Universal Binary programs for processing RAW images

Hi,
Are there any universal binary programs for processing RAW files (from my Nikon D200)?

I currently use a D-70 and have had no problems importing and manipulating NEF files with iPhoto 6.0.1. I would assume that the D-200 uses the same file structure as the D-70, doesn't it?
intel iMac 20"; 1.67 GHz PB G4; Dual 2.3 GHz PowerPC G5 Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Similar Messages

Can I download Elements plugin for Processing RAW images from Sony ILCE6000?

Can I download Elements plugin for Processing RAW images from Sony ILCE6000?

If you are using PSE 12 or 13, just go to Help>Updates in the editor.

Preference for Processing RAW in LR or PS Camera Raw

I'm not finding this setting anywhere, and it seems to arbitrarily go back and forth, after updating software or installing software. Hoping someone can help.
When using an external editor (PS CS5) to edit photos from Lightroom 3, there is an inital preference to select whether to use ACR in PS to process the raw file, or to use LR. I always want to do this in PS. There's often times where I'm compositing multiple photos. I only need to open up that raw file to quickly grab a section of it to move into another file. I don't want to save the raw file as a psd, tif or whatever, just select, copy and move that section of the file and then close it.
The problem is that preference setting is only when you first set up the Lightroom, I'm not seeing it anywhere on any of the preference menus. And for some reason, it has switched to processing the raw in Lightroom. So now i'm ending up with useless psd files. That takes up space on my hard drive, takes longer to archive on to external hard drives, and is slower to open the files into PS. It may seem like a small inconvenience, but when shooting 1000s, or 10000s of images a week it adds up quickly. And to get rid of them, i have to reveal in finder, then delete, then remove from catalog in LR - which just wastes time.
Am i missing something? If anyone knows how to set this or a workaround i'd love to hear it.
Sys specs, if it matters
Mac Pro, dual quad-core, 16gb ram, GeFOrce 8800 GT 512mb graphics card
OS X Snow Leopard
LR 3.6
5d Mk II CR2 files
PS CS5 (12.0.4) and also the newest prerelease (can't disclose much on this)
LR and PS are both great in their own right, and do things better than the other in some situations, I wish Adobe would make them play nicer together.

7. Feb 16, 2012 6:05 PM (in response to b_gossweiler)
Re: Preference for Processing RAW in LR or PS Camera Raw
In any event even if you choose to edit the original in PS, as I believe you should be able to do you will still end up with a Tiff, PSD or jpeg file when you have finished your work in PS. Then why are you using Lightroom? This will have a bearing on the advice you will get.
Like I said above, LR and PS both serve specific functions, and yes they do overlap in some areas, and I yes do use both in my workflow. PS isn't a cataloging program. LR doens't have layers and sucks at complex editing tasks. There's 2 reasons i use both, amoung many many others.
The point of my question is that i don't want LR creating and saving PSD files on my hard drive when i don't need a PSD of that specific photo. You use to be able to make LR open a raw file in PS and use ACR to processs it. That meant you could close the raw file in Photoshop, and nowhere along the way was a PSD file, or any other file saved.

Quick preview looks better than processed raw image...??

Hey all, probably a bit of a "newb" question here... so forgive me, and thank you...
Using a D7000 and often times when I shoot - the preview image on the camera looks BRIGHT, VIVID and ROBUST ... after import however - when reviewing my shots, JUST as I arrow over to the next shot - many of the preview images tend to look better than the processed image that aperture displays once it's done spinning it's wheels.
Perhaps I've messed up a Raw Fine Tuning setting?
When I click on quick preview and browse through an import, the pictures truly look nicer to me than the when aperture processes them.
Without question, the display on my acer monitor is a far cry from the miniature compressed image on the back of my nikon, however the more i shoot, the more I realize a disconnect between what I think I should see, and what I'm ultimately seeing in Aperture.
Are their specific settings to fine tune the import of raw d7000 shots?
Thanks much.. gk

I take it you're shooting and processing RAW images?
It's worth remembering that if you have a picture style selected (i.e. vivid etc), your camera might be applying extra contrast and saturation etc to the image you see on the back of the camera. Camera manufacturers do this so that we can give our pictures some extra punch and colour automatically.
I'd also be wary of comparing what you see on your camera to what you see on your monitor. Unless both are calibrated, you shouldn't trust either of them 100%. The best example of monitor calibration is going to look at TV's in an electronics store. You'll probably notice that in a wall of TV's, some pictures will be darker, some lighter, some more vivid, some more saturated. Using a calibration tool adjusts the picture your screen and monitor displays so that it is 'accurate'.
It's a bit like having a room full of scales and adjusting them so that they all read 1 kilogram when a 1 kilogram weight is placed on each of them. Calibrating monitors will mean that when you display an image on it, it will always look the same rather than getting the some light/some dark problem you saw in the TV store.
It's a tricky subject to explain (don't worry if it doesn't make sense), but you might like to have look around YouTube for videos on the subject.

I'm thinking of buying a new camera. Does anyone know if can I process RAW images from a Nikon D5100 or Nikon D3200 using IPhoto on a OSX 10.5.8?

I'm thinking of buying a new camera. Does anyone know if can I process RAW images from a Nikon D5100 or Nikon D3200 using IPhoto on a OSX 10.5.8?

I think you'll note that Google found the list for 10.8, amazing, isn't it
No, neither are supported for Raw on 10.5.8
You'll need 10.6.8 minimum for the D5100
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3825
and for the D3200 you'll need 10.7.4 plus compatibility update 3.1.3
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4757
Bear in mind that you may also need to update your version of iPhoto too.

How can I process RAW images?

Can anyone tell me how I can process RAW images? I have a lumix FZ45, iPhoto on Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5 (11G63)

Using software that supports RAW for that camera
it should come with the camera - if you have iPhoto '11 version 9.4 or above these Mac support list for Lion is here http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4757
LN

No NON-Universal binary program will run

So after loading itunes 7.0.2 for my new shuffle, my non universal binary programs will run. not sure where to put this questions. When you go to run the program it will bounce once in the dock and won't open. Universal binary programs work fine.
Steps I have taken
1. reloaded a program so see if it would work
2. repaired disk
3. repaired permissions
4. created separate user and ran program under that user
5. Reset the PRAM
6. tried something called update pre-bindings, but this wouldn't work.
does anyone have any ideas

Archive and install installs a new System Folder next to your old System Folder, with your old User settings. For more details, please look at this KBase article: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301270
Afterwards, you should reinstall third party applications. In the installation dialogs, you can choose which languages you want to install.

Aps for processing RAW or DNG picture files

Are there any aps for processing RAW and or DNG files on ad iPad?

In the normal situation, LR needs to see a PS installed for it to detect the Edit In PS option is possible, so if you uninstall both, then install PS, first, then LR. Of course with this release there may be some hiccup that requires installing either one or the other, again, but if you've uninstalled both and are reinstalling both, then install PS, first.

How can I process Raw Images taken with a Nikon D7000 in PS4 Extended?

How can I process Raw Images taken with a Nikon D7000 in PSE Extended?

Hi there
Unfortunately, CS4 does not support the Nikon D7000. You'll have to download the Adobe DNG converter (links below) to process RAW files from your camera.
DNG converter 6.3 - Mac
DNG converter 6.3 - Windows
Here are some answers to similar questions asked over in the Photoshop General discussion:
If you need further information on this topic, please feel free to post in the Photoshop General Discussion or in the Camera Raw forum.
Camera Raw | Supported cameras
Camera Raw | compatible applications
Cheers,
Kendall

Before purchasing Elements 12, I would like to know if it will process RAW images from an Olympus OMD-EM1. Can someone advise? or tell me how to find out?

Before purchasing Elements 12 I need to know whether it will process RAW images from an Olympus OMD-EM1. Can someone advise or tell me how I can find out?

Hi,
This document defines the supported cameras
Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
According to that, the OM-D E-M1 is supported by Camera Raw 8.3 which is compatible with Photoshop Elements 12. You should try the trial download first to make sure you are happy with it.
Once you have downloaded and installed the trial version you will need to go to the help menu and select Updates..
If you decide to buy it, you can convert the trial version to the full version by supplying the new serial number.
I would avoid the Mac App version and don't get the upgrade version unless you have an older version.
Good luck
Brian

Universal Binary Driver for Photosmart C6180

Is there a Universal Binary Driver for the Photosmart C6180?
I'm trying to use Presto Page Manager, a Paperport-like application for OS X, and it isn't recognizing the scanner. Their tech support (or what passes for it) is telling me I have to use a Universal Binary Driver.

Since the printer works on a different computer, it sounds like the issue is strictly software based.
It sounds like a complete reinstall of the software for the printer needs to be done. Ensure that the software is uninstalled from the Vista system.
If the fatal error appears again, try using the A 'Fatal Error' (MSI error) Displays on the Computer During HP Software Installation in Windows document from HP for assistance with the fatal error.
↙-----------How do I give Kudos?| How do I mark a post as Solved? ----------------↓

Has anyone had issues with poor image quality when using lightroom to process raw images from Canon 7dmk2

Hi everyone..
..I have been having image quality issues when using Lightroom to process raw files from a 7d mk2... They are all soft with poor clarity.....tonight in despair I tried processing them using canon's software and they are totally different..."much better"
anyone else had similar problems....Andy

I have a 7D2 and have not had what I interpret as poor image quality that has anything to do with the camera.
Can you post a screenshot of what you’re seeing and what specifically you don’t like? Maybe there is something you can do differently or at least there may be an explanation for what you’re seeing.
And if you have a raw image that you wouldn’t mind sharing in a public forum, upload to http://www.dropbox.com/ then post a public share link to it in a reply, here.
In other words post a screenshot of what you see in LR, another of what you see using DPP, and a link to the raw file you’re processing.

Processed RAW images revert to "original" view in iPhoto

iPhoto brings RAW images in from my Nikon D70 just fine. I choose "edit in external editor" and process them in Photoshop Elements 4, saving them back to iPhoto. So far, so good. The edited version always shows in thumbnail view and shows also when I click for full view...at least for a moment. It then "reverts" to the original image view, though I still see the edited version in thumbnail and that is the image that is sent when I e-mail.
It's just irritating not to be able to view the edited version singly or in a group comparison. Is this a bug? Is there a workaround? Has anyone else experienced this?

This issue has never been resolved, but I am marking it as solved just to take it out of the queue

Universal Binary Shockwave for Mac? Is Director on its way out?

Anyone have any thoughts about if and when there will be a
universal binary version of shockwave for the Mac?
Also, Director seems to receive very little attention from
Adobe. Anyone know anything or care to speculate about Adobe's
commitment to maintaining Director. I'm guessing that adobe will
eventually ad 3D capabilities to Flash and do away with Director.
My company use to do a lot with Director, now we have a scant few
clients who bring us work that requires it.
As the Art Director for my company I have had a somewhat
passive role with Director, creating art and presentations that
only require basic navigation and animation and handing off to a
true programmer when more complex functionality is needed. Our
programmer has left and it seems on some level I am now assuming
the role of main director person, at least unofficially. I also
have a beginner to intermediate level of proficiency with Flash.
I'm pretty much left to teach myself what ever programming our
clients need as it is needed. My plate is full and I'm trying to
determine if I need to invest time in really learning lingo beyond
my rudimentary working knowledge, or just concentrate on expanding
my Flash knowledge base. If Flash did 3D, I would probably forget
about Director because it seems like it is on it's way out and most
of the things our clients need I think can be done in Flash
although for standalone presentations, I prefer the seamless flow
of Director to the "wait to load" result of Flash.
Any thoughts on this?

As Adobe says itself:
A new version of Director will be released in the first half
of 2007. It
will be sold under the name Adobe Director. No features list
available yet.
That's the only information we have and you'll have to live
with it until
the release (or beta program just before).
Adobe doesn't have anything else in its product range that
comes close to
Director and Shockwave. Shockwave 3D is still to this day the
most reliable
Web 3D plugin available (even if it has not the best
rendering quality but
sufficient for games, e-learning and 3D product assembly
instructions).
Adding 3D to Flash Player would mean a heavier download
(Flash Player 9 is
already 1 MB without the Yahoo toolbar).
The other news it that Tom Higgins, the Director Technical
Product Manager
left. I believe his position has already been filled
internally by someone
else at Adobe (it's a huge company) or will be soon (haven't
seen any job
offer yet for this role).
Best regards,
Karl Sigiscar.
http://www.chromelib.com/

Program For Process Order

I am creating new lay out for process order in smart forms.for that we need a standard program where we get the standard program
Regards
manoj

check table TNAPR for KSCHL = NEU.
/edit LD00 is jackshit this is delivery note.
Edited by: Florian Kemmer on Apr 21, 2009 12:25 PM

Universal Binary programs for processing RAW images

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for