Updated CODE1 is showing wrong values in 2LIS_05_QE1

Hi all,
I'm using 2LIS_05_QE1 extractor to report over qualitative data in BW. When the code of the characteristics is updated, the extractor takes 2 records, before and after images. The extractor is gathering wrong values for the CODE1 field  in the before image.
REQUEST     DATAPAKID     RECORD     ROCANCEL     PPLNKN     MERKNR     CODE1     GRUPPE1     ZHLNSTAT
REQU_4KVR0APSV0RSZ7N70IOR0F95L     1     5120          5     40     0     CIBAU038     1
REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9             3     4045     X     5     40     0     CIBAU038     -1
REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9             3     4046          5     40     75     CIBAU038     1
REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9     3     4045     X     5     40     0     CIBAU038     -1
REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9     3     4046          5     40     75     CIBAU038     1
We have changed the characteristic two times, now we can see two of the before images with the ROCANCEL field marked with = 'X'. The problem appears in the second before image which is not taking the actual value of the CODE1 field (75), instead is showing the value in zero. Then, when I report over the key figure in the table above ZHLNSTAT (quantity of values) the results are showing 2 values for CODE1=75 and -1 values for CODE1=0.
Any ideas?

I have checked Datasource and CODE1 is not a hidden field...apart from this field there are other fields too which I can see in Datasource in R/3 about dont see them in BW ....
Please let me know what could be wrong.
Thanks,
Murtuza.
Edited by: Murtuza Morwala on Jun 27, 2009 7:36 AM

Similar Messages

  • Issue: - FBL1N - is showing wrong values

    Issue: - FBL1N - is showing wrong values    
    Hi SAP experts,
    We are executing T Code FBL1N and selecting all open enteries, and select all items like special normal items, G/L Transaction, noted items, parked items and customer items, we found that the balance is showing wrong for intercompany vendors.
    For Ex, if vendor is not created in company Code A and customer items are available in Company Code A then that items are coming for some line items and for some line items it is not?
    I have attached one example for the same. for all vendors data is coming properly but for indivisual vendor is it not.
    Please suggest why?
    Regards,
    Vijay

    Example :
    Vendor number 99 ans for the same  customer nO is C12 is created in company code ABC but vendor is not created and customer C12 is in PQR, now i am executing fbl1n for Company Code PQR for open item selecting all options like normal items, special G/L transaction, customer items  noted items and parked items, the line items related to Vendor number 99 for company Code PQR should not display, as vendor is not created but customer items are there, please let me know for some cases it is showing result and in same cases it is not why?
    Regards,
    Vijay

  • Color picker on Illustrator CC 2014 shows wrong values

    See the image above . The selected area filled color is e6e6e6 ( 230, 230, 230 ) but the color picker shows the wrong value 4d4d4d. Its happens only on Illustrator , What is this actually is there any problem with the color mode settings ? Please help me 

    You misunderstand me, so don’t be too quick to judge.
    I said that the Color panel was more efficient than the Color Picker. It has sliders so that you can adjust colours precisely as you wish first time, rather than just groping somewhere on a big area of colour in the Picker and then having to make fine numerical adjustments afterwards (plus an OK when you’re done).
    The Color panel is particularly useful when you are working in CMYK because it ensures that you get clean mixtures when you want them (which the Picker does not, without fine tweaking afterwards).
    And if you want to get shades of the same colour, you simply hold down Shift as you drag one of the sliders.
    In conjunction with the Swatches panel, I would go for the Color panel any time, but if you prefer the Picker that’s quite all right by me.

  • Saptranshost profile parameter showing wrong value

    Hi Expert,
    We are using EHP6 with sybase database on windows platform
    We get stuck while configuring stms.
    After working more on same issue we found that "DIR_TRANS" parameter showing wrong path in AL11 tx.
    "DIR_TRANS = \stats\sapmnt\trans"
    The correct value should "DIR_TRANS = \sapprd\sapmnt\trans"
    (Wrong host name showing in path as "stats" where it should be "sapprd" )
    After changing the value in profile parameter "SAPTRANSHOST" from RZ10 tx as "SAPPRD" issue get resolved.
    When I checked profile parameter "SAPTRANSHOST" from RZ10 in production system, its showing me following value:
    >>Unsubstituted standard value: STATS
    >>Substituted standard value: STATS
    Same I checked in Development system and showing as below:
    >>Unsubstituted standard value: $(SAPGLOBALHOST)
    >>Substituted standard value: SAPDEV
    My question is why "SAPTRANSHOST" profile parameter showing "Unsubstitued standard value" as "STATS" where is should be "$(SAPGLOBALHOST)"
    Sap not allowed to change the same. Only allowed "Parameter Val" in RZ10 tx.
    How to change "stats" as "$(SAPGLOBALHOST)" and what can be possible reason as value showing stats.
    Regards.
    Dev

    HI

  • After casting double to float debugger shows wrong value

    Hi,
    My colleaque found an interesting behaviour with Java debugger. I have made some tests and here are the results:
    Test code:
    double dNum = 43.680659;
    float fNum = (float) dNum;
    System.out.println("double number = " + dNum);
    System.out.println("float number = " + fNum);This is tested in Eclipse IDE 3.4.2 with following Java JRE versions:
    - 1.4.2_19
    - 1.5.0_14
    - 1.6.0_10
    And following JDK:
    - jdk1.5.0_16
    Eclipse IDE will show following values for variables in all platforms:
    dNum = 43.680659
    fNum = 43.74316Console will print:
    double number = 43.680659
    float number = 43.68066Testing also with command line debugger jdb. Java JRE version:
    - 1.4.2_19
    And following JDK:
    - jdk1.5.0_16
    Results are the same as in Eclipse IDE. Is there a bug in debugger environment?

    I managed to find bug report of this issue:
    http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6807341
    Information:
    Bug ID : 6807341
    Synopsis : JDWP: float value reported incorrectly
    Category : java:debugger
    State : 3-Accepted, bug
    Priority : 4-Low
    Submit Date: 19-FEB-2009

  • Standard program showing wrong values in ALV report

    Hi All,
    Standard Report 'RFBILA00' (Balance sheet P+L Statement) ,when i excute for classical list the output showing correct.
    But with the same test data when i run for ALV Grid control showing wrong valuse like.
    with same company code comparision year,comparision period ,comp periods...when i run classical list:
    PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION                                 5,194,871.12-
    RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD                    5,194,871.12-
    NET PROFIT/(LOSS)                                                        5,194,871.12.
    when i run in ALV for same above data, the result is:
    PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION                           9,307,137.09
    RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD              5,194,871.12-
    NET PROFIT/(LOSS)                                                 22,076,715.82.
    Please help on this....and this is standard report.. y its showing different for same data.
    Thank you
    Anu.

    Hi ,
    Same program  excuted once by selecting classical list is showing correct. And with same data excuted with ALV grid list showing wrong valuse.
    when selected with Classical list: for company code:8000,Reporting periods: 1-9,Reporting year:2009,Comparison periods:1-8
    Comparison year-2009.
    PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION 5,194,871.12-
    RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD 5,194,871.12-
    NET PROFIT/(LOSS) 5,194,871.12.
    when i run in ALV for same above data, the result is: for company code:8000,Reporting periods: 1-9,Reporting year:2009,Comparison periods:1-8 Comparison year-2009.
    PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION 9,307,137.09
    RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD 5,194,871.12-
    NET PROFIT/(LOSS) 22,076,715.82.
    Thank You,
    Anu.

  • Report Painter report showing wrong values

    Hi,
    We have a report painter report Y_DN3_47000280 which is Inventory by Plant. We have a plant which is sold out and is not working anymore under the company. But the report is still showing postings and values in tune of 183000...Can you please advise what is wrong and what setting is missing?
    Thanks,
    Prithwi.

    Hi Dianne,
    Thanks for the details. We checked MBEW table. There's a mismatch of the values between MBEW and Y_DN3_47000280 report. MBEW contains $109.6 and the Y_DN3_47000280 report contains $180333.00 for the plant.
    Can you pls tell from where these values are populating. The plant has been closed 3 months back.
    Thanks,
    Prithwi.

  • Key Figures With Hide can be shown showing wrong values when displayed in a query

    Hi Experts,
    I have a qiery with two structures in the column(cell Definition) three key figures are displayed and the rest are all hide can be displayed. However whenever i display one of the hidden key figures along with one displayed key figures it initially shoes incorrect values. Once i add another key figure (which has status always show) the hidden jey figure value gets corrected. Is it a problem with the structure? Kindly assist.For example  when i display the actuals(always show) and actuals rate(hide can be shown) the values for actuals rate are wrong , however when i add the plan rate(always ahow) the values for actual rate gets corrected. Screenshots for structures below.

    Hi Sayanto,
    For this I would recommend you to check the Key figure definition in all 3 situations.
    1. original display
    2. display of hidden KF
    3. Display of existing KF
    I suspect that cell references may have some effect on the calculation as you are adding the hidden KF in analyzer directly. You can prove this only by checking  Key figure definition.
    Please let me know if you are facing any issue in getting the Key figure definition itself.
    Also, as Cornelia suggested check if you have any constant selection applied to any of your KFs.
    Hope this helps.
    -Swati.

  • DatePicker shows wrong value on initial loading

    I have a column with a date picker, to make the content of the column editable.
    oCdColumn = new sap.ui.table.Column({
                label: "Übergabe",
                template: new sap.ui.commons.DatePicker({
                    value: {
                        path: "CD",
                        formatter: function (sDate) {
                            var date = new Date(parseInt(sDate));
                            console.log(date)
                            return date;
                    locale: "de",
                    change: [oController.onDateFieldChange, oController]
                sortProperty: "CD"
    The value I get from the path CD is in the format you get when you call .getTime() on a Date.
    On initial loading the datepicker displays some dates that are like 6 years after the date that should be displayed. When i navigate to another table page/ change the sort order and then navigate back/change the order to initial value the date is displayed correctly.
    How is this possible?

    Hi Frank,
    as you can see I logged the Formatter Output. It never showed me an incorrect date. I think parseInt of null returns NaN. When NaN was the Output of theFormatter the  DatePicker showed the current Date.
    I stepped through and for the first 5 lines (which is the default value for a table page) it put a correct Date in the table, the other values i can't see because the table page was full, but the console showed a correct date. After it finished running through all the formatters the
    visibleRowCountMode: sap.ui.table.VisibleRowCountMode.Auto
    was triggered and the dates were wrong.
    Thanks for the link with the type system. I tried it yesterday, but it gave me an undefined is not a function error. My mistake was that i just set the pattern and not the source pattern. When I set the source pattern to "timestamp" it worked. Thank you.
    For anyone who runs in the same problem: i would also recommend this link: sap.ui.model.Date
    Regards,
    Judith

  • TS1702 When I push updated apps it shows wrong user ID

    I Am trying to update my apps & it keeps showing the wrong user ID how do I change it to my user name

    You need to delete those applications and redownload or repurchase them from your Apple ID.
    (86297)

  • TO_Number Function showing wrong values

    Hi All,
              I am passing a Char value from oracle forms to oracle reports as parameter.
    In Report Query I'm converting the char value into number for comparison using TO_NUMBER() function. As the char value is large value like '001002004006004' it is converting to something like 1.2e+12 and my query results goes wrong. I want value, something like 1002004006004( as initial 00 will be removed).
    I'm using Oracle forms 10g and Reports 10g
    Can anyone please help me.
    Thanks
    Sandeep
    ----Don't think outside the box, Think as if there is no Box at all.

    Hi, Sandeep,
    Whenever you have a problem, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) that shows what the problem is, and the correct results you want from that sample data.  Explain how you get those results from that data.
    See the forum FAQ: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002#9362002
    Don't confuse how a number is displayed with what that number is.  SQL*Plus (and other front ends), by default, allows only 10 character spaces for displaying NUMBERs.  If you have a NUMBER that doesn't fit into 10 spaces, then SQL*Plus will round the digits after the decimal point.  If it still doesn't fit (which is the case with 1002004006004) then SQL*Plus will use scientific notation, rounding the decimal places.  The actual value (at least 38 significant digits) will be used in all computations, regardless of how the NUMBER is displayed.  I doubt if what you posted has anything to do with the real problem.

  • Software Update Compliance Status Showing Wrong

    Greetings,
    When reviewing software updates in the Software Library I noticed that one of them seems to be "stuck" with old information. It is showing the summarization results from a time in the past where it was correct, however it is no longer correct but
    it will not update to show the correct states.
    In short an update is showing as INSTALLED on several clients where it is clearly not installed.  I have verified the WindowsUpdate.log file with debug/verbose logging and on each client it reports as well that it is not installed. 
    Not sure how an update gets "stuck" on its states, but if there was a way to "reset" and update and have it place all the clients back in unknown and then allow for all the clients to refresh that would be great. Because no amount for
    forcing the scans and summarizations seems to make the update unstuck.

    No they are also wrong, I checked the DB tables and views which match the UI and Reports. Which is why I call it being "stuck" in an old state. The endpoints are running scans and their results are correct however either they are not getting up to the
    server or they are and the server is ignoring them.  The only odd thing is the other updates are correct. This could be meaningless because they were correct at the time the others got stuck with wrong info. So they all may actually be stuck in the old
    state.

  • F.19 report showing wrong values (GR/IR)

    Hello,
    At my company, they run the MR11 to check for GR/IR variances and then clear these variances using the F.13 transaction. However, when the F.19 transaction is run to analyze the GR/IR clearing account, there are some old PO's belonging to year 2005/2006 that still show up in the report. When these PO's are checked, there is no GR/IR variance.
    Could someone please explain the reason for this and if there is any way to remove these entries from the F.19 report?
    Thanks in advance,
    Rugmani.

    Hi,
    This is the wrong forum for this
    Rgds,
    Richard

  • IT 2001 shows wrong value

    Daily working hour is 9hrs (1 hour unpaid break), so actually it's 8hrs.
    but when i mark 9-1pm leave (4hrs), it shows 0.44 days leave instead of 0.50 days.
    What could be the reason?
    in wsr i tried with 9 hr and 8 hr also, but no changes.

    r us sure u created only one break schedule, check and let me know.
    go and check what ur dws shows, is it shows correct 8 hrs or more (i believe it's 9. That's y it takes 50% of 9 hrs). if more u might have created more break schedules.
    In that case u wont get correct value in 2001

  • SCCM 2012 Software Update Group Statistcs showing wrong Asset Count

    Under Software Update Groups in the summary tab the statics section shows total asset count: 5.   I only have this group deployed to only one collection with 1 machine.
    I have a second Software Update Group in the summary tab the statics section shows total asset count: 5.   I only have this group deployed to only one collection with 3 machines.
    The two collection have only one machine in common.
    I tried to run a summarization but these numbers are not updating. 
    where does the asset count come from and how do I get it to display correctly?
    Thanks,

    The asset counts shown in the console for software groups are not specific to any collection or deployment. If you want numbers specific to a collection, you need to use reporting or a console query.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

Maybe you are looking for