Unity Connections - Miu Errors

Opening a TAC case but if anyone has anything...Basically, I just ran Bulk Edit and changed the Error Greeting "After Greeting Action" for just ONE Class of Service.
As soon as we did this, Unity Connections completely stopped working. The Ports Answer but then drop immediately. The Event Viewer is filling up with these errors:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: CiscoUnity_PHGreeting
Event Category: Error
Event ID: 437
Date: 4/13/2006
Time: 1:50:34 PM
User: N/A
Computer: LKQUNITY01
Description:
An unexpected error occured while trying to play greeting for a subscriber. One possible reason could be that the call was disconnected while waiting for the phrase. This can happen when the Unity system CPU is pegged. Technical details - (PersonalGreeting) greeting for call handler id (null) with alias . returned [0x80004005] on line 1164 of file .\PHGreeting.cpp.
Bulk Edit on regular Unity servers has never caused me any issues in the past.

Event Type: Error
Event Source: CiscoUnity_Wav
Event Category: Error
Event ID: 801
Date: 4/13/2006
Time: 1:50:34 PM
User: N/A
Computer: LKQUNITY01
Description:
Cisco Unity's multi-media component has enountered a serious error.
EXPLANATION:
A serious failure has occurred on port LKQCCM-1 during wav media processing. Depending upon the severity of the failure, parties on this call could experience unexpected behavior or be disconnected. In some cases, further calls on this port will not be handled correctly.
TECHNICAL DETAILS:
Thread 0x000019AC had a Failure on Port LKQCCM-1 in AvWav
DESCRIPTION:
File: .\Wav.c(1999)
Method: WavPlayEx
Failure: call to WavOutOpen failed.

Similar Messages

Cisco Unity Connection - Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy

Hi,
We have a CUCM/CUC Cluster since 2009 and we never had problems with accessing Voicemail. We configured a Secure Siptrunk between the CUCM Cluster and the CUC-Server.
CUCM 8.5.1SU4/CUC8.5.1SU1
2 weeks ago we upgraded CUC from 8.5.1SU1 to 8.5.1SU5
Since this upgrade we had at 2 times no voicemail access from the IP-Phones registered on CUCM-Cluster (reorder tone) - in the log of CUC we saw that all 144 ports become busy !!
History:
Update CUC from 8.5.1SU1 to 8.5.1SU5 on Saturday 10/26
- first outage on wed. 10/31 ; 1:48 pm
- second outage on tue 11/6 10:26 am
After restart of the CUC-Server the system works normally - I think stopping and starting Connection Manager coiuld also be a workaround, but i did not verified this :
here the log from wed 10/31
Oct 31 13:48:37 CUC1 local7 4 : 4298: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Oct 31 2012 12:48:37 PM.862 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Oct 31 13:48:44 CUC1 local7 4 : 4299: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Oct 31 2012 12:48:44 PM.931 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Oct 31 13:48:47 CUC1 local7 4 : 4300: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Oct 31 2012 12:48:47 PM.508 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered....
the log from yesterday
Nov 6 10:26:43 CUC1 local7 4 : 14264: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Nov 06 2012 09:26:43 AM.732 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Nov 6 10:26:56 CUC1 local7 4 : 14265: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Nov 06 2012 09:26:56 AM.942 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Nov 6 10:27:03 CUC1 local7 4 : 14266: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Nov 06 2012 09:27:03 AM.147 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Nov 6 10:27:11 CUC1 local7 4 : 14267: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Nov 06 2012 09:27:11 AM.359 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Nov 6 10:27:59 CUC1 local7 4 : 14268: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Nov 06 2012 09:27:59 AM.155 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Nov 6 10:27:59 CUC1 local7 4 : 14269: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Nov 06 2012 09:27:59 AM.177 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Nov 6 10:29:33 CUC1 local7 4 : 14270: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Nov 06 2012 09:29:33 AM.475 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Nov 6 10:29:48 CUC1 local7 4 : 14271: CUC1.sprachdienst.fraunhofer.de: Nov 06 2012 09:29:48 AM.770 UTC : %UC_UCEVNT-4-EvtMiuBusyHere: %[AppID=CuCsMgr][ClusterID=][NodeID=CUC1]: Miu SIP Integration, All lines are busy on redirector 10.37.239.21:5061. An incoming call will not be answered.
Question:
do we have a bug in the software CUC 8.5.1SU5 or is there another problem ?
Any Ideas ?
regards
alex

Hi,
we opened a tac case and it seems we run into a bug which is known in Version 8.6. (We run 8.5.1SU5)
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCuc22800
Cisco already have the fix available for version 8.6.2 ES52.
Cause we can not upgrade to 8.6 (Server Hardware not supported) we will wait for the Version 8.5 Fix.
Meanwhile I will change the SIP-Trunk between the Unity Connection Server and the Call Manager Server from TLS to non-TLS (described in CSCuc22800 as a workaround)
regards
Alex

Unity Connection LDAP Error

I'm trying to setup a Unity Connection server with an LDAP directory and when I save the configuration I get this error message:
Error while Connecting to ldap://172.16.1.2:389, null
The UCONN server is connecting to a Windows 2000 DC running Exchange 2003.
I think I'm missing something simple but I'm not sure what.
Thoughts?

Hi,
Sounds like you may either have an incorrect IP address and/or port # for your DC or GC. Port 389 for a Domain Controller, and if the server is a Global Catalog, you'll need port 3268. Another possibility is that port 389 may be blocked by some sort of ACL or firewall. I would try the port change first and re-verify your IP address and if that doesn't get you anywhere, setting up a network capture to see what may be happening during the bind request is your next step.
Hope that helps,
Brad

Unity Connection Upgrade Error from 8.6.2.20000-2 to 8.6.2.22900-9

Hello,
After 2 hours my Unity show me this folow error. Anybody see this error?
06_load-database|Depending on the server specifications and on the level of activity on the system, this may take up to an hour.|<LVL::Info>

And that's not an error, if you look closely at the end, it says INFO
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

Unity Connection 8.6.2 report error and issues

Hello,
I found some other hits on this error and tried the workarounds (restarting tomcat, and report data harvester) but am still getting "Unable to find any report data based on parameter(s)" for a certain timeframe on multiple reports when I know activity occurred in that timeframe.
User Phone login report, Outcall Billing Detail Report, others.
CUC version is 8.6.2.20000-2
Problem is during this timeframe someone dialed into system and changed the transfer extensions to various LD numbers throughout an entire day and the reports aren't showing these outcalls. Call Manager CDR data show the calls being placed from Unity VM ports and the Unity Conversation Manager traces I grabbed for the timeframe show the calls to those numbers to. I'm just trying to match up with a report and figure out if there is some other log or trace file I can look to determine for sure the caller logged in to the voicemail box and changed the transfer extension on it. (guessed the voicemaill password). The failed log in report doesn't even show the failed login attempt in output from traces below. The transfer extension dest addr was different on the transfers on this same mailbox. Have locked down the system since but want to get better grip on this with the reports and traces.
I looked over the CUC 8.6.2 SU1 and SU2 release notes and not seeing any resolved bugs for these matters either.
Here are some samples lines from Conversation Manager traces:
00:32:46.399 HDR|02/04/2013 ,Significant
00:32:46.399 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9
00:33:55.006 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:33:58.955 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
00:34:37.090 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806
00:34:50.403 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,CDL,11,CCsCdlImsAccess::AuthenticateSubscriber: Cannot authenticate user: JOESMITH IMS Result Code: 1 on line 108 of file CdlIms/src/CsCdlImsAccess.cpp: Error: 0x80046505 Description: E_CDL_SP_EXEC_FAILURE
00:34:50.403 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,CDE,3,Authentication Failed for Subscriber 555123 (Src/CsCallSubscriber.cpp 2969)
00:34:50.404 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,-1,-1,An invalid password entered when trying to log into a user mailbox. Details - [].
00:36:29.331 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:36:33.484 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
00:44:53.444 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6
00:45:20.019 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:45:24.121 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
Thanks

Hello ebergquist,
As advised we could try to run a report before an upgrade was performed to verify if it will pull the information, which in the event it does we would be matching the bug, therefore access the CUC CLI and type the following command: file get install *
You will be required to have an SFTP available for the file transfer and port 22 open on the sftp client.
Once you receive the files you would need to check system-history.log, below is an example.
=======================================
Product Name -    Cisco Unity Connection
Product Version - 8.5.1.12900-7
Kernel Image -    2.6.9-89.0.20.EL
=======================================
02/24/2013 13:35:02 | root: Boot 8.5.1.12900-7 Start
02/24/2013 16:03:45 | root: Install 8.5.1.12900-7 Success
Once you check the time stamp and date of the upgrade try to gather a report for a time range before the upgrade was performed, even though they might be overwritten, there still could be a possibility that it succeeds.
If this bug is not the issue then you might want to take into consideration:
1. Make sure that the service ReportDB is [STARTED] in the output of the command: utils service list.
2. If you have Digital Networking on your server make sure there is no stalled replication. Go to RTMT (Real Time Monitoring Tool)> Syslogs> Select on the dropdown your server> Doble click on Application logs> CiscoSyslog. You can then do a manual search or sort with the filter option:
Severity: Error
App ID: CuReplicator
Hit apply. Below is an example:
Date: Feb 19 08:01:15
Machine Name: LAB1111
Severity: Error
App ID: CuReplicator
Message: : 1151681: LAB1111.corpnet2.com: Feb 19 2013 08:01:11.662 UTC : UC_UCEVNT-3-EvtReplicatorStalledReceiveReplication %[ClusterID=][NodeID=LAB1111]: Detected stalled replication receiving from location LAB1111. Waiting for missing USN 2222. This situation may indicate network connectivity problems.
3.Make sure that replication is working properly in the cluster. You can check them via the following commands: showcuc cluster status    and   utils dbreplcation runtimestate
For the TransferEx that you state changed to ceros -> TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK , this is just a hexadecimal value that is returned stating that the transfer that took place during the call was successful, in this case the actual transfer was to the following destination -> TransferEx destAddr='715551231234', and was during a call to ->calledID='555123' , this does not have to do with the actual change of a transfer number performed by a user.
Those traces won't be enough you will have to additionally set: ConvSub, level 3   and CDE, level 16 so that you may see output in the traces as the example posted in the previous thread.
Traces would be the path to follow in order to verify the user that changed the transfer rule, as this is as i understand the goal your pursuing.
However if it is of any help, another way to get on hold of the numbers that were updated on the Transfer Rule is to use the User Data Dump tool, this information reflects changes regardless of whether it was done via TUI (Telephone User Interface) or GUI (Graphic User Interface). For more information on the tool go to:
http://ciscounitytools.com/Applications/CxN/UserDataDump/Help/UserDataDump.htm
Traces are extensive to be reviewed if done manually, however you can do a text search with a tool as Notepad ++ to look for keywords as "NewTransferNumber =" or "CDE,16,Transfer allowed", once you find this you check the call GUIDwhich is the reference number of the call and that exists during the entire length of the call, whether it is while a person is leaving a voicemail or the user is accessing his/her's inbox. This would speed up your search.
So as explained in the first thread you would then do another text search returning all possible matches with that callGUID.
Now if you get to the very beginning of the call you would see something like:
Line 13712: 18:58:05.156 |24720,CCIE-1-001,0C9C97BDF5F444F0B535D231C32DDCB4,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='2199' callerName='' calledID='6789' redirectingID='' lastRedirectingID='' reason=1=DirectlastReason=1024=Unknown] port=CCIE-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=1callGuid=0C9C97BDF5F444F0B535D231C32DDCB4
In this example you see my test user callerID='2199' calling the Pilot number 6789 which is the voicemail button
calledID='6789, and the what type of call is it whether Forward or Direct, when logging to voicemail you are going to see Direct which is going to match the Direct Routing Rules and send the call to the attempt sign in conversation.
The other approach is a rule out method between the Audit traces and the User Data Dump tool.
So let's say you have a baseline document that states all of the Transfer numbers for all users.
If the User Data Dump reflects a different number and the Audit logs do not show any change, starting from the time the baseline was created and the point of time where the number was changed, then you could deduce the change was done via TUI (Telephone User Interface). Unfortunately you wouldn't be able to tell who did the change in this case.
Nevertheless, remember that a user may have for example an Alternate Extension so the change might not necessarily be done from the office phone: "Alternate extensions can make calling Cisco Unity Connection from an alternate device—such as a mobile phone, a home phone, or a phone at another work site—more convenient. When you specify the phone number for an alternative extension, Connection handles all calls from that number in the same way that it handles calls from a primary extension (assuming that ANI or caller ID is passed along to Connection from the phone system). This means that Connection associates the alternate phone number with the user account, and when a call comes from that number, Connection prompts the user to enter a PIN and sign in."
Best regards,
David Rojas
Cisco TAC Support Engineer, Unity
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 1-407- 241-2965 ext 6406
Mon, Wed, and Fri 12:00 pm to 9:00 pm ET, Tue and Thu 8:00 am to 5:00pm ET
Cisco Worldwide Contact link is below for further reference.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_worldwide_contacts.html

ERROR WHILE FORWARDING VOICE MESSAGE FROM NOTES VIEWMAIL TO ANOTHER VOICEMAIL USER IN UNITY CONNECTION

Hello All,
I am facing problem while replying/forwarding or sending a NEW Voice Message from ViewMail integrated with IBM LOTUS Notes 8.5 to the other Voice Mail User Configured in Cisco Unity Connection.The ViewMail Version is 8.0.2 for IBM LOTUS Notes.UC version is 8.x
I have attached the file that displays the error.
From the view mail inbox if i "Right Click" any email and the "Click ON Forward" I am able to forward the Voice Message from the ViewMail to the IBM LOTUS Domino user [ that is forwarding it to EMAIL Account ], but if I try to forward it to unity user is gives "Failure Delivery".
Now when I double click the individual voice mail message in ViewMail account and then click on "Forward/reply/NewMemo" icon available on the individual voice message window that I have opened ,I get an error as stated below
"The remote name could not be resolved error in Notes ViewMail 10.0.0.152e_vmws_gen_property_not_found "
where 10.0.0.152 is the IP-Address of my Unity Connection Server.
Also just for the information I am able to Login into Cisco PCA for alll the users and able to view the Inbox.
I am able to forward the VoiceMessages between Unity Connection users via CISCO PCA without facing any issue.
A Quick Help will be much appreciated .......... :-)
Hasan Jafri

Hello Craig,
After spending sometime on troubleshooting , just for testing purpose I created two new Unity Connection Voice Mail User and configured VMN [VoiceMail for Notes] account on the same lotus Notes.
Interestingly this time I was able to use Reply & Reply to All option to send the Voice Message via VMN. {WORKING JUST FINE,NO PROBLEM WHAT SO EVER ]
But still I am NOT able to use Forward option to send the Voice Messages via VMN.
REPLY WITH HISTORY & REPLY TO ALL WITH HISTORY options are also not working.
This is error that I am getting
"Error in QueryServe in CoreUCClasses 213 at line 336:Vmws:The remote server returned an error:(403) Forbidden
I HAVE CREATED VIDEO RECORDING FOR THIS ERROR & WORKING PART OF THE CONFIG TO GIVE YOU A BETTER IDEA OF THE PROBLEM.
Its 7 MB Recording. I hope you can easily Download.
Also important point is that i don't see any previous error that was accuring during my earlier testing.
Thanks & Regards,
Hasan Jafri

Unity Connection 10.5.1: I upgraded the Unity Connection Server from V 9.1. After that, cannot logn to ELM an error message " The server encountered an internal error that prevented it from fulfilling this request." appears

Unity Connection 10.5.1: I upgraded the Unity Connection Server from V 9.1. After that, cannot logn to ELM an error message " The server encountered an internal error that prevented it from fulfilling this request." appears. The error further displays "
type: Exception report
message:
description: The server encountered an internal error that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
exception:
ServletException Could not initialize class com.cisco.vos.platform.api.config.UpgradeStatus
root cause:
NoClassDefFoundError Could not initialize class com.cisco.vos.platform.api.config.UpgradeStatus
note: The full stack trace of the root cause is available in the logs.
Has anyone experience this issue? Any solutions? Your assistance is greatly appreciated!

Hi Mesut,
you can refer the link for migration
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/10x/upgrade/guide/10xcucrugx/10xcucrug010.html
regds,
aman

Error Adding user to Unity Connection 7.0.1

Hi,
I have cisco unity connection installed on standalone machine, when i try to add any user i receive error on the attached picture.
How can i solve this issue.
Thanks

The password credentials - either web or voicemail - conflict with the rules in the Authentication Rule(s) applied at the Subscriber Template and/or individual user level. If you have the "Check for trivial passwords" flag checked then your password cannot be generic strings like 123456 or passwords with repeating characters such as 112233 or even aabbccdd - they are considered easy to hack. Either assign new initial passwords or change the Authentication Rules and I suspect your issue will go away.
Hailey
Please rate helpful posts!

Error during upgrading Cisco Unity Connection to SU2

Help!
I'm facing an error while upgrading Cisco Unity Connection 8.5.1.10000-26 to SU2 (8.5.1.12900-7).
When it's trying to download the SU2 file (UCSInstall_UCOS_8.5.1.12900-7.sgn.iso ) to Unity Connection after 2GB I get this error:
Error encountered: Upgrade has detected that the ISO file name has been changed from the original name. This is not allowed. MD5 Hash Value: 32:32:db:47:99:48:c6:53:12:e2:78:76:94:90:a4:1d
I tried this from multlpe FTP servers and I downloaded the SU2 file multlpe times assuming the download was bad. I also rebooted the Unity Connection server here and there assuming it was something with the server.
I first tried SU1, but that gave the same error, so I attempted to go with SU2.
Any ideas for resolving this?
Thank you!
-rya

Hi Rya,
OK...well you've certainly done your due diligence here
Did you run an MD5 check after the download to compare the file values?
I had a long look for bugs related to this issue and came up empty so I can't see
a bug being the cause of the issues here. Is it possible for you to try "burning" the
upgrade .iso to a DVD and trying again?
I am also curious why you wouldn't move straight to 8.5(1)SU4
Cheers!
Rob
"Show a little faith, there's magic in the night" - Springsteen

Database commucation error Unity connection

Hi team,
We have a new server installation, we are trying to login to the Cisco Unity Connection server, but instead of login the system give the "database communicartion error" message, any clue about this issue?
Thanks
Best Regards.
fer

Log into the CLI and run 'utils service list' to see if the Cisco DB is running. If it isn't you can try starting it with 'util service start '. If it won't start then it's time to reinstall. I have had this happen to me once before and after TAC spent a few hours digging around they just told me to reinstall. Worked like a charm after that; apparently something secretly blew up during the first install.
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.

Weird error message in Unity Connection - Email Notifications

I went to a user, notifications, email, and put in the email address and enabled it. I click save and get this message "The specified SMTP address cannot be in the VMS domain." I searched and didn't see anything here on the forums about it and googled it and didn't find anything either. Thanks in advance.

Hi Chad,
Is the domain name of the email address you are specifying the same as the domain name that the server is using? For this to work, the email address should be in a different domain than the one that the Unity Connection server is in.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Michael.

Cisco Unity Connection single inbox and viewmail error

Unity Connection 8.5.1 single inbox with Exchange 2010 and viewmail 8.5.4. We arein the process of migrating from Unity 7.0.2 to Unity Connection.
We are a lawfirm and many of our admins have full access to their attorney's exchange mailbox to manage their messages and voicemails. With Connection those admins can no longer access voicemails in exchange accounts other than their own even if they have full access.
A message pops up stating "the requested voice message is no longer available" and only dead air is played whether playback via phone or speakers is selected. This is a huge issue for our end users.
Has anyone else experienced this or hav eany suggestions for a work around?
I have tried assigning the mailbox access delegation role to an end user but this did not grant access via vewmail.
Thanks
Liz

Hi Liz,
This is expected behavior because VMO has certain dependencies mapped between users and messages, so when a different user tries to access the message, it can't find the mapping which is why you receive that message. However, VMO 8.6(4) introduced the ability for this exact group mailbox access feature you're after.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/vmo/release/notes/864cucvmorn.html#wp346504
Hope that helps,
Brad

Unity Connection - Certificate from cucm no more trusted for encrypted calls after upgrade to 10.5(1)

Hello Support Community,
i have a strange problem:
after upgrading my cucm and unity connection from 9.1 to 10.5(1) enctrypted calls are no more working.
situation 1: CUCM is down, Subscriber is up: Encrypted call to Unity Connection work correctly
situation 2: CUCM is up: Encrypted Calls to Unity Connection not working.
i get the following Info in the log for the Connection Conversion Manager:
19:35:21.053 |15865,,,MiuGeneral,25,Invalid Certificate: Received Certificate -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIID8zCCAtugAwIBAgIQc/fBdUz1Zdh4CXhcPqGVuDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADBw
MQswCQYDVQQGEwJERTELMAkGA1UEChMCSVQxGzAZBgNVBAsTEkhlbGxnYXRlIFRl
XD0oD9d5MQ==
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
doesn't match with stored Certificate: -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIIC2DCCAkGgAwIBAgIIJWCm4bSdt+kwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAw
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
so where does Unity Connection cache this certificate and how can i delete/replace it?
the cert shown in the logs is the one from cucm: ("CallManager"), i recreated it through cucm os administration, now i see the same error message on unity connection for the new recreated certificate.

Actually It doesn't. It says he's on a MacBook. I don't know all the different types of Macs. I was having a ton of problems with iChat. I opened DMZ to my computer, knocked down all firewalls etc and left everything exposed, still with bad results. A few weeks ago my power supply went out on my D-Link. I bought a linksys. Since I'd left all firewalls off I figured it couldn't be the router. I power cycled everything n the netork, still no luck. Today I bought a universal Power supply and started up my D-Link Router. Everything worked perfectly. My wifes computer - a laptop running Tiger worked fine with the Linksys and did my machine before the Leopard upgrade. Now that I've got the D-Link online everythings working.
Message was edited by: graphico
Message was edited by: graphico

Upgrading Unity Connection from 7.1.5 to 8.5.1 - not working

I am attempting to upgrade our unity connection boxes from 7.1.5 to 8.5.1.
I have legacy MCS 7845H2 - It has 4 disks - 2 mirrors of 72gb disks. 4mb of RAM and 2 X 2.3ghz processors
I have UCS C210 VMWare Hosts.
I have attempted 2 migration methods.
The first method involves - upgrading the existing system and restoring a backup of this to a VM
This fails with a hardware compatablity check.
The second method involves - backup existing systen - build VM at same level (using recommending OVA) - restore data onto VM - upgrade VM
This fails with a restore problem - I have used 'TITAN' ftp, but please note the backup is < 900mb.
The error is
Physical restore failed - could not fork server connection, SQLCODE -25596
Program over.
Restore failed during Unity Connection DB ontape restore operation.
----> BEGIN Standard Error
/opt/cisco/connection/lib/disaster-recovery/database_do_restore.real.py:32: RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module iproduct: This Python has API version 1013, module iproduct has version 1012.
import iproduct
gunzip: stdout: Broken pipe
----> END Standard Error
Has anyone out there attempted to upgrade to 8.5.1 - please let me know how you got on.
Any help or ideas appreciated.

Here is the end of the restore log ...
CCM DB is in On-Line status after 6 second.
Restoring the Unity Connection database from ontape archive...
Archive Tape Information
Tape type: Archive Backup Tape
Online version: IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 10.00.UC9XF
Archive date: Mon Sep 26 19:45:06 2011
User id: root
Terminal id: ?
Archive level: 0
Tape device: STDIO
Tape blocksize (in k): 32
Tape size (in k): 0
Tape number in series: 1
Spaces to restore:1 [rootdbs ]
2 [cuc_er_dbspace ]
3 [dir16 ]
4 [rpt ]
5 [mbx16 ]
6 [dyn ]
7 [mbx ]
8 [dir ]
9 [log ]
10 [cuc_er_sbspace ]
11 [ciscounity_sbspace ]
12 [ciscounity_sbspacetemp ]
Archive Information
IBM Informix Dynamic Server Copyright IBM Corporation 1986, 2008
Initialization Time 06/01/2011 15:51:53
System Page Size 2048
Version 14
Archive CheckPoint Time 09/26/2011 19:45:07
Dbspaces
number flags fchunk nchunks flags owner name
1 40001 1 1 N B informix rootdbs
2 48001 2 1 N SB informix cuc_er_sbspace
3 40001 3 1 N B informix cuc_er_dbspace
4 40001 4 1 N B informix dir16
5 40001 5 1 N B informix rpt
6 42001 6 1 N TB informix temp
7 40001 7 1 N B informix mbx16
8 42001 8 1 N TB informix temp2
9 40001 9 1 N B informix dyn
10 40001 10 1 N B informix mbx
11 40001 11 1 N B informix dir
12 40001 12 1 N B informix log
13 48001 13 1 N SB informix ciscounity_sbspace
14 48001 14 1 N SB informix ciscounity_sbspacetemp
Chunks
chk/dbs offset size free bpages flags pathname
1 1 0 250000 183419 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/root_dbspace
2 2 0 915000 176607 POSB /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/cuc_er_sbspace
3 3 0 85000 83217 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/cuc_er_dbspace
4 4 0 128000 13824 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/dir16_dbs
5 5 0 1024000 744409 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/rpt_dbs
6 6 0 512000 511922 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/temp_dbs
7 7 0 512000 495816 PO-B /usr/local/cm/db/informix/data/mbx16_dbs
8 8 0 512000 511897 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/temp2_dbs
9 9 0 128000 110000 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/dyn_dbs
10 10 0 128000 119774 PO-B /usr/local/cm/db/informix/data/mbx_dbs
11 11 0 1024000 362797 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/dir_dbs
12 12 0 150000 24947 PO-B /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/log_dbs
13 13 0 10000 518 POSB /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/ciscounity_sbspace
14 14 0 450000 22554 POSB /var/opt/cisco/connection/db/ciscounity_sbspacetemp
Physical restore failed - could not fork server connection, SQLCODE -25596
Program over.
Restore failed during Unity Connection DB ontape restore operation.
----> BEGIN Standard Output
----> END Standard Output
----> BEGIN Standard Error
/opt/cisco/connection/lib/disaster-recovery/database_do_restore.real.py:32: RuntimeWarning: Python C API version mismatch for module iproduct: This Python has API version 1013, module iproduct has version 1012.
import iproduct
gunzip: stdout: Broken pipe
----> END Standard Error

Failure to upgrade Cisco Unity Connection 8.6.2 to 9.1.2

Hi everybody.
Has someone that can help me with follow problem?
I making a Cisco Unity Connection upgrade from version: 8.6.2.20000-76 to 9.1.2.10000-28. But unfortunately we can't sucessfull to make this process.
On the finish of this process, I can see this outup error:
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_manager.sh|Cleanup exiting - Cached Data: [Vendor= VMware, Inc.
HWModel=VMware
CPUCount=2
CPUType= Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2643 0 @ 3.30GHz
CPUSpeed=3300
MEMSize=6144
BIOSVer=PhoenixTechnologiesLTD 6.00 06/22/2012
ObjectId=1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1348
OSVersion=UCOS 5.0.0.0-2
SerialNumber= VMware-56 4d e0 4f 4d 85 87 7b-eb 22 0e 52 a7 73 1a 22
VendorOID=1.3.6.1.4.1.674]|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Cleaning up download...|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Cleanup upgrade source area.|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Ejecting DVD (/dev/sda1)|<LVL::Debug>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Removing /common/download/9.1.2.10000-28|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:55 upgrade_install.sh|Started auditd...|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:56 upgrade_install.sh|Started setroubleshoot...|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:56 upgrade_install.sh|Changed selinux mode to enforcing|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:56 upgrade_install.sh|Cleaning up rpm_archive...|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:28:56 upgrade_install.sh|Removing /common/rpm-archive/9.1.2.10000-28|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|IOWAIT monitor stopped|<LVL::Info>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|File:/usr/local/bin/base_scripts/upgrade_install.sh:599, Function: main(), Upgrade Failed -- (1)|<LVL::Error>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|set_upgrade_result: set to 1|<LVL::Debug>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|is_upgrade_lock_available: Upgrade lock is not available.|<LVL::Debug>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|is_upgrade_in_progress: Already locked by this process (pid: 14477).|<LVL::Debug>
11/23/2013 12:29:00 upgrade_install.sh|release_upgrade_lock: Releasing lock (pid: 14477)|<LVL::Debug>
Best Regards,
Claudio Costa
A mensagem foi editada por: Claudio Costa

Tks Manish, I just perform a restart on the both nodes on my CUC cluster and after that I did can install this upgrade patch.
Also is very important install the upgrade patch on all servers of the cluster before perform a switch-version on the publisher and then on the others nodes.
Best Regards,
Claudio Costa

Unity Connections - Miu Errors

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for