Unicode conversion plan and estimate

Hi,
Can anyone who have gone through a UNICODE conversion provide a high level plan and timeline that was spent converting the system to unicode. We need an estimate of the conversion effort (not incl. an upgrade). The system is ECC 5.0
Thanks,
Prashanth

Hii
check this link
<b>Re: Preparing for upgrade and Unicode conversion while on 4.6c
Regards
Naresh

Similar Messages

Problem with field-symbols in UNICODE conversion

Hi all.
I'm in a UNICODE conversion project and I have a problem with a program that uses field-symbols.
DATA: BEGIN OF wa_data_aux,
        mandt LIKE zindices-mandt,
        kschl LIKE zindices-kschl,
        datab LIKE zindices-datab,
        valor LIKE zindices-valor,
        descripcion LIKE zindices-descripcion,
        ernam LIKE zindices-ernam,
        erdat LIKE zindices-erdat,
        waers LIKE zindices-waers,
      END OF wa_data_aux.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
               <fs2> TYPE ANY,
               <fs3> LIKE wa_data_aux.
          <fs2> = <fs3>.
This assignment results in a DUMP.
Can anybody help me to solve this problem?
Thanks!!

TYPES: BEGIN OF wa_data_aux,
          mandt TYPE mandt,
          kschl TYPE kschl,
          erdat TYPE d,
          waers TYPE waers,
      END OF wa_data_aux.
DATA: w_aux TYPE wa_data_aux.
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
<fs2> TYPE ANY,
<fs3> TYPE wa_data_aux.
w_aux-mandt = '300'.
ASSIGN w_aux TO <fs3>.
ASSIGN <fs3> TO <fs2>.
WRITE : / <fs2>.
GBY.

MDMP unicode conversion - Vocabulary maintenace

Hello,
W have upgraded 4.5B MDMP system to ECC4 EHP4 and now we are in process of unicode conversion.
please advice on as specified below.
In SPUMG Scan process, we have completed the following scans:
a) Tables without language Info
b) Tables with Ambiguous language Info
c) Indx Analysis
For maintaining vocabulary we have implemented notes 756534 & 756535, 871541. and Tables with language are also scanned. While handling vocabulary the system has displays 539158 with duplicates and 189314 when duplicates are discarded, which doesnot assigened any languages. We have 9 acive languages.
As per Unicode conversion document i left out with only 2 more option a) HInt management b) Manual assignment
How to handle this? is this a normal situation or any correction can be done?
Thanks and Regards
Vinay

Hi Vinay,
This Thread belongs to the Unicode forum:
Internationalization and Unicode
In my opinion one of the best and most efficient possibility to reduce the number of words
is to make use of hints. Please follow the Unicode Conversion Guide and SAP note 1034188.
Application colleagues should be contacted in order to find proper hints.
Please also note that report umg_vocabulary_statistic or um4_vocabulary_statistic is the best tool to evaluate tables for hint processing.
And the rest of the vocab, which can not be assigned by the hints method or by the SAP notes you mentioned, need to be assigned by native speakers (manual effort !).
As you can see, SPUMG is NOT just a tool to be executed by Basis staff.
It needs in deed collaboration between Basis, Application and native speakers.
And it should be clear that the duration of the scans can be quite high - therefore a trial & error approach will take time (especially for large systems).
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel
SAP AG

MDMP: TWIN Upgrade + Unicode conversion

Hello ,
We have adopted twin upgrade and unicode conversion method and at present we are converting the twin system to unicode conversion.
In Twin system we have completed SPUMG 7 scans. Whether i need to run UMG_TWIN_CREATE_TRANSPORT now to save the results for twin preparation run or i need to perform this step after Additional preparatory step.
Kindly suggest
Regards
Vinay

Hi Vinay,
Excerpt from the UCG:
2.4 Final Preparation Steps
2.4.1 SPUMG Updates
If there is a time difference between the scan and the database export, it may happen that a new table has been created or a Support Package has brought a new table with it. In such a case, the preconversion must be rerun right before the export is carried out to ensure that the data change is reflected in the Export Control Table.
End excerpt
Hence this step is necessary in case of DB changes (e.g. new tables with or without content).
Therefore if you have significant changes, I would recommend to create the twin transport after this step.
However this step has to be repeated in the PRD system as well (see TU&UC-Guide) to reflect the changes between Twin and PRD system. In order to minimize downtime, the differences between the two systems should be small.
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel
SAP AG

SCM Unicode Conversion - Initialize LC or not??

We have recently upgraded our non unicode SCM 5.0 systems to SCM7 EhP3 and we now want to convert these systems to Unicode.
We will be running most of the unicode conversions in situ, ie run all the unicode conversion steps and /SAPAPO/OM_LC_DOWNLOAD_UPLOAD (A&B) , export the database, drop the original non unicode system, reinstall a unicode SCM system and then import the database, followed by /SAPAPO/OM_LC_DOWNLOAD_UPLOAD (C) etc..
On one of the servers however we have 2 SCM systems installed and will use the unicode conversion to move one of the SCM systems to a new server during the database export/import phase, so finally down to my questions!
1) For the in situ Unicode conversions, I take it that we DO NOT have to initialize LC when reinstalling the Unicode SCM system and that we can use param_put DEFAULT_CODE Unicode and alter user SAP<SID> DEFAULTCODE UNICODE before running Step C of /SAPAPO/OM_LC_DOWNLOAD_UPLOAD?
2) For the Unicode conversion including the database export/import (homogenous system copy) to the new server, do we have to initalize livecache as part of the SCM install?
Regards,
Mark

Hi Mark,
Please cehck below thread,
Restore backup of a Non Unicode to a Unicode Live Cache
1319517 - Unicode Collection Note
BR
AKJ

Unicode conversion vs. UTF8

I currently run a dual stack ECC system with no languages installed (other than default EN/DE).
SQL> select value from v$nls_parameters
2     where parameter = 'NLS_CHARACTERSET';
VALUE
WE8DEC
Is there any reason I need to change the characterset to UTF8?
Can I change to UTF8 without doing a full blown SAP unicode conversion? and Why - if ever - would I have to perform a unicode conversion?

I currently run a dual stack ECC system with no languages installed (other than default EN/DE).
SQL> select value from v$nls_parameters
2     where parameter = 'NLS_CHARACTERSET';
VALUE
WE8DEC
Is there any reason I need to change the characterset to UTF8?
Can I change to UTF8 without doing a full blown SAP unicode conversion? and Why - if ever - would I have to perform a unicode conversion?
Further info:
SQL> select property_value from database_properties
2       where upper(property_name) = 'NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET';
PROPERTY_VALUE
UTF8
SQL> select value from v$nls_parameters
2       where upper(parameter) = 'NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET';
VALUE
UTF8
SQL> select value from v$nls_parameters
2     where parameter = 'NLS_CHARACTERSET';
VALUE
WE8DEC
Does the above mean I never have to do a unicode conversion? Under which sceanrio would I have to?

How to estimate the time needed for unicode conversion

Experts:
I am going to perform an upgrade from 46C (non-unicode) to ECC6/EHP4.
In the action plan , it's hard to estimate the time needed for unicode conversion.
We do not have a sandbox to benchmark that time.
Could you please help share your experience here?
Thanks!!

Hi,
usually it is very hard to estimate a proper time.
There are some hints to get a rough feeling (SAP note 857081 and [SMP link|http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000380759&_OBJECT=011000358700001279022010E] ).
However please note that SAP highly recommends to do a Sandbox conversion - otherwise there is a high risk that the PRD conversion will take (much) longer than expected.
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel

Effort estimate (ABAP) during Unicode Conversion project

Hi ,
I am working on a CU&UC (Combined Upgrade and Unicode Conversion) project from 46C to ECC6.
We are having 8 different codepages (MDMP SYSTEM) and around 10000 custom objects.
Does anyone have any experince in doing such kind of project ? I am looking at the effort estimate on technical side (ABAP) and functional side.
Any inputs of Technical effort in such a project with related number of codepages and custom objects will be useful (in man days & project duration).
Thanks
Dilip

Hi Dilip,
the main effort from ABAP side seems to be testing of the new system and creating the Unicode vocabulary. You need test teams and test plans for all locations and for the vocabulary you need people for all your languages. ABAP coding itself is probably not your biggest problem. You have to switch your system to unicode and then check all your sources. This could be done by a report or transaction (check the documentation regarding the Migration). From my point of view this is the main effort you'll have, testing and building the vocabulary. How big this effort is depends on your system. I think six month are a good time frame for the whole project (I assume you migrate a landscape of 3 systems). Because I'm working in the Basis administration I could not tell you the exact man days, but I would estimate up to two weeks for the vocabulary per language. You should have the numbers for the system tests from previous upgrades.
The technical migration effort depends on your hardware and time requirements. If your system is big (TBytes) and your downtime is very limited it could be necessary to tune the migration by testing it several times. If your requirements are not that high, then a single test migration could be sufficient. I've done two bigger migrations with 2.5 and 3.5 TB in less than 24 hours but therefore you have to have fast hardware and you have to tune your process well. If you have a single huge table this could destroy all efforts reaching your time target, if for example the index build could not be done in less then your time target. If you have enough hardware resources and time to tune your migration you could reach almost any time (which makes sense - some hours).
Best regards
Ralph Ganszky

Combined Upgrade and Unicode conversion of Sap 4.6C to ECC6.0

Hello all,
my project team intends to carry out a combined upgrade and unicode conversion of an SAP ERP 4.6C system with MDMP to ECC6.0 (no enhancement package). The system is running on Oracle 10.2.
In preparation for this upgrade, I have gone through the SAP notes 928729, 54801.
We need to get a rough estimate of the entire downtime so as to alert our end users. From the CU&UC documentation in 928729, I read up note 857081. However the program in this note cannot be used to estimate the downtime as my system is < SAP netweaver 6.20.
Is there any other SAP note or tool or program that I can use to estimate the downtime for the entire CU&UC? Thanks a lot!

Hi,
Combined upgrade depend upon number of factors like database size, resources on the server and optimization. In order to get idea of how much downtime, it will take, I would suggest you to do combined upgrade and unicode conversion on sandbox system which should be the replica of your production system. And try to optimize it. From there you can get approx. downtime required.
Also, please read combined upgrade and unicode conversion guides on http://service.sap.com/unicode@sap
Thanks
Sunny

4.7EEx1.10 to ECC6.0 upgrade and Unicode conversion

Hi Experts,
We are going to initiate the upgrade from next month onwards. Subsequently i have started preparing the plan and strategy for the same.
As our current setup is 4.7EEx110/Win 2003 R2-64 bit/Oracle 10.2.0.4.0 (Non unicode). And we have recently migrated on to this setup from WIn2k 32 bit. Also the current hardware is Unicode compatible.
With respect to strategy for achieving this Upgrade and Unicode conversion, i am planning as follows.
Step 1) Perform Unicode conversion on the current landscape (Both Export/import on the same servers)
Step 2) Setup Temporary landscape as part of Dual maintenance strategy and migrate data from the current systems to temporary systems using backup/restore method.
Step 3) Perform the SAP version upgrade on the current landscape and setup transport routes from temporary to current landscape in order to keep it in sync
Step 4) after successful upgrade, decommission the temporary landscape
Please provide your suggestions and valuable advices if there is anything wrong with my strategy and execution plan.
Regards,
Dheeraj

Hi,
Thanks. As i have already referred these notes as i am seeking advise with respect to my upgrade approach.
However i have planned to perform in the following manner.
1) Refresh Sandbox with Prod data and perform Upgrade to ECC6.0 EHP5 & subsequently Unicode conversion on the same server (Since both export & Import has to perform on the same hardware as we have recently migrated on this hardware which is Unicode compatible)
2) Setup temporary landscape for DEv & QAs and establish transport connection to Production system in order to move urgent changes
3) Keep a track of the changes which have transported during upgrade phase so that the same can be implemented in the upgraded systems i.e. Dev & QAS
4) After Sandbox Migration and signoff, we will perform Dev & QAS upgrade & unicode conversion on the same hardware (Note: Since these are running on VMware can we export the data from the upgraded system and import on to a new VM?)
5) Plan for production cutover and Upgrade the Prod system to ECC6.0 Ehp5 and then Unicode conversion. As i am planning to perform upgrade over the weekend and then Unicode conversion activity in the next weekend (Is it a right way?)
My Production setup: DB on one Physical host and CI on separate Virtual host
6) After the stabilization phase, we are planning for OS & DB upgrade as follows:
a) Windows upgrade from 2003 R2 to Windows 2008 R2
b) Oracle Upgrade from 10.2 to 11.2
If anyone thinks that there is anything wrong with my above approach and need changes then please revert.
I have one more doubt as I am going to upgrade 4.7EEx110 (WAS 620, Basis SP64) to ECC6.0 EHp5.As I presume that I can straight away upgrade from the current version to ECC6.0 Ehp5 without installing EHP. Kindly confirm
Thanks

Combined upgrade and Unicode conversion for ECC5 MDMP system

Hello,
We are planning to do Upgrade and Unicode conversion of ECC5 MDMP system to ECC6 EHP4 Unicode. We are adopting Combined upgrade and Unicode conversion strategy to minimise the downtime.
In source version ECC5 we are in support pack level 6. Should we need to update the support pack to any target version to start with CU&UC or we can start with ECC5 with SP 6 itself.
Since we cant afford more downtime for support pack update also, is it ok to start with upgrade and unicode conversion with current version.
please advice.
Regards
Vinay

Hello Vinay,
please note that as a prerequisite the Basis SP should be accurate for an MDMP conversion.
There is no MUST to have the latest Basis SP, but without you could have severe issues in SPUMG.
On the application side, there are in most cases no hard requirements on the SP level.
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel
SAP AG

Unicode conversion and patching simultaneously

Hi All -
We are planning to convert our core ECC 6.0 system to Unicode this year as well as patch it to the latest support pack stack. In order to minimize regression testing time, we are going to do them both at the same time so the functional teams only have to test once.
The question is which order to perform the tasks in: convert to Unicode first, THEN patch, or patch, THEN convert? I'm not sure the order matters, but I can't find any definite documentation either way. Has anyone had any experience with this that they would be willing to share?
Thanks for your help!
Abby

Hi Abby,
this depends on what you mean by "patches" ?
Do you want to combine the Unicode conversion with applying support packages only ?
Or do you want to implement EhPs as well ?
If you go for EhPs, I would recommend to do this before the Unicode conversion. This is also the "normal" approach when combining an upgrade with a Unicode conversion.
In case of support packages only, both ways are possible (Unicode first and then SPs or vice versa) ...
By the way I assume you do not have an MDMP system - this would add some additional constraints ...
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel
SAP AG

Preparing for upgrade and Unicode conversion while on 4.6c

We're currently on 4.6c and preparing to upgrade to ERP 2005 and do a Unicode conversion. I'm trying to compile a list of coding techniques that can used in 4.6c that will minimize changes needed for Unicode. Does anyone have such a list?
Some things I've discovered reading about Unicode include:
1) Use GUI_UPLOAD and GUI_DOWNLOAD rather than WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD.
2) Structures or table headers that contain non-character data need to be identical when moving, comparing, selecting into, updating from, etc. This includes not moving structures/tables with non-character data to a character field or vice-versa.
3) Offsets can't cross non-character data.
4) Assign statement with offset must specify a length.
5) Open dataset must specify "FOR INPUT", "FOR OUTPUT", "FOR APPENDING", or "FOR UPDATE". It no longer defaults to FOR INPUT when omitted.
6) Many implicit conversions from char to numeric are no longer allowed. Use explicit conversion instead; such as the move statement.
I know there are others. Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Mark Perrey

Hai Mark
Check the following F.M Replacents
Upgrade Error Details     Suggestions
Function Module "DOCUMENT_REGISTRY_PROGRAM"not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module CV120_GET_APPL_FROM_REGISTRY.
Function Module "RP_HIRE+FIRE"not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module RP_HIRE_FIRE .
Function Module "ME_READ_HEADER_SINGLE" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module ME_EKKO_SINGLE_READ.
Function Module "ME_READ_ITEM_SINGLE" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module ME_EKPO_SINGLE_READ.
Function Module "RZL_ALERT_CONTROL" not found in the target system     Function Module "RZL_ALERT_CONTROL" is not available in the Enterprise Version. Suggest to use the function module "TH_SEND_ADM_MESS" to acheive the same functionality of "RZL_ALERT_CONTROL".
Function Module "MM_SELECT_ADDRESS" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module MM_SELECT_PARTNER.
Function Module "MM_READ_ADDRESS" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module MM_PARTNERS_FOR_MESSAGING
Function Module "ME_VALUES_T161" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module HELP_VALUES_BSART.
Function Module "ME_VALUES_T024W" not found in the target system     . Suggest to replace this FM with the function module HELP_VALUES_WERKS.
Function Module "SD_PACKING_REFRESH" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module HU_PACKING_REFRESH.
Function Module "SD_PACKING_RENAME" not found in the target system      Suggest to replace this FM with the function module V51P_PACKING_RENAME.
Function Module "RV_EXPORT_CONTROL_UPDATE" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module RV_EXPORT_CONTROL_UPD_PREPARE.
Function Module "RV_INVOICE_COPY" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module RV_SALES_DOCUMENT_COPY.
Function Module "SD_SCHEDULE_AGREEMENT_PACKING" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module HU_PACKING_SALES_PROPOSAL.
Function Module "SERIAL_RENUM_WV" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module IWOL_WV_SWITCH_NUMBER.
Function Module "CUD0_DISPLAY_CONFIGURATION" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module VC_I_DISPLAY_CONFIGURATION.
Function Module "SD_PACKING_CREATE" not found in the target system     Suggest to replace this FM with the function module V51F_PACKING_CREATE.
Function Module "FI_ARCHIVE_CHECK_DOC" not found in the target system     Function Module FI_ARCHIVE_CHECK_DOC is not available in the Enterprise Version. Suggest to replace this FM with the function module FI_DOCUMENT_ARCH_CHECK_DOCS.
Function Module "OPEN_FI_CHECK" not found in the target system     Function Module OPEN_FI_CHECK is not available in the Enterprise Version. Suggest to replace this FM with the function module OPEN_FI_PERFORM_******_E.
Function Module "SD_PACKING_UPDATE"not found in the target system     Function Module SD_PACKING_UPDATE is not available in the Enterprise Version. Suggest to replace this FM with the function module HU_PACKING_UPDATE.
Function Module "F4_MACO" is being used in the program     Function Module "F4_MACO" is not available in the Enterprise Version. Since the Matchcode objects are not used in the Enterprise Version, Suggest to replace this FM with Search help's Value Request function module F4_SEARCH_HELP.
Function Module "SWZ_AI_RELEASE_S" is used in the program     Suggest to use the function module "SWZ_AI_RELEASE" instead of "SWZ_AI_RELEASE_S".
Function Module "SWW_WI_ORGTASK_READ" is used in the program      Suggest to replace this FM with the function module RH_WI_ORGTASK_READ.
Function Module "RH_READ_EXCEL_PATH" is being used in the program     Suggest to replace this FM with "RH_CHECK_EXCEL_SUPPORT".
Function Module "RZL_ALERT_CONTROL" is used in the program     Function Module "RZL_ALERT_CONTROL" is not available in the Enterprise Version. Suggest to use the function module "TH_SEND_ADM_MESS" to acheive the same functionality of "RZL_ALERT_CONTROL".
Function Module "CONVERT_TO_OTHER_CURRENCY" is used in the program     Suggest to ruse the function module "CONVERT_TO_LOCAL_CURRENCY" for currency conversion.
Function Module "LOAN_TABLECONTROL_SCROLLING" is not available in the Enterprise Version.      Suggest to replace this FM with the function module SCROLLING_IN_TABLE.
CALL FUNCTION 'DOWNLOAD' used in program is obsolete in target system.     "DOWNLOAD function module is obsolete and result in errors on Unicode systems or on systems that may potentially be Unicode enabled.
Suggest to use the unicode enabled methods
FILE_SAVE_DIALOG and GUI_DOWNLOAD
from class CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES.
Note:
However, to support existing applications, a compatibility mode was added to the function module(enhanced with Support Package) that will forward calls to DOWNLOAD to the new GUI_DOWNLOAD functions."
CALL FUNCTION 'HELP_VALUES_GET_NO_DD_NAME' used in program is obsolete in target system.     "HELP_VALUES_GET_NO_DD_NAME function module is obsolete and result in errors on Unicode systems or on systems that may potentially be Unicode enabled.
Suggest to use the function module F4IF_INT_TABLE_VALUE_REQUEST in the target system."
CALL FUNCTION 'POPUP_TO_CONFIRM_LOSS_OF_DATA' used in program is obsolete in target system.     "POPUP_TO_CONFIRM_LOSS_OF_DATA is obsolete in the target system.
Suggest to use function module POPUP_TO_CONFIRM."
CALL FUNCTION 'POPUP_TO_CONFIRM_STEP' used in program is obsolete in target system.     "POPUP_TO_CONFIRM_STEP is obsolete in the target system.
Suggest to use function module POPUP_TO_CONFIRM."
CALL FUNCTION 'WS_DOWNLOAD' used in program is obsolete in target system.     "WS_DOWNLOAD function module is obsolete and result in errors on Unicode systems or on systems that may potentially be Unicode enabled.
Suggest to use the unicode enabled GUI_DOWNLOAD function module.
Note:
However, to support existing applications, a compatibility mode was added to the function module(enhanced with Support Package) that will forward calls to WS_DOWNLOAD to the new GUI_DOWNLOAD function."
CALL FUNCTION 'WS_FILENAME_GET' used in program is obsolete in target system.     "WS_FILENAME_GET function module is obsolete, and results in errors on Unicode systems.
Suggest to use FILE_OPEN_DIALOG und FILE_SAVE_DIALOG Unicode-enabled methods of the cl_gui_frontend_services class.
Note:
New applications should restart on these methods instead of the function module. The function module is extended by a Support Package so that it diverts calls to the methods without the application having to be changed."
CALL FUNCTION 'WS_UPLOAD' used in program is obsolete in target system.     "WS_UPLOAD function module is obsolete and result in errors on Unicode systems or on systems that may potentially be Unicode enabled.
Suggest to use the unicode enabled GUI_UPLOAD function module.
Note:
However, to support existing applications, a compatibility mode was added to the function module(enhanced with Support Package) that will forward calls to WS_UPLOAD to the new GUI_UPLOAD function."
Function parameters EBENE, GRUPP, DATE_LOW, DATE_HIGH, BANKK. BUKRS, S_BUKRS, S_DISPW in function module CASH_FORECAST_TR_SELECT_ITEM is missing in the target system.     "Function Module CASH_FORECAST_TR_SELECT_ITEM is no longer used, instead it has been split based on the functionalities.
Suggest to use function module
1) CASH_FORECAST_PR_SELECT_ITEM for Payment Arrangements.
2) For TR, WP, DA use function module CASH_FORECAST_TR_ITEM_2.
The IMPORT and TABLES parameters of the above 2 function modules are almost same as CASH_FORECAST_TR_SELECT_ITEM.
The IMPORT parameter BUKRS is not available in the above 2 function modules. Hence suggest to change the coding accordingly."
Import parameter BUKRS in function CASH_FORECAST_LO_SELECT_ITEM is missing in the target system.     "Import parameter BUKRS in function CASH_FORECAST_LO_SELECT_ITEM is not available in the target system.
Also the coding in Function Module based on the parameter BUKRS has been removed, instead the TABLES parameter S_BUKRS and S_GSBER has been used.
Suggest to check the coding in the program accordingly.
Import parameter BUKRS in function CASH_FORECAST_RE_SELECT_ITEM is missing in the target system.     "Import parameter BUKRS in function CASH_FORECAST_RE_SELECT_ITEM is not available in the target system.
Also the coding in Function Module based on the parameter BUKRS has been removed, instead the TABLES parameter S_BUKRS and S_GSBER(new parameter) has been used.
Suggest to check the coding in the program accordingly.
Function Module HELP_VALUES_GET_WITH_MACO is obsolete in target system     Suggest to use F4IF_FIELD_VALUE_REQUEST
Function Module G_OBJECT_GET is obsolete in target system.     Suggest to Use G_INTERVAL_GET_NEXT
Function Module READ_COSTCENTER is obsolete in target system     Suggest to Use K_COSTCENTER_SELECT_SINGLE
Function Module K_BUSINESS_PROCESS_READ_MULTI is obsolete or not available in target system     Suggest to Use K_PROCESSES_SELECT_TAB
G_SET_AVAILABLE     Suggest to Use G_SET_GET_INFO
Function Module G_SET_DOUBLE_CHECK is obsolete or not available in target system     "DO NOT CALL THIS FUNCTION MODULE
FROM 4.0A VERSION ,THIS PROBLEM WILL NOT OCCUR"
Function Module HELP_VALUES_GET is obsolete or not available in target system     Suggest to Use F4IF_FIELD_VALUE_REQUEST
G_SELECT_SET     Suggest to Use G_SET_SELECT
Function Module G_SET_AVAILABLE is obsolete or not available in target system     Suggest to Use G_SET_GET_INFO
Function Module NAMETAB_GET is obsolete or not available in target system     Suggest to Use DDIF_FIELDINFO_GET
Function Module DD_GET_DD03P is obsolete or not available in target system     Suggest to Use DDIF_FIELDINFO_GET / DDIF_TABL_GET
CALL FUNCTION 'POPUP_TO_CONFIRM_WITH_MESSAGE' used in program is obsolete in target system.     Suggest to use function module POPUP_TO_CONFIRM.
CALL FUNCTION 'POPUP_TO_DECIDE' used in program is obsolete in target system.     Suggest to use function module POPUP_TO_CONFIRM.
Function Module HELP_VALUES_GET_WITH_TABLE is obsolete or not available in target system     Suggest to Use F4TOOL_F4FUNCTION_BRIDGE
Function Module CLPB_EXPORT is obsolete or not available in target system     "Suggest to Use Suggest to use the unicode enabled methods
CLIPBOARD_EXPORT from class CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES."
Function Module SAP_TO_ISO_MEASURE_UNIT_CODE is obsolete or not available in target system     Suggest to Use UNIT_OF_MEASURE_SAP_TO_ISO
Regards
Sreeni

Wrong text in ADRC and LFA1 table after Unicode conversion

Hello,
We are doing MDMP to Unicode on SAP 4.7 system.
In post unicode activities,we had corrected the garbage characters in
table ADRC
by converting to target langauage ZH using SUMG t-code.
Condition used for addind table ADRC in SUMG is LANGU ='1' and
LANGU_CREA = 'EN'
But after converting and saving the data,most of the records have
incorrect character in word.
and text field of search term/company name/city in table LFA1 are also
wrong in correspond field in table ADRC.
Thanks
Harshavardhan

Hi Harshavardhan,
Assumption: You have Chinese entries in table ADRC with ADRC-LANGU_CREA = EN
Now you have to distinguish two problems:
1) Chinese texts are stored in ADRC fields, which are NOT used for search help texts (most of the fields - e.g. ADRC-NAME1):
These texts can be handled in two ways:
a) Change LANGU_CREA = EN to LANGU_CREA = ZH for these entries (e.g. where ADRC-COUNTRY = CN) before the Unicode conversion (by the way, I would not use ADRC-LANGU, since this is the communication language, which does not necessarily comply with the code page of the entry).
This needs to be done in a similar way as shown in z-reports described in SAP Note 634839 ( although this specific fool-the-system case is not covered there - you have to adapt those examples)
b) Use SUMG to repair the entries using language ZH (as you already did)
My favourite would be a), as this can be done before the conversion (Note that SUMG ineeds to be executed during downtime !)
2) Chinese texts are stored in ADRC fields, which are used for search help texts (e.g. ADRC-MC_NAME1):
a) If these entries were inserted / changed with logon language ZH, then point 1) applies
b) If users logged on with logon language EN and created the entries, then most of these texts are destroyed already in Non-Unicode system. Then there is no automatic repair possible (at least point 1 does not work). Here my statement from before is valid:
Those entries need to be generated again - e.g. if you do a dummy change on the name.
According to my knowledge, this is a manual effort (either before or after the conversion) - but maybe it can be automized ...
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel
SAP AG

Combined Upgrade and Unicode conversion question

Hello Everyone,
I will be performing combined Upgrade and Unicode conversion soon. Currently i have run Prepare and do not have any errors.
I have already run SPUMG consistency check and i do not have any errors there. Since this is Combined Upgrade and unicode conversion according to guide i do not need to do the Nametab conversion right now. But now if i go this place:
SPUMG -> Status -> Additional Information , i see a status with red for Unicode nametabs are not consistent or not up-to-date.
Please let me know if i can ignore this step and do the nametab conversion after upgrade is complete and before unicode conversion.
Thanks,
FBK

Please follow the instructions from the guides.
The Unicode nametabs will be generated automatically during the upgrade.
An additional check is integrated into the final preparation steps in the target releases.
Regards,
Ronald

Unicode conversion plan and estimate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for