Updation field in Scheduling Agreement

Hi All,
Could you please tell me how the fields (Cml. iss. qty,Cml.dlv.qty,CmlQtyReceived and CmlQtyInTransit ) are updated in the scheduling .
as per the below screen , since there is no open quantity for delivery creation.
Thanks
Radhika

Hi,
This field is not available for Scheduling Agreement. It is only available for Purchase Order.
Even you will not get this in Field selection also.

Similar Messages

Bapi to update miro considering schedule agreement also

hi experts,
Is any bapi to update miro considering schedule agreement also
Moderator message: please do more research before asking, show what you have done yourself when asking.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jul 8, 2011 10:48 AM

Hi,
Check BAPI_SAG_CHANGE function module.
KR Jaideep,

I- doc for creation/updation of Sales Scheduling Agreement

Hi,
Could anybody tell me details regarding the idoc details, for Sales Scheduling Agreement Creation & its updation.
Need the - Process code, Message type , Basic type & other details
Will the Idoc type be of DELORD. We will be getting the flatI file from the client for the creation of Scheduling Agreements
Appreciate the help
Thanks

For Automotive Suppliers, and SD scheduling agreement types 'LZ', etc.
Normally, the users create the SD Scheduling Agreement using VA31 first.
Then the Idocs, which are processed through IDOC_INPUT_DELINS_START, simply update the SA.
One SA may continue to be updated by EDI releases for many months.
On an 'LZ' type SA, there is a tab for Forecast Delivery schedules and a tab for JIT Delivery schedules.
At the simple level, which tab gets updated is controlled by the value in E1EDP10-SCREL.
For inbound 830 / DELFOR / VDA4905 transmissions, usually map SCREL = '03' which updates the Forecast Delivery Schedule.
For inbound 862 / DELJIT / VDA4915 transmissions, usually map SCREL = '02', which updates the JIT Delivery Schedule.
The search criteria in the search box you see on VA32 are similar to the key Idoc fields which are used to find the SA which needs to be updated.
Hopefully the users have access to transaction EMFOR to monitor the inbound Idocs and reprocess if necessary. (This is easier than workflow or WE02/BD87)
From EMFOR, Idocs in status 51 can often be processed in foreground. This is the quick way to figure out why you are getting a status 51. But I suspect it's because the SA was not created first.

Rounding quantity field in scheduling agreement not considered in JITK

Hello ALL,
I would like to consult to you a scenario I am facing when it comes to creating a scheduling agreement (VA31) and maintaining a Rounding Quantity (field ABLFZ) in it.
When using the standard LZ type scheduling agremeent, the Rounding quantity is considered when creating a delivery in VL10.
However, when using the LZJ type of scheduling agreement, the Rounding quantity is NOT considered when creating a delivery in JITK.
Can you please tell me what causes the case in LZJ scheduling agreement?
Thank you all in advance.

Hi,
This field is not available for Scheduling Agreement. It is only available for Purchase Order.
Even you will not get this in Field selection also.

Reg: "Reason for ordering" field in Scheduling Agreement.

Hi guys,
I am not getting the field "Reason for Ordering" in Scheduling Agreement.(ECC 6.0).
I am getting the same field in PO in "Retail" tab.
Any body can help me in this aspect.
Kannan

Hi,
This field is not available for Scheduling Agreement. It is only available for Purchase Order.
Even you will not get this in Field selection also.

MEKL - Update prices in Schedule Agreements

Hello,
Do you know a link to check the steps I need to folllow to excute that transaction?
I ran it, but does not do nothing....

Hi,
Try the following steps:
First of all, you have to create a Schedule Agreement with a material number, just for test.
Use Net value for this item = 1000
1 - Tcode MEKL
2 - Enter Purchase Organization
3 - Enter Vendor and, if you want, enter Schedule Agreement number you have just created
4 - Sched. Agreements w/o Materials and Test Run does not need to be selected for this test
5 - Enter Absolute Amount
6 - Sign = + That means system will get Actual Schedule Agreement Value (PB00) + Absolute Amount you have entered.
So, if you created a Schedule Agreement with one line 10 - Material xxxxx - Net Value 1000, and you entered Absolute Amount = 1000 and sign = + that means, system will change your Sechedule Agreement to 2000.
Sign = - if you want decrease value
7 - Gross Price should be selected
8 - Scale lines does not need be selected
9 - Supplementary conditions does not need be selected
10 - Condition valid on = today (the day you have created your Schedule Agreement)
11- Press F8 or run
System should give you a table result with your Schedule Agreement
If everything is ok, press Save Button
Now, go to ME33L and check new values.
I hope it helps you.
If you have any doubts, please, let me know.
Best Regards,
Natan
Edited by: Firenarrow on Jun 9, 2010 10:04 PM
Edited by: Firenarrow on Jun 9, 2010 10:06 PM

Vendormaster data changes not updated in MM scheduling agreement

Hi,
Can anbody tell me how to update the vendor master data changes for the exsting purchasing documents.

My dear friend ,
Solution 1:
In SAP ,it is not possible. Please shortclose the p.o.and create a new P.o to reflect the payment terms,
Solution 2:
Normally in all industries they will send a official letter stating the terms of payment has been amended. You will get the payment as agreed. While posting the MIRO change the payment terms and pay the vendor.
I think this the solution you have to choose any one no other go
G.Ganesh Kumar

Validity start and end fields in Scheduling agreement

Hi,
We are experiencing an issue where in for Transactions of ME31L, ME32L, ME33L for some users we the fields of Validity Start date (Header )and Validity End date (Header) is not appearing. These fields have been made Mandatory still for the users for which they don't appear they are able to save the Sch Agreement without inputting this information. Is this something to do with authorisation issue ?
Please help,
Thanks,
Sam

No I have already made the fields mandatory but the problem is only validity fields do not appear in ME31L, ME32L, ME33L for certain users and they do for others.
Sam

Update purchasing group in scheduling agreements

Hi gurus,
I'm trying to update purchasing group field in scheduling agreements, which are time-independent (EKKO-STAKO = ' ').
In my environment, I'm not authorized to use CALL TRANSACTION statement.
If possible, I'd need a way that works both in 4.6c and 6.0 versions.
I have tried several options, but none works:
-BAPI_SAG_CHANGE: "Scheduling agreements with time-independent conditions are not supported" (OSS note 1046794) (Also, this is not available in 4.6c)
-BAPI_SCHEDULE_MAINTAIN: "Scheduling agreements with time-independent conditions are not supported" (OSS note 1046794) (Also, this is not available in 4.6c)
-BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN: Does not have the possibility to change field 'purchasing group'. (Moreover, it internally performs a CALL TRANSACTION).
-ME_UPDATE_AGREEMENT_PO: I've been not able to change field 'purchasing group'.
I'd be grateful about any hint. Thanks in advance!

In case it is useful for anyone else, I have solved the problem using:
CALL FUNCTION 'ME_UPDATE_DOCUMENT'
Thanks anyway!

Problem Regarding TABLE updation for Scheduling Agreement

Dear Experts,
We have noticed that whenever we are releasing any Delivery Schedule for a line item against a Scheduling Agreement the table field ABART(Scheduling Agreement Release Type) in table EKET is not getting updated,but the same field or column in TABLE EKEH or EKEK is getting updated.
Please advice what is the problem and how to resolve the same.
Regards,
Soumick

Hi,
The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line ETENR), you should be able to find out....
transmitted quantity was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169, 117093, 134356).
Solution
First, the system behaves as intended.
It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
Regards,
Udaya.

Vendor address not updated in Scheduling Agreement

I have a peculiar problem where the vendor address is not being updated in all scheduling agreements. I have multiple SAs against a vendor. When i change the name of the vendor, the name changes only in one of the SA. All the remaining SA carry the old name of the vendor. I tested with another vendor on the test system and the names on all the agreements change as soon as I make the change in the vendor master.
Does anyone have any explanation on why the system is behaving strangely?
Thanks

Hi,
I am more surprised that the name changed automatically on the ones that DID change.
I would not have expected this to update in this way. The main idea is that outline agrements can have different data to the master records because they are specific agreements and often relate to very specific data.
If you wanted to change the address of a vendor it should NOT change the address of existinmg VSAs etc. automatically because the document is a =fixed contract that is agreed between you and the vendor and should ONLY be changed manually.
We had a similar question earlier today asking why the system does not change the short description on a contract when the short description on the material master changes. My reply was basically the same, it SHOULDN'T change it automatically because the agreement is a legal document and cannot be changed by just ONE of the parties involved.
So I would be asking why the one VSA changed automatically (and the ones in the test syste) not why the others didn't change.
Just trying to lok at this from all angles.
Steve B

How to insert the new field to standard scheduling agreement script form.

Hi Gurus,
how to insert the new fields to standad sheduling agreement script form. its a need for me, i want to display the AEDAT field in scheduling agreement form ,
The below one is my requirement,
ex:-   Itu2019s requested the change of Scheduling Agreement printout. Itu2019s requested for this type of   document, the insertion, into the field u201CData Emissionu201D into the print, of the document last modify date instead of the document creation date. (This change will be done only for position change into the Scheduling Agreement). No change into the PO.
Change SAPSCRIPT printout. Introduction, into the Scheduling Agreement, of last modified
      document date (field EKPO-AEDAT).
Thanks & Regards
chinnu

open TNAPR table and give the output type you need to modify.... get the print program name and check if some structure already have the date you wanted... if you have it already... then open the form in SE71 tr. and provide the strcuture name - feild in the position you want to have the date...
se71--->
&<str. name>-AEDAT&

Scheduling Agreement pricing condition PB00 value

Hi Experts.
Within pricing schema I do have pricing condition PB00 that is manually put in by the user. I have created a routine in order to calculate the PB00 value based on some logics and assign it to PB00 within the pricing schema.
So, if the custom logic are found, the price value should be change accordingly, if not the value put by the user will be kept.
The problem is that, at end of my routine the price is correctly calculated (let's say the user writes 2 and my routine calculates a price of 3) and the price is correctly updated on the scheduling agreement line field NETPR. But if i go inside the item to see the conditions I still see PB00 with the not-changed value.
Can anybody suggest? I am manipulating xkomv-kbetr and konp-kbetr.

Hi, Thanks for answering.
They are set so. But i need in any case to change the value of PB00 accordingly to my routine.The problem is that, at end of my routine the price is correctly calculated. PB00 value is 2 and it correctly recalculated by my routine to 5. on the SA item I see hte net price equal to 5, but if I go in the details I see condition PB00 still equal to 2.
Do you have any hints? thanks.

Capacity in scheduling agreement

Hi,
The documentation says we can assign transportation capacity and vendor capacity in scheduling agreements in ECC. Can you tell me which field in scheduling agreements are related to transportation capacity and vendor capacity?
I am new to scheduling agreements so please be a little elaborate.
Thanks.

Hi,
For all of your queries;
ME01 - Maintain Source List for the materials
Here maintain, Vendor, Plant, Purchase Org, most important input Scheduling Agreement No in Agreement column and in "MRP" column, use "2" i.e. Record relevant to MRP. Sched. lines generated automatically
Now run MRP and observe the result, it will consider Scheduling Agreement in MRP.

Mandatory creation profile on scheduling agreements

Hello Gurus,
I need to put a value on creation profile field on schedulling agreements. I have to choices:
- Put the value on supplier data. It is a plant-dependant value i my client doesn't want to create this data.
- Made it mandatory. This possibility doesn't appear through Scheduling Agreement -> Define Screen Layout at Document Level as usual in fields on Purchase docs.
Anyone has an idea how made it mandatory (or de badi to change the value by code)
Best regards,
Nacho

Dear Experts,
I'm not getting any response regarding Creation profile which I posted last week.
Can anybody explain me the use of Creation profile in Schedule line?
From Standard SAP help documentation I'm not convince.
Best Regards
PKB

Updation field in Scheduling Agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for