Upgrading from 4.2 to 5.1 Performance Issues

Hi All,
We are finally upgrading from 4.2 to 5.1. Both our 4.2 and 5.1 servers are identical, however, we are noticing major performance issues in one of our applications that contains 7 account hierarchies and 4 entity hierarchies. Creating a simple any by any can take up to 3.5 minutes in 5.1 where as it takes less than 2 seconds in 4.2. We could split up some of the account hierarchies into separate dimension and applications, but I find it hard to believe that we need to redesign our applications to fit 5.1 handling of multiple hierarchies.
Has anyone else run into similar issues, if so, what was done to overcome them?
Thanks.

Hi,
We had some performance issues with BPC 5.1 SP4, we upgrade to SP9 and take recomendations found on the How To doc below found here on sdn:
[How to Use MDX Dimension Formulas Article |https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/008d665b-94bf-2a10-78b2-b32ffe04ba73]
As I know just account hierarchies are supported (at least in our case) with hard limitations on hierarchies formulas.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Carlos

Similar Messages

VCD suite upgrade from 5.5 to 5.8, any issues?

Hello
Has anyone done the vCD suite upgrade from 5.5 to 5.8?
Did you encounter any issues during this event?
Any tips and tricks you can share are helpful.
Regards
/Tony

Please refer VMware vCloud Suite 5.8 Release Notes to be aware of the known issues.If you have any specific concerns please do let know.

I have an older MacBook Intel 2 Duo processor 2.4Gh 4GB mem running 10.6.8. Yahoo just informed me I must upgrade my Safari (5.1.10). How much can I upgrade from 10.6.8 without degrading performance?

I have and older MacBook Intel 2 Duo processor 2.4 Ghz, 4GB mem, running 10.6.8 and Safari 5.1.10. Yahoo has just informed me that they will no longer support Safari 5.1.10 and my question is how much higher than 10.6.8 can I go to get a better Safari before I start reducing performance on an older computer? It is about 6 years old but runs fine for my purposes.

If you want to stay with 10.6, try Firefox which is still being updated.
Firefox
Check that your computer is compatible with Mountain Lion/Mavericks/Yosemite.
To check the model number hold down the option/alt key, go to the Apple menu and select System Information.
MacBook (Late 2008 Aluminum, or Early 2009 or newer) model number 5,1 or higher
MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer) model number 3,1 or higher
Your Mac needs:
OS X v10.6.8 or OS X Lion already installed
2 GB or more of memory (More is better - 4 GB minimum seems to be the consensus)
8 GB or more of available space
Check to make sure your applications are compatible. PowerPC applications are no longer supported after 10.6.
Application Compatibility
Applications Compatibility (2)
Do a backup before installing.
Mountain Lion
If your computer isn’t compatible, you might be able to upgrade to Lion.
Computer Compatibility - Lion                       Lion

Upgrade from 10.6.8 to Mavericks server: issue with authenticated bind

Hello, I have tried upgrading a 10.6.8 server to 3.1.2 Mavericks server and found I can't bind 10.9.x clients.
I need to keep using authenticated bind to manage clients in Workgroup Manager
I have exported the 10.6.8 OD database and imported into a clean installation of Mavericks 3.1.2 server and everything went fine that far.
I then noticed that authenticated bind in Mavericks now requires SSL and the certiicate.
Once I have imported the 10.6.8 OD database into the new server (same name and IP), only the selfsigned certificate coming from the 10.6.8 server is being imported and OD service remains "unprotected" without any certificate assigned (it seems I can't change this)
The problem is I can successfully bind 10.8.x clients against the 10.9 server while this seems not to be possible with 10.9.x clients when using authenticated bind.
If I create a new OD domain, there's an intemediate certificate assigned by default and I can bind 10.9.x clients (authenticated bind).
Am I missing something obvious?
Many thanks for your help
Cheers
Carlo

Hello and many thanks to all for your hints
@Strontium90 I am aware I should move to profiles and I am working towards this goal, but I had mixed results as far as reliability here.
Anyway, I took my time to perform the upgrade once again from scratch and it's defenatly something related to certificates
The only way to (authenticated) bind a 10.9 test client is when I create a new OD domain and the server uses the intemediate certificate that it's automatically created and assigned to OD service
Using the sefl-signed certificate (the existing one - that is imported along with the OD DB - or a new one assigne to it) does not work with the imported DB.
This is the error I get when I try to bind with dsconfigldap
iMac-di-admin:~ admin$ sudo /usr/sbin/dsconfigldap -vsemgx -a my.ODserver.FQDN.com
Password:
dsconfigldap verbose mode
Using suggested computer ID <imac-di-admin>
Options selected by user:
Enforce Secure Authentication is enabled
SSL was chosen
Add server option selected
Server name provided as <my.ODserver.FQDN.com>
Computer ID provided as <imac-di-admin>
Local username determined to be <root>
Enforce man-in-the-middle only policy if server supports it.
Adding new node to search policies
Enforce packet encryption policy if server supports it.
Enforce packet signing policy if server supports it.
Certificates will be automatically added to your system keychain in order to talk to this server.
Would you like to continue (y/n)? y
Error: Description unavailable (9006)
While this is the error I get from Directory Utility
I think I'll seek support from a consultant... ...it all seems beyod my skills
Many thanks again!
Carlo

Upgrade from win 7 to win 8.1 issue

I updated my win from 7 to 8.1 my WiFi adapter is not able to identify network.
prior to upgrade when i was in win 7 it was working.
Can some guide with troubleshooting steps that i can do.
I did uninstall the network adapter couple of times but no luck and ran troubleshooter as well but no luck.
When i ran the troubleshooter and at the end it throws an error saying the default gateway is not available .
network config is set up DHCP .
Can some one guide me here

Hello,
I'd ask in the
Windows 8.1 forum on Microsoft Community.
Karl
When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
My Book:
Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C406F75746C6F6F6B2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

Upgrade from ECC 6.0 EHP5 to EHP7 issue with PO header

HI Experts,
We Upgrade the Ecc 6.0 recently from EHP 5 To EHP 7. In EHP 5 when we select the PO type (REW - Reject ) in ME21N , Reject tab will appear at header level.
In EHP 7 When we enter the PO type (REW - Reject ) in ME21N ,Reject tab will not appearing and it is asking for the organisation elements and vendor .After entering the all the organisation data only reject tab appear in header level.
My client wants EHP 5 Functionality in EHP 7.What clould be the reason to behave like this.How to achive this requirement.
Regards,
Venkat.

Hi Krishna Rao,
It is proved lot of times if you are upgraded new enhancement package in the server then enhancements need to re-check and do manually development in new server and retesting in quality server before moving to Production server.
Ask Abaper to check whether enhancement updated in new enhanced server . If no then Abaper need to update manually.
Regards,
Ravindra

Satellite L300 - Upgrade from Vista Home Basic to Home Premium issues

Hi all,
I just recently got a Satellite L300 with an OEM version of Vista Home Basic.
I have a copy of Windows Vista: Home Premium (upgrade) disc and decided to use it on the laptop.
I put the disc in, and followed the steps however the upgrade option is blanked out... This is if I use the product key provided with the disc or not.
The laptop came with Service Pack 1 already installed and the disc I own was released into the shops before Service Pack 1.
My main question really is how can I get my disc to upgrade my version of Vista. I have tried searching Google, this website, Microsoft's website and I keep getting the same answer.
Basically go through options and do anytime upgrade. All of these are for me to buy from Microsoft which would be kind of pointless as I already have a copy.
I did read something at on a site that stated my disc would have to have the service pack on the disk and I seen a website with some kind of disc editing program for Vista but im not too keen on using it and the 'how to' wasn't very easy to understand.
Also, im not too keen on calling either Toshiba or Microsoft on premium rate numbers for help with something I have already bought and paid for and should be as simple as a few steps.
Anyway hope someone can help because I would really like to upgrade.

Hello
I understand you and it is really annoying but what to do now? the fact is that Toshiba has offered this notebook with certain Vista version. This version must be offered with best and latest available Microsoft security updates. Due to this Toshiba offers it with latest SP1 option.
So now you try to install update offered long time ago and probably offered before SP1 was on the market. I understand your point of view but, in my opinion, it has nothing to do with Toshiba now, and you should try to find solution with Microsoft. For example you can also pick up info from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930733
Clean Vista Home Premium can be installed without any problems. All drivers, tools and utilities can be downloaded from Toshiba support & download page.

HT1338 i have os x 10.4 and need 10.5 to upgrade itunes for an ipod touch 4th gen...can i purchase 10.5 from the apple store and can i upgrade from 10.4 to 10.5 without issues

i currently have os x 10.4 and per itunes, i need 10.5 to download the itunes version that supports the ipod touch 4th generation
can i purchase 10.5 on the apple store and is it safe to go from 10.4 directly to 10.5....what is the best procedure

You cannot get Leopard from Apple any more. You will find copies from third-party vendors on eBay, Amazon, or Google.
If you have an Intel Mac you can upgrade to Snow Leopard instead provided your model meets the requirements shown below:
Upgrading to Snow Leopard
You must purchase Snow Leopard through the Apple Store: Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard - Apple Store (U.S.). The price is $19.99 plus tax. You will be sent physical media by mail after placing your order.
After you install Snow Leopard you will have to download and install the Mac OS X 10.6.8 Update Combo v1.1 to update Snow Leopard to 10.6.8 and give you access to the App Store. Access to the App Store enables you to download Mountain Lion if your computer meets the requirements.
     Snow Leopard General Requirements
       1. Mac computer with an Intel processor
       2. 1GB of memory
       3. 5GB of available disk space
       4. DVD drive for installation
       5. Some features require a compatible Internet service provider;
           fees may apply.
       6. Some features require Apple’s MobileMe service; fees and
           terms apply.

Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 - issue on search help

Hi,
After SPAU changes on search help like DEBI,KOSTN and DEBIE while on activate its shows the warning message as included search help using same hot key V.
Can any one help me on how to solve this warning message.
Thanks,
Manikandan.

Hi Mani,
As long as it is a warning u dont need to worry.Check if the search help is working
Regards,
Amit

The optimizer changed after upgrade from 8i to 10g

I have upgraded my Oracle database from 8i (8.1.7.3) to 10g (10.2.0.3). After upgraded, there's some SQLs are with performance issue that the response time is very slow. The SQL can run very fast (around 1 seconde) in the pre-upgrade environment. Also, after generating the execution plan, there's different from the original enivronment (8i) which the query using some full table scan instead of index scan originally used in 8i.
The optimizer_mode of 8i is RULE and it's CHOOSE when upgraded.
My questions are:
1. Do I have any init.ora parameters setting in 10g environment which differ from 8i?
2. What method of analyzing tables is appropriate to use in 10g? Will this affect the performance like my case?
Thanks,
Wai

Please have a look to following threads:
Re: Optimizer Statistics collection after upgrade from 8i to 10R2
Re: DB upgrade from oracle 8.1.7 to oracle 10.2.0.2

Upgrade from Oracle 8i in Win98 to Oracle 11g in Window Vista

Hi,
I have an existing system that runs in Window98 using Oracle 8i as database. We are planning to convert the system from using Oracle 8i to 11g, and this new converted system will be running in Window Vista.
What I have in mind is doing export and import from Oracle 8i to 11g, but it is quite troublesome. Is there anyway I can upgrade the db to 11g in Window Vista?

Hi,
When upgrading from 8i to 11g, you cannot perform direct upgrade anyway.
If you want to upgrade (not using exp/imp), you can install 9i (9.2.0.4 and up) on the win98 machine, and upgrade the database to 9i.
Then you can take the database files, copy them (like cold backup) to the vista server, and you will able to upgrade it to 11g.
Note that you cannot use the DBUA in this scenario, you will have to upgrade it manually.
Manual upgrade: [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28300/upgrade.htm#i1011600]
Liron Amitzi
Senior DBA consultant
[www.dbsnaps.com]
[www.orbiumsoftware.com]

Utlu111i.sql upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.1.0.7

My question is re the COMPATIBLE initialization parameter.
when run the utlu111i.sql there NO warning about the COMPATIBLE parameter.
So, the appropriate action to go fine with the upgrade is to leave the current value or to change before the upgrade.
SQL> @utlu111i.sql;
Oracle Database 11.1 Pre-Upgrade Information Tool 06-12-2011 11:15:37
Database:
--> name:     TBABES
--> version:     10.2.0.3.0
--> compatible: 10.2.0.3.0
--> blocksize:     8192
--> platform:     Linux 64-bit for AMD
--> timezone file: V4
Tablespaces: [make adjustments in the current environment]
--> SYSTEM tablespace is adequate for the upgrade.
.... minimum required size: 1431 MB
.... AUTOEXTEND additional space required: 351 MB
--> UNDOTBS1 tablespace is adequate for the upgrade.
.... minimum required size: 26 MB
--> SYSAUX tablespace is adequate for the upgrade.
.... minimum required size: 778 MB
.... AUTOEXTEND additional space required: 308 MB
--> TEMP tablespace is adequate for the upgrade.
.... minimum required size: 61 MB
.... AUTOEXTEND additional space required: 31 MB
--> IAS_META tablespace is adequate for the upgrade.
.... minimum required size: 205 MB
--> B2B_RT tablespace is adequate for the upgrade.
.... minimum required size: 39 MB
--> BAM tablespace is adequate for the upgrade.
.... minimum required size: 7 MB
Update Parameters: [Update Oracle Database 11.1 init.ora or spfile]
WARNING: --> "shared_pool_size" needs to be increased to at least 448 MB
WARNING: --> "java_pool_size" needs to be increased to at least 128 MB
Renamed Parameters: [Update Oracle Database 11.1 init.ora or spfile]
-- No renamed parameters found. No changes are required.
Obsolete/Deprecated Parameters: [Update Oracle Database 11.1 init.ora or spfile]
--> "remote_os_authent"
--> "background_dump_dest" replaced by     "diagnostic_dest"
--> "user_dump_dest" replaced by "diagnostic_dest"
--> "core_dump_dest" replaced by "diagnostic_dest"
Components: [The following database components will be upgraded or installed]
--> Oracle Catalog Views     [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle Packages and Types     [upgrade] VALID
--> JServer JAVA Virtual Machine [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle XDK for Java      [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle Workspace Manager     [upgrade] VALID
--> OLAP Analytic Workspace     [upgrade] VALID
--> OLAP Catalog          [upgrade] VALID
--> EM Repository          [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle Text           [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle XML Database      [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle Java Packages     [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle interMedia          [upgrade] VALID
--> Spatial               [upgrade] VALID
--> Data Mining           [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle Ultra Search      [upgrade] VALID
--> Expression Filter          [upgrade] VALID
--> Rule Manager          [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle Application Express     [upgrade] VALID
--> Oracle OLAP API          [upgrade] VALID
Miscellaneous Warnings
WARNING: --> Database contains stale optimizer statistics.
.... Refer to the 11g Upgrade Guide for instructions to update
.... statistics prior to upgrading the database.
.... Component Schemas with stale statistics:
.... SYS
.... WKSYS
WARNING: --> Database contains INVALID objects prior to upgrade.
.... The list of invalid SYS/SYSTEM objects was written to
.... registry$sys_inv_objs.
.... The list of non-SYS/SYSTEM objects was written to
.... registry$nonsys_inv_objs.
.... Use utluiobj.sql after the upgrade to identify any new invalid
.... objects due to the upgrade.
.... USER DSGATEWAY has 1 INVALID objects.
WARNING: --> Database contains schemas with objects dependent on network
packages.
.... Refer to the 11g Upgrade Guide for instructions to configure Network ACLs.
.... USER WKSYS has dependent objects.
.... USER BAM has dependent objects.
.... USER FLOWS_020200 has dependent objects.
.... USER OWF_MGR has dependent objects.
.... USER ORASSO has dependent objects.
.... USER PORTAL has dependent objects.
WARNING: --> EM Database Control Repository exists in the database.
.... Direct downgrade of EM Database Control is not supported. Refer to the
.... 11g Upgrade Guide for instructions to save the EM data prior to upgrade.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Please help as the down time for the upgrade is in progress.
Cheers.

Pl see the documentation - http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28300/intro.htm#UPGRD12473
In an upgrade project, one typically does a test upgrade and then tests the application (with compatibility set to the upgraded version) to ensure there are no performance issues. What has your testing revealed ? If there are no issues, omit the compatible parameter (it will default to 11.1.0.7)
Oracle 11gR1 Upgrade Companion          (Doc ID 601807.1)
HTH
Srini

An error has occurred after upgrading from MBAM 1.0 to 2.0

The upgrade went fine, uninstalled MBAM v1.0 from SQL and IIS servers, rebooted servers and re-installed with MBAM v2.0. However, now when I go to the webportal every page shows the "An error has occurred" message.
I've checked the webconfig files under the Help Desk Website folder and it's got our server path in it. the webportal was working before the upgrade.

Good to hear it was a simple fix. I'm about to upgrade our production environment tomorrow night. Going from MBAM 1.0 to 2.0 SP1. Not sure where you upgraded from, but did you run into any issues. I've been looking and haven't seen anyone encounter any
real issues. We are not doing the SCCM integration btw.

Performance Issue: Retrieving records from Oracle Database

While retrieving data from Oracle database we are facing performance issues.
The query is returning 890 records and while displaying it on the jsp page, the page is taking almost 18 minutes for displaying records.
I have observed that cpu usage is 100% while processing the request.
Could any one advise what are the methods at DB end or Java end we can think of to avoid such issues.
Thanks
R.

passion_for_java wrote:
Will it make any difference if I select columns instead of ls.*
possibly, especially if there's a lot or data being returned.
Less data over the wire means a faster response,
You may also want to look at your database, is that outer join really needed? Does it perform? Are your indexes good?
A bad index (or a missing one) can kill query performance (we've seen performance of queries drop from seconds to hours when indexes got corrupted).
A missing index can cause full table scans, which of course kill performance if the table is large.

Upgrade from 2.6.34 fails. No devices recognized.

I should have posted this over a month ago, but I've been in the process of moving. I frequently run powerpill -Syu to keep up to date, and debug issues as the come up, but the upgrade from 2.6.34 caused so many issues that I've been unable to attempt to resolve until now.
Here's what I did.
pacman -Syu
Here's what happened:
boot into upgraded kernel and USB drivers are not found, so I can't use the keyboard or mouse. During boot, eth0 is not found (there's an error message to this effect), can't start ssh.
so basically the computer is unusable. It seems that none of the drivers are found, but I can't test because I have no way to input into the system.
To resolve I booted in using system rescue cd and rolled back the kernel upgrade.
My system:
Atom 330 ION
RAID0
Stock kernel
Where should I start to fix this? I'll run the upgrade again and post the error output in a few hours when I finish work. But if somebody has some ideas beforehand I'd like to try that before crippling my computer.
Moderator, not sure if this is the correct forum, it's a package upgrade issue, but also a kernel problem. If I've posted incorrectly, please move the topic.

Hi all,
I'm experiencing the same problem after upgrading from 2.6.15 to 2.6.16. I get the following upon booting:
mount: Mounting /dev/root on /new_root failed: No such device or address
pivot_root: pivot_root: No such file or directory
umount: /initrd: No such file or directory
umount: /initrd: No such file or directory
/linuxrc: 382: /sbin/busybox: not found
Freeing unused kernel memory: 244k freed
BusyBox v1.01 (2006.03.10-22:56+0000) Built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
So I went to a backup kernel and tried to rebuild the initrd:
# mkinitrd auto
Checking Input...
ERROR: Your ramdisk size (4096 KB) is too low! It must be at least 16384 KB.
Note also that I'm getting a lot of these messages during the boot process, no matter what kernel I choose:
FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.15.4-ARCH/modules.dep: No such file or directory
Any ideas on this one? I'm stuck! Thank you!

Upgrading from 4.2 to 5.1 Performance Issues

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for