Unmatched gr/ir between migo and miro

Hi Consultant,
I would like to know how to set off gr/ir account due to discrepancy.
Change quantity in miro, hence gr/ir cannot be set off completely as value different from migo time. system still allow to create 57# though with block for payment status.
May I know subsequently, how can i set off the gr/ir discrepancy? just leave it unmatched forever?
Thanks

1 If I do further GRN, it will automatically set off the gr/ir account and i do not need to do miro or mr11 again. correct? - YES
2 If the variance has no further GRN, I need to run MR11. how can MR11 setoff when there is a variance in gr/ir?- It will post as below
GR/IR - Credit/Debit (based on the scenario)
Inventory or consumption or Price difference account - Debit/Credit
refer this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/30/1060387db94003e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm

Similar Messages

Difference between MIGo and MIRO for GR IR clearing

Hi all,
I hav created one PO in foreign currency for 10 items. GR is happening for all 10 lines with rate say Rs 50. Now when i am doing MIRO with same rate i.e. Rs 50, 8 materials are getting posted correctly. But for 2 materials there is inventory posting for fixed amount (in local currency) irrespective of quantty.this case amount in foreign currency is same but dieefernce for GR/IR account is in local currency.
When line items analysed it was observed that fo these 2 materials exchange rate picked up is different than header exchange rate. the difference in exchange rate is posted to stock account.
In short system icking differen xchange rate for different line items for one invoice ( MIRO is happening against only one invoice)
Can any one please explai this phenomena and any solution for this?
thanks

When you do aut. clearing and the exchange rates account is set up it will clear the GR/IR account.
There is no reason to change exchange rates

There is a tax code difference between PO and MIRO

There is a tax code difference Between PO and MIRO.tax code is VO in PO but it must be T8 becuase invoice is T8.can you please solve this issue ?
Thanks & Regards
Raj

Hi
Put the Tax code same in PO and MIRO, because In F-47 you have to give the PO no in it. Then create MIGO, Then F-48 and then create MIRO, and Then F-54 Then F-58.
Thanks
Anil

Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

Hello Experts,
One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
SEZ
Calculation of import Duty
Input goods
Material Base Value
       2,171,385
Landing Cost
             21,714
For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
BED @
10%
           219,310
Loaded in material cost
CVD, @
12%
           289,489
Credit taken
Customs Education Cess
3%
             15,264
Loaded in material cost
ADDL Duty
4%
           108,686
Credit taken
Customs Duty
           632,749
CVD
12%
           219,310
All duty
4%
           108,686
Cenvat
           327,996
CST
       43,427.70
2214812.7
Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
Regards,
Vishal Jadhav

Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

Non Cenvatable material - Value not matching in MIGO and MIRO

Dear SAP experts!
We have the following problem.
We are using TAXINN.
We create a Purchase Order for a raw material, which is non cenvatable for a particular vendor.
When we carry out Goods Receipt, we change the Material type from Raw Material to Non Cenvatable in the Material Type in the Excise Item Tab and post the BED and AED values, the values are getting inventorized correctly.
And MIRO posting is also happening correctly. Both, MIGO and MIRO values are tallying. i.e, The total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, if we change any of the BED or AED value at the time of posting GR in the excise Invoice tab, then we are facing problem.
Value during MIGO posting is correct. That is the total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, During MIRO posting, the value of BED and AED is not getting picked.
The value during MIRO shows only Basic Price+CST and not BED amount and AED amount.
Can any one tell me, where it is going wrong.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthuraman.K

you have to used non deductable condition type in Taxinn to post tax to inventory
that is
JMIP IN: BED inventory % say 8%
JAIP IN AED inventory % Say 4 %
JMX2     IN: A/P BED inventor 100 %
JAX2     IN: A/P AED inventor 100%
and the above condition should be assigned to proper Classify Condition Types
TAXINN     JMIP     BEDINVENTP BED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JAIP     AEDINVENTP AED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JMX2     BEDINVENTT BED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JAX2     AEDINVENTT AED Inventory Total
And also u will have to assign condition type JMX2 and JAX2 in Maintain Excise Defaults
this will solve your issue

Why req MIGO and MIRO in third party scenario

Hello All,
In third party scenario why we req to do MIGO in ref to PO.
In 3rd party we create sales order with item cat TAS.
We got the PR
with ref to PR we create PO.
then we do MIGO and MIRO
also If vendor is delivering the goods why we do the Delivery and PGI and then Invoice
Why not Invoice with ref to sales order.
regards,
abhijit

Hi
In Third Party sales, the Item category is TAS ,if the Vendor directly supplies to the end customer.
In Item category TAS, "Billing Relevance" is "F", i,e. Order related billing as per invoice quantity.
If the Item category of the Third Party item is TAS, then Schedule line category is CS in standard. If you will go to CS, you will find , the "Delivery relevance" field is blank and there is no "Goods movement" also. That means no Delivery takes place against the Sales order, so no goods issue.
This clearly indicates, we do not create any Delivery and no goods receipt takes place in third party sales process, when the vendor directly sends the goods to the customer.
Once the goods are send to the end customer, Vendor creates an invoice and sends to the ordering company. Now, ordering company goes for Invoice verification ,what the vendor has sent to him. We only go for MIRO here and not MIGO.
After that, the ordering company, creates the Customer invoice with reference to the Sales order(placed by its customer) and sends it to its customer.
Complete process:
Once the order is received from the custome(say ABC)r, the company (say XYZ) creates a Sales order ---> Purchase requisition is automatically triggered from the sales order -
> from this Purch requisition a PO is created for the vendor -
> aginst the PO, Vendor delivers the goods to the customer ABC and charge the ordering company,sends invoice for the same to the ordering company XYZ -
> Ordering company XYZ does Vendor's invoice verification and creates a Customer invoice with reference to customer's(ABC) order and sends to the customer ABC.
Some times Vendor sends the goods to the ordering company and then ordering company delivers the goods to its customer.
Vendor does not deliver directly to the end customer in this case.
In this case Item category is TAB and Schedule line category is CB.
Here, Billing relevance is "A" - (Delivery related billing) in the Item category TAB, that means here Delivery takes place and Billing is created with reference to the Delivery created to the customer.
In Schedule line category CB, you will find, 'Delivery relevance" field is activated and there is a movement type "601".
So, Delivery and goods issue both takes place here.
Here we go for both MIGO and MIRO.

Update Ledger group in BKPF at the time of MIGO and MIRO

Hi Friends,
In our current implementation we have requirement to update a certain Ledger group, to restrict the postings in all ledgers, at the time of positng in MIGO and MIRO.
Can you please let me know how we do this.
Waiting for your reply,
Madan Mohan

Hi Santhosh,
Thanks for your reply. But in the substitutions at header and line item level i didnt find the 'U300' userexit.
Can you suggest me at what level i can find that user exit.
Thanks and Regards,
Madan

Returns to vendor agter MIGO and MIRO

hI,
I have made on PO, did MIGO and MIRO for the same (CIN)
Now i want to send back the material to vendor in two scenarios
1) After MIGO
2) After MIGO and MIRO
3) After payment has been done.
Regards,
Satyendra

Hi,
For First case you can use 102 mov type against material document to return material.
For Second & Third cases
1) Create a return po and check the return item field in the po detail.
2) create a return goodds receipt with migo. 161 will happen automatically.
3) create a credit memo thru. miro.
4) crease a excise invoice for other movements thru J1IS (if material is excisable.)
5) post a excise invoice thru J1IV
Revert back if any doubts.
Ashok
Reward is useful.

Business area in migo and miro

hi,
i activated business area financial statement in ob65.and i make gl field status and posting key field status business area is optional.and i assigned business area to plant in OMJ7.
while doing migo and miro business area is not taking for gl a/c.
is there any further settings required for this .please give me the solution to resolve this issue.

Hi
Encountering the same issue ...any suggestions pls
Have activated BAFS in OB65 and assigned Plant Division combn to Business area in enterprise structure. But still business area is not getting defaulted in MM and excise utilization transactions
Thanks and Regards

Path to tcode MIGO and MIRO???

I can't find the path to tow tcodes MIGO and MIRO.Help me, please!!!
Thank you for reading my post^^

Hi,
MIGO
SAP Menu> Logistics-> MM-> Inventory Management> Goods Movement--> MIGO
MIRO
SAP menu-> Logistics> MM->Logistic Invoice verification-> document entry----MIRO
Regards,
Biju K

Purchase Order, MIGO and MIRO

Dear All,
Please guide me how to map the below scenario in SAP.
We have to procure Material 'C' for that we have to get the Material 'A' from "X" Vendor. And it has to be delivered to "Y" Vendor. Then vendor "Y" uses Material 'B' and he does some processing and deliver Material 'C' to us. How to raise a purchase order, how to do MIGO and MIRO.
Thanks & Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
1. Raise the PO(1) against the X vendor (materila A). in PO give the delivery address as Vendor Y..( it is in PO itemdetail tab)...
2. create one more PO(2) (as subcontract) with item cater as L and issue to Vendor Y....
Item C should have BOM as mateila A...
3. Now you receive the materila A at vendor Y as against the PO(1).... (vendor X deliver the materila directly to vendor Y)...
Now for when you do migo for the PO(1), it will hapen for movement type 101 and in backgorund it create the 541movement type to vendor Y ( issue componet to sub contract vendor )
4. Settle the Invoice of Vendor X in MIRO seperatly.
5. receive the Goods from the subcontract vendor (y) throug MIGO
6. do MIRo for PO(2)
Hope you understoud this...
REgards
anand

Account entries at tie of migo and miro

Dear Gurus,
please let me know about the account entries at time of MIGO and MIRO.
thanking you in advance
Best regards,
Raghu
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 22, 2011 3:20 PM

Dear,
During MIGO Goods receipt,
Inventory stores a/c - Debit entry of value 'x'
GR/IR clearing a/c - Credit entry of value 'x'
For MIRO,
Vendor a/c - Credit entry of total invoice value
GR/IR clearing a/c - Debit entry of value 'x' & Few other entries
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Difference between MIGO and MB1C

Hi, all,
Could you please tell me what's the difference between MIGO and MB1C?
Thanks

Hi JC
After sap 4.6 enjoy transactions were provided by SAP , which groups many functionalities together
MIGO is one of such enjoy transaction and it can do the function of the earlier old trnasactions like
1. Mb1a - Enter Goods issue..
2. Mb1b - Transfer Posting..
3. Mb1c - Enter other goods receipts.
Many times for the adherance of SOX audit - adhering to segregation of duties , companies provide very selective users Authorization of MIGO and provide authorization for Individual transaction (MB1C , MB1A, MB1B) to Employees
I hope the above provides you the difference and background of the transactions
Thanks and regards
Vikrant

Exchange rate difference while posting ME21N MIGO and MIRO

Hi All,
I am facing one problem with exchange rate type between M and EURX and EURX is maintanined in the SPRO>SAP Netweaver>General Settings>currencies>Check Exchange rate types
EXRT : EURX
Usage    : EMU Reg,fixed
Ref.Curr    : EUR
Buy.ra.at
Sall .Rat.At
Inv
EMU   :X
FIXED
Scenario:
Company(USD) is maintaning Exchange rate type: M and no exchange rates are maintained for USD:EUR or EUR:USD.
Eur is maintaing in Exchange rate type EURX.
1) PO (ME21N) is posting for the Vendor on posting date 01/01/2008. Transaction currency is EUR and company code currency is USD and Quantity : 25000
--> Exchange rate 'M' is not maintained for EUR and values are picking from the EURX Type. In the PO, Exchange rate is picking correctly from the EURX table entries on 01/01/2008.
2) MIGO: GR is posted on 01/25/2008 and with 15000 Quantity. Exchange rate is getting currecly from the table on 01/25/2008.
3) MIRO: IR is posted on 02/15/2008 and Vendor Account is picking correct exchange rate from the table but GR/IR account is caluculations EUR:USD is differntly .
Note: It is not GR based IR.
Ex:
PK AC                DESCRIPTION                    Tran Curr (EUR)    Local Curr USD
31 5004789     Vendor Account                       24,718.48-            38,777.12- USD
86 2525000      A/P-GR/IR NON-INV                24,718.48            38,883.73 USD
91 6584785      SERV-OTHER O/S                    0.00                 106.61- USD
Here GR/IR account is cal dirrently.
4) Credit Memo posted against IR on 03/25/2008. Exchange rate is given while posting CM same as Invoice. But system rate is different. Here also how the GR/IR is calculating is question is it not taking from Table or from any other rate types . Same problem like IR for GR/IR account.
Entry is posted like
PK ACC         Description                            Tran curr(EUR) Local curr(USD)
21 5004789     Vendor                                   24,718.48        38,777.13 USD
96 2525000     /P-GR/IR NON-INV                   24,718.48-      38,892.22- USD
81 6584785     SERV-OTHER O/S                     0.00            115.09 USD
This problem is same like GR and also SPL document is posting differenly for ZG and ZL ledger.
ZL ledger is posting same like Accounting CM document ZG is posting with the different amount . This different amount is nothing but the exchange rate as per the posting date 03/25/2008. Exchange rate on 03/25/2008 is differe from IR date 02/15/2008 .
ZL ledger is calculating based on the 02/15/2008 date and ZG ledger is calculating based on the 03/25/2008 . Difference between Exchange rate entered in the CM and 03/25/2008 table entry rate is showing exchange rate difference field in the Addtional field in the document display.
Thanks in Advance.

Dear Friends,
Thanks for your helpful answers, actually we are in big export business. So we have to clear 100s of invoice lines with payments at one go, (which obviously being booked at different dates) so it would be very difficult for the user to go one by one invoice.
My concern is, why system does not calculate exchange rate difference based on actual documents, i.e. Invoice to payments only. I think there might be some configuration needed to implement this functionality.
Please help.
Regards

Same PR still outstanding in MD04 although the PR-PO-MIGO and MIRO happend

Dear experts,
following is the scenario-
for material type: V1 PR is created (01/03/2011) once it went below the reorder point with delivery date 01/11/2011 as per the lead time (7 days) and PO. now the goods receipt happens on 01/21/2011 and IR on 01/26/2011.
and again the SAME PR (with exception message 07) as above is again shownig in MD04 with the same creation date and PO but its open -
Question: does the PR is again outstanding because the delivery of the goods was not as per the lead time (why the same PR is still showing although the PR-PO-MIGO-MIRO already ahppened for the material)?
thanks for your replies.
Edited by: Coolio7 on Jan 28, 2011 8:21 PM

Propably some one created a PO directly instead of converting the PR and PR is not getting deleted because it is firmed. Delete the firming indicator and check.
Cheers
Rav

Unmatched gr/ir between migo and miro

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for