Unit of measure conversion for CIN is not relevant for pricing

During creation of Ad item type order, when we enter the planned ad size e.g. A CO (Columns) x B IN (Inches), the system is showing a message "Unit of measure conversion for CIN is not relevant for pricing" and pricing is not determined in the Billing Data Set. However if the planned ad size is maintained as A CO (Columns) x B MM (Millimeters), there is no impact to pricing conditions.
Any light how to fix this issue?
Thanks,
Suseela. V

Dear Suseela,
You need to maintain Unit of conversion using transaction code JH51. You have to follow the path Logistics-Advertising Management-Master Data-Conditions-Order/Billing Document-UM for Pricing.
Here you can maintain combination using Booking Unit, Content Component, Design type and assign Unit of Measure to get relevant pricing into billing set conditions.
Hope it will help. Thanks!
Regards
Indra

Similar Messages

  • Component material costing (Unit of Measure conversion) is not working at S

    Hi,
    Unit of Measure conversion factor (Value) is not working for component materials at Sales order level costing, but the same conversion factor is working fine at Standard cost estimation level.
    Example:
    Conversion Factor for Raw materials (Procurement in Tones, Consumption in Each)
    1 Ton (Rs.1000) = 10 Each (per Each u2013 Rs.100)
    For Manufacturing of 1 pc FG is required 1 each Raw material
    Issue: At sales Order level - Raw material costing is calculated at u201CTonu201D price u2013 Rs.1000 instead of u201CEachu201D price u2013 Rs.100. 
    Regards
    Nagesh

    Hi,
    Pricing (unit conversion) is done different for MM and SD process.
    MM has decided to use the old process which determines the values out of T006. There you have the conversion factors which are used in PO. If you create a sales order or billing document the determination will be different as the material master will be read.
    regards
    Waman

  • Automatically pick material master unit of measure conversion to routing

    I maintain finish goods conversion factor in material master u201CAdditional Data: Unit of measureu201D as M to KG and basic unit of measure for finish good in material master is in KG.
    I attached multiple operations for the finish goods material in routing.
    Some operations base unit of measure is M and others its KG.
    I want to pick material master unit of measure conversion automatically when Iu2019m creating routing for the finish good material in ca01. (Unit of measure conversion for header and operation of the operation)
    Can anyone letme know the SAP configuration for this.

    Hi!,
    Please expalin about the purpose of this requirement, because when you will create a order using that routing, at that time system will definately do the unit conversion automatically.
    Regards,
    Uday

  • Routing - decimal places for unit of measure conversion quantity

    Hello all,
    in the change routing screen in SAP (CA02), when going to a operation detail screen, a unit of measure conversation value can be defined. A value for header and operation can be made.
    Currently we cannot set any decimal values for operations, I get the error message: "decimal places are not permitted."
    Where in customizing can I change that?
    Thanks
    Anne

    Hello,
    thanks for the answers.
    The UoM is LB.
    I've already checked CUNI, but I can not find LB..?
    Also I've noticed other places in SAP, for example the base quantity of some operations in the routing have a numbers with 3 decimal places and the same UoM LB, so this looks like the UoM is setup fine, maybe there are just problems with this special screen?
    Thanks
    Anne

  • Unit of Measure Conversions.

    Hi All, I have Unit of Measure Conversion requirement in my reports, I would like to create a variable and user has an option to choose the Target UoM.
    For this I have referred RSUOM T-Code and got an option to create Target UoM Variable (Specifying Target UoM using a variable) but here my proble is, have to do conversion across dimensions as below.
    Unit of Measure conversions that I have across dimensions (all conversions both ways):
    tonne to kilotonne
    1000 GJoule to Million GJoule
    kilotonne to Million tonne
    tonne to Million tonne
    kilogram to tonne
    tonne to barrel
    kg to liter (spill)
    tonne to gallon
    Could anyone tell me, is it possible to do conversion Across dimensions? (i.e Mass to Volume), if itu2019s possible where we need to maintain the conversion values.
    I am not able to see any table which holds the values of Unit of Measure, I saw T006 but could not able tofind any info.
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi Kalyan,
    To convert from kg to litres you need material specific information like relative density .
    It can not be done with common values in UOM-conversions.
    e.g. the relative density for lead (11.35 kg/ litre) is different from the relative density for water (1 kg/litre)
    1 tonne = 1000 kgs for every material.
    Udo

  • Decimal in Unit of Measure conversion

    Hi Gurus,
    I want to enter decimals in Unit of Measure conversion. System is giving the error that "Decimal not permitted". Actually the scenario is we have a material with KG as a base unit of measure. The ordering unit is "L" litre and the conversion factor is:
    1 Litre = 0.792 KG
    But when I am going to enter the conversion the system is not allowing to enter decimal. What I need to do in the configuration to enable the decimal entry.
    Earliest response will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks

    >
    Imran Khan wrote:
    > I have entered 1000 Litre = 792 Kg, but when I order 1Kg, system is converting it into 12.62 Litres.
    >
    > Thanks
    if 792 kg equal to 1000 ltr,
    then 1 kg equals to 1,263 ltr.
    when do you see this "conversion" to 12,62 litres? in ME21N after you entered 1 KG?
    if yes, then your order unit is probably set to liter, further check if you have a rounding profile in material master or info record, that causes the switch from 1,26 to 12,62

  • Routing unit of measure conversion

    Dear guru ,
    I have a different unit of measure for one operation of my routing.
    Which is the problem if I maintain relation 1 to 1 in the routing unit of measure conversion ?
    Thanks.

    Dear  ,
    One operation of my routing have a different unit of measure (EA for operation , KG for routing).
    I don't know the exact conversion factor between operation and routing.
    This factor is only known after the confermation of the production order.
    Which problem occurs if i maintain relation 1 to 1 (numerator and denominator) in the routing unit of measure conversion.
    Thanks.

  • Report on material code, description and all unit of measure conversions

    report on  material code, description and all unit of measure conversions ?
    any ideas?

    Material Number MATNR
    with this key and SPRAS (the desired Language key)
    from MAKT you can get the descriptions..
    and with MATNR from MARM you can get alternative UOM and the conversion rates.
    If you need help on MARM how to get the conversions please notify.
    Hope it helped
    Please reward if found useful
    Best Regards

  • Error in units of measurement conversion  "BOM"

    hello gurus gudmorning everybody
    i have problem in  project regarding the units   of  measurement conversion BOM
    this is the scenario: 1000 ft2(  BASE UNIT MEASUREMENT)  = 1ea (    SALES UNIT) ( 2bed room flat) it is a higher level item
    sub items are in EA  base unit measurement ex: like  one sofa one air conditioner etc instead of taking sale unit measurement of higher level item , its taking base unit mesurement of higher level item , .i.e instead of taking 1EA  2bhk = 1AC, 1 SOFA,   but is calculating 1000ft2( 2bhk)   = 1000ac, 1000sofa , plz help out to rectify the conversion
    thank you in  advance
    venkat

    Dear Venkat,
    Try with this
    Please maintain the alternative unit of measure in sub itemes master data at Additional tab like this
    in AC master data 1EA = 1AC and 1AC = 1EA 2BHK
    in Sofa master data 1EA = 1 Sofa and 1Sofa = 1EA 2BHK
    Now you try
    I hope this will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Table T000 was not relevant for conversion in BDLS log

    Hi All,
    I am getting the below message in BDLS log  while doing logical system system conversion with BDLS.
    "Table T000 was not relevant for conversion"
    Due to this I could see old logical system entry in SCC4 instead of New converted logical entry.
    (I've gone through the forums ,but didn't find solution)
    Any Idea why I am getting this message and I triggered BDLS from client 000.
    Regards,
    Srinivas Chapa.

    Already SCC4  entry for the client has old Logical system name.
    Ex:
    Client 500
    Logical System : <PRD>CLNT500
    I need this to be change to <QAS>CLNT500 after BDLS,but it is not happening after BDLs.
    Regards,
    Srinivas Chapa.

  • BDLS : Table T000 was not relevant for conversion

    Hello,
    After a system refresh ( homogeneous system copy in ECC6), we performed the post copy procedure.
    I ran the BDLS transaction, all the tables were converted fine, exept the table 000.
    I still have in transaction SCC4 the former logical systeank you in dam defined.
    I checked the BDLS job log and found the message :
    "Table T000 was not relevant for conversion"
    I don't underdtand why ? Is it the normal behaviour ?
    Table T000 is not excluded in BDLSC ...
    Thank you in advance for your help.
    Best Regards.

    I just found out that I launched the BDLS from the client 000.

  • ITEM IS NOT RELEVANT FOR BILLING WHILE DOING STO (VF01)

    HI
    I am getting an error while doing STO in CIN
    Item is not relevant for billing while doing VF01 STO proforma invoice JEX with delivery document type NL and item category NLN
    I searched the forum but not able to get an appropriate solution for this.
    Kindly revert me on the same
    Regards
    MANOJ

    Hi Manoj,
    The only reason for the error you are encountering are,
    A. The item category missing at the item level in the copying controls from delivery to JEX (billing type)
    Kindly check throughly and confirm,
    If it is there , then delete the configuration , i.e. item category from the copying controls and do it again.. Even if this do not resolve your issue, ask your technical team to debugg the billing document during creation and check.

  • Error:-Item is not relevant for billing

    Hi,
    Issue:-we have created a delivery with batch split material now while creating billing document with transaction VF01 it is giving error the item is not relevant for the billing.
    Can anybody tell me what is solution of this so that it won't give an error message.
    Regards,
    Dharmesh

    hello, friend.
    i believe this is somewhat standard behavior.  please confirm if this is what happened...
    1)  Sales Order
    Line Item 10
    Material RST100
    Quantity 100 units
    2)  Delivery Document
    Line Item 10
    Quantity 0
    Line Item 90001
    Quantity 40
    Line Item 90002
    Quantity 60
    3)  Billing Document
    Line item 10
    Quantity 0
    Billing Relevance [no amount]
    Line item 90001
    Quantity 40
    Billing amount [value displayed]
    Line item 90002
    Quantity 60
    Billing amount [value displayed]
    NOTE:  if you look at the document flow, you will see the billing relevance on sub-item level.
    we would appreciate your feedback.
    regards.

  • Line item not relevant for payment release

    Dear Expert,
    When I select payment block : 'Payment Request' in FB60. Error Message appear "Line item not relevant for payment release".
    I also have set payment block in master vendor and  OBB8.
    Can you tell me why the error message still appear?
    Kindly need your help
    Thanks and Regards,
    YL

    Do you have any workflow variant in place?
    Moreover, when you have already set the Payment block at Master level, you need not to fix it in transaction level.
    Vendor itself will not get paid until unless you remove the block option
    Thanks

  • Deliveries Showing as 'not relevant for billing' after Invoice Cancellation

    Hi,
    We have a plants abroad scenario, where the billing document (plants abroad invoice)  had to be cancelled because of wrong profit centres. After correction of data, when we are trying to invoice these deliveries, the system shows these as 'not relevant for billing'. Any idea what could have caused this and/ or how to correct this?
    Thanks in advance for the help,
    Regards,
    alok

    HI Alok,
    Could you please recheck the delivery document flow again, its only Billing document is cancelled or PGI reversal is also done or not.
    As per my knowledge G/L correction is nothing to do with 'not relevant for billing' or "relevant for billing".
    Try again there might be a case where delivery might have been reversed or billing document has not been cancelled or Document might have been blocked.
    Regards,
    Nagesh

Maybe you are looking for

  • Expdp impdp fails from 10g to 11g db version

    Hello folks, Export DB Version : 10.2.0.4 Import DB Version : 11.2.0.1 Export Log File Export: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wednesday, 03 November, 2010 2:19:20 Copyright (c) 2003, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved. Connected to: Oracle Databas

  • Using and editing another i-pod in my computer

    Hi, I am trying to put videos from my computer on my friend's i-pod, but I cant, I cant even select songs that are already in the i-pod. Is it possible to do that and how??

  • Iphoto clean up

    Before reading detailed instructions for Photoshop Elements 6, used the Adobe Bridge to open a number of my photo files. As a result when I attempted to open the photos in iPhoto I could not because they had become corrupted. I replaced the corrupted

  • New Mac Pro and Cores

    The way that I see the new Mac Pro being advertised is that it is one processor with 4,6,8,12 cores.  Is this saying that cores are as good as processors now.  For example, my current Mac Pro has 2 Xeon quad cores, with a total of 8.  It seems to me

  • I had Adobe CS3 products on my Macbook Pro. How do I prove this to get the Creative Cloud $29.99 membership price on my new iMac?

    I had Adobe CS3 products on my Macbook Pro. How do I prove this to get the Creative Cloud Complete $29.99 membership price on my new iMac?