Unpegged Supply Records in ATP Enabled Plan

OK this is a variation of a thread I had up about two weeks ago. Working an SR on this and seem to be spinning wheels a bit. We run two plans daily. One plan is for planner/buyers to launch planned orders and reschedules etc. We follow up with a second plan that points to ATP. The ATP plan has unpegged planned orders with an action = Release that do not respect any order modifers...whether it be FDS, FLM, Min order, Max order etc...etc... The analyst points to sales orders being entered and schedule while collections is running. His reasoning is because we are running enable 24 x 7 and he believes the records are being inserted via ATP Post Plan Processing. We are struggling with this for collections runs when we do not have OM or PC folks around. Thoughts? Thanks!

'Origination Type' column will be shown in the supply/demand window(of the planners w/b) in the 'Order Tab' and will be displayed by default after 'order priority'.
Possible values are 'Atp' & 'Planning'.
Lookup-Type code Meaning
MSC_ORIGINATION_TYPE 1 Planning
2 Atp
msc_orders_v selects the origination_type based on the record_source in msc_demands, msc_supplies & mfg_lookups.
You can identify it via this way.

Similar Messages

How to create two employees with same name as supplier record?

Dear all,
We need to create a supplier record for an employee so that we can issue invoice for pretty cash payment. If there are 2 employees with same name, how can we create supplier records for these 2 employees? The system does not allow duplicate supplier name.
Please advise.
Regards,
HY

Hello,
In R12 it is possible to create 2 employee with same name but different employee number.
And also possible to create these 2 employees as suppliers in Payables.
HTH,
Vik

Updating a record with an enabled control

i need to implement enabled controls like text area with the following javascript :
document.forms[0].elements.disabled= false;
it works well but when i update records in a form, it always displays an error message from internet explorer: HTTP 404 impossible to find the page .
what can i do ?

Yes, you can extend the AbstractTableModel and write a method for updating a whole block.
lets say you've got a Vector with Float[] arrays as elements to hold a 2D array of Float. The you could write:
      TableModel dataModel = new AbstractTableModel() {
            public int getColumnCount() { return col_names.size(); }
            public int getRowCount() { return data.size();}
            public Object getValueAt(int row, int col) {
               return ((Float)((Float[])data.elementAt(row))[col]).toString();
            public String getColumnName(int col) {
             return ((String)col_names.elementAt(col));
            public Class getColumnClass(int col) {
             return String.class;
            public boolean isCellEditable(int row, int col) {
              return true;
            public void setValueAt(Object aValue, int row, int col) {
               try {
                 Float fv = Float.valueOf((String)aValue);
                ((Float[])data.elementAt(row))[col] = fv;
               } catch (Exception ex) {
            public void setBlock(Float block[][], int row, int col) {
               // copy the Arrays with System.arrayCopy into data
      };PS: I don't know, if the above is correct written, havn't test this. But I hope you can recognize the idea behind it.
wami

Fixed Days Supply , Oracle E-Business Suite Planning

Dear Sir/Madam,
With regard to using fixed days supply on item attribute level, we are not yet sure what the effect is on the planning.
We know that demand over a certain period of time (FDS) will be aggegrated to one orderline.
However, if in week 10, demand has been aggegrated for let say quantity 10, and during that week (and thus in the weekly MRP RUN), additional demand of 2 in that same timeframe is needed.
Will Oracle include that extra demand and make one orderline for 12?
We currently think that FDS frames are frozen after one MRP Run. is this true, and can this be ignored?
What I mean is:
For item XB we have the following planned orders
-5 need by date 10-03-2015
-7 Need by date 10-06-2015
-10 need by date 10-08-2015
If we set FDS to 365 days, for item XB, Oracle will aggregate total demand of 22 in one orderline.
But what happens if suddenly a new planned order enters O_MRP
3 need by date 08-08-2015?
Will the planning , unless we haven't released the orderline of 22, make a new orderline for 25 units for need by date 10-03? We currently think it generates a rush order.
Many thanks in advance!

OracleE-BusinessSuiteR12AdvancedSupplyChainPlanningConsultantCertifiedExpert wrote:
Hi All,
I work as demand planner(supply chain) and my company use oracle.
I would like to know would above course would help me to do my job better ?
The short answer is probably.
The long answer:
- You have mentioned a certification and then referred to it as a "course".
- To achieve certification you need to pass two exams: (Ref: Oracle EBS R12 Advanced Supply Chain Planning Certified Expert Consultant )
- Associated training courses are recommended ... though not mandatory in this case ( See recommended training on exams from the above link).
- It is almost certain that whatever training one undertakes that should increase knowledge ... and if job relevant it should help you get your job.
- You will need to look at exam topics (or training course topics) and make a self assessment of how much you stand to gain; and how much it will gain it in future.
---- You should know more about yourself than anyone else, and if you are honest with yourself should be able to work out your own cost/risk/benefit.
------ Remember cost may not only be monetary ... it may be time you could have spent doing something else ... perhaps with your family.

Supplier Management Module - to enable Performance page

Hi All,
We are working on E Sourcing 5.1 trying to enable Supplier Management Performance page in the module.
Please help with any pointers/guidelines on how to do the same & further use it.
Many Thanks,
Tripti

Hi,
For Vendor :
While scoring, Identify the Date to Publish and select Share With Vendor on the Metric Definition(both located on the Header Tab of Scorecards) which publishes the score to the Scorecard Channel of the Vendor Workbench.
For Buyers:
Check the security profiles.
Thank you,
Mani

No ATP with planning material consumption

Hello,
Can you please help to clarify if SAP allow to make an ATP check using MRP strategy 63 of Material master with PIR consumption of planning material?
I didn't find a requirement class that allow both combination Availability check and allocation indicator =3
Thanks for help
Regards

There is no strategy type available to fulfill both availability check and allocation indicator 3 in the system. So it looks your requirement is NOT standard.
Regards,

ATP against planned independent requirements

I have set up materials that are linked to planning materials using strategy group 63. I have tested setting the planning material consumption to a 2 for forwards/backwards and 3 for forward only. I have set up planned independent requirements by week.
When I book a sales order it gives me a material availability date that is in the week prior to the availability of the material based on planning. For example I have 100 parts available for week 30 which starts on July 21 yet my sales order shows a material availability date of 7/16 and a goods issue date of 7/18. How can I ship the goods if they are not available yet. Any ideas on what could be wrong??
Many thanks for any and all help!!
Debbie

Hi YMReddy,
my requirement is that I input PIR for some materials, and want those materials reserved by this PIR, since this PIR are special, can not be used by other requirement.
regards
Gang

Copy function without writing empty records in BI Integrated Planning

I've got the following data model:
- one source cube which acts as a buffer, holding only a small amount of new data records
- one target cube, which holds the whole amount of data
- both are on the same aggregation level
I want to do the following:
- copy the new data in the source cube to the target cube
- by doing this, I want only those records changed which are actually in the source cube. All other other data records of the target cube should stay unchanged
The problem is:
I tried this using the standard copy function, but if there are only a few data records in the source cube, the copy function sets all other records in the target cube to zero.
Question:
How can I change only the data records in the target cube which are copied from the source cube? I don't want the copy function to write empty records in the target cube for not copied records.

Hi Aline,
This is the normal functionality of the standard copy function. It will copy source to target if the characteristics matches and would post zeros to the other records in target.
I got a similar requirement and I had gone with FOX for copying the data.
Write the FOX to copy the key figures from source to target for all the characteristics in the target.
Regards,
Srinivas Kamireddy.

Which TV recorder box is enabled to connect with B...

I am looking at a dvd recorder set top box and I note some offer wireless connection to allow your laptop to be streamed to the TV via the box. Does anyone know which boxes are best to use for BT sport? Is is easier to stream wirelessly direct from a laptopto a smart TV and if so what do I need to buy if anything to make it easy? This should be an easy one to answer but I am not very tech savvy! JP

Not sure about the wireless option, but streaming direct from laptop to telly generally requires just an HDMI lead.
You can click the white star next to this message if you think it was helpful.

ATP based on planning output

Hello,
Appreciate if you could help me to understand how ATP based on planning output works in following scenario.
ATP-enabled plan is an ECC plan with supplier capacity constraints. The ATP plan has both forecast and sales order demand. When ATP plan runs, supply planned orders will be generated based on supplier capacity constraints.
If a new sales order is scheduled, will ATP suggest a promise date by
1) considering the supply planned orders generated for the unconsumed forecast
OR
2) generating a new supply planned order for the new sales order
If (2) is used, will the sales order be scheduled out to a later date if the supplier capacity has already been taken up by the planned orders generated for the forecast demand?
Cheers!

ATP will suggest a Schedule Ship Date / Schedule Arrival Date (based on scheduling setup in Order Management) considering the supply planned orders generated for the unconsumed forecast.
If all the planned ordres are already allocated to other newly scheduled sales orders (i.e. entered in the system after last plan run), then for the newest sales order which you are trying to schedule, ATP calculation will be done to check the earliest availability using the ATP Rule defined for your item in the Org where you want to schedule the sales order. If no ATP rule is assigned to the item, then default ATP rule from Org Parameters is used. When you accept the new suggested date for scheduling the sales order, the sales order starts appearing in the ATP plan (in pink color text) but no new planned order is created. New planned order creation will happen only when you run the data collection and plan again. Similarly, consumption of unconsumed forecast will also happen during this new plan run.
In the above scenario, if you have a multi level BOM for the sales order item with
- the child items ASCP planned and ATP enabled and
- resources in the routings of BOM items at different BOM levels CTP enabled
then ATP will explode thru' the supply chain bill, check availability of each child item and resources required for those and accordingly return an availability date.
Newest sales order will be scheduled out to a later date if
- the supplier capacity has already been taken up by the planned orders generated for the forecast demand and
- such planned orders are fully allocated for new sales orders scheduled after the last plan run but before your newest order

In ASCP Workbench - Need to take action against sales order types

Hi Team,
I am facing one issue, In ASCP workbench, when we query an item with conditions Order type=Sales Order, I can see many rows with Action=Release, Action=None.
Some rows with Action=None is in pink colour (without taking action against this in ASCP WB) and some in black colour.
For rows with Action = Release, We can check the Release check box and can modify the "Implement date" field, Save and Release (Tools-->Release). Then we can see the changes in Schedule ship date field in Sales Order line (Source Instance)
But for Action=None, We can't check the Release check box (But User want to implement New date for this also)
Since this is linked with OM, I am in a position to solve the issues urgently based on the below questions.
1. Which one triggers the Action=Release or None
2. What modification needs to change in SO line (Source instance) to know the changes in Action column in ASCP WB.
3. User needs to implement new dates for the items having Action=None also. For this how can override or any workaround is there?
Note: For the items having same Old due dates and
Please suggest me ASAP.
Thanks and Regards,
Ramesh

Dear Ramesh
Ones in Pink - Your plan is ATP enabled plan. So if there is a new sales order entered in OM module there is a sales order entry made in the ATP table the moment its scheduled in source. But since ASCP has nt been run yet they are still showing actiona s none in the plan.
W r t one with action release your understanding of ship date updation through ascp release is correct.
Why does customer want to chnage date on other sales orders (action-none) ? . ASCP has planned and it is saying that such is the date of expected shipment and so action is none. Any business reason why a date change and release is required on action none sales orders? By default behaviour action None cant be released to source .
Best Regards
Partha

Infinite Supply and ATP calculations

Hi,
We are using an Unconstrained plan which is ATP enabled.We have setup ATP rule where the Infinite Supply option is set as Cum Total Lead time. Now, we have Purchase Orders that are placed both within and beyond the Cum Total Lead Time. For example, let's say the Cum total LT is 30 days and we have 2 POs, one on the 15th day and the other on the 40th day. When we do our ATP, we are able to see the PO which is on the 15th day but the PO on the 40th day is not seen by ATP since it assumes that since our infinite supply option is 30 days, we can meet any order within 30 days and the system gives an ATP date of 30 days. The requirement here is for ATP to ignore the Infinite Supply option if there is a PO or Intransit available beyond the Cum Total LT and consider that for ATP calculations. So, in the example above, ATP should return a date of 40 days from now.
I have tried using both the options ATP/CTP Based on Planning Output and ATP/CTP Based on Collected data for the profile option INV:Capable to Promise, but it still ignores the POs beyond the Cum Total LT. Please help with your ideas if ATP can be made to look beyond the infinite supply option in the ATP rule.
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi Devesh,
Thanks for your input.
The only problem in having the highest lead time for buy items as the Infinite Supply is that if there's no On-hand, PO or In-transit available for a Demand, ATP will return a date of the highest lead time for all items that is assigned with that ATP rule in that Org. We have our lead times ranging from 10 days to 120 days. If we set the ITF as 120 days (user defined) and enter a sales order for the item which has a total LT of 10 days, ATP will give a date of 120 days if no supply is available. This will not be acceptable as we will be communicating 120 days to the customer whereas actually we can get that item from our supplier in 10 days.
Please correct me if my example is incorrect. Also suggest if we can bypass the scenario above with any other setup.
Regards,
Abhijit

ATP/CTP Based on Planning Data- Clarifications

Hi gurus,
All below are ATP/CTP Based on Planning Data:
1)Implications of enabling ATP(Enable ATP check box) in while running plan and not enabling ATP check box.?
2)I am running a Plan with ATP enabled, what benefits we get if i run with 24x7 ATP and what benefits we get if without 24x7 ATP. Basically would like to know the functionality of 24x7 ATP.
3)Have set up plan without ATP,
After plan run if i create new sales order will it be shown in planning workbench?
If it is not showing up what could be the reason.
When this new sales order is expected to be shown as Majenta color in planning workbench.
4)After plan run if my new sales order ATP to get occurate(Supply/Demand) data from planning output, what are all necessary setups i have to do (May be simple typical setup)?
Otherway around: what are all the necessary steps and concurrent programs to be done in order get current supply/demand picture.
Please do the needful.
Thanks.

Hi
Do want to use priority based on demand class? The prioritization of ASCP is diffrent from demand class prioritization. You will need to have a customization to assign demand class based prioity and update the demand lines to respect it by ASCP .
Please try to use Allocated ATP . The use allocated ATP profile needs to be set to yes. There should be proper allcoation rule also setup based on demand class. But you cannot guarantee that the ASCP and ATP will be in sync
Thnx
partha

Global ATP does not honor supply from some orgs

Global ATP does not honor supply from some orgs
ATP based on planning data.
Planning completes OK and shows enough supply (in planning workbench).
ATP plan based on Bill of Distribution defined like this:
Source for ORG1 is ORG2 ->
Source for ORG2 is ORG3 ->
Source for ORG3 is Supplier
When inquiring ATP in ORG1 it considers supply only from ORG2,
nor ORG3/Supplier.
Despite the plan contains supply from all orgs.
Any solution ?

I think you need to set up a direct relationship between ORG1, ORG3 and the supplier. ORG3 and supplier would be lower ranked options.
For Example-
ORG1 from ORG2 rank 1 100%
ORG1 from ORG3 rank 2 100%
ORG1 from Supplier rank 3 100%
The results will also depend on whether the plan is constrained and/or optimized.

ATP Inquiry Supply/Demand

Running 11.5.9 Advanced Supply Chain Planner>>>ATP>>>ATP Inquiry. It would appear that this inquiry takes its supply and demand information from the ascp plan. Is this a correct assumption? If this is true is there anyway of this inquiry capturing supply that is created through the workday or do you always have to wait until the plan runs again?

Yes. The ATP Inquiry Form always takes information from the Plan. If there is any new supply created in the worday, you will have to wait till the Plan runs

Unpegged Supply Records in ATP Enabled Plan

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for