Uninstall 10 Recommended patch

Hi Brother,
How can I uninstall Solaris 10 Recommended? I can't found from tech notes and metalink.

Check the log files for the patches installed in /var/sadm/install_data and remove the patches manually. No ready made tools avaiable.

Similar Messages

How to apply 3 RPC (Recommended Patch Collection)

Dear,
I am fresher in the field of Oracle EBS R12. As per recurrence of the create accounting issues on PAYABLE module: the Metalink representative recommends to apply the following patch collection:
We strongly recommends to apply the following 3 RPC (Recommended Patch Collection):
Patch 13563472:R12.AP.B
Patch 13563481:R12.AP.B
Patch 13563489:R12.AP.B
So I want to know how to apply these patches, one by one or collectively. I shall be very thankful if you share all steps to apply these patches with me.
Stay blessed.
Best Regards,
Ahmed.

I have corrected some of you steps and made below:-
1. Stop applicaiton services.
2. Stop Database Services or bring database in hot backup mode.
3. Take backup(both apps and DB).
4) Start Database or bring database out of backup mode.
6) Bring application in maintenance mode.
7) Extract the patch into a folder.
8)Follow readme document of the patch.
9) use adpatch utility to apply the patch.
10) disable maintenance mode
11) start application services and test the application functionality.
I need your help at step # 5. In this scenario, will i take cold backup of data files only or whole backup of DB Tier & Application Tier. Whole backup of DB and apps Tier.
And Please also tell me if i want to reverse the patch operation, what do i need ? only restore the data files. Please tell me step by step. I shall be very thank full to you. Your posts are always helpful for us.restore complete db and apps tier.
If you have taken cold backup prior to patching activity then to undo a patch use below steps:-
1)Stop apps and db tier.
2)Clear all apps and db mount points.
3) Restore backup taken prior to patching activity.
4) Start database and listener.
5) Start application.
If you have taken hot backup then after step 3 you need to recover the database and rest all steps remain same.
Also check below metalink note:-
How to uninstall backout rollback an Oracle Applications 11i or R12 Patch [ID 343987.1]
Thanks,
JD
Thanks,
JD

R12.1.3 supply chain management Recommended Patch Collection

Hi experts,
We upgraded our EBS R12.1.1 application to R12.1.3.Our database is 11.2.03(not updated).
Please let me know what all the Oracle recommended patches we have to apply for SCM.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neelaprasad.A.S

Yah that seems to work (just tired it by uninstalling my java client and it re-installs it) but I still get the FRM-92095 error after the initial Security Warning error.
Now if I go back and review 393931.1 I do recall it saying this:
The JRE 7 Plug-in is certified for Oracle E-Business Suite R12.0.x and 12.1.x with the following minimum patch requirements:
- Oracle forms 10.1.2.3 or higher with Patch 14614795 or later (See Document 437878.1 titled, 'Upgrading OracleAS 10g Forms and Reports in Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12' for the latest available forms patches)
I did try and apply 14614795 but I got some opatch error "The patch directory 14614795 doesn't match the patch id." and I think the next day I forgot about that issue.
Now I see if I review Doc ID 437878.1 I see there is a consolidated in bundle patch 14825718 so maybe I'll try that and hope I haven't done this all backwards...

Management console problem after installing recommended patch cluster

Hello everyone.
I just got a new SUN 440 server, it didn't come with the solaris os installed and so I installed solaris 9 12/03 to it. The installation went fine and I could start the management console with no problems at all. Then I went to sunsolve.sun.com to download the latest recommended patch clusters for solaris 9 (this was yesterday Sept.-06-2006), I downloaded the file, checked it with md5sum, unzipped it, went to single user mode and ran the install_patch script. After the patch cluster finished installing I rebooted the server for the patches to take effect, I logged in, tried to run console management 2.1 and it starts OK but I cannot use any services it offers because it says (in the console events):
"Server Not Running: no solaris management console server was available on the specified server. Please ensure there is a Solaris Management Console server available on the specified host and that it is running"
When I click on "See Exception" I get (for a particular service that is... in this case com.sun.admin.fsmgr.client.VFsMgr - for managing file systems):
java.rmi.RemoteException: Server RMI is null:
at sun.com.management.viperimpl.client.ViperClient.lookupServer(ViperClient.java:376)and so on...
I already checked that the service is running on port 898 and it seems that there is no other app. using that same port. I also restarted the service using /etc/init.d.init stop/status/start but I get the same results.
I don't know solaris very much and don't know what else to do, please help.
Thanks in advance.

Well, I guess what you see isn't what you get.
Guess I'm used to the fact USENET just left things formatted the way they were :-O

How to backout a Recommended Patch cluster deployment in Solstice disksuite

Hello Admin's,
I am planning to use the following Plan of action for deploying the latest Solaris 8 Recommended Patch cluster on the production server's i support.My
concern is if the patching activity fails or the application and Oracle databases dont come up after deploying the patch cluster.How do i revert back to system to its original state using the submirror's which i have detached prior to patching the system :
1) Will shutdown the applications and the databases on the server:
2) Will capture the output of the following commands :
df -k
ifconfig -a
contents of the files /etc/passwd /etc/shadow /etc/vfstab /etc/system
metastat -p
netstat -rn
prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0
prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c1t1d0s0
3) We bring the system to the ok prompt
4) We will try to boot the system from both the disk's which are part of the d10 metadevice for root filesystem
=======================================================================================
user1@myserver>pwd ; df -k / ; ls -lt | egrep '(c1t0d0s0|c1t1d0s0)' ; prtconf -vp | grep bootpath ; metastat d10
/dev/dsk
Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/md/dsk/d10 8258597 3435895 4740117 43% /
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 Jul 28 2003 c1t0d0s0 -> ../../devices/pci@1c,600000/scsi@2/sd@0,0:a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 Jul 28 2003 c1t1d0s0 -> ../../devices/pci@1c,600000/scsi@2/sd@1,0:a
bootpath: '/pci@1c,600000/scsi@2/disk@0,0:a'
d10: Mirror
Submirror 0: d11
State: Okay
Submirror 1: d12
State: Okay
Pass: 1
Read option: roundrobin (default)
Write option: parallel (default)
Size: 16779312 blocks
d11: Submirror of d10
State: Okay
Size: 16779312 blocks
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase State Hot Spare
c1t0d0s0 0 No Okay
d12: Submirror of d10
State: Okay
Size: 16779312 blocks
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase State Hot Spare
c1t1d0s0 0 No Okay
user1@myserver>
===================================================================================
ok nvalias backup_root <disk path>
Redefine the boot-device variable to reference both the primary and secondary submirrors, in the order in which you want to access them. For example:
ok printenv boot-device
boot-device= disk net
ok setenv boot-device disk backup_root net
boot-device= disk backup_root net
In the event of primary root disk failure, the system automatically boots from the secondary submirror. To test the secondary submirror, boot the system manually, as follows:
ok boot backup_root
user1@myserver>metadb -i
flags first blk block count
a m p luo 16 1034 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7
a p luo 1050 1034 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7
a p luo 2084 1034 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7
a p luo 16 1034 /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s7
a p luo 1050 1034 /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s7
a p luo 2084 1034 /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s7
o - replica active prior to last mddb configuration change
u - replica is up to date
l - locator for this replica was read successfully
c - replica's location was in /etc/lvm/mddb.cf
p - replica's location was patched in kernel
m - replica is master, this is replica selected as input
W - replica has device write errors
a - replica is active, commits are occurring to this replica
M - replica had problem with master blocks
D - replica had problem with data blocks
F - replica had format problems
S - replica is too small to hold current data base
R - replica had device read errors
user1@myserver>df -k
Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/md/dsk/d10 8258597 3435896 4740116 43% /
/dev/md/dsk/d40 2053605 929873 1062124 47% /usr
/proc 0 0 0 0% /proc
fd 0 0 0 0% /dev/fd
mnttab 0 0 0 0% /etc/mnttab
/dev/md/dsk/d30 2053605 937231 1054766 48% /var
swap 2606008 24 2605984 1% /var/run
swap 6102504 3496520 2605984 58% /tmp
/dev/md/dsk/d60 13318206 8936244 4248780 68% /u01
/dev/md/dsk/d50 5161437 2916925 2192898 58% /opt
user1@myserver>metastat d40
d40: Mirror
Submirror 0: d41
State: Okay
Submirror 1: d42
State: Okay
Pass: 1
Read option: roundrobin (default)
Write option: parallel (default)
Size: 4194828 blocks
d41: Submirror of d40
State: Okay
Size: 4194828 blocks
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase State Hot Spare
c1t0d0s4 0 No Okay
d42: Submirror of d40
State: Okay
Size: 4194828 blocks
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase State Hot Spare
c1t1d0s4 0 No Okay
user1@myserver>metastat d30
d30: Mirror
Submirror 0: d31
State: Okay
Submirror 1: d32
State: Okay
Pass: 1
Read option: roundrobin (default)
Write option: parallel (default)
Size: 4194828 blocks
d31: Submirror of d30
State: Okay
Size: 4194828 blocks
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase State Hot Spare
c1t0d0s3 0 No Okay
d32: Submirror of d30
State: Okay
Size: 4194828 blocks
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase State Hot Spare
c1t1d0s3 0 No Okay
user1@myserver>metastat d50
d50: Mirror
Submirror 0: d51
State: Okay
Submirror 1: d52
State: Okay
Pass: 1
Read option: roundrobin (default)
Write option: parallel (default)
Size: 10487070 blocks
d51: Submirror of d50
State: Okay
Size: 10487070 blocks
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase State Hot Spare
c1t0d0s5 0 No Okay
d52: Submirror of d50
State: Okay
Size: 10487070 blocks
Stripe 0:
Device Start Block Dbase State Hot Spare
c1t1d0s5 0 No Okay
user1@myserver>metastat -p
d10 -m d11 d12 1
d11 1 1 c1t0d0s0
d12 1 1 c1t1d0s0
d20 -m d21 d22 1
d21 1 1 c1t0d0s1
d22 1 1 c1t1d0s1
d30 -m d31 d32 1
d31 1 1 c1t0d0s3
d32 1 1 c1t1d0s3
d40 -m d41 d42 1
d41 1 1 c1t0d0s4
d42 1 1 c1t1d0s4
d50 -m d51 d52 1
d51 1 1 c1t0d0s5
d52 1 1 c1t1d0s5
d60 -m d61 d62 1
d61 1 1 c1t0d0s6
d62 1 1 c1t1d0s6
user1@myserver>pkginfo -l SUNWmdg
PKGINST: SUNWmdg
NAME: Solstice DiskSuite Tool
CATEGORY: system
ARCH: sparc
VERSION: 4.2.1,REV=1999.11.04.18.29
BASEDIR: /
VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
DESC: Solstice DiskSuite Tool
PSTAMP: 11/04/99-18:32:06
INSTDATE: Apr 16 2004 11:10
VSTOCK: 258-6252-11
HOTLINE: Please contact your local service provider
STATUS: completely installed
FILES: 150 installed pathnames
6 shared pathnames
19 directories
1 executables
7327 blocks used (approx)
user1@myserver>
=======================================================================================
5) After successfully testing the above we will bring the system to the single user mode
# reboot -- -s
6) Detach the following sub-mirrors :
# metadetach -f d10 d12
#metadetach -f d30 d32
#metadetach -f d40 d42
#metadetach -f d50 d52
# metastat =====> (to check if the submirror�s are successfully detached)
7) Applying patch on the server
After patch installation is complete will be rebooting the server to single user mode
# reboot -- -s
confirming if patch installation was successful (uname �a) .
8) Will be booting the server to the multiuser mode (init 3) and confirming with the database and the application teams if the
Applications/databases are working fine .Once confirmed successful will be reattaching the d12 submirror.
# metattach d12 d10
# metattach d30 d32
#metattach d40 d42
# metattach d50 d52
# metastat d10 =====> (to check the submirror is successfully reattached)
user1@myserver>uname -a ; cat /etc/release ; date
SunOS myserver 5.8 Generic_117350-04 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V210
Solaris 8 HW 12/02 s28s_hw1wos_06a SPARC
Copyright 2002 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Assembled 12 December 2002
Mon Apr 14 17:10:09 BST 2008
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recommended patch sets are and to the best of my knowledge have always been regenerated twice a month.
I think your thinking of maintenance releases. When they generate a new CD image which can be used to do an upgrade install.
They try to generate those every 6 months, but the schedule often slips.
The two most recent were sol10 11/06 and sol10 8/07.

MB.ACT light OFF --- after Solaris 9 recommended patch cluster applied

After applying the recommended patch cluster to several SunFire V210s/V240s the "system ready" or "activity" light on the front panel no longer illuminates. The systems come up fine and are fully functional, just no light.
While this has absolutely no impact on usability it is a bit disconcerting for the folks in the server room when glancing at the rack and not seeing the typical green light.
I first noticed the problem in mid 2007 and have tried patch clusters as recent as last month, but the light remains out.
One interesting discovery is that if I reset (hard) the ALOM module the light comes back on. However, if the system is subsequently rebooted for any reason the light does not come back on...
If anyone can shed some light on the issue I would greatly appreciate it!
-Sap

continued.
I removed patch 138217-01 (svccfg & svcprop patch) and re-applied it.
Then, after booting into S-mode, I tried to continue with the broken patch 139555-08 (kernel).
It ends with
! root@jumpstart:/var/spool/patch # patchadd 139555-08
Validating patches...
Loading patches installed on the system...
Done!
Loading patches requested to install.
Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
Checking non-global zones...
This patch passes the non-global zone check.
139555-08
Summary for zones:
Zone oem
Rejected patches:
None.
Patches that passed the dependency check:
139555-08
Patching global zone
Adding patches...
Checking installed patches...
Executing prepatch script...
Installing patch packages...
Pkgadd failed. See /var/tmp/139555-08.log.21103 for details
Patchadd is terminating.
! root@jumpstart:/var/spool/patch #the logfile shows
! root@jumpstart:/var/spool/patch # vi /var/tmp/139555-08.log.21103
Dryrun complete.
No changes were made to the system.
This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
version of a package which is already installed. This installation
will attempt to overwrite this package.
pkgadd: ERROR: couldn't lock in /var/run/.patchSafeMode/root/var/sadm/install (s
erver running?): Resource temporarily unavailable
Installation of <SUNWarc> failed (internal error).
No changes were made to the system.Help!
-- Nick

Solaris reboot loop after recommended patch cluster

Hi,
I have a problem with my solaris 10 x86 install on my intel notebook. after installing the latest recommended patch cluster and the necessary reboot my latop stays in a loop.
one of the last lines I was able to see:
panic[cpu0]/thread=fec1d660: boot_mapin():No pp for pfnum=20fff
fec33b4c genunix:main+1b ()
skipping system dump - ....
rebooting...
any ideas ?
cu+thx

This horrible patch caught me out too. I found this and it fixed my problem.
http://weblog.erenkrantz.com/weblog/software/solaris
<snip>
[...at the Solaris boot prompt; enable kmdb, debugging, and single-user
so that you can remove the patch and reboot...]
boot -kds
[...wait for it to boot...]
physmax:w
:c
[...you'll see 'stop on write of'...]
physmax/X
[...you'll see something like the following line:
physmax: bff7f
this is a hex number; add one; so if you see bff7f,
your next line will need to be bff80...]
physxmax/W bff80
:c
[...system will boot and go into single user mode...
now, go toss those patches...]
patchrm 118844-19 120662-03 118345-12 118376-04 \
118565-03 118886-01 119076-10 118813-01 \
118881-02 120082-07 119851-02
shutdown -i6 -y -g0 "sun should test their patches"
</snip>

Problem: installing Recommend Patch Cluster: patch 140900-10 fails

I don't know if this is correct location for this thread (admin/moderator move as required).
We have a number of Solaris x86 hosts (ie 4) and I'm trying to get the patched and up to date.
I obtained the latest Recommended Patch Cluster (dated 28Sep2010).
I installed it on host A yesterday, 2 hours 9 mins, no problems.
I tried to install it on host B today, and that was just a critical failure.
Host B failed to install 140900-01, because the non global zones rejected the patch because dependancy 138218-01 wasn't installed in the non global zones.
Looking closer, it appears that 138218-01 is for global zone installation only; so it makes sense that the non global zones rejected it.
However, both hosts were in single user mode when installing the cluster and both hosts have non global zones.
140900-01 installed on host A with log:
| This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
| version of a package which is already installed. This installation
| will attempt to overwrite this package.
|
| Dryrun complete.
| No changes were made to the system.
|
| This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
| version of a package which is already installed. This installation
| will attempt to overwrite this package.
|
|
| Installation of <SUNWcsu> was successful.
140900-1 failed on host B with this log:
| Validating patches...
|
| Loading patches installed on the system...
|
| Done!
|
| Loading patches requested to install.
|
| Done!
|
| Checking patches that you specified for installation.
|
| Done!
|
|
| Approved patches will be installed in this order:
|
| 140900-01
|
|
| Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
|
| Checking non-global zones...
|
| Checking non-global zones...
|
| Restoring state for non-global zone X...
| Restoring state for non-global zone Y...
| Restoring state for non-global zone Z...
|
| This patch passes the non-global zone check.
|
| None.
|
|
| Summary for zones:
|
| Zone X
|
| Rejected patches:
| 140900-01
| Patches that passed the dependency check:
| None.
|
|
| Zone Y
|
| Rejected patches:
| 140900-01
| Patches that passed the dependency check:
| None.
|
|
| Zone Z
|
| Rejected patches:
| 140900-01
| Patches that passed the dependency check:
| None.
|
| Fatal failure occurred - impossible to install any patches.
| X: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
| Y: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
| Z: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
| Fatal failure occurred - impossible to install any patches.
| ----
| patchadd exit code : 1
| application of 140900-01 failed : unhandled subprocess exit status '1' (exit 1 b
| ranch)
| finish time : 2010.10.02 09:47:18
| FINISHED : application of 140900-01
It looks as if the patch strategy is completely different for the two hosts; both are solaris x86 (A is a V40z; B is a V20z).
Trying to use "-G" with patchadd crabs the patch is for global zones only and stops (ie it's almost as if it thinks installation is being attempted in a non global zone).
Without "-G" same behavior as patch cluster install attempt (no surprise there).
I have inherited this machines; I am told each of these machines were upgraded to Solaris 10u6 in June 2009.
Other than the 4-5 months it took oracle to get our update entitlement to us, we've had no problems.
I'm at a loss here, I don't see anyone else having this type of issue.
Can someone point the way...?
What am I missing...?

Well, I guess what you see isn't what you get.
Guess I'm used to the fact USENET just left things formatted the way they were :-O

Recommended patches on oracle 10.2.0.4 RAC database and CRS

Hi,
This week I am planning to upgrade my oracle 10.2.0.2 RAC database oracle 10.2.0.4.
Also, I want to apply if any recommended patches we can apply on 10.2.0.4 database or on CRS 10.2.0.4
I searched in metalink, but in vain i didn't get any exact patches recommended on 10.2.0.4.
If you have any patch numbers that need to be applied on oracle 10.2.0.4 RAC database, please provide me.
Thanks,
Mahi

Check out MOS Doc 756671.1 - Oracle Recommended Patches -- Oracle Database
HTH
Srini

Solaris 10 SPARC Recommended Patch Cluster for 2008 quarter 3 version

Dear All,
Could any one please guide me, where I can download "Solaris 10 SPARC Recommended Patch Cluster" for 2008 quarter 3 version.
I have checked in sunsolve.sun.com, I'm able to find only the latest release.
please guide me.
Thanks and regards,
veera

Ok,
Here's a cute little formula to try using your systems parameters to gain some "head's-up" on an expected or estimated time to complete the patch run.
You will need a few things to prepare.
Number of "real" CPU's (not hyperthreads)
Speed of each CPU as a whole number i.e 2.87Ghz = 2,867
the total number of patches from the cluster i.e. Sept 15th = 381 (Solaris 10)
Network factor if using NFS = 2.5
local cluster file factor = 1.5
Patch cluster on CDROM factor = 3.25
Now, combine all of those elements in this equation:
{ ( #1 * #2 ) / #3 * factor(#4 or #5 or #6) }
This will yield a number in minutes of patch run time. Then all you will need to add is the standard boot up time to get the total of all patching and reboot.
Of course you could write a script to extract all of this information and feed it to "bc -l" to get a quick figure.
Example, on one of my Solaris 10 boxes with the information filled in to the equation:
#> echo "((4*2660)/381)*1.5"|bc -l
#> 41.88976377952755905511
It actually took 44.2 minutes to complete the patching of this box plus another 12 minutes to reboot. But all in all a pretty fair estimate I think.

Performace problem in oracle DB after Solaris 10 recommended patching

Dear All,
We are facing some performance problems in our oracle DB qerries and reports recently. We applied Solaris 10 recommended patchset on april 24th. Our monthly report generation acitivity is now running for last 3 days i.e may 11,12,13 and application team is complaining of degraded performance. I can see that the cpu usage on the server is about 100% during the report generation , but everything else is fine. Free memory is 15gb , all mountpoints are under 80% and there is no other hardware issue as well.
Now app team is suspecting that last month patching could be the cause of the problem, because till last month they were performing this activity without having a performance degradtion.
I just need to be sure that solaris 10 recommended patches are not causing this issue. Any of you ever faced such an issue after patch installation ?
The server is V490 with 8 cpu / 32gb RAM. Any hints will be appreciated ?
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: 1005720 on May 13, 2013 9:58 PM

I did not archive the o/p of prstat but have o/p of top with me
195 processes: 175 sleeping, 13 running, 1 zombie, 6 on cpu
CPU states: 0.0% idle, 78.4% user, 21.6% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 32G phys mem, 16G free mem, 70G total swap, 70G free swap
PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND
18964 oracle 39 41 0 6389M 5488M cpu/1 2:50 15.04% oracle
19638 oracle 26 59 0 6390M 5490M run 0:27 8.58% oracle
19648 oracle 36 31 0 6418M 5516M run 0:21 5.92% oracle
19023 oracle 34 30 0 6398M 5498M run 0:37 5.88% oracle
7229 oracle 38 30 0 6427M 5514M run 234:24 5.69% oracle
6912 oracle 45 31 0 6395M 5483M cpu/16 218:04 5.31% oracle
7216 oracle 28 31 0 6430M 5517M run 232:40 5.04% oracle
19644 oracle 35 40 0 6390M 5490M cpu/17 0:24 4.74% oracle
6897 oracle 112 30 0 6392M 5479M run 236:38 4.52% oracle
3813 oracle 106 31 0 6428M 5528M run 100:11 4.43% oracle
18970 oracle 234 31 0 6398M 5499M cpu/0 1:45 4.15% oracle
19749 oracle 1 32 0 6386M 5486M run 0:00 4.05% oracle
19646 oracle 23 31 0 6405M 5505M run 0:25 3.61% oracle
18972 oracle 11 32 0 6398M 5497M run 2:18 3.61% oracle
7220 oracle 258 32 0 6468M 5555M cpu/3 113:13 3.56% oracle
During the entire issue there was no %iowait.

Applying recommended patch bundles to a Data Guard environment.

I've learned that there are 3 recommended patch bundles for 10.2.0.4 Data Guard, as follows:
7937113 - 10.2.0.4 Data Guard Logical Recommended Patch Bundle #1
7936993 - 10.2.0.4 Data Guard Physical Recommended Patch Bundle #1
7936793 - 10.2.0.4 Data Guard Broker Recommended Patch Bundle #1
My question is this...should I apply the logical and physical patch bundles to the primary database as well?
Thanks,
Michael Anderson
OCP - Bank of the West

That's what I suspected. Now, in my environment, I could never conceive of a situation where I would switch roles between the primary and the logical standby database, so I would only apply the DG physical patch bundle to the primary database but not the DG Logical patch bundle. Agree?

Recommended patch cluster release

Hello,
How often is the Recommended Patch cluster released?
A Couple of years ago, i was told at a Sun event during a session, that changes has been made en the way patch cluster was created, and that the patch clusters was created 4 times a year, to make it more streamlike, instead of creating patchclusters once in a while, when enough patches has been created. I need to know if it still works the way, that patch cluster are created 4 times a year, it is to be used with patch procedures and recommendations.
Best regards
Yngve Berthelsen

Recommended patch sets are and to the best of my knowledge have always been regenerated twice a month.
I think your thinking of maintenance releases. When they generate a new CD image which can be used to do an upgrade install.
They try to generate those every 6 months, but the schedule often slips.
The two most recent were sol10 11/06 and sol10 8/07.

Recommended Patch Level for ACS 4.2

Hi,
Is there a recommended patch level for ACS 4.2? I see a patch 4 and 5 can be downloaded. Any gotchas with either?
thanks
Bob

Bob,
I haven't had any issues with patch 5 for ACS 4.2. If you have any concerns please see the release notes for the patch.
HTH,
Mark

Where are older Recommended Patch Clusters located?

My project is spec'd to use the June 2009 Recommended Patch Cluster release, but I can't find the previous patch cluster releases. Is there anywhere on the Sun site that I can find the older patch clusters?

I ended up calling out Sun support, and after about a week he got back with us and said that although usually such a patch is available on a DVD he recieves every month, the June 2009 DVD was pulled due to "quality issues". Thank you both for your support.

Uninstall 10 Recommended patch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for