Unable to telnet using saprouter.

Hi Guys,
I have a problem in using saprouter. When i m trying to edit the saprouttab I am getting a message that it is unable to open saprouter director. the thing is I dont have the dirctory /usr/sap/saprouter. I am using saprputer from exe folder. This is following error when i m reading the saprouter log.
this is saprouttab file
P * * *
P * * telnet
P * * 23
the following is the log from dev_rout log
trc file: "dev_rout", trc level: 1, release: "46D"
Tue Sep 20 14:15:10 2005
SAP Network Interface Router, Version 34, August 30 1999
command line arg 0:     saprouter
command line arg 1:     -r
ERROR => fopen ./saprouttab (2: No such file or directory) [nixxrout.c   266
6]
***LOG Q0I=> NiRRouttab: fopen (2: No such file or directory) [nixxrout.c 2667]
cannot open ./saprouttab: all routing disabled!!!
Could not open permission table
dev_rout: END
Is there any way to change the path in SAP so that it is directed to /usr/sap/SID/SYS/exe instead of /usr/sap/saprouter which i dont have..
Please reply ASAP this is very urgent.
thank u,
Irshad Mohammed

Hi Guys,
I m getting this log file I think there is some problem here
Fri Feb 15 10:23:49 2008 INIT_LOGFILE
Fri Feb 15 10:23:49 2008 READ ROUTTAB /sapmnt/DEV/exe/saprouttab o.k.
Fri Feb 15 10:24:49 2008 CONNECT FROM C0, host 127.0.0.1 (loopback)
Fri Feb 15 10:24:49 2008 SEND INFO TO C0
Fri Feb 15 10:24:49 2008 DISCONNECT   C0, host 127.0.0.1 (loopback)
Fri Feb 15 14:54:20 2008 CONNECT FROM C0, host 127.0.0.1 (loopback)
Fri Feb 15 14:54:20 2008 DISCONNECT   C0, host 127.0.0.1 (loopback)
Fri Feb 15 14:54:20 2008 SHUTDOWN

Similar Messages

  • Unable to telnet to LINUX desktop

    I've installed Linux 2.6.9-42.0.0.0.1 ( downloaded from oracle's website) and I'm unable to telnet to this machine from my laptop.
    I get this error
    C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>telnet oragrid
    Connecting To oragrid...Could not open connection to the host, on port 23: Connect failed
    This is my first linux trial so I guess you need to tell me from scratch regarding starting the telnet.
    Thanks
    Mukul

    Mukul,
    Search this forum for "telnet". You'll see threads such as this one:
    Re: FTP & TELNET  in Enterprise Linux
    Bottom line, I recommend you use ssh rather than telnet. If you're connecting from Windows, download Putty, for example.
    Sergio

  • Unable to telnet on command prompt for udp port 514, but able to on cmd for tcp port 514

    I am unable to telnet on command prompt for udp port 514. But when I use packet snifer or wireshark I am able to see traffic going to the targetted server from udp port 514. I thought it might be a firewall issue blocking the port from communicating. But
    I figured out that windows firewall is disabled. I am able to make similar connections on the cmd for tcp port 514.
    I did a netstat -an and see that udp:514 is enabled and listening on the server.
    What am I missing here?

    Telnet actually supports TCP only. You might want to try another tool as suggested here: http://serverfault.com/questions/263032/how-to-connect-to-a-udp-port-command-line
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Ahmed MALEK
    My Website Link
    My Linkedin Profile
    My MVP Profile

  • Is telnet use local tnsnames.ora?

    I was suprise that when the local tnsnames.ora of client was not correct,sqlplus at telnet can't connect to server,and when the file was modify,I can use sqlplus connect to oracle through telnet.
    is telnet use local tnsnames.ora?

    This is simply impossible.

  • "Unable to Connect" using Firefox and Windows 7. Have tried all the suggestions on this website to no avail. I need firefox for my work! Please help!

    "Unable to Connect" using Firefox and Windows 7. Have tried all the suggestions on this website to no avail. I need firefox for my work! Please help!
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == Since I downloaded Firefox

    same here my AV is ESET, i already unblock it but no use can't connect to the internet..

  • Unable to Telnet...............

    Posted by: vatsey.sharad - Engineer, HCL Comnet
    Jun 6, 2008, 2:09am PST
    Hi,
    I have two IP's Configured on my Cisco 2800. 1.1.1.1 - Loopback and 2.2.2.2 on Fast Ethernet. Both IP's are pingable across the WAN. And telnet to loopback IP is working fine. However I am unable to telnet to Fast Ethernet IP. The error message while trying to telnet to Fast Ethernet IP is: "Could not open connection to the host, on port 23: Connect failed". I tried to debug telnet on the router. The Debug output for unsuccessful telnet is as follows:
    Telnet194: recv SB NAWS 139 24
    However for a successful telnet session, the output is:
    Telnet195: 1 1 251 1
    TCP195: Telnet sent WILL ECHO (1)
    Telnet195: 2 2 251 3
    TCP195: Telnet sent WILL SUPPRESS-GA (3)
    Telnet195: 80000 80000 253 24
    TCP195: Telnet sent DO TTY-TYPE (24)
    Telnet195: 10000000 10000000 253 31
    TCP195: Telnet sent DO WINDOW-SIZE (31)
    TCP195: Telnet received DO ECHO (1)
    TCP195: Telnet received DO SUPPRESS-GA (3)
    TCP195: Telnet received WILL TTY-TYPE (24)
    Telnet195: Sent SB 24 1
    TCP195: Telnet received WILL WINDOW-SIZE (31)
    Telnet195: recv SB NAWS 110 52
    Telnet195: recv SB 24 0 ANSI
    There are no ACL's or firewalls involved in the picture.

    Sharad
    How many forums did you post this question in? I have already found it in 2 other forums.
    HTH
    Rick

  • Fire fox will not open, page says unable to connect. using 7.0.1

    Fire fox will not open, page says unable to connect. using 7.0.1

    Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
    *Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

  • Why am I unable to print using Control P?

    After updating a computer in the office to Windows 7, from XP, I am now unable to print using the Ctrl +P keys. This feature works on the same websites on both the old OS and other computers running Windows 7 in the office. When I try it give me the error message, "Some printing functionality is not currently available". What can I do to fix this?

    You can try to reset print prefs on the <b>about:config</b> page.
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problems_printing_web_pages
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/how-print-websites
    You can open the <b>about:config</b> page via the location/address bar.
    You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/about:config

  • Unable to Telnet / SSH to a particular cisco switch

    Hello,
    I have an unusual issue that I just can't seem to track down.  We have a Windows Server 2008 R2 box that is unable to telnet or ssh to one switch in our network.
    Server IP:  10.0.0.74
    Cisco Switch IP:  10.1.0.7
    I am able to access all other switches/routers on the 10.1.0.x network, but not this one.  I ping and tracert by ip address and name.
    We have a number other servers on our network and they all can access this switch
    Example:  
    a.  10.0.0.73 can telnet/ssh to 10.1.0.7
    b.  10.0.0.72  can telnet/ssh to 10.1.0.7
    c.  10.0.0.50  can telnet/ssh to 10.1.0.7
    d.  My workstation (10.0.250.213) can telnet/ssh to 10.1.0.7
    If anyone can help with troubleshooting further, I would greatly appreciate it.

    Thanks for the reply Philippe!  Here is the route print
    IPv4 Route Table
    ===========================================================================
    Active Routes:
    Network Destination        Netmask          Gateway       Interface  Metric
              0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0         10.0.0.2        10.0.0.74    266
             10.0.0.0      255.255.0.0         On-link         10.0.0.74    266
            10.0.0.74  255.255.255.255         On-link         10.0.0.74    266
         10.0.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link         10.0.0.74    266
            10.10.0.0      255.255.0.0         On-link         10.0.0.74    266
           10.10.0.74  255.255.255.255         On-link         10.0.0.74    266
        10.10.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link         10.0.0.74    266
            127.0.0.0        255.0.0.0         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
            127.0.0.1  255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
      127.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
            224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
            224.0.0.0        240.0.0.0         On-link         10.0.0.74    266
      255.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link         127.0.0.1    306
      255.255.255.255  255.255.255.255         On-link         10.0.0.74    266
    ===========================================================================
    Persistent Routes:
      Network Address          Netmask  Gateway Address  Metric
              0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0         10.0.0.2  Default
    ===========================================================================
    IPv6 Route Table
    ===========================================================================
    Active Routes:
     If Metric Network Destination      Gateway
      1    306 ::1/128                  On-link
      1    306 ff00::/8                 On-link
    ===========================================================================
    Persistent Routes:
      None
    Firewall is disabled and there is no active antivirus.  Im pretty sure port blocking is not the issue.  I am able to ssh and telnet from this box to every other switch/router in our network.
    This server has Solarwinds on it and tracks the health of our network (servers, routers, switches, ups, ect.).  The only reason we noticed an issue is because it stopped backing up the config for this particular switch.  All other switchs/routers
    config is backed up to this server every morning at 2:00AM.  
    With solarwinds, this server is also able to communicate with this switch via snmp / icmp and ping.
    Thanks again for the help!

  • Unable to telnet to localhost after CU5

    Hi
    We upgraded E2013 to CU5 on Sat 13 - On Thu 18 at 9:12 all 4 CAS servers stopped processing mail
    error from smarthost:
    421 4.3.2 The maximum number of concurrent connections has exceeded a limit, closing transmission channel
    unable to telnet locally: telnet localhost 25 
    421 4.3.2 Service not available
    netstat -an | find "25" shows port is listening
    Test-SmtpConnectivity shows success
    Any ideas appreciated
    shapi

    Hi ,
    Please check the below mentioned links 
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/6cb89070-6c17-4f80-8ad1-b4bfff8c8ed6/432-the-maximum-number-of-concurrent-connections-has-exceeded-a-limit-closing-trasmission-channel
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/62ccfbd1-9b1e-4e67-94be-692b725428a3/exchange-cas-array-exceeds-max-number-of-concurrent-connections?forum=exchange2010
    Please reply me if you have any queries.
    Thanks & Regards
    S.Nithyanandham
    Thanks S.Nithyanandham

  • Unable to telnet and tftp to controller

    hello experts!!!
    5508 controller is at the headquarters which can be normally pinged, telnetted, http'd and tftp'ed....
    at the remote site,  controller can be pinged and http'ed but cannot be telnetted and tftp'ed.
    there is a complete tracert from the remote site pc all the way to the controller.
    from a switch at  a remote site, the controller can be telnetted.
    but from a pc on the remote site (which belongs to a remote site vlan), it is unable to telnet and tftp the controller.
    all active components can be telnetted  from the remote site, such as the core switches and routers at the headquearters, except the controller.
    upgraded the controller code to 7.2.xxx in headquarters but still unable to telnet and tftp the controller from remote site.
    is there any more settings on the controller for telnet and tftp?
    what could be the problem why the controller is not available for telnet and tftp from the remote site?
    thank you, experts, in advance for your replies!!!

    Hello, Leo!
    See output of the command:
    (Cisco Controller) >show network summary
    RF-Network Name............................. GID2012
    Web Mode.................................... Enable
    Secure Web Mode............................. Enable
    Secure Web Mode Cipher-Option High.......... Disable
    Secure Web Mode Cipher-Option SSLv2......... Enable
    OCSP........................................ Disabled
    OCSP responder URL..........................
    Secure Shell (ssh).......................... Enable
    Telnet...................................... Enable
    Ethernet Multicast Forwarding............... Disable
    Ethernet Broadcast Forwarding............... Disable
    AP Multicast/Broadcast Mode................. Unicast
    IGMP snooping............................... Disabled
    IGMP timeout................................ 60 seconds
    IGMP Query Interval......................... 20 seconds
    MLD snooping................................ Disabled
    MLD timeout................................. 60 seconds
    MLD query interval.......................... 20 seconds
    User Idle Timeout........................... 28800 seconds
    ARP Idle Timeout............................ 300 seconds
    Cisco AP Default Master..................... Enabled
    --More-- or (q)uit
    AP Join Priority............................ Disable
    Mgmt Via Wireless Interface................. Enable
    Mgmt Via Dynamic Interface.................. Enable
    Bridge MAC filter Config.................... Enable
    Bridge Security Mode........................ EAP
    Mesh Full Sector DFS........................ Enable
    AP Fallback ................................ Enable
    Web Auth Redirect Ports .................... 80
    Web Auth Proxy Redirect  ................... Disable
    Web Auth Captive-Bypass   .................. Disable
    Web Auth Secure Web  ....................... Enable
    Fast SSID Change ........................... Disabled
    AP Discovery - NAT IP Only ................. Enabled
    IP/MAC Addr Binding Check .................. Enabled
    CCX-lite status ............................ Disable
    oeap-600 dual-rlan-ports ................... Disable
    oeap-600 local-network ..................... Enable

  • Unable to telnet or user disconnected

    Hi,
    It seems that every time a client/server application runs extensively on the Sun Solaris 7 server, users who are already connected to the server got disconnected or we're unable to telnet or ping the server (connection got timeout). I increased the pty's to 128 but still no luck. Traffic on the switch seems ok.
    Any idea someone.?
    Pls help
    Rales

    Are you able to console to the access point? Do you have an ACL preventing telnet or HTTP access to the AP? Is there a chance that HTTP and telnet are disabled on the AP?
    Mark

  • Unable to telnet SLM224G2

    hi.
    i am able to ping my SLM224G2 switch but unable to telnet the switch.
    pls. help me out. 
    Jitendra 

    I am not sure if the SLM224G2 if you can telnet the unit but if it does have that option usually you might have some enabled firewalls in the PC that is why you are unable telnet the unit. I tried to further look at either the user guide or datasheet for the SLM224G (anyway the SLM224G2 should belong to that family) and it doesn’t say that it has a telnet capability. I am honestly not familiar with this switch but I know the SRW series has telnet capabilities. I suggest try contacting CISCO tech support to report about this problem and seek their opinion about it.

  • Unable to sync using PocketMac

    Unable to sync using PocketMac

    actually PM should work for you....why do you say it won't?  Also Missing sync is available, but it costs $.
    4.6.1.305 hybrid
    Mac Pro 2X2.8 Quad SL

  • Telnet using TCP vi's

    Labview 7.1
    Windows XP Pro / DOS
    Using the TCP vi's I am able to successfully talk back and forth on port 23 to the labview basic telnet server example found on the ni website (local host)
    I am also able to talk to this labview telnet server example using the DOS command interface . Everything seemed rosey until I tried using the same TCP vi's to look at a real remote system. The DOS command interface works great to access the remote system using Telnet. I get the correct return prompt of
    login:
    When I try to access the remote system with the TCP vi's I get:
     ÿý ÿý ÿý#ÿý'ÿý$
    This return prompt is consistant. Same thing every time. I also found a TCP example on the ni website, and I get exactly the same response. I am reasonably sure the connection is being made based on other factors, just getting junk back. ????
    I am using TCP write and TCP read and TCP open connection
    gtb

    Hi gtb,
    For future reference, this message is attached to the Telnet Server example: "National Instruments has not reviewed this program, does not support
    this program, and does not guarantee its quality in any way." There's no way to tell if this program will work with your application, so I would recommend using it as a reference point and not a standard.
    Stil, I found these two previous posts which discuss this problem:
    garbled response when TCP connect is used with telnet
       http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=137137&requireLogin=False
    Re: How do I establish a telnet session with unit under test?
       http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=112886&query.id=0#M112886
    As discussed in the 2nd post, "If you want to do telnet using plain TCP, you need to do everything yourself, including the telnet options negotiation."
    It appears more efficient to use NI's Telnet VIs, but the 2nd post gives you the necessary information for writing telnet using plain TCP. Cheers.
    Michael K.
    | Michael K | Project Manager | LabVIEW R&D | National Instruments |

Maybe you are looking for