Untrusted connection Error when using google search field in top line. Ok with other search engines

When opening www.google.dk and searching from the page, everything is ok
When using Google search engine in the address line search bar the error is present
When changing to Yahoo, bing or another search engine in the search bar, the error is not present
So, the error
"www.google.com uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.
(Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)"
is only present when using google search engine in the search bar
Have tried to delete the files cert8.db and key3.db with no success
Read about firewall settings, but Bullguard firewall was not covered

In your "More system details" it says your address bar search provider is Babylon, not Google. Perhaps that's the problem? Or are you using a shortcut to force the address bar search to Google?
This add-on will reset your address bar search to Google: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/searchreset/
That might not stick if you have an add-on which reverts the setting. You can disable nonessential and unrecognized extensions here:
orange Firefox button (or Tools menu) > Add-ons > Extensions category
Also, you might need to edit or delete your user.js file to prevent your settings from being overridden at the next startup. This article has info on that: [[How to fix preferences that won't save]].
Any luck?

Similar Messages

  • I have o s x 10.7.5 using hp laser jet all in one 3050 printer. when using google chrome I can't print. works with safari.

    When using google chrome I am unable to print from this search engine. I can print from Safari.

    If the printer works with Safari and other programs, then the problem is with Chrome. Ask their tech support for help.

  • FTPs connection error:When using Variable substitution for Directory path

    Hi
    I am transferring data from BI to xml file via PI: Here a Client proxy from BI sends the data to PI and the PI FTPs the XML file to a remote location. For FTP I am using FTPs SSL connection.
    It was working fine untill I used Variable susbstitution to determine Directory path dynamically. I am using this because different xml files are intended to goto the different locations.
    I did the variable substitution like this:
    Target Message Structure:
    ---> Target Directory: %var1%
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    <MT_BI_EXTRACT_FILE>
      <Header>
         <Directory>/Customer</Directory>
    </Header>
    <Detail>
    </Detail>
       </MT_BI_EXTRACT_FILE>
    And in the variable substitution I am doing it this way
    payload:MT_BI_EXTRACT_FILE,1,Header,1,Directory,1
    And the error I am getting is:
    Attempt to process file failed with Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: iaik.security.ssl.SSLException: Peer sent alert: Alert Fatal: handshake failure
    MP: Exception caught with cause com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: iaik.security.ssl.SSLException: Peer sent alert: Alert Fatal: handshake failure
    Exception caught by adapter framework: Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: iaik.security.ssl.SSLException: Peer sent alert: Alert Fatal: handshake failure
    Delivery of the message to the application using connection File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool: com.sap.aii.af.service.util.concurrent.ResourcePoolException: Unable to create new pooled resource: iaik.security.ssl.SSLException: Peer sent alert: Alert Fatal: handshake failure.
    Does anybody have some Idea of this ??
    Regards
    Naina

    Hi,
    I guess the problem is not with Variable Substitution..
    Error when getting an FTP connection from connection pool:
    So its a connection problem..
    Also check the option Disable Security check and try again...
    Try to check again if the interface is executing properly without Variable substitution and let us know..
    Babu
    Edited by: hlbabu123 on Jan 7, 2011 2:46 PM

  • Connection error when using automatic logon option in connection wizard

    Hi,
    When using the automatic logon option in the connection wizard there is an error that say that the connection cannot be established. If I use the option to type in my credentials then it works fine.
    The user has access privileges in SAP BPC.
    Any suggestions?
    Kind regards,
    Christof

    The installation of BPC server was done with a domain user or with a local user?
    Your windows user is a domain user or a local user?
    I'm asking because it is strange that Windows authentication is not working. It can be or bvecause Windows user is not the same with BPC user. (you can have the same name for user but actually one is local the other one is domain which means different users).
    Also I tsuggest to check into application server of test and prod environment f osoft virtual directory has enable Windows Authentication.
    Regards
    Sorin Radulescu

  • Getting error when using the "/parameter" switch in command line run

    Has anyone experienced this problem before?
    My report queries over 100,000 records from a view. When the report is run from the command line every thing works fine.
    But when I add a condition using a "parameter", although the report still runs fine from the destop, when launched from the command line it errs.
    "Oracle Discoverer Desktop has encountered a problem and needs to close. ..."
    "The instruction at "0x0044397c" referenced memory at "0x0000004e". The memory cound not be "read"...."
    I'm guessing its a memory issue with my PC. I've tested using a parameter with other reports using fewer records and it doesn't err from the command line.
    I can work around the issue by not using a parameter but then I have 20 versions of the same report each with a different condition.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Lise McGillis

    Hi Michael,
    I'm using an DELL Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.00 GHz with 1 GB of RAM. We use Microsoft Windows XP Prof version 2002.
    As for Discoverer we are using 10G, Desktop Client 10.1.2.48.18 - 1047500 KB available memory , 2099744 KB Free disk space.
    I'm not sure I have acess to a computer with more RAM but I'm looking into it.
    What I'm frustrated by is the fact that the parameter works fine when run directly from the desktop but when passed from the command line it bombs... but only when dealing with mega records.
    Lise.

  • Document Splitting Error when using "Difference Posting" field in F-28/F-32

    We use the "difference postings" field to post unapplied cash when we receive customer payments.  We can normally post this without issue, but occassionally we get the "Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 002 not filled" message.  This only happens when applying cash to a large count of open invoices (to clear or to partially pay) and have a balance that will not be applied to a known invoice.
    I have looked extensively for configuration issues and I must be missing something.
    Thanks in advance,
    Kevin

    The difference postings and partial payments post to document type DZ which is configured properly.
    The config is set for PC splitting.
    While I have some cash gl accounts defaulted to a PC, I am trying to avoid defaulting the reconcilliation accounts to a PC at this point.  I will only do that if there is no other solution to this issue.  But that is a suggestion that I am fairly positive would work.
    Thanks,
    Kevin

  • Error when using VML functions of Intel MKL v9.0 with LabVIEW 8.2.1

    Hi,
    I have created a DLL in Visual Studio 2005 which uses functions from the Intel Math Kernel Library (MKL) v9.0. The DLL works perfectly when I run it in VS 2005, but when I use it in the LabVIEW environment, I receive the error 1097 [An exception occurred within the external code called by a Call Library Function Node.].
    It seems that the VML function vdPowX(), which raises each element of a vector
    to the constant power, creates an access violation reading at location 0x00000000.
    Unhandled exception at 0x0652d545 (OptimisationDLL_Intel.dll) in LabVIEW.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x00000000.
    When I trace it with VS2005, it seems to read at 0x00 when they check for the mode of the function (HA or LA) to see if the function will uses High Accuracy or Low Accuracy. You can reproduce the bug by simply trying to read the Mode with the Intel Function vmlGetMode().
    I'm not sure why I only get the crash in LabVIEW and not in VS2005. The other function from the MKL that I use, daSum(), works correctly in VS2005 and LabVIEW. It doesn't have an accuracy mode since it's not in the VML family, that's probably why.
    I've included the source code in C that causes the crash when the DLL is used in LabVIEW (Corellation_Intel.c).
    When you attach the LabVIEW process to Visual Studio Debug mode, the execution stops at eax,dword ptr [edx+ecx*4]:
    _mkl_vml_core_w7_vml_GetMode:
    023D528C  mov         ecx,dword ptr [__tls_index (240EA0Ch)]
    023D5292  mov         edx,dword ptr fs:[2Ch]
    023D5299  mov         eax,dword ptr [edx+ecx*4]
    Anyone had this kind of error or have any idea what I might have done wrong? I uses mkl_c.lib and libguide.lib libraries in the i32 of Intel MKL.
    Thanks a lot for your help and feel free to contact me if you need more information.
    Regards,
    Mat
    Attachments:
    Corellation_Intel.c ‏2 KB

    Dear Mat,
    While more details are desirable to give precise answer I guess that I know the origins of the problem. VML functions are thread-safe. VML engineers use Mircosoft TLS mechanism to maintain thread safety of VML global variables. The TLS use is different for static and dynamic case. This implies that it is impossible to use MKL static library which contains TLS stuff to build dynamic library. Indeed, your DllMain function must have VML TLS initialization/processing/finalization stuff (for details see http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms686997.​aspx). In case VML TLS stuff is absent in your DllMain routine you will see Access Violation on any attempt to access VML global variables.
    VML engeneers are seeking for possible solutions/workarounds. Thus far they don't see any elegant way of solving this with existing technologies. Specifically, _mkl_vml_core_w7_vml_GetMode routine does access one of VML global variables.
    There is a possibility to build custom VML DLL from static MKL library using MKL Builder Tool. The limitation is that the built DLL cannot contain non-MKL stuff (recalling DllMain issue, MKL Builder Tool cannot put into DllMain routine user's stuff).
    Feel free to go to Intel MKL web forum or contact Intel Tech Support in case you have additional questions.
    I will keep you informed.
    Regards,
    Sergey Maidanov
    Intel Corporation

  • How can I prevent a "Thread registered implicitly" error when using dlopen on a library that is built with a 3rd party library provided by FTDI?

    I build a dylib and link with FTDI's libftd2xx.1.1.12.dylib. However when I then use dlopen to load my library I get the "Thread registered implicitly" exception thrown. This is on Mountain Lion 10.8.2, using Xcode 4.5.2. I've checked FTDI, and the version I have is the current.

    I build a dylib and link with FTDI's libftd2xx.1.1.12.dylib. However when I then use dlopen to load my library I get the "Thread registered implicitly" exception thrown. This is on Mountain Lion 10.8.2, using Xcode 4.5.2. I've checked FTDI, and the version I have is the current.

  • After updating to Firefox 33.0.3 why am I getting Untrusted Connection Errors with Yahoo and Amazon?

    I have updated to Firefox 33.0.3 and now I am getting untrusted connection errors when trying to go to Yahoo.com and Amazon.com this happens with both http and https. My time is in sync. I tried deleting the cert8.db file.
    I have looked at other solutions and they have not worked. These sites were working fine on the previous version for me but now with this new update they are not working. Why hasn't Mozilla fixed this already?

    Yes I have tried the steps above. For example, When I try to get to Yahoo web site, I get this:
    This Connection is Untrusted
    You have asked Firefox to connect securely to www.yahoo.com, but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
    Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
    What Should I Do?
    If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
    www.yahoo.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided. (Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
    I do not have the option to do an exception because I can only click on the Technical Details and the Get me Out of Here button.
    As I've said in my previous post, I have deleted the cert8.db file, my clock is in sync, and I have tried to do the other solutions but they have not worked.

  • When using google and you do a new search it goes back to previous search only happens with fireox

    when using google and you do a new search it goes back to previous search only happens with fireox

    Try to connect to iTunes during the setup.

  • Run time error when using search

    I get a run time error when using the search in iTunes store. Running current iTunes version.

    Duplicate post -- Client ADI display A runtime error in Office 2010

  • I have been getting a "Untrusted Connection" error on Firefox randomly for the past 4 weeks, what could be causing it?

    For the past about 4 weeks I've have been randomly getting an untrusted connection error whenever i try to search something on google.com or using the google search bar. It will happen for about 5-10 mins then will go away. This will happen across 3 different computers (both mac and pc) and will also happen on Chrome, sometimes at the same time sometimes different times. I've searched around and tried pretty much everything i can think of. The date/time is correct on all computers, cache has been cleared, everythings up to date, contacted the ISP and the router companies and they say its not them so i'm at a complete loss.
    Any advice or help would be much appreciated!

    Did you check the issuer of the certificate and other details?
    You can retrieve the certificate and check details like who issued certificates and expiration dates of certificates.
    *Click the link at the bottom of the error page: "I Understand the Risks"
    Let Firefox retrieve the certificate: "Add Exception" -> "Get Certificate".
    *Click the "View..." button and inspect the certificate and check who is the issuer of the certificate.
    You can see more Details like intermediate certificates that are used in the Details pane.
    If <b>"I Understand the Risks"</b> is missing then this page may be opened in an (i)frame and in that case try the right-click context menu and use "This Frame: Open Frame in New Tab".
    *Note that it is not recommended to add a permanent exception in cases like this, so only use it to inspect the certificate.

  • Why am I getting a "connection error" when trying to buy a paid app in the Mac App Store?

    Okay, so I am currently running OS X Mountain Lion on a brand new Macbook Pro 15 inch (early 2013). I haven't had any problems so far. However, today I tried buying a $10 app in the app store, and when I put in my login credentials to validate the purchase, it showed a loading wheel for about five minutes, then showed in red text, "Connection Error," just below the login fields. I've researched this issue and found it to be a bug in Lion... but no solutions for Mountain Lion. Any ideas?
    I tried doing the thing with the Keychain Access, but there were no blue pluses under "Certificates." I should also mention that my network connection is fine.
    Thanks in advance fellow Apple dudes!

    If you have more than one user account, these instructions must be carried out as an administrator.
    Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
    Select "/var/log/install.log" from the file list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
    View ▹ Show Log List
    from the menu bar. Then select the messages from the last installation or update attempt, starting from the time when you initiated it. If you're not sure when that was, start over and note the time. Copy them to the Clipboard (command-C). Paste into a reply to this message (command-V).
    If there are runs of repeated messages, post only one example of each. Don’t post many repetitions of the same message.
    When posting a log extract, be selective. Don't post more than is requested.
    Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
    Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Edit it out by search-and-replace in a text editor before posting.

  • How do I stop firefox from redirecting every page I click on in Google search? No matter what I search for in Google when I click on it Firefox redirects me to some other search, sales, or contest page.

    How do I stop firefox from redirecting every page I click on in Google search? No matter what I search for in Google when I click on it Firefox redirects me to some other search, sales, or contest page. I have a security program running, no maleware, adware, or virus on my pc. Thanks for the help in advance.

    Sounds like a dose of search redirect malware or a redirect virus.
    Install, update, and run these programs in this order. They are listed in order of efficacy.<br />'''''(Not all programs detect the same Malware, so you may need to run them all to solve your problem.)''''' <br />These programs are all free for personal use, but some have limited functionality in the "free mode" - but those are features you really don't need to find and remove the problem that you have.<br />
    ''Note: If your Malware infection is bad enough and you are mis-directed to URL's other than what is posted, you may have to use a different PC to download these programs and use a USB stick to transfer them to the afflicted PC.''
    Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware - [http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php] <br />
    SuperAntispyware - [http://www.superantispyware.com/] <br />
    AdAware - [http://www.lavasoftusa.com/software/adaware/] <br />
    Spybot Search & Destroy - [http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html] <br />
    Windows Defender: Home Page - [http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx]<br />
    Also, if you have a search engine re-direct problem, see this:<br />
    http://deletemalware.blogspot.com/2010/02/remove-google-redirect-virus.html
    If these don't find it or can't clear it, post in one of these forums for specialized malware removal help: <br />
    [http://www.spywarewarrior.com/index.php] <br />
    [http://forum.aumha.org/] <br />
    [http://www.spywareinfoforum.com/] <br />
    [http://bleepingcomputer.com]

  • Error when using PPR in the OA page developed.

    HI,
    We are encountering an error when using PPR for the custom OA page being developed. I am using JDeveloper version 9.0.3.5(Build 1437) and Oracle Applications version 11.5.10.CU2. The scenario we are using PPR and the steps to reproduce the issue is mentioned below,
    Scenario:
    1) PPR is enabled for a custom OA page that is developed.
    2) The PPR is being used to enable or disable a particular field based on the
    selection of a value in a poplist in the same OA Page.
    Error replication steps:
    1) The user enters a value in the primary mandatory field which has to have
    unique value.
    2) The user selects a value from the poplist of a field which has PPR associated.
    3) The user enters data in all other mandatory fields in the OA page except one
    and tries to save the form and is shown a error message saying that all
    mandatory fields are not entered(This is correct). Now the page gets
    automatically refreshed and so the entered values are wiped off.
    4) Now if the user again enters a value in the primary mandatory field (as in
    step1) and if that value happens to be already existing value and then select
    a value from the poplist which has PPR enabled then immediately the error
    "Please enter a unique value" is entered, though we did not save the record.
    The unique record validation would happen only at the time of saving the
    record as per out business logic.
    5) But if in Step 4 if i had entered a unique value again then the above said error
    does not happen. There are few more similar kind of issues happening in the
    same page because PPR is enabled.
    Please note that this issue happens only when the page is deployed in a oracle
    applications instance and not in JDeveloper.
    Would this issue because of some cacheing problem? If Yes then how do we resolve it? Or would it be some other problem caused by our internal coding.
    Any inputs for resolving this issue would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks, Raja.

    What works in Jdeveloper should work when deployed in iAS as well.
    And PPR is an old feature given quite enough time to mature, so before we suspect OA we should investigate the code. What I do not understand is how the page refreshes in Step 3 and why does the user have to re-enter the fields just because he missed entering one mandatory field the last time.
    Mandatory field validations are client validations set by making the fields 'Required'. You obviously have client validations turned off on your PPR, otherwise you would be stuck with a javascript popup on PPR. The only way you can get the "Please enter unique..." error on PPR is Server Validation. So where have you placed this validation? If it is not in the EO, is it in the AM? And are you unconditionally calling the AM validation method in your processFormRequest? The PPR will also go through processFormRequest so I hope the PPR event is in a different if-else block.

Maybe you are looking for

  • MacPro Crash

    Hey All, We have a Quad 3.0 Mac Pro that we are weekly editing an hour long show on. Our projects are ntsc dv projects with the bulk of the footage captured from a Sony DSR 25 Dvcam deck. The problem we are running into is that each of these projects

  • Update ios8.1 - and then it had a completely different Apple ID associated with my phone? I'm very confused.

    I was wondering if someone could explain how this could occur. I attemed the update (ios 8.1) and it ended abruptly which caused my phone to need to be restored. I attempted to do this and when completed and putting in my information, the phone's itu

  • Advanced Replication between Oracle XE and 64-bit Oracle Enterprise

    hi all, Currently i have advanced replication working between Oracle-XE and our 32-bit based Oracle 10gR2 Enterprise Server. Will advanced replication work if we moved our Enterprise 10gR2 instance from a 32-bit to a 64-bit? May be some of you might

  • Having problem with midi?

    I am having problem with midi keyboard (korg pa80) I having hard time to midi to logic every time I have to either restart the logic or restart the keyboard or plug out the USB cable and put back in order to work. Plus when I created a new track doen

  • BAM and Firefox (non IE)

    What is the plan for BAM and support for non IE browsers? The server broke the MS barrier with 11g - but what about the clients?