Upstream switch RSTP Topology changes and AP1210 APs

We have AP1210's trunked to 3550/3560 access switches which are inturn trunked to two wireless core 4006 switches.
RSPT is configured on all switches. When a topology change occurs, RPST is very fast in moving the root port (~1 sec) but the designated edge ports (trunk ports) go through the 30 sec 2 x FD STP cycle before going back to forwarding designated ports.
We do not having spanning tree running on the AP1210s, so no bpdus are sent from the AP and we can't use portfast on the access switch to go straight to forwarding.
A colleague felt there was a reason you don't turn on STP on the AP. We have 2 VLANs/Bridges on each AP.
We're looking to speed up spanning tree convergence. Failover testing shows that the 3550 access switch desginated port does not go into forwarding quickly and WL clients lose pings/streaming audio etc during the convergence delay.
Any inputs welcomed.

Hi Sarbjit-2014 
Thank you for your response, i dont get any traps msg's at all, doing a sh log on the catalyst will not show me those events.
Below is the output of my sh log ,for obvious reasons i have masked the logging host
Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 2 messages rate-limited, 0 flushes,
 0 overruns)
    Console logging: level debugging, 608 messages logged
    Monitor logging: level debugging, 23 messages logged
    Buffer logging: level debugging, 608 messages logged
    Exception Logging: size (4096 bytes)
    Count and timestamp logging messages: disabled
    Trap logging: level notifications, 649 message lines logged
        Logging to x.x.x.x, 560 message lines logged
I also tried to enter the command spanning-tree logging, but it doesnt seem to be available
Thanks 

Similar Messages

  • Topology changed and WAAS caused traffic interuption

    We have 2 sites that connected via point to point circuits.  These sites have 3 WAE's @ each location.  The ingress vlan @ each site of the point to point ciruits is using ip wccp 62 redirect in.  The svi's on the 6500's that house the users/servers have ip wccp 61 redirect in.  Each of these sites have host ports to an MPLS cloud that contains other datacenters that don't currently have WAE's installed.  Normal flow of traffic between those sites is directly to Site A or B, the interface that they enter the core 6500's is the same vlan that contain the 62 redirect.  When all connectivity is good the traffic from one of the sites to either Site A or B is not affected by the waas due to the fact that there isn't a pair involved in the flow.  Yesterday there was a major outage for our MPLS carrier and traffic began to take a path through A to get to B.   Example:
    Client---->SiteA Core 6500 Vlan interface with 62 in---->POINT to POINT----->SiteB Core 6500 Vlan interface with 62 in---Site B SVI with 61 in
    Client could ping resource fine but could't pull up shares or create an ODBC connection.
    From what I can tell Site A does have a "matching" 61 and 62 flow for connection but SiteB does. 
    We are using ACL's for WCCP but not sure they are correct, ie they are the same for both 61 and 62.  From what I understand 61 is based on source address while 62 is base on destination, is this only for load balancing across multiple WAE's?  Does any have a recomendation or thought on why this would have broke during the rerouting of traffic?  I would also like some input on how to utilize the ACL's correctly.  Should each site specific ACL's that are the inverse of each other, ie:
    Site A
    ip access-list extended WAAS_Traffic_61
    permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
    ip access-list extended WAAS_Traffic_62
    permit ip  any 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
    Site B
    ip access-list extended WAAS_Traffic_61
    permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
    ip access-list extended WAAS_Traffic_62
    permit ip  any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
    where 192.168.0.0/24 resides @ Site A and 192.168.1.0/24 resides @ Site B.
    Thanks,
    Joe

    Hi Zach
    I have implement this scenario and WAAS is performing optimization. I only need to optimize two sites that connect trough VPN, so I'm using WCCP only on Server VLAN and VPN VLAN that receive the remote users connections.
    So, when I look to "sh stat conn" I see many PT Asymmetric connections.
    I have disable EPM Accelerator cause I have read about EPM Accelerator does not work with Asymmetric Routing and also cause I had Microsoft access problem with one user VLAN that has WCCP command on it.
    I need enable EPM Accelerator because MAPI accelerator needs it to work fine.
    My doubts are:
    I have many VLANs at Central Site that does not need optimize and that WAE Core are handling. Can I include this networks in a passtrough policy?
    How can I identify the cause of Asymmetric to enable EPM Accelerator? I can see that the same connection is being see in two directions like bellow:
    10.25.48.57:80 172.0.0.59:1973 N/A PT Asymmetric
    172.0.0.59:1973 10.25.48.57:80 N/A PT Asymmetric
    Is it normal I have MS-EndPointMapper between two internals VLANs, that are not in the WAAS path?
    Thanks for help

  • Topology change not propagated to interface

    Hi all,
    Had a requirement that called for a topology change (adding a physical schema to existing data server and updating the logical schema to point to this new physical schema). In the end, this change is meant to eliminate the use of LKM. This affects, say 10 interfaces, which are being executed through a package scenario. Now when I regenerate the scenario after making the topology change and re-execute, I see the interfaces still using the LKM. BUT if I go and open the interfaces, make a minor change (e.g. move a datastore around), save and close them back, regenerate the package scenario and execute it, I can see the changes are there and it's not using the LKM. This is obviously tedious if we have to do it for hundreds of interfaces. Given this, is there anyway to propagate the topology change from the back end to all the interfaces? Maybe an update or something on the repository tables? It's bizarre since when I query the interfaces in the SNP_POP table, I see that I_TRT_KLM column is NULL which presumably means it's not using an LKM so I'm not sure why from the front end, we have to open and close the interfaces to see the change come through.
    Any ideas why?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I believe what each Interface needs is to have the sourceset "recomputed". This is what happens when you open the Interface, click on the mapping tab, then over to the flow tab - which is why, after you save, it works. You should be able to write a Groovy script or Java code using the ODI SDK to handle this in a batch.
    Take a look at the InteractiveInterfaceHelperWithActions class. There is a method to check for dirty sourcesets and another to compute the sourcesets.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E28280_01/apirefs.1111/e17060/index.html?overview-summary.html
    Regards,
    Michael Rainey

  • Frequent MSTP topology changes on SF-300-08 and SG-300-10

    Hi,
    I am trying to configure MSTP on Layer-2 network at work. We have multiple switches connected on Wireless point-to-point links with redundent links.
    MSTP is configured with multiple regions. All the servers are located in RegionA and other regions are connected to RegionA via multiple links.
    There are 3 SG-300-10 switches in RegionA  --- SwitchA_1, SwitchA_2 and SwitchA_3.
    One of the simple regions (RegionB) has a single SF-300-08 switch (SwitchB) connected to SwitchA_2 via port e7 and SwitchA_3 via port e8. Hello Time, Forward Delay and Max Age are at their default values of 2, 15 and 20 respectively. The link between SwitchB (port e7) ---- SwitchA_2 is the primary link with cost 200,000 and the link between SwitchB (port e8) ---- SwitchA_3 is the backup link with cost 500,000.
    The log on SwitchB is shows in the table below. As it is seen from the table there are frequent topology changes for very short duration (1-4 seconds) before the topology settles back to the configured one. (Primary link forwarding and secondary link blocking). During this time there have been no link failures reported.
    Same thing is also observed within RegionA (SwitchA_1, SwitchA_2 and SwitchA_3 are connected to each other).
    How to stop these frequent topology changes? The topology changes within RegionA causes a lot of PPPoE sessions to reset and re-establish.
    Is there any way to find out what triggers these topology changes? Has anyone experienced similar behaviour?
    2147464623
    2011-May-24 13:54:15
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464624
    2011-May-24 13:54:15
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464625
    2011-May-24 13:54:15
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464626
    2011-May-24 13:54:15
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464627
    2011-May-24 13:54:13
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464628
    2011-May-24 13:54:13
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464629
    2011-May-24 13:54:13
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464630
    2011-May-24 13:54:13
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464631
    2011-May-24 12:53:22
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464632
    2011-May-24 12:53:22
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464633
    2011-May-24 12:53:22
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464634
    2011-May-24 12:53:22
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464635
    2011-May-24 12:53:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464636
    2011-May-24 12:53:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464637
    2011-May-24 12:53:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464638
    2011-May-24 12:53:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464639
    2011-May-24 10:56:48
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464640
    2011-May-24 10:56:48
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464641
    2011-May-24 10:56:48
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464642
    2011-May-24 10:56:48
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464643
    2011-May-24 10:56:46
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464644
    2011-May-24 10:56:46
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464645
    2011-May-24 10:56:46
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464646
    2011-May-24 10:56:46
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464647
    2011-May-24 10:35:46
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464648
    2011-May-24 10:35:46
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464649
    2011-May-24 10:35:46
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464650
    2011-May-24 10:35:46
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464651
    2011-May-24 10:35:45
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464652
    2011-May-24 10:35:45
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464653
    2011-May-24 10:35:45
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464654
    2011-May-24 10:35:45
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464655
    2011-May-24 08:52:41
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464656
    2011-May-24 08:52:41
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464657
    2011-May-24 08:52:41
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464658
    2011-May-24 08:52:41
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464659
    2011-May-24 08:52:40
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464660
    2011-May-24 08:52:40
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464661
    2011-May-24 08:52:40
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464662
    2011-May-24 08:52:40
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464663
    2011-May-24 08:04:28
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464664
    2011-May-24 08:04:28
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464665
    2011-May-24 08:04:28
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464666
    2011-May-24 08:04:28
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464667
    2011-May-24 08:04:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464668
    2011-May-24 08:04:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464669
    2011-May-24 08:04:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464670
    2011-May-24 08:04:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464671
    2011-May-24 07:38:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464672
    2011-May-24 07:38:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464673
    2011-May-24 07:38:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464674
    2011-May-24 07:38:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464675
    2011-May-24 07:38:18
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464676
    2011-May-24 07:38:18
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464677
    2011-May-24 07:38:18
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464678
    2011-May-24 07:38:18
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464679
    2011-May-24 06:50:12
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464680
    2011-May-24 06:50:12
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464681
    2011-May-24 06:50:12
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464682
    2011-May-24 06:50:12
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464683
    2011-May-24 06:50:10
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464684
    2011-May-24 06:50:10
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464685
    2011-May-24 06:50:10
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464686
    2011-May-24 06:50:10
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464687
    2011-May-24 06:14:42
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464688
    2011-May-24 06:14:42
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464689
    2011-May-24 06:14:42
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464690
    2011-May-24 06:14:42
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464691
    2011-May-24 06:14:41
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464692
    2011-May-24 06:14:41
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464693
    2011-May-24 06:14:41
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464694
    2011-May-24 06:14:41
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464695
    2011-May-24 06:00:52
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464696
    2011-May-24 06:00:52
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464697
    2011-May-24 06:00:52
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464698
    2011-May-24 06:00:52
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464699
    2011-May-24 06:00:51
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464700
    2011-May-24 06:00:51
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464701
    2011-May-24 06:00:51
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464702
    2011-May-24 06:00:51
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464703
    2011-May-24 05:48:34
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464704
    2011-May-24 05:48:34
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464705
    2011-May-24 05:48:34
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464706
    2011-May-24 05:48:34
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464707
    2011-May-24 05:48:33
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464708
    2011-May-24 05:48:33
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464709
    2011-May-24 05:48:33
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464710
    2011-May-24 05:48:33
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464711
    2011-May-24 05:47:53
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464712
    2011-May-24 05:47:53
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464713
    2011-May-24 05:47:53
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464714
    2011-May-24 05:47:53
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464715
    2011-May-24 05:47:52
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464716
    2011-May-24 05:47:52
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464717
    2011-May-24 05:47:52
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464718
    2011-May-24 05:47:52
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464719
    2011-May-24 04:31:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464720
    2011-May-24 04:31:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464721
    2011-May-24 04:31:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464722
    2011-May-24 04:31:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464723
    2011-May-24 04:31:25
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464724
    2011-May-24 04:31:25
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464725
    2011-May-24 04:31:25
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464726
    2011-May-24 04:31:25
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464727
    2011-May-24 03:24:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464728
    2011-May-24 03:24:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464729
    2011-May-24 03:24:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464730
    2011-May-24 03:24:27
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464731
    2011-May-24 03:24:26
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464732
    2011-May-24 03:24:26
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464733
    2011-May-24 03:24:26
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464734
    2011-May-24 03:24:26
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464735
    2011-May-24 03:16:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464736
    2011-May-24 03:16:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464737
    2011-May-24 03:16:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464738
    2011-May-24 03:16:19
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464739
    2011-May-24 03:16:18
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464740
    2011-May-24 03:16:18
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464741
    2011-May-24 03:16:18
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464742
    2011-May-24 03:16:18
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464743
    2011-May-24 03:11:57
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464744
    2011-May-24 03:11:57
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464745
    2011-May-24 03:11:57
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464746
    2011-May-24 03:11:57
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464747
    2011-May-24 03:11:55
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464748
    2011-May-24 03:11:55
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464749
    2011-May-24 03:11:55
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464750
    2011-May-24 03:11:55
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464751
    2011-May-24 02:52:39
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464752
    2011-May-24 02:52:39
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464753
    2011-May-24 02:52:39
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464754
    2011-May-24 02:52:39
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464755
    2011-May-24 02:52:38
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464756
    2011-May-24 02:52:38
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464757
    2011-May-24 02:52:38
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464758
    2011-May-24 02:52:38
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464759
    2011-May-24 01:29:23
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464760
    2011-May-24 01:29:22
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464761
    2011-May-24 01:29:22
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464762
    2011-May-24 01:29:22
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464763
    2011-May-24 01:29:21
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464764
    2011-May-24 01:29:21
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464765
    2011-May-24 01:29:21
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464766
    2011-May-24 01:29:21
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464767
    2011-May-24 00:41:14
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464768
    2011-May-24 00:41:14
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464769
    2011-May-24 00:41:14
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464770
    2011-May-24 00:41:14
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464771
    2011-May-24 00:41:12
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464772
    2011-May-24 00:41:12
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464773
    2011-May-24 00:41:12
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464774
    2011-May-24 00:41:12
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464775
    2011-May-24 00:14:15
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464776
    2011-May-24 00:14:15
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464777
    2011-May-24 00:14:15
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464778
    2011-May-24 00:14:15
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464779
    2011-May-24 00:14:14
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464780
    2011-May-24 00:14:14
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464781
    2011-May-24 00:14:14
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464782
    2011-May-24 00:14:14
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464783
    2011-May-24 00:13:57
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464784
    2011-May-24 00:13:57
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464785
    2011-May-24 00:13:57
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464786
    2011-May-24 00:13:57
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
    2147464787
    2011-May-24 00:13:56
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
    2147464788
    2011-May-24 00:13:56
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
    2147464789
    2011-May-24 00:13:56
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
    2147464790
    2011-May-24 00:13:56
    Warning
    %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking

    The best way to get this resolved is to open a case with the Support Center and reference this thread. We would need to have a look at your configs to determine the issue. One thing that would likely work is for you to assign a different STP priority on each switch for each STP group.You can open a case by calling the following:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html
    Ivor

  • I'm using windows 7, trying to download pictures from my canon 5d mark 2, but when I click import, the camera does not appear. I've tried changing USB ports, switching the camera on and off, trying a different USB cord, tried a different camera, but nothi

    I'm using windows 7, trying to download pictures from my canon 5d mark 2, but when I click import, the camera does not appear. I've tried changing USB ports, switching the camera on and off, trying a different USB cord, tried a different camera, but nothing. Please help! This problem only started a few days ago on lightroom 3.6, upgraded to 5.5, but still not working. Thanks.

    Can you see the Canon EOS camera and image files using Windows Explorer? If not disconnect the camera, close all applications' shutdown Windows, and TURN OFF the power to your system and ALL connected devices. Disconnect all phones, iPads, and any other USB devices and restart your system.
    Retry Windows Explorer and see if your camera is showing. If so try LR import again.

  • Hi. I tried switching my Apple ID email address to my new email address and I don't know how to switch it for iCloud and iTunes. Please help!! It seems like Apple thinks I have two separate accounts, when I just tried to simply change it!

    Hi. I tried switching my Apple ID email address to my new email address and I don't know how to switch it for iCloud and iTunes. Please help!! It seems like Apple thinks I have two separate accounts, when I just tried to simply change it!

    Settings > Store > Sign Out.
    Sign in with the correct ID.

  • PHONE 5 - switches have not changed the label of 200 euro in Turkey Newborn living in the Republic of Kosovo and no IPstore FCC ID: BCG-E2599A IC: 579C-E2599A IMEI: 013427002320018 MODEL: A1428.  YOU ARE A COMPANY AND THE CORRUPTED ...

    PHONE 5 - switches have not changed the label of 200 euro in Turkey Newborn living in the Republic of Kosovo and no IPstore FCC ID: BCG-E2599A IC: 579C-E2599A IMEI: 013427002320018 MODEL: A1428.
    YOU ARE A COMPANY AND THE CORRUPTED ...

    FCC ID: BCG-E2599A IC: 579C-E2599A IMEI: 013427002320018 MODEL: A1428.
    yes ok bot your Iphone 5 is so so bad my phone dont work  when the mobil is to low batery and off , and after dont work  dont work

  • SG300 Stacking and Powered from POE by Upstream Switch

    Hi Everyone,
    I searched on Google for this unique behavior I discovered on a pair of SG300-28P.
    On a second switch (ver 1.2.7.76) when I unplugged the power cord, to my amazement the switch turned right back on (about 1 second later), with the power cord removed. To verify that the power is indeed coming from POE, the upstream switch (ver 1.1.2.0) that is the same model (sg-300-28p), shows all 7 Ethernet ports connecting the two drawing from 2700mW, to 3000mW.
    While the second switch is powered from the first over POE, the POE does not work on the second switch to power anything, and the system summary mentions something about "PoE Power Information on Master Unit".
    What kind of mode is this?
    Is this a stacking operation, and is POE on the second switch NOT supposed to work when powered over Ethernet from an upstream switch?
    Thanks!
    Jarrett

    Hi Thomas,
    Thank you for your response, here is a small diagram of the connection between the two switches.
    [GBE 3-1– SG-300-28P]
          | - From Ports 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 16
          |
          |  - (Trunk)
          | - To Ports 1-4, 16-18
    [GBE 4-1– SG-300-28P]
    The show power inline output on both switches:
    GBE3-1
    Port based power-limit mode
    Unit  Power  Nominal Power   Consumed Power   Usage Threshold   Traps
    1     On      180 Watts     81 Watts (45%)         95         Disable
      Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
      gi1                               Auto            On        low     class0
      gi2                               Auto        Searching     low     class0
      gi3                               Auto        Searching     low     class0
      gi4                               Auto            On        low     class0
      gi5                               Auto            On        low     class0
      gi6                               Auto        Searching     low     class0
      gi7                               Auto            On        low     class0
      gi8                               Auto            On        low     class0
      gi9                               Auto        Searching     low     class0
      gi10                              Auto            On        low     class3
      gi11                              Auto            On        low     class0
      gi12                              Auto            On        low     class3
      gi13                              Auto            On        low     class0
      gi14                              Auto            On        low     class0
      gi15                              Auto            On        low     class3
      gi16                              Auto            On        low     class0
      gi17                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
      gi18                              Auto            On        low     class0
      gi19                              Auto            On        low     class0
      gi20                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
      gi21                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
      gi22                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
      gi23                              Auto        Searching     low     class0
      gi24                              Auto            On        low     class0
    GBE4-1
    Port based power-limit mode
    Unit  Power  Nominal Power   Consumed Power   Usage Threshold   Traps
    1     On      180 Watts      0 Watts (0%)          95         Disable
      Port      Powered Device         State          Status    Priority   Class
      gi1                               Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi2                               Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi3                               Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi4                               Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi5                               Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi6                               Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi7                               Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi8                               Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi9                               Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi10                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi11                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi12                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi13                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi14                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi15                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi16                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi17                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi18                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi19                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi20                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi21                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi22                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
      gi23                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
       gi24                              Auto          Fault       low     class3
    The picture of the switch powered on while it is unplugged.
    Thank you,
    Jarrett
    http://www.jarrettcadiz.com
    http://www.cloudchase.net/company/jarrettcadiz

  • UCS QoS, VoIP applications and upstream switch

    Hi,
    We have followings:
    Chassis 5108
    FI 6248
    FEX 2208
    Adapter VIC(1240), 2 vNIC for VMData (VoIP applications), a few others vNIC for mgmt, vmotion etc.
    ESXi 5.1
    CUCM, Unity, etc
    For example, CUCM and Unity marked VoIP media as CoS 5 and signaling as 3.
    Will FI overwrite all markings to CoS 5 if VMData vNIC QoS policy is created as platinum with host control FULL (see picture)?
    In other words, will the upstream switch see the same QoS markings from VoIP applications?
    Thanks,
    Harry

    Hello Harry,
    Here is a good link ondesign recommendations on QoS + UC ( VoIP apps ) + UCS
    http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/QoS_Design_Considerations_for_Virtual_UC_with_UCS#Guidelines_for_Physical_LAN_Links.2C_Trunking_and_Traffic_Sizing
    HTH
    Padma

  • Iphone got switched to new zealand and I changed it back to US in my itunes but phone store still says NZ!! Help!!

    iphone got switched to new zealand and I changed it back to US in my itunes but phone store still says NZ!! Help!!
    I don't know how it got switched but I'm trying to update apps and it says my ID isn't valid in NZ, to switch back but of course it doesn't tell me HOW.
    I went into ITUNES and checked USA and synced my phone, tried again and still get the NZ warning. What am I missing here? How do I switch the PHONE back to USA store????

    On your phone:
    Settings > iTunes & App Stores > Apple ID: > View Apple ID > Country/Region...change here.

  • Spanning Tree Topology Changes notifications

    Hello All,
    I've configured RSTP in one of our branch divisions because we decided to add a backup wireless bridge in case one of our fibers gets cut out. Everything is working great , i am getting the desired result, however, i wanted to also syslog the trap msg when a topology change occurs and send it by email. The problem is, i cannot get the root switch to log such an event. 
    The root switch is a Catalyst 6509, i have tried every level of logging possible, to no avail. I know the trap msg is a notice so i have set my logging to informational, but no change.
    I know on c3560's and 3750 i can define to log spanning-tree events, and on my lab setup i do get the trap msgs to my syslog server and email.
    What am i missing?! How can i have my Root switch send me that syslog msg?
    I do appreciate your help
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Sarbjit-2014 
    Thank you for your response, i dont get any traps msg's at all, doing a sh log on the catalyst will not show me those events.
    Below is the output of my sh log ,for obvious reasons i have masked the logging host
    Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 2 messages rate-limited, 0 flushes,
     0 overruns)
        Console logging: level debugging, 608 messages logged
        Monitor logging: level debugging, 23 messages logged
        Buffer logging: level debugging, 608 messages logged
        Exception Logging: size (4096 bytes)
        Count and timestamp logging messages: disabled
        Trap logging: level notifications, 649 message lines logged
            Logging to x.x.x.x, 560 message lines logged
    I also tried to enter the command spanning-tree logging, but it doesnt seem to be available
    Thanks 

  • STP Topology Changes

    All,
    I'm experiencing some oddities with STP on my network. I run the sh spanning-tree detail | inc from|exec|changes on my STP Root Bridge and I'm seeing A LOT of topology changes on a couple of my VLAN's. Here is an example...
     VLAN0160 is executing the rstp compatible Spanning Tree protocol
      Number of topology changes 14411 last change occurred 00:11:38 ago
              from GigabitEthernet2/13
    First, I want to make sure I'm interpreting this output correctly. The output is stating there was 14411 changes 11 minutes ago? Is this value reset after an interval of time? How often is this polled?
    Second, the VLAN's that are seeing this kind of activity are geographically dispersed but connect to same VPLS, Metro-E WAN. Could that cause anything? I know this type of WAN is viewed as one broadcast domain but I have everything segemented real well and nothing "bleeds" over to another location.
    Lastly, What would cause this amount of topology changes? What would be "normal" in a stable network? What would be the best way to approach this to find the root cause?
    Thanks!

    This is telling you who caused it last and it g2/13 .  Whats on that port ?  If its just user on the port do you have portfast turned on ?  If it's not then that will cause a topology change everytime the user goes on and off the network.  In a normal stable network you should see very few . Make sure all the user ports  are configured correctly across your switches.

  • I switched on my PC and there was an update for realplayer. Since then firefox will not load. It is running according to Task Manager. I've downloaded a another copy of the programme using IE but whilst it loaded as a programme, does not open a window.

    I switched on my PC and there was an update for realplayer. Since then firefox will not open as a window. It is running according to Task Manager. I've downloaded a another copy of the programme using IE but whilst it loaded as a programme, does not open a window.

    Hi again,
    Helps if I give the correct link ! <br/>The press shift button appears to still work, but the option to start in safe mode from the programs listing of a standard install I do not think exists anymore.
    Safe mode will start from a command line, (or a shortcut) and in some circumstances you may need to enter the full path name on a command or shortcut detailed instructions are at http://kb.mozillazine.org/Safe_mode
    Remember (at least at this stage) do not make changes when you get the options list, just click on the continue button.
    If you think that RealPlayer is causing the problem you could uninstall that for now.
    Firefox recent versions are 3.6 4.0 (and 5.0 in beta). There is some debate as to whether creating new profiles or re-installing Firefox is the simplest method of troubleshooting and solving some of these problems, personally I use multiple profiles and multiple versions of Firefox, and tend to forget the required procedures are less than straightforward. For now at least try [[safe mode]] again.
    * see also Instructions for [[installing a previous version of firefox]]

  • My iphone 5 broke so had to get a sim card and put it in my husbands old iphone 4. i can not figure out how to get my imformation on this his old phone; contacts, apps ect. i have switched my icloud account and apple id on the phone but nothing. HELP!

    My iphone 5 broke so had to get a sim card and put it in my husbands old iphone 4. i can not figure out how to get my imformation on this his old phone; contacts, apps ect. i have switched my icloud account and apple id on the phone but nothing has changed. please HELP!

    You do a restore as new to wipe the iPhone then at the end of restore you will be asked to restore from backup. Choose your iPhone backup.
    Note you cannot restore an IOS newer than the IOS on iPhone, you need to update iPhone first.

  • When i double click on Mac HD the view has changed and my user name is no longer listed on the left. How can I reset this

    When i double click on Mac HD the view has changed and my user name is no longer listed on the left. How can I reset this?

    Do a factory reset .. nothing will be deleted from your backups and you will be able to get access to them again.
    The Factory Reset Gen1-4.
    Unplug your TC. Hold in reset. and power the TC back on.. without releasing reset for about 10sec. When the status light flashes rapidly; release it.
    Be Gentle! Feel the switch click on. It has a positive feel..  add no more pressure after that.
    TC will reboot after a couple of minutes with default factory settings and will wipe out previous configurations.
    No files are deleted on the hard disk.. No reset of the TC deletes files.. to do that you use erase from the airport utility.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is anyone having problems with iPhone 5 not vibrating properly when receiving calls? It seems to vibrate once and stops?

    When receiving a call, my phone only vibrates once even if its on silent or not. I have checked all the settings and all appears ok. It works sometimes and doesn't other times. Does anyone know how this can be fixed? Thanks

  • HT1454 iphone 4, composite cable no longer works with ios6 update

    I have the iphone 4, and I used an apple composite cable to watch youtube, videos, etc on my TV through an AV input. But when I upgraded from IOS 4 to IOS 6, it no longer works. Says something along the lines of "accessory not supported" or close to

  • Call into an MGCP controlled FXO port not connecting

    my setup is PSTN --- GW --- CUCM --- 6921 phone when we call from the PSTN then call rings and shows connected on the PSTN phone after about 10 sec the call disconnects with fast busy but the 4 digit plar does not ring at all, outgoing calls are work

  • XML select issue strangeness - pro*c

    I've had a pro*c problem that I can't figure out. Hopefully, one of you might be able to do so. I am trying to create a XML output from a select statement. I having several problems, but the first one is that I can't get a simple XMLElement to work.

  • Prepopulate multi-valued filed

    Hello, I configured Oracle Indentity Manager Connector for Oracle e-Business User Management. The eBusiness Suite User form has a child form for responsibilities. I what to prepopulate multiple responsibilities based on some rules. A solution is to c