Update statement taking long time

Hi All,
The following query is taking too much time for update the 100000 records.
Please tell me how can this query time get reduced.
DECLARE
   CURSOR cur IS
     SELECT c.account_id FROM crm_statement_fulfilled_sid c;
BEGIN
   FOR i IN cur LOOP
     UPDATE crm_statement_fulfilled_sid a
        SET a.rewards_expired = (SELECT abs(nvl(SUM(t.VALUE), 0))
                                   FROM crm_reward_txns t
                                  WHERE txn_date BETWEEN
                                        (SELECT (decode(MAX(csf.procg_date) + 1,
                                                        NULL,
                                                        to_date('01-May-2011',
                                                                'DD-MM-YYYY'),
                                                        MAX(csf.procg_date) + 1))
                                           FROM crm_statement_fulfilled csf
                                          WHERE csf.procg_date < '01-aug-2012'
                                            AND account_id = i.account_id) /*points_start_date_in*/
                                    AND '01-aug-2012'
                                    AND reason = 'RE'
                                    AND t.account_id = i.account_id);
   END LOOP;
END;Any help?
Sid

Hoek wrote:
Second: you're doing row-by-row (= slow-by-slow) processing.
See if you can rewrite your code into a single SQL UPDATE statement that will process an entire SET at once.Well to be nitpicking. The op already does a single big update. He just does it again and again and again for each account id. Each time completely overwriting the values from the last account id.

Similar Messages

  • Replication update statement takes long time

    Hi Replication experts,
    I have a issue and please suggest if my understanding and solution is correct.
    We have a transactional replication setup for data warehouse, from today morning replication got huge latency so when I looked into it I saw the "sp_MSupd_< tablename >" was running for very long time and by this time it was running for 9 hours
    still no data was updated, Latency went very high. What we feel is that the index maintenance was not done in subscriber also it was not replicated too. So due to high fragmentation the update statement could take very long.
    As there was no error message or blocks found all we see is the update taking very long. So to avoid this we are planning to remove the index, as this is just data warehouse index maintenance is not required by removing we can gain some space too. Is this a
    good Idea to implement?
    When we ran profiler nothing was found, no error or alert logged.
    Please let me know your suggestions
    Thanks
    Best Regards Moug

    Hi All,
    The Issue we found to be is that a day before, new column was added to the table and 9000 rows were updated ... This caused the distributor to slow down the update operation as the index in subscriber(15 million rows) was updating every time  a row
    is updated.. So we suspect that adding a new column and updating it at the same time is the culprit..
    But still am not convinced as per my understanding the distributor operates by comparing the primary key of publisher that was changed with the primary key of the subscriber and apply those change.. If that is the case why should it worry about the new column
    added or the number of updates..
    Also one strange thing is another table was also lagging behind in its operation ,though that table was updated with just 18 rows.. So in a nutshell the update operation was totally down by distributor operation on that day..
    Can someone please shed some light on this, Replication is my favorite topic but now I got fear of it.. after failing to know what could be issue... 
    Best Regards Moug

  • Update statement takes long time - Why so ?

    Dear DBAs;
    Daily update statement takes 20 mins. But today update takes more time.
    What is the reason how to resolve ?
    Thanks in advance ..

    8f953842-815b-4d8c-833d-f2a3dd51e602 wrote:
    Dear DBAs;
    Daily update statement takes 20 mins. But today update takes more time.
    What is the reason how to resolve ?
    Thanks in advance ..
    More time? How much more?

  • Update script taking long time....

    Dear all,
    I have to update more then 2 mil records in a table but below update script took whole day still did not finish, is there any other way to enhance this update statement.
    update  customer_table  p
      set P.ic_no   = fn_change_iden_no_dirct(p.v_ic_no, p.ic_code)
      where P.ic_no is not null
    " fn_change_iden_no_dirct"  is a finction which returns the correct ic_no?
    BELOW IS THE COSTING OF THE ABOVE UPDATE SCRIPT
    ID     PID     Operation     Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost     CPU Cost     IO Cost
    0          UPDATE STATEMENT     2292K     34M     1192            1192
    1     0     UPDATE CUSTOMER_TABLE                              
    2     1       TABLE ACCESS FULL  CUSTOMER_TABLE     2292K     34M     1192       1192
    .....Thank you

    One reason the update is slow is because Oracle will do two switches between the SQL engine and the pl/sql engine for each row that it has to process. Such a switch usually is very slow. In 11g you could profit from funcion result cache. But the best way would be not to use a user-defined pL/sql function.
    I just noticed that you will do 4 context switches because inside of your function you do a not needed SELECT to get the length.
    First thing I would do is replace
    BEGIN
          select length(trim(PI_INSTR))
          into lv_length from dual;
    ...with
    BEGIN
          lv_length := length(trim(PI_INSTR));
    ...Here is a version where I tried to copy the logic from your function to the SQL statement. Also note that I tried to update only those rows that require a change.
    starting point
    update  customer_table  p
      set P.ic_no   = fn_change_iden_no_dirct(p.v_ic_no, p.ic_code)
      where P.ic_no is not null
      and P.ic_no  != fn_change_iden_no_dirct(p.v_ic_no, p.ic_code)
    changed logic
    update  customer_table  p
      set P.ic_no =
            decode(p.ic_code
                       /* NEW IC part */
                       ,'NEWIC', case when  length(trim(p.v_ic_no)) = 12
                                       then substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),1,6)||'15'||'999'||substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),12,1)
                                       when length(trim(p.v_ic_no)) > 12
                                       then substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),1,6)||'15'||'999'||substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),-(length(trim(p.v_ic_no)) -11))
                                       when length(trim(p.v_ic_no)) between 8 and 11
                                       then substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),1,6)||'15'||'999'
                                       else p.v_ic_no
                                 end
                       /* IC part */
                       ,'UIC', case when  length(trim(p.v_ic_no)) > 4
                                       then substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),1,1)|| substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),4,1)||substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),3,1)||substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),2,1) ||substr(trim(p.v_ic_no),- (length(trim(p.v_ic_no)) -4))
                                       else p.v_ic_no
                                 end
                       /* else part */
                       ,p.v_ic_no)
      where P.ic_no is not null
      and (p.ic_code in ('NEWIC','UIC')  or   p.v_ic_no !=  P.ic_no)
       ;Edited by: Sven W. on Jul 5, 2010 1:35 PM

  • Insert Statement taking longer time

    Hi,
    One of my insert statement inside the procedure is taking more than 10secs to complete.
    Scenario:
    1. Having three tables e.g invoice table - invoice header, invoice Item and invoice attribute
    2. These tables are loaded with data in the above specified order and they are not commited till all the data for an invoice gets inserted sucessfully.
    e.g
    a. Invoice header gets inserted first(one row)
    b. Invoice Item second(will be in a loop with more than one row)
    c. For every Invoice item an invoice attribute will be inserted
    (Invoice Attribute has a FK column with a PK column in invoice item table column)
    The problem is while inserting data into InvoiceAttribute it takes more than 10sec, IF the FK(mentioned above) is disabled insert statement is running fine.
    note: Invoice Item table has 8.4million records
    My assumption :
    while inserting into Invoice attribute table the insert statement validated the FK with the invoice item table, since the new Inovice item id(PK column in invoice Item table) is not commited the insert statement takes time to validate the FK against (8.4million records)......
    Please suggest me a solution.....................
    Thanks in advance
    NaveenPeri

    I'll try with a blind shot : The FK is likely missing an index, thus performing full table scan on invoice attribute each time you perform an insert on the invoice attribute table.
    By default an FK doesn't have an index. You must create one manually.
    If this turns out to be a missfire then please post a plan with statistics for the attribute insertion.
    Message was edited by:
    76°®

  • Delete Statement taking long time

    Can anyone help for the below query:
    DELETE FROM apm_prod_mst_interface
         WHERE plant_code= 'CAPL'
    AND trunc(start_date) = '20-FEB-2008'
    AND shift = p_mb_details.shift
    AND formula_class = p_mb_details.formula_class
    AND item_no = p_batch_details.item_no
    AND line_no = p_mb_details.line_no
    AND nvl(formula_no,'1') = NVL('ASCC1','1')
    AND nvl(formula_vers,-1) = NVL(13,-1)
    AND uom = 'KG'
    AND NVL(routing_no,'-1') = NVL('SFSDF-2','-1')
    AND NVL(routing_vers,0) = NVL(14,0)
    AND NVL(plan_start_date,trunc(sysdate)) = NVL('20-FEB-2008',trunc(sysdate))
    AND NVL(expct_cmplt_date,trunc(sysdate)) = NVL('20-FEB-2008',trunc(sysdate))
    AND user_name = 'DUMMY'
    AND schedule = 2
    AND plan_qty > 0;
    Regards

    Check the High Water Mark of the table!
    If the table has lots of inserts & deletes all the time, the HWM may be 1000 miles away from the actual data (But Orcale will need to read all the blocks to determine if they are empty).
    Has the table been analyzed recently?
    Explain plan for the equivalent SELECT?
    IF you have index'es on all the fields, then an update will take time, since it has to update 15-20 indexes.
    I would:
    1) Try to time just the SELECT (explain plan & autotrace)
    2) Gather stats
    3) SELECT again - and see if difference?
    4) If not -> ALTER TABLE <name> MOVE (to fix HWM)
    5) SELECT again
    best regards
    Mette

  • Update ztable is taking long time

    Hi All,
    i have run the 5 jobs with the same program at a time but when we check the db trace
    zs01 is taking long time as shown below.here zs01 is having small amount of data.
    in the below dbtrace for updating zs01 is taking 2,315,485 seconds .how to reduce this?
    HH:MM:SS.MS Duration     Program   ObjectName  Op.   Curs   Array   Rec     RC     Conn     
    2:36:15 AM     2,315,485     SAPLZS01  ZS01       FETCH  294     1     1     0     R/3     
    The code as shown below
    you can check the code in the program SAPLZS01 include LZS01F01.
    FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
    IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
        IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
          EXIT.
        ELSE.
          SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM  ZS01
                 WHERE  PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
          CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
          ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO ZS01-ERR_AMT.
          ADD 1           TO ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
          UPDATE ZS01.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    my question is when updating the ztable why it is taking such long time,
    how to reduce the time or how to make faster to update the ztable .
    Thanks in advance,
    regards
    Suni

    Try the code like this..
    data: wa_zs01 type zs01.
    FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
    IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
        IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
          EXIT.
        ELSE.
          SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM  ZS01
                 WHERE  PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
    -- change
      CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
          ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO wa_ZS01-ERR_AMT.
          ADD 1           TO wa_ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
          UPDATE ZS01 from wa_zs01.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    And i think this Select query for ZS01 is inside the ZS02 SELECT statement,
    This might also make slow process.
    If you want to make database access always use Workarea/Internal table to fetch the data
    and work with that.
    Accessing database like this or with Select.... endselect is an inefficient programming.

  • Delete statements are taking longer time

    Hi All,
    I have an issue with delete statement. below are my oracle DB details.
    SQL>select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    CORE 11.1.0.6.0 Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    I have a schema in the database which has 120 tables in it. The problem is, when the QA team is deleting the customers from customer table, it is running long time and haven't completed. this customer table have FK relation with other tables and have all the right indexes in place. then i have tried to identified the problem, why it is taking long time, and found that when they are running this delete query at the same time application is also running. the sessions created by application are locked most of the table and at the same time the delete session is also waiting for exclusive lock on those table. I given the same info to QA team and asked to stop the application when they deleting the customers. Then they said, they don't want to stop the application and the delete has to work and they asked for different solution. Here i am not sure, what solution i need to provide them.
    Can you please suggest me a approach and Thanks in advance.

    Hari wrote:
    and at the same time the delete session is also waiting for exclusive lock on those table. The only way the delete session could be waiting for an exclusive lock on the table is if the code to delete from the customer includes the command: lock table customer in exclusive mode;Unless your original description is wrong, either the deletion code has to change or the application has to stop modifying the customer table.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis
    http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
    Author: <b><em>Oracle Core</em></b>

  • Master Dataload is taking long time to complete

    Hi
    In last couple of weeks, we are experience the delay for master dataload job. These dataload should take 5-8 minute to complete but it is taking more then 5 hour to complete. here we are using process chain for master dataload.
    Any idea? We don't understand where to start to check the root cause of this problem.
    Regards
    Amar

    Hi Freinds
    Some update of our master dataload. Still not resolved.
    Seem to me, our problem is related to Hierarchy in BW server.It is taking long time to update the hierarchy in BW server. As i told you, problem occur only when loading master dataload. For transaction dataload, no IDOC get stuck in R/3 (NPR) server. There are enough resources in both R/3 and BW server for trfc.
    There are total 9 hierarchy in the master dataload that is delaying in the process for update. If you have seen this type of problem for the following hierarchy, pls update me.
    A     0ACCOUNT (InfoSource)
         Hierarchy
    1     Fin statement vers FSV5
    2     Cost Element by fun area
    B     0COSTCENTER (InfoSource)
         Hierarchy
    3     Mitel Network
    4     NA MNS Total
    5     CEO
    6     Global Support Cost center
    C     0COORDER (infosource)
         Hierarchy
    7     Total R&D (Ron Wellard)
    8     RD YRD1
    9     RD YRD2
    Regards
    Amarjit

  • Simple query is taking long time

    Hi Experts,
    The below query is taking long time.
    [code]SELECT   FS.*
      FROM   ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
             INNER JOIN
                   ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                INNER JOIN
                   GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
             ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE       FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
             AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
             AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) ='COMPLETED';[/code]
    this query is returning 1645457 records.
    [code]PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id  | Operation           | Name                   | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS      |                        |   611 | 14664 |    22   (0)|
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE             |  2290 | 48090 |    22   (0)|
    |   4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |     1 |     3 |     0   (0)|
    |   5 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              |  2324K|  1214M| 45076   (1)|
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Note
       - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
    15 rows selected.[/code]
    The distinct number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT FAX_STATUS,count(*)
    FROM fax_STAGE
    GROUP BY FAX_STATUS;
    FAX_STATUS    COUNT(*)
    BROKEN          10
    Broken - New    9
    Completed    2324493
    New             20
    SELECT is_deleted,COUNT(*)
    FROM  FAX_SOURCE
    GROUP BY IS_DELETED;
    IS_DELETED COUNT(*)
    N         2290
    Y         78[/code]
    Total number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC-- 2368
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_STAGE--2324532
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS_GLOBAL.GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING--9
    [/code]
    To improve the performance of this query I have created the following indexes.
    [code]Functional based index on UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) ,UPPER (FS.DESTINATION) and UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS).
    Bitmap index on FSRC.IS_DELETED.
    Normal Index on GBM.BU_ID and FSRC.BUID.
    [/code]
    But still the performance is bad for this query.
    What can I do apart from this to improve the performance of this query.
    Please help me .
    Thanks in advance.

    <I have created the following indexes.
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_DESTINATION_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("DESTINATION"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(LOWER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_BUID_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(BUID)
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(UPPER("FAX_NUMBER"))
    CREATE BITMAP INDEX ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(IS_DELETED)
    After creating the following indexes performance got improved.
    But our DBA said that new BITMAP index at FAX_SOURCE table (ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM) can cause locks
    on multiple rows if IS_DELETED column is in use. Please proceed with detailed tests.
    I am sending the explain plan before creating indexes and after indexes has been created.
    SELECT  FS.*
    FROM  ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
                    INNER JOIN
                    ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                  INNER JOIN
                      GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                    ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
                ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE      FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
              AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
              AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) =:B1;
    --OLD without indexes
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3076973749
    | Id  | Operation          | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS      |                        |  611 | 18330 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE            |  2290 | 59540 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  5 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              | 23245 |    13M| 45106  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
      1 - access(UPPER("FSRC"."FAX_NUMBER")=UPPER("FS"."DESTINATION"))
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      5 - filter(UPPER("FS"."FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    21 rows selected.
    --NEW with indexes.
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 665032407
    | Id  | Operation                        | Name                    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN                      |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS                  |                          |  611 | 47658 |    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    VIEW                          | index$_join$_002        |  2290 |  165K|    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    HASH JOIN                    |                          |      |      |            |      |
    |*  5 |      HASH JOIN                  |                          |      |      |            |      |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |  6 |      BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS|                          |  2290 |  165K|    1  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  7 |        BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM      |      |      |            |      |
    |  8 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN      | IDX_BUID_RAM            |  2290 |  165K|    8  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  9 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN        | IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM      |  2290 |  165K|    14  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 10 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID  |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  11 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | FAX_STAGE                | 23245 |    13M|  3096  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |* 12 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM |  9298 |      |  2434  (1)| 00:00:30 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
      1 - access(UPPER("DESTINATION")="FSRC"."SYS_NC00035$")
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      5 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      7 - access("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      10 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      12 - access(UPPER("FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    31 rows selected
    Please confirm on the DBA comment.Is this bitmap index locks rows in my case.
    Thanks.>

  • Fwrite() and fread() of a shared FAT32 formatted file is taking long time in MAC osx Lion C program

    Hi
    Is there any provision or api in MAC to open a file in shared mode same as windows
       hUSBdrive = CreateFile(pDriveName, GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING, NULL);
    we have the follwing scenario where a file is shared among two processes for read/write.one is running on Linux and the other one is running on MAC.where both the processses are reading/writing into the same memory location in the file say "X"
    FAT 32 formatted raw data file which is located on the device, is shared among two processes.
    One process is running on Linux device which is connected to MAC book through usb.In this linux process, the file is opened using fopen() and we have used fcntl() with O_DIRECT flag.This process continuously reads/writes data on memory location "X" in the shared file .
    The other process is running on Mac which has simple c program that opens the file on the connected device i.e from usb drive and reads/writes data using fread()/fwrite().fopen() is used to open the file and FILE_NOCACHE flag is used to avoid caching.
    The value at memory location "X" is updated by mac by using fwrite() and the linux process reads the memory location "X" by using fread(). Linux process is taking around 30 sec to get the updated value.
    If the value is updated by Linux process at memory location "X" by using fwrite() the MAC process is also taking long time more than a minute to read the updated value by usng fread().
    fwrite()/fread() on mac is taking long time where as the windows application which uses the same apis is taking msec time.
    Do we need to use other api s or flags to open file?
    thanks in advance.......

    does any one face this kind of problem?
    fwrite() and fread() takes long time?
    Is there any problem in read/write to a fat32 file on MAC?

  • Sales order creation, standard event trigger is taking long time .

    We have a requirement where we are sending data to CRM system using RFC function module. This data is sent while sales order creation or change. We have used standard event BUS2032.CREATED to trigger CRM FM in sales order creation mode. In sales order change mode, we are using custom event. In production system, our custom change event is getting triggered fine and data is sent to CRM system with small time lag of around 1 minute. But, while sales order creation, standard event trigger is taking long time ( sometimes about 20 minutes) in production system.
    We tried triggering same custom event at the time of sales order creation using FM u2018SWE_EVENT_CREATE_IN_UPD_TASKu2019 as well but, still we are not able to improve performance of the event trigger at sales order creation.
    Regards,
    Sushee Joshi

    HI,
    we have written SWE_EVENT_CREATE in update task
    I think instead of calling in update task simply call to function module CALL FUNCTION "SWE_EVENT_CREATE" might trigger the event immediately.. Did you try to check in this way..
    OR
    And I also suggest you to check the entry in SWE2 txn with respect to your workflow tempalte, may be you have enable the option ENABLE EVENT QUEUE, this could be one of the reasons.. If it is enabled please disable it (uncheck)
    Please check..
    Regards
    Pavan

  • VB Macro in Bex Analyser is taking long time to complete execution

    Hi Experts,
    In a FI query , we have a VB macro which update the excel sheets by taking values from the previous excel sheets .
    The issue is its taking long time for query execution and if we are keep on pressing 'ENTER' button . The query is running very fastly and is giving the results ,but its not a correct way to do.
    Its a critical issue in Production and can anyone help me to resolve the issue.
    Regards,
    Anju

    Hi Anju,
    I need to create a VB macro in one of my query but i not familiar how i can plug the VB code into the query.
    Please can you give me some basic procedure on how to do that?
    What i need to do exactly is to bring a KF from a query into another query. Not sure if this is possible using VB.
    Let me know.
    Thanks.
    Cesar

  • This part of query is taking long time to run, its about 40 minutes. Can anyone help wit it.

    ------Load Dataset into Temp table---------------
    SELECT
    z.SYSTEMNAME
    --,Case when ZXC.[Subsystem Name] <> 'NULL' Then zxc.[SubSystem Name]
    --else NULL
    --End AS SubSystemName
    , CASE
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT DISTINCT zxc.TIN
    FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc
    WHERE zxc.[SubSystem Name] <> 'NULL'
    THEN
    (SELECT DISTINCT [Subsystem Name]
    FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = zxc.TIN)
    End As SubSYSTEMNAME
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,SUM(z.SEQUEST_AMT) Actual_Sequestered_Amt
    , CASE
    WHEN z.SRC_PAR_CD IN ('E','O','S','W')
    THEN 'Nonpar Waiver'
    --**Amendment Mailed**
    --WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    When EXISTS
    (SELECT DISTINCT b.PROV_TIN
    FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b WITH (NOLOCK )
    where not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t where b.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    THEN
    (SELECT DISTINCT b.Mailing
    FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = b.PROV_TIN
    -- --**Amendment Mailed Wave 3 and 4**
    --WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID In
    When EXISTS
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t WITH (NOLOCK ) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t WITH (NOLOCK ) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
    -- --Is Puerto Rico of Lifesynch
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT DISTINCT a.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM PACT.dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE a.Bucket <> 'Nonpar'
    THEN
    (SELECT DISTINCT a.Bucket
    FROM PACT.dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE a.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    -- --**Top Objecting Systems**
    WHEN z.SYSTEMNAME IN
    ('ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM','ASCENSION HEALTH ALLIANCE','AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION','BANNER HEALTH SYSTEM','BERT FISH MEDICAL CENTER','BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL','BJC HEALTHCARE','BLOUNT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL','BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL','CAROMONT HEALTH SYSTEM','CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES','CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE PARTNERS','CHRISTUS HEALTH',/*'CLEVELAND CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM',*/'COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM','COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC','COXHEALTH','HCA','HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES','HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM','INTEGRIS HEALTH','JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER','LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM','MARTIN MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM','MERCY','MT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER (MIAMI)','MUNROE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER','NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM','NORTHSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM','SHANDS HEALTHCARE','SISTERS OF MERCY - SPRINGFIELD, MO','SSM HEALTH CARE','ST LUKES HEALTH SYSTEM','SUMMA HEALTH SYSTEM','SUSQUEHANNA HEALTH SYSTEM','TBD -- TRINITY HEALTH - CATHOLIC HEALTH EAST','UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI HEALTH SYSTEM','UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HOSPITALS','UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH CARE')
    THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Top Objector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
    -- --**Other Objecting Hospitals**
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Objector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Other Objecting Hospitals'
    -- --**Objecting Physicians**
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT z.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM SQS_EDW_Source z WITH (NOLOCK)
    WHERE EXISTS
    (SELECT DISTINCT
    obj.TIN
    FROM SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE obj.[Objector?] in ('Objector','Top Objector')
    and z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD not IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Objecting Physicians'
    --****Rejecting Hospitals****
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Rejecting Hospitals'
    --****Rejecting Physciains****
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT obj.TIN
    FROM SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector')
    and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD NOT IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'REjecting Physicians'
    ----**********ALL OBJECTORS SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUCKETED AT THIS POINT IN THE QUERY**********
    -- --**Non-Objecting Hospitals**
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT DISTINCT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h WITH (NOLOCK )
    WHERE
    (z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID)
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
    THEN 'Non-Objecting Hospitals'
    -- **Outstanding Contracts for Review**
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [PACT].[HUMAD\ARS3766].[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
    where qz.Mailing = 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    AND z.PROV_TAX_ID = qz.PROV_TIN)
    Then 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    When EXISTS
    (select
    p.prov_tax_id
    from dbo.SQS_CoC_Potential_Mail_List p WITH (NOLOCK )
    where p.amendmentrights <> 'Unilateral'
    AND z.prov_tax_id = p.prov_tax_id)
    THEN 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    WHEN EXISTS
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
    where qz.Mailing = 'More Research Needed'
    AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    THEN 'More Research Needed'
    WHEN EXISTS (SELECT qz.PROV_TIN FROM [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK ) where qz.Mailing = 'Objector' AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    THEN 'ERROR'
    else 'Market Review/Preparing to Mail'
    END AS [Updated Bucket]
    ,COALESCE(q.INDdesc, f.IND_desc) AS INDdesc
    ,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,f.Renew_Term_Ind
    ,f.Renewal_Date
    ,z.SMG_ID
    ,'' AS OrderedRank
    INTO SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG_on_SMGXXX
    From #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z
    left join #F f ON f.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID
    AND z.SYSTEMNAME = f.SYSTEM_NAME
    AND z.PROVIDERNAME = f.Provider
    Left join #Q q ON z.PROV_TAX_ID = q.TIN
    GROUP BY z.SYSTEMNAME
    --,Z.[SubsystemName]
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,q.INDdesc
    ,f.IND_Desc
    ,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,f.Renew_Term_Ind
    ,f.Renewal_Date
    ,z.SMG_ID
    ,z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD
    As I am a developer I do not have the access to Sql profiler or tuning agent to optimize my query, I have used some joins over the temp table #HIHO which indeed pulling the records from table EDW_Source which has 5 million records, I also added Non clustered
    indexes on prov_ID, SMG_ID and Incurred month for this table, but still it is taking longer time. Need help

    Hi, It needs some more tweaks but pls try this one
    USE
    Go
    --****Create sqs_objector_TINs (Objections and Rejections)****
    --Drop table .dbo.sqs_objector_TINs
    select distinct a.TIN as Prov_TIN
    Into #sqs_objector_TINs
    from .dbo.sqs_provider_tracking as a with (nolock)
    where a.[Objector?] in ('Top Objector','Objector','Rejector')
    /*********** Query for SQS_TINtoSyst***********/
    --DROP TABLE .dbo.SQS_TINtoSystem
    select distinct
    b.SRC_PROV_ID
    --,case
    -- when a.SYSTEM_NAME is null
    -- then
    -- case
    -- when a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME is null
    -- then a.PROV_SMG_NAME
    -- else a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME
    -- end
    -- else a.SYSTEM_NAME
    --end as SYSTEM_NAME
    ,COALESCE(a.SYSTEM_NAME, a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME, a.PROV_SMG_NAME) AS SYSTEM_NAME
    INTO #SQS_TINtoSystem
    from
    PARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_MASTER a with (nolock)
    Inner Join PARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_ID_XREF b with (nolock)
    on a.SMG_ID = b.SMG_ID
    -- Inner Join .dbo.SQS_EDW_Source q
    --on b.SRC_PROV_ID = q.PROV_TAX_ID
    where b.SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
    and exists
    select
    SMG_ID
    from PARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_ID_XREF as t1 with (nolock)
    where SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
    and exists (select q.PROV_TAX_ID from .dbo.SQS_EDW_Source q with (nolock) where q.PROV_TAX_ID = b.SRC_PROV_ID)
    and a.SMG_ID = t1.SMG_ID
    /************** Query for SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG*****************/
    DROP TABLE .dbo.SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG
    --Create temp table
    SELECT z.SYSTEMNAME
    ,Z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,z.SEQUEST_AMT
    ,case when Z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HI','HO') Then 'H' else 'P' end as Hosp_Ind
    ,Z.SMG_ID
    INTO #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG
    FROM dbo.SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z with (nolock)
    WHERE (Z.Incurred_Mth >= convert(datetime,'01/01/2013')) and (Z.Incurred_Mth < convert(datetime, '1/1/2014'))
    --between convert(datetime,'01/01/2013') and convert(datetime, '12/31/2013 23:59:59.996')
    --YEAR(Z.Incurred_Mth)=2013
    -- Create Temp table Q
    select
    x.TIN,
    case when max(x.IND) = 'NYN'
    then 'Standard'
    when max(x.IND) = 'YNN'
    then 'Express'
    when max(x.IND) = 'NNY'
    then 'Non_Standard' else 'Mixed'
    end as INDdesc
    Into #Q
    FROM
    (SELECT
    a.tin,
    MAX(a.express) + MAX(a.StandardInd) + MAX(NonstandardIND) as IND
    from
    (select r.TIN,
    case when MAX(r.Express) like 'Y%' then 'Y' else 'N' end As Express,
    case when MAX(r.Standard) = 'Y' then 'Y' else 'N' end As StandardInd,
    case when MAX(r.[Non-Standard]) = 'Y' then 'Y' else 'N' end AS NonstandardIND
    FROM DBO.SQS_Objectors_01032014 r with (nolock)
    GROUP BY r.TIN) a
    group by a.TIN) x
    group by x.TIN
    --Create Temp table F
    Select *
    INTO #F
    FROM(
    SELECT distinct g.prov_tax_id
    ,g.system_name
    ,g.provider
    ,case when g.reimburse_mixed = 'Y' then 'Mixed'
    when g.reimburse_express = 'Y' then 'Express'
    when g.reimburse_standard = 'Y' then 'Standard'
    when g.reimburse_NonStandard = 'Y' then 'NonStandard'
    end as IND_Desc
    ,g.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,case when g.Renewal_Date = 'N' and g.Expiration_Date = 'N'
    then 'Unclear'
    when g.Renewal_Date = 'N' and g.Expiration_Date <> 'N'
    then 'Termination'
    when g.Renewal_Date <> 'N' and g.Expiration_Date = 'N'
    then 'Evergreen'
    when g.Renewal_Date <> 'N' and g.Expiration_Date <> 'N'
    then 'Termination'
    else 'Unknown'
    end as 'Renew_Term_Ind'
    ,g.Renewal_Date
    FROM
    (select distinct
    bb.PROV_TAX_ID1 as prov_tax_id
    ,aa.*
    from
    [dbo].[Top_600_Hospitals3] aa with (nolock)
    left join pare.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_MASTER bb with (nolock)
    on --a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME = b.CTRCT_GRP_NAME
    aa.Provider = bb.PROV_SMG_NAME
    -- and (a.SYSTEM_NAME = b.SMG_SYS_NAME or a.SYSTEM_NAME = b.SYSTEM_NAME)
    --and a.ADDR_LINE1 = b.ADDR_LINE1
    and aa.STATE_CD = bb.STATE_CD
    --and a.ZIP_CD = b.ZIP_CD
    and aa.City1 = bb.CITY_NAME
    where aa.SYSTEM_NAME <> 'SEE ABOVE') g
    where g.system_name <> 'SEE ABOVE') h
    where h.ind_Desc is not null
    SELECT DISTINCT z.PROV_TAX_ID
    , z.SMG_ID
    INTO #HIHO_Records
    FROM SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z with (nolock)
    WHERE z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO', 'HI')
    AND Z.Incurred_Mth >=convert(datetime, '1/1/2013') and Z.Incurred_Mth <convert(datetime, '1/1/2014')
    --YEAR(Z.Incurred_Mth)=2013
    ---------------------------------Load Dataset into Temp table---------------
    SELECT
    z.SYSTEMNAME
    --,Case when ZXC.[Subsystem Name] <> 'NULL' Then zxc.[SubSystem Name]
    --else NULL
    --End AS SubSystemName
    , CASE
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT zxc.TIN
    FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc with (nolock)
    WHERE zxc.[SubSystem Name] <> 'NULL'
    THEN
    (SELECT top 1 [Subsystem Name]
    FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc with (nolock)
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = zxc.TIN)
    End As SubSYSTEMNAME
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,SUM(z.SEQUEST_AMT) Actual_Sequestered_Amt
    , CASE
    WHEN z.SRC_PAR_CD IN ('E','O','S','W')
    THEN 'Nonpar Waiver'
    -- --Is Puerto Rico of Lifesynch
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT a.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM .dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a with (nolock)
    WHERE a.Bucket <> 'Nonpar'
    THEN
    (SELECT top 1 a.Bucket
    FROM .dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a with (nolock)
    WHERE a.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    --**Amendment Mailed**
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT b.PROV_TIN
    FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b WITH (NOLOCK )
    where not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where b.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
    THEN
    (SELECT top 1 b.Mailing
    FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b with (nolock)
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = b.PROV_TIN
    -- --**Amendment Mailed Wave 3-5**
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID In
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
    where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (5th Wave)'
    and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
    THEN 'Amendment Mailed (5th Wave)'
    -- --**Top Objecting Systems**
    WHEN z.SYSTEMNAME IN
    ('ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM','ASCENSION HEALTH ALLIANCE','AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION')
    THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Top Objector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H'
    THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
    -- --**Other Objecting Hospitals**
    WHEN (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Objector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H')
    THEN 'Other Objecting Hospitals'
    -- --**Objecting Physicians**
    WHEN (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    obj.TIN
    FROM .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    WHERE obj.[Objector?] in ('Objector','Top Objector')
    and z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P')
    THEN 'Objecting Physicians'
    --****Rejecting Hospitals****
    WHEN (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    INNER JOIN .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector'
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
    )and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H')
    THEN 'Rejecting Hospitals'
    --****Rejecting Physciains****
    WHEN
    (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    obj.TIN
    FROM .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
    WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
    AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector')
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P')
    THEN 'REjecting Physicians'
    ----**********ALL OBJECTORS SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUCKETED AT THIS POINT IN THE QUERY**********
    -- --**Non-Objecting Hospitals**
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    h.PROV_TAX_ID
    FROM
    #HIHO_Records h
    WHERE
    (z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID)
    OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL)
    and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H'
    THEN 'Non-Objecting Hospitals'
    -- **Outstanding Contracts for Review**
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz with (nolock)
    where qz.Mailing = 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    AND z.PROV_TAX_ID = qz.PROV_TIN)
    Then 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    When z.prov_tax_id in
    (select
    p.prov_tax_id
    from dbo.SQS_CoC_Potential_Mail_List p with (nolock)
    where p.amendmentrights <> 'Unilateral'
    AND z.prov_tax_id = p.prov_tax_id)
    THEN 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
    (SELECT
    qz.PROV_TIN
    FROM
    [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
    where qz.Mailing = 'More Research Needed'
    AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    THEN 'More Research Needed'
    WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN (SELECT qz.PROV_TIN FROM [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz with (nolock) where qz.Mailing = 'Objector' AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
    THEN 'ERROR'
    else 'Market Review/Preparing to Mail'
    END AS [Updated Bucket]
    ,COALESCE(q.INDdesc, f.IND_desc) AS INDdesc
    ,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,f.Renew_Term_Ind
    ,f.Renewal_Date
    ,z.SMG_ID
    ,'' AS OrderedRank
    INTO dbo.SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG with (nolock)
    From #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z
    left join #F f ON f.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID
    AND z.SYSTEMNAME = f.SYSTEM_NAME
    AND z.PROVIDERNAME = f.Provider
    Left join #Q q ON z.PROV_TAX_ID = q.TIN
    GROUP BY z.SYSTEMNAME
    --,Z.[SubsystemName]
    ,z.PROVIDERNAME
    ,z.STATECODE
    ,z.PROV_TAX_ID
    ,z.SRC_PAR_CD
    ,q.INDdesc
    ,f.IND_Desc
    ,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
    ,f.Renew_Term_Ind
    ,f.Renewal_Date
    ,z.SMG_ID
    ,z.Hosp_Ind
    /************************** Drop temp tables*********************/
    --DROP TABLE #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG
    --DROP TABLE #Q
    --DROP TABLE #F
    --DROP TABLE #HIHO_Records
    --DROP TABLE #SQS_TINtoSystem
    --DROP TABLE #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG
    --DROP TABLE #sqs_objector_TINs

  • HT201250 my time capsule is taking too much time indexing backup and then taking longer time to back up ( 207 days ) or longer !!! what shall i do ?

    my time capsule is taking too much time indexing backup and then taking longer time to back up ( 207 days ) or longer !!! what shall i do ?

    Try 10.7.5 supplemental update.
    This update seems to have solved this problem for many.
    Best.

Maybe you are looking for