Unsupplied vendors shouldnt consider during vendor evaluation
Dear Gurus,
At present during vendor evaluation system considering all vendors including un supplied for a period of time. the requirement is how , and where to exclude the unsupplied vendors, during the vendor evaluation , please share with full details im fresher in sap mm.
Do you have an evidence that the vendor evaluation calculated scores for a vendor who had not any transaction?
Similar Messages
-
Vendor Evaluation during Service entry sheet
Dear all,
I would like to know, which place in Service entry sheet, the score are entered for vendor evaluation and also please guide me how to run vendor evaluation back ground, by steps
Thanks for your help and appreciated if you can help me immediate
Regar1. Execute ME6G transaction
2. Click Step icon or Edit>>Step or Press F6
Click Goto>>Variant if variant exist or Click Maintain Variant (if variant dont exist)
Select the variant and follow from Step 3 Given below
If you dont want to maintain variant
1. Execute ME6G
2. Click Start Condition
Click Immediate button or maintain date/Time
3. click Check and Save
4. Save the Transaction
5. Go to SM37 Transaction
6. Enter the selection parameter (Check all the checkbox in selection indicator)
7. Check Check box Near the Job
8. Click Spool
9. Check Spool No check box
10 Click ABAP List In Type Colomn
11. Spool request display will be there -
Vendor Evaluation Period Selection
Dear Sir,
We use ME63 for Vendor Evaluation , here we do not find any option to give the period over which Vendor should be Evaluated . We have a requirement that Vendor Evaluation must be based upon the Purchases made during period 1-DEC-2007 to 31-DEC-2008 .
Kindly guide us , as how can be achive it please .
Rgds
B MittalHi
Standard SAP does not provide you such a facility, wherein you can run the vendor evaluation for a specific date range.
There is a days selecion criteria in customizing settings for a purchasing organization wherein you specify the no. of days which needs to be considered for reporting from the current date, the documents that are posted within that date range from the current date are only taken into consideration for vendor evaluation.
You can manually maintain the number of days in the customizing, which needs to be considered for scores calculation.
Thanks
E.Avudaiappan. -
Hi Experts
During vendor evaluation which program gets hit. particularly delivery date related. In the selection criteria the proposed delivery date is from PO creation date say if 5 days is the lead time, the PO creation date is 10.11.08 ,po release date is 11.11.08 and proposed delivery date is 15.10.08 and if the reciept date is 16.10.08 the delay is 1 day.
In my scenerio the system should consider po release date as the start date and not the po creation date.
Which tables get effected and which tables I have to change
RegardsHi SAPMAN, the system uses the SIL for its calculation.
In case you need to extend the timeline you could use the Statistics-Relevant Delivery Date in Delivery Schedule tab, so the vendor wont get a bad scor due to your internal delay.
Regards.
Willy. -
hi
we have following requirements:
1) Addition of new sub criteria for the main criterion "Service" (we already use standard sub criterion --- timeliness of service and quality of service).
i) Legal requirements
ii) Safety
iii) Damanges / Penalty
These sub criterion should appear during Service entry sheet (as timeliness of service and quality of service appears) and user will enter the scores against this sub criterion.
Pl suggest.
2) When Service will be procured by central purchasing group ---vendor evaluation should consider following sub criterion only
i) Timeliness of service
ii) Quality of service
When Service will be procured by local purchasing group ---vendor evaluation should consider following all sub criterion
i) Timeliness of service
ii) Quality of service
iii) Legal requirements
iv) Safety
v) Damanges / Penalty
Pl suggest how we can achieve this
regards
PravinHi,
the enhancement MM06L001 comprises four function exits, which are invoked
during the calculation of the scores for the subcriteria.
In order to satisfy your business process you need to write your own
coding into the function modules
1. EXIT_SAPLMEL0_001
2. EXIT_RM06LBAT_001
3. EXIT_SAPMM06L_001
4. EXIT_RM06LBEW_001
Regards,
Edit -
Hi All,
We have a problem. The vendor evaluation report is not considering the rejections of goods and shows the quality as 100.
The client has not maintained any scores for quality. This may be the reason, or is it mandatory to have QM module to evaluate vendors based on quality??
Currently they receive goods into GR blocked stock first. If its fine, then they goods receipt it or else they return it using Mov Type 124. Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
VThi
for vendor evalution you have to do the necessary settings in MM and QM. then you have to carry out the transactions in MM and QM -
Confirmation date in vendor evaluation
Hi Gurus,
Can you please let me know the settings to be maintained to get a score for the sub criteria Adherence to confirmation date during vendor evaluations.
I've already maintained the purchasing org config settings like weighting and point scores for the automatic criteria.
But when I run a vendor evaluation there is no score coming out for the sub-criteria Adherence to confirmation date.
I'm using the confirmation control key One day acknowledge and confirmation category AB (Order acknowledge). Please let me know if anything is missing out
Regards,
Ashwin.Ashwin
Our company has the same issue, did you find a solution to this problem?
Thanks
Brad -
Dear All,
Kindly give me the vendor evaluation formula.
I have configured the vendor evaluation with the following weighting factors:
Price : 30%
Quality: 50%
Delivery : 20%
i want to know how it is calculating internally in SAP .i want the formula for thes
Regards
Kumar.Hi,
please go through the following link. there is a document given by SAP.
COIN error during MB1A transaction code
this document explains all the formulae you are asking.
agian there are many threads which discuss about the various problems faced in this functionality and there you may find the explainations related to it with the formulaes.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar -
Vendor Evaluation (End-User process)
which are the end user transaction code for the activity involved in the Vendor Evaluation?
I need the Steps considering the creation of Purchase requisition till the report of Vendor evaluation.
**Urgent**
Regards
SandeepHi Sandeep,
I just have heard abt the process which i would like to share with u...
the process goes like this
PR ==> RFQ ==> Quotation ==> price comparison
Guru's if I'm wrong please correct me. Even i would like to know the transaction code involved in this...
anything left by my side pls do correct me.
regards
namrati -
Discrepency in Vendor Evaluation Report
Hi All,
The vendor evaluation report does not consider the rejections and shows the quality as 100. Any suggestions on how to rectify the same?
ThanksHi All,
The client has not maintained any scores for quality. This may be the reason, or is it mandatory to have QM module to evaluate vendors based on quality??
Currently they receive goods into GR blocked stock first. If its fine, then they goods receipt it or else they return it using Mov Type 124. Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
VT -
Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history
Dear all,
I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
Vendor XYZ
Material ABC
For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
For 2010 Maket price 8.2 Effective price 8.5
Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
Vendor XYZ
Material DEF
For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
For 2010 Maket price 20 Effective price 22
Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
5 Price behavior 5.0 10
5 Price behavior 10.0 15
5 Price behavior 20.0 20
5 Price behavior 50.0 20
5 Price behavior 99.0 10
5 Price behavior 5.0- 50
5 Price behavior 10.0- 100
5 Price behavior 50.0- 20
5 Price behavior 99.0- 10
Pls help me resolve the issue
Regards.
Milind DugadeHi Siva,
[Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Reward if helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Naveen Dasari
Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM -
Hey Gurus,
During the pre-study for implementation of the vendor evaluation tool in R/3 my business team has asked for reports showing the data/orders behind the evaluations. If, for instance, a low score is computed for the u201COn-time deliveryu201D criterion they would like to know which orders/deliveries have caused this low score for a vendor.
They see a danger in contacting vendors with low scores and complaining/trying to negotiate better rates based on scores without being able to tell how the scores were calculated and which orders were u201Cbadu201D.
Hope you can help.
Thanks in advance.
K.R.
DagHi,
Normally you can use the "Additional Info´s" functionality but
the function 'Additional Infos' is not available for all subcriterias.
Especially for the delivery criterias it is not possible, because there
is no more detailed information in the system about the score which is
already shown on vendor/material level.
The scores of delivery criterias are calculated for each GR but the
scores are not stored on this level in statistics. The scores are
stored on 'Inforecord-level' therefore there is no lower level
available in the protocol (no more detailed information about this
line).The function 'Detailed information' is only available for
criterias with type '4' pricelevel
'5' pricehistory
'7' Quality lot GR
'9' Quality lot audit
'1' semi-autom. Criterias.
So, you can not have this information in the standard.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack -
Shipping condition in vendor evaluation
how shipping conditions are taken in vendor evaluation.
As per my knowledge, the shipping instruction you define it in PO,during GR for the PO,you need to evaluate it and assign the score for the shipping, after evaluate the ship.inst ,the score will affected to the quality criteria.
-
Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time del
hi
We have following requirement related to Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time delivery
The requirement is:
Deliveries late by 7 days should be considered as on time.
pl suggestHi Chintu,
Thanks for ur reply.
scores i have configured for qty.variance as,
2 Qty. reliability 100
2 Qty. reliability 5.0- 90
2 Qty. reliability 10.0- 80
2 Qty. reliability 20.0- 75
2 Qty. reliability 40.0- 50
2 Qty. reliability 50.0- 40
2 Qty. reliability 75.0- 20
2 Qty. reliability 80.0- 1
My dought is, For on on-time delivery we are not maintaining any smoothing factor right?
So, Which smoothing factor we should consider for on-time delivery?
I have maintained smoothing factor for
Timeliness service - .20
Quantity Reliability - .30
Shipping Instructions - .25.
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 4:43 AM
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 8:25 AM
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Dec 1, 2009 6:30 AM -
Vendor Evaluation - Statistical Delivery Date
Hi,
The statistical delivery date is an important field during the calculation of the on-time delivery score. (see note 310666)
After implementing a new support package this field wasn't filled up automatically anymore. Fortunately note 1039344 and 1164767 helped overcome this.
But ... in the meantime purchase orders were created and received without a statistical delivery date.
Which date / or what does sap do when calculating on-time delivery score if there is no statistical delivery date ? Does it take the "delivery date" into account ?
with regardsUse this link http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Or find on the SAP help Vendor evaluation white Paper its there.
Edited by: Prashant Prasad on Jul 31, 2009 12:01 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Adobe Reader uninstall problem
I'm using Reader 10 and was advised to delete version 8.1.4 because it is vulnerable to hack. I get the following error message when I try to uninstall from add remove programs. "Installation source for the product is not available. Verify that th
-
My update says that its going to take 6 hours to install , is this normal?
my update says that its going to take 6 hours to install , is this normal?
-
Am I infected by malware or trojan horse?
Hello, first of all: I do have experience on Unix (FreeBSD) and OSX for some years now. The system is up to date and before I contact Thomas from the thesafemac.com team I wanna ask the following points and discuss them with the community first. 1. w
-
Hide link to SAPguiDetails from completed task list in UWL
Below is the code I have in XML file to hide links to SAPGuiDetails. <Action name="launchSAPDetails" handler="SAPMiniAppLauncher"> <Properties> <Property name="display_order_priority" value="uwlExcludeFromPreviewDetail"/> </Properties> </Action> This
-
SAP CAL - Free Solutions - Try Now
Hi, I registered SAP CAL (cal.sap.com), but once I tried Free Solution and Try Now button, it does not work. According to one openSAP documentation, it is supposed to show "Term and Conditions", but nothing happens. I was suspicious about the browse