Urgent--Error in MIRO reversal

Hi
While doing MIRO reversal system giving me error as "Error in account determination for VSE CAIN"
CAIN is my chart of accounts an VSE is transaction key for higher education cess.
I checked in VSE ,G/L is there.
Then I made Dr and Cr for same G/L in VSE.
Then system giving me error as "Balance is not zero."
What will be the reason?
How to solve this problem?
Its urgent pl?
Points sure for any help.

Enter the balance amount in the amount filed then you will not see this error.

Similar Messages

  • Error in MIRO Reversal - MR8M

    Hi Experts,
    User is getting the error while reversing the MIRO entry using T-code -  MR8M
    "Company Code / Cost Center number CTR belongs to business area BA1 not BA2".
    I checked in ME23N and MIR4. In both the T-codes correct Business Area is used i.e. the BA2.
    Please help where else I could look for the assignment of business area.
    Thanks

    Hi:
            Please check out which business area has been maintained in your cost center master data in KS03 as being used in your transaction. It is quite possible that before reversal the cost center assignment has been changed between invocie posting date and its reversal date.
    Regards

  • Why miro reversal is not showing reference of original miro.

    Dear experts
    Why miro reversal is not showing reference of original miro. There is any provision for in system for that?/
    regds
    sachin

    Hi Sachin,
    While MIRO Reversing through MR8M Transaction code only.
    Where you should Enter the MM- Document Number (Not for FB03- FI Document Number)
    Check before Reversing the MIRO Document in MIR3.
    If the Above answers are correct Which type of Error comming let clarify.
    Regards,
    Kishore K

  • Miro Reversal and GR IR Clearing

    Dear Friends,
    Once Migo and Miro is done and subsequently the miro is reversed while doing auto clearing of GR IR Account, the system is knocking off the original migo and the original miro and leaving the reversed miro as open item instead of clearing the original miro against the reversal miro.
    Is this a standard functionality due to cenvat issues or is there some other problem.
    Please advice how to take care of the same.
    Regards
    Mukesh

    This is standard only.
    When cenvat is there it should be very carefull at the time of MIRO and reversal of same in the same month.
    Manual clearing of MIRO & reversal of MIRO documents

  • Tax error in MIRO

    Hi,
    I am getting tax error in MIRO while posting transaction.  "tax amount must not be greater than the tax base" msg FF747.
    Invoice amount is 168.91(MIRO)
    PO amount is 55.17
    Tax amount is 113.74
    This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
    tax amount is greater than due to heavy import duty.  User wants to post greater tax amount than actual PO amount, could you please suggest how can it be possible to post in SAP, i am trying to post but i am getting above error.
    This error is coming due to Tax amount(113.74) is greater than PO (55.17) amount.
    Thanks,
    Sam.

    Hi Sam,
    I too have the same kind of scenario. The VAT value is more than the base amount. Please inform me the solution applied by you.
    Thanks in advance,
    Pravin.

  • Error in MIRO transaction

    hi,
       I am getting following error in MIRO transaction ....Can anybody please fix this ?
    "In company code 3000, the number range 51 is missing for the year 2008"
    Regards
    Vijay

    HI,
    Please check the nuber ranges whether that has been selected as external for the Invoicing.
    If external then please check whether the said no range starting from 51 is included in the external no assignment or no?
    If not then yiu may have to add the same no range and then check.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Prasanna
    Award pls if helpful.

  • Error In MIRO GL  account allows only output tax

    Hello All,
    We are facing an error in MIRO that GL account xxxxx allows only out put tax. The scinario & settings are as  below.
    FB60
    There is no error when using the particular tax code sytem posts the document
    MIRO
    Same vendor & tax code used as in FB60
    The systemshows an error that GL  ***** allows only output tax.
    TAX CODE settings in FTXP
    The GL showing error is in tax code
    GL settings
    In GL master data in control tab , the tax category is defined as out put tax
    QUERY
    Why in FB60 it allows the GL & not in MIRO ( Both are vendor invoice and suppose to work in similar manner)
    please note in both the cases the entries are same
    Vendor Cr
    Expense / Stock Dr
    VAT GL **** Cr
    VAT GL-2 Dr
    VAT GL**** is not picking @ MIRO & Picks @ FB60 with out any error
    Any Idea !!!
    Thanks & Regards
    Arun R

    Hi,
    The problem is resolved .
    The error was due to the fact that the VAT was an aquisiton tax for europe.
    The details are in note  373587
    Thanks for the support
    Regards
    Arun

  • CO OBJECT ERROR IN MIRO FOR UNPLANNED DEL COST

    Dear Friends
    I m facing one error in MIRO can u guide me in that context.
    well in MIRO i m postin Unplanned deliver cost.......and it is asking me assignment to this G/L for Cost center object..
    ERROR: Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object
    ..I have already assigned the Cost center for the G/l in OKB9 is there anything else has to be done
    Actually we have 4 plants and 4 Business area i.e whenever i am doing any posting for BW01 -and Business Area BA01 My cost center BW01402 will get hit similarly for other plant and Business are Cost center has been assigned in OKB9 in Details per business Area,is it the right method or anything else has to be done.
    Actually in OKB9 i have maintained that GL and in Detail per business area i have maintained cost center per business area
    we have assigned the right Cost senter only i.e for different Plant and differenct business area we have asigned different cost center.
    Then y i m getting error i m not understanding..
    Please guide me in this context.
    Also i am trying other method of posting Freight (unplanned delviery cost ) as well as labour charge through ACTIVATING -"Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
    So that for particular G/L I can Debt or credit that account,in which will doing MIRO G/L Tab gets activated ,i m entering G/L and entering amount for freight and Labor is this the correct procedure.
    Regards
    shailesh

    I have already assigned this G/L as primary cost element in FS00 and in OKB9 also Cost center is assigned as per Business Area as mentioned in the thread
    i.e we have 4 plants and 4 business area so we assigned 4 cost centers to 4 business area, so whenver i m postin unplanned delivery cost for a particular plant then my GL should hit with proper cost center but still it is asking for CO OBJECT
    ERROR IS:
    "Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object"
    If i maintained the default Cost center in FS00 in cost element then it doesnt give error but my requirement is that for a particular plant ,and business are only cost area assigned to it should hit
    Any other solutions.
    Thankz and regards
    Shailesh

  • URGENT : Error: nca_connect_server: cannot communicate host ...on port....

    URGENT : Error: nca_connect_server: cannot communicate host ...on port....
    Platform :
    front end - Forms6i
    App Server - Oracle 9iAS
    Testing tool - Mercurry Load Runner 8.0
    Database - Oracle 9i
    Hi Gurus,
    I am trying to run a script in Load runner but its always coming out by following error message -
    vuser_init.c(63): Warning: ifError expired (5) during NCA handshake,
    vuser_init.c(63): Warning: ifError expired (5)
    vuser_init.c(63): Error: nca_connect_server: cannot communicate with host 202.46.209.42 on port 7778
    Abort was called from an action.
    forms url which used in test script is running fine without any error with same port, I am wondering why it is returning error with Load Runner ?
    Quick help on pinpointing the issue will be highly appreciated, Following is the Loadrunner script m using -
    vuser_init()
         web_set_max_html_param_len("1024");
         web_url("f6isrvl",
              "URL=http://202.46.209.42:7778/f6i/f6isrvl?config=devjp10_en",
              "Resource=0",
              "RecContentType=text/html",
              "Referer=",
              "Snapshot=t1.inf",
              "Mode=HTML",
              EXTRARES,
              "Url=../forms60java/f60web.jar", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              "Url=../forms60java/FImageBean.jar", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              "Url=../forms60java/images.jar", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              LAST);
         web_url("Registry.dat",
              "URL=http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/oracle/forms/registry/Registry.dat",
              "Resource=0",
              "RecContentType=text/plain",
              "Referer=",
              "Snapshot=t2.inf",
              "Mode=HTML",
              LAST);
         web_reg_save_param("NCAJServSessionId",
              "LB=",
              "RB=",
              "Search=Noresource",
              LAST);
         web_url("f6isrvl_2",
              "URL=http://202.46.209.42:7778/f6i/f6isrvl?config=devjp10_en&acceptLanguage=en-us&ifcmd=startsession",
              "Resource=0",
              "RecContentType=text/plain",
              "Referer=",
              "Snapshot=t3.inf",
              "Mode=HTML",
              EXTRARES,
              "Url=f6ilsnr/?JServSessionIdf6i=i7yjfl33c1.f45nez95eiGIpR1vp2TD/knGnluImQXHcALJmQ5Go6XNr3CSa30R&ifcmd=getinfo&ifhost=MILDH0417&ifip=10.81.6.127", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              "Url=../forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/OneDDataSourceListener.class", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              "Url=../forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/OneDDataSource.class", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              "Url=../forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/ArrayOneDDataSource.class", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              "Url=../forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/AbstractOneDDataSource.class", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              "Url=../forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/OneDDataSourceAdapter.class", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              "Url=../forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/OneDDataSourceEvent.class", "Referer=", ENDITEM,
              LAST);
         nca_set_connect_opt(SCALE_INFO, 8, 20);
         nca_set_connect_opt(REQUIRED_LIST, 0);
         nca_connect_server("202.46.209.42", "7778", "module=ulgprc_em_100_01_c.fmx userid=dbk/dbk@dbkls05 ORA_USER=devjp10 USR_LANG=ENG");
         nca_set_window("Login");
         nca_edit_set("27", "SSC");
         nca_obj_type("27", '\t', 0);
         nca_edit_set("30", lr_decrypt("44b61ad9b8d2295c3768adc952f4"));
         nca_button_press("32");
         nca_message_box_press("Forms", 2);
         nca_menu_select_item("SSC", "Lending;Underwriting");
         nca_set_window(" (Underwriting)(Pending Request : 0)");
         nca_button_set("386", 1);
         nca_menu_select_item(" (Underwriting)(Pending Request : 0)", "Edit;Exit");
         nca_set_window("SSC");
         nca_menu_select_item("SSC", "File;Exit");
         return 0;
    Execution Log
    Virtual User Script started
    Starting action vuser_init.
    vuser_init.c(12): web_set_max_html_param_len was successful      [MsgId: MMSG-26392]
    vuser_init.c(14): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/f60web.jar" (specified by argument number 9)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(14): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/FImageBean.jar" (specified by argument number 12)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(14): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/images.jar" (specified by argument number 15)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(14): web_url("f6isrvl") was successful, 1882891 body bytes, 1386 header bytes, 12 chunking overhead bytes      [MsgId: MMSG-26385]
    vuser_init.c(27): web_url("Registry.dat") was successful, 4117 body bytes, 367 header bytes      [MsgId: MMSG-26386]
    vuser_init.c(36): Registering web_reg_save_param was successful      [MsgId: MMSG-26390]
    vuser_init.c(42): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/f6i/f6ilsnr/?JServSessionIdf6i=i7yjfl33c1.f45nez95eiGIpR1vp2TD/knGnluImQXHcALJmQ5Go6XNr3CSa30R&ifcmd=getinfo&ifhost=MILDH0417&ifip=10.81.6.127" (specified by argument number 9)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(42): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/OneDDataSourceListener.class" (specified by argument number 12)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(42): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/OneDDataSource.class" (specified by argument number 15)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(42): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/ArrayOneDDataSource.class" (specified by argument number 18)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(42): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/AbstractOneDDataSource.class" (specified by argument number 21)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(42): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/OneDDataSourceAdapter.class" (specified by argument number 24)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(42): Downloading resource "http://202.46.209.42:7778/forms60java/oracle/ewt/dataSource/OneDDataSourceEvent.class" (specified by argument number 27)      [MsgId: MMSG-26577]
    vuser_init.c(42): Warning -26652: Response body length (96) does not match the Content-Length header specification (95) for "http://202.46.209.42:7778/f6i/f6isrvl?config=devjp10_en&acceptLanguage=en-us&ifcmd=startsession"      [MsgId: MWAR-26652]
    vuser_init.c(42): web_url("f6isrvl_2") highest severity level was "warning", 4459 body bytes, 3017 header bytes      [MsgId: MMSG-26388]
    vuser_init.c(59): nca_set_connect_opt("SCALE_INFO")
    vuser_init.c(61): nca_set_connect_opt("REQUIRED_LIST")
    vuser_init.c(63): Warning: ifError expired (5) during NCA handshake,
    vuser_init.c(63): Warning: ifError expired (5)
    vuser_init.c(63): Error: nca_connect_server: cannot communicate with host 202.46.209.42 on port 7778
    Abort was called from an action.
    TIA,
    Sheilesh

    Well, the obvious question is what does 'mail.wbe-pli.com' translate to on the machine?
    Does it translate to your public IP address, in which case your traffic has to go out through your router and come back in? In addition to not being ideal, that's also not supported by a number of different routers (they can't handle NAT traffic coming back in from the private network).
    In most cases the solution is to setup internal DNS so that your hostname maps to the internal address of your server, not the external one.
    In this case, though, you could also configure Mail.app to use 'localhost' for the mail server, rather than 'mail.wbe-pli.com'. That will enable it to talk to the server running on the local system.

  • Custom Miro Reversal

    Custom MIRO done and reversed in the same date & hitting PPV in the reversal document. both the Cusomt MIRO & reversal have same exchange rate. Why the PPV is hitting? Can anyone help on this?

    Dear Experts
    I have gone through these notes but these are applicable basically where there is a diff in exchange rate between MIGO and MIRO or where MIGO has taken place and there is a difference in amount of MIGO and MIRO.
    But when we do customs MIRO, no stock account or any P&L account gets hit. Its one liability account debit (Custom Clearing.....Dr) to another Liability Account (Customs Payable). GRN also has not taken place between posting of customs MIRO and its reversal.
    There is no change in exchange rate also at this point of time
    So why at the time of reversal a P&L account (price difference account) should be hit.
    Regards
    Sourabh

  • Message 8I 478 error at MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    We are facing a very strange problem with the message control 8I 478 as an error at MIRO with different behavior in different servers.
    In dev the same scenario with same message control the message is not triggering and taxes also calculating but in PRD the message is coming error.
    Scenario:
    PO-Dealer scenario--qty 100
    VL31N-100 qty
    J1IEX_C with MRP indicator for 100 qty(Mat type raw material)
    MIGO-90 qty
    Then again with J1IEX_P part 2 posted for 90 qty.
    doc status in tables J_1IGRXREF-posted,J_1IEXCDTL-in process,J_1IEXCHDR-in process.
    Now at MIRO in Dev server taxes are getting calculated with proper tax code and part 2 posting not yet done error is not appearing(8I-478).
    Same scenario in PRD at MIRO error part 2 posting not yet done is coming for 8I-478, message control are same in both the servers.
    Kindly suggest.
    Regards

    If the issue is not happening in DEV, then ask your MM / FI consultant to compare both DEV and PRD.  I feel, some MM/FI related setting is missing and hence the issue.
    You may also have a look at the following OSS notes
    Note 1535398 - 8I478 error when invoice is posted for service PO in MIRO
    Note 591587 - Message 8i478 appears even though Part II is posted
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Strange error in MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    I m facing a strange error in MIRO.
    I have created a PO in Co code A100 for vendor XYZ.
    The goods are received against this PO.
    But when the accounts payable accountant tried to book the invoice, he selected the PO, but the strange thing happened is Vendor ABC appeared.
    When I have created this PO for Vendor XYZ and done MIGO for this then why some different vendor ABC is appearing in MIR7 for the same PO.
    Why is this happening? pls giude me in which areas I need to look to reach to the root of this problem.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    go4S

    Hi Chandramohan, Mainpal
    Thanks for valuable replies.
    I have checked the Partner functions for both Vendors. Vendor ABC is not created as invoicing party for Vendor XYZ.
    I have even checked the company code, MIR7 is done for the same Co code for which the PO is created.
    Any more inputs will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    go4s

  • Postings during MIRO reversal

    Hi Gurus,
    I have created a PO with account assignment (GL).
    *During MIGO entries are:*
    Acct  Assignemnt(GL)   +
    GR/IR                         -
    *During MIRO:*
    GR/IR                        +
    Vendor                       -
    But during MIRO reversal via MR8M:
    Vendor                      +  (full amount)
    GR/IR                        -   (Partial)
    Acct Assignment(GL)   -   (Partial)
    Why it hits account assignment (GL) during MIRO reversal?
    Please throw some light.
    Karthi

    Thank you Srinivas.
    The entries are like this:
    MIGO:
    GR/IR                     100
    Cons. Account        100
    MIRO:
    GR/IR                     100
    Vendor A/c              100
    Reversal of MIRO:
    Vendor A/c             100
    GR/IR                      30
    Cons. Account         70
    Please clarify.
    Karthi
    Edited by: Karthi Paramas on Nov 6, 2008 10:07 AM

  • Error in MIRO:  FF744

    Hello Gurus-
    We are receiving an error in MIRO 'Jurisdiction codes 1400000000 and 1800000000 have different cash discount base control'
    In checking the forum, I found a similiar post and the solution to was to update OBCP but when I go to this transaction, there is nothing to update.
    We are on ECC 6.0 and on Vertex. 
    Any insight will be greatly appreciated!

    Hi,
    Check if your customizing is correctly set in transactions
    OB70, OBY6, OY01.
    Also review F1 online help of field 'Discount base amount is the net
    value' and notes 514938, 300253 and 872130.
    Additionally, review following comments:
    <1> if the flag of  Activate Plants Abroad is activated, then
    'Discount Base Net' in transaction OY01 for the concerned company code
    must be ticked, otherwise, system will use gross amount as cash discount
    base.
    <2>if the flag of  Activate Plants Abroad is not activated, then system
    will read settings in OB70, if 'Disc Base Nt' flag is set, then system
    will use net amount as "ash discount base".
    See also note 882132.
    I hope I could be of assistance.
    Regards,
    Fernando Evangelista

  • Cost center error in miro

    Hey experts... when the user is running miro .. he gets the error like cost element requires a co assignment(KI235)... we made a config for particular element in okb9 which is based on business area vise... but still its getting error in miro.. please help me solve the issue

    hey dev thankss for the reply... i am posting three screenshots

Maybe you are looking for