Unable to prevent Price change for Outline Agreement

Dear Experts,
Once Outline Agreement is generated in SAP, I do not want to allow users to change the price.
I have tried with " Field Selection at Document level" using ME32-Change outline agreement field selection.
I select "Quantity and Price" and select check box Display for  "Price and Price Unit",Price Date", "Condition Group".
This will not allow price change at item details level (field grayed out) but user can still select Item condition (for Example PB00) and change the price there.
Is there any solution for this ?
Ideally I want to do this for a particular Document type of Outline Agreement only.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Raju

Hi Ramki,
Thnka s for you reply.
This is not the desired solution. I can not ask Client to change to create different uses for create and change .
In the buinsess process , mostly create an change users are same for outline agreements.
I do not wna to restrict by User Authorization either as this is also not a 100% solution.
Still  looking at configuration level only to restrict changes in Pricing for outline agreements.
Regards,
Mitesh Desai

Similar Messages

  • Report print price indicator for outline agreements

    Hi Gurus,
    Good day. I would like to ask if there is a report that we can generate to be able to view which contract items have a print price ticked/ unticked.
    Appreciate your help.
    Thank you so much

    What if i just wan to see contracts with unticked print price indicator.
    In ME3N > Dynamic selections >Purchasing Document Item > Select Print Price > Double click, Print price comes on right side, now click on Multiple selection tab (tab with arrow) which is at right side, new window opens, there select tab 'Exclude Ranges' & enter Lower & Upper Limit as 'X', execute, enter all your values & execute again, it will exclude the items which are having print price.

  • Mass price change for inforecord

    Hi All,
    Can I do a mass price change for inforecords? We are in ECC 6.0....
    I have checked transaction MEMASSIN but there is no field for price in this txn.
    Regards,
    V S

    Yes it is Possible. But, not thru any Mass Transactions.
    You need to Perform a BDC for ME12. Go to ME12 and Select Conditions Tab and Select the Gross Price Condition and Click on remove Line and Create New Gross Condition with New Price and Per Unit.
    Hope it will Solve ur Query.

  • CO88-Error :Perform the planned price change for material

    Hi Experts,
    While running CO88 i get this error. "Perform the planned price change for material ". My material is manage at S and it doesn't have any marked cost. The status is FR and no other status on cost etimate for the article are active. what i shoul do? why if i run the PP order with KO88 i don't have any error?
    Please help i'm facing the closing period.

    Hi,
    If dynamic price change is active in your system the first posting in the new period of this material tries to
    - release a future cost estimate of that period OR
    - change the price to the future price in accounting view
       (if the future price date is reached)
    Unfortunately this dynamic price change does not work in order settlement. Therefore you are asked to perform the price change first by t-code CKME (or CK24).
    If you are using price determination control 3, any price change or release should always be the first transaction in a new period to avoid any inconsistencies.
    The dynamic price release will only release the price with transactions which involve material movement and this is not the case by posting invoices and order settlements.
    if you are in period 12/2009 then a settlement in 12/2009 does not require the release cost estimate of 01/2010.
    But if you are already in 01/2010 therefore settlement in 12/2009 is a posting into the previous period. This will change also data of the current period. Therefore the cost estimate has to be released first.
    Another option, if you don't want to receive this message, would be to change this message from Error to Warning (check note 434752).
    Please follow the following steps:
    T-CD:OMRM
    Message M8 394
    =>you set the message type to '-' for error message M8394, that means no message is to be issued.
    regards
    Waman

  • Report for outline agreement

    Hi Guys:
    I`m wondering on R/3, is there some transaction code or dynamic selection i can use to run a report for outline agreement. i am looking for one report that will generate following information: Outline agreements that has not been used since August 2007 till now, which means no Purchase orders drawn off the outline agreement.
    In other word, Outline agreement with Purchase order but has not been used since a particular date.
    Much appreicate your help indeed.
    Forrest

    Hi Manish:
    Thanks a lot.
    If i specify document date from 01.08.2007 to 14.05.2009, meanwhile, input RAHM into Scope of list. Then i will get one report including all the outline agreement created in this period, with filter, i think i can pick up outline agreement is not used until now.
    I have another concern, how about the outline agreement created before 01.08.2007, but these outline agreement has not been used from 01.08.2007 to 14.05.2009.
    Waiting for your solution.
    Forrest

  • Delivery date for outline agreement requisition

    Hi all,
    When I create a purchase requisition (ME51N) for a non stock material, for example, using req type NB or FO, the delivery date defaults to the current date. If I create a req with the same information but using type RV (outline agreement) the delivery date defaults to blank. I found out that in the IMG, under the req doc type config, the type RV is associated with the "Control indicator for purchasing document type" = R (Purchase requisition for outline agreement). If I clear this field, the delivery date starts defaulting to the current date. I created 2 reqs side by side (one with the indicator "R" and the other without) and I did not find any difference except for the delivery date. Does anyone know what the impact is to clear field V_T161-BSAKZ for doc type RV?
    Thanks.

    Hi
    The control indicator "R" determines Filed selection. ie Which requires mandatory or optional. For Doc types RV field selection groups is RVB , in that Delivery date is not a Required/optional/Dsiplay field., this works in conjunction with control indicator "R".
    Hence when you try to create with Doc type RV and control indiactor "R" it is not propsoding the current date. When you remove Control indicator "R" the field selcetion groups becomes NBB , in that Delviery date is Required filed, so the system proposes the current date .
    The impact of removal of control indicator "R" is nothing.
    Regards
    DRN
    Give points if ok

  • Price changes in Scheduling Agreement

    Hi,
    What is the best way to handle price changes in a Scheduling Agreement? From what I saw, the validity periods of the prices maintained in a scheduling Agreement is based on the GR date. Is there any way we can change this? The requirement is to make the validity price work on the delivery schedule date.
    Right now, whenever a price change happens, we have to add a new line in the scheduling agreement. This doesn't seem right. Please advise.
    Thanks
    Ranjeet

    Hi,
    Your date for pricing is controlled by Pricing date category u maintain in Vendor master >Purchasing view
    If you select delivery date as your pricing and if there are many delivery dates the first delivery date is taken as
    the reference for pricing
    But if there is no much price variation between delivery schedule date and Goods receipt you can keep that as
    goods receipt date
    Check out whatever suitable
    BR
    Diwakar

  • Price Change in Scheduling Agreement

    Dear All,
    I have created a SA for one material. Here we want to procure that material for 10 plants/Company codes. So i have created 10 different line items. After partial GR the price got changed for this material. Now I want to change the price which effects from today onwards for all the plants/CC. Is there anyway so that instead of changing the price in all the line items, i will change once, so that new price will apply to all the line items. Looking for inputs
    regds,
    CB

    Hi
    There are 2 options.
    Either you have to change the price for all the line item in the scheduling agreement
    Or Change the price in the Purchasing Inforecord for all the plants and set the price date category as 5-GR Date. And change price date category in Scheduling agreement as well. In future you can maintain the price only in the Purchasing inforecord.
    Since the valuation area is at plant level you have no option to enter the price in one place to effect on all the plants.
    Hope it helps
    Thanks/karthik

  • Prevent price changes

    Is there a way in SAP to prevent some of my users from adjusting prices on sales orders? 
    All my items have default prices and I don't want my clerks entering the orders to be able to change the prices.  However, in some situations I do need for the supervisors to have the ability to change the prices.  Is this possible?

    Hi
    You cannot use Sp_transaction notification for your process unless you want to hardcode some users in your code .
    If you donot want it to be change for anybody then you can use sp_transaction notification
    Otherwise use approval procedure
    Other work around ,
    Simple go to the form setting i and change the field properties ..visible but not active ..you need to log in as that  user and it is user specific ...do it for the user you want
    Hope this helps
    Bishal

  • Function Module for outline agreement

    Dear Sir,
    I want to know the function module for contract/outline agreement from where I can fetch the details of release orders against the given contract.
    Regards
    Amit Agarwal

    Hi
    Go to SE37 enter the Outline agreement and press F4
    you can see the function module
    (or) Post the same message in  SAP ABAP forum
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Price change for a material

    Hi Experts,
    Need ur help urgently,
    i have made a PO taking a material with std. price say 1 rs. but before doing GRN i changed the price to 4 rs. Now, when iam
    doing GRN , system post the document taking the old price (1rs.) of the material.
    I want that system should calculate the cost with the new price defined for the material ( 4rs.)
    In Accounting 1 tab of the material display MM03 :
    price control for valuation data for prevoius period is S
    and, price control for valuation data for prevoius year is also S
    Need ur assistance as I am new to MM
    Thanks.
    Dhruv

    Hi Experts,
    Need ur help urgently,
    i have made a PO taking a material with std. price say 1 rs. but before doing GRN i changed the price to 4 rs. Now, when iam
    doing GRN , system post the document taking the old price (1rs.) of the material.
    I want that system should calculate the cost with the new price defined for the material ( 4rs.)
    In Accounting 1 tab of the material display MM03 :
    price control for valuation data for prevoius period is S
    and, price control for valuation data for prevoius year is also S
    Need ur assistance as I am new to MM
    Hi,
    Dhruv,
    Whenever you create purchase order price is suggested from info records (if valid conditions are maintained) , if not from your last purchase order. If info record doesnt exists you have enter the prive manually in the item overview of purchase order. The price mechanism whether Moving average or standard is used basically for valuation purposes only. They are never suggested in purchase order.
    If you have updated your material master record with standard price and has changed it. Then it should be valuated at new standard price during good receipt
    It is always with standard price valuation that good receipt is always valuated at standard price and not purchase order price.
    Kindly check your material master record details.
    Also which transaction you have used for changing the standard price in material master record.Use MM02 Tcode and change the standard price as you like.
    I hope this is useful
    Regards,
    Tushar Patankar

  • Price Change for Revenue Recognition

    Dear experts,
    I am using Revenue Recognition of type B with Revenue Recognition before invoicing.
    I have an issue/question about the way price changes are treated in the functionality.
    The below example is used to describe the issue for your understanding:
    1.Pricing master data: $100/EA
    2.Price of item in sales order: $100/EA
    3.Qty in sales order: 10 EA
    4.Delivery & Goods issue: 10 EA
    5.Revenue Recognised (VF44) for: $1000
    Accounting Entry:
    DR Unbilled Accounts Receivable $1000
    CR Revenue $1000
    6.Change in pricing master data: $120/EA
    7.Partial Invoice for: 2 EA @ $120/EA
    Accounting Entry:
    DR Customer $240
    CR Unbilled Accounts Receivable $240
    8.Partial Invoice for balance qty: 8 EA @ $120/EA
    Accounting Entry:
    DR Customer $960
    CR Unbilled Accounts Receivable $760
    CR Deferred revenue $200
    9.Subsequent Revenue Recognition (VF44)
    Accounting Entry:
    DR Deferred revenue $200
    CR Revenue $200
    As you can see in the example above, the amount of the price difference is not credited to sales in step 7. From what I have seen so far the additional amount due to price difference gets credited to sales only after the total invoice value for the item exceeds the revenue recognized.
    Is there any option to set the system so that the price difference is taken into account for revenue recognition during each invoicing (even
    when the invoicing is partial) ?
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    The price difference will not go to Sales in Step 7.  The reason being Revenue Recognition works on the item rather than the amount.  Since you have run F-44, the system finds the same in Unbilled Receivables and posts to that account.
    For updating the price changes, you have to run VF46 to cancel the original RR entries.  In this case, it will just clear of the RR lines if realization has not happened and post a reversal if realization has happened.  This txn will also create a new RR line for VF44 which you can process.
    Refer Note 820417 Implementation guide for RR.  Download the attachments and look into Part2 doc page 13.  This explains how to deal with price changes in sales document.
    Hope this helps.
    Ravi.

  • Price Change for Consignment

    Hi guys,
    I have a situation where by there is a price change during a consignment process.
    *_17/11/2010-Consingment Fill Up_                                                                
    Material A-100 Unit                                        
    Price $15                                                  
    *_20/11/2010-Consignment Fill Up_
    Material A-100 Unit
    Price $20
    How do I configure the system that, when I do a consignment Issue for 150 Unit on the 25/11/2010, I should invoice as:
    Price as on the 17/11/2010 is 100*$15 = $1500
    Price as on the 20/11/2010 for the remaing 50 units is 50*$20 = $1000
    So total to be invoice in the consignment issue is $2500
    Is this possible?
    Edited by: Saravanand Naiker on Nov 16, 2010 10:09 PM

    hi,
    i understood your question:
    as per standard functionality provided by SAP this might not be possible by taking one single material:
    1. if you are using batch management implement LIFO strategy for your requriment.
    2. other wise this goes to development part.
    take pricing date into consideration VBKD-PRSDT & go back and check if any materials exists with previous pricing date if exists.
    system has to inform you to take that materials first.
    3. in simple terms create two materials for the same and process.
    regards,
    balajia

  • Quantity Proration in case of Price change for a Disconnected Installation

    Hi Experts,
    As we know if any installation is disconnected then interpolation or Extrapolation of MR will result to Zero consumption , Logically it is correct because after disconnection you can not have consumption .
    Because of this if Price change happen in-between a billing period and same installation is disconnected then whole quantity is getting charge either on new price or in old price but normal Quantity proration is not happening .
    Example : Bill from 15.04.2014 to 15.05.2014 (30 days)
    Quantity =   2000
    Price change on 01.05.2014
    Normal Bills
    Consumption Amount = 1000 * Old Price + 1000 * New Price
    But in case of Disconnected installation
    Consumption Amount= 2000* Old Price + 0 * New Price
    But I wants Quantity Proration to take place in-case of Disconnected installation as well
    (One solution I have is Z Variant for QUANTI14 )
    Please Help if you know any user exit for MR interpolation or something like that.

    The best and easiest solution for this is.
    Inside FM "ISU_MRRESULT_DEMARCATE" we have one more FM "ISU_DB_V_EDISCOBJ_SELECT_LNR_H" where system checks whether this contract is disconnected or not if disconnected then it will update variable "y_disconnected" as "X" so at the end of "ISU_DB_V_EDISCOBJ_SELECT_LNR_H" FM SAP provided one enhancement space their based on your requirement you can Change "y_disconnected" value as initial so system will do proration as it is non-disconnected installation.

  • MR21 price change for S price material

    Hi all,
    We are facing an unique problem.
    Earlier on 05May, price was updated for a S price material from A to B thru MR21 having posting date 01May. Price change document and its accounting document has got generated successful. On checking the price on 25May, price is A i.e. Old price. I listed the price change documents for the material, I was not able to find the any document after the above said date. So far the movements has happened in old price.
    Further I checked in MBEW, price is A i.e.Old price. In table MBEWH for the april period, price is B.
    New price has got updated nowhere apart from MBEWH and price change document.
    Anyone can advice, how this has happened. What is the reason
    Regards
    Suddy

    you are working with a fiscal year variant, as your fiiscal year does not match with the calendar year.
    In general the month of the posting date is equal with the period, however, using a fiscal year variant the posting date is checked against a customizing table to determine to which period the posting has to be made.
    Those variants are defined in OB29
    and they are assigned to company code in OB37.
    so check OB37 first to find which variant is assigned to your company, then use OB29 to see the definition of the variant.
    Maybe the first day of the new month is defined to fall into the old period.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I get a refund of an over payment and return of a late payment charge?

    Today I get an email saying I owed $403 and was a month behind-Didn't sound right but I went ahead and paid the $403 online-when I got home I looked in an other area of my account and it shows that I did pay last month on time..From what I am reading

  • Trigger email if no file found

    Hi, I have a requirement like below: Every day interface will run between 4.00 AM to 4.30 AM. In this case file will be picked from aplication server(NFS) and processed by using proxy(FILE to PROXY communication). In this stipulated time 4.00 AM to 4

  • OWB 9.2 locaiton registration error

    I'm new to OWB. Here is what I'm trying to do: 1. Set up runtime platform, create design reporsitory andcreate a project. 2. Create module with location Loc1 defined. 3. Create Runtime Repository Connection Rtrc1 4. Start deployment manager to regist

  • PO wise payment required

    Hi I made payment for 3 MIRO documents together. From which TCode i can get report where i can link payment to my Purchase Order

  • War Game

    Hi, I was wondering if anyone could help me to make the java game War. I have these two classes, the Deck class and Card class: import java.util.*; public class Deck { // Instance Variables private Card[] theDeck = new Card[52]; // Set up random numb