Unity connections 9.1 "port stuck with call"

            I am seeing this message in the error log: %UC_UCEVNT-3-EvtMiuPortStuckWithCallinfoOnly:   for a number of  ports. . When I look into the log some of these ports have ben up for a month .
the message is cleared by restarting the port,
This stuck port problem has been around for a long time we had it in ver 7.1, is there any way of making a port reset if it has been stuck on a call for say 24 hours?

Hello chrbradf1,
You can set the amount of time for the watchdog to generate a log when the port would be considered locked, but there is no automatic way of restarting them on the CUC perspective neither on CUCM, there is also no provisioning for Tcl scripting therefore you will have to restart them manually.
Watchdog is under: Cisco Unity Connection Administration> System Settings> Advanced> Telephonny> Port Watchdog Threshold in Minutes.
Port Watchdog Threshold in Minutes
Enter the time, in minutes, that a port can be off hook before it is considered to be locked. When a port reaches this threshold, Cisco Unity Connection logs an error. To review errors, see the Real-Time Monitoring Tool. We recommend a setting greater than 30 minutes.
Default setting: 240 minutes.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/gui_reference/guide/8xcucgrg110.html
Also consider that maximum time is 240000 minimum is 0 and value has to be integer.
Examples:
Value specified (111111111) exceeds the maximum allowable value (24000).
Value specified (0.1111) is not an integer value
Value specified (-1111) is below the minimum allowable value (0).
-David

Similar Messages

  • Unity Connection Voice Mail ports

    Hi experts
    I hava simple question.
    I have a UCS M3BE server with 2 CPU, as per the link http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/9x/supported_platforms/9xcucspl.html#wp810181 with 2 No's of CPU it supports only 100 ports per Virtual Machine and for the cluster it supports 200 ports.so in the CUCM Voice Mail Port Wizard i shld put figures 200 or 100??,
    i think i shld put voice mail ports 100 on CUCM with name CiscoUM1-VI with 100 ports when selecting ports on CUC-publisher
    then again creating voice mail ports 100 on CUCM with name CiscoUM2-VI with 100 ports when selecting ports on CUC-subscriber
    Thanks

    Hi Jack,
    Can you try installing the cop file from the following link
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/collaboration-voice-video/unified-comm-application/blog/2013/04/17/unity-connection-911-unable-to-create-more-than-8-ports
    Although this bug fix is for installations with one CPU you can give it a try.
    HTH
    Manish

  • Unity Connection 8.5 single inbox with Exchange 2003 - Access denied

    Hi,
    I'm using CUCMBE 8.5.1.12900-7 Unrestricted. i'm following Unified Messaging Guide for Cisco Unity Connection Release 8.5 and Later for configuring single inbox. I have successfully setup and tested unified messaging service when I subscribe this service to a particular user and test it, I get following error:
    Issue: Failed accessing [email protected] on 192.168.0.10
    Recommendations: Some possible reasons for 401: Incorrect service account name or password. Service account password expired. Proper permissions not granted to service account. Exchange mailbox uninitialized.
    Details: HTTP status=[401 Unauthorized] diagnostic=[Bad response from server, HTTP code returned: 401] url=[http://192.168.0.10/exchange/
    [email protected]] request=[<?xml version="1.0"?> <D:propfind xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:fh="urn:schemas:httpmail:" xmlns:h="http://schemas.microsoft.com/repl/"> <D:prop> <fh:msgfolderroot/> </D:prop> </D:propfind> ] response=[<html><head><title>Error</title></head><body>Error: Access is Denied.</body></html>]
    I have verified above mentioned recommendations but no such issue exists. Any ideas?

    Hi Muhammad,
    I am having exactly the same issue in configuring sinlgle inbox with unity connection 8.6 and exchange 2003. I have checked everything but no result. Could you please help in configuring?
    Thanks
    The validation results for the  user unified messaging service account [email protected] with service  E2K302 are the following:
    Service "E2K302":  AuthenticationMode=NTLM [use HTTP] Server=[E2K3-02.chelloit1.local]  Type=[Exchange 2003] Username=[chelloit1.local\agokharu]
    Failed accessing  [email protected] on E2K3-02.chelloit1.local
    Some possible reasons for 401:  Incorrect service account name or password. Service account password expired.  Proper permissions not granted to service account. Exchange mailbox  uninitialized.
    HTTP status=[401 Unauthorized]  diagnostic=[Bad response from server, HTTP code returned: 401]  url=[http://E2K3-02.chelloit1.local/exchange/[email protected]]  request=[<?xml version="1.0"?> http://schemas.microsoft.com/repl/">   ]  response=[ErrorError:  Access is Denied.]

  • Unity Connection 8.5 Single Inbox with Verisign Certificates

    Hi,
    I am trying to connect CUC 8.5.1.12900-7 to Exchange 2010 using Basic authentication with SSL.
    I am having problems when I get to the test user stage and think the problem may be caused by certificates.
    To obtain the certificates that I have installed on CUC I got one of the users to connect to OWA and then exported the certificates associated with the connection and then loaded then onto CUC - is this the right way to do it? - there does not seem to be any documentation that covers this in detail.
    Can anyone point me in the right direction or at least let me know how to troubleshoot the problem?
    Thanks

    You want to export the root CA certificate from OWA and import it to both the tomcat-trust and connection-trust stores. When I did this last week on 8.6(1)a I did not have to restart Tomcat although that has been required in the past. You can spot the root CA certificate by choosing the Certificate Path tab, selecting the highest certificate in the chain, opening it, select the Details tab, and click Copy to File. When you save it you will want the Base-64 encoded file and need to manually change the file extension from .CRT to .PEM.
    Additionally, you can rule SSL out by unchecking the Validate Certificates for Exchange Servers checkbox. This will allow the SSL session even if the certificate fails validation.
    Other issues I have seen:
    The permissions granted to the Exchange user did not delegate to that user/mailstore or you accidentally missed a step.
    The AutoDiscover folder in IIS is not allowing Basic authentication. The Exchange architect I worked with last week wouldn't enable this so I ended up using NTLM authentication instead since both EWS and AutoDiscover were allowing Integrated WIndows Auth.

  • How do i connect my 24 ports switch with e3000

    hello everybody, i know its a newbies question....but there's always a begining...
    I just bought a e3000 and I have a 24 ports switch. I would like to plug more than 8 pc...how do I proced ? I used to have a dlink router and just plug a cat5e from the dlint to the switch ... but it doesn't work with the e3000
    thanx in advance....
    Nay

    It's an unmanaged switch. All you should have to do it plug it into a lan port of the router. Doesn't matter which port on the switch, there is no configuration of the switch.
    What do you mean by not working? Are the link lights on? You aren't getting DHCP on clients on the switch or what's happening? 

  • How can I use the Unity Connection 10.5 Greetings Administrator with e.164 CallHandler extensions

    We recently upgraded to CUCM 10.5 and CUC 10.5 using an e.164 dial plan throughout. One snafu that has surfaced is how do people access a CallHandler via the Greetings Administrator TUI if the CallHandler extension begins with a '+' character? Pressing and holding * does not seem to work. Any ideas?

    We recently upgraded to CUCM 10.5 and CUC 10.5 using an e.164 dial plan throughout. One snafu that has surfaced is how do people access a CallHandler via the Greetings Administrator TUI if the CallHandler extension begins with a '+' character? Pressing and holding * does not seem to work. Any ideas?

  • Queing in Unity connection 8.6

    We are Using Unity connection 8.6, Configured a Auto attendant for DID number I need to do calls in queuing is it possible to configure queing in CUC 8.6? 

    Hi,
    Please check the Call handler section of Unity Connection 8.x admin guide
    With call holding, when the phone is busy, Unity Connection can ask callers to hold. Each caller on hold uses a Unity Connection port and a phone system port, and therefore the total number of callers that can be holding in the queue at any one time is limited by the number of available ports.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/administration/guide/8xcucsagx/8xcucsag060.html
    HTH
    Manish

  • Unity Connection 8.5.1 MWI issue with French Locale

    Hi There,
    I am experiencing issues with MWI while using french locale on CUC 8.5.1. While, it works perfectly fine with English (US).
    CUCM version is 8.0.3. Any ideas will be much appreciated.
    Regards,
    Sami

    Hi Armin,
    You could be seeing this behavior due to this bug;
    Incorrect locale version cause VM outage
    CSCtq97240
    Symptom:
    Unity connection 8.5.1 installed with locales may experience the following issues
    1.When users try to leave message ,they get the fail safe message
    2.Sometimes they are able to leave message , message doesnt get delivered and no MWI
    Conditions:
    When Locale version ES 24 is installed on UC 8.5(1) [ ES 16] or less
    Workaround:
    please downgrade the locale version to ES 16  if you have 8.5(1)SU1 or use US English language.
    Though the Release notes of 8.5(1)
    http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074314/49311/851su1cucrm.pdf
    clearly  mentions about the compatibility , Many customers think its good for  them to install the latest locale ES and hence end with this condition.
    This is the compatibility matrix for locales
    ========================================
    a) No locales are available for Connection 8.5(1) base version only.
    b) Locale SU1 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)SU1.
    c) Locale ES 24 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)ES 17 to ES 36 only.
    d) Locale ES 24 is not tested for Connection 8.5(1)ES 37 to ES46.
    e) Locale 8.5(1)SU2 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)SU2 only. Not all locales available as of now
    f)  Locale 8.5(1)SU3 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)SU3 only. Only Japanese is available as of now.
    g)  Locale 8.5(1)ES72 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)ES72 only. Only Brazilian-Portuguese is available as of now.
    Cheers!
    Rob
    "Your life is worth much more than gold." 
    - Bob Marley

  • Unity Connection not passing CallerID to CUCM over SIP Trunk

    I'm trying to get CallerID working for Unity Connection Device Notification (and it seems everything else), however, when I run UC Remote Port Status Monitor and the Call-Out goes to CUCM for the Device Notification, no caller ID is presented to the CUCM SIP trunk.
    06:06:02, New Call, CalledId=,  RedirectingId=,  Origin=16,  Reason=1024,  CallGuid=, 
    CallerName=,  LastRedirectingId=,  LastRedirectingReason=1024,  PortDisplayName=LFC_CUCM-1-134,
    [Origin=Unknown],[Reason=Unknown]
    06:06:02,
    Dialing '99254753'
    06:06:32, Idle
    06:06:33, Idle
    Therefore, the out-going call to the PRI PSTN is:
    10:59:01.005: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x5B03
            Sending Complete
            Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                    Standard = CCITT
                    Transfer Capability = Speech
                    Transfer Mode = Circuit
                    Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
            Channel ID i = 0xA98397
                    Exclusive, Channel 23
            Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, N/A
                    Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
            Called Party Number i = 0xC1, '9254753'
                    Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)
    *Dec  6 10:59:01.513: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- CALL_PR
    I've looked through my SIP trunk on the CUCM side and for Inbound Calls, Connected Line ID and Presentation Name are set to "allowed" or "default" doesn't make a difference. RTMT Port Status also shows no "caller", so I'm thinking there is some way to set or allow the calling number on the Unity Connection (8.5) side.
    Oddly enough, I also noticed that in Unity Connection> Telephony Integrations > Port Group, if I change the Contact Line Name from nothing to "Unity" (or whatever), the Q931 debug outbound doesn't show ANY "Calling Party Numer - = XXXXX" and the carrier throws out the BTN as the ANI.
    10:46:00.837: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x5AFF
            Sending Complete
            Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                    Standard = CCITT
                    Transfer Capability = Speech
                    Transfer Mode = Circuit
                    Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
            Channel ID i = 0xA98397
                    Exclusive, Channel 23
            Called Party Number i = 0xC1, '9254753'
                    Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)
    Any ideas on where/how CallerID comes from, on Unity Connection with a SIP integration?
    THANKS!!
    Mike.

    I did not- my work around has been to put in a name for Contact Line Name under Port Group Basics Switch configuration in Unity Connection- this for some reason keeps CUCM from sending ANI TYPE/PLAN information in the Q931 message, and my carrier then sends a default ANI of the circuit's BTN. When I have time, I'll open up a TAC ticket.
    Mike.

  • Unity Connection Upgrade from 8.6.2 to 9.1 latest version

    Hi,
    Am planning to Upgrade my CUC(Unity Connection) from 8.6.2 to 9.1 latest version, having my Call manager in the same version 8.6.2. I will upgrade my Call Manager from 8.6.2 to 9.X later.
    Hope i can upgrade my CUC first.
    I need some info like,
    1) Am not getting the image to download which can upgrade from 8.6.2 to 9.1 latest version directly. Should i have to move to 9.0 first and then to 9.1 ??
    2) Is their any pre cautions need to be taken care/ well known issues during the upgrade.
    3) Also, hope licensing get migrated automatically (no need to have extra efforts)
    4) Advantages of Moving to 9.x wrt to features compared to 8.6.
    Pls suggest.
    Thanks
    Jagadish G

    Hi Jagadish,
    Just to answer few :
    you can downlaod the image from below link under UC Applications amd messaging:
    http://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=284603371&flowid=45680&softwareid=282074295&release=8.4(1)&relind=AVAILABLE&rellifecycle=&reltype=latest
    Supported Version Combinations for Cisco Unity Connection 2.x and Later with Cisco Unified Communications Manager
    Cisco Unity Connection
    Cisco Unified Communications Manager
    2.x and Later
    9.1(2), 9.1(1), 9.0(1),8.6(2),8.6(1),8.5(1),8.0(x), 7.1(x), 7.0(x), 6.1(x), 6.0(x), 5.1(x), 5.0(x), 4.3(x), 4.2(x), 4.1(3)
    No new functionality has been introduced in UCXN 9.1(2)
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/9x/release/notes/912cucrn.html
    for licensing on ELM, u need to get in touch with [email protected] take backup of UCXN 8.6 before initiating upgrades.
    regds,
    aman

  • Unity Connection 8.5.1 Unable to store message

    Hi,
    We're running a Unity Connection 8.5.1 cluster and have installed 3 extra languages (Dutch,French and German).
    When a call gets to Unity and the settings of the user are such that unity answers with the system default language (English), the message can be stored.
    But when the user is setup to answer the caller in any of the added languages, the messages cannot be stored.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Jeroen

    Hi Jeroen,
    You may be seeing this Bug;
    CSCtq97240
    Interpreting the bug                                             ▼
    Incorrect locale version cause VM outage
    Symptom:Unity connection 8.5.1 installed with locales may experience the following issues1.When users try to leave message ,they get the fail safe message
    2.Sometimes they are able to leave message , message doesnt get delivered
    Conditions:When Locale version ES 24 is installed on UC 8.5(1) [ ES 16] or less
    Workaround:please downgrade the locale version to ES 16  or use US English language
    Locale ES 24 is meant only for UC 8.5(1)ES17 or later.Though the Release notes of 8.5(1
    http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074314/49311/851su1cucrm.pdfclearly mentions about the compatibility , Many customers think its good for them to install the latest locale ES and hence end with this condition.This defect is just to track the issue and may be we can add a warning in the locale download page in CCO
    Related Bug
    Status
    Fixed
    Severity
    5 - cosmetic
    Last Modified
    Jul 18,2011
    Product
    Cisco Unity Connection
    Platform
    Dependent
    Technology
    nav
    1st Found-in
    8.5
    Fixed-in
    Cheers!
    Rob

  • Single Inbox on Unity Connection 8.5 and Exchange 2003 SP2

    Hi,
    We have Unity Connection 8.5 (with SU2) and Exchange 2003 SP2
    We want to setup the Single Inbox feature that works well with Exchange 2007 and 2010, but my customer is running Exchange 2003 SP2.
    We met all of the requirements outlined in: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/requirements/8xcucsysreqs.html#wp459928
    I configure a new "Unified Messaging Services" profile for Exchange using Exchange 2003 and enabled for Single Inbox.  When I run "Test" it displays the following errors (other validation is successfully)
    The service port for IMAP is not functioning.      
    The system failed to connect to the server with a socket connection through port beatles.clubone.com:993. The error is error:0200206F:system library:connect:Connection refused. Refer to the tomcat log file for more details. If you are using secure connection, confirm that SSL is enabled on the server.
    Why is it trying to connect using IMAP, that wasn't the case when I used for Exchange 2007 or 2010 when IMAP was not enabled.
    Is there something else I'm missing for configuration with Unity Connection to support Single Inbox with Exchange 2003 SP2?
    Thank you!
    -rya

    Hi Rya,
    I just wanted to add my +5 vote for this great catch by Aaron (nice work "A")
    If you are going to upgrade to Unity Connection 8.6
    Check out this great doc from Saurabh for the refresh upgrade notes to 8.6.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/collaboration-voice-video/unified-comm-application/blog/2011/08/11/checklist-before-upgrading-to-unity-connection-86
    Cheers!
    Rob
    "Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen

  • Unity Connection Operator Transfer to UCCX Trigger

    I have a customer with the following scenario...
    A caller calls (either directly or through transfer) to a personal line, and is transferred to voicemail.
    The '0' option is set to transfer to Operator on the Unity Connections system.
    They want the caller to be transferred to the UCCX queue if they press '0'.
    Here is what is configured:
    The Operator Call Handler has Transfer Rules set to transfer to Extension (2504) and Release to Switch.
    2504-Internal is a Translation Pattern to 5200-IPCC which is the UCCX Trigger.
    Here is what happens:
    I call the personal line, and get diverted to Voicemail.
    I begin hearing the personal greeting, and press '0'.
    I hear the 'Please wait while I transfer your call' prompt'.
    I hear the initial prompt of the Call Center script.
    I begin hearing the in queue hold message while waiting on an agent.
    At this point we would think all is fine, and that things are working as desired.
    However, some timeout occurs, and the call reverts to the Unity Connection handler.
    I hear that 'The Operator is not available' and the call follows the Transfer Rule, and re-transfers me to the UCCX script.
    Unless an agent can answer my call quickly enough, I do not remain in queue but bounce back to Unity and then transfer again to UCCX as a fresh call in queue.
    Any thoughts on where to look, or a method to troubleshoot this scenario would be appreciated.

    Does your AEF script impose a two-second delay prior to the Accept step when the call is coming from CXN? There is a JTAPI race condition that can cause this if the MIVR engine answers the call immediately vs. waiting two seconds or half a ring.

  • Unity Connection 9 Failover Not Working

    Just built 2 Unity Connection 9 in Pub/Sub configuration.  Call Manager version is still 8.
    Call Manager configuration:
    1 line group, 1 hunt list, and 1 hunt pilot
    1 voicemail pilot and 1 voicemail profile
    64 voicemail ports (32 ports per Unity Connection server) (all ports are registered)
    Unity Connection configuration:
    1 publisher and 1 subscriber
    1 phone system
    1 port group (64 port count, 32 for publisher and 32 for subscriber)
    Cluster configuration is set to change status when publisher fails
    Publisher takes calls without a problem.  But when publisher stops taking calls, subscriber does not take the calls (busy signal).
    To test if the issue might be on the call manager, I changed all port settings in Unity to point to the subscriber.  Subscriber take the calls.
    I changed 2 ports to point only to publisher, publisher takes the calls.  But when publisher stops taking calls, subscriber does not take the calls (busy signal).
    It seems like I cannot split the ports to both servers.  Am I missing something?
    Has anyone encountered this issue?  Any info is appreciated.
    Thank you!

    Problem solved! 
    In Call Manager, I created a second line group for the subscriber ports.  Added the second line group to the hunt list.  Set the LG for the subscriber in the hunt list as first and publisher as second.  This way, all calls will go to the subscriber server first.  
    In Unity Connection, I created a second port group then added the ports and made sure they are registered in CM.
    Tested failover by stopping taking calls on each server and it works!

  • Unity Connection 8.5 Unified Messaging MWI

    Hi Guys,
         I just configured Unity Connection 8.5 Single Inbox with Exchange 2007. Everything is working fine, except the MWI goes off as soon as the Exchange gets the message. Is this the expected behaviour?
         I need that the MWI stays ON until the user reads the message in Outlook. Is that possible?
    Thanks! 

    Not sure if it applies here but, if you aren't moving it to another folder in your Outlook, try looking at this....
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/collaboration-voice-video/unified-comm-application/blog/2011/03/02/cisco-unity-exchange-2007-disclaimer-transport-rule-causes-mwi-to-fail
    Let me know if you have a disclaimer setup on Exchange 2007 etc.
    Thanks!
    Tray

Maybe you are looking for