Upgrade Issue - Status MVA0

Hi All,
I had met this error:Status MVA0 of the user interface SAPLCSDI missing at when I run CS01/ CS02. And I also met the error:Status MAA0 of the user interface SAPLCSDI when I run CS03.
Do anyone can share the experience to solve this error ?
Thanks a lot.

have you searched service.sap.com for notes on that topic? i had a quick peek for 'SAPLCSDI Status' and got 40 hits some of which sound promising.

Similar Messages

EHP Upgrade Issue - Java Stack

Hi,
Our Source System at NW 7.0 SP13 and we are upgrading the system to EHP1 SP03.
Upgrade failed at Downtime > DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL phase.
Error log:
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:                       com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.doExecute(AbstractPhaseType.java:863) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Exception has occurred during the execution of the phase.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:             com.sap.sdt.jspm.unattended.RequestController.addContextInfo(RequestController.java:178) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Deployment of queue sapjup-queue completed with error
JSPM version is 7.01.3.0.15. Current JSPM log directory is /usr/sap/XPD/JC00/j2ee/JSPM/log/log_2009_09_09_16_09_42.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.createAndLogRapiException(SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.java:698) [Thread[main,5,main]]: The deployment of the queue failed.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.deploy.SAPJupJSPMDeployer.deployList(SAPJupJSPMDeployer.java:68) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Could not execute deployment of stack file /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in/XPD.xml.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:      com.sap.sdt.j2ee.phases.PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.execute(PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.java:519) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Error while executing DeploymentManager phase with action deploySlot. Check the log files for the specified action.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:906) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase UPGRADE/DEPLOYMENT_BASED_UPGRADE/DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL has been completed.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:907) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Start time: 2009/09/09 22:09:42.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:909) [Thread[main,5,main]]: End time: 2009/09/09 22:11:51.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:910) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Duration: 0:02:08.248.
Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:911) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase status is error.
I went through the following link , proceeded with option 2, But still getting same error.
Portal Upgrade Issue
Please advise the resolution for the issue I have.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Srinivas
Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM
Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM

Issue resolved

Upgrade issues OBIEE 10g to 11g along with OBIA upgrade

Hi,
I have to upgrade OBIEE 10.1.3.4.1 to OBIEE 11.1.1.5 along with OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5(Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1) at my client location and I have very little knowledge on it. and want to know/have help documents for upgrade.
And if anyone in the forums involved in upgrade please list the errors/issues occured during upgrade and after upgrade.
1. OBIEE 10g to 11g upgrade issues??
2. OBIA OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5 upgrade issues along with 10g to 11g??
3. Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1 upgrade issues??
4. DAC upgrade issues??
any response for my questions is appreciated.
Thanks
Jay.
Edited by: Jay on Apr 11, 2012 9:11 AM

HI Jay,
We cannot explained thread list here, If you get any errors plz post me,will try to help out.
This is oracle document link - This document has given step by step with screen shots upgration for 10g to 11g ,Please refer the below link.
http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/bi/bi11115/upgrade/upgrade_to_11g.htm
http://obieemanu.blogspot.in/2011/05/rpd-upgration-from-10g-to-11g.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/upgrade.1111/e10125/ua_command_line.htm#ASMAS149
Award points it is useful.
Thanks,
satya

Report generation toolkit upgrade issues

I have created multiple vi's in that utilize the previous report generation toolkits specifically using the Generate Report Get Data to Modify.vi and the Generate Report Set Modified Data.vi. Obviously the report reference has now changed in 8.6's version of the report generation toolkit and these vi's do not exist in the 8.6 library anymore. What vi's do I need to replace these functions with to make this code work. Can anyone tell me what the work around is to solving this problem. This is a picture of the code.
BJD1613
Lead Test Tools Development Engineer
Philips Respironics
Certified LV Architect / Instructor
Attachments:
code.JPG ‏92 KB

Hi BJD1613,
The Report Generation VIs on the LabVIEW Palettes mutate properly. However, you may run into upgrade issues if VIs distributed with LabVIEW, but not available in the Palettes are used in the code. Hence, I would caution against using them for the same reason.
In this case, the specific references do exist in the report generation classes; however, since they are private, they cannot be accessed by VIs outside the respective classes. A temporary workaround for now is mentioned in the following KB 4OOCSJ4M Getting References in Report Generation Toolkit 1.1.3 with LabVIEW 8.6.
This was reported to R&D (CAR# 123064) for further investigation

Enhance GRC issue status report columns

Hello GRC Gurus
I am new to GRC application and I have a requirement to enhance u201CIssue Statusu201D report fields.
Process:
Goto -> Report Center - > "Issue status" Report -> run based on the condition. It will display ll the issue report in a ALV table formate with the columns
Organization Subprocess Control Issue Ectu2026(As configured in SPRO)
But my requirement is to add a Custom additional Field to the ALV table report:
Is there any enhancement to add the custom field in to the report and implement logic to populate data to the same?
Kindly let me know your comments.
Thanks you ,
Regards,
Magesh
Edited by: mageshB on Dec 28, 2010 6:10 AM

Yes, of course.
Kindly look into the view cluster:
VC_GRFNREPCOLUMNSC - Reporting: Customizing of report columns
VC_GRFNREPCUST - Report: Customizing

Upgrade issues list needed

Hi,
We're currently on 4.6b and going to upgrade to ECC6 with unicode I'm trying to compile a list point taken care converting to unicode from ABAP technical point of view. Does anyone have such a list?
Some points i shortlisted are :
1) Use GUI_UPLOAD and GUI_DOWNLOAD rather than WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD.
2) Structures or table headers that contain non-character data need to be identical when moving, comparing, selecting into, updating from, etc.
3) OPEN DATASET filename IN TEXT MODE FOR INPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
I know there are others. Any help would be appreciated.
aRs

Check the below links
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=268386&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=263434&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=261051&highlight=upgrade+issues
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=253316&highlight=upgrade+issues

Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue

hello ,
We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
these errors in 3L!
After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
application hanging.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
thanks
suma
Here is an Excerpt of the log file
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
regards,
Suma Venkatesh

-----Original Message-----
From: Venkatesh, Suma
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:39 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue
hello ,
We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
these errors in 3L!
After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
application hanging.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
thanks
suma
Here is an Excerpt of the log file
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
find
out why.
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Error #: [501, 152]
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
(partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
[F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
"MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
laxrc2.
INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
regards,
Suma Venkatesh

R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login using forms:Please help****urgent

We have recently upgraded our instance from 11.5.9 to 12.0.4 in Windows 2003 server.
We are unable to login to forms after upgrade, however we are able access self service responsibilities without any issues.
We are getting APP-FND-01496 when we access any forms responsibility. We have tried all possible metalink notes with no luck.
Any help to resolve this issue will be appreciated.

Duplicate thread ...
R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help
Re: R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help

ECC 6.0 EHP-4 upgrade Issue in phase MAIN SHDRUN/ALTNTAB FILL were negative

Hi Basis Expert,
while doing ECC 6.0 EHP-4 Upgrade in MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL phase we are getting the following issue please help us.
Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL were negative!
Last error code set: BATCH JOB RDDNT2MT FAILED: Error(s) found in the log(s), accumulated in "ALTNTFI.ELG".
We check the shadow instance is up and we can log in to the system. Check ST22 and SM21 notice no error.
Check the JOB RDDNT2MT (SM37) successfully running and all the job finish without any error.
Hope anybody can share a bit your experience on this issue. we try search the note and find the forum but no luck.
Thanks

Hi,
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""(environment parameter)""auth_shadow_upgrade"
> 2EETG011 "No shadow system""DB-connect not against shadow tables !"
>
It looks from your log that shadow system is not able to connect to database. Please check your shadow system. Check below link as well:
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/ecc-6-upgrade-issue-in-phase-altntab_fill-1556272
Thanks
Sunny
Edited by: Sunny Pahuja on Oct 15, 2010 1:27 PM

Upgrade issues list

Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone had a list of Upgrade issues (most likely, from ticketting system) to the 5.0 system.
Thanks

Hi mark,
Can u please send me the upgrade issue list to this email address
[email protected]

IDSM-2 - upgrade issue - 5.x to 6.x

Hello All,
I have an issue upgrading the IDSM-2 module I'm playing with.
It is currently running version 5.0(2).
The thing is when I try to upgrade the image to the latest 6.x version using the .bin.gz file, I get the follwing error message :
The filename IPS-IDSM2-K9-sys-1.1-a-6.1-2-E3.bin.gz is not a valid upgrade file type.
Continue with upgrade? []:
There is no image file that is not .bin.gz on the download section of the website. Only recovery images have the .pkg extension.
Does anybody how to troubleshoot this simple(I guess) upgrade issue?
Regards,
Thibault.

You are trying to "upgrade" using a "System Image" (-sys-) file instead of an Upgrade file.
The upgrade file for the IDSM-2 is the standard upgrade file used across almost all IPS/IDS models:
IPS-K9-6.1-2-E3.pkg
It can be downloaded here:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ips6

Need a Badi to look the good issue status for prod order before good receipt in MIGO

Hi ,
Need a Badi to look the good issue status for compoents for prod order before good receipt in MIGO.
Example : There are 10 comps need to be issued to production order to make any assy but 6 comps were issued
and remaining 4 comps are not yet issued.,in this situation if I try to do goods receipt for prod order through MIGO.,system should populate the warning
message saying still goods issue are pending for prod order.
Please advise .
Thanks
Prasad

Hi Prasad,
Before trying with a BAdI, have you tried to control this behaviour thru the Order confirmation parameters (OPK4)?
Note that you can have a termination in case of having problems in the goods movements..
Take a look of this and the SAP help:
Termination of Confirmation if Incorrect Goods Movements
Controls if the confirmation is terminated in the event of incorrect goods
movements.
Use
This enables you to terminate the confirmation in the event of incorrect
items, for example, to prevent postprocessing records.
Dependencies
The indicator is only evaluated if either no process control key or one
process control key has been stored that enbles the goods movements to be posted
in dialog AND for which the "provide error handling for goods movements"
indicator is active. If there are incorrect goods movements, the system behaves
as follows:
A log is issued that gives information on the incorrect goods movements
If these incorrect goods movements are determined by inventory management,
then the option of correcting these errors is offered in the error handling
If the correction is not successful, the confirmation is terminated
Kind Regards,
Mariano

Frustrating Phone Upgrade issue

We need help with phone upgrade issue we encounter when BestBuy associate process our upgrade. Associate is saying we are not eligible but we have not done any phone upgrade since Jan 2011. Our ATT mobile service was established with BB in 2009 and we only upgraded 2 phones in Jan 2011 thru BB. The only recent change in January 2013 was a change of responsibility between my spouse and me since my company has a better employer discount thru ATT. No change and per ATT, no contract and we should be able to upgrade in any retail store. But BB keeps telling us we have issue with ATT and can do our upgrade only with ATT Corporate Store. Our mobile account is a regular family plan account as originally established with BB and just like any BB customer, have employer's discount attached. I don't understand how BB system communicates with ATT system so it is hard for me to explain to ATT what "error message" BB associate is receiving. It has become so frustrating with BestBuy telling us to check with ATT and then for ATT to tell us that there is no issue at their end. We have been a loyal BB customer with all major appliances bought from them including protection plan. The least they can do is work with their ATT representative to figure out between themselves what the issue is. Here we are willing to give both companies our business with new phones and new contracts and no one can help us out.

LTGee -
I am very sorry to hear about this. I am going to send you a Private Message to collect some information from you to see if we can get to the bottom of this. To check your private messages, ensure you are logged into the forum and click on the envelope on the upper right hand side of the forum.
Thanks!
Jesus|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

SharePoint 2013 Upgrade Issue

We are running a small farm with one app server and wfe server and sql server and in the process of upgrading SharePoint servers from RTM version 15.0.4420.1017 to SP1. However, app server shows the status of "upgrade required" in Servers in
Farm in CA. When I run stsadm.exe -o localupgradestatus, the output results on app server are:
38] content database(s) encountered.
[0] content database(s) still need upgrade or cannot be upgraded.
[56] site collection(s) are contained in the content databases.
[0] site collection(s) still need upgrade.
[49] other objects encountered, [1] of them still need upgrade or cannot be upgraded.
Also, logs on app server after running psconfig are
PSCONFIG.EXE -cmd upgrade -inplace b2b -force -cmd applicationcontent -install -cmd installfeatures
Timestamp
Process
TID Area
Category
EventID Level
Message Correlation
01/14/2015 11:27:07.81 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
INFO SPWebApplication Name=SharePoint - name of the URL
.... 10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:27:07.81 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
ERROR CanUpgrade [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebSite] failed.
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:27:07.85 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
INFO SPWebApplication Name=SharePoint - name of the URL....
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:27:07.85 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
ERROR Exception: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:27:07.88 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
INFO SPWebApplication Name=SharePoint - name of the URL....
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:27:07.88 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
ERROR at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPWebApplication.SetVersionOnIisWebSite(String binaryVersion, String buildVersion, DirectoryInfo di) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPSequence.get_CanUpgrade()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.CanUpgrade(Object o)
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:27:07.90 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxnf
INFO SPWebApplication Name=SharePoint - name of the URL....
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:27:07.90 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxnf
ERROR Cannot upgrade [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebSite].
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:28:06.25 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
INFO No context object
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:28:06.25 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
ERROR CanUpgrade [Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPIisWebSite] failed.
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:28:06.28 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
INFO No context object
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:28:06.28 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
ERROR Exception: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:28:06.34 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
INFO No context object
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:28:06.34 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession ajxme
ERROR at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPWebApplication.SetVersionOnIisWebSite(String binaryVersion, String buildVersion, DirectoryInfo di) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPSequence.get_CanUpgrade()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.CanUpgrade(Object o)
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:28:06.43 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession aj0ur
INFO No context object
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
01/14/2015 11:28:06.43 OWSTIMER (0x2C94)
0x1764 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade
SPUpgradeSession aj0ur
ERROR Upgrade Timer job is exiting due to exception: Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeException: Upgrade completed with errors. Review the upgrade log file located in C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft
Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\LOGS\Upgrade-20150114-112257-939.log. The number of errors and warnings is listed at the end of the upgrade log file. at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.CheckPoint() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeSession.LogEnd()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPUpgradeJobDefinition.Execute(Guid targetInstanceId)
10b7df9c-5c81-a0c7-dd9d-a7c4dd5a14e7
I checked event logs and ULS logs but find nothing which can help fix this issue ?

Hi Sharma,
According to your description, my understanding is that the app server shows "upgrade required" when you upgrade your SharePoint 2013 from RTM to SP1.
Whether you upgrade your SharePoint on app server from RTM to SP1.
If not, please install SP1 for your SharePoint on the app server.
After installing SP1, you need to run SharePoint Product Configuration Wizard.
Best Regards,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

EBS 12.1.3 Upgrade issue

Hi,
I installed 12.1.1 with the Vision Database on my machines which has a 64 bit Linux 5 update 5 operating system and everything went fine. After that I decided to upgrade to 12.1.3. I installed the following patches in order they are given below :
1) R12.AD.B.DELTA.3 Patch 9239089
2) Patch 9239090
3) Patch 9239095
4) 9817770:R12.ATG_PF.B POST-R12.ATG_PF.B.DELTA.3CONSOLIDATED PATCH
5) 9966055:R12.FND.B [TRANSLATED VERSION OF FNDSCSGN NOT LAUNCHED
The only issues I had was during the compilation of one form library I got an error in Patch 923090 and I said to continue. The patches completed successfully (I think) since I can log into applications. My issue is I have a lot of invalid objects. I tried to manually compile them but failed then followed one of the other threads to run utlrp.sql and utlirp.sql scripts as per (R12.1.1 - Invalid Objects After Patching [ID 1093163.1])
I have followed that document and tried to run but my invalid count stays the same. Here is the snapshot when I query the database :
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*), OWNER FROM DBA_OBJECTS WHERE STATUS='INVALID'
2 GROUP BY OWNER;
COUNT(*) OWNER
1 RE
2 CA
4 PUBLIC
1 HERMAN
228 APPS
2 FLOWS_010500
SQL> @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/utlrp.sql
TIMESTAMP
COMP_TIMESTAMP UTLRP_BGN 2012-04-05 07:23:05
DOC> The following PL/SQL block invokes UTL_RECOMP to recompile invalid
DOC> objects in the database. Recompilation time is proportional to the
DOC> number of invalid objects in the database, so this command may take
DOC> a long time to execute on a database with a large number of invalid
DOC> objects.
DOC>
DOC> Use the following queries to track recompilation progress:
DOC>
DOC> 1. Query returning the number of invalid objects remaining. This
DOC> number should decrease with time.
DOC> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM obj$ WHERE status IN (4, 5, 6);
DOC>
DOC> 2. Query returning the number of objects compiled so far. This number
DOC> should increase with time.
DOC> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM UTL_RECOMP_COMPILED;
DOC>
DOC> This script automatically chooses serial or parallel recompilation
DOC> based on the number of CPUs available (parameter cpu_count) multiplied
DOC> by the number of threads per CPU (parameter parallel_threads_per_cpu).
DOC> On RAC, this number is added across all RAC nodes.
DOC>
DOC> UTL_RECOMP uses DBMS_SCHEDULER to create jobs for parallel
DOC> recompilation. Jobs are created without instance affinity so that they
DOC> can migrate across RAC nodes. Use the following queries to verify
DOC> whether UTL_RECOMP jobs are being created and run correctly:
DOC>
DOC> 1. Query showing jobs created by UTL_RECOMP
DOC> SELECT job_name FROM dba_scheduler_jobs
DOC> WHERE job_name like 'UTL_RECOMP_SLAVE_%';
DOC>
DOC> 2. Query showing UTL_RECOMP jobs that are running
DOC> SELECT job_name FROM dba_scheduler_running_jobs
DOC> WHERE job_name like 'UTL_RECOMP_SLAVE_%';
DOC>#
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
TIMESTAMP
COMP_TIMESTAMP UTLRP_END 2012-04-05 07:24:29
DECLARE
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "FALSE": invalid identifier
ORA-06512: at line 13
DOC> The following query reports the number of objects that have compiled
DOC> with errors (objects that compile with errors have status set to 3 in
DOC> obj$). If the number is higher than expected, please examine the error
DOC> messages reported with each object (using SHOW ERRORS) to see if they
DOC> point to system misconfiguration or resource constraints that must be
DOC> fixed before attempting to recompile these objects.
DOC>#
OBJECTS WITH ERRORS
4
DOC> The following query reports the number of errors caught during
DOC> recompilation. If this number is non-zero, please query the error
DOC> messages in the table UTL_RECOMP_ERRORS to see if any of these errors
DOC> are due to misconfiguration or resource constraints that must be
DOC> fixed before objects can compile successfully.
DOC>#
ERRORS DURING RECOMPILATION
4
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Invoking Ultra Search Install/Upgrade validation procedure VALIDATE_WK
Ultra Search VALIDATE_WK done with no error
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
However for some reason the job utlrp.sql only shows 4 invalids as shown when I run it. But the number changes once the script is finished and I am not sure why. If I query SELECT COUNT(*) FROM obj$ WHERE status IN (4, 5, 6) now after utlrp.sql has finished running I get the below
SQL> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM obj$ WHERE status IN (4, 5, 6);
COUNT(*)
234
But if I query the same query while utlrp.sql is running I get a number as low as 10 I have seen but once the script finishes it goes back up. I don't know what to do. I have run autoconfig on both the db and apps tier. Is there anything anyone can suggest me ? I am totally lost on this.
Thanks..

Hi I did set the disablefast_validate=TRUE and re-ran only utlrp.sql to re-compile now I have a lot more packages compiled but I still have some invalids. I just want to know can I ignore these and move on or are they important packages / objects in APPS which may impact functionality ?
below is the results of the invalid objects.
Thanks
OWNER,OBJECT_NAME,SUBOBJECT_NAME,OBJECT_ID,DATA_OBJECT_ID,OBJECT_TYPE,CREATED,LAST_DDL_TIME,TIMESTAMP,STATUS,TEMPORARY,GENERATED,SECONDARY,NAMESPACE,EDITION_NAME
PUBLIC,WWV_FLOW_LIST_OF_VALUES_DATA,,1006661,,SYNONYM,09-FEB-07,09-FEB-07,2007-02-09:00:33:03,INVALID,N,N,N,1,ORA$BASE
PUBLIC,WWV_FLOW_LISTS_OF_VALUES$,,1006663,,SYNONYM,09-FEB-07,09-FEB-07,2007-02-09:00:33:03,INVALID,N,N,N,1,ORA$BASE
PUBLIC,WWV_FLOW_GENERIC,,1006687,,SYNONYM,09-FEB-07,09-FEB-07,2007-02-09:00:33:03,INVALID,N,N,N,1,ORA$BASE
PUBLIC,WWV_FLOW_FIELD_TEMPLATES,,1006699,,SYNONYM,09-FEB-07,09-FEB-07,2007-02-09:00:33:03,INVALID,N,N,N,1,ORA$BASE
RE,RE_PROFILER,,1207268,0,PACKAGE BODY,17-NOV-04,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:52:51,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
HERMAN,RDT_1,,1713973,1713973,TABLE,18-JAN-06,18-JAN-06,2006-01-18:13:18:02,INVALID,N,N,N,1,
APPS,XLA_00707_AAD_C_000026_PKG,,2362389,0,PACKAGE BODY,03-AUG-07,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:52:52,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
APPS,XLA_20065_AAD_C_000030_PKG,,2370236,0,PACKAGE BODY,16-AUG-07,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:53:05,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
APPS,FSAH_DUPLICATE_PKG,,2385307,0,PACKAGE BODY,23-AUG-07,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:53:08,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
APPS,XLA_00707_AAD_C_000044_PKG,,2661674,0,PACKAGE BODY,14-JAN-08,05-APR-12,2012-04-05:10:53:08,INVALID,N,N,N,2,
APPS,MSD_DEM_OBI_DEMANTRA_MV,,3255317,,MATERIALIZED VIEW,09-JUL-08,09-JUL-08,2008-07-09:09:14:28,INVALID,N,N,N,19,
CA,F,,3260665,3260665,TABLE,24-SEP-08,24-SEP-08,2008-09-24:16:00:14,INVALID,N,N,N,1,
CA,G,,3260683,3260683,TABLE,24-SEP-08,24-SEP-08,2008-09-24:16:00:15,INVALID,N,N,N,1,

Upgrade Issue - Status MVA0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for