Update Transfer requirement for partially picked Transfer Order

Hi,
I am looking for a functionality to update a transfer requirement for a partial picking.
For example, we have a TR for quantity 100 pieces and we have 80 pieces in stock, so we create a TO for 80 pieces and the remaining quantity on TR would be 20. Now we dont want to pick for the rest of the 20 pieces, instead we want the TR to be updated for  the quantity which will be picked i.e 80 Pieces.
Also, is it possible to put some kind of a rule which govern that the TR should be updated only if we are picking for atleast 80% of the quantity originally mentioned in the TR.
Thanks in advance,
Mike

Hi Frenchy,
Thanks for the answer. I have one more question.
Is it possible to automate it based on a movement type, so that every time we create a Transfer Order for this movement type the relevant TR will be automatically marked for 'final delivery'. This would help us, because then we would not have to go to WAM everytime to mark it as complete.
Or some kind of configuration that will dictate that only one Transfer order will be allowed for a Transfer Requirement and the TR will be set to complete as soon as the TO is confirmed.
Thanks,
Mike

Similar Messages

  • WRT54GS V7 resets when version update is required for PS3 content

    Been having this problem for a while now.  the router works fine most of the time.  But when a game or firmware update is required for the PS3 and is attempting to dowload the router will cycle off and back on and the dowload can not be completed.  This only happens when the version of something requires updateing.  I can dowload PSN store content, game online w/ no problem it only happens when version updates are needed.  Can anyone please help with this?

    I will check on the firmware version tonight.  I did see that in the configuration, but I am unsure how to upgrade it.  It ask me to name a config file I don't know what to do there.
    I can usually get the issue to resolve after repeated attempts at downloading.  it seems to be a timing and specific type of action issue.  It only occurs when the PS3 firmware needs updating or a new patch for a game comes out.  I can download PSN content without problems.  Patches will begin to download then the router cycles off/on and dowloading can not be competed.  However with enough attempts the timing will be such that the router will cycle after accepting yes that informs of the patch, but before actual downloading begins.  then i will get the 'Please wait...." screen that occurs prior to the screen with the download progress bar.  When the route recconects it jumps to the progress screen and I can get the whole patch to download and install.  It is just frustrating as takes several attempts to get it to time this way.
    I see that people are experiencning similar issues with other Linksys routers.  Was wondering if anyone knows what this only occurs with this particular function and with nothing else and how to fix. 
    P.S. thanks torque for the message, I will look into those products.

  • How to identify Sale Order costing is required for Items in Sales Order

    Howstandard cos estimate*w to identify Sale Order costing is required for Items in Sales Order?
    On which criteria we can conclude Sale Order Costing is reqd ?
    ? * means what and wat is the purpose and how to chk for the Item in Sales Order, either it is required or not**.

    Hi Dharamveer,
    The best way is to make the order qty is equal to the quantity delivered. This way, when some one looks at this order in future - they think that the order was for X and the delivery was for X qty is completed. They will not know the background of the issue unless they go through change log. Even in change log, they see that the Ord qty was adjusted, but may not understand why?
    The good practice is to make order qty equal to already delivered qty.
    Create a new line for the remaining qty and reject the same with appropriate reason for rejection. This way, any one can understand the background , the reason for rejection easily. Hope it helps !

  • Updated Information Required for KB: 159865

    Dear "dedicated
    team for the development issues who will be able to assist you accordingly."
    Please assist RE: 
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-performance/updated-information-required-for-kb-159865/e74cd617-49f7-4725-b0ac-3c1cc7cbc3f7
    Steve F

    Hi Kevin! I have been unable to reply on this forum for quite a while. Unfortunately, after being advised to delete and re-create my LIVE account, by a member of a Microsoft Support team, I tried replying, but received IIS errors, then the page simply wouldn't
    display the "reply box", no matter what browser or version!
    Beyond that, I don't have much of an update. I didn't think you were serious. What would you like me to check "%windir%\inf\setupapi.dev.log"
    for, specifically? I'm asking where to find a mapping, without even knowing how the mapping is done, or what it would be logged as, if it is logged at all! 
    Asking a vague question in response to a specific question, is by no means helpful. Again, I have various certifications from various companies as a Storage Administrator, Unfortunately, I have yet to get a certification of divination in regards to the source
    code of proprietary software.
    Someone who knows what the error message means in physical reality needs to explain it, because the message itself does not refer to physical reality in any coherent
    way. It seems to refer to an abstract identifier, although, that is of course, speculation at best.

  • Troubleshooting steps required for R/3 Purch order

    Hiya participants,
    Please can you explain the steps required to trobleshoot as why my SRM PO is not copying into our R/3 ECC5 system please?
    We definatley have an aqward situation which means that the PO is not replicating to R/3 training system. Our team have checked:
    1. BBP_PD but cannot see any error messages
    2. RZ20.
    3. Abap short dump and system logs
    4. Transactio types and number ranges settings in R/3 ECC5  and SRM.
    For example, do any function modules exist for us to step through? Our PO's are creating in SRM fine and have no notable errors. Any directions would be much welcome.
    Thanking in advance,
    Pooja Kaur.

    Hi.
    We have made this FM available for production SRM, but due to the reasons that the SRM Po is not displaying any error messages like error in process and as it it also not outputting any error message in the application monitor, i still cannot see causes for why the PO does not tranfer to our SAP backend. What i am able to confirm is that PO documents with the item category Material are not not transfering across as these items are from supplier hosted external catalogue. any orders created with item service do transfer to SAP production.
    Please input,
    warmest thanks,
    Pooja Kaur.

  • Order Status for partial return sales order

    Dear All,
    I am facing an issue at my client for which I am unable to find an appropriate reason.
    We have done a complete Sales order cycle: S.Ord - Delivery and Invoice (100qty). Now the customer returns a certain part of materials delivered (say 30qty). We are creating a sales order for this 30qty and creating a delivery (for 30qty) and credit memo.
    The problem here is that the status of returns delivery and credit memo is closed but the status of this returns order is shown as being processed and also is reflected in open orders report.
    Can anyone please suggest why this is shown as being processed and not as closed despite the returns order being fully delivered and invoiced?
    Note: the Completion rule for Item category of my returns order is set to B-Item is completed after full quantity has been referenced. Is it because of this? What would be the implications if I make this blank? Any other suggestions too would be highly appreciated
    Thanks and Regards,
    Rohan Gudavalli

    This is b'coz, you create Credit memo with reference to Return Order (sales order), not from return delivery.
    Further, if you check the standard copying control for VTFL ( Source: LR & Target: G2), you will not find config for this.
    In standard, we have standard Billing doc type for this, that is RE - Credit for Returns (VOFA order-related billing VTFA).
    So your standard process flow can be.
    RE (Return Order)
    -> LR (Return Delivery)
    -> RE (Credit for Returns)
    FYI, you can refer routine 2 - Ord-rel.credit memo from VOFM - Data transfer - Billing Document.
    And that is the reason, why it is recommended to take Sales order as reference, instead of invoice.
    Also, refer/check copying control config for VTFA for Return Order - RE to Credit for Returns - RE for Item category REN
    Regards
    JP

  • Deviation required for Division to create Order with billing reference

    Hi All.,
    I want to Create Order with the reference of Billing Document. Just consider one case.,
    Billing Document Sales Area is , ABC/10/BZ
    I am creating sale order for Sales area, ABC/DI/ST with reference of Billing Document having Division BZ.
    System will thow an error as "Division ST deviates from Division BZ".
    Is it possible to create order with such scenario???
    Is there any Division specific Copy control routine????

    Hi,
    In Sales document type, transaction VOV8, there is a field 'Check Division', which if checked will not allow a division different than the Sales area at the header of the Sales order. If you are trying a fresh cycle, you can remove this check which will allow entering a different division at item level without any problems.
    Plus if you create a new order with reference to the invoice of above stated order, system will allow a different division value at the item level. 
    Regards,
    Peeyoosh.

  • 2 step picking-can allocation TO be created for partial pick TO?

    Dear experts,
    For 2 step picking, let's say that I have 2 items in the pick TO which belong to different materials. I confirm only 1 out of the 2 items. Can I then proceed to create the allocation TO just for the 1 item which I confirmed or is it a must for me to perform full picking for all the materials in the pick TO before I can create the allocation TO?
    Thanks.

    Dear experts,
    Can anybody help me?

  • Preventing update to COPA tables for a particular Sales order type

    Hi ,
    We need to have incoming sales order transfer to COPA activated only for one particular sales order type activated.
    Earlier we implemented note 571697  for user exit to allow COPA update only for particular sales order type.
    This prevented the transfer of SO to actuals table, but off late the performance for VA01 and VA02 has decreased substantially.
    Upon checking, we found this is happening because of other CE4XXXX tables (excluding CE1XXXX) which are getting updated during creation/ change of SO. as the data in these tables is huge .
    If possible, please advise, right userexit to prevent update to these tables.
    Thanks.
    Neeraj

    Thanks for your inputs..I have few more queries on same.
    Initially we had incoming sales order activated in KEKF allong with implemented SAP note 571697, which helped us to update CE1XXXX only for a particular sales order type. This was initial requirement to have system updating COPA values only for one particular sales order type.Also, KEQ3 was also activated which resulted in updates to CE4XXXX. This was not a problem initially since we had few sales orders now that plant has grown old with more sales order (resulting in huge size of CE4XXXX) VA01 is impacted..
    Currently ,since we have KEQ3 activated so, Segment is created the moment we create sales order.. and table CE4XXXX is updated..
    As most of you have suggested to switch off sales order in KEQ3, i need to analyze the impact of this..
    From what i understand CE1XXXX will continue with updation for that order type... and CE4XXXX won't be updated in future..Please correct me if i am wrong..
    Also, please advise what all can be possible impacts on COPA reporting if I switch off from now onwards (client has been using this since long) , and what all should be the precautions that i should take while doing this.
    Thanks

  • Component pick release for partial quantity

    Hi All,
    For R12 environment , customer needs move order to be created for partial quantity using component pick release.
    As far as I know component pick release cannot be done for partial pick release and only possible when onhand qty is not available.
    Can any one pleas elet us know if we can have any alternate solution or easy customization so that client can edit the quantities before going to move order creation?
    Thanks
    Vasudha

    when the move order is created..update the allocation and then perform transact move order
    ex if for 10 qty move order is created..but if u wish to issue 5 qty to the job..then update the allocation..for the remaining u can just backorder the move order
    HTH
    Mahendra

  • FM/BAPI to update requirements assignment on a PM order

    Hello,
    I am working on a project which involves building interfaces between a client's SAP ECC system and a third party scheduling system. The orders are created in SAP, interfaced to the third party, where they assign resources and schedule appointments. Hence we need to build is inbound to SAP, to update the "requirements assignment" tab of PM order operations - transaction IW32.
    I have looked at BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN, but this doesn't provide this specific functionality.
    Does anyone know if there is any other type of function module which enables this to be created/updated?
    The data appears to be stored in table KBED - capacity requirements.
    Many thanks in advance,
    Peter

    Hi Balaji,
    After lots of search and trials, I have gave up on the function group CY_BT*.
    I eventually used direct update on the database tables of the Requirements Assignment.
    Using SQL Trace and Runtime Analysis of the transaction IW31/32, I have been able to imitate the standard SAP process for creation, update and deletion and the effect of every scenario on the database tables:
    KBED     Capacity Requirements Records
    KBEZ      Add. data for table KBED (for indiv. capacities/splits)
    KBKO     Header Record for Capacity Requirements
    Combine that with locking mechanism, you will get your results.
    Just build a Z-'BAPI'. The best cost-benefit balance, as far as I am concerned.
    Good luck,
    Kamal.

  • BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE to update reason for rejection of sales order item

    Hi,
    The FM BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE is not working properly as I am getting below error when try to update the reason for rejection at sales order item level.
    The delivery is done for this salesorder. Is it because the reason for rejection field is not as an input field when delivery done?
    error in return table is " Field 'ABGRU' cannot be changed, VBAPKOM 000010  ready for input"
    Request your suggestions to avoid this error.
    Thanks

    >
    anikaushi wrote:
    > Hi,
    > The delivery is done for this salesorder. Is it because the reason for rejection field is not as an input field when delivery done?
    >
    >  error in return table is " Field 'ABGRU' cannot be changed, VBAPKOM 000010  ready for input"
    >
    >
    > Thanks
    Yes, Most likely.. You can confirm this by trying to change a order without delivery and see if it goes thru (to ensure that you have passed correct parameters)...
    you may have to delete the delivery (and if billing document exist, cancel it), before you can reject the line item... it would be safer to raise an error message and let the users manually delete delivery document as long as you don't have large volumes of this scenario..
    Please see the SDN thread for how you can avoid this error...
    Re: Cancel Sale Order after Issued Billing

  • Backend Tables for Chargeback regarding Sales Order.

    Hi,
    I am Searching for the tables Chargeback Data regarding Sales Orders, and also Joins for sales tables.
    Can any one help me in this.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards
    Vamsi...
    Edited by: 965678 on Apr 29, 2013 6:05 AM
    Edited by: 965678 on Apr 29, 2013 6:42 AM

    Thanks for your inputs..I have few more queries on same.
    Initially we had incoming sales order activated in KEKF allong with implemented SAP note 571697, which helped us to update CE1XXXX only for a particular sales order type. This was initial requirement to have system updating COPA values only for one particular sales order type.Also, KEQ3 was also activated which resulted in updates to CE4XXXX. This was not a problem initially since we had few sales orders now that plant has grown old with more sales order (resulting in huge size of CE4XXXX) VA01 is impacted..
    Currently ,since we have KEQ3 activated so, Segment is created the moment we create sales order.. and table CE4XXXX is updated..
    As most of you have suggested to switch off sales order in KEQ3, i need to analyze the impact of this..
    From what i understand CE1XXXX will continue with updation for that order type... and CE4XXXX won't be updated in future..Please correct me if i am wrong..
    Also, please advise what all can be possible impacts on COPA reporting if I switch off from now onwards (client has been using this since long) , and what all should be the precautions that i should take while doing this.
    Thanks

  • How Partial picking can be allowed?

    Hi Experts,
    At our client site we have one requirement that once a delivery is created say for 100 qty., system should allow to do pgi for 50 qty. without completing the delivery so that remaining delivery doc. can be is used later. One option is to pick the partial qty. but system wont alow to do PGI for partially picked delivery.
    Kindly suggest.
    Thanks & Regards
    Girish

    Hi,
    You are right, you cant have difference in delivery qty and picking qty. They both always have to be same. Then only you can do PGI.
    Yo can do one thing, decrease the delivery qty to the qty i.e. 50 that you want to deliver then change the picked qty to this changed delivery qty. i.e. 50 and do PGI.
    Next time when you create delivery for the rest of qty. i.e. 50 system will automatically propose the remaining undelivered qty.
    But make sure you make the setting for partial delivery in ship to party master data as suggested
    Hopy you get some inputs
    regards,
    Sagar

  • Update rule/routine for 0PUR_C04

    hi experts,
    can someone give the update rule/routine for uploading 0ORDER_VAL(effective order value) into the cube 0PUR_C04 and the calculations for it?
    and also some explantion on how this effective purchase order value 0ORDER_VAL is calculated*??
    thanks

    Hi Surya,
    If you are using standard content for 0PUR_C04, you can get the update rule in standard update rules, which you can see in Business content on Metadata repository. For standard content four data source used to fill cube. Purchasing Group (2LIS_02_S011 ), Purchasing Data (2LIS_02_HDR), Pur.Data  (2LIS_02_SCL) and Purchasing Data (2LIS_02_ITM). The mapping for different update rules are done as:
    2LIS_02_S011: Direct Mapping
    2LIS_02_HDR: No Update
    2LIS_02_SCL: Routine (mm_convert_effwr)
    fill the internal table "MONITOR", to make monitor ent *ries
    IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '001' or "Bestellu *ng
    COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '011' or
    COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '021' or
    COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '004' or "LP
    COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '014' or
    COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '024' )
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-BWAPPLNM EQ 'MM'
    AND COMM_STRUCTURE-ORDER_VAL <> 0.
    perFORM LOC_CURR_CONVERT
    USING COMM_STRUCTURE-ORDER_VAL
    COMM_STRUCTURE-DOC_DATE
    COMM_STRUCTURE-ORDER_CURR
    COMM_STRUCTURE-LOC_CURRCY
    COMM_STRUCTURE-EXCHG_RATE
    CHANGING RESULT.
    if the returncode is not equal zero, the result will not be updated
    RETURNCODE = 0.
    else.
    RETURNCODE = 4.
    endif.
    if abort is not equal zero, the update process will be canceled
    ABORT = 0.
    2LIS_02_ITM: No Update
    Hope this will give you some lead.
    Regards,
    Kams

Maybe you are looking for