Unacceptable Performance - Unacceptable Point Patch Policy

There are known issues with Flash CS3. Notable of these are
the publish crashes on all platforms. I find it completely
unacceptable that Macromedia > Adobe's perspective on patches is
typically 'a paid upgrade will patch the program'.
This is completely unusual in the industry and the fact that
you now hold the monopoly on good (great tools, but not perfect
tools) is no excuse for not fixing issues with your software. I
find it pretty deplorable that you will fix known issues by
pitching an upgrade. 'Pay to upgrade or live with the issues' is no
way to be.
Flash crashes on me no less than 10 times a day. Most of
these crashes occur at publish time. I save my work often, but even
a 15 minute loss is aggrevating. When Flash locks or crashes,
windows can lock things like the context menu from use - this
requires a restart. So a Flash crash ends up doing these things:
1. Interruption of flow
2. Loss of work
3. Loss of time
This can equate to a momentum loss, time loss, and work loss
of up to an hour. Multiply this by 4 to 10 times a day and you can
only imagine how steamed a developer can get.
I use Vista, but I understand that this issue also occurs on
Mac. I use video editing software, word processing software,
spreadsheets, and other authoring software that doesn't crash. Why
am I expected to live with this until Adobe releases a full point
release?
Can I get an amen from any other developers out there? I'd
love Adobe to be as responsive to developers (IDE users, I've seen
a lot of catering to the more hardcore programmer types that tend
NOT to use the IDE anyway). as they are to the public with Flash
player updates.

You realize, of course, that the "you" referred to in your
post is not Adobe. This is a user-to-user forum. If you're unhappy
with Adobe policy, write to them directly. The likelihood of anyone
from Adobe with any influence reading this forum or this post is
next to null.
That said, as a Flash user since 2000, I'm flabbergasted at
the attitude that Flash is somehow "perfect" upon release and no
bugs exist. I was hoping this policy would change when Adobe bought
Macromedia, since Adobe tends to release a few patches for each of
its major apps as bugs are uncovered.
But alas, no hope. I once cornered one of the leaders of the
Flash development team at an official Macromedia event a couple
years ago and brought this up. He replied that they "need to focus
all their resources on developing the next release." I had to
withhold myself from being really rude in response.

Similar Messages

  • Problem in performing multiple Point-In-Time Database Recovery using RMAN

    Hello Experts,
    I am getting an error while performing database point in time recovery multiple times using RMAN. Details are as follows :-
    Environment:
    Oracle 11g, ASM,
    Database DiskGroups : DG_DATA (Data files), DG_ARCH(Archive logs), DG_REDO(Redo logs Control file).
    Snapshot DiskGroups :
    Snapshot1 (taken at 9 am): SNAP1_DATA, SNAP1_ARCH, +SNAP1_REDO
    Snapshot2 (taken at 10 am): SNAP2_DATA, SNAP2_ARCH, +SNAP2_REDO
    Steps performed for point in time recovery:
    1. Restore control file from snapshot 2.
         RMAN> RESTORE CONTROLFILE from '+SNAP2_REDO/orcl/CONTROLFILE/Current.256.777398261';
    2. For 2nd recovery, reset incarnation of database to snapshot 2 incarnation (Say 2).
    3. Catalog data files from snapshot 1.
    4. Catalog archive logs from snapshot 2.
    5. Perform point in time recovery till given time.
         STARTUP MOUNT;
         RUN {
              SQL "ALTER SESSION SET NLS_DATE_FORMAT = ''dd-mon-yyyy hh24:mi:ss''";
              SET UNTIL TIME "06-mar-2013 09:30:00";
              RESTORE DATABASE;
              RECOVER DATABASE;
              ALTER DATABASE OPEN RESETLOGS;
    Results:
    Recovery 1: At 10.30 am, I performed first point in time recovery till 9:30 am, it was successful. Database incarnation was raised from *2* to *3*.
    Recovery 2: At 11:10 am, I performed another point in time recovery till 9:45 am, while doing it I reset the incarnation of DB to *2*, it failed with following error :-
    Starting recover at 28-FEB-13
    using channel ORA_DISK_1
    starting media recovery
    media recovery failed
    RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
    RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
    RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
    RMAN-03002: failure of recover command at 03/06/2013 11:10:57
    ORA-00283: recovery session canceled due to errors
    RMAN-11003: failure during parse/execution of SQL statement: alter database recover if needed
    start until time 'MAR 06 2013 09:45:00'
    ORA-00283: recovery session canceled due to errors
    ORA-00313: open failed for members of log group 1 of thread 1
    ORA-00312: online log 1 thread 1: '+DG_REDO/orcl/onlinelog/group_1.257.807150859'
    ORA-17503: ksfdopn:2 Failed to open file +DG_REDO/orcl/onlinelog/group_1.257.807150859
    ORA-15012: ASM file '+DG_REDO/orcl/onlinelog/group_1.257.807150859' does not exist
    Doubts:
    1. Why did recovery failed 2nd time, but not 1st time and why is RMAN looking for online redo log group_1.257.807150859 in 2nd recovery ?
    3. I tried restoring control file from AutoBackup, in that case both 1st and 2nd recovery succeeded.
    However for this to work, I always need to keep the AutoBackup feature enabled.
    How reliable is control file AutoBackup ? Is there any alternative to using AutoBackup, can I restore control file from snapshot backup only ?
    4. If I restore control file from AutoBackup, then from what point of time/SCN does RMAN restores the control file ?
    Please help me out in this issue.
    Thanks.

    992748 wrote:
    Hello experts,
    I'm little newbie to RMAN recovery. Please help me in these doubts:
    1. If I have datafiles, archive logs & control files backup, but current online REDO logs are lost, then can I perform incomplete database recovery ?yes, if you have backups of everything else
    2. Till what maximum time/scn can incomplete database recovery be performed ??Assuming the only thing lost is the redo logs, you can recover to the last scn in the last archivelog.
    3. What is role of online REDO logs in incomplete database recovery ? They provide the final redo changes - the ones that have not been written to archivelogs
    Are they required for incomplete recovery ?It depends on how much incomplete recovery you need to do.
    Think of all of your changes as a constant stream of redo information. As a redolog fills, it is copied to archive, then (eventually) reused. over time, your redo stream is in archivelog_1, continuing into archvivelog_2, then to 3, and eventually, when you get to the last archivelog, into the online redo. A recovery will start with the oldest necessary point in the redo stream and continue forward. Whether or not you need the online redo for a PIT recovery depends on how far forward you need to recover.
    But you should take every precaution to prevent loss of online redo logs .. starting with having multiple members in each redo group ... and keeping those multiple members on physically separate disks.

  • Java.lang.NullPointerException Patch Policy Enforcement

    Zenworks 11sp3 on Sles11sp3 x64
    I changed following settings in the Patch Policy Enforcement configuration Page:
    Schedule from Default to Schedule
    Restric Duatation
    schedule type
    patch policy reboot behavior to enabled
    change description text
    When now entering Patch Policy Enforcement the page isn't displayed
    Error Details:
    See the ZENworks Control Center log file (zcc.log) for the full stack trace.
    below my error in zcc.log
    Code:
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:53:02.966] [3024] [ZENServer] [99] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Running AJAX ping for url: http://192.168.102.218:7628/RURunning] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:53:04.902] [3024] [ZENServer] [103] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Unable to ping address 192.168.102.218 on port 7628, message: connect timed out] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:53:07.972] [3024] [ZENServer] [99] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Unable to ping address 192.168.102.218 on port 7628, message: connect timed out] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:53:58.998] [3024] [ZENServer] [10407] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: zenobjects, evictions= 11, new size= 2] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:53:58.999] [3024] [ZENServer] [10407] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: object-infos, evictions= 126, new size= 35] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:54:58.994] [3024] [ZENServer] [10412] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: zenobjects, evictions= 2, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:55:58.978] [3024] [ZENServer] [10422] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: bundle-definitions, evictions= 1, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:56:19.560] [3024] [ZENServer] [74] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Page.java CSRF TOKEN, in the Form:1 ..2a8da40e5ea5a7f6614cc907dc34091e :in the session:2a8da40e5ea5a7f6614cc907dc34091e for the page id:null] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:56:19.562] [3024] [ZENServer] [74] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [>>> Cleaning up session] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:56:19.562] [3024] [ZENServer] [74] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [------------Index.java : session attributes removed---------] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:56:20.516] [3024] [ZENServer] [100] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Form.java CSRF TOKEN:1fdd1faa37a731ee1ede3c79785479d8 for the PageId:gettingStarted] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:56:26.658] [3024] [ZENServer] [100] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Form.java CSRF TOKEN:1fdd1faa37a731ee1ede3c79785479d8 for the PageId:configuration] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:56:58.995] [3024] [ZENServer] [10454] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: object-releaseUID, evictions= 1, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:56:58.995] [3024] [ZENServer] [10454] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: zenobjects, evictions= 31, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:56:58.995] [3024] [ZENServer] [10454] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: versionToGUIDMapForACO, evictions= 1, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:57:03.698] [3024] [ZENServer] [106] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Page.java CSRF TOKEN, in the Form:1 ..1fdd1faa37a731ee1ede3c79785479d8 :in the session:1fdd1faa37a731ee1ede3c79785479d8 for the page id:configuration] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:57:03.775] [3024] [ZENServer] [80] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [java.lang.NullPointerException
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.controls.reboot.PatchReboot.GetXMLElementFromString(PatchReboot.java:670)
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.controls.reboot.PatchReboot.getDataFromXml(PatchReboot.java:647)
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.controls.reboot.PatchReboot.setDataFromXml(PatchReboot.java:626)
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.pages.vulnerability.policy.PatchPolicyEnforcementReboot.onLoadSettings(PatchPolicyEnforcementReboot.java:56)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.layout.SettingsPluginTemplate.fireOnLoadEvent(SettingsPluginTemplate.java:454)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.layout.SettingsPluginTemplate.loadContent(SettingsPluginTemplate.java:165)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.layout.PluginTemplate.onLoad(PluginTemplate.java:130)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2423)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.Page.internalProcessRequest(Page.java:723)
    at com.novell.web.controls.Page.processRequest(Page.java:678)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.layout.Index.processRequest(Index.java:689)
    at com.novell.web.internal.controls.PageTag.doEndTag(PageTag.java:86)
    at org.apache.jsp.jsp.index_jsp._jspService(index_jsp.java:399)
    at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:70)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:728)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:432)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:390)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:334)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:728)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:305)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:749)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationDispatcher.java:487)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:379)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:339)
    at com.novell.web.NJWCServlet.serviceImpl(NJWCServlet.java:97)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.ZENworksServlet.service(ZENworksServlet.java:87)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:728)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:305)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.pages.vulnerability.session.HibernateSessionFilter.doFilter(HibernateSessionFilter.java:75)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:243)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:222)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:123)
    at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:581)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:171)
    at com.googlecode.psiprobe.Tomcat70AgentValve.invoke(Tomcat70AgentValve.java:39)
    at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:99)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)
    at com.novell.zenworks.tomcat.ZENRequestValve.invoke(ZENRequestValve.java:1331)
    at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:408)
    at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1009)
    at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:589)
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:312)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
    ] [null] [] [java.lang.NullPointerException] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:57:03.866] [3024] [ZENServer] [80] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [java.lang.NullPointerException
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.controls.reboot.PatchReboot.GetXMLElementFromString(PatchReboot.java:670)
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.controls.reboot.PatchReboot.getDataFromXml(PatchReboot.java:647)
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.controls.reboot.PatchReboot.setDataFromXml(PatchReboot.java:626)
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.pages.vulnerability.policy.PatchPolicyEnforcementReboot.onLoadSettings(PatchPolicyEnforcementReboot.java:56)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.layout.SettingsPluginTemplate.fireOnLoadEvent(SettingsPluginTemplate.java:454)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.layout.SettingsPluginTemplate.loadContent(SettingsPluginTemplate.java:165)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.layout.PluginTemplate.onLoad(PluginTemplate.java:130)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2423)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.WebControl.loadRecursive(WebControl.java:2429)
    at com.novell.web.controls.Page.internalProcessRequest(Page.java:723)
    at com.novell.web.controls.Page.processRequest(Page.java:678)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.layout.Index.processRequest(Index.java:689)
    at com.novell.web.internal.controls.PageTag.doEndTag(PageTag.java:86)
    at org.apache.jsp.jsp.index_jsp._jspService(index_jsp.java:399)
    at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:70)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:728)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:432)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:390)
    at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:334)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:728)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:305)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:749)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationDispatcher.java:487)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:379)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:339)
    at com.novell.web.NJWCServlet.serviceImpl(NJWCServlet.java:97)
    at com.novell.zenworks.fw.web.internal.ZENworksServlet.service(ZENworksServlet.java:87)
    at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:728)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:305)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
    at com.patchlink.sapphire.web.pages.vulnerability.session.HibernateSessionFilter.doFilter(HibernateSessionFilter.java:75)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:243)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:222)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:123)
    at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:581)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:171)
    at com.googlecode.psiprobe.Tomcat70AgentValve.invoke(Tomcat70AgentValve.java:39)
    at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:99)
    at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)
    at com.novell.zenworks.tomcat.ZENRequestValve.invoke(ZENRequestValve.java:1331)
    at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:408)
    at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1009)
    at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:589)
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:312)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
    ] [null] [] [java.lang.NullPointerException] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:57:03.867] [3024] [ZENServer] [80] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Form.java CSRF TOKEN:757a9c6701c05387fe9c934a20226cd2 for the PageId:errorPage] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:57:59.0] [3024] [ZENServer] [10467] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: logged.in.info, evictions= 1, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:57:59.0] [3024] [ZENServer] [10467] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: external.references, evictions= 3, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:57:59.0] [3024] [ZENServer] [10467] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: object-releaseUID, evictions= 1, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:57:59.0] [3024] [ZENServer] [10467] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: zenobjects, evictions= 24, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:57:59.1] [3024] [ZENServer] [10467] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Cache: versionToGUIDMapForACO, evictions= 1, new size= 0] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:05.398] [3024] [ZENServer] [106] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Checking Request value for isServer: false] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:05.398] [3024] [ZENServer] [106] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Checking Request value for ipAddresses: 192.168.102.218] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:05.398] [3024] [ZENServer] [106] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Checking Request value for dnsAddresses: WCACMP478.wthg.at] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:05.399] [3024] [ZENServer] [106] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Checking Request value for portString: 7628] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:05.399] [3024] [ZENServer] [106] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Running AJAX ping for url: http://192.168.102.218:7628/RURunning] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:10.405] [3024] [ZENServer] [106] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Unable to ping address 192.168.102.218 on port 7628, message: connect timed out] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:17.18] [3024] [ZENServer] [106] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Page.java CSRF TOKEN, in the Form:1 ..9675125fda317dd86c2769ada5348d03 :in the session:9675125fda317dd86c2769ada5348d03 for the page id:home] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:21.542] [3024] [ZENServer] [77] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Sending AJAX request to '192.168.102.218' (WCACMP478.wthg.at)] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:21.542] [3024] [ZENServer] [77] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Params for DeviceHeathDescription AJAX call: addressList=192.168.102.218&dnsList=WCACMP478.wthg.at&isServer=false&userName=2c2f7bf3e3d55d4f8575b4df78d938a7&password=null&port=7628] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:21.733] [3024] [ZENServer] [77] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Form.java CSRF TOKEN:9675125fda317dd86c2769ada5348d03 for the PageId:workstationDetails] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:22.214] [3024] [ZENServer] [82] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Checking Request value for isServer: false] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:22.214] [3024] [ZENServer] [82] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Checking Request value for ipAddresses: 192.168.102.218] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:22.214] [3024] [ZENServer] [82] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Checking Request value for dnsAddresses: WCACMP478.wthg.at] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:22.214] [3024] [ZENServer] [82] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Checking Request value for portString: 7628] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [03/27/2014 09:58:22.215] [3024] [ZENServer] [82] [zenworks] [ZCC] [] [Running AJAX ping for url: http://192.168.102.218:7628/RURunning] [] [] [] [ZENServer]
    [DEBUG] [0
    regards Andreas

    Andreas,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://www.novell.com/support and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com

  • Debugging skips a PERFORM command pointing to an implicit program

    Hi Gurus
    Can anyone tell me why does the debug skips a PERFORM command pointing to an implicit program, (such as in the following line of code)?
    PERFORM SPEZIAL_DD_RANGES_AENDERN IN PROGRAM (LIS_PROGNAME) IF FOUND.
    In fact, when debugging the main program, the runtime environment will not point to LIS_PROGNAME even if the program is found (which is the case). Instead it will skip it.
    Thanks
    Nuno Natividade

    If the program in the variable LIS_PROGNAME is the system program, than you have to do the SYSTEM debugging.
    Put a breakpoint on the PREFORM
    In the debugging start the System Debugging by:
    Settings > System Debugging
    Now, do single Step (F5).
    Regards,
    Naimesh Patel

  • Performance improvement  from patching/upgrading wl 5.1

    Hi,
    We have started looking at a lot of issues that are currently affecting the performance of our web site. One thing that has been proposed as a potential area for improvement would be to patch/upgrade our weblogic servers.
    We are currently running 5.1 patched at level 4 on hpux.
    I was wondering if anybody could provide some info or point me to some documentation that would confim any actual gains we might get by patching our servers or upgrading them to 6.1
    Thanks,
    Karl

    Hi Karl,
    "Karl Raphael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:3f4d6858$[email protected]..
    We have started looking at a lot of issues that are currently affectingthe performance of our web site. One thing that has been proposed as a
    potential area for improvement would be to patch/upgrade our weblogic
    servers.
    >
    We are currently running 5.1 patched at level 4 on hpux.
    I was wondering if anybody could provide some info or point me to somedocumentation that would confim any actual gains we might get by patching
    our servers or upgrading them to 6.1
    You should definitely consider upgrading to the newest 8.1.
    It offers a lot of performance improvements, including normal
    connection pools and prepared statement caches, CMP batching
    and many others. There is no reason for upgrading to 6.1
    when 8.1 is out.
    If such a long jump is not an option, at least you may upgrade
    to the latest SP for 5.1 - you will get caching for prepared
    statetements - if your app is database-bound, it will definitely
    give a boost.
    Regards,
    Slava Imeshev

  • Acoount to perform SQL2005 sp patch upgrade.

    Hello,
    I would like to know which I account I should logon to perform a SQL2005 SP2 patch upgrade for a standard SAP system, should it be local administrator account or <SID>adm account???? Please advice.
    When I perform a SQL2000 to SQL2005 upgrade task for a standard SAP system, I logon on as local administrator account to perform this task, so I would assume it would be a local administrator account.
    Best regards,
    Phuong.

    Hello Phuong,
    As long as any of those two accounts (<sidadm> or Local Admin - Administrator) have System Admin - "sa" privileges in the SQL Server, you will be able to patch the SQL Server.
    If your SQL DBA follows the best practices for SQL Server, he should have removed the Local Administrator user from the SQL Server System Admins ("sa") group....thus your Local Administrator user wouldn't work.
    However, I am assuming that you are the DBA in this case and unless you intentionally removed the Local Administrator user from the SQL "sa" group, by default, the Local Administrator account is in the SQL "sa" group....and you can use that for patching.
    Please award points if this answered your question.
    Thanks.

  • [Forum FAQ] The Value drop down list is grayed out when you perform search for Group Policy Objects in GPMC

    Symptom
    On Windows Server 2012 or Windows Server 2012 R2, when you use the Search for Group Policy Objects feature in GPMC, the “Value” field is not populated when you choose “User Configuration” as the Search Item. (See Figure 1.)
    <Figure 1>
    Cause
    The happens because the  Data of the (Default) value of the following Registry Key is not correct.
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions\{4D2F9B6F-1E52-4711-A382-6A8B1A003DE6}]
    By default the Data is (value not set). (see Figure 2)
    <Figure 2>
    Resolution
    The registry keys under [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions] are the Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions. The CSE name of the GUID {4D2F9B6F-1E52-4711-A382-6A8B1A003DE6} is
    RemoteApp and Desktop Connections. Please follow the steps below to resolve the issue.
    1. Locate the registry key: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions\{4D2F9B6F-1E52-4711-A382-6A8B1A003DE6}]
    2. Take the ownership of this key: Right click on the registry key and choose Permissions option and click the Advanced button on the dialogue window. Then on the Advanced Security Settings dialogue window, click Change button to take the ownership
    of the key for the current logon account and make the current logon account Full Control permission with the registry key. (See Figure 3.)
    <Figure 3> 
    3. Change the data of (Default) value from "(value not set)" to
    "RemoteApp and Desktop Connection Component". (See Figure 4)
    <Figure 4>
    4. Once the steps above are completed, the Value drop down list will be populated again when you perform Search in GPMC. (See Figure 5)
    <figure 5>
    This article has been created as a TechNet Wiki
    here.
    Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

    thanks for the tip - but you should create this as a wiki article as it will be easier to reference in the future
    Regards,
    Denis Cooper
    MCITP EA - MCT
    Help keep the forums tidy, if this has helped please mark it as an answer
    My Blog
    LinkedIn:

  • Software Installers vs Patch Policy

    Hi,
    I'm new to ZPM so please bear with me if this is a silly question.
    I am creating patch policies for the critical, recommended and informational impacts and I am wondering why the Software Installers impact is nowhere to be found in the filter options. I also tried <> from those 3 impacts, which did nothing.
    Considering there are both actual applications and things like Windows Malicious Software Removal tool in software installers, then it would be useful to be able to have a policy that filters by those I think. But that may simply be that I am unsure of how that impact should be used.
    Could someone kindly enlighten me please.
    Thanks
    Peter

    Post the SR here as well so we can follow.
    On 11/10/2014 4:36 AM, plsm5882 wrote:
    >
    > Will do. Thanks.
    >
    >
    Going to Brainshare 2014?
    http://www.brainshare.com
    Use Registration Code "nvlcwilson" for $300 off!
    Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
    Novell Technical Support Engineer
    Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
    Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
    These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

  • Patch Policy for EBS

    Does anyone have a comprehensive list of all technology that requires security patching in the oracle EBS and supporting infrastructure?
    I'd prefer comments as opposed to endless links. And possibly if you could provide a split of what Oracle will patch in the technology stack, and what it doesnt, i.e. what requires 3rd party patching?
    I am pretty sure our web servers run apache, does oracle EBS only run on certain supported versions of web services?

    Hi;
    Does anyone have a comprehensive list of all technology that requires security patching in the oracle EBS and supporting infrastructure?You can follow Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts quartly
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alerts-086861.html
    I'd prefer comments as opposed to endless links. And possibly if you could provide a split of what Oracle will patch in the technology stack, and what it doesnt, i.e. what requires 3rd party patching?If you mean OS patch than you can apply those patch, but if its prod than i suggest Rise SR for make clear your issue wiht oracle support
    I am pretty sure our web servers run apache, does oracle EBS only run on certain supported versions of web services?EBS work wiht Apache. Check concept guide
    For r12.1.1:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B53825_01/current/html/docset.html
    Regard
    Helios

  • MARS slow performance after latest patch?

    I just moved our small MARS 50 to 4.3.2 and we're still crawling. The GUI is ungodly slow, is anyone else still having this issue? I saw a lot of complaints of MARS in regards to the 4.3.1 code, I'm not seeing much an improvement to 4.3.2.
    Anyone else relate or have advice for me other than frequest reboots?

    In our case, it was some bug with NAT sessionization. We have Checkpoint devices, but I'm not sure if it's limited to CP or any NAT device. Turning NAT sessionization off really boosted performance. Our pnparser CPU utilization went from >70% to <30%. It's a per device DB setting, so Cisco has to do it.

  • Performing Exchange Server patching & service pack for mailbox server without losing some data during the rollback ?

    People,
    I'd like to know how can I safely apply the Exchange Server service pack or cumulative update to the Mailbox Server role (no DAG) without losing some email during the downtime and rolling back the snapshot ?
    Can I do the following:
    1. Stop all of the Exchange Server services.
    2. Disconnect the vNIC in Mailbox server
    3. Take VM snapshot
    4. Apply the Exchange Server service Pack / Cumulative Update or Windows Update
    5. Reboot
    6. Reconnect the vNIC, if the server back online again with no issue, commit / delete the snapshot, if not, then disconnect the vNIC followed by roll back.
    would that be make sense or supported from both Vmware and Microsoft http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/exchange-2010-on-vmware-support-and-licensing-guide.pdf ?
    If yu have any other suggestion, please let me know here.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hey AlbertWT,
    I'll start off by saying that I wouldn't do it.  Microsoft is explicit that snapshots are not supported with Exchange when virtualized.  See below (from Exchange 2013 virtualization: Exchange 2013 Help):
    Some hypervisors include features for taking snapshots of virtual machines. Virtual machine snapshots capture the state of a virtual machine while it's running. This feature enables you to take multiple snapshots of a virtual machine and then revert the virtual machine to any of the previous states by applying a snapshot to the virtual machine. However, virtual machine snapshots aren't application aware, and using them can have unintended and unexpected consequences for a server application that maintains state data, such as Exchange. As a result, making virtual machine snapshots of an Exchange guest virtual machine isn't supported.
    Even if we ignore the support statement on snapshots this is still not a good idea.  Here are some things to consider.
    1) Cumulative updates for Exchange make changes to the Active Directory Schema.  Rolling back the snapshot on the Mailbox server will not roll back the changes to AD, which could cause functional and supportability issues.  See this link to give you an idea of how there are AD schema updates in every Exchange CU and service pack: Exchange 2013 Active Directory schema changes: Exchange 2013 Help
    2) It is possible for email to come in during the time that you're testing the update, and if you need to roll back you would need a plan to get that email back.  Third party services could work, or you could prevent email from coming into your environment completely during that time, but those are not ideal solutions.
    A far better solution would be to create a lab environment that is isolated from production.  You could either take clones of your Exchange and AD VMs and put them into a network fenced environment, or create a lab and import your AD structure so it matches production.  I think this is a far better way to test than trying to rely on snapshots in production.
    Hope that helps!
    Matt

  • Is Using Static functions advisable from performance(speed) point of view

    I was wondering if using a static function would be slower than using a normal function, especially when the function is to be accessed by multiple threads since the same memory area is used each time the static function is accessed from any of the threads. Thus is it right if I say that static functions are not suitable for multiThreaded access ?

    I was wondering if using a static function would be
    slower than using a normal function,Static functions are linked at compile time, while normal functions have to be linked based on the runtime type of the object they are called on. This lookup means that static function invocations are likely to be faster.
    especially when
    the function is to be accessed by multiple threads
    since the same memory area is used each time the
    static function is accessed from any of the threads.If you are talking about the code segment, where the function definition is held, there is only a single copy of each "normal" function as well. The code segment is also read-only, so there are no issues with multiple threads reading and executing the same code at the same time.
    There are the normal issues with multi-threaded access to variables in static functions that exist with normal functions.
    Thus is it right if I say that static functions are
    not suitable for multiThreaded access ?Static functions are no safer than non-static functions in terms of thread safety. On the other hand, it is no more dangerous having multiple threads calling a static function than having multiple threads calling a non-static function on the same object. Exactly the same thread safety techniques apply whether you are working in a static or a non-static context.
    With the above in mind, there is a great deal of design difference between static functions and non-static functions. They mean very different things when creating a system, and an operation that is suited for a static function is very likely not appropriate in a non-static context, and vice versa. The important thing is to make sure the design is appropriate for what the system is trying to do.
    The most common use of static functions is for object creation... The Factory design pattern uses static methods to create objects of a given type, the Singleton design pattern uses static methods to allow access to itself.

  • Point-in-polygon performance  -large polygon w many vertices

    Dear Everybody,
    I was experimenting with the performance of point-in-polygon queries for very different polygon layers. My experience was that queries can be extreme slow, if the polygons are large and have many vertices (e.g., the administrative boundary of a state).
    I could also explain, why this is so:
    *because of the large area, geographic indices do not help: after the first filtering step (the filtering on the basis of the indices) the immediate result  is still very large, and
    * the large number of potential hits after the first filtering step have to be processed in a - due to the many vertices - very processor intensive second filtering step.
    That is, there are two causes making the second filtering step very expensive.
    Could you please comment on this? Does anybody have any experiences?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Gergely,
    Thanks for your suggestion, I am thinking about that too. But the polygon I am using is dynamically built by user when they use the application. They choose some lines, and then I build a buffer around those lines based on some parameters user input, and it could get complicated since it varies all the time. I was thinking maybe there is a parameter in sdo_buffer function, which should allow to reduce the number of vertices used to build the buffer polygon? kind of stumped in this problem. maybe I should open a TAR to request better solution. A query which sometimes takes a hour to finish is obviously not acceptable, although it is not always the case. :-(
    Tim

  • Easiest way to get patches

    A couple of years ago we started using Solaris 11/06. We were able to fairly easily setup smpatch and perform the patches. For a while it worked beautifully.
    Now, everytime we setup a new server, the patching seems to be harder to implement. Right now I am again unable to get patches via smpatch, and I quite honestly frustrated beyond belief. I can't even register the system at this point, and I'm using credentials that are being used by our other systems that do manage to work correctly.
    I've spent hours manually adding patches and packages, restarting different services, trying to register with sconadm again and again, logging in to sunsolve.sun.com to approve a new agreement with oracle, checking java versions, checking to make sure different packages are installed, only to have it fail again, this time with a more obscure message. I tried pca. It won't download anything. Everything comes back 403. I again checked the credentials. They still match other servers currently able to receive patches.
    What is the easiest way to get patches to a Solaris 10 11/06 server without having to spend hours manually resolving dependencies (which I thought smpatch was supposed to solve but doesn't appear to work reliably).
    I just need something I can run that will figure out what is on the server, what it needs, and then download and install them.

    Boingo wrote:
    I tried pca. It won't download anything. Everything comes back 403. I again checked the credentials. They still match other servers currently able to receive patches.403 means that SunSolve thinks that your Sun Online Account is not connected to a support contract (which is required to download any patch after a recent change in Oracle's patch policy for Solaris). It has happened in the past that SunSolve "forgets" about connected contracts, but I've never received a report that pca works on one system and returns 403's on another when the same SOA is used.
    Anyway - this isn't the forum for PCA, I recommend subscribing to its mailing list if you want follow this route further.
    Martin.

  • OPA Performance

    Hi,
    In one of the OPA Performance white paper published, there is point about impact of policy model size on the performance. Below is the excerpt
    Oracle Policy Automation enforces a modeling style that ensures every policy model can be
    quickly and consistently processed, regardless of what data is used. In this approach, there is
    no iteration or “rule-firing” cycle that takes place – a single pass through the rules is always
    sufficient to know what decisions can be reached. This ensures that the impact is minimized of
    increases in policy model size and complexity, and eliminates the need to go through a policy
    modeling optimization process prior to deployment. Because the rules are effectively always
    optimized, the result is faster processing, for every model size and complexity
    Does that mean:-
    1) OPA performance is independent of policy model size - number of rules and their complexity?
    2) What do they mean when they talk about single pass which is required for decisions?
    URL :- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/apps-tech/policy-automation/learnmore/oracle.pdf
    Thx
    Dos

    1) Performance is not independent of policy model size: more rules certainly require more time to process. However, due to the way the rules are held in memory, and because most policy models have a wide branching structure of logical dependencies, processing a decision using a policy model that is 10 times larger will often only take 1.1 times longer, for example. That is: processing time only increases logarithmically with the number of rules and conditions.
    2) Many rule engines use an iterative model where effectively each condition keeps on being fired until no more information can be generated. OPA takes a different approach where the rules are all laid out in the sequence dictated by the logic, and processed rapidly in order. Depending on the data being processed, rules can obviously be fired more than once - but the same rule never needs to be calculated more than once on the same data (and cannot contradict itself as new information arises) - so there is no "truth maintenance" cycle involved.
    Davin.

Maybe you are looking for