Yes, it is. This returns an EJBHome object from a cache. I picked this up from the IBM website. It is very handy. The method in question is as follows:
public EJBHome lookup(String jndi, Class home) throws EJBException {
// instance variables
EJBHome ejbHome = null;
Object obj = null;
// implementation
try {
    // looks for the interface in the collection by class
    ejbHome = (EJBHome)interfaces.get(home);
    if(ejbHome == null) {
      // looks up the interface by its JNDI name
      obj = context.lookup(jndi);
      // casts the returned object into the interface desired
      ejbHome = (EJBHome)PortableRemoteObject.narrow(obj, home);
      // put the newly retreived interface into the collection and
      // list it by its class      never use the interfaces JNDI name
      // because a single EJB object could have multiple JNDI names
      interfaces.put(home, ejbHome);
catch(ClassCastException e) {
    throw new EJBException(e.toString());
catch(NamingException e) {
    throw new EJBException(e.toString(true), e);
return ejbHome;
}

HR Data Synchronization (Org Unit, Position and Employee) to SRM

Hi All Expert,
Currently, I had replicate the HR data (Org Unit, Position and Employee) to SRM thru transaction PFAL.
Each time there is a new position or new employee, I have to run PFAL and run manually by include the new position number or new employee into the program to replicate to SRM.
Does SAP have any specifiy program or step which I have follow to allow such automation? Is there any variant that I could set?
How to trigger the new Org units which are created in HR to replicate to SRM without any manual input into selection field of Object ID during running the PFAL?
We are trying to achieve automation of synchronization between changes/new creation in HR to replicate to SRM.
Thank for your help.
Paul

Hello Paul,
Below notes will surely help you..
1.The composite note for the process is 390380 - HR/ALE distribution in EBP/SRM.
2.The initial description of the process can be found in note 312090 - Integration HR -
EBP/SRM.
Thanks & Regards
Arshad

OM - Multiple Cost Centres link with Org Unit/Position not to employee

Hello gurus,
In OM there can only be one relationship at a time between an organizational unit and cost centre (A011). For those areas where there is a requirement for the position to have control over more than one cost centre, there are multiple options.
Option 1 - If only one of the cost centres is used for employee cost incurrence, this should be the main cost centre, and the others controlled through authorizations.
Option 2 - If more than one cost centre is used for employee cost incurrence, a subordinate organizational unit is created into which those positions are placed. In this scenario, the subordinate organizational units would not have a chief, and the reporting structure would go up to the more senior organizational units.
Option 3 - Use Cost centre distribution infotype 1018 (A014)
My question: is there a standard way through which we can show multiple cost centres attached to a position/org unit such that cost incurred by employees goes to master cost centre attached to org unit or positon and other cost centres are just attached to position/orgunit (just to show the org unit/position is managing these other cost centres as well).
Any thoughts? Anybody has used Enterprise Organization in CO to achieve this?
Regards,
Ahmad

To capture more than 1 cost center, you have to specify them in IT-1018 but employee's cost will be split based on this.
For data maintanance alone cost distribution is not possible (based on my knowledge).
May be equivalent custom infotype similar to 1018 @ Postiion / Org Unit level may work.
along with Master Cost center.

Reassignment to new Org.Unit & Position

Hello Everyone,
I have a requirement to reassign a Business Partner (Associated with Central Person) to a new org.unit & a new position in the organizational Model. This should be done using a FM. I would like to know if there are any FM's which can be used to reassign a BP from one Org.Unit to Different Org.Unit and a differént position.
I am able to create the relationship using FM *OM_CREATE_RELATION_WITH_DIALOG*. But relationship has to be reassigned to different org.unit & position. Let me know if any one you can help me with.
Best Regards,
Prabahar

Hi,
You can generate the required report from reporting tool HIS. select the org structure for which you want the report to be generated.
In the graphical view select the org unit and in the reporting window select organizational plan and select staff assignment as task function.

HR report/tranzaction on current and past org unit, position, job

Hi,
Does anyone know the code of the standard report / tranzaction to show the current and the past org unit, position and job for an employee?
Thank you
Adriana

Hi Adriana!
Please try using Headcount Changes report S_L9C_94000095.
Regards!
Woody.

Nakisa Org Chart Version 3.0 - Org Unit Position Statistics

Hi All,
Just a quick question, I am currently at a client site where org unit position statistics is always coming back with 0 for occupied and vacation positions.
There are clearly employees assigned to position in the org structure, but I am thinking it may be related to the work percentage on teh A008 relationship between the position and the person.
Can anyone confirm this or give some insight on why we could be getting zeros.
We are currently researching the authorizations to rule that out.
thanks.
JB

Hi Jamie,
I hope you are well. I assume you mean the OrgUnit Hierarchy > FTE View? For the OrgUnit FTE view, the data is calculated by counting all the Positions:
Occupied Positions: where Position has active Person assigned (defined by S A 008 P relationship and PA0000-STAT2 = 3 for related Person)
Vacant Positions: where Position has no active Person assigned (defined by S A 008 P relationship and PA0000-STAT2 = 3 for related Person)
However, this data element (Position_View_Element_Live.xml) uses the BAPI_SAP_NakisaRfcProcessor_PositionVacancyCount_Live class instead of a NakisaRFC Chart class but it does reference the SAPOrgUnitChart_Position NakisaRFC function. It might be that this class alter the output of the NakisaRFC Chart function.
Does that help?
Best regards,
Luke

Org Mgmt Report with Org Unit, Position, Person and Chef Position

Does anyone know a good report that shows an org structure with Org Unit, positions, person, and also highlights the chef positions?
I would like to link this to our portal, so would prefer a report to transaction PPOME.
Thanks,
Dianna

Hi,
You can generate the required report from reporting tool HIS. select the org structure for which you want the report to be generated.
In the graphical view select the org unit and in the reporting window select organizational plan and select staff assignment as task function.

Problem in Creating the Org Unit

Hi Experts,
I am only using the FM RH_INSERT_INFTY to create an Org unit with Infotypes 1000,1001 & 1028. We have recently upgraded our system to SRM 7.0 from 4.0.
Problem: The BP is not being created corresponding to the Org Unit.
But, When i created an Org Unit with above FMs in SRM 4.0, the BP number is created & is showing in PPOSA_BBP.
Please let me know if i need to run any other FM / do any modifications.
Thanks in Advance,
Vishnu Reddy

Hello Aswini,
I checked on a SRM 7 release and i get same behaviour as the one you described.
I did not find any OSS notes regarding this point.
I advise you to open an OSS message to have SAP clarification on this point.
Regards.
Laurent.

Naming convention of Org Units, Position

What is the naming convention used for Org Units, Positions, Jobs and other OM objects. Pls send document if any of you have.
Max points promised!

Namming conventions are made based on the company strategry. That means it varies from one organisation to another. I can find one convention which is availabe in net.
http://www.jhu.edu/hopkinsone/Secure_Private/Library/Blueprint/HumanResources_Sect9_18.pdf#search=%22sap%20hr%20Org%20Units%20Jobs%20Positions%20naming%20conventions%22
~thomas

Unable to create reference-org.omg.CORBA.OBJ_ADAPTER(Session- BMPEntityEJB)

Hi All
I am having following senerio with Sun One Application Server 7 on Win 2000.
UserRegistrationBean (Java Client) -> RegistrationBean (Session EJB) -> UserBean (Entity EJB)
The Java Client lookup and invokes Session EJB. It works fine.
Further, when the Session EJB calls the Entity EJB I get the following exception.
SEVERE: IOP5013: Unable to create reference: [org.omg.CORBA.OBJ_ADAPTER: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1015 completed: No]SEVERE: EJB5029: Exception getting ejb context : [UserBean]
SEVERE:
SEVERE: IOP5012: Some runtime exception ocurred in IIOP: [javax.ejb.EJBException: nested exception is: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to create reference org.omg.CORBA.OBJ_ADAPTER: vmcid: SUN minor code: 1015 completed: No]
Any idea what could be wrong?
Thanks for the help.
Regards
Satish

Make sure PrimaryKey class for entity has the equals
and hashcode methods implemented right.
You've to ensure that hashCode generated is
the same everytime for same primaryKey
and you do the right comparison for the
equals method.
HTH
-hima

Best Practice - Changing description for Org Unit/Position or creating new?

Hello Freinds,
I just want to know from your experience what's normally practiced in your implementations for OM :-
For scenarios where there is a need to change the description of a particular org unit or position, do u
1. just change the description effective a particular date (to maintain history) or
2. put an end date to those objects and create new ones ?
Solution 1 is quick and easy, but in IT0001 the description displayed is as on start date of that infotype which is normally a date prior to the change in desc of those objects. As a result this infotype keeps displaying old description.
Is there any way to change this display to show the current description instead of the description as on start date of this infotype ???
Solution 2 calls for a lot of related activities, say if i create a new org unit and delemit the old one - then i have to move all the sub org units and positions into this new one ... which is quite time consuming and doesn't really seem practical.
How do u manage such scenarios ?
Thanks
Allen

We use option #1, although I am not sure this is best practice. Using option 1 for positions makes it challenging when it comes to reporting on length of time in position. We frequently have the scenario where a person is reorged not because they applied for another position, but just because the big wigs want to move around the chess pieces. In these cases we simply modify the position attributes and then run a PA action. Then if you run a query and use the standard delivered Length of time in position field, it appears as if the person has been in the same position for years (which they have), but their position has been retitled, re-graded, and re-orged numerous times. This makes it very difficult to get to an employee's length of time in their role.
This is a great discussion question I hope more people respond with what they do and why.

Duplicate period appearing in German when creating new Org Unit in PPOME

Hi Guys,
My users are encountering a problem when they create an Org. Unit/Position in PPOME.
Whenever a new Org. Unit is being created (lets assume with the validity date of 01.11.2006), an earlier period would automatically be created, thus making the object having 2 periods.
Upon clicking on the "Select Period" icon for the object in the Detail area of the screen, 2 lines of periods are being displayed.
When i view the second period, i would see the correct details of the Org. Unit that was keyed in by the user.
However, when i view the first period, the details are all on German language (this record was not created by the user at all).
Therefore, i checked the tables T528B and T528T, i found duplicate records for certain Object IDs. It seems the Org Unit that was created by the user is being appended after the Org Unit that is in German.
Any ideas on how to clean up those lines of data that is appearing in German and prevent such an occurance from happening in future?
Thanks in advance

Hi Duxton,
Thanks for the reply.
I followed your instructions but i am unable to detect anything out of the ordinary.
I'm compared the configuration in Development again Production and they are the same.
However, the problem i described in this thread is not appearing in Development. It is just happening in Production.
Any other ideas?
It's not really affecting my client's business process but i would like to know what is causing it out of curiousity

Transport org. unit & position to another system

Hi,
I modified some org. units and positions in development and system did not ask for a transport request. How can I move my objects into test system ??

Jorge hi;
With tcode RE_RHMOVE30 you can create a request and transport them.
All you have to do is to choose the plan version, object types, objects. If you want all relations to be transported you can write A* in field evaluation path but if you want you can transport specific relations.
Select transport objects box.
In field task you can press f4 and then you can create a new request for the transport. After this press F8.
There will be a new screen. In this screen select the objects to be transported and then press F8.
After that you will release the request and transport it to the other system via using se09 and stms.
Regards;
Okan
Edited by: Okan Caliskan on Oct 4, 2011 1:58 PM

Unable to create masterdata ( org Units, Position )etc.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for