Unity Connection not passing CallerID to CUCM over SIP Trunk

I'm trying to get CallerID working for Unity Connection Device Notification (and it seems everything else), however, when I run UC Remote Port Status Monitor and the Call-Out goes to CUCM for the Device Notification, no caller ID is presented to the CUCM SIP trunk.
06:06:02, New Call, CalledId=, RedirectingId=, Origin=16, Reason=1024, CallGuid=,
CallerName=, LastRedirectingId=, LastRedirectingReason=1024, PortDisplayName=LFC_CUCM-1-134,
[Origin=Unknown],[Reason=Unknown]
06:06:02,
Dialing '99254753'
06:06:32, Idle
06:06:33, Idle
Therefore, the out-going call to the PRI PSTN is:
10:59:01.005: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x5B03
        Sending Complete
        Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                Standard = CCITT
                Transfer Capability = Speech
                Transfer Mode = Circuit
                Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
        Channel ID i = 0xA98397
                Exclusive, Channel 23
        Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, N/A
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
        Called Party Number i = 0xC1, '9254753'
                Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)
*Dec 6 10:59:01.513: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- CALL_PR
I've looked through my SIP trunk on the CUCM side and for Inbound Calls, Connected Line ID and Presentation Name are set to "allowed" or "default" doesn't make a difference. RTMT Port Status also shows no "caller", so I'm thinking there is some way to set or allow the calling number on the Unity Connection (8.5) side.
Oddly enough, I also noticed that in Unity Connection> Telephony Integrations > Port Group, if I change the Contact Line Name from nothing to "Unity" (or whatever), the Q931 debug outbound doesn't show ANY "Calling Party Numer - = XXXXX" and the carrier throws out the BTN as the ANI.
10:46:00.837: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x5AFF
        Sending Complete
        Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                Standard = CCITT
                Transfer Capability = Speech
                Transfer Mode = Circuit
                Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
        Channel ID i = 0xA98397
                Exclusive, Channel 23
        Called Party Number i = 0xC1, '9254753'
                Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)
Any ideas on where/how CallerID comes from, on Unity Connection with a SIP integration?
THANKS!!
Mike.

I did not- my work around has been to put in a name for Contact Line Name under Port Group Basics Switch configuration in Unity Connection- this for some reason keeps CUCM from sending ANI TYPE/PLAN information in the Q931 message, and my carrier then sends a default ANI of the circuit's BTN. When I have time, I'll open up a TAC ticket.
Mike.

Similar Messages

Deploying unity connection at remote site with CUCM at central site

I am planning to deploy Unity connection at remote site while the CUCM is at central site only. Will appreciate of someone can shd some light on this, has anyone already deplyed same scenario , any specific requirements to take care of please ?
Thanks in advnace,
AB

AB,
Yes, having your Unity Connection server at a different location than your CUCM is supported.
I cannot really help you with specifc requirements as it largely depends on exactly how you intend to deploy it and what features you intend to enable. Clustering, Digital Networking, Unified Inbox, etc.. all have their own additional requirements the whole of which would not fit into a message board post.
However, specific bandwidth and latency requirements are listed in the "System Requirements for Cisco Unity Connection Release 8.X. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/requirements/8xcucsysreqs.html
The SRND and the System Requirements should get you on the right track. I would encourage you to read both documents fully and then come back with any specific design questions you may have.
-Steven

Cisco Unity Connection not relaying voicemails outside the organization

Hi all, we are running Cisco Unity Connection version: 8.6.2ES25.21900-25. It has been set up to accept voicemails for Exchange 2010 users (in other words email messages with WAV attachments) and deliver these to their inboxes; this works with no problem.
I have two users who would like to receive these emails at their outside account, however the messages are never sent. I have tried the following:
Changed the users corporate email addresses from "[email protected]" to "[email protected]"
Unchecked the option to "Generate SMTP Proxy Address From Corporate Email Address."
On the "Message Actions" page for their account I have configured voicemail and email to "Relay the message" and entered their external SMTP addresses.
Confirmed the smart host setup is OK (points to our Exchange 2010 CAS which has firewall rules in place to permit it to send mail outside the organization.
Confirmed the Exchange 2010 CAS will accept SMTP messages from the subnet the Unity Connection server resides in.
If I switch the user SMTP settings BACK to their original internal SMTP addresses for my company the messages are then immediately delivered properly to these addresses. This signifies to me that Unity is periodically trying to send these items but they just aren't going out. No sign of the messages in any user report I ran in Unity nor message tracking in Exchange.
I also tried setting up an Outlook rule to forward these voicemail messages to the recipients external addresses but this did not work and after doing some research I see that the way in which Unity delivers the messages to these recipients internally (via EWS) is the reason why. I wonder if this is the same reason these are not going out to their external SMTP addresses.
Thanks for any assistance provided!

Look at the transfer options for that particular user and make sure it's set to ring the phone, that configuration is PER user.
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

Unity Connection 8.6 LDAP or CUCM Import with german special characters called "Umlaut": ä, ö, ü

Hi,
for jabber 9.1 integration i sync'ed all users at Callmanager, Presence and Unity to our LDAP (MS AD). with CUCM and Presence (both 8.6.x), it works fine, just Unity Connection sync the Users from AD, but i cannot import Users with german special characters ä, ö, ü (i.E. German Name in LDAP-su: Müller).
Jabber 9.1 need for Voicemail Integration the AD Authentication. Know somebody, if there is an Workaraound or Fix ?
This is a general issue, with or without Jabber, with sync directly from AD, or indirectly through CUCM (sync'ed with AD)
thx and regards
Jacky

I located an identical defect (CSCts28455) that was closed as unreproducible. The defect references CSCtj73444 "Add support for UTF-8 password to LDAP and RADIUS/MSCHAP" which is added to 8.4.2 with the recommendation of RADIUS/MSCHAP or LDAP only for international character support. It would make sense to go to the latest in your current train (ie: 8.4.4.1.ED) and see if the issue remains. What you want to do appears to be supported.
Matthew

Unity Connection 8.6 compatibility with CUCM

Hi,
I am upgrading Unity Version 8.0.3 to 8.6, my current CUCM version is 8.0.2. According to following link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708
I will need to upgrade CUCM to 8.6 also, please confirm if this is the case, also can I upgrade to any CUCM 8.6 version available ?
thanks
hasrat

Hi Hasrat,
That doc just refers to the "tested" version but in fact any Unity Connection
version 2.1 or later will work with any CUCM version 4.1(3)or later
So you really don't need to upgrade CUCM at this time if you don't want.
Here's the clip;
Supported Version Combinations for Cisco Unity Connection and Cisco Unified Communications Manager
Cisco Unity Connection 2.x and Later
Any version of Cisco Unity Connection 2.x or later is supported for use with any version of Cisco Unified CM 4.1(3) or later.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/compatibility/matrix/cucsccpmtx.html
Cheers!
Rob
"May your heart always be joyful
May your song always be sung" - Bob Dylan

Unity Connection with a 2951 for analog to SIP?

Has anyone tested this out yet?
Avaya PBX with analog ports (from existing voicemails system server) to a 29XX router using FXO cards.
SIP to Unity Connection.
The diversion headers would come across correctly because these are the same analogs the existing voicemail server was using. The 29XX router would then have SIP dial peers that go to Unity Connection.
Im not sure if this is a supported configuration or if it will even work. In a pinch right now because PIMG lead times are waaaaay long.
Thanks!

Sounds like you are trying to connect in the wrong direction. If you are using a URL in remote connection of the pot object it would be a bi-directional connection. Did you try 'edit connections' from the GE object itself? Select the M register for the writable member and the pot object as the new logical connection. This method has two advantages - the remote PLC cannot change the current lookout setting for the register (which would certainly occur with a remote power fail). Also, you can use far more lookout object to control the PLC registers - objects like Expressions and LatchGates that have no remote URL position sources or writable data members.

Third Party Phone over SIP Trunk with CUCM 9.x

Hi all,
I have a problem where my Third Party SIP phones wont go over the SIP trunk configured in my CUCM 9.x cluster. My Cisco phones work fine and goes out the trunk. I have noticed a distinct difference in wireshark with the invite packets from Third Party SIP phones and the Cisco ones.
I have configured the SIP trunk in CUCM with the following route pattern (60.!#)and configured it with associated group and list. Heres the differense between the invite packets from Cisco and Third Party phones.
Cisco Phone: INVITE sip.60xxxx%23@ipadress
Third Party SIP Phone: INVITE sip:[email protected]
It seems the Cisco phones gets some extra configured the Third Party ones dont...
Thanks in advance for any help.
//Per

Thanks for the answer
Yeah i have DNS configured and i have the trunk pointed to a domain destination SRV record and like i said it works fine when calling from a Cisco phone. I tried changing the domain to an ip address but same result. I also changed the Plycom phone from being registered towards the domain of CUCM to an IP adress of CUCM and then the SIP INVITE messages in wireshark began to look kinda the same expet for the "%23" section but it still dont work.
When i look at the Real Time Data in RTMT the orig and final called from the cisco phone has stripped the 60 and forwared the rest of the number towards the correct domain for the SIP trunk.
When looking at the data from the Polycom phone the orig and final called data still contains the 60 prefix part and the called device name field is empty. The termination Cause Code is that the number requested is Unallocated/Unassigned..
In other words something is missing to get CUCM to strip 60 from the Polycom phones dialed number and send it towards the SIP trunk like it does when the Cisco phones call it.
Unfortunatley i dont have the meens to attach the trace...
Thanks again for any help/advice
With regards, Per.

CM Register over SIP Trunk

Hi guys,
would it be possible to allow sip users to register over the sip trunk on the Call Manager? or is this method not allowed?
Thanks.
Best regards

Hi Manish,
between sip client and webrtc gw -> ws and between webrtc gw and CM -> sip.
here are the sip messages.
both phones are registered, 9000 is a 7912 and 8080 is sip.
192.168.15.2 - CM
192.168.15.202 - webrtc
SEND: INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.15.202:10060;branch=z9hG4bK-1536671115;rport
From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=400660433
To: <sip:[email protected]>
Contact: <sip:[email protected]:10060;ws-src-ip=192.168.251.105;ws-src-port=50731;ws-src-proto=ws;transport=udp>
Call-ID: df093113-7c32-2a2f-2372-8af2dfbe9235
CSeq: 1875466830 INVITE
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 978
Max-Forwards: 70
Authorization: Digest username="8080",realm="ccmsipline",nonce="gHqGqDWK4zTzv6Ijl6ixW58AK/Gm4yC6",uri="sip:[email protected]",response="352cb2e17e36b32ee4e0d52443d0a106",algorithm=MD5
User-Agent: webrtc2sip Media Server 2.6.0
v=0
o=doubango 1983 678901 IN IP4 192.168.15.202
s=-
c=IN IP4 192.168.15.202
t=0 0
a=tcap:1 RTP/SAVPF RTP/SAVP RTP/AVPF
m=audio 58690 RTP/AVP 8 0 101
c=IN IP4 192.168.15.202
a=ptime:20
a=minptime:1
a=maxptime:255
a=silenceSupp:off - - - -
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000/1
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000/1
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000/1
a=fmtp:101 0-16
a=acap:1 crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:1YfBfgbhIdMB6YVtyZgJqc77QPHwm9o42aEPbkHD
a=acap:2 crypto:2 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 inline:fujGVOi70hQnKkeUimcFUw2bH3ajZ2iW0xKy5Nrw
a=pcfg:1 t=1 a=1,2
a=pcfg:2 t=2 a=1,2
a=pcfg:3 t=3
a=sendrecv
a=rtcp-mux
a=ssrc:4034073057 cname:c08c56217e96dbc1e8234373eb5d2fcc
a=ssrc:4034073057 mslabel:6994f7d1-6ce9-4fbd-acfd-84e5131ca2e2
a=ssrc:4034073057 label:doubango@audio
a=ice-ufrag:uaektHZ6KFVn1fw
a=ice-pwd:HAj21nuOrDmIKl3ANXTc3K
a=candidate:tWR5PLw1x 1 udp 2130706431 192.168.15.202 58690 typ host
a=candidate:tWR5PLw1x 2 udp 2130706430 192.168.15.202 58691 typ host
RECV:SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.15.202:10060;branch=z9hG4bK-1536671115;rport
From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=400660433
To: <sip:[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:26:05 GMT
Call-ID: df093113-7c32-2a2f-2372-8af2dfbe9235
CSeq: 1875466830 INVITE
Allow-Events: presence
Content-Length: 0
RECV:SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.15.202:10060;branch=z9hG4bK-1536671115;rport
From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=400660433
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=856401750
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:26:05 GMT
Call-ID: df093113-7c32-2a2f-2372-8af2dfbe9235
CSeq: 1875466830 INVITE
Allow-Events: presence
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="ccmsipline", nonce="gHqGqDWK4zTzv6Ijl6ixW58AK/Gm4yC6", algorithm=MD5
Content-Length: 0
SEND: ACK sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.15.202:10060;branch=z9hG4bK-1536671115;rport
From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=400660433
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=856401750
Call-ID: df093113-7c32-2a2f-2372-8af2dfbe9235
CSeq: 1875466830 ACK
Content-Length: 0
Max-Forwards: 70
Receiving SIP o/ WebSocket message: ACK sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/WS df7jal23ls0d.invalid;branch=z9hG4bKZEk81zTwfVde8oImts6ZHiTzchfBWh1N;rport
From: "8080"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=XFKqC4zu0S9QfzzMzQ4u
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=1464334432
Call-ID: ecc84fa2-3de3-d953-527f-5e7515cabca3
CSeq: 29519 ACK
Content-Length: 0
Route: <sip:192.168.15.2:5060;lr;sipml5-outbound;transport=udp>
Max-Forwards: 70
Thanks.

NICE recorder - one way or garbled audio over SIP trunk.

Customer with CUCM 10.5.2 trying to integrate with a NICE recording solution. Everything configured per NICE documentation and rechecked that several times with the NICE vendor. However, if calling to/from the PSTN or legacy Nortel PBX to a Cisco 78xx or IP Communicator soft phone - we get one-way audio pushed out the SIP trunk to the NICE system. If it's a Cisco to Cisco phone call - the audio is garbled.
Has anyone experienced this issue with this type of integration - or the same issue with a SIP trunk to the CUCM to another system at all? We're at a loss here.
Thank you.

This document should help you:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk698/technologies_tech_note09186a008009484b.shtml

Unity Connection - Certificate from cucm no more trusted for encrypted calls after upgrade to 10.5(1)

Hello Support Community,
i have a strange problem:
after upgrading my cucm and unity connection from 9.1 to 10.5(1) enctrypted calls are no more working.
situation 1: CUCM is down, Subscriber is up: Encrypted call to Unity Connection work correctly
situation 2: CUCM is up: Encrypted Calls to Unity Connection not working.
i get the following Info in the log for the Connection Conversion Manager:
19:35:21.053 |15865,,,MiuGeneral,25,Invalid Certificate: Received Certificate -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIID8zCCAtugAwIBAgIQc/fBdUz1Zdh4CXhcPqGVuDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADBw
MQswCQYDVQQGEwJERTELMAkGA1UEChMCSVQxGzAZBgNVBAsTEkhlbGxnYXRlIFRl
XD0oD9d5MQ==
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
doesn't match with stored Certificate: -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIIC2DCCAkGgAwIBAgIIJWCm4bSdt+kwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAw
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
so where does Unity Connection cache this certificate and how can i delete/replace it?
the cert shown in the logs is the one from cucm: ("CallManager"), i recreated it through cucm os administration, now i see the same error message on unity connection for the new recreated certificate.

Actually It doesn't. It says he's on a MacBook. I don't know all the different types of Macs. I was having a ton of problems with iChat. I opened DMZ to my computer, knocked down all firewalls etc and left everything exposed, still with bad results. A few weeks ago my power supply went out on my D-Link. I bought a linksys. Since I'd left all firewalls off I figured it couldn't be the router. I power cycled everything n the netork, still no luck. Today I bought a universal Power supply and started up my D-Link Router. Everything worked perfectly. My wifes computer - a laptop running Tiger worked fine with the Linksys and did my machine before the Leopard upgrade. Now that I've got the D-Link online everythings working.
Message was edited by: graphico
Message was edited by: graphico

Unity Connection drops

Hello,
I was hoping to get some ideas on how to troubleshoot this.
We just finished a migration and 'go-live' from Unity 7.0(2) to Unity Connection 8.5. Our existing CUCM is 7.1.5 (this did not change with the Unity migration). Seemingly randomly audio will drop with functions related to Unity Connection. This includes, trying to leave a message, listenting to a message, or a voice menu. This happens whether it's an internal (CUCM) or external (PSTN) call. However, when it happens internally on our 7940 phones, there is a "Temp Fail" message displayed.
Unity Connection is running on VMware ESXi 4.1, on a supported HP BL460c server. The OVA installed without problem and Unity Connection installed passing it's hardware verification routine. Unity Connection is the ONLY virtual machine running on this hardware and we plan to keep it that way. This is the first time we've virtualized a Cisco product on VMware, however, we have a couple hundred other servers already on VMware, so VMware itself is not new to us. Our Unity 7.0(2) system ran on one of Cisco's HP MCS platforms and was not virtualized. Also, Unity Connection is currently a stand-alone; it is not installed in a cluster.
Admittedly I am very new to "Unity Connection", however, several years of "Unity" and CUCM under my belt. Can anyone provide some ideas on where to start looking for this problem?
Thanks,
-Mike

Barry,
I'll be honest, I don't know exactly what version we ended up with, here's what "About" reports:
Cisco Unity Connection version: 8.5.1.10000-206
We were having a series of failures in our Unity 7.0(2), apparently as a result of us moving to Windows 2008r2 domain controllers and/or our move from Exchange 2003 to 2010. So our vendor's engineer came over and slapped in the latest copy he could find and fast-tracked the license migration process. My actual 'real' copy of the software was only just order iva the PUT tool the day our Unity crapped out (yesterday).
We got the problem resolved. It was in the VMware config as Adam suggests below. But we've got some other less major oddities that RTMT may help with. I appreciate the suggestion.
Cheers!
-Mike

Cisco unity connection 8.6.1 / VMware workstation 10.0

Hi
Downloaded the iso file UCSInstall_UCOS_8.6.1.20000-1.sgn.iso to install Cisco unity connection.
Downloads Home
Products
Unified Communications
Unified Communications Applications
Messaging
Cisco Unity Connection
Cisco Unity Connection Version 8.6
Unified Communications Manager / Cisco Unity Connection Updates-8.6(1a)
Installing the same in VM Ware workstation 10.0, but not getting the selection for unity connection. Its automatically installs CUCM 8.6.1.
Please let me know any specific vmware settings to install unity connection 8.6.1.

You are not getting UCxN option because your VMware configuration is not complying with the minimum requirement to install Unity connection.
If you are not installing through OVA template then look at the VM configuration minimum requirement section of that particular version from the link shared by Aman.
Thanks
Manish

Cisco unity connection question

Hi all, I dont have subscriber in my test environment but want know what happens with this two scenarios.
Can we add a mailbox in sub when pub is up?
Can you add a mailboxin sub when pub is down?
I am sure that when pub is down we cannot add a mailbox, but want to make sure
Thanks,
Uday

Hi Uday,
The Cluster in Unity Connection acts differently than a CUCM cluster, so the answers to your question are;
Yes & Yes
How a Cluster Works in Cisco Unity Connection
Revised May 2009
The Cisco Unity Connection cluster feature provides high availability voice messaging through two Connection servers that are configured in a cluster. Under normal conditions, the Connection servers are both active so that:
•The cluster can be assigned a DNS name that is shared by the Connection servers.
•Clients such as email applications and the web tools available through the Cisco Personal Communications Assistant (PCA) can connect to either Connection server.
•Phone systems can send calls to either Connection server.
•Incoming phone traffic load is balanced between the Connection servers by the phone system, PIMG/TIMG units, or other gateways that are required for the phone system integration.
Each server in the cluster is responsible for handling a share of the incoming calls for the cluster (answering phone calls and taking messages). The server with Primary status is responsible for the following functions:
•Homing and publishing the database and message store, which are both replicated to the other server.
•Sending message notifications and MWI requests (the Connection Notifier service is activated).
•Sending SMTP notifications and VPIM messages (the Connection Message Transfer Agent service is activated).
When one of the servers stops functioning (for example, when it is shut down for maintenance), the remaining server assumes responsibility for handling all incoming calls for the cluster. The remaining server also assumes responsibility for the database and message store, which are both replicated to the other server when the connection and its functionality are restored.
When the server that stopped functioning is able to resume its normal functions and is activated, it resumes responsibility for handling its share of incoming calls for the cluster.
To monitor the status of the servers, the Connection Server Role Manager service runs in Cisco Unity Connection Serviceability on both servers. This service performs the following functions:
•Starts the applicable services on each server, depending on server status.
•Determines whether critical processes (such as voice message processing, database replication, and message store replication) are functioning normally.
•Initiates changes to server status when the server with Primary status is not functioning or when critical services are not running.
Note the following limitations when the publisher server is not functioning:
•If the Connection cluster is integrated with an LDAP directory, directory synchronization does not occur, although authentication continues to work when only the subscriber server is functioning. When the publisher server is functioning again, directory synchronization resumes.
•If a Digital Network includes the Connection cluster, directory updates do not occur, although messages continue to be sent to and from the cluster when only the subscriber server is functioning. When the publisher server is functioning again, directory updates resume.
About the Publisher Server
The first Cisco Unity Connection server that is configured in the cluster is the publisher server. The Cluster Management page in Cisco Unity Connection Serviceability identifies the publisher server.
The publisher server assumes responsibility for publishing the database and message store when the cluster is functioning normally.
When the publisher server does not have Primary status (for example, when the administrator manually changes the status of the other server to Primary, which automatically changes the status of the publisher server to Secondary), the other server assumes responsibility for publishing the database and message store.
The publisher server cannot be removed from the cluster.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/cluster_administration/guide/7xcuccag020.html#wp1063695
Cheers!
Rob
"Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen

CUCM SIP Trunk Unable to find a device handler for the request received

I have a lab running CUCM 10.0 that has a SIP trunk to a VCS. Previously I was able to place and receive calls across the trunk, but now I can only place calls, not receive. I did recently upgrade to 10.5, but I really can't recall if it ever worked after the upgrade. The error I'm getting in CUCM is
Unable to route message, Cannot find the SIP Device with Name=192.1.1.61, Source Port=5060, IpAddress Type=0
This confuses me, because the destination IP/port of the VCS SIP trunk is 192.1.1.61:5060. The trunk on CUCM show as up and the Zone in VCS shows as up. What is going on?
Thanks, Mike

I figured it out. Long story short, it was a port mismatch. When you configure Mobile Remote Access on the Expressway Core it creates a SIP trunk from Expressway to CUCM using port 5060. If you then create another SIP trunk from the same Expressway to CUCM for firewall traversal or external calling, you must use a different port. The port used for the zone in Expressway must match the SIP security profile used on the CUCM side SIP trunk. So I had created another SIP Security profile in CUCM with port 5062 for this purpose. However, the VCS in question that I was working with was only being used for FW traversal, so I used 5060 as the port on the VCS side, but I applied the SIP security profile that used 5062 on the CUCM side. That's why CUCM was throwing that "device not found" error. Once I changed the Security Profile to match the same port used on VCS (5060) all was well. Sorry for the long winded answer. Hope it helps someone else down the road.

Cisco Unity Connection 8.6 not getting CLID information from CUCM 8.6

Hello,
Currently Running:
Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.6.2
Cisco Unity Connection 8.6.2
Problem:
when any outside caller leaves a voicemail, the caller number information is not being sent to unity.
example, I call with my cell phone, 817.555.1234 to my Cisco 7940 phone and it shows the CLID information that i am calling with. iDivert to voice mail, Leave a message. Playback message and just the default message information from Cisco Unity.
we currently upgraded from CUCM 6.1.3 and Unity 5. before i could press 9 and get the caller information.
I have viewed the "Playback Message Settings" and selected "After Playing Each Message, Play" and selected Sender's Information. and also selected "Include Extension and Sender's ANI"
upon playing the VoiceMail after the message i get the default message "From Cisco Unity Connection Messaging System"
I also have the message relaying to my E-mail and I get the same in the subject line.
"Message from Cisco Unity Connection Messaging System (Unknown extension)"
This tends to be a big deal with the Sales team as customers will call and say "Call me back"
But any Internal Calls show the correct information, proper greeting, extension information even on the relay to e-mail.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
Tim

Found another post that referenced Cisco Bug ID CSCti37610.
CUC plays message is from Unity Connection Messaging system
Symptom:Before message playback, Unity Connection plays the message is from Unity Connection Messaging System instead sender's ANI
Conditions:Problem was observed on Unity Connection cluster and appropriate services are not rebooted after changing the SMTP domain name
Workaround:
Restart the Unity Connection servers
It should have been fixed in 8.5 but we did change the SMTP domain name on 8.6 and now see the problem. Will schedule a reboot and see if the issue goes away.

Unity Connection not passing CallerID to CUCM over SIP Trunk

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for