Unloading point and ship to party not copied from PR to PO

Gurus,
Am populating unloading point and ship to party in a PR for both item category standard (" ") and service ("D"). However during PR conversion to PO, both these fields only get copied for item category standard and NOT for item category service. What is the correct set up so that these fields are copied from PR to PO during PR conversion ? Any customizing point i missed ?
Cheers
Olivier

HI,
Please see note:
118008 > MM-SRV: Goods recipient and unloading point missing
unloading point can not be used in MM-SRV.
About ship to party I was not able to find any information. I would recommend to enter a ticket at SAP, so that an expert can have a look into your system.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Similar Messages

Ship to party not copied from PR to PO for item category D

Gurus,
Am populating unloading point and ship to party in a PR for both item category standard (" ") and service ("D"). However during PR conversion to PO, both these fields only get copied for item category standard and NOT for item category service. What is the correct set up so that these fields are copied from PR to PO during PR conversion ? Any customizing point i missed ?
Cheers
Olivier

HI,
I think this is the wrong forum to proceed with this.
SAP Community Network Forums » SAP Solutions » SAP Solution Manager
Regards

Ship-to party to copy from contract to service order

Is there a way to copy the ship-to party from the contract (not from the customer master) to the service order when creating the service notification and service order with reference to the contract?

Hello Sylvia, Can you please tell me, how could you achieve the requirement of creating the service notification and service order with reference to the contract.
Has it been done by manually using any tcode or customization or it did involve technical coding ?
Please let me know the details of the process followed in any case.
Thanks in advance,
Vishnu Priya

Shipping Instructions text not copied from Sales Order to Delivery Document

Hi All,
The Shipping instructions text in the Sales order Header is entered manually. Now when the delivery is created, the text is not getting copied to the Header text (shipping instruction note) of the Delivery document.
What may be the problem. Can anybody help ?

Hi
Check this link
http://learnsaptips.blogspot.com/2010/09/text-type-configuration-in-sap.html
regards
Prashanth

Sales office and sales group are not copied from quotation to sales order

Hi All,
I have maintained sales office and sales group in quotation maually at header level.while coping to sales order sales office and sales group are missing.
Please let me know what would be reason for missing those twoand whether i should check anything in copy controls.
Regards
Mohan

As its a standard functionality to have the Sales Group & Sales Office from Quotation to Order. But in your case, check the Copy Control settings at Header Level .
DataT 051 General header data Copying requirements 001 Header-same customer
DataT 101 Header business data
DataT 001 Partner header
In case , they are also same, then check if any Logic is added in the Existing Routine.
Best Regards,
Ankur

Unloading point and Goods recipient in Purchase Requisition

Hi,
I have a requirement to update Good Recipient and Unloading point in Purchase requisition.
I am using BAdI ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST and PROCESS_ACCOUNT Method.
in PROCESS_ACCOUNT method I am using IM_ACCOUNT_REF and GET_DATA and SET_DATA methods. and this is working fine for me.
I need your help in resolving below problem.
If Purchase already planned with some Materials by an individual, is now added more Materials by another individual, the system should assign the values of the Goods Recipient and Unloading Point of the second individual to the Material items in the document. The Goods Recipient and Unloading Point values of the existing Material items in the document should remain unchanged, unless these values are specifically changed by the user editing the document or the Material number of the original item has been changed by the user, following which the Goods Recipient and Unloading Point values of the current user should be adopted instead, overwriting the existing values.
GET_DATA and SET_DATA methods does not have the inforamtion Material number filed.
I have also checked GET_PERSISTANT_DATA and GET_PREVIOUS_DATA.
Please let me know which BAdI and method i can use to cater this requirement. or any Enhancement points.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
Reason for not getting populated these fields from PR to PO
through ME59N or ME21N is because in general, in case of service
environment, these are not available as explained in attached
note 118008. Their role is taken by the so-called user fields
since release 4.0 which are declared as text fields and play
a purely informative role only....
These two fields have never been included into the standard
functionalities due to the basic business process which does not
include these fields for service transactions/functionalities.
The fields "unloading point" and "Goods recipient" are not available
for services in R/3.
>>The same functionality exists for blanket pos.<<<
One reason for this is that the account-assignment screen is filled
by the user on sub-item level. The system aggregates this information
to item level. This is not possible for the unloading point and goods
recipient, because there can be several unloading points / goods re-
cipients for one purchase/requisition order item.
This functionality won't be available in standard R/3.
See also note
633986 FAQ: Account assignment in the service
Br
Nadia Orlandi

Unloading point is not copied from PR -PO,when i change account assignment

Hi All,
unloading point is not copied from PR -PO,when i change account assignment from 'K' to 'F' in PO. unloading point field should be in display for both 'K' & 'F' Account assignment category in SPRO because we r using this field to acknowledge my thirty party planning system.
Thanks in advance
Vengal Rao

Have a look at SAP note <a href="https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/734273">734273</a>

Ship to party and Bill to party not reflecting in marketing documents

Hi,
Ship to party and Bill to party not reflecting in marketing documents inspite of defining it in BP Master data.why does it happen.we are on 8.8 version and this is happening in Livedatabase.
Thanks,
Mansoor Baig

Hi Mansoor,
Is this for new transactions or existing ones that went thru the 8.8 upgrade? Is this for new BP that the address doesn't show or existing (if you have other transactions with no address problem then it shouldn't be the address format setup unless something happened in the upgrade).
Heather

SHIP TO PARTY NOT DEFINED FOR CERTAIN SALES AREA

Hi ...
I am creating a specific type of sales order in va01 by reffering a billing document . But soon after entering billing document no it is showing " SHIP TO PARTY NOT DEFINED FOR CERTAIN SALES AREA..." The sales area --- which it's showing in error it is quite different ....it's not that one what we used for it in that ref billing document .
Note : We are maintaining ship to party , sold to party ..... in CRM only
Their also I checked it is assigned properly .Relatioship with sold to party is also OK .
But in R/3 I have checked that ship party is created in VD01 Where as sold to party is created in XD01 .
PLS ADVC

Dear Sundar,
Please check in these areas
1.Check the sales area which you are trying to create sales order and copying invoice sales area is same or not.
2.Why you haven't created ship to party in XD01 transaction.
You go to XD01 transaction exetend the customer master then try.
3.Check the customer master(Ship to party) is available under which sales area.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Ship-to party not defined for sales area

Hi all,
I am really confused while creating a sales order, I need your help.
My sales org. - 1083, distribution channel - CY, Division - CW.
When I enter va01, in the initial screen I enter the above details. Then it goes to the create sales order screen where I enter my customer details.
After that, I enter my material number and quantity, it is giving me an error ship-to-party not defined for sales area 1084 CY and ZO ( other division) instead of 1084 CY and CW.
Where did I mess up ?
Thanks,
-Chandru

Hi,
Go to SPRO - SD - BASIC FUNCTIONS - PARTNER DETERMINATION Just check whther your partner function (SH) is assigned to your account group and also exists in the partner determination procedure.
Just try and maintain it there against your account group and against your sales document type in VOV8.
Also open your customer master for which you are trying to create this sales order. Just check whther in the partners tab , SH is shown? You can either use transaction BP or XD03.
Let me know, reward points if helpful.
Regards
Ravi

ORDERS 05 idoc sold to and ship to party?

As far as i know the ORDERS 05 idoc is for sales order which we get from the customer who wants to but products from our company.
In the idoc there is a segment E1EDKA1 contain sold to party and ship to party fields. What is the significance of these fields? What values are filled for these fields? Are these 2 fields also part of any other idoc?
In real time from xi point of view from which system to which system this data will move?
I have checked few documents on sold to and ship to party but ended up getting more confused.
Please help me with the answers.
Regards,
Suresh.

Hi Suresh,
The Sold to and Ship to party details from posted IDOC type ORDERS 05 are not at all in relation with the data moving from XI to whcih are sender and receiver systems.
You are right as the ORDERS 05 is used for Sales Order.
While creating the sales order we need to specify the Sold to party and ship to party information. this gives the information about the party against which you have generated the sales order and the the ship to party will indicate the location specific branch of the customer party.
For.eg. the customer will be requesting for the sales order and he wish to deliver the order at his particular branch then Sold to party--Customer No and Ship to party i.e. Location specific details are required.
Thanks
Swarup

Sold to party and Ship to party are the same but has different address

Hi,
I have problem here wherein Sales order has the same sold to party and ship to party but they have different address. When the customer master data is changed the sold to party in the sales order is also updated but the ship to party is not updated.
I've checked the table VBPA and I noticed that the value of ship to party VBPA-ADRDA is 'E' (manually enetered).
Is this the reason why the address of ship to party in sales order is not updated whenever the customer master is change?
Another question, how does ship to party entered in sales order manually?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Please correct me if I have understood the scenario incorrectly which I try to explain below:
Sales order is created where SP and SH both have same address initially and while creating the SO, address of the SH was changed manually by Header>partners>SH
Now master data for that customer is changed for address. As per the standard functionality of SAP, all sales order created for that customer will have new address for SP only.
If address of SH needs to be changed in SO, it has to be done manually by the same way as explained in the above mails.
As far as manually entering the SH in SO is concerned, system will automatcally selects the SH if only one record is available for SH. If you have specified more than one SH, system will give you an option to select one by displaying a pop up.
Please let me know if you find this explanation suitable.
Ravi

Company code and Ship-To Party: variable values should be dynamic

Hi,
We have queries where we have Company code & Ship-To Party as Variable parameters.
While executing the report the user has to give the Variable values for both company code and ship to party.
But when they give the company code.....in the next parameter ship to party, it has to offer values which belongs to that company code only. But here it is offering all values form ship to party., where user don't want to see the value from other company code as they have lot of values there which is causing inconvenience to the user.
Kindly suggest me how to restrict the values at variable level.
Thanks & Regards,
Anand

Hi,
You can do that using BADI BW_BADI_F4 .
You can use this BAdI to restrict input help for entry variables in the BI variable screen.
Create a separate implementation for each required InfoObject.
The BAdI is designed for multiple use.
Restricting input help without using hierarchies
To restrict input help for flat object lists without using hierarchies, use method Get_Restriction_Flat.
Method GET_RESTRICTION_FLAT
I_VNAM Variable
I_IOBJNM InfoObject
I_T_VAR_RANGE Table of entries on the variable screen
I_T_COMPID Table of participating queries
C_T_RANGE Range table with other restrictions
C_INFOPROV InfoProvider
C_F4_Mode F4 mode
Entry parameters I_VNAM and I_IOBJNM return the names of the variables and the InfoObject that F4 helpwill be affected for. I_T_VAR_RANGE returns additional values from the variable screen entered beforethe call. These are returned in a range table that does not, however, return any information about variables that cannot be entered. I_T_COMPID is a list of participating BI queries.
If there is a single InfoProvider, entry and return parameter C_INFOPROV contains the InfoProvider forthe participating queries, and can be overwritten in the implementation. Especially when you have justone MultiProvider, this allows you to restrict the input help to one of the physical InfoProviders ifyou also set the F4 mode to u201CDu201D (input help from dimension tables). The mode can onlybe set to u201CDu201D in conjunction with physical InfoProviders, as dimension values are otherwisenot available. If you reference to a VirtualProvider that is based on a data transfer process, you always need to set mode u201CMu201D (input help from master data)
Return table C_T_RANGE is a range table of additional restrictions that can be used in the implementation.These restrictions are identical to restrictions that the system makes in the standard setting. It is therefore not possible to add to the list.
The following restrictions are permitted in C_T_RANGE:
u2022Restrictions for InfoObject I_IOBJNM itself (for example using a specified range)
u2022Restrictions to groups of InfoObjects (for example restriction of the fiscal year variant for fiscal years)
u2022Restrictions by the InfoObjectu2019s navigation attributes.
For technical reasons, pure display attributes cannot be used.
You can also make a restriction to physical InfoProviders. In this case, the input help is restrictedto the specified physical InfoProviders. Field IOBJNM in table C_T_RANGE then has to be set to 0INFOPROV.In the case of a MultiProvider using physical InfoProviders with mode u201CDu201D (input help from dimension tables), the input help is built from all participating physical InfoProviders.
Entry and return parameter C_F4_MODE describes the retrieval method for the F4 help:
u2022In mode u201CMu201D, the input help is built from the master data.
u2022In mode u201CDu201D, the input help is built from the dimension tables of physical InfoProviders.
The choice of method is therefore always dependent on the choice of InfoProvider.
Restricting input help using hierarchies
To restrict input help for flat object lists using hierarchies, use method Get_Restriction_Node.
Method GET_RESTRICTION_NODE
I_VNAM Variable
I_IOBJNM InfoObject
I_T_VAR_RANGAE Table of entries on the variable screen
I_T_COMPID Table of participating queries
C_T_HIERARCHY Table of possible hierarchies
C_T_NODE Table with node restrictions
C_INFOPROV InfoProvider
C_F4_Mode F4 mode
On the whole, this method is the same as method GET_RESTRICTION_FLAT. Instead of a C_T_RANGE, the additional node restrictions can be submitted using table C_T_NODE.
C_T_HIERARCHY contains the hierarchies that can be used based on the existing query restrictions. Ifthis table contains multiple entries, the system uses the first hierarchy in the standard setting. In a BAdI implementation, specific entries can be removed in order to select the required hierarchy.
Table C_T_NODE can be filled with individual nodes in order to restrict the hierarchy to the corresponding subtrees.
All other parameters are the same for Get_Restriction_Node as described above for method Get_Restriction_Flat.
For more information about implementing BAdIs for the enhancement concept, see the SAP Library for SAP NetWeaver, under BAdIs u2013 Embedding in the Enhancement Framework..
Regards,
Durgesh.

Proper value of ship to party not geting picked up for a given sold toparty

Hello,
We have a bdc program which passes data to the VA01 transaction. We are passing partner values like sold to party and ship to party using this program. However when we open our order, the value of ship to party is getting replaced by the value of sold to party. We debugged the program but could not find out the reason. This problem is there only for one sold to party value. It is working fine with other values of sold to party. We feel it is some master data setting for this particular sold to party that is responsible for this behaviour.
Please let us know incase you have any possible suggestion.
Thanks in advance.

Harsh is right, need to check your partner functions tab in the sales area view of the customer master. There should at a bare minimum be one reference to function SH and a number. If there is more than one ship-to then your program must have logic to derive what is right ship-to to be used. I am wondering if this is the case and your program is defaulting to first SH available, that being the sold-to number. Please review and advise.
Thanks,
Jay

Enhancement for validating SOLD TO PARTY and SHIP TO PARTY

Hi All,
Have written in the form routine USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAK to validate the sold to party and ship to party, but whenever error is encounted the input fields comes in display mode but i need that in change mode so that user can enter the input again.
Quick response will be appriciated..
Thanks & Regards,
Parvez..

Hi,
Since the userexit code is not called within the CHAIN...ENDCHAIN or using the FIELD statement...
When you get the error message the entire screen will be blocked..
Try giving a warning message..
THanks,
Naren

Unloading point and ship to party not copied from PR to PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for