Unable to make posts with account - Receive website unavailable message

I have two accounts. One prior to being an oracle employee (kevinp), and one for after leaving oracle and having my Oracle account mapped to my current account (Kevin Pinsky). Almost everytime i try and make a post with my current account, i get the error:
The website you are attempting to access is currently experiencing network connectivity errors. The problem is being worked on and will be resolved as soon as possible. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and thank you for your patience.If i sign in with my old account, i don't seem to have any problems. Can one of the administrators please contact me at the email address listed under either of my account. I am unable to provide assistance to users in the Identity Management forum.
Thanks!
-Kevin

If you are using IE 9 (maybe also IE 8), could you try File > New session (then log in) as a temporary workaround?
It sometimes works for me when there seem to be some single sign-on related issue.

Similar Messages

Posting to Accounts Receivable using WPUBON, when WPUBON contains tenders

Hi all!
My client has some special requirements when invoicing specific customers in SAP ERP using WPUBON from POS DM.
They want accounts receivable to be involved, even though the WPUBON idoc have all tenders/means of payment that is required to pay for the sales in same POS transaction. (Balanced invoice with as much tenders as sales).
What seems to be SAP standard, is that a WPUBON without tenders, will post to accounts receivable.
If the WPUBON idoc includes some tenders, but not sufficiently to pay for all sales in same idoc, the tender amount will post to a balance account, while the remaining sales amount (after deducting the available tenders) are posted to the accounts receivable.
If the WPUBON idoc includes all tenders sufficient to pay for all sales in same idoc, the tender amount will post to balance accounts, and NO postings are done to the accounts receivable.
This might be logical, but for my client and its vendors it prevents them from printing the account receivable statement periodically to check it against the vendors own accounting. (The account receivable postings will be missing for sales that are paid in full in store).
For comparison: When using Payment Card processing in SAP ERP, we create sales orders that are invoiced, and when the credit cards amounts are captured, we get a financial document that posts the invoice just as we want it for WPUBON. First the invoice is posted against accounts receivable (AR), and then we get a "counter-posting" against same AR account when credit card amount is captured and clearing account/balance account for credit card company is posted.
When involving credit card as tender in WPUBON, we get postings to clearing account/balance account for credit card company , but not to AR account as we do for the sales order/invoice in SAP.
Are there customzing settings that can be done in SAP ERP to make it similar for WPUBON idocs as for sales order/invoice in SAP ERP?
Are there user exits that can "force" SAP ERP to post to AR?
Thankful for any advice!
Regards,
Oeystein Emhjellen
tlf +4795 29 25 58

Hello ,
We are also struggling with the similar problem of reconciling the AR and i would seek your help here.
I believe you have figured out all the SQL queries used to get the AR recon done so i would request if you can share the SQL queries with me as it will help us to do our piece of activity in reconciling the AR.

I am unable to make MIGO with the Purchase order

Hi Guys,
I am unable to Make MIGO with purchase order .I am getting the below error message.
The posting only in periods 2009/09 and 2009/08in company code .
I have checked with OB52 and MMRV .Kindly let me know wht need to be done .
Regards
Aravind

Dear,
Use transaction MMPV and enter following,
From Ccode     XXXX (your company code)
To Ccode         XXXX (your company code)
Period              09
Fiscal Year     2009
select Close period only and execute.
It will be done.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Unable to make purchases with my new Mac in iTunes Store.

I am unable to make purchases with my new Mac in iTunes Store.
I can buy with my iPhone or my company lap-top (Windows) without any problems. Only with my brand new MacBook Pro it is impossible.
When I try to authorize my Mac, sure dialog window appears and I give my ID and password. Then I get error message: "There was an error storing your authorization information on this computer. The required file was not found or has a permissions error. Correct this permissions problem and try again, or deauthorize this computer if the permissions cannot be changed." The same message I get, when I try to deauthorize.
If I try to buy anything (pushing button "Buy"), then I get following error message:
"iTunes couldn`t download your purchase. You don`t have write access for your iTunes Media folder or a folder within it. Change permissions (in the Finder) and then choose Store--Check for available downloads".
But I have such a permission!!! I can see it!!!
I have even made so, that "everyone" and "staff" also have permission "read and write" in folder iTunes and all subfolders.! :))
When I ask for "available downloads" immediately I get the same answer: " iTunes couldn`t download your purchase. You don`t have write access for your iTunes Media folder or a folder within it. Change permissions (in the Finder) and then choose Store--Check for available downloads"
I have done:
1. I have used the Terminal to correct the permissions (in Finder it looked correct anyway).                    -          NO Result.
2. With Disk Utility I have verified and repaired Disk permissions. (There were approx. 10-12 incorrect values and 3 of them concerned iTunes and other - Jawa ).           -           NO Result.
3. I have moved all iTunes files in Thrash and installed iTunes again (previously downloaded from App Store ).                    -          No Result.
4. I have verified Disk permissions with Disk Utility again. There was nothing wrong, but in spite of this I have pushed the button "Repair Disc Permissions".          -          NO Result.
5. New installation of iTunes again.           -          No Result.
Can it be, that the reason of a problem are not correct transferred data from my old MacBook?

with my new Mac
You have a warranty. Take advantage of it! Call tech support or call the iTunes store.

I recently installed CS4, and I can not make a connection to my website. Message an FTP error occurred and cannot make a connection to host. The remote host cannot be found.

I recently installed CS4, and I can not make a connection to my website. Message an FTP error occurred and cannot make a connection to host. The remote host cannot be found.

Open up your site definition (double-click on the site name in the File panel or choose Site > Manage Sites > Edit) and go to the Remote Info category. There, click Use Firewall (if it isn't already selected) - press Test to try the default firewall settings. If that doesn't work, click Firewall Settings. You'll see two relevant settings about 2/3 down - Firewall host and Firewall port. If Firewall port is 21, there probably is something blocking the port.
On Windows XP, you may have the Windows Firewall installed and blocking. Here's how you get to it:
To open Windows Firewall
1.
Click Start and then click Control Panel.
2.
In the control panel, click Windows Security Center.
3.
Click Windows Firewall.
Once you have that open, you'll need to set Dreamweaver as an exception to blocking:
On the Exceptions tab, click Add Program.
In the list of programs, click the name of the program (Dreamweaver) that you want to add, and then click OK. If the name of your program is not in the list of programs, click Browse to locate the Dreamweaver.exe in the Program Files folder and then click OK.
Hope this helps - Joe
Joseph Lowery
Author, Dreamweaver CS4 Bible

TS1424 What is the "Account is currently unavailable" message in the ipad 2 app store?

Hey guys,
I have an ipad 2 and when I try to download an app from the onboard app store, I keep getting this"This account is currently unavailable message". What is this and how would I go about fixing it?

Welcome to the Apple community.
There seems to be more than the average number of reports about users being unable to connect to iTunes at the moment, there may well be an issue with the servers. I would try again later and see if the problem persists.

Is Verizon unwilling or unable to fix problem with Account Owner(s)

A forum or Google search reveals several customers unhappy with how Verizon treats the account owners... count me as one. I'm sure there are many more customers who were equally unhappy but just accept Verizon's incompetence and complete the unnecessary gymnastics of un-registering accounts and then re-registering with a new username.
PROBLEM:
There are numerous scenarios that can cause a My Verizon account to have the Account Owner be listed with an incorrect telephone number. In my case, I had an account with AT&T and 3 additional numbers associated. As each account expired, I transferred the numbers to Verizon. The first account transferred was my 14yr old son. I registered a My Verizon account for management (my name & my userid) and eventually added the additional numbers, however, the Account Owner's phone number is listed as my son's cell.
Over the past 2 years (since I migrated to Verizon), I've had small problems with account notifications and other information being text to my son's cell. I've called numerous times and customer service says it's corrected, but eventually the problems return. Recently, I upgraded my phone and started using some new services like Backup Assistant and the fact that the Account Owner is associated with an incorrect number has caused even more trouble.
I simply want to keep my existing username for My Verizon and correct the cell phone number associated as the Account Owner. This should be extremely simple.
VERIZON'S SOLUTION:
"We can't do it". "Our systems don't allow us to make this change".
The Customer Service Department (or Lack of Customer Service Department) tells me that since they can't or are unwilling to do the necessary changes, their only solution is to force their customer to do their work. They will un-register the account and I can register again. There is no concern for the preferences of an existing customer (almost 3 years); there is no concern for the inconvenience caused to an existing customer who spends hundreds of dollars each month and thousands of dollars each year (I currently have 2 separate accounts with Verizon, 4 phones on my problem account and 4 phones on another for a total of 8 phones with data plans... do the math); there is no concern that I will now have to use a completely different username one that is no longer uniform with my other accounts; there is no concern that I will have to change any and all services that reference My Verizon. Quite simply... Verizon Wireless shows their Account Owners that they have no concern for us.
PROPER SOLUTION:
I have almost 25 years of Information Technology experience and over 3 years working with Call Centers (similar to Verizon's Customer Service), which explains in part why I find this so frustrating... the fix for this is SIMPLE!!! The real problem is that Verizon simply doesn't care enough to fix it because we are existing customers and not new customers.
Without going into specifics (nor could I since I don't have access to their systems), data for the My Verizon portal is contained within modifiable databases. These relational databases will be tied to other systems and other databases, but a modification of this type would just require that the portal be allowed to make the update to the appropriate field(s) within the appropriate database(s). If direct access is not attainable because of their design, it is still not too difficult to write an additional process to accommodate this change. These types of things are done everyday.
More importantly, even if Verizon was unable or unwilling to make these programming changes... I have no doubt that if Customer Service has an escalation process to their I.T. Department that a programmer with access to the application(s) and/or database(s) could easily make the change directly and almost immediately.
CONCLUSION:
Until now, my experience with Verizon has been mostly positive even to the point of recommending the carrier to friends and family. I've found their coverage area to meet my needs and the data speeds to be more than satisfactory. However, Verizon needs to remember that cellular service has essentially become a commodity and that customer retention is often based on other things than simply providing dial tone. With a monthly cell phone expense that rivals a car payment, I would think that Verizon would be more than willing to accommodate such a simple request to maintain a satisfied customer.
If you too are one of the many customers having issue with modifying the Account Owner, just resolve yourself that it appears Verizon is unwilling to make the simple correction to the My Verizon portal to satisfy our request.

I'm not 100% sure that I follow your reasoning, so please correct me if I misstate your opinions. I've numbered them so it will be easier to identify any mistakes I make.
1. Not allowing a user, customer service representative, or any Verizon representative to change the cell phone number associated with the Account Owner to another cell phone number on the same account is a security risk.
I'm not suggesting that I be allowed to change the name, social security number, or any other pertinent details related to establishing the original account. All the information pertaining to who is responsible for the bill remains the same with the single exception that the current associated cell phone number be changed to another number already listed on the account. In what possible manner is this a security risk? Frankly if the ability was enabled and someone either by mistake or incompetence made such a change the impact would simply be what I'm currently experiencing (inconvenience). Since in this hypothetical situation the ability to change this value is enabled, the "inconvenience" would easily be re-mediated by returning the value to its original state.
Furthermore, if there is some "security risk" that I'm over looking then an organization that is concerned about providing quality customer service would create procedures to accommodate customer requests and meet security requirements. Let's use a bank (with an obvious security vulnerability) and debit cards as an example. If I lose my debit card, I cannot go to my computer and print out a temporary debit card (very user friendly, but not secure). Some banks will allow you to go online and cancel the lost debit card while requesting a new one to be mailed to the address you have on file (user friendly and mostly secure). To solve this same problem at other banks might require you to go into the office and sign a form cancelling the lost debit card and confirming the address to mail you a new one (less user friendly, but highly secure). The Verizon equivalent, is me requesting that I add an existing bank account to my online banking and being told "We can't do it". However, because the bank cares so much about keeping me as a customer... they will delete my account, allow me to create another, possibly losing my historical data, have me change my username that I've been using for years, spend time adding all my online bill payments... all for the pleasure of staying their customer and getting to use their services as they should have been designed.
2. Making a software change that would allow users or CSR's to associate a different cell phone number on the account to the current Account Owner would be difficult and require downtime.
You give some time expounding this thought and I'm unaware of your web, application, and/or database experience... but I will try to address your concerns later. However, let's assume that you are correct and these changes will be difficult ("taking weeks to months"). The purpose of my post was whether Verizon was unwilling or unable to accommodate this customer request. You seem to be agreeing that Verizon is unwilling to make these changes, or at the very least, feel that Verizon has decided that the time and expense involved is of more importance than correcting an issue impacting their customers. I personally find the later equally disheartening as this has been an issue for many customers (you yourself mention experiencing the problem) and has been well documented through previous forum and Internet posts. Even by your estimations, if they had taken previous customer complaints seriously... this would have been fixed by now. Once again it seems the obvious answer is that Verizon may not consider customer service as an important factor as I do.
As far as your technology issues, I agree that more than a web page change would be required. I do take issue with comparing the change of a distributed application (operating system) that must be designed to support enumerable hardware components to the work required to makes changes to a web portal with a back-end in-house database. You could write an entire book detailing the differences between these two scenarios as they have very little in common, but I'll try to keep it focused to your points.
Coding
Coding an Operating System that must run on literally a multitude of hardware configurations and support an unending diversity of applications is an incredible endeavor and really never a finished product. Changes to an OS are constantly being made and the developers must consider hardware and software that they are not intimately familiar and occasionally even deal with 3rd parties to facilitate changes.
The change I'm advocating has a web component which would be replicated throughout their web server topology, however, these are items that Verizon's developers deal with routinely (if not daily). There are a very limited number of 3rd party concerns (a few different browsers, IE, Chrome, Mozilla & a disparate platforms such as PC, tablet, phone). A little research in the benefits of web portals (and cloud computing) verses distributed applications will clearly outline the drastic differences. A simple illustrative question (though maybe not a completely fair analogy) is how many people do you know who can code an operating system and how many people get on GoDaddy and create their own web pages. I'm not trying to insinuate that anyone who knows a little HTML can make the web portal changes, however, this isn't a difficult project for an experienced developer.
The bigger issues and ones that I alluded to in my original post are the changes that would be required to Verizon's back-end databases. The changes that would need to be made mostly likely involve multiple databases and assuming they are using a typical relational database design might require changes to key fields, adding new databases/tables, and exhaustive integrity checks. This isn't something that an average user could sit down and accomplish in an hour, however, these are simply the routine day-to-day duties of any professional database developer.
Again I reiterate... this change simply involves allowing someone (either a user, CSR, or other Verizon agent) to readily change an index record or records that correlates Account Owner to cell phone number. In terms of database management this should be simple.
Debugging & Deployment
The debugging/testing of changes made to an Operating System are amazingly complex for all the aforementioned reasons. The deployment of such changes is even more complex in that you've got to develop the mechanism to push these changes out to the entirety of the user community. I'll address deployment (or as you said dispersal) of this change because it's the easiest... quite simply there isn't one. The benefit of having a centralized web portal like My Verizon is that users come to you, not the other way around, and any change made will immediately be accessible by the user community. There is a deployment aspect in that My Verizon doesn't exist on a single web server, but again this is just the typical topology for a portal of this size and not relevant to our discussion. Debugging/Testing is an important aspect of any change and certainly Verizon has this methodology in place, however, I'll reiterate that this change should not be complex and shouldn't require extensive testing. We've also already discussed the fact that any debugging/testing only has to take place on a limited number of platforms.
Downtime
If adding the ability to change the relationship of the Account Owner to an associated cell phone number requires any downtime... the person responsible for Verizon's Development, Beta, and Production environments should be fired. There is simply no way this is even a possible concern. I've dealt with many companies with far less resources than Verizon and I assure you that changes of this nature would never require down time. I'm sure they have staff in place whose sole responsibility is to work on their continuity plan. This is a non issue.
Other Carriers
You can't possibly know how all carriers operate, though you may have some past experience with other companies. I would contend (and maybe I'm too optimistic) that a company with a focus on customer satisfaction when made aware of complaints and/or limitations in their service would seek to rectify the issue. It's quite possible that whatever other company you are referencing has fixed this issue if indeed it was similar... especially since I've hopefully bolstered my opinion that the resolution is not overly complicated.
Would you mind telling me if you deleted your 2 original comments to my post before I had an opportunity to answer? The reason I ask is that last night another user (jimfitzgerald) had posted a comment and I replied. He later posted a 2nd comment and while writing my response... all the posts were removed (his 2 posts, my reply, and your 2 posts). I'm curious if this was just a user withdrawal (though I really wish my response had remained in the thread), if there was some sort of technical issue with these forums last night, or if my response was deleted for cause by Verizon or other admin. Thanks!

Recently downloaded latest version of iTunes software, afterwards, while trying to sync iphone with PC received this error message: Unable to Load Resource not found; SyncUICoreLocalized.dll; please advise, thank you

Recently upgraded PC with latest edition of iTunes (1/30/2014), afterwards, received this error message while attempting to sync iphone with PC: Unable to load, resource not found, SyncUICoreLocalized.dll

THIS HAS EVERY APPEARANCE OF A SOFTWARE GLITCH BY APPLE ... So first suggestion is NOT to begin reinstalling various software but to await some answer & fix from Apple. Too many have same problem on various systems, in my view (I am not an Apple rep but have certainly faced many glitches over the years).
PS - LOTS of Apple software problems these days, including many people having their Contacts shredded. What's going on with Apple?

HT1414 "Your itunes account is temporarily unavailable" message when I try to purchase a TVshow. However I just dowloaded updates to my apps.

I have tried three times to download a TV series from itunes in iPad. OS 5.1.1. I get an error that my Itunes account is temporarily unavailable. Yet I can download updates to my apps on the iPad with no problem. Any suggestions? Could this be a credit card issue? If so how do I check on that info?

Same here - will let me purchase individual episodes, but not subscribe...can't find why.

Unable To Make Connection With FreeTalk Website

I have tried to reactivate my Freetalk unit (wall plugin). There used to be an area on the freetalk site that would reset the device and always worked when I had a problem. Now I don't see that option.
I've tried doing a reset on the unit and all I'm getting is a solid red light. I'm hoping I can get the website up and try a reset from there to start.
I've had over a year of steady service, but, I'll go with another option for VOIP if this is an indication or MS's takeover.
Thanks in advance for any help with this or an update if they are down.

The only reset page I'm aware of would be the reset page available locally. Generally that would be something along the lines of this address:
http://192.168.1.X/administration/popup-factory-reset.php
This address link is found on the system settings page.
What I have found is the device tends to grab an IP then go offline and reset itself. In my mind, that is indicative of at least one of two things:
1. The device does a pre-boot (bootloader/POST) and fails to load a valid image due to corruption in memory (ROM/RAM/NVRAM).
2. During POST one of the pieces of hardware is failing. A defective part or a cracked trace due to overheating/device shock.
The factory reset procedure available externally on the device should be near equivalent to the factory reset webpage link. My biggest complaint with the device is no procedure openly exists to the general public that addresses condition 1.
As far as something getting certified. It usually means that it met the minimum requirements and passed a barrage of tests thrown at it by the certifier. If a device passes a series of tests and works flawlessly how is anyone to know how long the device will hold up in the real world for 1 month, 1 year or 10 years in varying environments?
In the dinosaur age of computers, things seemed to last forever. Nowadays with the increased speed of devices, mass production, lead-less solder (for our "safety"), accuracy and failure rates seem to go up. The sad thing is having a warranty on a device is a guarantee by the manufacturer that is will last at least that long. If it doesn't, it gets replaced under warranty. If it lasts longer, you're on borrowed time. There is an expected lifetime for everything but consider it like a car warranty (Ex. 10 year/100,000 miles). In the computer world you're more than likely going to hit the year mark before you get the mileage out of it.
If I run across what I deem a lemon, I'm more than likely to chose another product or just continue to look elsewhere.

Posting in accounts receivable

You want to post via a special G/L indicator which was not maintained completely in the system. The specification on which reconciliation account is to be updated in the general ledger is missing.
this is the error during the posting down payment using tc (f-29)
Moderator: Please, search before posting

Dear,
Please check setting of special GL indicator which you are using for posting in OBXR. Select special GL indicator,go in it, look for special GL account and a reconciliation account maintained against it. Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards

Unable to create Customer in Accounts Receivable

Hi,
I am using Oracle Applications : 12.0.4. I that I am trying to create a customer, But the system is flaging the follwoing error.
FND_SESSION_MANAGEMENT.UPDATESESSIONCONTEXT SQLException: java.sql.SQLException: OALL8 is in an inconsistent state
Could some one help me out in resolving the issue.
Thanks,
Vijendra

In Release 12.0.4:
Please check and do the necessary entry of the Customer Address, with the proper state, county, city, and province., because in R12 it is become mandatory and address need to be checked.
this information may helps.
Regards,
NSrikanth

EA6350 AC1200+ Unable to make connection with Internet

Hi! Just wanted to ask if you could help with this issue I just bought the EA6350 AC1200+ Wifi Router. I tried to set up the router in the same manner, step by step as the instructions tell me to and the Wifi is still telling me that it doesnt detect any internet connection.Whenever i login to the Smart Wifi Menu, the screen tells me that there is a connection between the computer and the router, but no connection with the internet. I have tried to check if its my internet's fault, by just simply connecting the cable to my laptop and the internet works just fine. My internet connection via LAN cable doenst require any login/password. Please let me know if anyone can help! Thank you so much! nting007

@nting007 Reset the router to factory defaults. Press and hold the reset button on the back panel of your router for about 10 seconds then release. Once accomplished, follow the steps on this link.

Problem with accounts receivable F.30

Hi, everybody, may be you can help me here.
The problem is: in the transaction F.30 (Display evaluations)
(Due date analysis>Evaluation by planning group>For company code)
Well, i have the list but only till 01.10.2006 and there are definitly more documentes posted, cause i can see them in Transaction FB03.
Any thougths,
P.D. i'm new in all this SAP stuff, so i know very little.
Thanx.

Hi,
Thoose evaluations use their own seperate database.
To use them you will have to schedule a job to periodically transfer the data to that used by the evaluations.
regards

Unable to make contact with ipad

Hi wonder if any one can help me ...i have a kindle fire Hd that has skype already installed my main three people whom i want to skype are on ipads an although i have their correct email icannot seem to skype them as it rings out but they do not recieve the call ..how can i connect to their ipad....?

iCloud: Troubleshooting iCloud Calendar
iCloud: Advanced Calendar and iCal troubleshooting

Unable to make posts with account - Receive website unavailable message

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for