Unable to settle internal order

Hi ALL,
Currently we are trying to settle an internal order but every time we execute KO88, we get a message that either there is nothing to settle or it is already settled.
i have the checked the balance of the internal order account in kob1 and it is showing a balance.
the settlement rule also is set at 100% FUL.
plz suggest any other option that needs to be checked to fix the issue.
regards
Arvind Kumar

Hi ALL,
the issue has been resolved.
someone had passed a manual jv from the internal order account to balance sheet account.
this was done as a Revex PO was raised with the internal order GL account number instead of the material expense gl account.
the migo was reversed and correct gl account was entered.
thanks all for your help.
regards
Arvind Kumar

Similar Messages

Standard report for settled internal orders

Hi All,
Is there any standard report available in Asset for settled internal orders.
We can able to see in S_ALR_87013019. But all Internal orders are appearing. I am not able to see settled orders. How to identify those... (Like flag color difference should be required for settled and open).
Thanx in advance.
Regs,
Bhaskar

Hi All,
Is there any standard report available in Asset for settled internal orders.
We can able to see in S_ALR_87013019. But all Internal orders are appearing. I am not able to see settled orders. How to identify those... (Like flag color difference should be required for settled and open).
Thanx in advance.
Regs,
Bhaskar

Cancel settlement internal order

Hi,
I just created the AUC and Internal Order then run settlement Internal Order (KO88), but there's something wrong at the time of create Internal Order. Whether we can cancel the settlement IO? if yes, how to do that ?
Thanks
Ocep00

Hi
In KO88 > Menu Settlement > Reverse
Regards
Ajay M

Differences in parallel currencies after settlement internal order

Hi everybody,
Please help me with any tip.
After the settlement of internal order, the balance of currency of the company (10-BRL) is zero, it is OK, but the problem is the balance in hard currency (40-USD) there is difference.
Scenario Currency FI (OB22):
> 1st local currency:
Crcy Type: 10 - company code currency - Currency: BRL
Valuation: 0 Legal Valuation
ExRateType: M - Standard translation at average rate.
Srce curr: 1 - Translation taking transaction currency as a basis
TrsDte typ: 3 Translation date
> 2st local currency:
Crcy type: 40 - Hard currency
Valuation: 0 - Legal Valuation
ExRateType: M - Standard translation at average rate
Srce curr.: 1 - Translation taking transaction currency as a basis
TrsDte typ: 1 - Document date
Scenario Currency CO (OKKP):
> Assignment Control > CoCd->CO Area = Cross-company-code cost accounting
Currency Type:10 - Company code currency
Currency: BRL
No flag : Diff. CCode Currency
No flag: Active
The test is:
1st - Posting with internal order (FB60)
2nd - Settlement internal order (KO88)
3rd - FBL3N
Look the result by currency:
G/L: 800068, Post Date: 30/11/09, Doc Date: 27/11/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00-, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 666,67-
G/L: 800068, Post Date: 27/11/09, Doc Date:01/10/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 500,00
Balance of LCurr: BRL = 0,00
Balance of LCurr2: USD = 166,67 (Difference). Is there a procedure to dealing with differences in hard currency (USD) after settlement of internal order?
Tks
Soraia

In your opinion, Does the configuration in OKKP is correct?
Scenario Currency CO (OKKP):
> Assignment Control > CoCd->CO Area = Cross-company-code cost accounting
Currency Type:10 - Company code currency
Currency: BRL (Brazilian Currency)
No flag : Diff. CCode Currency
No flag: Active
Where is BRL I think that should be USD.
The system do the exchange rate ok, but what about the difference because of it? Is there any problem continue with it?
G/L: 800068, Post Date: 30/11/09, Doc Date: 27/11/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00-, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 666,67-
G/L: 800068, Post Date: 27/11/09, Doc Date:01/10/09, LCurr: BRL, Amount: 1000,00, LCurr2: USD, Amount loc curr2: 500,00
Balance of LCurr: BRL = 0,00
Balance of LCurr2: USD = 166,67 (Difference).
Thank you!
Soraia

How to settle Internal Orders in background

Friends
T-code KO8G is used to settle the internal orders in foreground.
Is there any T code available in SAP to settle Internal Orders in background ?
Please let me know if more details required
Thanks
MVS

Hi,
In KO8G selection screen under "Processing Options" you have a check box for "Background Processing".
Regards
Sreekanth

Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element. (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
I configure a G/L account with no cost element. KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element.
Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
Failed solution: I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number. The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement. I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined. The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution. I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order. The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
Question:
Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

It is more of a reporting issue really.
The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element. This is the business process the users currently have. Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly. This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement. Now that report no longer shows the settlement. How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

Error while settling Internal Order to CWIP asset using T-cdoe KO88

Hi experts,
While settling the amount from Internal Order to particular CWIP asset, i am getting the following error
"Define a number range for settlement documents"
Kindly provide me the solutions how to go about it.
Thanks in advance
Bashyam

Hi,
Go to T.Code KANK
Click on "Maintain Groups" (F6)
Assign a suitable number range to object KOAO
Regards,
Kenneth

Problem in Reversal of settled Internal Order

I am trying to reverse some internal orders already settled. But while doing test run for collective reversing of settled I.O. I am getting error that I.O number is missing in the text field. I think while reversing system is not picking data for text field. The user have tried this before and it as working then. There is an OSS note 126363 on simmilar problem but not exact problem and it rfered it as a programing error.
Any body facing such experience or any suggetion is welcomed. This is an urgent requirement as user want to close the period.
Regards,
Arun Agarwal

Hi,
You can reverse a posted settlement using the settlement transaction, as long as the settlement documents that belong to it have not been reorganized. However, you can only reverse the most recently carried out settlement. If you have to reverse an older settlement, you first have to reverse the most recent settlements (following it) in reverse chronological order.
The above is simply conceptual. But in your case, your problem appears to be something different. You can consider debugging the case to find out the cause so that the remedial action can be determined.
You can also check the relevant document type to make the document header text as 'not required' to complete the process.
Please let me know if this helps.
Cheers.
Dhananjai

Showing Settled Internal Orders

Hi,
In our company at the end if each month we settle our Internal Orders to a number of cost centres, so when we then run a report for that Internal Order(after settling) it shows as blank on the report....and thats fine.
Now there is a requirement to see what the costs sitting on the Internal Order were origianlly....before they were settled to cost centres, is their any report/or way to show the Internal Order before we settled it?

Hi,
You can check the line items posted to Internal Order for the specific range of posting dates in transaction code KOB1. I think this report should be helpful to analyse the posting before making settlement.
Thanks
Murali.

Settling Internal order

Hey Guys,
I am using internal orders as capital investment programs.
These are the steps i did
1- created the order( AUC gets creted automatically)
2- entered the budget
3 Posted to the order
4- settled it- Using processing type 1( automatic)- after settlign the settlement rule populates through config. This moves the cost from the IO to the AUC
now i need to settle the order again using processing type 8( full settlement) to move values from the AUC to the asset.
It gives me the message that there is nothign to settle or the order is settled.
am i missing any step?
please advice
THanks,
Zaid

Thanks for the reply-
my settlement rule is
CAT recevier percent settlement
FXA 3-0 100 AUC
This settlment rule comes up automatically once i settle the I/O.
I need to add a settlement rule below this?
please clarify
Thanks,
Zaid

Settling Internal Orders to a AUC

Hi,
Can somebody please help me. I need the tcodes and steps to create an internal order which will settle to a AUC.
Will assign points if useful
Thanks

Creation of Internal Order- KO01
Maintain Settlement receiver as the AUC asset
Settle the Internal Order- KO88
Now the values have come to AUC asset
Distribution of AUC- AIAB
Enter the Settlement receiver as the Main Asset
Settlement of AUC- AIBU

Settle internal order to primary cost element

Hi all,
We use internal orders to collect costs for cars. We differentiate between fuel and maintenance costs. Both cost elements are set up being primary cost elements.When settling the internal order costs are settled using a secondary cost element. What do I need to change and where do I have to change this to have the cost settled against the original, primary cost elements (fuel/maintenance)?
Any help is appreciated.
Best regards, Paul

Hi,
Check the setting
Controlling ->Internal Orders ->Actual Postings->Settlement->Maintain Allocation Structures.
& also check the settlement profile.
Regards,
Deepak

Posting settled internal order costs to PM Order

Hi,
Our client doesn't have PM module upto now. So they posted all the maintenance costs to internal orders. All the internal orders are settled properly. Now they want to implement PM module. They want the costs previously posted in internal order should be reflected in PM orders.
How it will possible? Any inputs please.. is the historical PM order helps???
Regards
Radha

Radha,
Technically speaking, yes its possible.
But do you know which costs were booked against each equipment?
Even if you do, then you will need to write an ABAP program to create PM orders and then move the costs from the settlement orders to the PM orders in the period thatg they were accrued. This is a big job.
If you only need a record of the equipment costs (ie not move the actual costs) then the simpler approach would be to use Historical Orders.
PeteA

Error while settling internal order KO88 / KO8G)

Hi Friends,
We are in ECC5.0
I have an expense G/L account. Cost center and Business Area are mandatory to post in to this G/L account.
I posted some transactions to this G/L account with Business Area, Cost center and Internal order values in the document. When I try to settle this internal order to AUC, I am getting error 'Cost center is mandatory for G/L account xxxxxx'.
I am not sure, why it is not picking the cost center and Business Area from the original document. Please could any one advice me?
Thanks in advance

Hi Waman and Ajay,
Thanks for your information.
Sorry to ask a basic question:
while we run the settlement, will G/L entry have a cost center in the document?
If I have a debit line in expense G/L with cost center cc1 and order or1, when I settle this order, it will post a credit entry. But I am not sure if this credit entry will have cost center in that line?
If yes, how will be the entry for multiple debit lines with multiple costcenters? Because, when we settle the G/L, it will post only one line item as credit for the total amount.
Please could you help me in understanding?
Thanks,

Ko88 unable to settle combined order

We are running costing run for period 3, there is 1 combined
order which was not able to do settlement using KO88 or CO8b.
It can be settled on 31/3/08 but when we have do some changes to
the settlement on 1/4/08, so we have reversed the settlement and amend the settlement rules. Then it was not able to settle for period
3 now.
Was it due to some additional control in SAP?

Hi, Ajay,
Thanks for your reply.
I have to go to AS02 to change the asset's value date instead of KO02 and change AUC's value date, because the date was not updated by KO02.
I also need to change settlement rule by changing order's settlement type from FUL to PRE.
When I run KO88, I choose "by period".
The settlement finally works.
Thanks a lot!

Unable to settle internal order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for