Update 10.6.4 Conflicts

My partner updated his iMac with today's update and now iTunes will not open and causes his computer to freeze entirely. After the first effort to open iTunes, we used the disk utility to repair permissions. After the 2nd attempt to open failed, we used his Time Machine backup to go back to before the update and tried iTunes again with no success.
Any ideas as to what could be causing the conflict. He does have an iPhone and already downloaded latest Safari 5.0?
Any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.
We have iMac's with 20 inch screen and was current with all updates.
Thanks.

The same thing happened to me, i just downloaded all the combo updates no luck (wasted a good 4GB). What i did i was downloaded iTunes and Safari again individually install them and it worked like a charm.
Hope this helps

Similar Messages

Auscompgeek: latest Firefox update has caused a conflict with Norton 360

Latest Firefox update has caused a conflict with Norton 360 "Web Safe" feature when using Yahoo search - no icons visible, i.e., green check mark for OK, gray for not enough info in Norton user data base, RED for unsafe
"Web Safe" feature functions in Firefox if Norton tool bar search is used (powered by ASK) - functions in IE8 when Yahoo search is used.
Problem is isolated to Firefox / Yahoo search.
No prior history of similar problem.
== Operating system ==
Windows 7

Result from https://www.mywot.com - WOT link is :
SERVER NOT FOUND

Mac Pro and Mac OS Update 10.5.2 Conflict!

I have re-installed Leopard three time already because of a conflict with my Mac Pro and apple's combined OS update for 10.5.2. After installing the update, my computer becomes unstable and eventually stops starting up properly, forcing me to partition and format the drive for a clean installation.
As a result, I am staying away from 10.5.2 and hope that future OS updates do not include such problems.
Just posting to warn others and see if anyone else had this problem. Take care!

I can't tell you have many times I've installed 10.5.2, except to say never had a problem but almost any type of conflict could occur with 3rd party hardware, software, AFP, routers or whatnot.
I would subscribe to checking news sites daily as they have collect reports, offer tips based on feedback, and see if any of it fits your situation (or "can of worms" I guess).
MacIntouch, MacFixit, Xlr8yourmac.com all have article.
Forums such as Mac OS X Leopard on Apple tend to have a number of threads, but the majority do seem to escape unscathed. So seems like every time you try, you do the same thing, get the same results. Adjust your game plan.

Online Update edirectory 888 patch conflicts

Saw yesterday that Novell released patches for eDirectory 8.8.8 for OES 11.2. On my Groupwise 2012 server, I am getting a conflict error when running Online Updates.
patch:oes11sp2-edirectory-888-patch2-hot-patch-9407.noarch conflicts with novell-NLDAPbase.x86_64 < 8.8.8.2-0.7.1 provided by novell-NLDAPbse-8.8.8.1-0.5.13.x86_64
It gives me 3 choices for Conflict Resolution. I can deinstall, replace, or not install the patch. I believe I would want to do replace, but I do not want to cripple my server either.
Please help guide me, Obi-Wan!

On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:27:58 +0000, Massimo Rosen wrote:
> On 12.07.2014 06:45, David Gersic wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 19:46:02 +0000, Bantha wrote:
>>
>>> Saw yesterday that Novell released patches for eDirectory 8.8.8 for
>>> OES 11.2. On my Groupwise 2012 server, I am getting a conflict error
>>> when running Online Updates.
>>>
>>> patch:oes11sp2-edirectory-888-patch2-hot-patch-9407.noarch conflicts
>>> with novell-NLDAPbase.x86_64 < 8.8.8.2-0.7.1 provided by
>>> novell-NLDAPbse-8.8.8.1-0.5.13.x86_64
>>>
>>> It gives me 3 choices for Conflict Resolution. I can deinstall,
>>> replace, or not install the patch. I believe I would want to do
>>> replace, but I do not want to cripple my server either.
>>
>> You might check with the GroupWise support forum. I suspect that this
>> is a conflict with what the ConsoleOne stuff installs, at least if I
>> remember correctly.
>
> No, it's not, at least not obviously. The Problematic C1 pieces of GW
> were 8.7.3.1 (e.g really old) and unrelated to LDAP, whereas here it
> seems to be something much more recent that fails.
Good point. That's the problem I was remembering, but yeah, this one does
look like a different package.
I'm asking backline support what should be done here. Hang on ...
David Gersic dgersic_@_niu.edu
Knowledge Partner http://forums.netiq.com
Please post questions in the forums. No support provided via email.
If you find this post helpful, please click on the star below.

[SOLVED] conflict update: 3 packages in conflict

hi all!
i'm trying to update my system but i get this:
ricerca di conflitti in corso...
:: gobject-introspection e gir-repository vanno in conflitto. Vuoi rimuovere gir-repository? [s/N] s
:: cairo e cairo-ubuntu vanno in conflitto. Vuoi rimuovere cairo-ubuntu? [s/N] s
:: freetype2 e freetype2-ubuntu vanno in conflitto. Vuoi rimuovere freetype2-ubuntu? [s/N] s
errore: impossibile eseguire l'operazione richiesta (impossibile soddisfare le dipendenze)
:: fontconfig-ubuntu: richiede freetype2-ubuntu>=2.3.11
:: libxft-ubuntu: richiede freetype2-ubuntu
the output is in italian, hope you can understand it.
help
Last edited by tracuboTL (2010-10-06 16:48:04)

I have run into this issue as well:
:: Starting full system upgrade...
:: Replace libdjvu with extra/djvulibre? [Y/n] y
:: Replace libv4l with extra/v4l-utils? [Y/n] y
:: Replace monaco_linux with community/monaco-linux-font? [Y/n] y
:: Replace wireshark with extra/wireshark-gtk? [Y/n] y
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
:: cairo and cairo-ubuntu are in conflict. Remove cairo-ubuntu? [y/N] y
:: freetype2 and freetype2-ubuntu are in conflict. Remove freetype2-ubuntu? [y/N] y
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: fontconfig-ubuntu: requires freetype2-ubuntu>=2.3.11
:: libxft-ubuntu: requires freetype2-ubuntu
I tried updating freetype2-ubuntu first (using yaourt) but am encountering a strange error:
error: 'freetype2-ubuntu': could not find or read package
It appears the freetype2-ubuntu package does not exist any longer? Originally I installed these to fix issues I was having with Firefox rendering fonts - following the guidelines here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Font_Configuration
Any help would be appreciated

Updates to stop browser conflicts

I have just completed a new redesign of a site LockSmart 24hr locksmith - everything was fine till firefox released a new version and now my text and some images do not align - i know this is a age old theme but is there no way to be able to install updates for DW to overide this problem - or am i doing something wrong???

If I hadn't seen David's warning, I would have jumped out of my seat and also woken the whole household when loading your page (it's nearly mid-night here). A warning should be given if there is auto start video on any site you link to :-)
I didn't see any problems viewing the entry page using Firefox 3.0.12. However, there are quite a few validation errors on the page that need to be corrected.
Viewing the Home Smart page, I did see in the opening paragraph, a line of text superimposed upon another line... again lots of validation errors that need correcting.
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.locksmart-uk.com%2Fhomesmart. html
A lot of these errors can be fixed immediately by changing the doctype to a less strict one. Easily done by:
File Menu>Convert>HTML 4.01 Transitional (or even the XHTML Transitional if you prefer).
Using a Strict doctype means that you have to work extra hard to ensure that you have no syntax errors and that the content is separated from the styling of the page (that is - no inline or deprecated styles alllowed).
Fix those issues and then check where the pages stand.

Unable to update glibc due to conflict

Hi everyone,
I have been trying to update my system for the last 4 days but all in vain.The reason is clear, its is /lib /usr/lib issue.I read most of the topics on the forum.But I don't seem to be getting anywhere.I am constantly either upgrading or downgrading packages.Really stuck in this process.I have a firmware directory and udev directory in /lib.
The output of the command:grep '^lib/' /var/lib/pacman/local/*/files | grep -v glibc
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1803.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1810.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1812.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1830.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1832.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1833.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1834.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1835.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1836.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1837.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1839.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-183a.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-183b.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-183e.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1841.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1870.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/r5u87x-hg-64-1/files:lib/firmware/r5u87x-05ca-1870_1.fw
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/console
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/core
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/fd
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/fuse
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/kmsg
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/net/
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/net/tunrl
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/null
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/ppp
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/pts/
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/shm/
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/stderr
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/stdin
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/stdout
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/devices/zero
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/rules.d/
/var/lib/pacman/local/udev-compat-175-1/files:lib/udev/rules.d/30-kernel-compat.
I would be very nice if I could get a hint on how to get rid of these directories.The firmware directory has a AUR package, a driver for webcam.I don't know what to do about udev.Before upgrading glibc I issued the "pacman -Sd " command with all the packages as arguments.As a result pacman stopped working because curl was updated.I downgraded curl package from the cache.Pacman is now running but Iam not able to update the glibc finally to end this process.
Thank you.

Is there a reason you can't remove the r5u87x-hg and udev-compat packages? I see the former is in the AUR but nothing about the latter. If that's all that's stopping you from upgrading, I'd suggest removing them, although I'm not sure what this udev-compat package is and whether it's important for some functionality specific to your setup.

Can't update archlinux anymore. (some conflicts or something.. )

Hello,
Today I typt pacman -Syu and guess what? He didn't do a thing after downloading all the packages
error: could not prepare transaction
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
nvidia-utils: /usr/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1 exists in filesystem
filesystem: /etc/profile exists in filesystem
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
[root@WernerPC werner]# pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1
error: No package owns /usr/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1
[root@WernerPC werner]# pacman -Qo /etc/profile
error: No package owns /etc/profile
[root@WernerPC werner]#
Never had this before, I need to delete those 2 files or what? I'm not sure so I just decided to ask here for some help. :-)

there are lots of threads with your problem.
the fix is to delete that file.
rm /usr/lib/libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1

Experimented: iPS with latest update "conflicts" with Intel Mac mini

Hello everyone.
Please see my earlier post first as "background story":
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=602573
So I have 2 1Gb iPod Shuffles, one mine, one my sister's. My sister's, the 1st time I plugged into her new Intel Mac mini, it asked for an iPod Update, I clicked "Yes" and proceeded with the update.
After that, I set the iPS with Disk Mode, it appears on the Desktop, when I launched or inside iTunes, once I hit the "Autofill" button, the shuffle unmount and disappear from the desktop immediately, leaving behind a 'warning message' with red exclamation mark, the same when you pull out a thumb drive or turn off an external drive, without unmounting them first.
My own shuffle, I did not apply the latest iPod Updater
When I bring the 2 iPS to my own iMac G5, both with same settings (Disk Mode etc) mounts perfectly on the Desktop, inside iTunes, I can 'Autofill' BOTH shuffles.
When I plug my non-updated shuffle into my sis's Intel Mac mini, it mounts nicely, and when hit with Autofill, it does so nicely without "self-unmounting" at all.
So in the end? I swap my shuffle with my sis, and make sure she never ever update the shuffle, at least for the time being.
So what does this show?? That the iPod shuffle with the latest update may have a conflict of instability with Intel-based Macs??
Thanks and cheers

Hi Howwow,
To add a detail: my updated Shuffle works like a charm on my old iBook and not on my new Intel MacBook. So I am convinced it is in the Shuffle/Intel combination. I did try undoing the update on the shuffle (reverting back to 2005-11-17), but that made no difference on my Intel MacBook.
Regards

ORA-01403 No Data Found error on Update

I am having difficulty troubleshooting a form (6i) where the data can not be updated. This form was recently modified by another developer (who is no longer w/ us) and we removed a unique key from the items list in the data block, however the particular field is still contained in the table. There are no constraints on any fields in this table.
I have a button pallette in the form and when I try to update and save, I get the "No Data Found" error message. However, I know there is data in the record but I can not figure out why the error.
When I display the error, the sql code looks something like this:
UPDATE db.temp
SET P_ID=:1,S_ID=:2
WHERE ROWID=:3
I put a message in the do_key('list_values') trigger to show me the rowid but nothing comes up. I wonder if this has something to do with that and if so, why and how do I fix it?
Appreciate any direction any of you can provide in coming to a solution on this. Thank you.

I don't explicitly say ROWID=:3, what I mean, I
didn't code the update query. My understanding is
that it is done behind the scenes given the items in
the data block. Ok, I couldn't tell from the post whether it was explicit or not. This is from
Oracle FAQ:
"I get 'NO DATA FOUND' errors. How does one handle this?
An ORA-1403 (No Data Found) error is signalled within a replicated environment when there is a conflict in data. Here is an illustration of what happens in most scenarios featuring this error:
Let's say we need to update a table and set column x=1 where x=9. When the first change occurs on the source database, Oracle checks to ensure that x=9. Once this transaction commits, it is queued for execution on the destination site(s). When the transaction is applied to the destinations, Oracle first check to verify that x=9 (the old value); if it does, then Oracle applies the update (update table set x = 1 where x = 9); if it does not, an entry to the DEFERROR table is logged indicating ORA-1403.
If the application is updating primary key values, one can also expect plenty "NO DATA FOUND" errors. Primary keys should NEVER be updated. If one updates primary key values, conflict resolution also becomes extremely difficult. "
Check your pll file and anywhere else you are using db.temp. Then check the the update using PLSQL.

Patch conflict when applying the 10.2.0.5 Patch set on Windows 7.

Hi everybody.
I have problem when install PSR 10.2.0.5 on Windows 7.
First, Oracle Client 10.2.0.3 installed successfull. I want upgrade from Oracle Client 10.2.0.3 to Oracle Client 10.2.0.5.
I downloaded Database10g PatchSetRelease10.2.0.5 for Microsoft Windows(x32) from E-Delivery Japan Site, then used it installed successfull but new ODBC is not added.
Because of that I used metalink for download 10.2.0.5 Patch 9 and OPatch utility release 10.2.0.5.0.
I extracted OPatch utility release 10.2.0.5.0 zip file directly under the ORACLE_HOME (Old Opatch is been overrided).
Then Opatch aplly command executed for 10.2.0.5 Patch 9 but the error has occurred.
( D:\Oracle10.2.0.5\12332703 is 10.2.0.5 Patch 9 folder path. )
Error Description:
==============
Fatal:OPatch invoked as follows: 'apply D:\Oracle10.2.0.5\12332703 '
information:
OracleHOME : D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3
From : C:\Program Files\Oracle\Inventory
Center Inventory: n/a
OPatch Version : 10.2.0.5.1
OUI Version : 10.2.0.3.0
OUI Location : D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\oui
Log・File Location : D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch2011-05-12_11-04-31am.log
Information:Patch history file: D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\cfgtoollogs\opatch\opatch_history.txt
Information:Starting ApplySession at Thu May 12 11:04:32 JST 2011
Information:Starting Apply Session at Thu May 12 11:04:32 JST 2011
Information:PatchObject::PatchObject() Patch location is D:\Oracle10.2.0.5\12332703
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() Patch location is D:\Oracle10.2.0.5\12332703
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() patch location is D:\Oracle10.2.0.5\12332703
Information:ApplySession is temporary patch '12332703' being applied to
OH 'D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3'
Information:Starting to apply patch to local system at Thu May 12 11:04:32 JST 2011
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() Patch location is D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\inventory\oneoffs\5923165
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() patch location is D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\inventory\oneoffs\5923165
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() Patch location is D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\inventory\oneoffs\5923165
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() patch location is D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\inventory\oneoffs\5923165
Information:Patch 12332703 has Generic Conflict with 5923165
Information:Patch 12332703 has no conflicts/superset wiht any other patch processed till now
Information:Checking conflicts for patch: 12332703
Information:Checking conflicts/supersets for patch: 12332703 with patch:12332703
Information:Checking conflicts/supersets for patch: 12332703 with patch:5923165
Information:Patch 12332703 has Genric Conflict with 5923165. Conflicting files are :
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\bin\orajox10.dll
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\lib\orajox10.lib
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\bin\orageneric10.dll
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\rdbms\admin\orageneric10.sym
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\bin\oraclient10.dll
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\rdbms\admin\oraclient10.sym
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\bin\orapls10.dll
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\rdbms\admin\orapls10.sym
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\bin\oranl10.dll
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\bin\oran10.dll
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\bin\sqora32.dll
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\bin\oraxml10.dll
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\lib\oraxml10.lib
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\lib\orapls10.lib
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\bin\oracore10.dll
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\lib\oracore10.lib
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\rdbms\admin\oracore10.sym
Warning:OUI-67619:Interim patch 12332703 conflict with patch(es) [ 5923165 ] in the Oracle Home
Information:
Patch [ 12332703 ] conflict with patch(es) [ 5923165 ] in the Oracle Home.
To resolve patch conflicts please contact Oracle Support Services.
If you continue, patch(es) [ 5923165 ] will be rolled back and the new Patch [ 12332703 ] will be installed.
Continue?y
Information:Start to wait for user-input at Thu May 12 11:04:36 JST 2011
Information:Finish waiting for user-input at Thu May 12 11:04:44 JST 2011
Information:User Responded with: Y
Information:Start the Apply initScript at Thu May 12 11:04:44 JST 2011
Information:Finish the Apply initScript at Thu May 12 11:04:44 JST 2011
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() Patch location is D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\inventory\oneoffs\5923165
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() patch location is D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\inventory\oneoffs\5923165
Information:Start the Rollback init script for Patch "5923165" at Thu May 12 11:04:44 JST 2011
Information:Finish the Rollback init script for Patch "5923165" at Thu May 12 11:04:44 JST 2011
Information:
Running prerequisite checks...
Information:Space Needed : 444755772
Information:Prereq checkPatchApplicableOnCurrentPlatform Passed for patch : 12332703
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() Patch location is D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\inventory\oneoffs\5923165
Information:PatchObject::createPatchObject() patch location is D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_3\inventory\oneoffs\5923165
Information:Patch 12332703: Optional component(s) missing : [ oracle.rdbms, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.rdbms.dbscripts, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.network.rsf, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.has.common, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.has.rsf, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.rdbms.dbscripts, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.odbc.ic, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.ntoledb, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.ons, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.xdk.rsf, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.rdbms.dv.oc4j, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.sysman.bsln, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.dbjava.ic, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.has.crs, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.has.db, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.rdbms.dv, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.rdbms.plsql, 10.2.0.5.0 ] , [ oracle.oracore.rsf, 10.2.0.5.0 ]
Information:Prereq checkComponents failed. So, checkApplicable returning without execution.
Information:Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
The details are:
Patch 12332703: Required component(s) missing : [ oracle.rdbms.rsf, 10.2.0.5.0 ]
Fatal:OUI-67074:ApplySession failed while checking the precondition. : Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
Information:Because the system has not damaged, OPatch doesn't try restoring of the system.
Information:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information:The following warnings have occurred during OPatch execution:
Information:1) OUI-67619:Interim patch 12332703 conflict with patch(es) [ 5923165 ] in the Oracle Home
Information:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information:Finishing ApplySession at Thu May 12 11:04:45 JST 2011
Information:Total time spent waiting for user-input is 8 seconds. Finish at Thu May 12 11:04:45 JST 2011
Information:Stack description : oracle.opatch.PrereqFailedException: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
Information:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatchSessionHelper.runApplyPrereqs(OPatchSessionHelper.java:4451)
Information:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.ApplySession.processLocal(ApplySession.java:3695)
Information:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.ApplySession.process(ApplySession.java:5577)
Information:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatchSession.main(OPatchSession.java:1719)
Information:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatch.main(OPatch.java:630)
==============
Please help to solve this problem.
Thanks & Best regards.

Hi;
Please see below notes which could be helpful for your issue:
How to find whether the one-off Patches will conflict or not? [ID 458485.1]
Patch Set Updates - One-off Patch Conflict Resolution [ID 1061295.1]
Using OPatch -report option, how to check for potential conflicts during patch apply without Database / Listener shutdown [ID 406037.1]
If its not help than i suggest move your issue to Forum Home » Database » Database - General
Regard
Helios

[SOLVED] baloo-frameworks and baloo4 are in conflict

Hi together,
i just wanted to do an update after quite a long time (few months) but i cannot do the update because of the conflict of baloo-frameworks and baloo4 (translated from german):
# pacman -Syu
:: Synchronize package database...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
multilib is up to date
:: Start update...
:: attica by extra/attica-qt4? [J/n]
:: ca-certificates-java by core/ca-certificates-utils? [J/n]
:: dirmngr by core/gnupg? [J/n]
:: intel-dri by extra/mesa? [J/n]
:: java-common by extra/java-runtime-common? [J/n]
:: kdebase-katepart by extra/katepart4? [J/n]
:: kdebase-konsole by extra/konsole? [J/n]
:: kdebase-kwrite by extra/kwrite? [J/n]
:: kdeedu-kalgebra by extra/kalgebra? [J/n]
:: kdeedu-kanagram by extra/kanagram? [J/n]
:: kdeedu-khangman by extra/khangman? [J/n]
:: kdeedu-kig by extra/kig? [J/n]
:: kdeedu-parley by extra/parley? [J/n]
:: kdegraphics-gwenview by extra/gwenview? [J/n]
:: kdesdk-kapptemplate by extra/kapptemplate? [J/n]
:: kdesdk-kate by extra/kate? [J/n]
:: kdesdk-okteta by extra/okteta? [J/n]
:: lib32-intel-dri by multilib/lib32-mesa? [J/n]
:: libaccounts-qt by extra/libaccounts-qt4? [J/n]
:: libltdl by core/libtool? [J/n]
:: lirc-utils by extra/lirc? [J/n]
:: qtkeychain by community/qtkeychain-qt4? [J/n]
:: signon by extra/signon-qt4? [J/n]
:: telepathy-qt by extra/telepathy-qt4? [J/n]
Check dependencies...
:: There are 4 providers for libgl:
:: Repositorium extra
1) mesa-libgl 2) nvidia-304xx-libgl 3) nvidia-340xx-libgl 4) nvidia-libgl
Select (Default=1): 4
:: There are 4 providers for lib32-libgl:
:: Repositorium multilib
1) lib32-mesa-libgl 2) lib32-nvidia-304xx-libgl 3) lib32-nvidia-340xx-libgl 4) lib32-nvidia-libgl
Select (Default=1): 4
Warning: Detected dependency cycle:
Warning: xorg-server will be installed before nvidia-libgl
Warning: Detected dependency cycle:
Warning: harfbuzz will be installed freetype2
Warning: Detected dependency cycle:
Warning: lib32-harfbuzz will be installed lib32-freetype2
Searching for conflicts...
Error: Not solveable conflict
:: baloo-frameworks and baloo4 remain in conflict
I tried already to search for an solution but i couldn't find any for that case.
Thanks for your help.
Best regards
Werzi
Last edited by Werzi2001 (2015-01-30 23:45:51)

I think Werzi2001 needs to read this news :
https://www.archlinux.org/news/transiti … -and-qt-5/
he probably doesn't know the news about the decision to mix KF5 applications and KDE4
if you want to use the KF5 version of these applications ( kate, baloo etc... ) simply answer "Yes" to all questions
check this thread for more information :
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=192657
Last edited by Potomac (2015-01-30 19:41:37)

CS3 Install Updates "Interpret Footage" Problem

Once I install the CS3 3.2.0 update all my previously imported graphics change their interpritation to HD Animorphic 1080 (1.333).
So when I open existing projects I have to hunt and peck to re interpret all the imported graphics back to square pixels. Any ideas?
Thanks so much - David Joslin

Thank for the reply. I can do that for some projects. But some have so many different Interpolations that it makes that time prohibitive. So I thought I would search for an more permanent answer. But if you have never heard of this problem with that update it sounds like the update may be in conflict with a local setting on my computer. I thought that maybe there was a preference I was missing that set the interpret setting application wide.
Was the 3.2.0 update generally received without issues such as this?
Thanks - David
>>> robodog2 <[email protected]> 8/10/2010 1:27 PM >>>
Hmmm, to be honest I haven't tried this but if you open your project and select everything in your project panel and then Interpret footage...does that work ? Maybe test on a small project to see if it works OK....?

Trying to set up Directv GenieGO using Airport Extreme. Getting error message: DHCP range entered conflicts with the WAN IP Address of your base station. How do I resolve the conflict.

Trying to configure an Airport Extreme manually. After I enter the IP Address of the GenieGo along with the rest of information required I am getting the following error message when I click update:
DHCP range entered conflicts with the WAN IP address of your base station.
How do I resolve the conflict?

You cannot use the same range on LAN and WAN if you are routing.. it must be different.. and you should not be routing at all.
The AE should be in bridge mode. NO DHCP settings at all.

PSU update patch link

Hi,
While applying psu 11.1.0.7.2 on 11.1.0.7.1 i got this,
Following patches have conflicts. Please contact Oracle Support and get the merged patch of the patches :
8199107, 8833297, 7639602, 7111245, 7295298, 6972189
Do i raise SR requesting these patches. Or is there any direct link to get the merged patch of these.
Thanks,
Taher

Hi Taher
I just discovered another Metalink note which indicates that some patch conflicts can be ignored;
"Patch Set Updates - One-off Patch Conflict Resolution [ID 1061295.1]"
If this all gets too confusing then the best is to log an SR with a list of conflicts and let Oracle advise you further.
Regarding your new questions.
Q1). How can i confirm, i have 11.1.0.7.1. if i check the opatch lsinventory for 11.1.0.7.1 patch, it is showing in the list.
A1) It seems like this is a known problem. There is a discussion of this problem here;
http://jhdba.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/identifying-applied-psu-patches/#more-520
Apparently you can use this command (but not with 100% success);
SELECT * FROM registry$history;
You can also have a look at this note "How to confirm that a Critical Patch Update (CPU) has been installed in Linux / UNIX [ID 821263.1]".
This note says "To implement the CPU installation into each database associated to the ORACLE_HOME, the Post Installation steps must be executed as documented in the CPU README". So extra steps are required during the application of the CPU to update the registry$history.
Q2). In the document
Preparation Guidelines for an E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 Upgrade [ID 761570.1]
Path E -> Section B, i have applied all the patches upto 8199107. All the patches afer this are for 11.1.0.7.0
But as i am in 11.1.0.7.1, can i still apply the remaining patches which are
8639653
8940108
9026927
9066130
9554727
9743057
A2). To be honest I am not sure what the answer to this question is. Maybe one of the other experts can answer this question.
Does opatch indicate if these patches are currently missing?
I would check with Oracle about this.
Regards
Frank

Update 10.6.4 Conflicts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for