Upgrade - 3 way match relationship

I am on an upgrade project(erp 6), the question posed to me is: What is the best way to convert data to new system when there is a PO and a GR, but no IR at the moment ?
Previously this company did upgrades and for this scenario, left the items in legacy and waited for the IR, made payments and adjusted account balances in the new system.
The CFO does not want to do it that way this time. Does anyone have experience with best practice for a migration of this kind, with the key points of ensuring inventory and GRIR balances are correct.

Dear,
Which application areas belongs the intens PO, GR and IR ?
Then I will advice the responsible application team to check your question .
regards,
Lucio Rodrigues

Similar Messages

Upgrade - 3 way match conversion

I am on an upgrade project(erp 6), the question posed to me is: What is the best way to convert data to new system when there is a PO and a GR, but no IR at the moment ?
Previously this company did upgrades and for this scenario, left the items in legacy and waited for the IR, made payments and adjusted account balances in the new system.
The CFO does not want to do it that way this time. Does anyone have experience with best practice for a migration of this kind, with the key points of ensuring inventory and GRIR balances are correct.

Hi Joe,
Since as per your statement the PO and GR are already in.So Take all the FI G/L accounts also into the system and from a cutoff date you can start doing your LIV and Payments from the same system.
You need to have a cuttoff role.Where you can find the rediness from the finance side to move ahead on the system and you can take a snap shot of all the accounts that is the opening balance to the upper verison and start doing the payement from that.
Thanks

Upgrade - 3 way match data conversion

I am on an upgrade project(erp 6), the question posed to me is: What is the best way to convert data to new system when there is a PO and a GR, but no IR at the moment ?
Previously this company did upgrades and for this scenario, left the items in legacy and waited for the IR, made payments and adjusted account balances in the new system.
The CFO does not want to do it that way this time. Does anyone have experience with best practice for a migration of this kind, with the key points of ensuring inventory and GRIR balances are correct.

Dear,
Which application areas belongs the intens PO, GR and IR ?
Then I will advice the responsible application team to check your question .
regards,
Lucio Rodrigues

One way trust relationship between different domain windows server 2012 in different forest

I'd like to build trust correctly between the domains A.local and B.int. A.local is on a Windows 2012 . B.int is on a Windows 2012 . Both machines are
connected to the same LAN. The forest level in A.local
machine is Windows Server 2008 and The forest level in B.int
is Windows server 2012.
I want a one-way trust relationship, i.e. users from A.local gain access to B.local.
my problem it i create the trust put when i go to validate the trust between A.Local and B.int give me this error :
The secure channel (SC) reset on Active Directory Domain Controller \\dc2.B.int of domain B.int to domain A.Local failed with error: There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request.
NOTE : Recently I
UPGRADE THE Active Directory FROM 2008 R2 TO 2012 and i ping on A.local to B.int
it is ping by name and IP but from b.int ping by IP JUST >>>
ihab

Hi,
yes i already do it the setup conditional forwarding between the 2 domains and
the firewall it is off
ihab

GR/IR & Material GL accounts for 3 way match

Hi All Experts,
I have requirement where I have to configure the 3 way match scenario. For that I have to create material ( Stock) account, GR/IR account.
I have some doubts regarding this if I get experts guidance it will be great help for me.
Material Account
1 ) Material as a P & L OR Balance Sheet account ?
2 ) Reconciliation with material ? ( On control data tab in FS00 ! )
3 ) Line item ticked ? and Open Item ticked ?
4 ) Whether to define as cost element or not ?
GR/IR Account
1 ) GR/ IR account as a P & L OR Balance Sheet account ?
2 ) Reconciliation with material ? ( On control data tab in FS00 ! )
3 ) Line item ticked ? and Open Item ticked ?
4 ) Whether to define as cost element or not ?
and anything configuration point which I have missed can have guidance over that will be helpful.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Hi,
Material Account - Hope this is a stock A/c
1 ) Material as a P & L OR Balance Sheet account - B/S A/c
2 ) Reconciliation with material ? ( On control data tab in FS00 ! ) - No reconciliation type
3 ) Line item ticked ? and Open Item ticked ? - Only line item display
4 ) Whether to define as cost element or not ? - Not a cost element
GR/IR Account
1 ) GR/ IR account as a P & L OR Balance Sheet account ? - B/S
2 ) Reconciliation with material ? ( On control data tab in FS00 ! ) - No reconciliation type
3 ) Line item ticked ? and Open Item ticked ? - activate both
4 ) Whether to define as cost element or not ? - Not a cost element
You might need to check the config in OMR6.
Regards
SM

I wish to upgrade my Macbook Pro to ML from SL but told the only way to do this is by downloading thru App store. Is it possible to copy ML on a USB and upgrade that way. I would like to have a back up of the OS just in case i have a problem later. Help!

I wish to upgrade my Macbook Pro to ML from SL but told the only way to do this is by downloading thru App store. Is it possible to copy ML on to a USB and upgrade that way. I would like to have a back up of the OS installation files just in case i have a problem later. Please help me!

You can create an install disc but you would have to download Mountain Lion to do so..
How to create an OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion install drive | MacFixIt - CNET Reviews
And make sure your Mac can upgrade to Mountain Lion.
See Step 1, 2, and 3, here > Apple - Upgrade your Mac to OS X Mountain Lion.

2 Way Match - PO and Invoice (no goods receipt)

Dear Gurus,
We need to Implement the 2 Way Match process between the Invoice and the PO i.e. perform the Match once invoice has been recorded. The condition is invoice value should be less than $500. This means supplier will be paid irrespective of a goods receipt for a PO line. The goods receipt can happen later to close a PO line.
Please see below examples which will fall under this criteria.
PO # A
Line # 1 - Qty = 10 - PO unit Price = 100 - PO Total = 1000
Inv Qty = 4 - Inv line Total = 400 - Inv Grand total = 400
PO # B
Line # 1 - Qty = 5 - PO unit Price = 80 - PO Total = 400
Inv Qty = 5 - Inv line Total = 400 - Inv Grand total = 400
PO # 3
Line # 1 - Qty = 5 - PO unit Price = 100 - PO Total = 500
Line # 2 - Qty = 10 - PO unit Price = 10 - PO Total = 1000
PO total = 1500
Invoice Line # 1 - Inv Qty = 5 - Inv line Total = 400 - Inv Grand total = 400
Can these be achived by some setups?
Is there a way by which we can achieve this?
Thanks for your response in advance.

Hi Venkat,
Thanks for the swift response.
In fact we will be doing GR but at a later date. The object is to not held the vendor invoice and payment (esp. for small amt) just bcoz goods reception not done. Understand your concern that GR/IR might cause an issue.

Quantity variance in Invoice Vs. Three way match in PO

Hi Experts,
I am not able to find any differrence between quantity variance Vs. Three way match in PO.
For example in our purchase orders for all the items we are having Two way match (PO-Inv, GR-Bsd Inv is not checked) but we have defined quantity varaince in Invoice. So when we are trying to post invoice for purchase order item for which goods reciept is not performed, system is blocking the invoice due to quantity variance.
So i think if you have quantity variance at invoice level then system is going to check whether goods reciept is perfromed or not regardless of Two way or three way match.
Please advise if my understanding above is correct.
My second question is as we can define two way/three way match at various level (Supplier, Inforecord etc.). Is there anyway that i can define that quantity variance in Invoice should be for certain material groups only.
Please advise.
Regards,
Kamal

hi,
when you set the qty variance, and try to post the invoice just after the PO, the system will show a message at IR ie. " Quantity delivered is Zero"...
this message is warning message...
The system will block the invoice item when the doc is posted, depending on how the tolerance key DW is set(Qty variance to Gr qty = zero)...
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Three way matches

I need to check configuration setting to check if three way matches have been activated for
1) Vendor Order, Good Receipt and Payment to Vendor
2) Customer Order, Customer Invoice and Customer Payment
How do I do check this, what is the path.

Hi
For vendors check ME23n---Display PO
MIGO-- Goods receipt
MIRO--Invoice reciept
Regards
Aravind

Does SAP system provide 3 way matching report from PO up to payment in AP

Dear expert,
Would like to seek for your help to advise, does SAP system provide 3 way matching report from PO up to payment in AP with the following information?
Vendor Number
Vendor Name
AP Document Number
AP Document Date
Payment Document Number
Payment Document Date
Payment Amount
PO reference Number and Date
Item Description
Please help.
Regards,
KH

Hi Atif,
Thank you for the prompt reply, however I have a few question to seek for your advise as below:
a)I would like to know does SAP system have any standard report which have the information of 3 way matching report from PO up to payment in AP module?
b) I have find one report using T-code:FBl1N (vendor line item) is able to display the report with information of invoice,payment and there is one field purchasing document in the report however this field do not have any po number refer to the invoice.
I would like to know what the field purchasing document mean for (i.e what are the information capture on the column purchasing document)?
Please help.
Regards,
KH

Is it mandatory to perform PO receiving for a 2 way matching Invoices in 12.0.6?

Requirement :
Supplier would send everyday some files with respect to the quantity delivered..This delivery would be ad hc and without against any PO#...Invoicing needs to go via a PO.
Solution porposed :
a) Create a Inventory Org for that specific vendor
b) Create Misc receipts for the items sent based on the file received
c) Create a 2 way match PO
b) Create an Invoice and pay the vendor.
Let me know if you see any loopholes with this solution.
Thanks in advance!

2 way matching in any version is between Qty Ord and Qty Billd.

2 way match PO - without GR

Hi,
We are using 2 way match POs for Import scenarios, where Condition types/Material LIV is done first and later Goods receipt is carried out. GR/IR clearing a/c has been used to post offsetting entries.
Now, my client's requirement is to use a 2 way match PO without GR. That is, during LIV - system has to post - debit expense and credit vendor and there wont be a GR done for the same
I am not sure what kind of changes need to be done to achieve the same.
Kindly suggest
Regards,
Gangadhar

Only you have to do changes in remove check box PO item details delivery tab Goods receipt indicatior check.This will allow you 2 way match PO and invoice.

My itunes library has organically grown from more than one itunes account but all now on a separate computer. If I upgrade to iTunes match will I have to pay for each account?

My itunes library has organically grown from more than one itunes account (all paid for by me) but all now on a separate computer. If I upgrade to iTunes match will I have to pay for each account or just once, for the computer?

No. Provided the computer that you use to upload / match your Songs is authorised to play all of the Songs all works well - once complete you can download Song files that will play on your libraries / other computers without each computer having to be authorised.

Need SQL query for PO that do NOT have 3-way match.

The question is -- have any PO"s been generated with other then 3-way match selected - which means they overrode the set-ups in purchasing , to see if there are an PO that do NOT have 3-way match.
Thanks
Mohan.

1)Generally when ever we will do Supplier setup we will select in the Receiving tab Match approval level we will select either 3-way ,2-way,4-way or we will keep that as blank.
for that we do not have any direct column in the back end ,so we will use the following conditions.
'2WAY' inspection_required_flag = 'N'
receipt_required_flag = 'N'
'3WAY' inspection_required_flag = 'N'
receipt_required_flag = 'Y'
'4WAY' inspection_required_flag = 'Y'
receipt_required_flag = 'Y'
2)When ever we will create a PO in the shipments level what ever the Match approval level,
we defined in the supplier will automatically reflects in the shipments-More tab.
3)Here i wants to know all the PO's whihc are having Match approval level differences between supplier definiton and PO's match approval level.
(i.e If i will select a supplier for a PO , automatically we will get one Match approvallevel from supplier setup .if i will change that match approval level manually in the PO shipments -More tab i wants to know all that PO by using a SQL query.
4)But for some PO's i am getting receipt_required_flag and inspection_required_flag as null.But in the Supplier setup it may be one of the Matching approval.
Thanks
Mohan.

Implement 2-way matching for SRM PO

Hi Gurus,
We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic and currently running 3-way match scenarios. Client wants to implement 2-way match for certain Vendors. My question is how to accomplish this. Below are my thoughts. Please let me know if I missed any.
for 2 way match:
1. In ECC Maintain Vendor MAster - remove GR/IR indicator
2. In ECC Maintain Info records - remove GR/IR indicator
In SRM
1. use create Limit shop which defaults to 2 way (also gives option to select 3 way)
Please let me know if there are any config changes or new objects to be developed for 2-way match.
Thank you all
Rao

Hi Friends,
any suggestions is appreciated.
Thanks
Rao

Upgrade - 3 way match relationship

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for