Updates and locks-up

Hi, I looking for some help with my shuffle. Ever since I upgraded to itunes, i've been having problems. As itunes is updating my tunes and podcasts, itunes suddenly locksup in mid stream. my only option is to manually force itunes to end and it doesnt lauch again until i reboot the pc. im preplexed. any suggestions would be appreciated. thanks...salty
dell Windows XP

Have you tried a reset ? Press and hold both the sleep and home buttons for about 10 to 15 seconds (ignore the red slider), after which the Apple logo should appear - you won't lose any content, it's the iPad equivalent of a reboot.
In terms of Safari you can try clearing its cache : Settings > Safari > Clear Cache (and Clear History).

Similar Messages

7.1.1 Update and Locked Screen Stopwatch

After I completed the 7.1.1 update, when I start a stopwatch and lock my phone, it will no longer show the time remaining on the locked screen when wake my phone up.
This was working properly before the update.

[UPDATE]
Sorry about misleading you and anyone on this forum. I should have double checked what was really wrong with my phone before posting this. It was not the stopwatch that had a problem of not showing on the lock screen, but it was the Timer that did not show on the lock screen after the 7.1.1 update. After I did a reboot (shutting the device of and power it back on), this corrected the issue and now I see the Timer on the lock screen.

Long running updates and lock escalation

I have a question about locking when updating tables from SAP on a MSSQL2005 database.
Once a month we have a report for updating several rows (1 mio) on a special ledger table.
This report is taken the update as one transaction because of the possibility for rolling back. It is ledger data so we want to keep the update safe.
When running this report the online users has access to the same table. The users can make INSERT into the same table without any problems.
But after 15-20 minutes runtime the whole table is locked by a table lock instead of row locks. Therefore the users goes into a "hanging" situations when trying to make INSERT into the table. The locks are held until our program has finished.
Is there any way to raise the level of row locking escalation on a MSSQL2005 database?
I have found the trace flag 1211 and 1224 but is it safe setting this on a production database?

Hii,,
I would suggest you to run the report when the users are not there as it is related to ledger table.
just schedule it at the low peak times.
Also the trace flags that you have mentioned can be harmful also
so i would better recommend not to use it.
Please refer to the link
http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverstorageengine/archive/2006/05/17/Lock-escalation.aspx
Also if u want to activate these traces I would recommend to talk to SAP before that
Rohit

Regarding the new update and lock screen backgrounds. Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 10 Android

Has anyone figured out how to change the lock screen background for the Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2s yet?

Yes that is correct! Serene! I received the Yoga Tablet 2 10 from you.
The Yoga Tablet 10 I used in the comparison and the benchmarks was the one I won from Lenovo Belgium.

Problem with unlocking and locking the Materials in MARA using idocs.

We are sending a inbound idoc from one cluster to the other to update the materials
If the material is locked ( MARA-MATFI=x ) before it needs to be unlock it ,update it and lock again .
If its not locked ,we just need to update it and lock the material .
When we are trying to implement this the materials are not getting locked at all times .
the update inbound idoc is being sent to 5 clusters at a time .
The same material is getting locked in some clusters and some it is not . (But the data is being updated in all the clusters )
Can you please suggest me a solution or give me an idea where the problem would be lying.

The client has a Keystone Server where alll the Master data is kept and there are 5 Production Servers .
When ever there are any updates to the Materials they are first updated in the Keystone server .
And with the help of a Batch Job they send inbound idocs to the 5 Production Servers.
On the Production servers if the material in MARA that needs to be updated is locked ,it needs to be unlocked updated and locked again .
Hope i have given u the clear idea of the scenario

HT4061 I down loaded a update and I think my phone was hacked my home screen says hello on different languages and then ask for my password on a strang screen

I am away on vacation. Received a email from apple asking to update my support.... It was a strange update and locked my phone
Then I got home screen that says hello in different languages and ask for my pass word

Restore the device via iTunes on the computer.

I downloaded the iPhoto update and now it won't open the library on my external hard drive telling me it is locked (which it isn't) what do i do?

i downloaded the iPhoto update and now it won't open the library on my external hard drive telling me it is locked (which it isn't) what do i do?

What version of iPhoto?
What format is the disk?

I am signed into the App Store on my iphone 4 and one of my apps need updating and my brother was signed into it but its like its locked to his Apple ID I have tried signing out and turning my phone off its just not working

I am signed into the App Store on my iphone 4 and one of my apps need updating and my brother is signed into it because I didn't have any credit to make an ID so he signed in so I could download apps but its like its locked to his Apple ID I have tried signing out and turning my phone off its just not working please help.

Apps are locked to the Apple ID that was used to download them. You will have to sign in as your brother in order to update it.

HT4623 Please help! i have just update my iphone 4s with 7.4 update and my phone is now asking for a password which i dont have. I have tried my keypad lock i used before the update and also my itunes password and neither work, how do i rectify this ??

Please help! i have just update my iphone 4s with 7.4 update and my phone is now asking for a password which i dont have. I have tried my keypad lock i used before the update and also my itunes password and neither work, how do i rectify this ???

Did you buy this iPhone new from an authorized seller?

Re: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update

Dale,
Sounds like you either need an "optimistic locking" scheme, usually
implemented with timestamps at the database level, or a concurrency manager.
A concurrency manager registers objects that may be of interest to multiple
users in a central location. It takes care of notifying interested parties
(i.e., clients,) of changes made to those objects, using a "notifier" pattern.
The optimistic locking scheme is relatively easy to implement at the
database level, but introduces several problems. One problem is that the
first person to save their changes "wins" - every one else has to discard
their changes. Also, you now have business policy effectively embedded in
the database.
The concurrency manager is much more flexible, and keeps the policy where
it probably belongs. However, it is more complex, and there are some
implications to performance when you get to the multiple-thousand-user
range because of its event-based nature.
Another pattern of lock management that has been implemented is a
"key-based" lock manager that does not use events, and may be more
effective at managing this type of concurrency for large numbers of users.
There are too many details to go into here, but I may be able to give you
more ideas in a separate note, if you want.
Don
At 04:48 PM 6/5/97 PDT, Dale "V." Georg wrote:
I have a problem in the application I am currently working on, which it
seems to me should be easily solvable via appropriate use of transactions
and database locking, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how to
do it. The database we are using is Oracle 7.2.
The scenario is as follows: We have a window where the user picks an
object from a dropdown list. Some of the object's attributes are then
displayed in that window, and the user then has the option of editing
those attributes, and at some point hitting the equivalent of a 'save'button
to write the changes back to the database. So far, so good. Now
introduce a second user. If user #1 and user #2 both happen to pull up
the same object and start making changes to it, user #1 could write back
to the database and then 15 seconds later user #2 could write back to the
database, completely overlaying user #1's changes without ever knowing
they had happened. This is not good, particularly for our application
where editing the object causes it to progress from one state to the next,
and multiple users trying to edit it at the same time spells disaster.
The first thing that came to mind was to do a select with intent to update,
i.e. 'select * from table where key = 'somevalue' with update'. This way
the next user to try to select from the table using the same key would not
be able to get it. This would prevent multiple users from being able to
pull the same object up on their screens at the same time. Unfortunately,
I can think of a number of problems with this approach.
For one thing, the lock is only held for the duration of the transaction, so
I would have to open a Forte transaction, do the select with intent to
update, let the user modify the object, then when they saved it back again
end the transaction. Since a window is driven by the event loop I can't
think of any way to start a transaction, let the user interact with the
window, then end the transaction, short of closing and re-opening the
window. This would imply having a separate window specifically for
updating the object, and then wrapping the whole of that window's event
loop in a transaction. This would be a different interface than we wanted
to present to the users, but it might still work if not for the next issue.
The second problem is that we are using a pooled DBSession approach
to connecting to the database. There is a single Oracle login account
which none of the users know the password to, and thus the users
simply share DBSession resources. If one user starts a transaction
and does a select with intent to update on one DBSession, then another
user starts a transaction and tries to do the same thing on the same
DBSession, then the second user will get an error out of Oracle because
there's already an open transaction on that DBSession.
At this point, I am still tossing ideas around in my head, but after
speaking with our Oracle/Forte admin here, we came to the conclusion
that somebody must have had to address these issues before, so I
thought I'd toss it out and see what came back.
Thanks in advance for any ideas!
Dale V. Georg
Indus Consultancy Services [email protected]
Mack Trucks, Inc. [email protected]
>
>
>
>
====================================
Don Nelson
Senior Consultant
Forte Software, Inc.
Denver, CO
Corporate voice mail: 510-986-3810
aka: [email protected]
====================================
"I think nighttime is dark so you can imagine your fears with less
distraction." - Calvin

We have taken an optimistic data locking approach. Retrieved values are
stored as initial values; changes are stored seperately. During update, key
value(s) or the entire retieved set is used in a where criteria to validate
that the data set is still in the initial state. This allows good decoupling
of the data access layer. However, optimistic locking allows multiple users
to access the same data set at the same time, but then only one can save
changes, the rest would get an error message that the data had changed. We
haven't had any need to use a pessimistic lock.
Pessimistic locking usually involves some form of open session or DBMS level
lock, which we haven't implemented for performance reasons. If we do find the
need for a pessimistic lock, we will probably use cached data sets that are
checked first, and returned as read-only if already in the cache.
-DFR
Dale V. Georg <[email protected]> on 06/05/97 03:25:02 PM
To: Forte User Group <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
cc: Richards* Debbie <[email protected]> @ INTERNET, Gardner*
Steve <[email protected]> @ INTERNET
Subject: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update
I have a problem in the application I am currently working on, which it
seems to me should be easily solvable via appropriate use of transactions
and database locking, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly how to
do it. The database we are using is Oracle 7.2.
The scenario is as follows: We have a window where the user picks an
object from a dropdown list. Some of the object's attributes are then
displayed in that window, and the user then has the option of editing
those attributes, and at some point hitting the equivalent of a 'save' button
to write the changes back to the database. So far, so good. Now
introduce a second user. If user #1 and user #2 both happen to pull up
the same object and start making changes to it, user #1 could write back
to the database and then 15 seconds later user #2 could write back to the
database, completely overlaying user #1's changes without ever knowing
they had happened. This is not good, particularly for our application
where editing the object causes it to progress from one state to the next,
and multiple users trying to edit it at the same time spells disaster.
The first thing that came to mind was to do a select with intent to update,
i.e. 'select * from table where key = 'somevalue' with update'. This way
the next user to try to select from the table using the same key would not
be able to get it. This would prevent multiple users from being able to
pull the same object up on their screens at the same time. Unfortunately,
I can think of a number of problems with this approach.
For one thing, the lock is only held for the duration of the transaction, so
I would have to open a Forte transaction, do the select with intent to
update, let the user modify the object, then when they saved it back again
end the transaction. Since a window is driven by the event loop I can't
think of any way to start a transaction, let the user interact with the
window, then end the transaction, short of closing and re-opening the
window. This would imply having a separate window specifically for
updating the object, and then wrapping the whole of that window's event
loop in a transaction. This would be a different interface than we wanted
to present to the users, but it might still work if not for the next issue.
The second problem is that we are using a pooled DBSession approach
to connecting to the database. There is a single Oracle login account
which none of the users know the password to, and thus the users
simply share DBSession resources. If one user starts a transaction
and does a select with intent to update on one DBSession, then another
user starts a transaction and tries to do the same thing on the same
DBSession, then the second user will get an error out of Oracle because
there's already an open transaction on that DBSession.
At this point, I am still tossing ideas around in my head, but after
speaking with our Oracle/Forte admin here, we came to the conclusion
that somebody must have had to address these issues before, so I
thought I'd toss it out and see what came back.
Thanks in advance for
any
ideas!
Dale V. Georg
Indus Consultancy Services [email protected]
Mack Trucks, Inc. [email protected]
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from pebble.Sagesoln.com by notes.bsginc.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9c for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1997Jun05.162418.1771.334203; Thu, 05 Jun 1997 16:24:19 -0500
Received: (from sync@localhost) by pebble.Sagesoln.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
NAA11825 for forte-users-outgoing; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:47:58 -0700
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by pebble.Sagesoln.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id
NAA11819 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 13:47:56 -0700
Received: from unknown(207.159.84.4) by pebble.sagesoln.com via smap (V1.3)
id sma011817; Thu Jun 5 13:47:43 1997
Received: from tes0001.macktrucks.com by relay.macktrucks.com
via smtpd (for pebble.sagesoln.com [206.80.24.108]) with SMTP; 5 Jun
1997 19:35:31 UT
Received: from dale by tes0001.macktrucks.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id QAA04637; Thu, 5 Jun 1997 16:45:51 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Priority: Normal
To: Forte User Group <[email protected]>
Cc: "Richards," Debbie <[email protected]>,
"Gardner," Steve <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dale "V." Georg <[email protected]>
Subject: Transactions and Locking Rows for Update
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 97 16:48:37 PDT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; X-MAPIextension=".TXT"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Dale "V." Georg <[email protected]>

My ipod touch is locked in expanded mode. It happens every time I do a itunes update. I've tried to soft reset then a hard reset. Neither has resolved the problem. The screen goes back to normal but expands and locks during sync. help

My ipod touch is locked in expanded mode. I can not get to the controls. It happens everytime I do an itunes update. I have tried a soft and a hard reset which fixes the problem but then during syncing the screen expands again and locks up. Help.

tell me abt software version ...????
was it jail break or not???
reply these two and i will tell u further...

I recently did the update and my text message notification was no longer working. Then I did a reset and now my locking function no longer works. What is going on???

I recently did the update and my text message notification was no longer working. Then I did a reset and now my locking function no longer works. What is going on???

What "locking function" are you talking about?

HT201328 Welcome to After I IPHONE 4 black and I want to open internationally so when you want to update the lock and leave me a sign I just want to open an apple and I have developed from my Mac in Saudi Arabia&

Welcome to After I IPHONE 4 black and I want to open internationally so when you want to update the lock and leave me a sign I just want to open an apple and I have developed from my Mac in Saudi Arabia& the
<Edited by Host>

If you want to unlock an iPhone you must contact the carrier it is locked to.
You are not communicating with Apple in these forums; we are just other users.

Ipad mini did update and now screen rotation is locked.. can this be fixed ?

I did and update for ipad mini and now the screen rotation is locked. I am seeing other posts about this update and am afraid this will be step one in more issues. Afraid to do the upgrade on my mac. Last time I had to take it in to the genius bar to have them fix it. Whaat? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks/

See the following for info on the Side Switch settings that can either control Orientation Lock (screen rotation) or Audio Mute.
*iPad side switch settings link:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4085

HT5957 I completed the iOS 7.0.2 update and now my screen is locked in the Connect to iTunes position. I am not near my home computer so I cannot connect to iTunes. Please let me know if there is a way to recover this without connecting to a computer.

I completed the iOS 7.0.2 update and now my screen is locked in the Connect to iTunes position. I am not near my home computer so I cannot connect to iTunes. Please let me know if there is a way to recover this without connecting to a computer.

Use iTunes on any computer to restore your iPhone. Your data
will be gone, but your iPhone will be functioning. You can restore
when you get home.
You may wish to look into iCloud to prevent data loss in the future:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4436

Updates and locks-up

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for