Unable to go ahead with an approved change request.

Hi experts,
            Iam facing an issue in Solman Configuration in Charms Scenario.We have created 2 users: Requester & Change Manager.We are able to successfully create the  change request. It is also successfully approved by the change manager(status authorized)
When the Change Manager approves the Change Document, Solution Manager
change the document to Authorized and Create a new Administrative Correction
Document.
The Change Manager open the Administrative Correcion (new) and should select
u201CTake In Processu201D in the TaskList.But, when we click on the action button, we get the following eror message :"No actions in the worklist ".
Roles of change manager(approver)
Y_CM_CHANGE_MANAGER_COMP
Y_CM_SMAN_CHANGE_MANAGER
Y_CM_SMAN_CHANGE_MANAGER
Thanks
Imaan

Hi,
I believe that u have checked the red icon in the Administrative correction screen. Please ensure that there is no error existing, if yes, resolve it. You wll get the actions.
If that is not the case, please assign roles SAP_CHANGEMAN_OPERATOR and SAP_CHANGEMAN_ADMIN to the change manager.
This should resolve the issue.
Regards,
Rajeev

Similar Messages

  • Unable to edit the form in Personal Change Request

    Hi,
    One of the manager is trying to edit the employees information. When he navigates to edit form of personal change request, under My Crew tab of Manager Self Service in portal, unable to edit the information but he is able to add notes. in the form.
    In detail, the manager is trying to assign new manager to an employee under him(moving an employee to differen team headed by different manager so trying to replace his name in the employee's informaton). The manage is unable to change the information or unable to edit any information in the form "request for change in position/transfer"
    Could someone help me on this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ravi.
    Edited by: Ravi Alla on Jun 17, 2010 9:15 PM

    Hi,
    The issue is resolved. This is because of Acrobat JavaScript option disabled in display preferences of the form.
    Once this checkbox is enabled its working fine.
    Regards,
    Ravi.

  • Issue with creating new change request

    Hi
    We have implemented charm and we are using the workcenters for people to be able to access and create new change requests. When i click on the link to create a new change request it takes me to the screen to create a new one and it shows a New Change Request Number eg 51. With out saving or entering anything I go out and back to the workcenter and then click to creat a new change request and when it takes me back in to create a new change request it shows a new change request number i.e 52. Why would it do this?
    Santosh

    Hi,
    wel by default a transaction is autosaved..so u hav diff no each time you logged into this.
    Go to spro and choose your transaction type i.e. SDCR for change request and double click it
    and now remove the Tick from
    Early No. assignement
    This wil solve your problem so whenver it opn no appears by default only whn u press save it generates a no.
    Pls assign pts.

  • After down loads , E-scan anti virus shows WIN 32 T anatos(ES) and hence unable to go ahead with set-up .

    I dn loaded Firefox 7.01 Three times. every time E-scan antivireus prevented it ,re[prting Win 32 T anatos(ES), and mentions as a serious vpoilation. Hence could not install.

    I dn loaded Firefox 7.01 Three times. every time E-scan antivireus prevented it ,re[prting Win 32 T anatos(ES), and mentions as a serious vpoilation. Hence could not install.

  • Changing of iBase in Change Requests and Corrections being processed

    Good day!
    After going SP18 with Solution Manager our iBase component system has gone "mad": number for productive ERP-system has changed several times.
    Because of this change, a number of already approved change requests and corrections in processing can't be modified correctly. I can't change their status by regular operations from system document. Multiple correction/ change request change also won't work. And I can't change the iBase component in this documents, because the field is read only.
    How can I close all Change Requests and corrections with old iBase component number?
    Is there a way to change the iBase number in already approved Change Requests and Corrections, so i can perform operations with this system documents.

    Hello Raguraman!
    Thank you for your answer.
    Anyway I implemented the note to which you refer, and still can't change iBase component in corrections and change requests which are in process. The "iBase/Component" field is still read only and contains components which do not exist anymore.
    Do you know how can I change this values?

  • No 'Change Request' Tab in Solar_Project_Admin

    Hi,
    I am trying to implement Change Request Management with SolMan on an  Implementation Project.
    I performed different tasks like:
    - RFC connection creation (client 000 & Other mandant)
    - Logical Component creation
    - Project creation with SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN
    - Clients are defined properly
    I am not sure about the TMS configuration
    My issue is that i do not have the tab 'Change request' under 'System Landscape' in the transaction SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN
    And i would like to know why this tab is missing ?
    I would really appreciate some ideas, advices, please
    thank you

    Hi,
    I solved my issue with the missing "Change Request" tab by applying the note 802793.
    But, since i performed this action, i faced other issues when trying to create a Task List in the "Change Request" tab:
    - Warning : Probleme occured during synchronization of the system landscape
    Then
    - The project is not released. Hence cycle can not be created
    We checked :
    - RFC connections including Client:000 of all the systems
    - Authorizations on SolMan himself and in Satelites systems
    - I found interesting notes like :Note 883981 - Project consistency check which matched our issue, finally the system (with "snote") told me that it could not be apply)
    - Patch, SP up to date
    We have an error :
    - System cancel RFC destination SM_XX1CLNT000_READ, Call TMW_GET_TARGET_SYSTEMS: Function Module " TMW_GET_TARGET_SYSTEMS not found
    - Communication Error, Check the RFC Destination
    For sure, we checked every RFC Connection, everything is Green.
    That is the problem, check by check everything seems to be OK, but finally i still have blocking errors. i'm a little bit lost
    I think it could be an issue with the Transport Routes....but i'm not an expert.
    If anybody could help me please,
    Thanks in advance

  • Description of Change Request(CTS)

    Hello,
    Due to some problem, I am manually using FTP to move my cofiles and data files from QAS to PRD.
    Now, when I add the Change Request to teh Import Queue of PRD, I am unable to see the Description of the Change request.
    Could someone point out the reason for this and the possible solution.
    Thanks.

    Hi...Gautam,,
    Just keep in mind...While using FTP try to tranfer the data in BINARY FORMAT..
    Let us if it worked.
    <Deleted by Moderator>
    See the "Rules of Engagement"
    Regards
    Prashant

  • Buyer change the PO line items and end up with Awaiting Approval status.

    Can you please help to look into this issue.
    1.Buyer change the PO line items and end up with Awaiting Approval status.
    2. But user claim that she got enough limit and should not route to her manager's approval. Also check with her manager and this PO do not exist his queue.
    Any clue or tips on how to investigate on this issue. All your tips are appreciated,
    -Rick

    You cannot change these POs because their changed version has status
    'Deleted'. My proposal to fix them will be the following:
    You will have to set changed version as closed(DOC_CLOSED set to X)
    and in active version set DOC_CLOSED to space.
    __-For the above statement, Can you guys please let me know, which table DOC_CLOSED belongs to and what are the steps to do this, as i come from a functional back ground.__

  • Unable to open Adobe Reader with ability to changes PDF to word

    adobe reader with ability to change from pdf to word stopped working I purchased a new year and it does not work?

    John,
    Glad to hear everything is working. I'm surprised, too, though, because these subscriptions are on auto-renewal when you subscribe (unless you cancel before the subscription runs out).
    So....I just double-checked your account.  You had a CreatePDF basic subscription which expired on August 28 (I'm guessing that one wasn't on auto-renewal).
    In any case, I think all is well now!
    Best,
    Sara

  • OIM 11g R2 - SOA error with Auto Approval

    Hi,
    I am trying to provision a resource through catalog wizard as an end user .I have created both Operational Level and Request level approval policies with Auto Approval Enabled.The RequestID is getting generated but I am getting the following error in screen
    [Security:090304]Authentication Failed: User SOAAdminPassword javax.security.auth.login.FailedLoginException: [Security:090302]Authentication Failed: User SOAAdminPassword denied
    May I know where should I go and change the SOAAdmin Password ?.Thanks.

    I've run into the same error with oim 11gr2 bp04:
    <Mar 18, 2013 11:07:09 AM CDT> <Notice> <Stdout> <BEA-000000> <<Mar 18, 2013 11:07:09 AM CDT> <Error> <oracle.soa.services.identity>
    <BEA-000000> <<oracle.tip.pc.services.identity.jps.AuthenticationServiceImpl.authenticateUser()> authentication FAILED>>
    <Mar 18, 2013 11:07:09 AM CDT> <Notice> <Stdout> <BEA-000000> <<Mar 18, 2013 11:07:09 AM CDT> <Error> <oracle.soa.services.identity>
    <BEA-000000> <<.> Identity Service Authentication failure.
    Identity Service Authentication failure.
    Either the user name or password is incorrect. Check the error stack and fix the cause of the error. Contact Oracle Support Services if error is not fixable.
    ORABPEL-10528
    Identity Service Authentication failure.
    Identity Service Authentication failure.
    Either the user name or password is incorrect. Check the error stack and fix the cause of the error. Contact Oracle Support Services if error is not fixable.
         at oracle.tip.pc.services.identity.jps.JpsProvider.authenticateUser(JpsProvider.java:2337)
    Caused By: javax.security.auth.login.LoginException: [Security:090304]Authentication Failed: User SOAAdminPassword javax.security.auth.login.FailedLoginException:
    [Security:090302]Authentication Failed: User SOAAdminPassword denied
         at oracle.security.jps.internal.jaas.module.authentication.JpsUserAuthenticationLoginModule.login(JpsUserAuthenticationLoginModule.java:71)
         ...Did you find what the issue is? I'm finding scant information about this user named "SOAAdminPassword" (who makes up these usernames :-/).

  • Unable to make purchases with my new Mac in iTunes Store.

    I am unable to make purchases with my new Mac in iTunes Store.
    I can buy with  my iPhone or my company lap-top (Windows) without any problems. Only with my brand new MacBook Pro it is impossible.
    When I try to authorize my Mac, sure dialog window appears and I give my ID and password. Then I get error message: "There was an error storing your authorization information on this computer. The required file was not found or has a permissions error. Correct this permissions problem and try again, or deauthorize this computer if the permissions cannot be changed." The same message I get, when I try to deauthorize.
    If I try to buy anything (pushing button "Buy"), then I get following error message:
    "iTunes couldn`t download your purchase. You don`t have write access for your iTunes Media folder or a folder within it. Change permissions (in the Finder) and then choose Store--Check for available downloads".
    But I have such a permission!!! I can see it!!!
    I have even made so, that "everyone" and "staff" also  have permission "read and write" in folder iTunes and all subfolders.! :))
    When I ask for "available downloads" immediately I get the same answer: " iTunes couldn`t download your purchase. You don`t have write access for your iTunes Media folder or a folder within it. Change permissions (in the Finder) and then choose Store--Check for available downloads"
    I have done:
    1. I have used the Terminal to correct the permissions (in Finder it looked correct anyway).                    -          NO Result.
    2. With Disk Utility I have verified and repaired Disk permissions. (There were approx. 10-12 incorrect values and 3 of them  concerned iTunes and other - Jawa ).           -           NO Result.
    3. I have moved all iTunes files in Thrash and installed iTunes again (previously downloaded from App Store ).                    -          No Result.
    4. I have verified Disk permissions with Disk Utility again. There was nothing wrong, but in spite of this I have pushed the button "Repair Disc Permissions".          -          NO Result.
    5. New installation of iTunes again.           -          No Result.
    Can it be, that the reason of a problem are not correct transferred data from my old MacBook?

    with my new Mac
    You have a warranty.  Take advantage of it!  Call tech support or call the iTunes store.

  • Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

    A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one.  I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
    PROBLEM:
    There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number.  In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated.  As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon.  The first account transferred was my 14yr old son.  I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
    Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell.  I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return.  Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
    I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner.  This should be extremely simple.
    VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
    "We can't do it".  "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
    The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work.  They will un-register the account and I can register again.  There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon.  Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
    PROPER SOLUTION:
    I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating...  the fix for this is SIMPLE!!!  The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
    Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases.  These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s).  If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change.  These types of things are done everyday.
    More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes...  I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
    CONCLUSION:
    Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family.  I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory.  However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone.  With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
    If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

    I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions.  I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
    1.  Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
    I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account.  All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account.  In what possible manner is this a security risk?  Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience).  Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
    Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements.  Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example.  If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure).  Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure).  To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure).  The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it".  However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
    2.  Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
    You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later.  However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months").  The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request.  You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers.  I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts.  Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now.  Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
    As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required.  I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database.  You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
    Coding
    Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product.  Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
    The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily).  There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone).  A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences.  A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages.  I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
    The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases.  The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks.  This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
    Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number.  In terms of database management this should be simple.
    Debugging & Deployment
    The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons.  The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community.  I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one.  The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community.  There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion.  Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing.  We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
    Downtime
    If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired.  There is simply no way this is even a possible concern.  I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time.  I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan.  This is a non issue.
    Other Carriers
    You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies.  I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue.  It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
    Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer?  The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied.  He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts).  I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin.   Thanks!

  • Vendor name is deleted after the approver changes the product category.

    Hello,
    We have implemented workflow WS14000044(Completion by Purchaser) and
    WS14500015(Item-Based Main WF).
    At workflow WS14500015 level, when the approver changes the product
    category, the vendor name is deleted.The previous validation allows the
    PO creation , But the PO is created without vendor.
    Furthermore under transaction process purchase orders 'BBP_POC' the
    purchaser can not access in change mode to the vendor field in order to
    add a vendor.
    How can we give access in change mode to the vendor field for purchaser in transaction 'BBP_POC' ?
    Regards,
    Lina

    Hi,
    Which SRM version are you working on?
    Please see if the foll notes help:
    <b>801591 Source determination after item change</b>
    881346 Vendor incorrectly deleted
    873972 Sources of supply in the shopping cart with catalog items
    908178 Transferring reference: Deleted vendor
    Note 829652 - Completion workflow in shopping cart: Vendor
    789087 Changed product category: Vendor not deleted
    BR,
    Disha.
    <b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

  • How to include Change Request Title and Description in Approval email

    Trying to figure out how to include the title and description of a Change Request in the email that goes to the managers when they approve it. Below is what we have now in the email template.
    Change request $Context/Path[Relationship='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItemContainsActivity' SeedRole='Target' TypeConstraint='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Property[Type='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Id$: $Context/Path[Relationship='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItemContainsActivity'
    SeedRole='Target' TypeConstraint='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Property[Type='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Title$, created by $Context/Path[Relationship='WorkItem!System.WorkItemCreatedByUser' TypeConstraint='System!System.User']$?$DisplayName$?, requires your
    approval.
    You can complete this request by replying to this message with [Approved] or [Rejected] in your message body (note the brackets).
    Alternatively, you can complete the request by looking up Review Activity $Context/Property[Type='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Id$ under the Activity Management views in the Service Manager Console and manually approving or rejecting it there.
    This basically translates to:
    Change request CR#: Test Change Request, created by TestUser1, requires your approval.
     You can complete this request by replying to this message with [Approved] or [Rejected] in your message body (note the brackets).
    Alternatively, you can complete the request by looking up Review Activity RA# under the Activity Management views in the Service Manager Console and manually approving or rejecting it there.
    When I click on Insert, there is a huge list of items and sub-items with all kinds of properties and I don't know what to select.
    The Targeted Class of the template is Activity

    $Context/Path[Relationship='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItemContainsActivity' SeedRole='Target'
    TypeConstraint='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Property[Type='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Title$
    This translates to the Title of the CR (given that the targeted activity is contained in a CR). Simply replace
    Title with Description.
    Also if the Change Manager can approve a CR just by the description you have bigger issues (or just putting everything in the description). What about a reason? Implementation
    plan, rollback plan, testing, etc.?
    http://codebeaver.blogspot.dk/

  • HT4859 I am unable to recover a rented movie after changing one iPad for another. Music and books were easily restored

    I am unable to restore a rented movie after Changing out my iPad for a new one. All music and books were restored easily

    PS - have found other posts indicating that clips smaller than 2s or sometimes 5s, or "short files" can cause this. Modern style editing often uses short takes ! Good grief I cannot believe Apple. Well I deleted a half a dozen short sections and can export, but now of course the video is a ruined piiece of junk and I need to re-do the whole thing, the sound etc. which is basically taking as much time as the original. And each time I re-do it I risk again this lovely error -50 and again trying to figure out what thing bugs it via trial and error instead of a REASONABLE ERROR MESSAGE POINTING TO THE CLIP IT CAN'T PROCESS. What a mess. I HATE this iMovie application - full of BUGS BUGS BUGS which Apple will not fix obviously, since I had this product for a few years and see just hundreds of hits on Google about this error with disappointed users. Such junk I cannot believe I paid money for it and Apple does not support it with fixes !!!
    If anyone knows of a GOOD reasonably priced video editing program NOT from APPLE I am still looking for suggestions. I want to do more video in future, but obviously NOT with iMovie !!!

Maybe you are looking for