Upgrade or Full package

I am intending to upgrade to CS5 from DW8.
I can get a teacher discount. Can't find an upgrade for teachers, just the full version.
Should I uninstall DW8 before adding CS5?

Education versions are allways new, not upgrades
Adobe Education
http://www.adobe.com/education/students/studentteacherlicensing/school_listing.html
http://www.adobe.com/education/students/studentteacheredition/eligibility.html
http://www.adobe.com/education/students/studentteacherlicensing/
First, make a full hard drive backup... such as...
The product I use is at http://www.terabyteunlimited.com/image-for-linux.htm
Image runs off of a bootable CD via Linux (the Zip you download includes a program to make the bootable CD) and it reads EVERYTHING on the drive, even the hidden registration information, so everything is restored when needed... and you may restore the image to a brand new drive in case of a crash or you simply want to go back to where you were, and not have to re-install anything
Then... I would deactivate and uninstall the previous version... but that is only MY choice

Similar Messages

  • I am currently on the Photoshop and lightroom cc bundle, but for my coarse i need InDesign, if i upgrade to full package ($600) do i get that aswell? is it a dramatic difference between the cc and Cs6? would it be better to invest in it, and can i do a pa

    I am currently on the Photoshop and lightroom cc bundle, but for my coarse i need InDesign, if i upgrade to full package ($600) do i get that aswell? is it a dramatic difference between the cc and Cs6? would it be better to invest in it, and can i do a payment plan?

    The complete CC has indesign included in it.
    Regarding your second question: CC is the advanced version of CS6 with advanced & additional features & functions.
    The payment plan for education will suit you the best since you are studying.
    Please refer to Adobe Creative Cloud for students and teachers | Adobe
    Student software discounts, student eligibility | Adobe
    Regards
    Rajshree

  • I have PS 4,5,and 6 installed on my Macbook Pro as well as Lightroom 4 and 5. Can I remove PS 4 and 5 and LR 4?  PS 4 is the total install and PS 5 and 6 are upgrades. LR 4 is the full package with LR an upgrade.

    I have PS 4,5,and 6 installed on my Macbook Pro as well as Lightroom 4 and 5. Can I remove PS 4 and 5 and LR 4? PS 4 is the total install and PS 5 and 6 are upgrades. LR 4 is the full package with LR an upgrade.
    I need space!

    First let me disabuse of a misconception:  All Adobe upgrades are FULL installers.  Whether you buy them as upgrades or new versions does not make an iota of difference.  The upgrade installers do not need to find a prior version installed, they just prompt you for the old serial number as well as the old one, and they do not rely on the old version in the least.
    Second, the time to uninstall an older version is BEFORE upgrading to a newer one.  Otherwise, the uninstaller from the older versions will mess up with your new install.  There are a gazillion files that are named the same and in the same locations as the new one.
    Your best bet now is to uninstall ALL the Photoshop versions you have installed, including the newest one, one by one, then run the Adobe CS Cleaner Tool, then run Repair Permissions from Apple's Desk Utility, and finally re-install the latest version.
    The other alternative, if your boot HD is large enough (very doubtful in case of a laptop like a Mac Book), is to leave all versions on it.
    Your choice.

  • I am a student who subscribed to the 9.99 photography package, I didn't realize there was a discount for students.  I would like to upgrade to the full package with the student discount.  I can not find the option for this. How do I do this?

    I am a student who subscribed to the 9.99 photography package, I didn't realize there was a discount for students.  I would like to upgrade to the full package with the student discount.  I can not find the option for this. How do I do this?

    Hi Djmontanalv,
    Please go through the link below.
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cancel-membership-subscription.html
    Regards,
    Anand

  • I use Pro Logic 9 and see that to upgrade to Pro Logic X I need to buy the full package again. Does apple offer special conditions for their Apple clients ? Are users of apple care protection plan better served ?

    I use Pro Logic 9.1.8.  and see that to upgrade to Pro Logic X I need to buy the full package again. Does apple offer special conditions for their Apple clients ? Are users of apple care protection plan better served ?

    Old saying applies here most of the time......
    "If it ain't broken, don't fix it"
    I choose to use LP9 with Snow Leopard myself (10.6.8 and 9.1.6) for most of my commercial work simply because I find that combo very stable and provides the best overall performance for my setups here... but I am also using LPX with Mavericks as part of my client support and that works fine too although with a drop in performance due to the heavier demands made on the hardware by the newer OS X and LPX graphic routines for example..

  • PS and LR bundle. Do I pay both fees if I upgrade to full Creative Cloud?

    Hi
    I am considering purchasing the PS and LR bundle. However, I might wish to upgrade to full CC ($49.99 p.m) before the annual contract term of the initial bundle expires. How will this work. Would I still have to pay for the initial bundle AND the full suite, or will the PS and LR package price be absorbed in the full price?

    Hi JaneSamurai,
    As answered correctly by Ssprengel and Twenty_one, you can upgrade your plan from the Photoshop Photography Program to Creative Cloud complete.  On the date the upgrade is done, you will be charged for the new plan and receive a refund for any unused days for that month on the current plan, accordingly.
    If you want to switch/upgrade the plan so please refer to the below mentioned link under "Upgrade single-app memberships to a full Creative Cloud memberships"
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/membership-subscript ion-troubleshooting-creative-cloud.html
    You can also contact our Customer Support
    http://www.adobe.com/support/download-install/supportinfo/
    Let us know if this helps,
    Thanks!
    Gurleen

  • I just upgraded my iMac to Lion, and a few seconds ago, I upgraded the iWork package and now I'm having some problems with the new version of Pages (4.1) When I try to change something in a document, a message says "the program is not responding"

    I just upgraded my iMac to Lion, and a few seconds ago, I upgraded the iWork package and now I'm having some problems with the new version of Pages (4.1) When I try to change something in a document, a message says "the program is not responding", so I have to force it to close. By the way, the SAVE botton stays the same even I change erverything in my document. Please, a have a work to finish, **** me. What I can do abou it?

    I just upgraded my iMac to Lion, and a few seconds ago, I upgraded the iWork package and now I'm having some problems with the new version of Pages (4.1) When I try to change something in a document, a message says "the program is not responding", so I have to force it to close. By the way, the SAVE botton stays the same even I change erverything in my document. Please, a have a work to finish, **** me. What I can do abou it?

  • Specify the full package path

    Well, here is a real beginner question. How can i specify the full package path of SUNs java.io package? And another beginner question, where is this package located on my computer? (relative to my java sdk installion path of course)

    Acctually I have a severe problem with leJOS. Here is my code:
    import java.io.*;
    import josx.rcxcomm.RCXBean;
    public class PCModule
         public static void main( String[] args )
              recv();
         public static void recv()
              RCXBean rcxb = new RCXBean();
              try
                   rcxb.setComPort("USB");
                   while(true)
                        System.out.println( "Test" );
              catch( IOException e )
    }This should compile fine, if lejosc would use the SUN java.io But it intends to use the own implementation of java.io and I really need to find a workaround to this problem because otherwise the code wont compile throwing the error, that the out symbol cannot be resolved.
    Btw. this part of the program should listen to the mindstorms IR-Tower for messages of a RCX-Brig and wirte them to an output stream.
    Isn't there a way to force lejosc to use the java.io package from sun?
    P.S.: If I don't use the System.out-line everything is fine, so lejos is installed correctly and if write a java test app everything is fine, so the SUN Java SDK is installed correctly too.

  • I have Adobe Reader on my computer & want Adobe X Standard - Do I need to buy upgrade or full?

    I have Adobe Reader on my computer and want to install Adobe X Standard - Do I need to purchase an upgrade or full version?

    You buy a full version. There are no upgrade discounts from a tool that is free, anyway.
    Mylenium

  • Full Package

    Hey am new to this and im a bit confused with all the different licensing  options, do i understand it to be rite if i perchase a full package do i get full use out of it for life but pay full price, and if you have a different licence it last for a couple of years.
    don't realy understand

    need more energy resources for your computer

  • Full package name?

    All,
    I am very new to Javadoc. I would like to know how (if possible) to eliminate the full package name from any descriptions. For example, if I have a method that returns a Hashtable, the Javadoc that gets generated looks like this:
    public static java.util.Hashtable newMethod()
    I would like it to look like this:
    public static Hashtable newMethod()
    I'm using the Eclipse tool, and that is actually calling Javadoc and passing the appropriate parms (v1.4).
    I'm new to Javadoc, so I don't know if the generated method (with the package name) is preferred. I've also read some of the forum's comments on how to get started with this. I'm attempting to consolidate the lengthy Javadoc documentation, and some of the comments I've read have been helpful.
    Thanks,
    Van Williams

    The default should display the package name only
    for classes not in the "current" package.
    For 1.4, use "-noqualifier all" to prevent the package
    name from appearing ahead of the class name
    for all packages. This is further described at:
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html#noqualifier
    You can reduce the confusion this may cause
    by using -linkoffline to create links to
    classes not being documented, such as to
    java.util.HashTable in your example. This
    is further described at:
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/tooldocs/windows/javadoc.html#linkoffline
    -Doug Kramer
    Javadoc team

  • Full package name needed when using FindClass?

    When loading a class for use by the invocation interface, do I need to use the full package name of the class to be loaded, or just the class name?
    For example, I have a program called MyProg. It is part of package MyProg, and when I run it, I have to do so using java MyProg.MyProg.
    When loading the class, I've tried both of the following:
    cls = (*env)->FindClass(env, "MyProg\\MyProg");
    cls = (*env)->FindClass(env, "MyProg");Neither one works. Anyone know for sure which one it shoulf be? I suspect that there is a classpath issue coming into play as well, but that's another post. :)

    Thanks! Just to clarify, this is on a Win32 machine.

  • Class will only run with full package path - why?

    Hi,
    I've recently used Ant to package up a jar file with a simple gui application. Though I believe I've done everything right in terms of packaging I find that when I copy jar file to another computer not only do I need to unjar it I also need to use the full package name in order to get it to run. I thought that I should be able to run it by either using: java -jar CheckLogs
    or jar -xvf logUtils.jar, and then java CheckLogs.
    Instead only this will work:
    java net.kenjanuski.utils.CheckLogs
    My understanding is that if I put package net.kenjanuski.utils at top of file that I shouldn't have to use the full package name. Am I missing something obvious? By the way Ant did create the proper directory structure if I unpack the jar: net/kenjanuski/utils/...
    Thanks for any ideas,
    Ken

    I'm not going to try to answer the jar question, but as far as package name goes, if your CheckLogs class starts with the statement "package net.kenjanuski.utils;" then the fully qualified name of the class is net.kenjanuski.utils.CheckLogs. The java.exe command uses the fully qualified name of the class. So the only way it will work is "java net.kenjanuski.utils.CheckLogs" just as you found out.
    You can run the Jar file if you define the class in a Manifest file. See http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jar/basics/run.html

  • I don't need the full package. Is there an easy way to change from the full to photographer's package?

    I'm trying to save money and realize that I don't need the full package. I wanted to just change over to photographer's pack with just Lightroom and Photoshop but I seem to be missing the way to do that through my account. Is there an easier way?

    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/return-cancel-or-change-order.html

  • Import vs full package name

    So, I decided to fumble a bit with JavaFX. After having gotten myself a sh*tload of stress doing stuff in Flash and Actionscript, I'm ready for something that is intended as "code" from the ground up. One thing I ran into is this: AFAIK I have two identical custom nodes, the only difference is that one uses full package names and the other uses imports. The components just show an image.
    Full package version:
    public class SfeerNode extends javafx.scene.CustomNode
        public var sfeerimage : javafx.scene.image.Image;
        override function create() : javafx.scene.Node
            return javafx.scene.Group
                content:
                [     javafx.scene.image.ImageView
                          image: sfeerimage
    }And the import version:
    import javafx.scene.*;
    import javafx.scene.image.*;
    import javafx.scene.paint.*;
    import javafx.scene.shape.*;
    public class SfeerNode2 extends CustomNode
        public var sfeerimage : Image;
        override function create() : Node
            return Group
                content:
                [     ImageView
                          image: sfeerimage
    }Usage is very straight forward, just like ImageView, and I can toggle between the two by simply adding or removing "2" after "SfeerNode" in the main code.
    The problem: the full package version does NOT show the image, the import version does.
    Why?

    It is definitely a bug.
    It is possible to extend only CustomNode class to make the first sample work .
    import javafx.scene.CustomNode;
    public class A extends CustomNode {
        public var sfeerimage : javafx.scene.image.Image;
        override function create(): javafx.scene.Node{
            return javafx.scene.Group {
                content:[ javafx.scene.image.ImageView {
                          image: sfeerimage
    }

Maybe you are looking for