Upgrade grdi infrastructure 11.2.0.1

Hello gurus.
I have Grid Infrastructure version 11.2.0.1 with ASM running on linux vm and 3 stand alone databases version 11.2.0.1.
I need to know if it's possible to upgrade both Grid Infrastructure and databases to version 11.2.0.3. I researched and did no find an answer.
Thanks,

Yes, but need to apply below patch before proceeding with GI upgrade
Patch 9413827: 11201 TO 11202 ASM ROLLING UPGRADE - OLD CRS STACK FAILS TO STOP
Please find step by step process from a blog.
http://startupforce.wordpress.com/2013/05/18/upgrading-gi-and-database-from-11-2-0-1-to-11-2-0-3/

Similar Messages

Upgrade Prime Infrastructure v1.2.1.012 to v1.3.0.20

Hi,
is there any patch for upgrade from v1.2.1.012 to v1.3.0.20?
Or I can install upgrade directly?
St.

But there is:
IMPORTANT: You MUST patch your existing system prior to using this upgrade installer. See appropriate patches under Prime Infrastructure Patches.
And in the table:
f your existing system is...
Download this point patch file
Cisco Prime Network Control System 1.1.0 (1.1.0.58)
ncs_patch-1.1.0.58-upgrade-12.tar.gz
Cisco Prime Network Control System 1.1.1 (1.1.1.24)
ncs_patch-1.1.1.24-upgrade-12.tar.gz
Prime Infrastructure 1.2 (PI 1.2.0.103)
pi_1.2.1.12_update.tar.gz
Last row doen't match current version (1.2.1.012)
St.

Upgrade Prime Infrastructure v1.2

Hello Support Community,
I want to upgarde my Prime Infrastructure which is in version 1.2 to a newer version (1.4 or 2.0) to be compatible with the version 7.5.102.0 of the contoller WLC.
Which version should I choose for the Prime infrastructure v1.4 or 2.0?
is there a cost for this upgrade?
I found some documentation on this topic but I need your help to clarify this point.
Thanks in advance for your response.
Best regards

Yes.... PI 1.2 was not great and upgrading has caused many issues.... you can search the forum on that. I always stand up a new VM and just export and import the floor maps and rehost the license. The matrix shows you what WLC code that PI supports and what AP's PI supports. You need to understand that as you might choose either PI 1.4.1 or PI 2.0. PI 2.0 was built around converged access so since you have a Unified WLC, you should go with PI 1.4 and patch that to PI 1.4.1.
Thanks,
Scott
*****Help out other by using the rating system and marking answered questions as "Answered"*****

Upgrading prime infrastructure 2.1.0.0.78 - 2.1 cannot do app backup

Hi All
Trying to do an upgrade prime 2.1.0.0.78 to prime 2.2.
I have saved an app backup off the exisitng prime 2.1.0.0.78
However when i try to restore to the new prime infra 2.2
with the backup from the 2.1.0.0.78 it fails with a database error
My technical support say i should change the new vm server
to match ip addresses etc with the old one but that cant be right
as this is the official blurb for the types of backups ...
Application backups: These contain all Prime Infrastructure application data, but do not include host-specific settings, such as the server hostname and IP address. Application backups are intended for use when Prime Infrastructure is running as an OVA on customer-supplied hardware, as restoring from the backup may need to be to a server with completely different host settings.
Appliance backups: These contain all application data and host-specific settings, including the hostname, IP address, subnet mask, and default gateway. Appliance backups are intended for use when Prime Infrastructure is running on a Cisco-supplied appliance, and restoration is most likely to be to a server with the same host settings.
I am obviously using the application backups
Kind regards
Steve

Here you go ....
Initiating restore. Please wait...
Restore Started at 02/02/15 17:29:54
Stage 1 of 9: Transferring backup file ...
-- completed at 02/02/15 17:30:59
Stage 2 of 9: Decrypting backup file ...
-- completed at 02/02/15 17:34:00
Stage 3 of 9: Unpacking backup file ...
-- completed at 02/02/15 17:34:01
Stopping strongSwan IPsec failed: starter is not running
Stage 4 of 9: Decompressing backup ...
-- completed at 02/02/15 17:34:31
Stage 5 of 9: Restoring Support Files ...
-- completed at 02/02/15 17:34:32
Stage 6 of 9: Restoring Database Files ...
-- completed at 02/02/15 17:34:51
Stage 7 of 9: Recovering Database ...
Error while restoring and recovering database, please check the logs.

Upgradding Prime Infrastructure version 1.2 and LMS 4.x to Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0

Hello,
A customer currently have 2,500 Cisco Prime Infrastructure Lifecycle device license using Prime Infrastructure version 1.2 and LMS 4.x. the customer wants to upgrade to Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0.
Does anyone know if it is possible to upgrade to version 2.0 without additional cost? the licenses from
Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.2 has to be upgraded or we need only to rehost the VUDI.
Also could be possible to upgrade LMS 4.x to Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0?
thanks!

The two features you mention are two big missing ones. Another is full syslog capability. I don't believe CiscoView or day one support via package updates is included either.
Another is less tangible - the depth of experience and documentation available for LMS vs. Prime Infrastructure (particularly the wired management features). I agree for wireless PI 2.0 looks good. Some new features are coming for wired that look promising but they are new as of PI 2.0 so I'm taking a wait and see on them.
I hope to get 2.0 up in my lab in the next week or so and will hope to be pleasantly surprised but that's seldom the case with a major new release.

9.0.4 OID Upgrade Assistant - Infrastructure install ora-00911

Hi,
upgrading from 9.0.2 to 9.0.4 on windows server.
Configuration assistant failed on Internet Directory Upgrade Assistant
output:
Non-SSL port:4032
4031
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00911:invalid character
My upgrade is sitting here going nowhere and my searches have not yielded an answer - any assistance would be very much appreciated
Thx, Pat

Hi Mojo,
There is no direct upgrade path fro 9.0.4 to 11g as you have OID involved so that latest being 11.1.1.7.0.
In order to upgrade Oracle Application Server to 11g the first step is to upgrade the 9.0.4 to 10.1.2.3 which is a manadatory prerequisite.
So in-order to get Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 you need to create an SR with Shipment team as 10.1.2.0.2 is de-supported since Jan 1st 2012 and the download the path "5983622" to upgrade
10.1.2.0.2 to 10.1.2.3.Once the upgrade is successfull then you need to proceed to to 11g upgrade.
Also there are some limitations of using Application Server 10.1.2.3 on DB 11gR2 for which please review the note:887365.1 "Oracle Database 11g Release 2 (11.2) Certification for Oracle Application Server 10g (10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4)"
Regards,
Prakash.

Upgrade Ironport C170 to version 8.0.1-023

Hi, my environment has 01 C170 box with the version 7.5.1-102 and I bought 01 C380 to upgrade the infrastructure.
My question is, in order to I get the successful upgrade I have to upgrade the version from C170 to the same C380.
The C380 came with the release 8.0.1-023.
My question is: Does The C170 support upgrade till this version? How many upgrades I have to do to reach the version 8.0.1-023?
How is the best way to make a cluster with these 02 boxes?
Thank you.

Yes - the C170 can upgrade to 8.0.1-023. Upgrade path would be:
phoebe-7-5-1-102 --> phoebe-7-6-1-022 --> phoebe-8-0-1-023
The best way to cluster... the C380 should have the 'clusterconfig' command active, and you can request the license from our Global Licensing Operations for the C170, they should be able to provide a temp license, or full license...
Please contact our Global Licensing Operations team:
https://tools.cisco.com/SWIFT/LicensingUI/Home
Licensing FAQ
Phone: 1-800-553-2447, opt 3 (You may request to have a case opened for GLO/Licensing.)
Their email directly is: [email protected]
I hope this helps!
-Robert
(*If you have received the answer to your original question, and found this helpful/correct - please mark the question as answered, and be sure to leave a rating to reflect!)

Upgrade from 10.1.2.0.2 to 10.1.4.0.1 issues

I recently upgraded our Infrastructure and Metadata Repository from 10.1.2.0.2 to 10.1.4.0.1. After the upgrade, everything seemed to be working properly including our mid-tier server which was SSL and SSO enabled. When viewing the EM Application Server Control, everything appears to be up and running including the HTTP_Server, DAS, DIP, LDAP, OC4J_SECURITY and Management containers. However, the Single Sign-On:orasso container is down. I am still able to get to /pls/orasso and /oiddas and logon using SSO, and I can still login to my applications using SSO. What is the deal with this container?
Also, when I click on the Administration link for HTTP_Server and then look at the PL/SQL Properties, there are no DADs listed at all? Is there a new way of doing these in the 10.1.4 version? I would think I should at least see the /pls/orasso DAD listed.
Also, when on the home page of the Application Server Control, the version is displayed as:
Version 10.1.2.0.2
However, the Oracle Home is displayed as:
Oracle Home d:\oracle\orahome2
which is our new 10.1.4 installation.
I also ran the following query as suggested in the "Quick Upgrade Guide"
SELECT comp_id,version,status FROM APP_REGISTRY;
COMP_ID          VERSION          STATUS
WORKFLOW     10.1.2.0.0          VALID
SYNDICATION     10.1.2.0.0          VALID
SSO               10.1.4.0.1          VALID
B2B               10.1.2.0.0          VALID
MRC               10.1.2.0.0          VALID
OCA               10.1.2.0.0          VALID
OID               10.1.4.0.1          VALID
DCM               10.1.2.0.0          VALID
DISCOVERER     10.1.2.0.0          VALID
WCS               10.1.2.0.0          VALID
UDDI               10.1.2.0.0          VALID
PORTAL          10.1.2.2.0          VALID
WIRELESS          10.1.2.1.0          VALID

Sorry I don't know but you could try posting under Grid Computing, Clusterware instead of Database - General

Best Practices for Upgrade UCS firmware from 2.0 to 2.2?

Hi
I have Cisco UCS system ( 2 FI, 4 Chassis with 32 Server ) running 2.0 firmware. Now I want upgrade to 2.2. When I check document "Upgrading Cisco UCS from Release 2.0 to Release 2.2", I see have 2 solution:
- 1. Upgrading from Release 2.0 with Auto Install -> Step simple but all server reboot at same time.
- 2. Manually Upgrading from Release 2.0. -> Step more complex but can upgrade server one by one.
My question:
- Can I "Upgrade the infrastructure firmware with Auto Intall but upgrade Server with Manual"?
- What is best for my case?
Thanks

Hi Phamcongtuan,
In UCS you can create host firmware policy that can be used to upgrade the firmware of your blades. Once you upgrade the infrastructure firmware, you can apply the host firmware policy to the service profiles of your blades. If you are using service profiles templates you will need to unbind the service profiles and apply the policy to the individual servers.
Host Firmware Package
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/firmware-mgmt/cli/2-2/b_CLI_Firmware_Management_22/b_CLI_Firmware_Management_22_chapter_01000.html#concept_6982A188474A452CBFDBBDD7DD4921F3

Prime infrastructure nexus 5600 unknown device ?

Hi All
Just upgraded prime infrastructure to ver 2.2 but we have a few issues
One of them is it sees our Nexus 6572 s as unknown devices .
While trying to deal with another issue with our support we upgraded
all the newest patches but still this come up as an unknown device.
Surely cisco have a device patch or something for this
As i have learnt prime from using it and havent done any training
perhaps there is something i should know
Kind regards
Steve

Ignore this one just uploaded the latest device patch and this now works
Steve

Upgrade 11.2 to 11.2.0.2 out of place

Hi
Im trying to upgrade from 11.2.0.1.0 to 11.2.0.2 is the following bug fix needed ? Im not doing the in place upgrade.. Im doing out of place upgrade?
– Patch the release 11.2.0.1 Oracle Grid Infrastructure home with the 9413827 and 9706490 patches."
Bug 10036834 Linux Platforms: Patches not found upgrading Grid Infrastructure from 11.2.0.1 to 11.2.0.2

Hi,
To clarify:
To upgrade existing 11.2.0.1 Oracle Grid Infrastructure installations to Oracle Grid Infrastructure 11.2.0.2, you must first do at least one of the following:
* Patch the release 11.2.0.1 Oracle Grid Infrastructure home with the 9413827 and 9706490 patches.
* Install Oracle Grid Infrastructure Patch Set 1 (GI PSU1) or Oracle Grid Infrastructure Patch Set 2 (GI PSU2).
Oracle Clusterware and Oracle ASM upgrades are always out-of-place upgrades. With 11g release 2 (11.2), you cannot perform an in-place upgrade of Oracle Clusterware and Oracle ASM to existing homes.source: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e17212/procstop.htm#BABEIBEE
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Jozsef

After upgraded to MPLS backbone -- urgent !!!!!!!!

After my ISP upgrade their backbone to MPLS we have a internet brower issue wide across my LAN. Some PCs can not brower internet, but some PCs in the same segment can!!!
I do a NAM trace found a HTTP error
" IP packet size limited during capture: HTTP truncated".
Later we tried decrease local pc MTU to 500 it works, they can brower the site which do not open previouly. But still the problems is some PCs local MTU setting is 1300 is working fine ???!!
I really confused?? Is it a MPLS issue or it is my local router setting? Since I have not make any change on my site recently?
Need your help.
Thanks

When there are MTU issues, the reason why some machines will have access and not others are severals.
- The OS version: newer OSes have the tcp pmtu discovery on by default
- The best way to do a test for MTU issues is with pings and the DF bit set up (with the -f in Windows or "-M do" in *nix)
You can use the "ip tcp adjust-mss " but me, as a customer, would not accept it.
There are numerous discussions and examples on why not to accept MTU < 1500 for an enterprise. Most people can live with micro MTUs and most of us do (i.e. in our broadband connections).
Each time you have to encapsulate your traffic (i.e. MPLS, GRE, IPSec, L2TP) you will be forced to reduce the effective MTU. Now, if you, as an enterprise, have an MTU < 1500, you will start subtracting from it and the smaller the MTU the grater the overhead in bulk transfers. It is quite complicated to explain, but you will be experiencing and effective bandwidth loss for your bulk transmissions. (See NANOG discussions in this issue as well as numerous reports in ACM/IEEE Transaction of Networking)
Finally, since not all third party devices support the MSS adjustment, the carrier will be forcing some customer to upgrade their infrastructure. Not everyone will have the means to upgrade their infrastructure because the carrier decides to change something.
Hope this give you some ideas.
-W

Portal down after upgrade from 10.1.2.2 to 10.1.2.3

Hi Folks,
The weekend we upgraded the infrastructure/mid-tier from 10.1.2.2 to 10.1.2.3 and did the same for the metadata repository. We noticed since then portal is down though OC4J_Portal is up. Any idea how the upgrade would cause this and how to fix it?
Thanks
Troy

Hi Erik,
I checked the metalink note you recommended and sure enough my PortalListeniongHostPort and HTTPPort did not match. I changed them and added the root certificate in b64InternetCertificate.txt and it now shows as up. Thank you so much for referring me to that document. It is greatly appreciated.
Troy

Updated Distribution service infrastructure

Yesterday at 3:20PM PDT we flipped the switch to enable our new configuration for the distribution service. This effort involved several months of scoping, testing and rehearsing to ensure a smooth transition and the establishment of an environment that we believe will provide a significant performance boost for publishing and fulfilling content to consumers.
A grand total of 18 packets were lost in the transition and we have already heard of significantly faster publishing efforts. Folios that used to take over an hour to publish are now finishing in under 10 minutes. We are now feeding data to Akamai at 10x the speed we could in the past. This means that fewer users should be seeing timeout issues in their libarary and increased reliability of background downloads via iOS Newsstand, when publishers push new content live.
Adobe is firmly committed to the business of digital publishing and our primary goal is increasing customer satisfaction with DPS. Yesterday's rollout was the first of several high priority efforts under way to increase the horsepower that drives the internal machinery of DPS.
Please let me know if you encounter any stability issues and expect more great improvements in the upcoming months.

real great stuff and well done.
we are publishing daily issues, in the wortst case it took more than 30 minutes to put a publication with 40 articles online (portrait & landscape). the average duration was around 18 minutes 30 seconds and today we
completed the publication process in incredible 4 minutes and 27 seconds.
kudos to everyone envolved in upgrading the infrastructure.
kind regards & fingers crossed to keep the excelent performance
Michael

Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.2: Catalyst 2960X-24TS-LL Switch Collection Failure

Hello,
I've Upgraded Prime Infrastructure to Version 2.2.0.0.158. Now our Catalyst 2960X-24TS-LL switches show an error message, when they are added to the inventory. The error is as follows:
Partial Collection Failure; Collection Status : Failed feature(s).
The 2960X-24TS-LL is listed under the supported devices list and other switches (e.g. WS-C2960X-48FPS-L) got inventorized without any problems.
Did anybody see this issue and can tell me how to solve it.
- Benjamin

- Getting that one too, since running 2.2 (Failed Features) ; suggest opening a TAC case.
M.

Upgrade grdi infrastructure 11.2.0.1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for