Update 10.4.5 too large

I am running an iMac G5 OS 10.4. I would like to download the combo update 10.4.5, but the file is too big. I live out in the country where high speed internet does not exist. So, I am using a dial-up. It would take 9 hours to download the update. Any idea if Apple will send out a CD if asked?

If you were near an Apple store you could go there, but of course since you are in the boonies of WA state that means you must be pretty far from Seattle. Are there any Apple stores in WA other than in Seattle?
By the way, I have a friend who is moving from Seattle to the Kitsap penninsula and has gotten satellite broadband in his new digs. He's keeping me posted on how it's working. If you'd like, maybe I can get a link to the particular service he's using.
Regards,
Steve M.

Similar Messages

  • I updated to iTunes 11 on my Windows PC. Since the update, when I open iTunes its window is too large for my screen. Resizing is a pain, because I have to change my screen resolution. And when I restart iTunes,it has reverted back to being too large.Help!

    I recently updated to iTunes 11 on my Windows PC. Since the update, each time I open iTunes its window is too large for my screen. Resizing it is a pain, because I have to change my screen resolution. And then when I restart iTunes, it has reverted back to being too large. Please help!

    Having the same issue here....a quick fix is to just minimize the window, and immediately maximize it.  It will now fit the screen.  Trouble is, after you close it, you'll have to do it again when you re-start itunes.  The good news is it takes all of about 2 seconds.  Apple should fix this.  Should.

  • Since updating Iphone 4 the screen display is too large

    Since updating my Iphone 4 the screen display is too large to fit on the screen. For example the green battery graphic is so large half of it takes up the full screen.
    I pressed restore and restored the phone. I then restored my backup files and I still have the same problem.
    Does anyone have any suggestions?

    This is asked and answered many,many times and is covered in the manual ( Zoom feature).
    iPhone User Guide (For iOS 4.2 and 4.3 Software)
    Double tap with three fingers

  • Got Iphone 6 updated to IOS 8.0.2, now I can't use it as everything became too large on screen and its not responding

    Got Iphone 6 updated to IOS 8.0.2, now I can't use it as everything became too large on screen and its not responding?

    Hi ka_tin,
    I apologize, I'm a bit unclear on the exact nature of the issue you are describing. If the largeness you are seeing is related to the Accessability Zoom function (a feature that allows you to zoom in on the screen for people with vision issues), you may find the following page helpful:
    Zoom - iPhone
    Regards,
    - Brenden

  • Update trigger fails with value too large for column error on timestamp

    Hello there,
    I've got a problem with several update triggers. I've several triggers monitoring a set of tables.
    Upon each update the updated data is compared with the current values in the table columns.
    If different values are detected the update timestamp is set with the current_timestamp. That
    way we have a timestamp that reflects real changes in relevant data. I attached an example for
    that kind of trigger below. The triggers on each monitored table only differ in the columns that
    are compared.
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER T_ava01_obj_cont
    BEFORE UPDATE on ava01_obj_cont
    FOR EACH ROW
    DECLARE
      v_changed  boolean := false;
    BEGIN
      IF NOT v_changed THEN
        v_changed := (:old.cr_adv_id IS NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL) OR
                     (:old.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NULL)OR
                     (:old.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :new.cr_adv_id IS NOT NULL AND :old.cr_adv_id != :new.cr_adv_id);
      END IF;
      IF NOT v_changed THEN
        v_changed := (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL) OR
                     (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NULL)OR
                     (:old.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :new.is_euzins_relevant IS NOT NULL AND :old.is_euzins_relevant != :new.is_euzins_relevant);
      END IF;
    [.. more values being compared ..]
        IF v_changed THEN
        :new.update_ts := current_timestamp;
      END IF;
    END T_ava01_obj_cont;Really relevant is the statement
    :new.update_ts := current_timestamp;So far so good. The problem is, it works the most of time. Only sometimes it fails with the following error:
    SQL state [72000]; error code [12899]; ORA-12899: value too large for column "LGT_CLASS_AVALOQ"."AVA01_OBJ_CONT"."UPDATE_TS"
    (actual: 28, maximum: 11)
    I can't see how the value systimestamp or current_timestamp (I tried both) should be too large for
    a column defined as TIMESTAMP(6). We've got tables where more updates occur then elsewhere.
    Thats where the most of the errors pop up. Other tables with fewer updates show errors only
    sporadicly or even never. I can't see a kind of error pattern. It's like that every 10.000th update
    or less failes.
    I was desperate enough to try some language dependend transformation like
    IF v_changed THEN
        l_update_date := systimestamp || '';
        select value into l_timestamp_format from nls_database_parameters where parameter = 'NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT';
        :new.update_ts := to_timestamp_tz(l_update_date, l_timestamp_format);
    END IF;to be sure the format is right. It didn't change a thing.
    We are using Oracle Version 10.2.0.4.0 Production.
    Did anyone encounter that kind of behaviour and solve it? I'm now pretty certain that it has to
    be an oracle bug. What is the forum's opinion on that? Would you suggest to file a bug report?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Kind regards
    Jan

    Could you please edit your post and use formatting and tags.  This is pretty much unreadable and the forum boogered up some of your code.
    Instructions are here: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/help.jspa                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Latest Leopard Update just too large

    The latest Leopard update is over 500 MB. This is just too large for those of us who connect via satellite. The update is so large that it throws me into Fair Access restrictions. In addition it doesn't install. It gets hung up for hours in "Configuring Software"
    It must be broken up into smaller pieces. There is just no excuse for an update being so large.
    Someone from Apple needs t read this forum and fix this. If the update contains something critical for an application or system stability, then I am hosed.

    This forum is for troubleshooting Apple Software Update for Windows, a software package for Windows designed to update Apple products that run on Windows, and not related to Mac OS updates.
    Try your local library or nearest apple authorized service provider to get the update.

  • Toolbar too large after update

    After the latest update, the tool bar and the 'Tools, sign, comments' section have become too large and occupy nearly 30% of the screen. The default display size is 150% on my PC, but still this is the first time I'm facing this issue. I did not come across any settings in the preferences area to correct this issue. Any suggestions?

    Hi,
    It seems like the UI has switched to 200%. You can fix it by following steps posted in this thread:
    Opened AR today font size in super small, went to "preferences" and so on, did changes, nothing works, what's the deal???
    I hope this helps.
    Best,
    Luc

  • Updated now library too large

    I just updated to the newest iphone os last night and now the library (photos, music, contacts, apps etc.) is 2.8gigs too large! How did that happen and how can I undo whatever happened? The phone can't complete the sync now, it locks up itunes. Is restore the only option?

    Get a large, fast external drive and put your library there, and bring it with you. Also have an up-to-date backup that you leave back at your home or office.

  • When I attempt to download the lastest OS iPhone update to iTunes, the file is too large for my internet carrier will allow.  My max is 400 MB and the file is what about 583 MB?  Options?  The same is true for the iTunes updates.

    When I attempt to download the lastest version of the iphone 4 OS update or the itunes one for the desktop, the file is too large for my internet carrier.  It will allow only a 400 MB download versus the download size of 583 MB.  Suggestions?

    You can download on your work computer, then place the file on your desktop of your home computer, if you want. Then:
    Launch iTunes
    Option+Click (Mac OS X) or Shift+Click (Windows) the Update button
    Select the IPSW update file you just placed on your desktop
    Let iTunes update your hardware to the latest version
    The .ipsw file is located here:
    Windows XP: \Documents and Settings\username\Application Data\Apple Computer\iTunes\iPhone Software Updates
    Windows Vista & Windows 7: \Users\username\AppData\Roaming\Apple Computer\iTunes\iPhone Software Updates
    You will have to turn on "Show All Hidden Files & Folders" to see it.

  • Since installing update on 6/25, printing pdf pages OK, but bank account activity type is too large for the page. How do I shrink the type?

    Since installing Firefox v.3.6. 6 update on 6/25, printing bank statements in pdf format is still OK, but when I select the print option for my bank account activity the type is too large for the page. How do I shrink the type? We are running Windows XP.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened
    == I installed Firefox update on 6/25

    Firefox doesn't display PDF files all by itself, it uses your PDF reader program which is also what handles the printing of that file type.
    As far as the large printed font from Firefox, open File > Page Setup and see what the '''Scale''' is set to. 100% is usually the best setting, but you might need to use a smaller setting.

  • LR 3.3RC : Won't update metadata to (too large ?) psd

    On XP 32 SP3
    (PSD on PS CS5 : Maximize PSD File Compatibility is on "Always" - Generate Composite was OK)
    After modification of 16b large psd file in LR 3.3RC
    I get exclamation mark in filmstrip thumbnail
    and "Sidecar File Has Conflict" in the balloon.
    "Retry Metadata Export" not effective.
    Have I reached some kind of limit?

    I don't know what caused this error, but the direct answer to your question is NO, you have not reached some sort of limit.
    I don't think there is such a thing as a too large .PSD file, and "16b" (whatever you mean by that) doesn't sound large to me.
    Are you sure you have write access to the folder containing this photo, and to the .psd file itself?

  • ACROBAT XI Pro -EDIT TOOL SET  - POP-UP WINDOW IS TOO LARGE

    Good Day -
    I've been experiencing very nagging problem since installing recent Acrobat Xi Pro uodate (on windows 7 system):
    Specifically - I cannot edit/change the TOOL SET to include needed TOOLS (i.e., that were all previously in my Tool set) as the EDIT TOOL SET WINDOW (i.e., pop-up
    window) is TOO LARGE and does not allow scrolling/ or moving down to SAVE  any tool sets and or tool set changes. Very frustrating as all attempts (and recommendations from reviews/support) for decreasing the size of EDIT TOOL SET WINDOW (popup) in order to save (i.e. include ANY) tools have been unsuccessful.  So for past week I've been unable to include/use any TOOLS for working in (i.e., editing/commenting etc) pdf's.  Has anyone else experienced this problem?  Would greatly appreciate any / all steps & recommendations for fixing.
    Thank-you!

    First, make sure you are on the latest update 11.0.09. Help->check for updates should get you there.
    If check for updates says that you have the latest, see if the setting: Edit->Settings->General->Basic Tools->Scale for screen resolution and try various options (you'll have to restart Acrobat with each selection)

  • Cannot decrypt RSA encrypted text : due to : input too large for RSA cipher

    Hi,
    I am in a fix trying to decrypt this RSA encrypted String ... plzz help
    I have the encrypted text as a String.
    This is what I do to decrypt it using the Private key
    - Determine the block size of the Cipher object
    - Get the array of bytes from the String
    - Find out how many block sized partitions I have in the array
    - Encrypt the exact block sized partitions using update() method
    - Ok, now its easy to find out how many bytes remain (using % operator)
    - If the remaining bytes is 0 then simply call the 'doFinal()'
    i.e. the one which returns an array of bytes and takes no args
    - If the remaining bytes is not zero then call the
    'doFinal(byte [] input, int offset, in inputLen)' method for the
    bytes which actually remained
    However, this doesnt work. This is making me go really crazy.
    Can anyone point out whats wrong ? Plzz
    Here is the (childish) code
    Cipher rsaDecipher = null;
    //The initialization stuff for rsaDecipher
    //The rsaDecipher Cipher is using 256 bit keys
    //I havent specified anything regarding padding
    //And, I am using BouncyCastle
    String encryptedString;
    // read in the string from the network
    // this string is encrypted using an RSA public key generated earlier
    // I have to decrypt this string using the corresponding Private key
    byte [] input = encryptedString.getBytes();
    int blockSize = rsaDecipher.getBlockSize();
    int outputSize = rsaDecipher.getOutputSize(blockSize);
    byte [] output = new byte[outputSize];
    int numBlockSizedPartitions = input.length / blockSize;
    int numRemainingBytes = input.length % blockSize;
    boolean hasRemainingBytes = false;
    if (numRemainingBytes > 0)
      hasRemainingBytes = true;
    int offset = 0;
    int inputLen = blockSize;
    StringBuffer buf = new StringBuffer();
    for (int i = 0; i < numBlockSizedPartitions; i++) {
      output = rsaDecipher.update(input, offset, blockSize);
      offset += blockSize;
      buf.append(new String(output));
    if (hasRemainingBytes) {
      //This is excatly where I get the "input too large for RSA cipher"
      //Which is suffixed with ArrayIndexOutofBounds
      output = rsaDecipher.doFinal(input,offset,numRemainingBytes);
    } else {
      output = rsaDecipher.doFinal();
    buf.append(new String(output));
    //After having reached till here, will it be wrong if I assumed that I
    //have the properly decrypted string ???

    Hi,
    I am in a fix trying to decrypt this RSA encrypted
    String ... plzz helpYou're already broken at this point.
    Repeat after me: ciphertext CANNOT be safely represented as a String. Strings have internal structure - if you hand ciphertext to the new String(byte[]) constructor, it will eat your ciphertext and leave you with garbage. Said garbage will fail to decrypt in a variety of puzzling fashions.
    If you want to transmit ciphertext as a String, you need to use something like Base64 to encode the raw bytes. Then, on the receiving side, you must Base64-DEcode back into bytes, and then decrypt the resulting byte[].
    Second - using RSA as a general-purpose cipher is a bad idea. Don't do that. It's slow (on the order of 100x slower than the slowest symmetric cipher). It has a HUGE block size (governed by the keysize). And it's subject to attack if used as a stream-cipher (IIRC - I can no longer find the reference for that, so take it with a grain of salt...) Standard practice is to use RSA only to encrypt a generated key for some symmetric algorithm (like, say, AES), and use that key as a session-key.
    At any rate - the code you posted is broken before you get to this line:byte [] input = encryptedString.getBytes();Go back to the encrypting and and make it stop treating your ciphertext as a String.
    Grant

  • SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column

    Hi,
    I'm trying to understand the above error. It occurs when we are migrating data from one oracle database to another:
    Error report:
    SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column "USER_XYZ"."TAB_XYZ"."COL_XYZ" (actual: 10, maximum: 8)
    12899. 00000 - "value too large for column %s (actual: %s, maximum: %s)"
    *Cause:    An attempt was made to insert or update a column with a value
    which is too wide for the width of the destination column.
    The name of the column is given, along with the actual width
    of the value, and the maximum allowed width of the column.
    Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
    semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
    reported in bytes.
    *Action:   Examine the SQL statement for correctness.  Check source
    and destination column data types.
    Either make the destination column wider, or use a subset
    of the source column (i.e. use substring).
    The source database runs - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
    The target database runs - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    The source and target table are identical and the column definitions are exactly the same. The column we get the error on is of CHAR(8). To migrate the data we use either a dblink or oracle datapump, both result in the same error. The data in the column is a fixed length string of 8 characters.
    To resolve the error the column "COL_XYZ" gets widened by:
    alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(10));
    -alter table TAB_XYZ succeeded.
    We now move the data from the source into the target table without problem and then run:
    select max(length(COL_XYZ)) from TAB_XYZ;
    -8
    So the maximal string length for this column is 8 characters. To reduce the column width back to its original 8, we then run:
    alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(8));
    -Error report:
    SQL Error: ORA-01441: cannot decrease column length because some value is too big
    01441. 00000 - "cannot decrease column length because some value is too big"
    *Cause:   
    *Action:
    So we leave the column width at 10, but the curious thing is - once we have the data in the target table, we can then truncate the same table at source (ie. get rid of all the data) and move the data back in the original table (with COL_XYZ set at CHAR(8)) - without any issue.
    My guess the error has something to do with the storage on the target database, but I would like to understand why. If anybody has an idea or suggestion what to look for - much appreciated.
    Cheers.

    843217 wrote:
    Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
    semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
    reported in bytes.You are looking at character lengths vs byte lengths.
    The data in the column is a fixed length string of 8 characters.
    select max(length(COL_XYZ)) from TAB_XYZ;
    -8
    So the maximal string length for this column is 8 characters. To reduce the column width back to its original 8, we then run:
    alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(8));varchar2(8 byte) or varchar2(8 char)?
    Use SQL Reference for datatype specification, length function, etc.
    For more info, reference {forum:id=50} forum on the topic. And of course, the Globalization support guide.

  • Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration

    Hi,
    While executing query for a given period, 'Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration' message is getting displayed. I had searched in SDN and I had referred the following link:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/d047e1a1-ad5d-2c10-5cb1-f4ff99fc63c4&overridelayout=true
    Steps followed:
    1) Transaction Code SE38
    2) In the program field, entered the report name SAP_RSADMIN_MAINTAIN and Executed.
    3) For OBJECT, entered the following parameters: BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_MAX
    4) For VALUE, entered the value for the size of the result set, and then executed the program:
    After the said steps, the below message is displayed:
    OLD SETTING:
    OBJECT =                                VALUE =
    UPDATE failed because there is no record
    OBJECT = BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_MAX
    Similar message is displayed for Object: BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_DEF.
    Please let me know as to how to proceed on this.
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks for the reply!
    The objects are not available in the RSADMIN table.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I return my MacBook Air past the return date?

    Hi, I have a question that I've been googling but I haven't been able to find an answer to anywhere. Can I return a MacBook Air past the return date to an Apple store if it is still in shrink-wrap and I have a receipt? Thanks.

  • Layers is greyout in Adobe Acrobat Pro XI

    I just installed Adobe XI Pro, but the Layers features all greyout Please help ?

  • Solution to dead 20 gig black and white ipod

    my ipod was dead for over three days. i hadnt the slightest idea y it died but just today i fixed it. all i had to to was hold down the pause button and the center one to reset it. i thought that all i had to do was reset it before but i thought (and

  • Epson Printer stopped printing

    For some reason, my Imac 10.8.5 quit communicating with the Epson Artisan 835. I have two printers and rely on the older because it is less expensive to operate. I have tried reinstalling drivers, complete shutdowns, resetting the printers, everythin

  • End of Trial

    I've been using Elements 5.0 for some time, and downloaded the trial version of 6.0. My trial is nearing the end. I have not found any advantages in 6.0 compared to 5.0. I don't find that there's anything about 6.0 that induces me to buy the upgrade.