Upgrading to 3.0 or 3.2 GHz processors - is it worth it?

I'm looking at purchasing a Mac Pro, as I am in need of a solid, high performance desktop machine that can burn through large photo and video editing tasks. These include editing video (currently SD, soon to be HD) in Final Cut Express, encoding/transcoding video, authoring DVD's, and photo editing/retouching using Aperture and Photoshop. I am especially looking forward to seeing how the 8-cores affect my encoding/transcoding tasks.
I see the base configuration includes 2 x quad-core 2.8 GHz Xeon processors, and I have the option of moving up to dual quad-core 3.0 GHz processors for an additional $800, or to dual quad-core 3.2 GHz processors for an additional $1,600.
How much would I benefit from going from 2.8 GHz to 3.0 GHz? This seems to me to be a rather small jump (0.2 GHz per processor), and I am wondering if that is worth an extra $800. At the same time, I would like to "future proof" my machine as much as possible (i.e. to make it last as long as possible before having to buy a new one). I realize that this is not always possible but I would still like to try.
I suspect that the difference between 2.8 and 3.0 is a fairly small one. If it's something on the order of, say, a few extra seconds to a minute in an encode, then that is something that I can live with.
Thanks for your advice.

Hi dburr;
If you go Bare Feats, it will show you the differences.
Allan

Similar Messages

Can I upgrade mac air to 16GB 1.8 GHz Intel Core i5Model Name:     MacBook Air   Model Identifier:     MacBookAir5,2   Processor Name:     Intel Core i5   Processor Speed:     1.8 GHz   Number of Processors:     1   Total Number of Cores:     2   L2 Cac

Can I upgrade mac air to 16GB 1.8 GHz Intel Core i5Model Name:
MacBook Air   Model Identifier:
MacBookAir5,2   Processor Name:
Intel Core i5   Processor Speed:
1.8 GHz   Number of Processors:
1   Total Number of Cores:
2   L2 Cache (per Core):
256 KB   L3 Cache:

No. 8 GBs is the maximum, and it had to be installed at purchase as it's hardwired to the motherboard.

Upgrade to Maverics on Pro 2.2 GHZ

Can i update or upgrade mit Mac Book Pro with 2.2 GHZ Processor to Maverics?

aloys.wiesmann,
your MacBook Pro can upgrade to Mavericks if you meet its other minimum requirements:
Mac OS X 10.6.8 or newer currently installed;
2 GB of RAM installed;
8 GB of free disk space on your boot partition.
(You’ll probably want at least 4 GB of RAM installed and at least 24 GB of free disk space on your boot partition to ensure that Mavericks runs reasonably well.)

Will CS4 work with my 1.6 GHz processor?

I want to buy Photoshop CS4 but I read that I need a minimum 1.8 GHz processor in my PC. My processor is 1.6GHz. What will happen if I try install it in my PC anyway? Will it work? If not, is it possible to upgrade my processor? If so, how much would that cost?

Senorleg wrote:
From what I understand, I need software that will allow me to read my RAW images in a browser to do what this other photographer was doing. I shoot with a Nikon D200 and a D300 so I need to know if Nikon's camera RAW images are compatible with CS3. If they are, I can go with the CS3 and not have to worry about whether or not CS4 will work with my system.
Different Nikons create different NEF files, requiring different versions of the Adobe Camera Raw plug-in.
I don't have the list handy but in any case I think you are going to be struggling processing raw files with that computer.
Here's the list:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/407/kb407111.html
Edit: So you need ACR 4.3 for the D300, which means Photoshop CS3 to run it. So forget CS4!

Is there a noticeable difference between a 1.83 and 2.00 GHz processor?

I am new to apple, and this will be my first Apple laptop computer. I am looking for a laptop that is powerful enough to run programs such as Adobe Photoshop (no more than one photo at a time) and other basic programs such as Microsoft Office. I will be doing no video or gaming. Can you tell me if there is a reason to upgrade from the 1.83GHZ to the 2.00 GHz processor? Thank you.

You are only looking at a difference of 170Mhz. As far as I know the processors are the same except for clock speed. I do not think that you will notice any difference in the two processors for smaller jobs like applying a filter in Photoshop or running a spell check in Office. The 2Ghz will edge ahead for longer term tasks such as editing and compressing video. If something takes 1 hour to compress into "quicktime" (IE. h.264) you may see the 2Ghz MB finish 10 minutes sooner.
Bottom line, from what you are describing, I do not think you will do anything that will be too terribly intensive to notice the difference in speed now. But I always advise to people to buy as FAST as they can afford. Your computer will stay faster for longer. In a few years that extra little bit of speed can come in handy as programs continue to becomes more complex. Somthing intaresting about your situation right now is that Both Office and Photoshop are not Intel native for the Mac, so they will need to be emulated by Rosetta. While it is supposed to be seemless, rosetta is emulated so it is slower. You will get a noticable boost in speed if you upgrade to the native (or Universal) version of these programs when they are made available.
OK, I have blabbed on enough. Hope this helps shed some light on things. (Personally I would go with the 2Ghz.)
- Kiteless

HDV on 3.0 GHz Processor?

Hi there,
I'm looking to upgrade to Premiere Pro CS3, however I'm not sure my system will support HDV editing. The system requirements state a minimum of a 3.4 GHz Processor for HDV editing, but is this really a requirement or a recommendation? I question this because my computer can edit HDV on Pinnacle 11 software. It has a 3.0GHz Processor, 4 GB RAM,500GB HDD, and runs on Win XP. Seems like a capable system to me. I contacted Adobe support and they said it would run, just as not as well. I also asked support at videoguys.com which stated that my system was crap and I need to upgrade. So I could use some of your opinions on whether you think it can handle CS3 before I spend the money for it..
Thanks - Matt

That laptop fact is interesting to me, I wouldn't have better luck with my laptop would I? I hadn't even considered it as it is more of a daily use computer. It's running a 1.6 ghz AMD dual-core with 1 GB RAM, I still can't imagine that would outperform my workstation. Much less handle native HDV in CS3.
Jim you are right about the processor, it's a P4 w/ht, back from the ancient computer year of 2005... I can't check the motherboard specs because I won't be home for a few weeks.
The reason I'm trying to run this inexpensively is because I'm working on a business plan for a small business loan. I already have a JYC GY-HD110U w/accessories, CS3, blu-ray burner, and advertising costs approved. But it happened narrowly, the bank will not like a new workstation added to the tab, as I had foolishly overestimated my current one's ability.
If you guys were in this position, how would you try and handle it? I'd like to get an up to speed computer out of my pocket instead of approaching the bank again. But I havn't yet accepted the loan. I could hold off a year and recalibrate the plan and hope they accept it with another years experience; however, that would be a real downer on all the work I've done to start it. Any opinions?

How do you upgrade OS X 10.4.11 tiger to a higher version of operating system such as OS x 10.5.6 as have tried running the upgrade disc on imac 5,1 with intel processor but only get message saying this cannot be installed with no further explanation ?

how do you upgrade OS X 10.4.11 tiger to a higher version of operating system such as OS X 10.5.6 as have tried running the upgrade disc on imac 5,1 with intel processor but only get message saying this cannot be installed with no further explanation ?

Retail Leopard disc looks like this;
(The disc itself has the same logo). If the one you've got is grey it simply won't work.
Given the retail and second hand prices of Leopard (usually some on Amazon MP), you'll probably find it cheaper to go directly to Snow Leopard, although there could be software updates and printer driver problems that could nullify the difference.

I use a 2003 FW800 MDD desktop, with dual 1.25 GHz processors, and OS10.4.11, and with native Bluetooth card, won't recognize a newer Bluetooth Headphone set as an Input or Output device in System Preferences

I use a Mac 2003 FW800 MDD desktop with dual 1.25 GHz processors, 2 GB memory, and a native Bluetooth card installed. I use OS10.4.11. The FW800 was the only MDD that could use Bluetooth natively, as an optional installation. I use the installed Bluetooth to run an Apple Aluminum Keyboard, and would like to use it with a new (2010) Samsung SBH-600 Bluetooth Headphone set, but, although the set will pair with the computer, and is recognized in both the System Profiler, and the Bluetooth section of System Preferences, it is not recognized in the Sound preferences section of System Preferences as either an Input or Output device. Only the installed external Apple speakers are recognized. I'd like to know if there is anything that can be done to make the Bluetooth system installed work with these headphones - either something that can be changed in the computer settings, or an added external Bluetooth device with different Bluetooth capabilities.

It it may be that you are running either an outdated BT software or the firmware of the card is not up to date.
What version is your BT software? Is it later than 1.5?
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1209
Firmware:
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL354
Along with the firmware, it is likely that the headphones require a later BT revision than you are running. The headphones need rev.2.
You may need to move to Leopard for support.
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL889
It also may be that headphone support is limited to iChat or the like in Tiger.....
If you go to a USB BT dongle, D-Link often gets the nod as having native compatibility in OS X.

I have a IMAC 65 version 10.4.11 2 ghz processor and 1 gb ddr sdram for memory. I am trying to update it to 10.5 version so i can update itunes. i have a new ipod nano

I have a IMAC 65 version 10.4.11 with 2 GHz processor and 1 GB DDR SDRAM of memory. I am trying to download the 10.5 update so I can update my itunes and install a new IPOD Nano and IPAD2 i recently purchased. Any suggestions.

*Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard installation system requirements*
http://support.apple.com/kb/TA24950
Leopard is no longer available at the Apple Store *but may be available by calling Apple Phone Sales @ 1-800-MY-APPLE (1-800-692-7753)*.
Installing Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1544
Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard Installation and Setup Guide
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/leopard_install-setup.pdf
After you install the base 10.5, download & install the 10.5.8 combo update at http://support.apple.com/downloads/Mac_OS_X_10_5_8_Combo_Update
 Cheers, Tom

I have a MacBook Pro2,2 with an Intel Core 2 Duo , 2.33 GHz processor speed and am running OS X 10.4.11 and am having trouble finding which operating system update my computer will support?

have a MacBook Pro2,2 with an Intel Core 2 Duo , 2.33 GHz processor speed and am running OS X 10.4.11 and am having trouble finding which operating system update my computer will support. Any advice?

Mac OS X 10.7.5, which requires getting a Mac OS X 10.6 DVD from the online Apple Store and a download code for 10.7 by phoning them.
(73160)

Can the MacBook Pro 15" Retina with 2.0 GHz processor handle editing high-quality videos?

Will the 2.0 GHz processor version be able to handle editing/exporting high-quality videos?

Welcome to Apple Support Communities
The processor can handle HD video editing without any issue, but the problem comes with the GPU, the Intel Iris Pro GPU.
That GPU is a bit better than the Intel Iris GPU included in the 13-inch MacBook Pro, but it is still not good enough for serious video editing. If you make videos as a hobby or it is not an important task for you, the MacBook Pro with the Intel Iris Pro GPU may be enough, because it works with HD vide editing. However, if you need the best performance, you need to go for the most expensive MacBook Pro, that comes with a NVIDIA GPU

I have the macbook pro 13" retina display. Can I upgrade my 8gb ram to 16gb? my processor is 2.5Ghz intel core i5

i have the macbook pro 13" retina display. Can I upgrade my 8gb ram to 16gb? my processor is 2.5Ghz intel core i5

To save space on the computer, Apple has decided to solder the memory onto the logic board on the MacBook Pro with Retina display and the MacBook Air, and that's why you can't add more memory after buying the Mac. This only applies to these computers, not for the other ones

I have a 2007 black MacBook and upgraded the HD to 500gb. Now the processor lags. Any suggestions?

I have a 2007 black MacBook and upgraded the HD to 500gb. Now the processor lags. Any suggestions?

Assume you haven't filled up your new hard drive, so it should have plenty of space. You didn't say what you're running when it lags, however, hard to connect new hard drive to causing processor lags. See this FAQ on OS X performance to see what can help.

Should I buy the new (early 2009) iMac 2.93 GHz or 3.06 GHz processor?

The heavier applications I'll be using are Final Cut Studio and Photoshop/Illustrator (not so much for video games).
Would there be a significant difference between the 2.93 GHz processor and the 3.06 GHz one? If so, where/when/how will I notice it?
I'm already planning on the ATI 4850 graphics card. The only thing I don't know enough about is the processor.
Thank you!

Snow Leopard aims to change this, but as far as I know, only the CPU is involved in decoding/encoding video/audio, editing photos, etc. I would assume that 3D apps use the GPU to help with the rendering process, but this is an assumption and not based on experience (they could just as likely use the CPU only). The GPU is used for drawing your screen. In a game, it's critical. Running "productivity" apps, however, the GPU is largely unused. Snow Leopard will supposedly implement a system that allows the OS to pass information to the GPU to be processing, using some of those unused cycles. Whether this happens or not remains to be seen.

HT2452 Is it possible to upgrade this IMAC to an Intel Core i7 Processor (2600K 4x3.40GHz) ?

Is it possible to upgrade this IMAC to an Intel Core i7 Processor (2600K 4x3.40GHz) ?

Technically, it is possible.
You can upgrade the processor. I just upgraded mine earlier today.
I took me about 5 hours and voided whatever little warranty I had left.
The iMacs are standard Intel socket 1155.
As long as your TDP and Architecture is the same, they will work in 27".
Since you have the 2009 27" (as do I, just finished upgrading mine!) the absolute quickest you can go is a Core i7 880.
If you want a guide, HardMac has one.
Everymac has more info on the topic.
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/imac-aluminum-faq/imac-intel-aluminum -processor-upgrade-instructions.html
Should give you all the info you need.
Good luck!

Upgrading to 3.0 or 3.2 GHz processors - is it worth it?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for