Update deployment shows downloading 0% in Software center.

Hi All,
I am trying to patch a windows server 2012 R2 server using SCCM 2012 R2. The update is deployed to the collection & received in the machine but the file download always shows 0% in software center.
Please help.
Thanks,
Pranay.

Thanks Jacob,
found the solution at your one of other post :-
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7c7f8538-c2e2-4ecc-ad05-dca13d00559e/error-sending-dav-request-http-code-500-status-internal-server-error?forum=configmanagergeneral
http://venusingireddy.blogspot.in/2013/07/error-sending-dav-request-http-code-500.html
I was having the same problem.
Thanks,
Pranay.

Similar Messages

Software Updates Deployment Shows "Unknown" Computers, Previously Had Compliant

I'm not sure what is going on, but can anyone tell me why a software updates deployment would all of a sudden show all computers as having an "Unknown" status? Previously, most computers were "Compliant" and there were a couple
with errors. When I went to check it (about a week after the original deployment), I found it had reset all to "Unknown" status. This was yesterday, and now today there are a couple computers showing "Compliant" but most are
still "Unknown". It is not set up with ADR, so it's not (at least I don't think) looking for newer updates. Any ideas?

A re-evaluation of the software update deployment, which you configure in the client settings, can cause this behavior. That's why you should always use the reports for compliance checks and not the deployments node.
My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

Clients cant download application from software center [ error : 0x87d00607 ]

I've got a small SCCM 2012 deployment with about 3 clients , these three clients cant download application available on software center!
i checked out my boundries and boundries group and they are well configured .
help plz

i have just a subnet configuration in my boundary so there's no association against the site in AD
Houda
Subnet or IP ranges? Best to configure with IP ranges.
http://blog.configmgrftw.com/ip-subnet-boundaries-still-evil/
Cheers Paul | http://sccmentor.wordpress.com

Error during setup of software update deploy or download.

Hi,
We periodically get an error on a single patch download when finishing up the deploy of a software update as shown in the screen shot.
Does this mean the download is ok except for the one patch or is the entire deploy broke?
Thanks Lance

You need to ensure your proxy settings "as the computer" account is to open a command prompt (as admin), and run "psexec -i -s -d cmd" which will open a new command prompt "as the computer" then launch Internet explorer from wherever it resides in c:\program
files\etc... and try to open that web page from Microsoft that it's having trouble with. i.e.
http://wsus.ds.downl...oft.com----.exe and see if you can open the file. that will rule out any proxy issues
Also For this issue, You can refer answer of Jörgen Nilsson in below link
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/6eb3d968-cadc-4aa8-9352-d75d10a72162/automatic-deployment-rule-not-downloading-the-updates?forum=configmanagergeneral
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

Software Center Application Uninstallation Button Greyed Out and Deploying an Application with Uninstall switch Fails

Hi,
I tried everything I could find on the internet but no luck so far. I can successfully deploy MS Visio 2013 to the clients. I also want to be able to uninstall it from the clients. On the client machine Uninstall button is greyed out. This deployment is
installed as "Available" and there is only one deployment type within that MS Visio 2013 Application.
I tried the following uninstall commands in my deployment:
setup.exe /uninstall
setup.exe /uninstall
VisPro
/config .\vispro.ww\uninstallvisio.xml
“\\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\setup.exe” /uninstall VisPro /config "\\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\vispro.ww\uninstallvisio.xml"
\\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\setup.exe /uninstall VisPro /config \\SRVSCCM2012\Sources\MSApplications\MSVisioPro_2013_64Bit_ENG\vispro.ww\uninstallvisio.xml
I checked Product ID from Setup.xml and I know it is correct. My uninstallvisio.xml' content is below:
<Configuration Product="VisPro">
<Display Level="basic" CompletionNotice="yes" SuppressModal="yes" AcceptEula="yes" />
<Setting Id="SETUP_REBOOT" Value="Never" />
</Configuration>
Last night, I downloaded and installed Cumulative Update 1 for SCCM 2012 R2 and I haven't tried the deployment after the update,yet. I will try it today but please let me know what else to check.
Yavuz Selim Atmaca

After I updated SCCM Server and test client pc with CU1 , I tried to deploy visio as Required. It installed successfully. Then I uninstalled visio by deploying the application with Uninstall Action.
After that I tried to deploy visio as "Available" to see if Software Center Uninstall button works. However visio deployment does not come to Software Center's Available Applications List. I check the status of the deployment under the Deployments monitoring
node and it says Success "Already Compliant". I dont know what it means. Does config manager thinks that visio already installed?
Yavuz Selim Atmaca
2 or 3 hours later that -Succes "Already Compliant"- status of the deployment under the Deployments monitoring node is vanished automatically and Software Center application list showed the new deployment. I installed it and uninstalled it succesfully.
So, you are right Solution is the CU1 but I am still wondering why my available deployment took so time to be visible in Software Center althought I didn't enter any schedule to be available.
Yavuz Selim Atmaca

Available Package Deployments not showing in Software Center of Domain Controller Clients

We have a SCCM 2012 R2 environment and have a pretty weird issue. I have deployed multiple 'available' software packages to a collection. The non-domain controller client receives the deployments and I can run them successfully, however the domain controller
shows nothing in the software center. But in the PolicyAgent.log of the domain controller I can see it getting the policy:
Raising event:
instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyDownloadSucceeded
ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
DateTime = "20141002163132.946000+000";
DownloadMethod = "BITS";
DownloadSource = "https://XXXXXXXX.XXX.local/SMS_MP/.sms_pol?HHS20013-HHS0002D-XXXXXXXXX";
PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
PolicyPath = "CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID=\"XXX20013-XXX0002D-8C28365A\",PolicySource=\"SMS:XXX\",PolicyVersion=\"1.00\"";
ProcessID = 1484;
ThreadID = 4632;
PolicyAgent_PolicyDownload
10/2/2014 12:31:32 PM 4632 (0x1218)
What can I check?

I am seeing the following in the PolicyEvaluator.log:
Updating policy CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID="HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A",PolicySource="SMS:HHS",PolicyVersion="1.00"
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:42:40 AM
7092 (0x1BB4)
Applying policy HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
10/3/2014 11:42:40 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
Raising event:
instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyRuleRevoked
ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
DateTime = "20141003154242.730000+000";
PolicyID = "HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A";
PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
PolicySource = "SMS:HHS";
PolicyVersion = "1.00";
ProcessID = 5324;
RuleCondition = "{6A383AEC-DA01-44CC-88AC-EE7CBBC9CA6F}";
RuleID = "{59aae67e-4ae4-476a-8aa9-1e0fef74275d}";
ThreadID = 7092;
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
10/3/2014 11:42:42 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
Raising event:
instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyRuleRevoked
ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
DateTime = "20141003154244.075000+000";
PolicyID = "HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A";
PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
PolicySource = "SMS:HHS";
PolicyVersion = "1.00";
ProcessID = 5324;
RuleCondition = "{73EEC40F-921F-400C-8DAD-9985B6FF9EA0}";
RuleID = "{a82507ac-d123-4e58-b7e8-e7e3e1c14ef9}";
ThreadID = 7092;
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
10/3/2014 11:42:44 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
Raising event:
instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyRuleApplied
ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
DateTime = "20141003154245.460000+000";
PolicyID = "HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A";
PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
PolicySource = "SMS:HHS";
PolicyVersion = "1.00";
ProcessID = 5324;
RuleCondition = "{735BB0FE-157C-4969-B253-413FB85A928C}";
RuleID = "{4d354de9-ad9c-4588-b772-7d48405934f2}";
ThreadID = 7092;
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
Applied policy CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID="HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A",PolicySource="SMS:HHS",PolicyVersion="1.00"
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM
7092 (0x1BB4)
Raising event:
instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluationComplete
ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
DateTime = "20141003154245.470000+000";
PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\ROOT\\ccm\\policy\\Machine\\RequestedConfig";
PolicyPath = "CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID=\"HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A\",PolicySource=\"SMS:HHS\",PolicyVersion=\"1.00\"";
ProcessID = 5324;
ThreadID = 7092;
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM 7092 (0x1BB4)
Policy state for [CCM_Policy_Policy5.PolicyID="HHS20018-HHS0002D-8C28365A",PolicyVersion="1.00",PolicySource="SMS:HHS"] is currently [Active]
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM
1820 (0x071C)
Updating settings in \\.\root\ccm\policy\machine\actualconfig
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:42:45 AM
1820 (0x071C)
Raising event:
instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_SettingsEvaluationComplete
ClientID = "GUID:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX";
DateTime = "20141003154302.533000+000";
PolicyNamespace = "\\\\.\\root\\ccm\\policy\\machine\\actualconfig";
ProcessID = 5324;
ThreadID = 1820;
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator
10/3/2014 11:43:02 AM 1820 (0x071C)
Policies are downloaded and evaluated for the reply of correlation guid {9985950D-3E04-40E5-81FD-8E2BCBE0DB25}
PolicyAgent_PolicyEvaluator 10/3/2014 11:43:02 AM
1820 (0x071C)

Applications Stuck at 0% Downloading in Software Center

I'm currently utilizing a SCCM 2012 R2 environment with roughly 100 Distribution Points. The problem I'm running into is that random Applications will get stuck at 0% downloading at a location for all client PCs. This same application will have
no problem at a different location using a different DP. The only remediation I could find was to redistribute the application to the specific DP. Once this is done, the application downloads and installs without a problem.
What is frustrating is the fact that this appears to be happening to random applications. It's never for an application in which all distribution points need to redistribute, it's always one single DP. It also appears to be happening for random
DPs, it hasn't been the same DP ever.
Any suggestions would be extremely helpful, and I could provide additional information if need be.

Hi,
I found several similar threads in this forum. And many reasons are causing the same symptom. Such as IIS permission on specific folder, device moving from a collection to
another.
Software
Center stuck on Downloading (0% complete) when trying to install an application
SCCM
2012 R2 Stuck at "Downloading (0% Complete)
Programmatically
Deployed TaskSequence getting Stuck in Software Center at Downloading(0%) of Resource.
In addition, logs are always helpful to the troubleshooting.
distmgr.log
Records details about package creation, compression, delta replication, and information updates.
execmgr.log
Records details about packages and task sequences that run on the client.

Applications Installed through task sequence not showing up in Software Center

In the task sequence we use for our OSD Windows 7 machine build, we have Custom-Install Application steps which install a number of of our Applications. Each of these Applications has the "Allow this application to be installed from the Install
Application task sequence action without being deployed" checkbox checked. All of the Applications have the following properties set:
Installation behavior: Install for system
Logon requirement: Whether or not a user is logged in
Installation program visibility: Hidden
When a machine is built using this task sequence, all of the Applications install successfully - they show up in Control Panel\Programs and Features, and they run correctly. However, none of them show up in the Software Center. I'm not seeing anything in
any of the logs that indicates a problem, and the Software Center remains empty even after running all the client evaluation cycle actions
Interestingly, if I add a couple of the newly build machines to a collection, then target deployments for the already installed Applications to that collection, after running the Machine Policy Retrieval and Evaluation Cycle the Applications immediately
show up in Software Center as installed.
Does anyone know if Applications installed through a task sequence do not show up in the Software Center by default, or could you give me some troubleshooting tips if this is not normal?
Thanks for any suggestions!
SCCM 2012 SP1, Single site, W7 clients

Why you deploy applications through task sequences? Task sequences are built and meant to be used with OSD, not application deployment.
To my knowledge, if you have application install step in a task sequence and you deploy that task sequence to a collection of machines, the software center on those machines only sees the task sequence itself, not the applications inside the task sequence.
If you want your applications to be shown in the software center, change the method of deploying stuff and deploy applications as they're are meant to.

Software center dont show the package(not applications) on the client as installed when logging in with other User ID.

It is showing as Installed in software center with user ID through which it is actually installed but not from other User ID's.
Please send me suggestions or how we can resolve this issue.

Software center might not show it if there are multiple users logged in. It will only be shown to the
user that got the highest (lowest? Can't remember it) session id.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a3c20fe1-226d-4667-afeb-74879ee93c6a/applications-but-not-programs-showing-in-software-centre?forum=configmanagerapps
Regards, Ibrahim Hamdy

Software Updates Deployment Evaluation.

Hi,
I would like to get some clarification around the Software Updates Deployment Eval. cycle. (SCCM R2 CU3)
Example scenario:
I have a Software Update Group that contains 200 updates. This SUG includes updates that are prerequisites for other updates in the same SUG. So, when scanning occurs. Only one of these updates are at that particular time considered applicable.
The software update deployment deadline is reached. The update is installed, as expected. The then agent reports compliance against the update deployment.
Then comes the Software Update Scan schedule, when a new scan is made against the SUP more updates are now detected as required because of the previously installed update - from the same SUG which are deployed.
This leaves me in a situation where the agent is compliant against the Software Update deployment and non-compliant in regards to the actual Software Update Group.
I can of course just hit the schedule for Software Update Deployment Evaluation manually on the agent or simply do something (adding an update or whatever) that modifies the actual software updates deployment policy. This would in turn cause a new evaluation
to occur at the client.
Bottom line. Is my conclusion correct or have i missed something here?
If i'm correct, a good thing would be to add scheduling options available for the actual "software update deployment evaluation".
That would really come in handy in situations like above scenario.
Br,
Chris

The next scheduled scan cycle will pick up the newly applicable but non-compliant updates in the deployment.
However, note that update compliance at the client level is done against the entire update catalog as this is actually done by the Windows Update Agent (WUA) which knows nothing about ConfigMgr. Thus, the fact that an update is in a deployment or not is
completely irrelevant as far as compliance and compliance reporting goes (which is part of the reason why compliance reporting in ConfigMgr is tricky).
Updating the policy of an update deployment will kick off a scan cycle (just like creating a new deployment will) on the clients which is why you are probably seeing this behavior as addressing the scenario.
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys
Thanks Jason,
What you are describing exactly matches the point I’m trying to make here. There is no correlation what so ever between update scans and actual software update deployments. The logic just isn't there. Which is a logic that is lacking
– in my opinion.
I really do think there is room for improvement here.
Case:
A customer wants to minimize the spread of reboots (a maint. window overnight should be sufficient for the agent to get the server fully up to date). The admin – who also wants to minimize effort in regards to worrying about MS bundling\prereq
requirements – simply wants it all to be taken care of by the updates deployment agent.
Example:
Software update deployment contains required updates as well as updates that will not be detected as required - until the deployment has been run – and a new update scan cycle has taken place.
The server reboots and updates deployment agent says all is fine – with regards to the deployment in it's current state, of course.
But it's not.
The server then issues a new scan (maybe 4 hours later and way behind the end of the maint. window) according to the software updates scan schedule, and suddenly 10 more updates are applicable, but still within the same deployment.
What happens? Nothing, sadly. Next maint. window? Nothing.
Not even a (client agent set – and scheduled) software update deployment re-eval takes care of this since – according to my findings – the deployment will never really be evaluated against again without administrative intervention.
Suggestion:
Whenever a software update deployment has been run, succeeded and passed the "after reboot" detectjob. Initiate a new evaluation of this deployment in full – of course including a pre-eval software updates scan. Just add
a few steps to the logic of updates deployment.
Evaluate.
Apply.
Initiate a new scan.
Re-Evaluate.
Apply again (if needed)
Reboot
Initiate a new scan.
Re-evaluate
Isn’t this the way WAUA has always worked? Why shouldn’t this method be adopted here as well? Why should ConfigMgr not honour the procedure?
Result:
Administrative relieve. Since I know that a software update deployment will always do the job, in full. No need for manual triggers or policy modifications.
Caveats:
I do realize the fact that – if this would be the scenario - the admin sometimes will not be aware of what might happen during the nightly maint. window since he cannot solely rely on compliance data.
Anyways:
This should at least be a deployment option in future releases.
"Force rescan and deployment re-evaluation after first run." Simple.
Would make life easier and keep the spread of reboots concentrated to one night and to a minimum. (Given the appropriate length of maint. windows of course)
Consider things like KB2919355 and how WUAU agent handles that against Windows Update.
Br,
Chris

Applications not visible in Software Center

Hello Guys,
some Clients have Problems to show Application Deployments in Software Center. In Deployment Monitoring Tool I can see the Deployments. But if you select the Deployment I get the Error "DT cannot be empty". So I think the
Policy isn't downloaded correctly.
CIDownloader.log.
CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of DocumentType 2 for ModelName Windows/x64_Windows_Server_2008_R2_Core, Version 1 CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of DocumentType 1 for ModelName Windows/x86_Embedded_Windows_7, Version 2 CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of DocumentType 2 for ModelName Windows/x86_Embedded_Windows_7, Version 2 CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
CCIDownloadItem::AddToManifest - Starting download of CI content document with DocumentName urn:policy-platform:policy.microsoft.com:smlif:ms.dcm.Windows.x86_Windows_7_Client:1:VL, DocumentVersion 1 (VL) CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 5068 (0x13CC)
CCIDownloader::ParseDtsMessage - Dts failed with error code: 0x80070002. CI Downloader will retry. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
CIDownloaderJob({CFEBCEF0-7D16-421D-A53A-2A26F82CE5BF}): Received Dts failure message during CI download. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
CIDownloaderJob({CFEBCEF0-7D16-421D-A53A-2A26F82CE5BF}): CCIDownloaderJob::QueueRetry - Consumed 5763 seconds of 172800 second download window. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
CIDownloaderJob({CFEBCEF0-7D16-421D-A53A-2A26F82CE5BF}): CCIDownloaderJob::QueueRetry - Retrying package download in 2880 seconds... CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:00:54 4008 (0x0FA8)
CCIDownloader::CreateJob CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CCIDownloader::StartJob CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIDownloader job empty. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CCIDownloader::DeleteJob for job {D10C1E70-D480-4C05-9C95-D4BCBECFD4F1} CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIDownloader job deleted. CIDownloader 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgent.log
CAgent::EvaluateCIs CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=Init) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): Client requesting CIAgentJob context info for key: StateMessagePriority CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): TransitionState(From=Init, To=WaitingForAssignedCI) for Event=Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=WaitingForAssignedCI) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore DownloadCIs CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=DownloadCIs, CurrentState=WaitingForAssignedCI) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): TransitionState(From=WaitingForAssignedCI, To=DownloadingCIs) for Event=Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=DownloadingCIs) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): Client requesting CIAgentJob context info for key: PostRebootDetect CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): Nothing to be downloaded. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::QueueEvent - Queueing event and incrementing semaphore PersistCIs CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): QueueDebug - Executing Event. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=PersistCIs, CurrentState=DownloadingCIs) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): TransitionState(From=DownloadingCIs, To=PersistingCIModels) for Event=Transition CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::Execute [GlobalSemaphore] Trying to aquire global semaphore CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::Execute [GlobalSemaphore] Queued for global semaphore acquisition. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 1336 (0x0538)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): GlobalJobEvent() called [GlobalSemaphore] CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::Execute [GlobalSemaphore] Acquired global semaphore. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): CAgentJob::HandleEvent(Event=Transition, CurrentState=PersistingCIModels) CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_0ddc3eb7-5ee3-41eb-9fed-646d28a06bcf:11. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_0ddc3eb7-5ee3-41eb-9fed-646d28a06bcf:11 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_0e9a8348-0ad5-44ee-bf81-82dfd44f0699:11. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_0e9a8348-0ad5-44ee-bf81-82dfd44f0699:11 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_10203df1-4fe4-49ef-8ab3-e8030e6a2cef:22. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_10203df1-4fe4-49ef-8ab3-e8030e6a2cef:22 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_1fc34d72-440d-4f6f-9a50-604e421f3c04:13. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_1fc34d72-440d-4f6f-9a50-604e421f3c04:13 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_2191a582-1987-40fd-b8ec-cbee1a2ba590:4, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_22778347-5967-4ee1-bdc0-3fce578b7ee1:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_22778347-5967-4ee1-bdc0-3fce578b7ee1:2 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_278d8ebe-16bc-49b7-a806-42025d921f84:6. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_278d8ebe-16bc-49b7-a806-42025d921f84:6 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_27c341d0-a38e-43c9-aeef-a82be7e1f664:1. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_27c341d0-a38e-43c9-aeef-a82be7e1f664:1 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_2bf3a7d7-27fc-4fe6-80ff-80c9adee89a8:5, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_33aa078b-9afa-48b3-9550-8d926c07721e:5. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_33aa078b-9afa-48b3-9550-8d926c07721e:5 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_3a41042c-4feb-421b-8b55-42334654681e:15, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_3be6a762-f993-4fe5-aca5-1989551d5a88:5. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_3be6a762-f993-4fe5-aca5-1989551d5a88:5 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_3c0b214a-2258-4765-be5d-d2a9fd754bc6:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_3c0b214a-2258-4765-be5d-d2a9fd754bc6:2 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_46f5d091-992c-4e24-b0a2-3de657c0b8c7:16, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_49337598-4c68-401e-8c39-a415288cd7d6:11. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_49337598-4c68-401e-8c39-a415288cd7d6:11 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_4da67baa-ac51-4327-bfdc-c8f81781ae62:20, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_4f0df4d7-e1d0-4717-b9e2-5f9cb6f1dd9b:8. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_4f0df4d7-e1d0-4717-b9e2-5f9cb6f1dd9b:8 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_5d895d54-10ea-447d-8b45-123b77e89721:4. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_5d895d54-10ea-447d-8b45-123b77e89721:4 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_636ad5b2-da09-439b-ac7c-d7895d728131:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_636ad5b2-da09-439b-ac7c-d7895d728131:2 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_665c56e0-626a-4d8d-9378-48a8c8546846:1. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_665c56e0-626a-4d8d-9378-48a8c8546846:1 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_666d662e-66f7-4e53-b4fd-06ccd55239bf:4. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_666d662e-66f7-4e53-b4fd-06ccd55239bf:4 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_6a39d117-9e22-4e11-8fcd-ebbf35b00688:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_6a39d117-9e22-4e11-8fcd-ebbf35b00688:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_6da53bf1-ab56-4a96-9af8-6df6d4b9972e:10. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_6da53bf1-ab56-4a96-9af8-6df6d4b9972e:10 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_70d0451a-94c0-4372-b19b-dd9e4246788f:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_70d0451a-94c0-4372-b19b-dd9e4246788f:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_716e6646-2efd-4d3a-9441-5563de429a01:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_716e6646-2efd-4d3a-9441-5563de429a01:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get dependency chain for App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_77493905-3008-4862-bd89-d5fad3318cfc:41, will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:50 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_77c479ff-bef7-456d-9bae-47ea1513e56f:4. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_77c479ff-bef7-456d-9bae-47ea1513e56f:4 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7925a429-49b4-4b04-8094-4987ca70a35b:7. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7925a429-49b4-4b04-8094-4987ca70a35b:7 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_79516c6a-a815-4c31-99fe-9ab4e4024e4e:1. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_79516c6a-a815-4c31-99fe-9ab4e4024e4e:1 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7af21e61-ffe4-4791-85ba-86d83cc9cf31:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7af21e61-ffe4-4791-85ba-86d83cc9cf31:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7d5204c1-26e4-489e-addb-1401d965153f:8. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7d5204c1-26e4-489e-addb-1401d965153f:8 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_7e5660da-b7c7-49dd-8940-7c751389f61a:3. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_7e5660da-b7c7-49dd-8940-7c751389f61a:3 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_85f4af90-a3f1-4d7e-bb6a-b079c20fa2d5:14. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/RequiredApplication_85f4af90-a3f1-4d7e-bb6a-b079c20fa2d5:14 chain will not be included in evaluation. CIAgent 24.01.2013 11:21:51 44 (0x002C)
CIAgentJob({5BCCC0E4-C16C-4F1D-85A7-F62515232072}): [JOB SCOPE] Failed to get digest for ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/Application_8908c4aa-5c4e-41fd-a111-e4be0780e6bb:2. App policy ScopeId_CF43FADB-8569-46DF-ADB2-984C3AA1E7B1/
Is it possible to reset Software Center?

This bug is still present in SCCM 2012 R2 CU3.
Remediation script has been optimized and written in Powershell. It will trigger a refresh only if application is found in WMI class.
If you deploy user-centric applications, you’ll need to change this code a little bit.
# Machine
$ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"
try {
    [int]$countMissingDTs = 0
    $Applications = Get-WmiObject -namespace root\ccm\clientsdk -query "select * from ccm_application"
    $AppsTotal = $Applications.Length
    $missingIds = @()
    foreach($App in $Applications) {
        $AppDT = [wmi] $App.__Path
        if($AppDT.AppDTs.Name.Length -eq 0) {
            #Write-Host $($App.Id)
            $missingIds += $App.Id
            $countMissingDTs = $countMissingDTs + 1
    #Write-Host $countMissingDTs
    if ($countMissingDTs -gt 0) {
        foreach ($appId in $missingIds) {
            $assignments = Get-WmiObject -query "select AssignmentName, AssignmentId, AssignedCIs from CCM_ApplicationCIAssignment" -namespace "ROOT\ccm\policy\Machine"
            if ($assignments -ne $null) {
                foreach ($assignment in $assignments) {
                    $assignedCI = $assignment.AssignedCIs[0]
                    #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId) $($assignedCI.CI.ID)"
                    $assignedCISplit = $assignedCI.CI.ID.Split("/")
                    #Write-Host $($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application"))
                    if ($($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application")) -eq $appId) {
                        #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId)"
                        $sched=([wmi]"root\ccm\Policy\machine\ActualConfig:CCM_Scheduler_ScheduledMessage.ScheduledMessageID='$($assignment.AssignmentId)'");
                        $sched.Triggers=@('SimpleInterval;Minutes=1;MaxRandomDelayMinutes=0');
                        $null = $sched.Put()
                        sleep -milliseconds 3000
                    } else {
                        #Write-Host "Skip assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName)"
            } else {
                #Write-Host "$appId not found"
} catch {
    #Write-Host $_.Exception
    return $false
return $true
User-centric application deployment:
# User
$ErrorActionPreference = "Stop"
try {
    [int]$countMissingDTs = 0
    $Applications = Get-WmiObject -namespace root\ccm\clientsdk -query "select * from ccm_application"
    $AppsTotal = $Applications.Length
    $missingIds = @()
    foreach($App in $Applications) {
        $AppDT = [wmi] $App.__Path
        if($AppDT.AppDTs.Name.Length -eq 0) {
            #Write-Host $($App.Id)
            $missingIds += $App.Id
            $countMissingDTs = $countMissingDTs + 1
    #Write-Host $countMissingDTs
    if ($countMissingDTs -gt 0) {
        foreach ($appId in $missingIds) {
            $sidObjs = ( get-wmiobject -query "SELECT UserSID FROM CCM_UserLogonEvents WHERE LogoffTime = NULL" -namespace "ROOT\ccm")
            if ($sidObjs -ne $null) {
                foreach ($sidObj in $sidObjs) {
                    $sid = $sidObj.UserSID.replace('-','_');
                    $assignments = Get-WmiObject -query "select AssignmentName, AssignmentId, AssignedCIs from CCM_ApplicationCIAssignment" -namespace "ROOT\ccm\policy\$($sid)"
                    if ($assignments -ne $null) {
                        foreach ($assignment in $assignments) {
                            $assignedCI = $assignment.AssignedCIs[0]
                            #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId) $($assignedCI.CI.ID)"
                            $assignedCISplit = $assignedCI.CI.ID.Split("/")
                            #Write-Host $($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application"))
                            if ($($assignedCISplit[0]+"/"+$assignedCISplit[1].replace("RequiredApplication", "Application")) -eq $appId) {
                                #write-host "Processing Assignment $($assignment.AssignmentName) $($assignment.AssignmentId)"
                                $sched=([wmi]"root\ccm\Policy\$sid\ActualConfig:CCM_Scheduler_ScheduledMessage.ScheduledMessageID='$($assignment.AssignmentId)'");
                                $sched.Triggers=@('SimpleInterval;Minutes=1;MaxRandomDelayMinutes=0');
                                $sched.Put()
                                sleep -milliseconds 3000
            } else {
                # Write-Host "$appId not found"
} catch {
    # Write-Host $_.Exception
    return $false
return $true

Newly created Applications do not appear in Software Center or Application Catalog

I'm still rather new to SCCM; but I'm slowly working towards configuring an application to be deployed to my clients via an application package that I configured. I set something up for deployment, and it's my understanding that the app should show
up in the software center for the users that it's deployed to.
However, I'm having an issue where not only is it not showing up, but it's not being installed on the clients I've deployed it to. The main problem is that I have no idea how to troubleshoot this - I don't know what logs to look at for issues (or where
the logs are); and I've been having a ton of trouble locating 'basic troubleshooting' info for application deployment.
If anyone could point me towards info that can get me on the right path for troubleshooting why my application isn't either automatically installing on the clients or why it isn't showing in the software center/application catalog, that would be very helpful.
Thanks!

I created the app on Monday, then did the deployment to a computer collection; Tuesday I read something that implied for it to show in software center it had to be deployed to a user collection, so I did that. I have told it to distribute the content
to all 3 of my distro points (three physical offices, one DP in each office), and I did that on Monday, then again on Tuesday when I deployed to the user collection.
Looking at it now, it seems as though the content hasn't been deployed to the other DP's yet though. When I go to Monitoring - Distribution Status - Content Status and select the application I created, it shows the status as 1 success (primary office/sccm
site/where the content was located when I created the package), and two as 'in progress' (other two sites), but has shown in progress for over 24h now. When I look at the further detail for the distribution - for one site the message shows last status
time of yesterday at 4:30pm and says "the content files for package <package id> have not yet arrived from the source site." the other one has the same last status time, but says "distribution manager instructed scheduler to send
package <package id> to child site."
So either the distribution is taking forever or it hasn't updated the status since it finished. Either way, maybe this is the par that I need to look into?

Software Center reporting question

Usually when I push out MS updates they would usually show up in the software center under "Installed software" it doesn't show anything after the updates are installed. It does shows up in windows update under "view update history".
MSB

Correct. That's default behavior.
My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

Update window show "connecting to update server" and will not connect.

Software Update window shows: "Downloading Firefox" and under the blue barber line "Connecting to the Update Server".... this has been going on for several hours and it does not appear to be downloading the update. I have been trying for several weeks with the same problem.

I have already tried re-installing the newest version, and I still get the "update" alert, and the not-connecting.
At the moment, I just close the window and carry on, but it's a bit annoying.

Show Downloads Button

I'm working on a 2009 desktop iMac with Mavericks 10.9.4
I've been trying to figure out why my downloads from websites don't appear in my downloads folder, with the help of some of the community members. I was gone for a few days, so that stream ended.
So now what I'm looking at is the Show Downloads Button on the Safari toolbar. When I attempt a download (say for a flashplayer update) the Show Downloads Button does pop up, but then disappears so fast I can't click on it. And then when I go to the Downloads Folder in Finder, my download does not show up.
Today I needed to download a Firmware update for my printer. The Show Downloads Button appeared and I rushed to click on it. I got it just in time and was able to successfully install my update. From my experience with the speed of previous downloads, I don't know if I'll be able to catch it every time.
I've added the Downloads Stacks to my Dock, but that doesn't show downloads that need to be installed.
I've turned off all Safari Extensions. The only Community suggestion I haven't followed up on is one that says I may have a corrupt system and need to take it to the Genius Bar.
Can anyone think of anything that I can do to slow down the Show Downloads Button so I can use it the way it was meant to be used?

Try clicking on View, then clicking the Show Downloads text in that menu. When I tried that, the button dissapears after you clear them.

Update deployment shows downloading 0% in Software center.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for