Unwanted Arpeggio In Logic 8?

I'm having a rather frustrating problem with Logic 8, I'm getting unwanted arpeggio via midi and cannot seem to find a way to stop it. It's only occurring when the track is playing and only appears to be in this specific arrangement all my other tracks are fine.
I've checked the midi environment and there is no arp set up there.
Anyone have any ideas?
Many thanks in advance

if I must rewind the tape history of that, you both with Eric were quite rude regarding my personalty
I was quite polite at first and respectfully asked you to try a bit harder to be appropiately helpful - you took this as an attack which is wasn't meant to be at all, but I admit that you wound me up and I responded a little more annoyed than I should be. Well, I'm human. If you'll notice since then, I have made no direct personal insults at you, and yet you continue to do so, to me, and other members of the forum.
I will not quote you, you know that you do this. And I'm asking you to stop, because it does you no favours. This is not just me, there are plenty of posts shocked at your rudeness from other members too.
which was a sign of your madness about some of my skills I guess.
Indeed - your communication skills. Nothing to do with Logic, I never had any doubt you knew what you were talking about - and no, that doesn't threaten me in the slightest. I like smart (friendly) people. And knowledge doesn't threaten me one bit - in fact, I'd far rather hang out with people far smarter than me than hang out with people far dumber than me and feel superior to them. I like learning stuff from people far more talented than me.
I'm using an intelligent way to fill your gabs (following the forum agreements) and provide quite professional schemes and tools which are far away of your dreams inc extra information, images, template hosting etc, which in most cases are quite useful if you read the users feedback ...
Once again, as I've said many times before, you provide good correct information and are clearly helpful and in this regard your posts and contributions are welcome here. Your personal attacks are not. SImple as.
I see that you both are somehow injured about anybody's "phantom superiority".
What I can offer you is to post in some other forums.
sigh
In this case, you will may find out that there are some very knowledgeable guys who post quite many schemes, give too many personal professional advices etc
Yep - and this is great!
if you blame these specialists using a quite rude way into "superiority", the result be - you will be banned form the forum. In many cases the "superiority" guys are the forum moderators as well
What's sharing information and being helpful got to do with being rude? You've lost me. Rudeness is not something to be admired no matter how good someone may be. Some forums, particularly some US-based audio forums, can be harsh, I agree. But this isn't rec.audio.pro, or Marsh, or the Womb, and the TOU of the forum ask you to play as adults - I would hope we all can manage that.
I'm asking you (politely) one final time to cut the attitude here please.

Similar Messages

  • Unwanted sounds when logic plays from the start of the track!!! help!!

    i would really appreciate if anybody helps me here!
    i have logic rewired with reason. i have numerous tracks and instruments on both
    all my drums are in reason and when i play the tracks back in logic i get an unwanted kick and a crash at the point i start the song, this happens anywhere between the count in and the first audio in logic.
    whe i play it back from the start in reason i dont get these sounds, only when i play it from logic!
    there is definately no loose midi data in reason(as there is no place for it ) and i have had draw a long count out in logic just so the track starts after these sounds have faded away?
    any advise???

    Correction:
    This has happened to me lots too, to sessions where I am using a lot of virtual instruments. I don't think you issue has anything to do with ReWire.
    I think it has to do with stopping a song before it ends, returning to the start and playing song again. It has to do with lookahead and ram etc ....
    The way to avoid this is to back your song start up, or nudge your tracks forward a bit. One bar or less seems to do the trick for me.
    Hope that helps.
    Cheers
    Dee

  • Unwanted feedback on logic 7  -  hidden track?

    I'm working on a project and at 1:15 from when i play the song, an unwanted feedback starts and gets louder and louder. i've muted and soloed all the tracks, ive watched the mixer, ive moved the whole project up and back a couple of minutes. it doesn't matter where i start the song, at one minute and fifteen seconds into it a feedback starts and overcomes all other tracks. help!

    it didn't show up in the environment mixer
    This is impossible. If it's in your bounce file, then it's in your mixer. It's probably happening on one of the existing channels that has audio on, and you are just not recognising it.
    Also check that you haven't got your Powerbook internal mic switched on and feeding into the Mac's audio (although this would not show up in your bounce file.)
    And lastly, Logic 7 questions are best dealt with in the Logic 7 forum, not the Logic 8 one, so the advice given is applicable.

  • Logic Pro X Notation for whole bar note makes unwanted ties

    For some reason, one bar of my score, which is a single chord sustained for the full bar, is notating as a dotted quarter-note tied to a sixteenth=note tied to another sixteenth-note tied to a half note. The previous bar is identical, but notates as a whole note.
    I've deleted the notes, and I get rests of the same values. Why is Logic chopping the bar up like this? How do I make it notate a whole note?
    Any help much appreciated. It's driving me crazy!
    Robert

    OK, Thanks.
    I've already posted the notation. Here's the Piano Roll.
    As I said above, I deleted the notes and the rests were then notated the same tied values instead of being a full bar rest.
    I copied and paste the notes from bar 35 (notated as whole notes) to bar 36 ... and they notate with ties.
    Robert

  • Logic bounces unwanted audio when exporting audio to movie

    Hey all,
    So as the title says, Logic seems to be bouncing a few tracks that i've now completely deleted from the Logic project. I even removed them from the bin.
    Every time I try to export audio to movie these audio tracks come up in the exported .mov. I have no clue why this is happening. Any thoughts?

    Hi
    Are these audio tracks that were/are embedded in the movie?
    When bouncing to a (new) movie, these audio tracks are automatically included unless you opt out (de-select them).
    CCT

  • Unwanted modulation Logic pro9

    I just loaded a new project into Logic 9 on my new iMac to begin with all was well, then it started to introduce pitch shift similar to 'wow' in analog recordings. I couldn't get rid of it and in the end had to reload one ported over from my laptop.
    Any ideas? The only changes made apart from a bit of EQ were loading AU Garritan instruments. This had been done for all the other tracks in the project without incident.

    Do you have enabled  SpeedFades instead of crossfades?
    I tink, we need more information, where the "wow" does come from. Is it from an audio recording (speed fades?) or software instrument (pitch bend data?).
    Best,
    DaCaptain

  • Is there a way to record just the arpeggios and not the notes being played?

    I am recording the Arpeggios from my Motif rack ES into Logic Pro 7.2 in midi format but when I try to do this, the notes that I play on the keyboard also get recorded along with the arpeggios? Is there a way to record just what's coming out of the midi out (of motif rack es) and not the keys that you are pressing to kick off the arpeggio?

    Either check your Motif's owners manual to see if you can disable the keys or make sure the keys are out of the arpeggio's range and use a transform object in the environment to filter out the unwanted notes.
    jord

  • LSMW: Error concerning the logical path in Specify Files step

    Hi,
    I am trying on an ECC 6.0 EHP6 system to upload (open) POs from an existing SAP ERP system. Since I faced some complications in batch input recording method, I decided to go with the standard batch/direct input method.
    I selected object 0085 (Purchase Order) and method 0001 (Purchase Order). The program that is used is RM06EEI0. I followed all the usual steps, but in the "Specify Files" step I get the message:
    '****.lsmw.conv' does not exist; edit the logical path using transaction FILE
    Being aware of both the FILE and SF01 transactions, I created the logical path and file (through the FILE transaction). However, after the modification, I get the message:
    Logical file '****' is not assigned to physical file '****.lsmw.conv'
    There is also the related SAP Note 753511 (Logical and physical path and file name in transaction LSMW) that refers to this case.

    Hi,
    Click on specify file radio button>Legacy data-on the PC Front end
    where input file location like C:\mydocument\desktop\test.txt
    and give input in Name field: mydocument
    in delimiter section > select Tabular
    File structure section> tick on Field order matches source structure definition
    File type: Record end marker(Text file)
    then press enter key and other steps as same.
    Second thing you said that you have used Batch input recording
    after creation and recording finish , scroll the page below on recording and put a cursor unwanted field and remove unwanted input field.
    I hope your problem will resolve. you can find the steps pdf on Google search try now.
    Thanks
    Sanjeet Kumar

  • LSMW - Logical Path/File - No logical path has been specified

    Hello,
    I am trying to create a LSMW with the RM06EEI0 direct input program for ME21N transaction.
    At the SpecifyFiles step I get the error message "No logical path has been specified".
    My dilemmas are:
    1. How can I solve this error? Is the FILE transaction only solution? If yes, where and how I must define the logical path/file?
    2. Why in the case of the Batch Input Recording LSMW Method this files are created automatically? (I can see them in the AL11 transaction and I didn't define them by myself).
    3. Why on other system this error is just an warning message? If you look at this tutorial  http://****************/Tutorials/LSMW/PO/Page4.htm at Step7.g. you can see that there is no need of defining the file/path in FILE transaction.
    More info about the system I am working in:
    SAP ECC 6.0.
    LSMW 4.0.0. Version.
    Thank you.
    Daniela

    Hi
    Refer the oss note 753511 released for this kind of error you face in LSMW, I am pasting the content of the note below,
    ******************Note Content,
    Symptom
    The system issues an error message for the logical path or file when you perform the "Specify files" step in the Legacy System Migration Workbench (transaction LSMW) although you have made the correct assignment in transaction FILE.
    The error messages are as follows:
    The logical path <PATH> does not point to the physical directory.
    The logical file <FILE> is not assigned to the physical file.
    or
    A logical path was not specified.
    Other terms
    Logical path, logical file, transaction FILE, LSM Workbench
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Some import interfaces that you can also use with transaction LSMW work with logical path and file names.
    Transaction LSMW itself, however, works with physical file names. To be able to transfer the LSMW file with the converted data to the import program, you must specify a logical file name for the file with the converted data in addition to the physical file name. In this case, the system displays additional fields in the 'Specify files' step in which you must enter the logical path and file name.
    Solution
    The error messages may be due to several causes. Check the following:
    Have you maintained the logical path and logical file name and have you assigned them to the physical file specified in the "File" input field of transaction LSMW?
    These settings are maintained in transaction FILE.
    When you use logical file and path names, you must specify the name of the physical file with its path. If you have not specified any directory, you cannot assign any directory to the logical path in transaction FILE. In this case, the system uses the SAP Home directory on the application server by default. Bear in mind that the file name must not exceed the maximum length of 45 characters, including the path.
    Up to LSMW version 1.7.2 (*):
    If the logical file name specified does not point to the physical file (although it should do), the system adjusts the logical file name, that is, the information in transaction FILE is changed to the entries made in transaction LSMW. This may lead to unwanted side effects if the logical file is also used somewhere else. Therefore, SAP recommend that you always use separate logical paths and file names for transaction LSMW (the problem is corrected as of LSMW version 1.8.0, see below). If the logical file does not exist yet, it will be created upon request.
    As of LSMW version 1.8.0 (*):
    The settings of the logical file are checked but no longer adjusted automatically as in version 1.7.2 (see above). If there are inconsistencies, the system issues an error message. If the user is authorized to maintain logical paths and file names (as for transaction FILE: "Maintenance authorization for cross-client tables"), transaction LSMW can create the logical path, the file name and the file. Due to this automatic generation, the user no longer needs to make adjustments in transaction FILE. Therefore, we especially recommend this procedure.
    To display the version of transaction LSMW, select "Extras" --> "Display LSMW version" in the main menu of the initial screen.
    You should also bear in mind that as of Basis Release 6.20, that is, as of LSMW version 4.0, transaction LSMW is no longer an add-on but is delivered with the standard system.
    Hope this helps,
    Sunil

  • LSMW : Unable to Specify Files . Logical path incorrect ?

    Hi Guys,
    I am trying to upload Goods movement Using the Standard LSMW 0110 program RM07MMBL.
    When I try to execute the step Specify Files ,system displays an error message "No Logical Path specified."
    The Source File is in my Local PC .
    When I click the Converted Data File in the Specify files list
    I get a popup which asks me for a Logical path and a Logical File and both these parameters a mandatory.
    I tried to maintain the parameters and entries in transaction FILE also.
    But it says 'logical path not assigned to the physical directory.'
    What is the correct method for this.
    What steps should I follow ..
    Pls advice
    Message was edited by: hao fu

    Hi,
      Refer the oss note 753511 released for this kind of error you face in LSMW, I am pasting the content of the note below,
    ******************Note Content,
    Symptom
    The system issues an error message for the logical path or file when you perform the "Specify files" step in the Legacy System Migration Workbench (transaction LSMW) although you have made the correct assignment in transaction FILE.
    The error messages are as follows:
    The logical path <PATH> does not point to the physical directory.
    The logical file <FILE> is not assigned to the physical file.
    or
    A logical path was not specified.
    Other terms
    Logical path, logical file, transaction FILE, LSM Workbench
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Some import interfaces that you can also use with transaction LSMW work with logical path and file names.
    Transaction LSMW itself, however, works with physical file names. To be able to transfer the LSMW file with the converted data to the import program, you must specify a logical file name for the file with the converted data in addition to the physical file name. In this case, the system displays additional fields in the 'Specify files' step in which you must enter the logical path and file name.
    Solution
    The error messages may be due to several causes. Check the following:
    Have you maintained the logical path and logical file name and have you assigned them to the physical file specified in the "File" input field of transaction LSMW?
    These settings are maintained in transaction FILE.
    When you use logical file and path names, you must specify the name of the physical file with its path. If you have not specified any directory, you cannot assign any directory to the logical path in transaction FILE. In this case, the system uses the SAP Home directory on the application server by default. Bear in mind that the file name must not exceed the maximum length of 45 characters, including the path.
    Up to LSMW version 1.7.2 (*):
    If the logical file name specified does not point to the physical file (although it should do), the system adjusts the logical file name, that is, the information in transaction FILE is changed to the entries made in transaction LSMW. This may lead to unwanted side effects if the logical file is also used somewhere else. Therefore, SAP recommend that you always use separate logical paths and file names for transaction LSMW (the problem is corrected as of LSMW version 1.8.0, see below). If the logical file does not exist yet, it will be created upon request.
    As of LSMW version 1.8.0 (*):
    The settings of the logical file are checked but no longer adjusted automatically as in version 1.7.2 (see above). If there are inconsistencies, the system issues an error message. If the user is authorized to maintain logical paths and file names (as for transaction FILE: "Maintenance authorization for cross-client tables"), transaction LSMW can create the logical path, the file name and the file. Due to this automatic generation, the user no longer needs to make adjustments in transaction FILE. Therefore, we especially recommend this procedure.
    To display the version of transaction LSMW, select "Extras" --> "Display LSMW version" in the main menu of the initial screen.
    You should also bear in mind that as of Basis Release 6.20, that is, as of LSMW version 4.0, transaction LSMW is no longer an add-on but is delivered with the standard system.
    Hope this helps,
    Rgds,

  • Selection screen and logical database PNP

    hi all,
    I am having a requirement to produce a HR Report where i need to use logical database PNP. Now the issue is i need to supress some of the elements of standard selection screen of PNP and add a couple of fields of mine.
    i have been looking all around and i got few of the below methods.
    its good to use a report category.
    somewhere it says include it in ur program using selection screen block..
    can you please guide me which is the best way and what would be a perfect solution?
    thanks in advance,
    Reena

    In the Program Attributes, click on the pushbutton 'HR Report Category'.Click on the 'Create' icon in the pop-up  window that comes up. You will get a list of all the available Report Categories. Go through the list & if you don't find one that suits you, select one that is closest & click on the 'Copy As' icon in the menu bar..
    Now, you can remove the unwanted fields & add yours for selection. save it & and attach it to report in the attributes.
    ~Suresh

  • Logical standby DB with unsupported datatype

    Hello,
    Has anyone setup the following Data Guard Configuration, although it is not recommended by Oracle:-
    Setup a logical standby DB from a Primary DB with unsupported Data Types. I'm need (and want) to save time and effort to configure a database for the purpose of Reporting and avoid Oracle Streams or Change Data Capture or even the new middleware Product Data Integrator
    Data is sent from the Productive DB, and with logical standby DB, I (hope) can still get it to run even with unsupported data types using DBMS_LOGSTDBY.SKIP procedure, to skip unwanted and unsupported attributes in the primary DB.
    I would appreciate any comments and experience using Logical Standby DB for Reporting Purposes.
    regards
    Sahba

    Hello Anantha,
    thanks for your reply.
    unfortunately the Productive database uses dartatypes such as DMSYS.SDO_GEOMERTY.
    these datatypes are not supported by the Logical standby DB.
    I thought, i could skip those tables with such datatypes when applying redodata in the logical standby db, dbms_logstdby.skip procedure allow such mechanism.
    the reason why i need logical stndby db ist due to READ/WRITE during apply process. as I mentioned, i need an up-to-date replica of the productive db for reporting purposes, without such tables with unsupported datatpes. because these are tables are not part of the reporting procedure, i thought of skipping them from appling in logical stndby db .
    so, has anyone have had any complications with Logical stndby db even when using dbms_logstdby.skip procedure?
    are there any other problems encountered with logical stndby db to share here?
    thanks
    regards
    Sahba

  • SolMan 4.0: SMSY: Delete unwanted landscape from Solution Landscapes

    Hello there everyone,
    Previously, my colleague and I have created a few solution landscapes in SMSY -> System Groups and Logical Components -> Solution Landscapes - Operation.
    We were experimenting as we're new to SolMan 4.0.
    Problem now is, we cannot find the button to delete off those unwanted solution landscapes. When right-click on a landscape, it only shows 'Display' or 'Change'.
    Is there anyway to delete within SMSY?
    Many, many thanks in advanced. =)
    Warmest regards,
    Eva

    Hi,
    Its simple.
    You should create a where-used list before you delete systems, servers or databases....
    1.You cannot delete an object you are editing, if you are in change mode. Go to display mode.
    Choose Landscape Components-->Other Object…
    2.Search for the landscape element to be deleted, in the possible entries help.
    3.Choose Delete.
    4.Confirm the confirmation prompt.
    The landscape element and all its uses are deleted.
    Check this link also.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm40/helpdata/en/03/07b4e75eee423aafab88354306eafc/content.htm
    Feel Free to revert Back.
    --Ragu

  • Working with Multiple Videos in Logic a Pain !!!

    Hi,
    I find that working with videos in logic is still quite primitive as compared to Protools. I like working with logic, even in post production but working with videos has been a real pain for me.
    In PT, you are able to add in several videos in one arrange page and edit the length of the videos to remove unwanted frames such as the black frames etc. It makes it easy to bounce when you can just click on the video in the arrange and bounce the particular segment in the precise time length of the video.
    But in Logic, I have to add all the videos in imovie, then export them out to DVPAL, then adding them in logic. This can take a really long time. Say i have a new revised video for one several compiled videos, i then have to repeat the whole process all over again. After which the starting time location of the video changes and i'll have to move everything in my arrange page. In PT you can just replace the particular video file and nothing else changes.
    Bouncing is also difficult in Logic when you can't maintain the starting time of the videos uniform. There are many times when I have to zoom in really find to the start time of video then start dragging the loop region and then do the same to the end. In PT, just click on the video and bounce. Done!
    I find working with Videos in Logic for Post Production for Advertising is such a pain. And I don't want to change to Protools cause i still love logic. I really think Apple will have to do something about this to be a competitive Post Production and Engineering platform. As for working with Music Logic is still sweet.
    Anyone else using logic as a Engineering Platform feeling the same way?
    Is there a better way to work with videos in Logic?
    Cheers,
    Kitcheren

    I can't believe there isn't a lot more talk about video in Logic. I have been using LP7 for music-to-picute for years until now that I have switched to 9. The way Logic 9 interacts with video has changed and I find it really hard to find exactly where the frames are in relation to the audio. It seems that the video window only approximately updates as you advance in the timeline by frames. Can anyone confirm that? Isn't anyone doing music for picture in Logic? I'm also kinda hooked on Logic and not in any mood to go back to PT, but today I nearly had a heart attack trying to get some music to match. My exports weren't looking the same as my project etc... I was horrified at the idea of telling my client that I can't figure out how to sync the picture! I wound up sending the mix and movie to a friend to line things up... not pretty.

  • Syncing AkaiPro Mini to Logic's tempo

    Just bought the Akai Mini http://www.akaipro.com/mpkmini for it's flexible arpeggio feature. It's supposed to be able to allow the tempo in Logic to determine the tempo of the arpeggio, but I can't figure out how to make that happen. The manual, naturally, doesn't make this clear at all. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks...

    For the record, I found the answer on YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck1OOXEOY3Q
    As he explains, you have to
    Go into the Logic project's "Settings."
    Select "Syncronization."
    Select the "MIDI" tab
    Then, next to "Transmit MIDI Clock", check "Destination 1" and use the pulldown menu to choose your device, in my case the MPK Mini. See pic below...
    In other words, it's not enough to tell the MPK Mini to use an external clock (which you do through it's Editor software). You have to tell that clock (in this case, Logic's) to send it's signal to the MPK Mini. The "conversation" has to go both ways...
    This was helpful to me. Hope it's of some use to others!
    Hat tip to http://www.youtube.com/user/Chillerman345 for his clear and concise tutorial.

Maybe you are looking for