Upgrading to 9.2 Path!

I was unable to upgrade to 9.2 from 9.0 with slipstreaming as per Adobe's site. Then I found this post on another site. It worked like a charm. Do Not Apply 9.1.3 patch. It would be nice if Adobe would update their website.
This document would be relevant if they had updated it when 9.2 came out. But they haven't yet.
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/498/cpsid_49880.html
After a bit of trial and error, this is the order you must patch to get 9.2 into your AIP:
9.0 -> 9.1.0
9.1.0 -> 9.1.2
9.1.2 -> 9.2.0
If you already have 9.1.3 in your AIP, you'll have to create a new AIP from the original source.

If you're applying all the patches in the right order per the AIP doc (no quarterly's over security patches: see http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/837/cpsid_83708.html for ID), then please describe the exact steps to reproduce what you call a bug and the result.
thanks,
Ben

Similar Messages

ITunes 7 upgrade fails: The folder path 'C:' contains an invalid character

I see this message when I try to upgrade to ITunes 7.
The path selected is C:\\Program Files\iTunes (the default one).
Also tried to manually browse to this directory, in case something was wrong with default path.
Also tried running Registry Mechanic in case there were strange characters in any of my registry settings.
Nothing helps.
c

C:\Documents and Settings\somename\Local Settings\Temp\QTInstallCode.log shows this:
QuickTimePreInstallProc Enter
Moving QTPrefs file (if necesary) to new location...
Getting QT preinstall info...
Getting QT process count...
Ignoring process 'ZCfgSvc.exe' as possible QT process...
Module using "QuickTime.qts": "QuickTime.qts"
Process using QT: "iTunes.exe"
Current QT processes = 1
Ignoring process 'ZCfgSvc.exe' as possible QT process...
Module using "QuickTime.qts": "QuickTime.qts"
Process using QT: "iTunes.exe"
Current QT processes (again) = 1
Current QT processes still > 0
Will check for QT version: 7.1.3.100
QT DLL path: "C:\Program Files\QuickTime\QTSystem\QuickTime.qts"
Installed QT DLL "QuickTime.qts", version = 7.1.0.210
GetQTInstallInfo: Older QuickTime installed
GetQTInstallInfo: is QTPro - no, upgrade would invalidate - no
Final result: 3 (error=0)
QuickTimePreInstallProc Exit (error=0)

When can we expect upgrade and/or maintenance path to 12.2 ?

Hello,
it's been a while since EBS 12.2. has been made available. When can we expect Maintenance Wizard to support upgrade and maintenance to this target version ?
Thanks, Jiri

Please check MOS Note
Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.2 Information Center - Upgrade (Doc ID 1583158.1)

Upgrade path 11.5.9 to R12.1.3..??

Hi All,
Our Current Environment.
OS : RHEL 4 update 8 (32 bit)
EBS Version : 11.5.9
Database :9.2.0.8
We are planning to upgrade EBS from 11.5.9 to R12.1.3. Is below path is corerect.
*Upgrade database from 9.2.0.8 to 11.1.0.7
*lay down R12.1.1 file system
* Apply R12.1.1 upgrade driver
Please help with your suggestions.
Thanks
RB
Edited by: R12DBA on May 18, 2011 10:17 PM

We are planning to upgrade EBS from 11.5.9 to R12.1.3. Is below path is corerect.
*Upgrade database from 9.2.0.8 to 11.1.0.7
*lay down R12.1.1 file system
* Apply R12.1.1 upgrade driver
Please help with your suggestions.Please refer to (Database Preparation Guidelines for an E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 Upgrade [ID 761570.1]), Path A
Oracle Applications Upgrade Guide: Release 11i to Release 12.1.1
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B53825_03/current/acrobat/121upgrade.pdf
Please note that 11i/R12 is certified with 11gR1/11gR2
Interoperability Notes Oracle EBS 11i with Oracle Database 11gR2 (11.2.0.1) [ID 1265268.1]
Interoperability Notes Oracle EBS 11i with Oracle Database 11gR2 (11.2.0.2) [ID 881505.1]
Interoperability Notes Oracle EBS R12 with Oracle Database 11gR2 (11.2.0.1) [ID 1265232.1
Interoperability Notes EBS R12 with Database 11gR2 [ID 1058763.1]
And, if you want to upgrade to 12.1.3, please refer to:
Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.3 Now Available
http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/ebs_1213_available
Thanks,
Hussein
Thanks,
Hussein

ASA Firewall Upgrade from 8.2,8.4, to 9.0

Dear All ,
we have five firewalls with the following details:
First Firewall
Hardware:   ASA5550, 4096 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 4 3000 MHz, Flash 256MB , BIOS Flash1024KB , ASA IOS 8.4(3) ,Device Manager Version 6.4(7)
    my question can i upgrade ASA IOS 8.4(3) to 9.0 directly without any issues also can i upgrade Device manager 6.4(7) to 7.0 without upgrading the       ASA IOS itself
Second Firewall
Hardware:   ASA5520,2048 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 4 2000MHz, Flash 256MB , BIOS Flash1024KB , ASA IOS 8.2(3) ,Device Manager Version
6.2(3)
my question can i upgrade ASA IOS 8.2(3) to 9.0 directly without any issues also can i upgrade Device manager 6.2(3) to 7.0 without upgrading the       ASA IOS itself
Third Firewall
Hardware:   ASA5520,2048 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 4 2000MHz, Flash 256MB , BIOS Flash1024KB , ASA IOS 8.4(3) ,Device Manager Version 6.4(7)
my question can i upgrade ASA IOS 8.4(3) to 9.0 directly without any issues also can i upgrade Device manager 6.4(7) to 7.0 without upgrading the       ASA IOS itself
Fourth Firewall
Hardware:   ASA5520,2048 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 4 2000MHz, Flash 256MB , BIOS Flash1024KB , ASA IOS 8.4(3) ,Device Manager Version 6.4(7)
my question can i upgrade ASA IOS 8.4(3) to 9.0 directly without any issues also can i upgrade Device manager 6.4(7) to 7.0 without upgrading the       ASA IOS itself
fifth Firewall:
Hardware:   ASA5520,2048 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 4 2000MHz, Flash 256MB , BIOS Flash1024KB , ASA IOS 8.2(3) ,Device Manager Version 6.2(3)
my question can i upgrade ASA IOS 8.2(3) to 9.0 directly without any issues also can i upgrade Device manager 6.2(3) to 7.0 without upgrading the       ASA IOS itself
please help i am doing the upgrading remotely using the ASDM and i don't want to do any upgrade could result disconnectivity.
Best regards

Hi Basel,
Honestly, I wouldn't suggest a direct upgrade from 8.2 to 9.0. This is a *major* upgrade. The recommended path to reach 9.0 would be from 8.2-->8.4-->9.0
Here are the release notes for 9.0:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa90/release/notes/asarn90.html#wp690047
Per above document:
If you are upgrading from a pre-8.3 release, see also the Cisco ASA 5500 Migration Guide to Version 8.3 and Later
for important information about migrating your configuration.
Once you are on 8.3/8.4 (I would suggest 8.4 as a lot of issues were fixed post 8.3 as that was a huge transition from 8.2) upgrade to 9.0 is fairly simple.
Major part is upgrade from 8.2 to 8.4 as configuration changes and few things can be broken as a result. I would highly recommend you to check these docs before attempting an upgrade and also do it with some maintenence window so as to correct things in case they broke:
Following doc talks about 8.3 but it is applicable to direct upgrade to 8.4 as well:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12690
Release notes for 8.4:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa84/release/notes/asarn84.html
Sourav

DVD drive won't recognise 10.4 upgrade disc.

Our lovely old G4 comes with a DVD drive - no burner, but the reader is in there. I can play DVDs just fine; but it's (finally) time to update from 10.1. I have an upgrade disc for a previously overwritten update on a different mac and figured I'd use that.
The DVD drive gets quite confused by the system DVD, either trying to reformat it for burning, trying to play it like a movie, or just refusing to acknowledge that there's a disc present.
I've tried everything I can think of to make this work, and no results so far.

There should be some build information, even System Profiler
often will have some hardware information handy in finding out
what the stuff in the box really is. Some of the computer models
have some model configuration information on the outside of
the computer, written on the bottom or back. Others may have
such info & it isn't easy to find, or it says little more than basics.
A full retail installer disc and not some upgrade disc is a path;
the other disc may be for a specific model and won't put a
full system if anything, into the computer at hand. The optical
drive in the computer may support DVD installer (read only)
discs if they are universal full retail type. MacTracker will say
some info about what configuration within a series may have
had what kind of optical drive. Yours may also have a simple
defect and that may prevent a full installer from booting.
{Startup from a DVD media install disc is the same as from CD,
the C -key is held on startup to see if or when it will load and
then the Installer screens will appear; if it is a correct disc.}
In a series, and in older computers it is more noticeable, the
lower-end configuration may have offered a CD-ROM drive
and it can boot the computer from a CD system install disc;
further up the food-chain, the next-up one could record to CD
media and play CDs, boot from CD. Later on, the Combo
drive could boot from some DVD media, play DVDs, may
have included system software on CDs in a packet. And later
ones with a Combo, had OS media on DVD and booted from
it to perform installs, disk maintenance, and other tasks. The
last configuration is a DVD write/read drive, a superdrive, &
can also handle CD write/read; boots Mac with DVD installer.
The specifications can sometimes also be found for older
Macs in Apple Support's specification page. Some specs
and other related information may be found in the download
from MacTracker which runs free as an app, from their web
page, at http://mactracker.ca and this may help generally.
There is some information on OS X system discs and also
computer specifications, supported systems, etc from there.
Some "upgrade discs" require a certain version of OS X
to be installed prior to being able to use that disc. It may
not be a full installer at all, and is simply an upgrade over
some earlier system; in some cases these may also be
for a specific computer series and not a universal retail
type of full installer disc; so they should be avoided.
{An "upgrade" disc may have been meant for a computer
already running some version of a previous OS and may
have been put in the box as an easy path for that owner
to get into the next OSX version without a full retail buy.
In some instances, those may be only good as coasters.}
Good luck & happy computing!
edited.

10.4.8 (and any other system upgrade) - Safe Mode?

It has recently been suggested to me that in addition to the repair permissions before and after, verify disc, unplug all externals, and use the Combo routine, that booting into safe mode to do any system upgrade is the preferred path since there's less chance of issues arising afterwards. Can someone advise on whether this is the preferred method, or would a safe mode upgrade (in this case to 10.4.8) present additional potential problems?
Also, I'm on an Airport (dual ethernet) network here at work (I'm the admin to all the computers - all G4 PPCs) and we need our network. Is 10.4.8 safe for an Airport network? I've seen some rumblings.

I've never heard or seen it is preferred to install updates after starting up in Safe Mode. Doing so is for troubleshooting purposes only so I'm not sure this is a good idea.
Check this link for recommendations.
http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/installswupdates.html
I use an Airport Express for my wireless network and I experienced no problems after installing the 10.4.8 update. I've noticed a speed improvement when browsing.

Upgrade Tomcat From 4.1 To 5.5

I've got a Solaris 10 (8/07) installation that has come with Tomcat 4.1 as a default. We are in the process or writing our own web service that will use Tomcat. However I've been told by our developer that I must upgrade Tomcat to the latest (5.5.29 I think). Can someone tell me how to do this. Is there an option to upgrade automatically via the web or do i have to follow a distinct upgrade step by step path?
TIA.

You have posted your question in the wrong forum.
none-the-less --- you seem to need to upgrade to a specific version of tomcat, the latest 5.x.
You should download the version you need from http://tomcat.apache.org/
wget http://apache.cyberuse.com/tomcat/tomcat-5/v5.5.29/bin/apache-tomcat-5.5.29.tar.gz
cd /your/install/directory
unpack it with "tar zxvf apache-tomcat-5.5.29.tar.gz"
That is it for installation.
You will have to configure it, which you will have to figure out on your own, ask for help from your developer, or post your questions to a tomcat forum, or subscribe to tomcat-users mail list <[email protected]>
-RG

Upgrading from APEX 3.1.0.00.32 to APEX 3.1.1.00.09 fails

installing for APEX 3.1.0.00.32 to APEX 3.1.1.00.09 fails:
due to a migration table existing.
Oracle platform 10G XE on windows XP2

Hello Jason,
Thanks on your reply.
>> The full distribution of 3.1.1 will not patch 3.1. Trying to run the full installation of 3.1.1 on top of 3.1 will result in an error
I just want to be sure I understand you correctly. A user with an active 3.1 instance, who wants to use the 3.1.1 version, but don’t have access to the patch, must export all his/her applications, remove the current 3.1 instance, install 3.1.1 using the full installation distribution, and import back all the applications?
While we at it, what about pre 3.1 versions? The full 3.1.1 version will upgrade them or the path is to first upgrade to 3.1 and then apply the patch?
Thanks,
Arie.

Upgrade 5510 ASA 7.0(7) ADSM 5.0(7)

I'm doing an upgrade this weekend, and a bit out of my realm at the moment.
I have a 5510 running ASA 7.0(7) ADSM 5.0(7), and I'm not sure what I need to upgrade to, or what path to take.
The ASA 5510 only has 256mb of RAM in it, so I see 8.3 is out of the picture.
I would greatly appreciate it if someone would tell me what versions to aim for, and what the path I need to take is. I read someplace that I had to increment 5.0 > 5.1 > 5.2 etc, and am somewhat confused.
Thank you very much.
Jim

I finally got comfortable stumbling around cisco.com, and it looks like I'm answering my own questions.
With only have 256mb of RAM, and well over 20% free, 8.2 will work.
For the ASA 5510—Version 8.2 uses more base memory than previous releases, which might cause problems for some ASA 5510 users who are currently running low on free memory (as indicated in the
show memory
output). If your current
show memory output displays less than 20% free, we recommend upgrading the memory on the ASA 5510 from 256 MB to 1 GB before proceeding with the release 8.2 upgrade.For the ASA 5510—Version 8.2 uses more base memory than previous releases, which might cause problems for some ASA 5510 users who are currently running low on free memory (as indicated in the show memory output). If your current show memory output displays less than 20% free, we recommend upgrading the memory on the ASA 5510 from 256 MB to 1 GB before proceeding with the release 8.2 upgrade.
And for an upgrade path:
To ensure that your configuration updates correctly, you must upgrade to each major release in turn. Therefore, to upgrade from Version 7.0 to Version 8.2, first upgrade from 7.0 to 7.1, then from 7.1 to 7.2, and finally from Version 7.2 to Version 8.2 (8.1 was only available on the ASA 5580).

Pen Tool Multiple Path Selection

Just upgraded to CC 2014. I frequently remove photo backgrounds by creating paths with the pen tool. I have always been able to create multiple paths for areas that I want to delete using the pen tool, then upon completion, right click, choose "Make Selection" and then delete all the areas at once. Since upgrading, only the last path region is selected using this method and the other areas disappear. Any help would be greatly appreciated, have been going crazy trying to figure this out.

That particular aspect should work the same as previous versions. When you make the first path, click outside that path in the Paths panel, and then click back on it. You only need to do this if you have left the previous path open (not closed it by joining the two ends.
Continue using the pen tool and the new path segments will be there in the same path.
You need to be aware of the Pen tool options, like Combine, Subtract, Intersect.
If you use that path for making a selection for instance, and then use the Pen tool again, you will lose the first path. A quick and easy way to save paths is to drag them to the New Path icon at the bottom of the Paths panel.
This graphic might be of help.

Upgrading EBS from 11.5.10.2(11.2.0.2 database) to R12.1.3

Hello,
we are running EBS 11.5.10.2 with 11.2.0.2 database. Now we are planing to upgrade only application from 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.3.
Are there any issues in upgrading application from 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.3 , I heard that we can not upgrade application to R12.1.3 with 11.2.0.2 ,is it true.
Regards

As mentioned above, there should be no issues in upgrading 11i with 11gR2 instance to R12.
Please also see (Database Preparation Guidelines for an E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 Upgrade [ID 761570.1]), Path E.
Please note that you have to upgrade to 12.1.1 first then upgrade to 12.1.3
Oracle Applications Upgrade Guide: Release 11i to Release 12.1.1
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B53825_03/current/acrobat/121upgrade.pdf
Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.3 Now Available
http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/2010/08/ebs_1213_available.html
Re: Upgrade EBS 11.5.10 to 12.1.3 on Multi-Node Sun Solaris Sparc 64 bit
Thanks,
Hussein

SAP ECC 6 Upgrade to 2008 R2 and Virtualization success/failure stories

Hi Sap community,
I'm planning the following upgrade on my SAP Ecc 6.0 :
Source CI : physical server on windows 2003 x64 SP2,
Target CI : virtual server under vsphere 5.0 Windows 2008 x64 R2,
Source DB : physical server on windows 2003 x64 SP2, SQL 2005 SP2
Target DB : virtual server on windows 2008 x64 R2, SQL 2008 R2
Target physical boxes are not the same as source..
I've already verified pre-requisites, best practices, upgrade path on notes, forums,etc ..
What I haven't found, are the different experiences (success or failure stories) people had with performances while performing such an upgrade, especially with the path I want to use :
1) P2V the 2 servers
2) Upgrade to W2008 R2
3) Upgrade SQL to SQL 2008 R2
Although technically it works (tested on sandbox) I'm just wondering in a long term and with load, if such a enviroment will run without issues in production.
I know that some of you will advice me to create new clean installs and use "system copy" but I would like to avoid changing my hostnames because of dependencies (with BI, CRM, transport system etc...) UNLESS someone tells me that he experienced the P2V method and lived a nightmare.
My second question would be : for the DB : has someone tested having DB on VMDK disks versus RDM disks.
Thank you
Jorge

Hi,
What I haven't found, are the different experiences (success or failure stories) people had with performances while performing such an upgrade, especially with the path I want to use :
1) P2V the 2 servers
2) Upgrade to W2008 R2
3) Upgrade SQL to SQL 2008 R2
Answer to your above 3 questions : approach has been successful. I had done it at 2 places.
My second question would be : for the DB : has someone tested having DB on VMDK disks versus RDM disks.
Please find more details about VMDK and RDM in the links below. Further more you can have maximum details about your query from the link below.
VMware documents regarding SAP products
Hope this answers all your queries.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

Media Manager 9.6.12 won't run; insists that I "upgrade" to same version, refuses to run

Every time I run Media Manager, an Upgrade window appears with the options to "Quit" or "Upgrade".
I can't use Media Manager because I can't dismiss this upgrade box without selecting one of those two buttons.
- Clicking "Quit" exists the upgrade application and Media Manager completely,
- Clicking "Upgrade" closes Media Manager and launches "Verizon Media Manager-9.6.12 Setup", with the options to Repair or Remove.
I've repaired the installation several times with no errors, but every time Media Manager launches, this process starts again (with the modal Upgrade window). I've completely uninstalled Media Manager (both through the Upgrade app and via Add/Remove Programs) and reinstalled it from a fresh download. I've rebooted at every opportunity along the upgrade and remove/reinstall paths. The results are always the same: double-click Media Manager, it loads, it says I have to upgrade or quit.
I'm running on a fully patched XPsp3 machine. The only other apps on this box are Panda Cloud Antivirus, TRENDnet SecureView (IP camera montior), PerfectDisk (defragger), and an [inactive] installation of Cerberus FTP Server. The machine also serves as a VPN gateway into my home network (via built-in XP services, nothing 3rd party). Besides periodic updates, no programs have been added or removed in at least two years.
The problem likely started sometime within the past few months; I just noticed it I recently when I went to check the PC's status.
Suggestions?

I haven't other reports of this happening. Are you able to successfully install and use it on other machines in the house? It sounds like there is something interacting with it causing problems which we would need to isolate programs one by one to find which is the offending program.
Anthony_VZ
**If someones post has helped you, please acknowledge their assistance by clicking the red thumbs up button to give them Kudos. If you are the original poster and any response gave you your answer, please mark the post that had the answer as the solution**
Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or plan

Zone path location question

I am rebuilding our Zone hosting server and the Zone paths are currently located on the SAN through an iscsi mount. My question is: If I plan to use Live Upgrade should the zone paths be in the root partition instead?
Also, if you have any suggestions about using Live upgrade with non-global zones I would like to hear them as well.
Thanks,
Dave

Which file system you are using?
I have patched several guest ldoms running several zones with Live Upgrade. Every zone's zroot is on separate zpool (because of HA). This way it is quite easy to migrate a single zone to second node (in the event of disaster)
One thing that you should remember is that Live Upgrade with ZFS does the patching by using ZFS snapshot. For example, if you do the patching to a live system (which is supported with Live Upgrade!) and the application running on the zone is storing its data on the same file system where zone's root is, the application's data might be out of date after you reboot the machine using the new BE that was created by Live Upgrade.

Upgrading to 9.2 Path!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for