Unable to create rule Error:Function Module does not meet the workflow conv

Hi Workflow experts,
Could any one help me with rule creation. Below is my Function Module Interface.
""Local Interface:
*" TABLES
*"      AC_CONTAINER STRUCTURE SWCONT OPTIONAL
*"      ACTOR_TAB STRUCTURE SWHACTOR OPTIONAL
*" EXCEPTIONS
*"      NOBODY_FOUND
The function module test is successful with all required conventions for workflow but while i try to create a rule with the funtion module i get the error "Function Module does not meet the workflow conventions"
I Also have included the following in FM
INCLUDE <cntn01>.
Any suggestions would be helpful. Thanks in Advance,
Imran

Hi,
I am not sure whether the rule accepts the optional flag. Remove the optional flag for the tables parameters and try again. According to the documentation you have implemented the right interface. It might be the issue with the tables parameter being optional.
Hope this helps,
Sudhi

Similar Messages

AD CS Web Enrollment Error - "public key does not meet the minimum size required"

I've installed a standalone root CA and a enterprise subordinate CA in our environment - both are Windows 2008 R2. Everything is working except for Web Enrollment using a custom User template. I duplicated the default User template and choose
2003 Compatible for the new one. I changed the minimum key length to 2048 and set the validity period to 2 years.
We'd like to avoid using the Advanced Certificate Request page, so I modified certrqtp.inc to point to the new template:
Else
' Request types for enterprise
rgAvailReqTypes(0,FIELD_TEMPLATE)="User-custom"
rgAvailReqTypes(0,FIELD_FRIENDLYNAME)=L_UserTemplateCert_Text
rgAvailReqTypes(0,FIELD_CSPLIST)="Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider v1.0?Microsoft Base Cryptographic Provider v1.0"
rgAvailReqTypes(0,FIELD_CSPLIST2)="Microsoft Base Cryptographic Provider v1.0?Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider v1.0"
rgAvailReqTypes(0,FIELD_EXPORTABLE)="True"
nAvailReqTypes=1
End If
I also ran into this issue where Web Enrollment jumps straight to the Advanced page if the original User template isn't present on the CA:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/winserversecurity/thread/9ab514bc-1f9f-424e-b70d-705874d9c623
So I have both User templates loaded on the CA, and I get this error back when attempting a certificate request using IE 8 or 9:
Your certificate request was denied.
Your Request Id is 25. The disposition message is "Denied by Policy Module".
Contact your administrator for further information.
Looking at the CA's Failed Requests section, I see this error:
The public key does not meet the minimum size required by the specified certificate template. 0x80094811 (-2146875375)
I double-checked our custom template and it does specify 2048 as the minimum key size.
Also, when trying with Chrome 11.0, I get an extra option during enrollment asking for a key size (1024 or 2048). When I choose 2048, the certificate request succeeds. I don't get the key size option when using IE, though.
We'd like to get this working with IE if possible. Any ideas?

We had the same error message. The problem turned out to be on the requesting computer, not the server. When we went to renew a cert in IIS on a server it was generating a 1028-bit key request. Since the minimum on the server was set to 2048-bit
the request failed. So, there's two ways to handle this. You can change the certificate template on the server to have a minimum set to 1024-bit or you can have IIS submit a new request for a certificate and choose 2048-bit as the size of the key during the
wizard. We opted to have IIS request a 2048-bit key. The same would apply for whatever computer, device, or software you are using to form the certificate request.
Your message is pretty old, but I am running on the same problem right now. I've added a custom template to select (with 2048) minimum length, but the webpage from the IIS by default provides just 1024-bit. Where can i optimize the IIS to use a 2048-bit
key when requesting the certificate?
When I open the same site with Firefox for example, i got a listed option (Medium / High Strength) to choose for the encryption. It seems that the high strength is >= 2048-bit.

Function module does not update the storage location in delivery

Hello,
I've been trying to use SD_DELIVERY_UPDATE_PICKING to update the storage location in SD return deliveries, without any success. Any clues? The FM works fine when it comes to updating the picking quantity, but the storage location issue still persists.
Thanks in advance,
Joao

Hi Joao,
I have the same problem. I tried to find the FM SD_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE but couldn't find it. Have you by any change specified the incorrect FM name here? If yes, can you please communicate the correct FM name?
Regards,
Divyaman

Error in ERM: Function module does not exist

Hi all,
Lately, we are experiencing a frequent error in ERM (5.3 SP 15.0) that we had not had before. We are unsure what caused the error. The message displayed to the user is "Unhandled error". The log error message is "Message Code is 651 Messsage Details Function module does not exist Message Type is E" (see full logs below).
The error occurs for example, when users are trying to generate derived roles after saving the org values for the derived role during the methodology process, or when administrators are trying to update the impacted derived roles after for org value mappings.
Has anyone experienced this or someting similar before? Any ideas what could be the reason here?
Thanks!
Patrick
Edited by: Patrick Weyers on Sep 15, 2011 9:36 AM

Log extract:
2011-09-15 09:05:15,103 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_18] ERROR Message Code is 651 Messsage Details Function module does not exist Message Type is E
java.lang.Throwable: Message Code is 651 Messsage Details Function module does not exist Message Type is E
     at com.virsa.re.service.sap.dao.ManageAuthDataDAO.getAuthorizationData(ManageAuthDataDAO.java:1064)
     at com.virsa.re.bo.impl.AuthorizationDataBO.getNewTransactionObjects(AuthorizationDataBO.java:821)
     at com.virsa.re.role.actions.AuthAuthorizationDataAction.addObjsForNewTxns(AuthAuthorizationDataAction.java:3527)
     at com.virsa.re.role.actions.AuthAuthorizationDataAction.reloadTransactions(AuthAuthorizationDataAction.java:4128)
     at com.virsa.re.role.actions.AuthAuthorizationDataAction.execute(AuthAuthorizationDataAction.java:157)
     at com.virsa.framework.NavigationEngine.execute(NavigationEngine.java:273)
     at com.virsa.framework.servlet.VFrameworkServlet.service(VFrameworkServlet.java:230)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.doWork(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:321)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:377)
     at com.virsa.framework.servlet.VFrameworkServlet.service(VFrameworkServlet.java:286)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.FilterChainImpl.runServlet(FilterChainImpl.java:117)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:62)
     at com.virsa.comp.history.filter.HistoryFilter.doFilter(HistoryFilter.java:43)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:58)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:384)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:266)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:386)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:364)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:1039)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:265)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:95)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:175)
     at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
     at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:219)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:104)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:176)
2011-09-15 09:05:15,105 [SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_18] ERROR com.virsa.re.role.actions.AuthAuthorizationDataAction
java.lang.Throwable: java.lang.NullPointerException
     at com.virsa.re.service.sap.dao.ManageAuthDataDAO.getAuthorizationData(ManageAuthDataDAO.java:1084)
     at com.virsa.re.bo.impl.AuthorizationDataBO.getNewTransactionObjects(AuthorizationDataBO.java:821)
     at com.virsa.re.role.actions.AuthAuthorizationDataAction.addObjsForNewTxns(AuthAuthorizationDataAction.java:3527)
     at com.virsa.re.role.actions.AuthAuthorizationDataAction.reloadTransactions(AuthAuthorizationDataAction.java:4128)
     at com.virsa.re.role.actions.AuthAuthorizationDataAction.execute(AuthAuthorizationDataAction.java:157)
     at com.virsa.framework.NavigationEngine.execute(NavigationEngine.java:273)
     at com.virsa.framework.servlet.VFrameworkServlet.service(VFrameworkServlet.java:230)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.doWork(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:321)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:377)
     at com.virsa.framework.servlet.VFrameworkServlet.service(VFrameworkServlet.java:286)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.FilterChainImpl.runServlet(FilterChainImpl.java:117)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:62)
     at com.virsa.comp.history.filter.HistoryFilter.doFilter(HistoryFilter.java:43)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.runtime.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:58)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:384)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:266)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:386)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:364)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:1039)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:265)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:95)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:175)
     at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
     at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:219)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:104)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:176)

XI datasources function modules does not exist after BW upgrade to 7.3

We have recently upgraded our dev BI system to 7.3
During our testing phase we found that we are unable to load data coming from XI system.
When we checked the functional modules of the XI(web services)
datasources we found that the function modules does not exist in the system.
Eg : For our GECARS datasource we have 2 funcitonal modules
1. /BIO/QI6AZXH_ZIFIGECARS
2. /BIO/QI6AZXH_ZIFIGECARS_RFC (delta function module)
we have activated resp datasource and found that code for
/BIO/QI6AZXH_ZIFIGECARS exist now but we are facing issues with RFC
funciton modules (/BIO/QI6AZXH_ZIFIGECARS_RFC )
To put it in simple terms we are facing issues with Dev BI since upgradeto 7.3 with respect to RFC and non-availability of function modules.
Kindly help us in resolving this.
Thanks,
Kiran

Hello Kiran,
Have you found the reason for the non existence of the FM in the system after the upgrade?
Have you found any alternative? I hope you would have created an OSS message, if so whats the response have you got?
Kindly let me know as I am experiencing similar issue where one of the FM (RSDRC_MULTIPROV_GET_MAPPING) does not exist in BI system after the upgrade.
Regards,
Vinoth V

Function module does not exist in ECC 6.0

Hi All,
These two below function module does not exist in ECC 6.0 but exist in 4.6.Could you please let me know replacement of these two's.
FI_DOCUMENT_ARCH_READ_SINGLE
CHECK_IBAN_ACTIVE
Thanks
Mohit

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.Could you please give me example that how to use it.
Thanks
Mohit

Error "Function G1 does not exist "

Hi ,
While doing monitoring got error " Function G1 does not exist ".
Bdoc type : BUPA_REL
Sate : E04.
Checked SMQ1,SMQ2 , no queues were in sysfail status.How to maintain this function.
Help me how to clear .
Thanks in advance, Regards,
PA.

Hi ,
May be your customization settings was not replicated correctly.
In R/3 you have Contact person function G1 and it doesn't exist in CRM.
You can check it : go to BP trn => open an organisation that has contact person =>relationship tab => double click on contact person => In "Contact person data "frame you will see field "function" => press F4 and check existing values.
Those values should be same as in R/3 system.If not - check your customization objects synchronization.
Hope, it's help
Rika

Error 'Function module "IAOM_ACCOUNT_MANAGER" not found' in RPM_FIN02.

Hi,
When I am trying to run report RPM_FIN02 in ERP system, I am getting error ''Function module "IAOM_ACCOUNT_MANAGER" not found'.
Please note i have done required configration in both systems i.e. cProject and ERP.
Can somebody help me on this?
Regards,
Manoj

Thanks for your input.
This note is already implemented in our system.
Anyway my problem is solved.The problem was in our configration.
Regards,
Manoj

Fail to create a VD Collection with error "The Virtual desktop template does not meet the provisioning requirements."

I get the following error when I try to create a Virtual desktop
collection;
"The Virtual desktop template does not meet the provisioning requirements."
although I'm specifing a sysprep'd VM installed WS2012 for a virtual desktop template.
Is there any way to resolve?
Or, is there any couses of this message?
thanks.

I realize this is an old thread. I'll post and see if I get a response. If not, I'll create a new thread. My question is how does Microsoft suggest SPLA partners create VDI pools since they cannot license Windows 7 or 8 via SPLA? Why
would you restrict the provisioning to only the desktop operating systems that you won't allow partners to license for deployment?
Are there any plans to change this to include 2008 R2 or WS2012 as the base OS for a VD template?
Rob

The list of extensions for InDesign now have a yellow triangle warning symbol in front of a good many of the extensions and when moused over i get one of two messages: "Extensions may not function properly because it does not meet the dependency conditio

The list of extensions for InDesign now have a yellow triangle warning symbol in front of a good many of the extensions and when moused over i get one of two messages:
"Extensions may not function properly because it does not meet the dependency condition."
OR
Extension Status is not consistent with extension set configuration."
The reason I opened the Extension Manager in the first place was to check to see if I had installed a third party extension. And I was presented with these warning symbols. I haven't added anything, I haven't done anything that would cause this.
Does anyone know how to fix this???
I am running OSX 10.9.5; Indesign CS6 version 8.0.2 And Adobe Extension Manager version 6.0.8.28.
Thanks in advance!
Nina

Many InDesign pre-installed extensions (Those extensions you have immediately after InDesign installation) define dependency rules in their mxi files. Dependency means that one extension works well only if one or more other extensions are installed and enabled. If this condition is not met, the yellow triangle warning will be shown.
You can select an extension with warning, click "Advanced" tag page in the lower right panel. You will see "This extension has dependency on: <extension name> ...". Check whether every extensions listed here are available and enabled. If not, enable them. Repeat these steps for all the extensions which have warning.

I receive the error "axError.gifSorry, your device does not meet the system requirements that are needed to support BlackBerry App World

Hi My name is Tibor Madarasi i purchased a Blackberry 8900 brand new i can't install app world i instaled the updates for this phone (v4.2.0.85)still can install app world i receive the error "axError.gif Sorry, your device does not meet the system requirements that are needed to support BlackBerry App World." I'm using O2 network in London UK Please advice me Regards
Message Edited by MichelleK on 06-15-2009 09:53 AM

ffbizz wrote:
I hate this bold 9700 series 2 no carrier and find it to be a pathetic product backed up by even more pathetic support so I have decided to use it as a torch. There is an app for this but it requires app world first. Are you trying to say that I MUST have a carrier and they will resolve this issue but otherwise RIM cannot do anything about their own product?
Hello and Welcome to the Forums!
We are so sorry that you are having so many difficulties. While many experience the same (a search here will reveal that fact), there are also many who have very positive experiences with their BB. Not every device is suitable for everyone -- which IMHO is why there are so many choices.
In addition, but for AppWorld, front line support for BB's is, by contract, not provided by RIM. The carriers and authorized resellers are responsible for front line formal support to end users. It is possible to bypass your carrier and seek assistance direct from RIM, but such involves fees since you are bypassing your support agreement with your carrier. The "Support and Services" tab toward the top of these forum pages provide information about that. But, if you do go through your carrier for support, they can escalate into RIM at no fee to you if they so choose to.
As to AppWorld Support (beyond what we volunteer to provide in these forums), that is available via this portal:
https://www.blackberry.com/CSOHelp/index.do?ft=generic
If you choose to submit to them in this manner, then please use, in the "Please select a component:" field, the AppWorld Billing/Payment selection. Any other selection will simply route you back anonymously to these public forums.
As to your question, RIM and the carriers both participate in AppWorld. My suspicion is that the carriers get a portion of the costs for the apps that are vended via AppWorld -- but that's just my suspicion. Hence, the use of AppWorld indeed requires a carrier (and, indeed, the proper data plan level from them).
But, AppWorld is merely a portal, vending apps that are (for the most part) developed by others. As such, it is not the only portal in the world for BB apps. There are a few, I think, apps that are exclusively vended via AppWorld...but I think that number is rather small. Consequently, if you desire an app that will allow your BB to function as you desire, you should seek out alternative vending portals. There are plenty.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

I'm trying to download the trial version of Adobe Illustrator. An error message says that the OS does not meet the minimum system requirements for the installer. 10.6.0 is the minimum required for installation. How do I get my mac to be a 10.6.0 ?

I'm trying to download the trial version of Adobe Illustrator. An error message says that the OS does not meet the minimum system requirements for the installer. 10.6.0 is the minimum required for installation. How do I get my mac to be a 10.6.0 ? Right now I have a 10.5.8 is there a way to upgrade or something?

Buy the Snow Leopard retail installer (http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC573Z/A?fnode=MTY1NDAzOA).
That will take you to 10.6.3.
If required you can then use the combo updater to get to the latest version, 10.6.8 (http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1399)
SL system reqmts;

ECM Employee Does Not Meet the Requirements Error

We're receiving an error on the ECM compensation planning iView for certain eligible employees. It says, 'employee does not meet the requirements to proceed with this action' error. Have you seen this error before? If yes, then what fixed it? These employees are eligible on IT758 records.

I can think of this:
Scenario 1
Configuration setting in V_T71ADM08: Anytime review is checked for your review.
System response: Dates in V_T71ADM10 are not checked and you are able to process the review.
Scenario 2
Configuration setting in V_T71ADM08:
Anytime review is not checked for your review.
Selection period 01/01/2010 - 04/15/2010
Review period 12/31/2009 - 12/31/2009
Configuration setting in V_T71ADM10:
Effective Date 3/31/2010 (fixed)
System response: Error as the effective date is March 31st 2010. The review will only be effective for that day. Anytime review does not check this date as explained in the 1st scenario. I think you need to remove the fixed effective date and use the effective date begin and end date as 01/01/2010 u2013 04/15/2010. You would then also uncheck the anytime review setting in V_T71ADM08. I think the review period in the same table should also match the effective dates.
Hope this helps.
Donnie

Error: The installed graphics card does not meet the minimum system requirements by Aperture

I have a Mac Pro 3.1 10.5.8 and Aperture 2.1.4. My NVida 8800gt with 512 mb was over heating so I brought and install the ATI radeon hd 5770 to replace it. Now when I try to start Aperture I get this message "Error: The installed graphics card does not meet the minimum system requirements by Aperture". All other software works fine, ie photoshop elements and Safari. When I install my old card aperture will open with no problem, but of course the card will overheat within 10 mins and I will have no video. I have search on google with no luck. Will upgrading to Aperture 3 fix this problem?

5770 requires 10.6.5.
The 8800GT - there is the 350* bake in over 10 minutes - 50% or better chance
you can find 8800GT on http://myworld.ebay.com/macvidcards/
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/23049/smcfancontrol
http://www.bresink.com/osx/HardwareMonitor.html
Fan control helps with FBDIMMs which need to be kept under 70C too.

Imovie: I have just downloaded 'mavericks' and have installed all updates. I get an error message:Your computer's video card does not meet the minimum system requirements.

imovie: I have just downloaded 'mavericks' and have installed all updates. I get an error message:Your computer’s video card does not meet the minimum system requirements. What to do? Thanks for any help in advance.

I am not 100% sure this is the issue, but I saw a different thread about the ATI Radeon HD 2600 not being OpenCL compatible for another program and that a newer compatible graphics card would be required to solve the problem. I am getting the same message with my 2007 iMac 24".

Unable to create rule Error:Function Module does not meet the workflow conv

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for