Urgent :conversion lock problem

Hi All,
I tried to change the existing info object.while activating it again .It is showing a conversion lock infront of teh tecnical name of teh info object with status one.
Kindly tell me the way to release that lock.
regards,
Sonika

it may be normal to wait a bit if your object has many records...
When deleting an attribute, the system needs to adjust the underlying tables.
In reality the DB move the original table to a temp table, delete the fileds on the original table and move the data from the temp table back to the original...
The more data your have, the more it will take time.
You can check your system processes in SM66 in order to verify that.
If nothing is running then try the following:
in RSD1 tab master data / texts
double click in the master data tab (/BIC/P% or /BI0/P% table)
Menu Utilities / database utilities
Check the status of the table: is it active or not?
-If not then click on Activate and adjust database (with SAVE DATA!!!!)
-if yes then go back and perform the same with the SID table attr (/BIC/X% or /BI0/X% table)
Let me know how it goes
Olivier.

Similar Messages

Dead lock problem occur in Ms-Sql Server

Hi friends,
I am using the 1,Tomcat server
2, jdbc-odbc-bridge driver
In my applicaiton .mutli user access time its throw -deadlock
exception . How to solve the dead lock problem.. please help it.
Can i modify the Db connection?
please help me .... How solve the dead lock problem..
please ............ its urgent

I am using this stored procedure to occur dead lock condtion. Orderly insert table values ..
Imm_tblGameTransactions- Primary Tables
Imm_tblGameDetailsBJ - Secondary tables
Please check it.....
Please explain breifly..... ....
please.........
CREATE procedure IMM_BJDeal
 @plid int,
 @gameid int,
 @betamt money,
 @bal money,
 @winamt money,
 @usercards nvarchar(500),
 @dealercards nvarchar(500),
 @useracecnt int,
 @dealeracecnt int,
 @dealerbj int,
 @userbj int,
 @insurance int,
 @split int,
 @push int,
 @sessionid int,
 @ltransid int out
as
 begin
 declare
 @transdate datetime,
 @linitbal money,
 @lfinalbal money,
 @errormesg varchar(50)
 select @linitbal=balance from Imm_players.dbo.Imm_tblPlayerbalance where playerid=@plid
 select @transdate=getdate()
 --set @ldealcards ='['+@dealercard1+','+@dealercard2+']'
 --print @ldealcards
 if(@userbj=1)
 begin
 select @lfinalbal= @bal
 begin transaction
 insert into Imm_tblGameTransactions
 (playerid,gameid,Initialbalance,transactiondate,betamount,winamount,currencycode,finalbalance,sessionid)
 values(@plid,@gameid,@linitbal,@transdate,@betamt,@winamt,'USD',@lfinalbal,@sessionid)
 IF @@ERROR <> 0
 Begin
 -- There's an error b/c @ERROR is not 0, rollback
 ROLLBACK
 return
 End
 select @ltransid=@@identity from Imm_tblGameTransactions
 insert into Imm_tblGameDetailsBJ(transid,playercard,dealercard,typeid,result,statusid,split,insurance,playercardcount,dealercardcount,winvalue,betvalue)
 values(@ltransid,@usercards,@dealercards ,1,1,'PB',@split,@insurance,@useracecnt,@dealeracecnt,@winamt,@betamt)
 IF @@ERROR <> 0
 begin
 -- There's an error b/c @ERROR is not 0, rollback
 ROLLBACK
 return
 end
 update Imm_players.dbo.Imm_tblPlayerbalance set balance=@lfinalbal where playerid=@plid
 IF @@ERROR <> 0
 begin
 -- There's an error b/c @ERROR is not 0, rollback
 ROLLBACK
 return
 end
 commit transaction
 return
 end
 else
 begin
 begin transaction
 insert into Imm_tblGameTransactions(playerid,gameid,Initialbalance,transactiondate,betamount,winamount,currencycode,finalbalance,sessionid)
 values(@plid,@gameid,@linitbal,@transdate,@betamt,@winamt,'USD',@bal,@sessionid)
 IF @@ERROR <> 0
 Begin
 -- There's an error b/c @ERROR is not 0, rollback
 ROLLBACK
 return
 End
 /*ELSE
 COMMIT -- Success! Commit the transaction*/
 select @ltransid=@@identity from Imm_tblGameTransactions
 insert into Imm_tblGameDetailsBJ(transid,playercard,dealercard,typeid,result,split,insurance,playercardcount,dealercardcount,winvalue,betvalue,statusid)
 values(@ltransid,@usercards,@dealercards,1,3,@split,@insurance,@useracecnt,@dealeracecnt,@winamt,@betamt,'G')
 IF @@ERROR <> 0
 Begin
 -- There's an error b/c @ERROR is not 0, rollback
 ROLLBACK
 return
 End
 /*ELSE
 COMMIT -- Success! Commit the transaction*/
 commit transaction
 return
 end
end
GO

Conversion lock in infoobject - status 6

Hi,
The below is our scenario.
1.We have an info object A with B as an atribute. we did the developmeents with the info object A in development system and transported to all other system.
2. Now as the business does not want B to be an attribute of A,they asked us to remove B from A.
3. We also removed B from A and tried to activate, it gives an conversion error.
4. We also tried the below soln but no success. SE14 -> Give table name -> Activate and adjust database tabel by deleting data.
5. We even manually removed the conversion lock form the infooject (Extras -> Remove conversion lock )but no success.
6. we also did a where used list of infoobject A, there was only one info object C where A is an attribute. We tried deleting that C Data also but no success.
Can anyone give a solution for the above problem.
Thanks in Advance,
Praveen

Praveen,
I cannot confirm the given information.
I don't have any personal test system to answer you.
The best think to do, if you have any development or test system, try it.
Or ask your administrators for a back-up system if the infoobject is affected.
Or create a "Z" infoobject and see the results.
If i find a better solution, i will tell you.
Regards.
Amine

Remove conversion lock

Hello all
I´m working with BW 7 and I would like to know how remove conversion lock for infoObject
Thanks,
Carmen

Hello Nagesh
InfoObject 0BPARTNER is locked, I can´t change to edit mode, and when I try to activate it, I can see the following error in log transaction (SLG1)
Characteristic 0BPARTNER is blocked by conversion
Message no. R7476
Diagnosis
The conversion of master data tables from characteristic 0BPARTNER is not completed.
System Response
Characteristic 0BPARTNER can not be changed until this conversion has been successfully carried out.
Procedure
Activate characteristic 0BPARTNER. The block will be removed following a successful activation.
The problem is that I can´t activate it.
I read in a post that conversion lock (status 3) can be removed in Extras --> Remove convesion, but I can´t find it.
I´m working wit BW 7.
Thanks and regards.
Carmen

Locking problem in VL02N at the time Post Goods issue

Hi,
We have implemented 2 BADIs to change qty in delivery and in subsequent documents. Once we receive an IDoc with batches, then we need to change subitems qty according to no of batches.
Once IDoc has updated, then PGI will do automatically.
1. LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC - Change qty in delivery (Method SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE)
2. LE_SHP_GOODSMOVEMENT - Change qty in material document.
Now, we have a locking problem at the time of posting.
Please let us know, due to these BADI implementation this problem or any other cause? And provide required to solve this problem.

hi ,
do i need to do step 2....?
i dont think u need step2 ( change qty of MBLNR),bcos ,
say ur Del.qty is 100, now u want to do del. of 50, then just u will change its qty & do PGI ? so whats the need of changing MBLNR.
while doing PGI , program will take changed qty of del. only ?
let me know if i'm wrong.
regards
Prabhu

Forms 6i : Ole Container : Locking problem

We have a form in which user can attach all sorts of documents that are then saved in the database.
Once in a while we have a locking problem; when 2 users try to open the same document, the second one first gets a 'Could not reserve record (2 tries). Keep trying?'. When clicking 'No', the next error message is 'Frm-40501 : unable to reserve record for update or delete', and the form cannot be used anymore. He keeps complaining about the reserved record.
I've been looking into this problem but cannot seem to find a lot of help.
Does anyone have an idea how to solve this locking problem?
I have tried the following things:
* setting the block to locking mode 'Delayed' => we ended up having duplicate records.
* Changing properties of the ole-container (In Place Activation, Inside Out support, ...).
Forms version is 6.0.8.13.0, database 8.0.6.0.0.
Any help is appreciated.

that seems to be a normal locking problem. Do you have tried to work with an ON-LOCK trigger ? (e.g. first to see, when locking will occur, second for implementing an own locking-behaviour, maybe with a SELECT for UPDATE)
Or do you think, that there is something special with your OLE-programming ?
Gerd

Lock Problem while Broadcasting multiple reports using process chains

Hi All,
I am trying to broadcast 10 reports using the process chains using the program for RSRD_START and variants created in the Broadcaster..the Program jobs start fine.But I am facing the error that the RSRA_CA_LOG table is getting locked while trying to broadcast the Reports..Can any help me on how to run the jobs without the locking problem..Suggestions please.
Thanks,
Mike.

Hi,
Thanks for the Inputs and the SAP Notes.
I am trying to broadcast the Reports from the the Bex Analyer and getting this ock error and not the workbooks.
I am also trying to Broadcast the Workbooks also, but could not find the options to Broadcast them. we are in SAP -BW3.5 SP 12, Is it possible to broadcast the workbooks in this Patch level..or do we need to upgrade to achieve this.If so...can any one provide me the proceedure to Broadcast the Workbooks.
Thanks,
Mike.

Activation lock problem!

Hello,
I just got a new iPhone 4s from a friend and I can't get into it because of an activation lock problem. I've already tried to restore it in recovery mode but than I still have to log in to his account. Now i've logged in to his iCloud account and deleted the iPhone using the following instructions:
Sign in to their iCloud account at www.icloud.com/find.
Click All Devices to open a list of devices linked to their account, then select the device to be removed. It should show a gray dot or the word “Offline” next to the device name.
Click "Remove from Account" to remove the device from their account.
But it seems that I have should done the following instructions, because the iPhone wasn't completely erased yet:
Sign in to their iCloud account at www.icloud.com/find.
Click All Devices to open a list of devices linked to their account, then select the device to be removed.
Click the Erase button to erase all content and settings from the device. When prompted, don't enter a phone number or message. Click Next until the device is erased.
When the erase is complete, click "Remove from Account" to remove the device from the account.
The problem is that it's too late for that now, because I already deleted the iPhone from his iCloud... Please help me out here, what can I do to still erase it from iCloud?!
Greets

Were you, by chance, running a beta version of iOS 7 on your phone?
If so, this will be the problem. You will need to log Into the private developers forum athttps://developer.apple.com/support/ios/
If you are not a developer, you will need to seek help by way of your favourite search site.

JavaScript error and CATW record locking problem

Hello,
We're having two problems with ESS (CATW and Personal Information (PZM3)) in EP 6. We have an ITS-R/3 landscape.
The JavaScript problem appears intermittently within Personal Data services (Address, Emergency Contact, ...). The actual error reads "object required" and originates from ITS. A user may be able to click through all the ESS services once fine, but on a second click receive the error. Sometimes they can't use the services at all.
The record locking problem happens in Time Sheet (CATW). Even though a user Saves and Releases the Time Sheet, it remains locked and cannot be approved. Alternatively, some users are experiencing locked records when they try to complete their own time sheets.
I'm not sure if these are related.
Has anyone here seen these problems? Any suggestions are most welcome!
Cheers,
Colleen

The best way to nail down the javascript error would be to use the firefox JavaScript debugger extension plugin and put the breakpoints where the problem occurs.
This will exactly tell you which object it is looking for which is not found. Moreover you might be able to find that when it is working fine as you said. So give that a try and I am sure you will be able to figure out the problem.
To me this mostly looks like at time some .js file is not coming through to the browser... but this is just a wild guess based on the symptoms.

Pessimistic lock problem with Sybase

I am having a problem with performing pessimistic lock
using Toplink and Sybase/HSQLDB.
Code example:
Object o = uow.readObject(...
uow.refreshAndLock(o);
//Change o
uow.commitAndResume();
==========================
I receive an Exception:
Local Exception Stack:
Exception [TOPLINK-4002] (OracleAS TopLink - 10g (9.0.4.2) (Build 040311)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.DatabaseException
Exception Description: java.sql.SQLException: Unexpected token: FOR in statement [SELECT t0.CLASSIDENTIFIER, t0.DB_VERSION, t0.OBJECTID, t1.OBJECTID, t1.NAME, t1.DESCRIPTION, t1.TYPE, t2.OBJECTID, t2.MULTIPLE_SERVERS_POLICY, t2.OUTAGE_POLICY, t2.INCOMING_SCRIPT, t2.OUTGOING_SCRIPT, t2.OUTAGE_SCRIPT FROM ROOT t0, LDAPSERVICE t2, SERVICE t1 WHERE ((t0.OBJECTID = 252) AND (((t2.OBJECTID = t0.OBJECTID) AND (t1.OBJECTID = t0.OBJECTID)) AND (t0.CLASSIDENTIFIER = 'ORM.LdapService'))) [b]FOR UPDATE OF * NOWAIT]
=================
As you can see Toplink is trying to execute illegal statement : "....FOR UPDATE OF * NOWAIT"
Do you have any idea what I'm doing wrong?

Duplicate posting Pessimistic lock problem with Sybase

Locking problem in BPS solution not getting solved using RSPLSE. SEM_BPS_S

Can anyone tell me exactly what "rsplse" offers to solve locking in BPS?
We have made correct selection of characteristics (in our case "costcentre" infoobject) in tab "Lock characteristics" , but still when two people are trying to access (write) data in the same transactional cube against the different cost centres, the system is throwing an error message Cube zIC_ccp is locked by username. (Or if a single person is using the two packages simultaneously using two web sessions , he is getting the same error. )
Our assessment is that he should not be facing this locking problem because cost centres here are acting as a key to different selection as configured in rsplse.
Can anyone tell me how to use parameter SEM_BPS_SAVE_UNLOCK. I want to know t. code and other t . code and other details to execute SEM_BPS_SAVE_UNLOCK.

Hi,
Please check the OSS note 635244.
From the OSS note :
 Notes on SET/GET parameters SEM_BPS_NO_LOCK, SEM_BPS_SAVE_UNLOCK :
These two parameters have nothing to do with the problem described above. They are only designed to facilitate the Customizing process, if users carry out Customizing in t ransaction BPS0 within a project.
SEM_BPS_NO_LOCK: This parameter has the effect that transaction data is not locked at all. Never use this parameter in a production system. As of Support Package 14 for Release 3.1B, parameter SEM_BPS_NO_LOCK is released by an additional switch in table upc_dark2: For this purpose you have to maintain a record with param = ENABLE_NO_LOCK and value = X in table upc_dark2. Only then the system includes parameter SEM_BPS_NO_LOCK. The parameter can then be useful if you want to test functions or the manual planning with 'test data' in Customizing.
SEM_BPS_SAVE_UNLOCK: This parameter only works in transaction BPS0; it has the effect that the system unlocks data (if possible) after it has been saved. Therefore, the system only simulates an exit and reentry in transaction BPS0 with the last active detail application. Therefore, the above parameter can be helpful if many people work on Customizing in transaction BPS0, because objects can be unlocked earlier.
Regards,
Siva.

FCP quicktime conversion export problem

issue exporting still image instead of video
FCP quicktime conversion export problem
within the last 2 weeks i have exported from FCP studio 7.0.3 as quicktime conversion, the settings are:
export as QuickTime Conversion:
> Options> quality> set to Best>
Standard Video Compression Settings
Compression Type: H.264
Motion:
Frame Rate: Current fps
Key Frames: Every 24 frames
check Frame Reordering
Compressor:
Quality: Best
Encodeing: Best (Multi-pass)
Data Rate:
Automatic
Filter… none
Size>
Dimensions:
NTSC 720x486 16:9
>ok
Sound: (don't change anything)
Format: Integer (Little Endian)
Sample rate: 48.000kHz
Sample size: 16-bit
Channels: (L R)
>Export
the results i get a odd. - the video exports fine, except for the beginning titles, instead a still frame image from somewhere else in the video occupies that intro, until the first transition- in this case- dip to white, then the rest of the video is fine. the portion of the beginning that does not show are composed of: livetype text credits in V2 - in which i have done a manual opacity fade up and down - so the livetype text fades in, over matte color solid in V1. in the exported video -i do not see any of this, all i see is a seemingly random still from somewhere else in the video. i can however hear the audio as it is supposed be.
cant figure out why this is happening. anybody know?
i think the livetype files are 1920 x 1080.
my FCP sequence is 720 p
this has only recently started happening and doesn't seem to be consistent.
im wondering if it has to do with the live type files, or the white solid?…
or the conversion settings above?

Alistair
Earlybird is exporting H264 ... the Key Frames setting is determining the GOP length. This value should really be determined based on the complexity of the video, to my understanding, the actual frame rate has no bearing on it. If you have very complex fast moving content then a low Key Frame rate is advisable to ensure good image quality (although it will adversely affect the filesize) whereas if you have slow moving or static content (like an interview subject) then a higher Key Frame rate will still produce a good image but at a smaler filesize. The default of 24 should be pretty much fine as a catchall starting point.
Earlybird
Corrupted render files (and render references) can be a pain because FCP will use those files and references in place of the original media when building the export. And so it should as it does't want to waste time re-rendering sections that are apparently already rendered. Unfortuantely, as noted, if the render file has gone bad and/or starts referencing the wrong media then you'll get these wierd flashes of completely unexpeced and unwanted footage showing up where it shouldn't be. When you trash those files then QT / FCP will just go back and re-reference the original media ... so it's usually a worthwhile step to take just in case thats the problem. The worse case scenario is that it only that doesn't work and you spend some time unecessarily re-rendering.
As to why these files go bad? That I don't know. Why do Preferences get corrupted? That I don't know either but it definitely happens :-(
Cheers
Andy

Article says K8N Neo has SATA frequency locking problem

This article says that the K8N Neo has SATA frequency locking problems when overclocking:
http://www.nforcershq.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1801
First of all, is this true?
And if it is true, do we have a BIOS that fixed this problem.
My drives are PATA right now so I currently don't have any problems but I plan to get SATA drives/adapters soon.
I'm running 240 HTT (1:1) so not having the SATA frequency locked could be an issue.

Well, I´m running HTT 230 now, and I´m always using my Raptor as OS disk. Haven´t had any problems yet (with my disk). It´s connected to s-ata_1. Haven´t tried the other ones.
But sometimes when I boot (200 or 230HTT, doesn´t matter) I get artifacts on the boot screen and in Windows, so I have to restart.
Could it be a partially working AGP-lock? It seems as at works most of the time, but sometimes not... Strange... AGP is set to 66-67MHz

Locking problems... Help me...

I am a novice...
But I have a locking problem..
First, OneRecord A is locked,
Second, OneRecord A is also locked...
Third, OneRecord A is also locked..
But if OneRecord A is unlocked, then First, Second, Third All 3 OneRecord A is awaken...(because of same object....)
so Security exception happen...(because one.getCookie() is different from cookie )
I want to make a program in order...
First, OneRecord A is unlock....
Second, OneRecord A is unlock...
Third, OneRecord A is unlock..
What shoud i do?
Help is appreciated...
I am not a native speakek in English..
Plz...
public long lockRecord(long recNo) throws RecordNotFoundException
 int a = (int)recNo;
 if( a >= vecrecord.size() || a < 0) throw new RecordNotFoundException();
 OneRecord one = ((OneRecord)(vecrecord.elementAt(a)));
 if( one == null) throw new RecordNotFoundException();
 long cookie = 0L;
 synchronized(one)
 if(one.isLocked())
 try
 one.wait();
 catch(Exception e)
 cookie = Thread.currentThread().hashCode();
 one.setCookie(cookie);
 return cookie;
public void unlock(long recNo, long cookie) throws SecurityException, RecordNotFoundException
 int a = (int)recNo;
 if( a >= vecrecord.size()) throw new RecordNotFoundException();
 OneRecord one = ((OneRecord)(vecrecord.elementAt(a)));
 if( one == null) throw new RecordNotFoundException();
 synchronized(one)
 if(one.isLocked())
 if(one.getCookie() != cookie) throw new SecurityException();
 one.setCookie(0L);
 one.notify();
 } Edited by: KIMJINHO on Sep 8, 2008 1:56 PM

I did not really understand but you should call wait inside of a loop.
As the api for Object.wait says:
* As in the one argument version, interrupts and spurious wakeups are
* possible, and this method should always be used in a loopI hope this helps
Additionally you should not catch an Exception without doing anything. At least log it or write it to the console.
Edited by: Domi27 on Sep 8, 2008 4:18 PM

Num lock problem - Keeps flashing

I've got a num lock problem on my new Macbook at the moment. It keeps on flashing randomly, even when I don't use it. And when I press it when the led isn't on, it doesn't do anythin. Any ideas what might be wrong?

I don't think it is serious enough to return it. I have problems with my num lock and caps lock keys also, but I think it is a problem with the PMU firmware. Quite a few people are having an issue, so I don't think it is a hardware problem.
There are also people having other problems related to the PMU, such as the coloured lines at startup. I suspect we will see a firmware update at some point that can hopefully fix it.
My advice would be try resetting your PRAM with command-option-p-r at startup (until you hear the second chime). Or resetting the PMU by turning off the 'book. disconnecting power and taking battery out, then pressing power button for 5 seconds. Then turn it all back on again and it should be ok.
Stay away from 10.4.7 too, it's just trouble.

Urgent :conversion lock problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for