Unable to derive funds center in F-90 Asset purchase from vendor

Dear All,
I have maintained the fund center value in the asset master and also maintained the derviation rule in FMDERIVER for a combination of Cost Center > Funds Center.
When i try to post asset purchase using F-90 t-code, it is asking me for funds center in the asset line item. The system is not deriving the value from asset master or derivation rule maintained. I am unable to maintain the funds center in the posting as the field is grayed out.
Request you to kindly provide your valuable suggestion.
Best regards
Abishay

Hello,
The fund center has to be activated for Account Assignment Type 01 (APC Value Posting)
Maybe note 437076 could help to check the settings in the following IMG activity :
   Activate the account assignment elements for each transaction and
   account assignment type:
   Asset Accounting -> Integration with the General Ledger ->
   Additional Account Assignment Objects -> Define Account
   Assignment Types for Account Assignment Objects
I hope it helps,
Hélène

Similar Messages

How a PR/PO will be link to fund center in case of plant purchase

hello all
How we can linkt the purchase order or purchase requisition with the fund center in case of plant purchases i.e there is no account assignment in the PR/PO.
Thanks
alok gupta

Hi,
Please, read basic FM material about the integration:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/f0/ca3e8d260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards,
Eli:

Derivation of Funds Center from cost center for Asset PR/PO in FM

Hello Experts,
We configured new FM area and relevant BCS settings. It is working fine except PR or PO for Account assignment category A.
Issue: system is not able derive funds center from cost center in the asset master. cost center is not updated in EBKN table for Asset PR.
we have maintained the following;
1. Funds center is activated in Asset account assignments
2. Maintained derivation rule with function module: FMDT_READ_MD_ASSET
3. Derivation rule for cost center to funds center also maintained
If maintain funds center manually in PR it is working fine and consuming budget also.
Requirement: How derive funds center from cost center assigned in asset. I have verified all tickets raised in this forum, but nothing has answered my question.
Request you to provide solution for above issue.
Thanks in advance for support.
Regards,
Chalapathi

Hi Venkata,
You have two derivation rules, first related to Asset function module and second one is related to CC and FC combination.
You need to maintain the function module derivation rule first then you need to maintain the derivation rule related to combination of CC and FC. Because first you need to derive CC from asset master and then you need to derive fund center with reference to this CC.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

Derivation of fund center based on purchasing group

Hi,
It is required to determine the fund center based on purchasing group (during PR creation). I have gone through one thread which suggests inclusion of the field EKGRP into FMDERIVE, then to COBL.
However I was trying to check whether it can be done through table lookup using field USERTEMP1 and assigning the same to EKGRP. But in the table lookup screen, the upper part contains the fields BANFN (Purchase Requisition Number) and BNFPO (Item Number of Purchase Requisition) which need to be assigned to source fields. I am not sure what source fields should be assigned and how it will work.
Request your input in this regard.
Thanks in advance!
Snigdho.

Hi,
I am trying to derive fund center based on purchasing group using field USERTEMP1. In the upper part of table lookup screen (I am using table EBAN) what should I assign to the fields BANFN and BNFPO?
Thanks
Snigdho

Fund center derivation based on functional location cost center

Hi,
can anybody share the process to derive fund center based on cost center assigned to functional location/equipment of a plant maintenance order
Thanks

Hi Eli,
Thanks for your response.
Scenario is as follows:
Cost is booked to PM order & settles to cost centers. I don't have budget at PM order level. But will have budget in fund management for cost center. So whenever I book cost to PM order it should check budget available in fund center. Fund center should be derived from cost center assigned to functional location of PM Order
I have not used function module before for derivation. I have created a derivation rule based on functional module but there is no place to assign fund center in derivation rule. Please explain the process to derived fund center through PM order in above scenario.
Thanks

Controlled budget execution only fund center

Dear gurus,
I have the following situation, the budget prepared by the fund center and COMMIT ITEM, but the execution needs to be controlled only in the fund center, Regardless of the commit item
Any help is welcome
Thanks

Hi,
The need and the following:
    Budget made the Fund Center: 1XAD345
                                Commit Item: 3456 - 2000 Materials
                                Commit Item: 4564 - 2000 Consumption
                     Total Fund Center: 4000
When making a purchase requisition, request or posting in FI will
as follows:
Fund Center: 1XAD345
Commit Item: 3456 - Materials - 2500, or I blew the
Commit Item: but respecting the ceiling of the Fund Center.
After a request to consult the reports of FM would be as follows:
Fund Center = Balance:
         4000 - 2500 = 1,500 available for new spending
Thanks

Funds Mangement - Fund center derivation error at the time of PO/MIGO

Hello -
Generally ,If FM account assignements are available in purchase requisition , same should be carried to purchase order and to the good receipts. But I am getting an error at the time of PO or MIGO that " Fund center not derived'. Why this happening ? What can I do to avoid this problem. can I create a step in the derivation to keep the original FM assignments from the previous documents....is there something to do with field status??
Thanks in Advance
Chris

Hi
Please read carefully tye warehouse concept
Excample warehouse concept II
>At PR no FM update
>At PO no FM update
>AT GR no FM update
>AT consumption on Cost center, WBS or Internal order FM is updated and AVC is checked
Read the release note of ERP 6 or ERP5 the customising of Warehouse concept is well explained
In sumary:
Create a stock commitment item statistically
Create a warehouse funds center
Create a funds
Create a derivation rule for warehouse concept 2
Create a derivation rule where you have plant, valuation class and warehouse funds center
Cretae a derivation rule fund>warehouse funds center>stock commitment item
Go in customising integration to make field status for assignement FM account asignments
Select PO and PR and make optional the funds, funds cenbter, commitment item
And when you will create a PR or PO FM data will come automatically
ciao
Salvator
PSM-FM Consultant
BXL

Unable to do the restriction at Fund Center or FM Area when FM is not activ

Hi,
we have the following business requirement:
Background of the issue:
Field Status variant in Account Assignment category and GL:
We are in the process of rolling out one of our company codes which is
in a different instance(server).
We already have some 130+ company codes running in a different
instance. This is a kind of Instance consolidation to bring all systems
under one instance.
Funds Management has been activated in the company code for which we
are carrying out the rollout. FM has not been activated for the
existing company codes.
Now, the issue is with regard to the field status variants, which can
be controlled at the company code level and which cannot be controlled
which is at the client level.
(i)     The existing company codes have a field status variant which
has the field status groups having the fields Commitment items and
Funds center in Suppress mode in the existing instance.
(ii)     The company to be rolled out has the field status variant which
has field status groups having the fields Commitment items and Funds
Center in Optional mode.
(iii)     On the other hand, there is yet another field status control
for the Account assignment objects like Cost center, WBS elements, etc.
in the MM-FI integration area. This is at client level and at present
the same has the status of u201CSuppressu201D for Commitment items and Funds
Center. We have changed the same to u201COptionalu201D for the purpose of
testing the proposed roll out in our existing instance.
In that case, the status of GL account assignment in above is
clashing with our client level field status as described in (iii)
above. As a result, we are forced to change the field status in
above to optional mode for our existing company codes which we do not
intend to do.
When only one company within a group of companies is activated with FM,
I feel that:
(i)     At the client level, there is no option for me other than to
keep the Funds center and commitment items in optional mode
(ii)     At the GL level, I should be able to keep my field status in
Suppress mode (If FM is not activated) and in Optional mode (If FM is
activated) and SAP should be able to take care of the clash in the
field status at the transaction level in such a scenario.
The issue is we are able to control the access if FM is activated for a particular company code, where as we are unable to control the access for other company codes where FM is not activated and FM Area is not linked.
We tried to use the BADI ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST, but this is applicable for POs only.
Please look into this issue and help us in meeting our business requirement.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramakrishna

Hi Justin,
Thanks for the extra points.
Copy and save this bold text some where
/Applications/iChat.app/Contents/MacOS/iChat -errorLogLevel 7
This needs to be run in Terminal.
iChat needs to be shut down to do so.
Just paste it in Terminal after the Welcome to Darwin message and hit enter.
It will launch iChat and create an on-going log in the Terminal window.
You will see the reference to the Harware rules.plist
Further down you will see the bandwidth found by iChat, followed by the number of Audio and Video Buddies that you can support.
It goes on.....
It makes a note of the router that you are connected to.
After that it will end up lists listening checks until you connect to a Chat.
This makes this a useful way to find out what iChat can see at it's startup.
To Stop - Quit iChat in the Normal way.
Save the Log in a Text editor of some sort. (Post here if required).
Then Quit Terminal.
It is a useful tool to highlight some things in the start up phase, (And a reminder to look in specific places) when you think you have looked at all the settings.
8:12 PM Wednesday; November 15, 2006

How to derive commitment item and fund center when create PR from MRP.

Dear Experts,
No commitment item and fund center are derived when I create PR from MRP. I have to run transaction fm_mrp_pr to derive commitment item and fund center. However, I want to derive FM assignments during creating PR through transaction MD04. I plan to use user-exit to derive FM assignment while PR is creating from MRP. Which FM bapi, functions,etc... can I use in user-exit to derive FM assignment? Do you have an idea?
Thank you in advance,
Sibel

Hi Sibel,
Please check if note 1247722 and 1127135 are applied in your system. If not, kindly apply it and retest your issue. It should resolve it.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa.

How to derive Cost center from Funds Center

Hi,
i post a GR (Return item) and i have a difference of price, i want to assign this difference (assined to a Gl Account) to a Cost center please how to do that ? i have a Funds Center entered in this GR, can i derive the cost center from this Funds Center ?
Please Help.
Regards.

Hi,
There is no 'derivation' funcitionality as such available. Thoough, you can build a CO substitution via OKC9 and, based on your fund centre, set the cost centre value.
Regards,
Eli

Unable to post FR50 (Original Budget) for New Fund Center

Dear All,
We are in ECC6.0 and using Former Budgeting, Our business team created a new fund center and assigned it to cost center in the derivation rule.
Before they granted original budget using FR50, the business users started posting various invoices, expenses, POs, PRs against the cost center accordingly the Available Budget became Negative.
Now they are trying to post Original Budget for the new fundcenter using FR50, however system gives an error saying Payment Budget exceeded.
Please advice how to grant budget in such situations, we had an alternative to reverse all commitments and actuals posted against the fundcenter and grant budget, this worked in our test environment. However in Production we will not be able to do this due to too much volume already posted.
Is there a way to fix this, note that Availability control is active and not sure why system allowed to post without budget.
Any pointers, is this how standard SAP behaves or are we missing something.
We have also checked on master data elements of commitment item/fundcenter.. everythign looks fine.
request your inputs.
regards
Diwakar

Hi,
I believe you are using Former Budgeting. Please check below if this is not the cause for your issue:
Please check the following customizing that you have done in your system:
SPRO -> Public Sector Management -> Funds Management Government -> Former Budgeting -> Availability Control -> Define Parameters for Availability Control
See if you have set the flag: Check on lowest budget object with budget in your customizing.
Please check the documentation about this flag, specially this part:
"If you do not set the indicator, availability control runs against the first budget object, even if it has received NO BUDGET. This is the setting in the system as delivered."
You can check also report BPINDAN2_NEW.
This means that the budget is going to be checked in the first object with budget in your budget hierarchy.
If this is your case, you have only two options:
1.- Remove the negative budget you have in the combination of funds center/commitment item.
2.- Add the Combination funds center/commitment item to the exemption list of AVC.
I will prefer that you do the first option, as for me sounds strange to have negative budget, but this is one decision that you need to discuss it internally in your company.
If you choose any of the 2 options above, please do not forget to reconstruct your budget and assigned values AFTER you have done one of the options above, with the following transactions (in this order):
1.- Run transaction FMBV in order to reconstruct Budget values.
2.- Run report RFFMRC04 in Test mode in order to check if there is still some inconsistency.
3.- If RFFMRC04 shows inconsistencies, then run this report in Update Mode.
4.- Reconstruct distributed values with transaction FM9P
5.- Reconstruct Total values with transaction FM9Q
6.- Reconstruct assigned values with FMBV again.
I hope this helps.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

FM Derivation form cost center to fund center

Hi,
I have defined in FM DERIVE cost center = fund center. In pm order cost center is derived from the work center. But the fund center is not coming there, which is defined in FMDERIVE for this cost center .
Please help to resolve the issue.
Thanks

Hi,
Check whether FM- CO INTEGRATION IS ACTIVE,

No fund center derive

Dear sapient
I am getting an error while doing PR. "no fund center derive". I created one derivation rule
MATERIAL NUMBER=COMMITMENT ITEM-FUND CENTER
User is entering 4 line item with different material code, but in line item 3 system is deriving correct fund center and commitment item. in other line system is deriving only commitment item not the fund center.
systme showing error NO FUND CENTER DERIVE FOR LINE ITEM 10,20,40.
Please suggest me.
thnx and regards
Soraj

HI Eli
Thanx for reply. I activated the trace but only commitment item is deriving .
Sory to say that user have given wrong inform that in one line item FUND CENTER & COMMITMENT ITEM is flowing.
but actuly fund center is not coming in all 10,20,30,40 line items.
Please let me know the reason. if i did any mistake. or shall i create two different rule like
MATERIAL NUMBER= COMMITMENT ITEM
MATERIAL NUMBER=FUND CENTER
Thanx and regards
Soraj

Error : No funds center entered/derived in item 00002

Hi,
While posting FI documents in F-02, happen to face below error ,
"No funds center entered/derived in item 00002 (XXXX/XX4001/)"
Message no. FI313.
We have configured Funds management and while testing, we are facing this error.
How to solve this problem?????....
Is there any configuration pending.
The account is a reconciliation account(vendor A/c) should we assign Funds center even for balance sheet A/c?.
Thanks,
Chandru

have u used assignment or derivation rule for cost center fund center assignment?

No funds center derived for GR IR account

Dear all,
We have faced a strange issue in Funds Management. We have a GR IR GL account for which system automatically derives the commitment item and fund center based on those in the PO. That is, whatever FC and CI are maintained in the PO, the GR IR account derives the same accounts during MIRO.
However this is true only for material POs. We have created a service PO for a specific network of a project. In this particular case the system is not allowing us to post the invoice as it cannot derive the fund center. It seems during MIRO, the FM accounts of PO are not getting linked to the GR IR account. Please note that GR (or service entry sheet entry) is not relevant for budget consumption. Budget consumption takes place during PR,PO and MIRO.
Request your input in this regard.
Thanks
Snigdho

Hi,
First of all, you need to be sure that all existent correction notes are implemented in your system.
Please check if the following notes are applied in your system (including manual steps):
1289547 FM account assignment incorrect in GR/IR clearing in service
1327560 GR Account Assignments based on previoustly posted SES
1429223 GR Account Assignments based on previoustly posted SES II
1450965 FM account assignment incorrectly inherited from PO
1480503 FM account assignment for GL line overwritten in MIRO
1502874 Planned Delivery Costs are not updated during GR/IR postings
These notes correct wrong behaviours in include LFMCOBLF06 related to account assignment.
If the notes are not there but are valid to your current release/package, please apply all in one test system and retest your issue.
Regarding inheriting the FM assignments, material po's can retrieve the FM account assignments from the FM tables.
This ensures that the current FM account assigments are always used.
However, in the case of Services, it is not possible to use the FM tables as it is not guaranteed that the correct Account assigment will be retrieved. So, the SES table ESKN is used instead. The ESKN record is created at the time the SES is created.
In Summary: Due to the structure of Service documents, the FM tables cannot be used to access the previous document's account assignment. Material documents can use the FM tables to get the previous account assignemnt. So, for Material documents, FMDERIVE does not need to be called when a predecessor document is found. However, FMDERIVE needs to be called for SES because the SES application table does not store FM fields. So, this needs to be rederived.
I suggest you also to read SAP Note 923672 (do not apply it).
The account assignments on the SES screen are indeed changable. This is part of the standard design for SES process. Unfortunately, FM cannot control if the fields on the account assignment popup screen should be in edit, display, or hidden mode. This screen is control by SES, therefore is good that you check also this customizing in MM:
IMG - Materials Management - Purchasing - Account Assignment - Maintain Account Assignment Categories
In this activity, for the account assignment category which is the account assignment category used in the P.O., you have flag 'Acct. Assg. Changeable', then, the account assignment should be derived again. Not sure if you can restrict by different processes and for SES have this flag not marked so FMDERIVE will be not called and the FM account assignments would be inherit from the PO.
From my understanding, if the PO concern is a service PO, it is legitimate to accept the service (via ML81N) with different account assignments. Hence, the account assignment fields are not hidden or in display mode only.
From FM point of view, if a user does not deliberately change the account assignments on the SES screen or FMDERIVE is not setup to overwrite the FM account assignments, then by default the FM account assignments are inherited from the PO.
I hope this helps to overcome your issue.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Unable to derive funds center in F-90 Asset purchase from vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for