URGENT:LWF Node is missing: Function INUCD adition to INN1?

Dear Experts,
We have applied Support packages : BASIS - SAPKB62062 and
SAPKB62063
ABAP - SAPKA62062 and SAPKA62063
HR - SAPKE47045 to SAPKE47074
Now in spro LWF node is missing and system is showing an run time error.
I have gone through the SAP note 973398 and done the initial IMG
changes as per note but i couldn't able to do changes in Schema INN1 .
as per note it says:
"Schema changes:
In the standard payroll schema, the payroll
function INLWF is no longer used at sub schema INN1 to compute the LWF
contribution. Instead now payroll function INUCD is called with
appropriate parameters. The schema in all the clients should be
adjusted accordingly."
I tried to change existing INLWF with INUCD but system is asking for
parameter is required, can any one tell me how i can maintain the
parameter.
Thanks and Regards,
R.B.Paramshetty __.____._

Hi,
First find out the relevant Function Module from WE57 tcode.
After getting the FM , u see the sorce code mentionjed in the FM which will fill the relevant Segmnets.
Also check the code whtehr it fill the mandatory segment YMMSMBEW.
Mostly this logic is missing in that FM.
Rvert back if any issues,
Regards,
Naveen

Similar Messages

Please guide me:LWF NODE IS MISSING

Dear Experts,
We have applied new Support packages : BASIS - SAPKB62062 and
SAPKB62063 ABAP - SAPKA62062 and SAPKA62063
HR - SAPKE47045 to SAPKE47074
But in spro LWF (Labour Welfare Fund ) node was missing and system was
showing an run time error.
I have gone through the SAP note 973398 and done IMG changes in Tables
: V_7In0p_all, V_t7INU1, V_T7INU3 and (V_T7INU5)
BASE WAGE TYPE:Created base wage type by copying /140
SM30:
table V_512W_D maintained the processing class 20 with specification
3 for wage type basis and checked the cumulation class 40.
PE51:
I have edited the HR form and transferred the wage type
Schema Changes:
I have made changes to Schema IN00> INN1 we have delimited the old
LWF funaction INLWF and incerted new function as per sap note as
INUCD -
here i have maintained the parameter LWF, basis wagetype , -- and
01 (Universal grouping).
PCR Change : Sytem was throughing an error saying that "STOP: No rule
in key INCS******".
I have copied INCS and created ZNCS incerted basis wagetype init.
now while running payroll error is not there,
but wage type is not appearing either in RT table or in payslip,
has any one come across LWF missing , what are the steps you have followed.
I am missing something.
Please guide me.
Thanks in advance
Paramshetty.

hiii,
Please find the screeshot.Differeniace is coming in the tax on totl income as after calculaton it should be arnd 19k,Please help.
I hope screenshots are clear to you.
Thanks

Obligatory node 'E1KONP' missing in the structure

Hi Experts,
I am extending cond_a04 idoc. am adding the custom segment as the child segment of E1KONH. Am populating the custom fields of this segment in an enhancement in LVKOEF01. This segment is populating and the idoc is successful but its not reaching PI side. In SM58 it shows status text as "Obligatory node 'E1KONP' missing in the structure" and the function module it shows in SM58 is "IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS". Am confused. When sent without this extended segment its reaching PI side. What might be the problem??

hi
they have imported and updated the idoc definition.
Problem solved.
Need to check the structure in IDX. structure in IDX was wrong. when changed this it is reaching PI.Thanks.
Regards
Sridevi S
Edited by: Sridevi Sivanandam on Aug 5, 2010 2:59 PM

Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1

Hello,
Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1 in the dunning PLD templates!!!
This Workaround is impossible.
As a workaround I suggest to store this information in the UDFs that you would create on the OCRD table that is exposed in the dunning PLD templates.

keine Antwort ist auch eine Antwort

Passing a node to Xquery function

Hi All,
I have two functions in my xquery. I'm trying to pass a node from one function to another function to check if it exists and do some processing on the text that is present in that node (if exists).
declare function appendLines($node as element()) as xs:string {
     if(fn:exists($node) and $node/text() ne "") then
          fn:concat($node/text(),", ")
     else (
appendLines($LINE_ITEM/ns0:STATXT)
Is the above call to that function is correct?
Thanks!!!

declare function appendLines($node as node()*) as xs:string {
          if(fn:exists($node)) then
               if(fn:string-length(fn:normalize-space($node/text())) > 0) then (
                    fn:concat($node/text(), " ")
               else (
          else (
It worked with the above function.

MISSING FUNCTIONALITY-The field "VatIdUnCmp" is not exposed in DI API & DTW

The field "VatIdUnCmp" (Unified Federal Tax ID) is not exposed by the
DI API and therefore not available in DTW.
This is a missing functionality.
In order to have this non-legal requirement, as request in the note 1028874, I send this development request
Thanks for your cooperation.
Fabio Fambrini

Maybe check here:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c5f5dbcc-0a01-0010-5d82-f25f2bee715e
HTH,
Frank

Packaging data is not saved in document draft (missing functionality)

Dear all,
Packaging data, usually typed with delivery note, is not saved together with Delivery Note draft (No matter the draft is saved manually or automatically by approval procedure).
I have tested on SBO 2005B latest patch, 2007B latest patch, and 8.8 version, they all do not save packaging data in draft.
The draft related tables for packaging (DRF7, DRF8) are already existed in SBO, I encourage to get this missing functionality back.
My customers are highly needed for this function for better operation flow.
It would be appreciated if this request could be implemented in the near future patch.
Thanks in advance

Have also just discovered that this functionality is missing, although we were going to be using it when saving an AR Invoice as Draft. This is a major hole and is going to cause a big issue for a current implementation where this method was going to be used to create 'Split Deliveries' without making the account postings and allow Despatch paperwork for the Shipping company to be printed. The solution was going to be extremely simple, but now potentially is going to result in a substantial SDK development.
It would be useful to know whether there is any likelihood that it will be resolved in the near future, i.e. in a patch for 2007A SP1 or 8.8.

Mail for Exchange Missing Functions E71 v E72

Hi All,
So I have been using an E71 with Mail for Exhcange for some time now and find it is very good.
However
I have an E72 with Mail for Exhcange already installed on the device BUT it clearly has missing functions whihc I had on the previous version on Mail fo Exchangeo n the E71.
These are
Comp Directory - Very useful for looking up contacts details from the GAB
View Log in Mail for Exchange. This is useful to see what the error is for a reason why the device may not be syncing with the MS Exchange Server.
Full resync in mail for Exchange. This again useful for support as other users will tell you that if the two systems have got their wires twisted, a full resync can fix the problem!
What version of the software do I have? Helps for future support and upgrades.
So Mr Nokia Software Developer. When can we have these functions added? Do we have to drop this software tool and device....
MODERATOR'S NOTE:
We have edited your post. Please be advised that feedback on Nokia devices are accepted in the forum provided that they are written in an acceptable manner such as tone and the choice of words.

As far as the version number goes - it's not a misprint, it's just they way Nokia numbering scheme works. build 2.09 is version 2.9. Similarly in Nokia Maps build 3.04 is called version 3.4... go figure.
Lumia 920, Lumia 800
Nokia N8-00 (NAM, Product Code: 059C8T6), Symbian Belle, Type RM-596, 111.030.0609
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic (NAM, Product Code: 0577454) Software v51.2.007, Type RM-428

Error: Obligatory node 'E1MAKTM' missing in the structure

Hello All
   I extended material master IDOC.
After extending, the segments look like this:
ZMATMAS05
     - E1MARAM
            - ZEXTENDED_SEGMENT
            - E1MARA1
            - E1MAKTM
            - E1MARCM
so on and so forth.
When I create idocs, I get a message saying that the message is successfully sent. When I see in SM58, I see the message "Obligatory node 'E1MAKTM' missing in the structure".
The idoc which is created has E1MAKTM segment, but it is still giving the error.   Am I extending at the wrong position?
Thanks
Naga

looking at this
ZMATMAS05
- E1MARAM
- ZEXTENDED_SEGMENT
- E1MARA1
- E1MAKTM
- E1MARCM
makes me just feel that all your segments are at the same level.
but usually the E1MAKTM is a sublevel to E1MARAM
so it should look like this:
ZMATMAS05
- E1MARAM
- -ZEXTENDED_SEGMENT
- -E1MARA1
- -E1MAKTM
- -E1MARCM
- - -E1MARDM

OWB bugs, missing functionality and the future of OWB

I'm working with OWB for some time now and there are a lot of rough edges to discover. Functionality and stability leave a lot to be desired. Here's a small and incomplete list of things that annoy me:
Some annoying OWB bugs (OWB 10g 10.1.0.2.0):
- The debugger doesn't display the output parameters of procedures called in pre-mapping processes (displays nothing, treats values as NULL). The mapping itself works fine though.
- When calling selfmade functions within an expression OWB precedes the function call with a constant "Functions." which prevents the function from being executed and results in an error message
- Occasionally OWB cannot open mappings and displays an error message (null pointer exception). In this case the mapping cannot be opened anymore.
- Occasionally when executing mappings OWB doesn't remember changes in mappings even when the changes were committed and deployed
- When using aggregators in mappings OWB scrambles the order of the output attributes
- The deployment of mappings sometimes doesn't work. After n retries it works without having changed anything in the mapping
- When recreating an external table directly after dropping the table OWB recreates the external table but always displays both an error message and a success message.
- In Key Lookups the screen always gets garbled when selecting an attribute as a join condition
- Usage of constants results in aborts in the debugger
- When you reconcile a table used in a key lookup the lookup condition sometimes changes. OWB seems to remember only the position of the lookup condition attribute but not the name.
- In the process of validating a mapping often changes in the mapping get lost and errors occur like 'Internal Errors' or 'Null Pointer Exceptions'.
- When you save the definition of external tables OWB always adds 2 whitespace columns to the beginning of all the lines following 'ORGANISATION EXTERNAL'. If you save a lot of external table definitions you get files with hundreds of leading whitespaces.
Poor or missing functionality:
- No logging on the level of single records possible. I'd like the possibility to see the status of each single record in each operator like using 'verbose data' in PowerCenter
- The order of the attributes cannot be changed. This really pisses me off expecially if operators like the aggregator scramble the order of attributes.
- No variables in expressions possible
- Almost unusable lookup functionality (no cascading lookups, no lookup overrides, no unconnected lookups, only equal condition in key lookups)
- No SQL overrides in soruces possible
- No mapplets, shared containers or any kind a reusable transformations
- No overview functionality for mappings. Often it's very hard to find a leftover operator in a big mapping.
- No copy function for attributes
- Printing functionality is completely useless
- No documentation functionality for mappings (reports)
- Debugger itself needs debugging
- It's very difficult to mark connections between attributes of different operations. It's almost impossible to mark a group of connections without marking connections you don't want to mark.
I really wonder which of the above bugs and mssing functionality 'Paris' will address. From what I read about 'Paris' not many if at all. If Oracle really wants to be a competitor (with regard to functionality) to Informatica, IBM/Ascential etc. they have a whole lot of work to do or purchase Informatica or another of the leading etl tool
vendors.
What do you think about OWB? Will it be a competitor for the leading etl tools or just a cheap database add on and become widely used like SAB BW not for reasons of technology or functionality but because it's cheap?
Looking forward to your opinions.
Jörg Menker

Thanks to you two for entertaining my thoughts so far. Let me respond to you latest comments.
Okay, lets not argue which one is better.. when a tool is there .. then there are some reasons to be there...But the points raised by Jorg and me are really very annoying. Overall I agree with both yours and Jorg's points (and I did not think it was an argument...merely sharing our observations with each other (;^)
The OWB tool is not as mature as Informatica. However, Informatica has no foothold in the database engine itself and as I mentioned earlier, is still "on the outside looking in..." The efficiency and power of set-based activity versus row-based activity is substantial.
Looking at it from another way lets take a look at Microstrategy as a way of observing a technical strategy for product development. Microstrategy focused on the internals (the engine) and developed it into the "heavy-lifting" tool in the industry. It did this primarily by leveraging the power of the backend...the database and the hosting server. For sheer brute force, it was champion of the day. It was less concerned with the pretty presentation and more concerned with getting the data out of the back-end so the user didn't have to sit there for a day and wait. Now they have begun to focus on the presentation part.
Likewise this seems to be the strategy that Oracle has used for OWB. It is designed around the database engine and leverages the power of the database to do its work. Informatica (probably because it needs to be all things to all people) has tended to view the technical offerings of the database engine as a secondary consideration in its architectural approach and has probably been forced to do so more now that Oracle has put themselves in direct competition with Informatica. To do otherwise would make their product too complex to maintain and more vendor-specific.
I am into the third data warehousing/data migration project and my previous two have been on Informatica (3 years on it).I respect your experience and your opinions...you are not a first timer. The tasks we have both had to solve and how we solved them with these tools are not necessarily the same. Could be similar in instances; could be quite different.
So the general tendency is to evaluate the tool and try to see how things that were needed to be done in my previous projects can be done with this tool. I am afraid to say .. I am still not sure how these can be implemented in OWB. The points raised by us are probably the fall out of this deficiency.One observation that I would make is that in my experience, calls to the procedural language in the database engine have tended to perform very poorly with Informatica. Informatica's scripting language is week. Therefore, if you do not have direct usability of a good, strong procedural language to tackle some complicated tasks, then you will be in a pickle when the solution is not well suited to a relational-based approach. Informatica wants you to do most things outside of the database (in the map primarily). It is how you implement the transformation logic. OWB is built entirely around the relational, procedural, and ETL components in the Oracle database engine. That is what the tool is all about.
If cost is the major factor for deciding a tool then OWB stands far ahead...Depends entirely on the client and the situation. I have implemented solutions for large companies and small companies. I don't use a table saw to cut cake and I don't use a pin knife to fall trees. Right tool for the right job.
...thats what most managers do .. without even looking how in turn by selecting such a tool they make the life tough for the developers.Been there many times. Few non-technical managers understand the process of tool evaluation and selection and the value a good process adds to the project. Nor do they understand the implications of making a bad choice (cost, productivity, maintainability).
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.If you are primarily a GUI-based implementer that is true. However, I have often found that when I have been brought in to fix performance problems with Informatica implementations that the primary problem is usually with the way that the developer implemented it. Too often I have found that the developer understands how to implement logic in the GUI component (the Designer/Maps and Sessions) with a complete lack of understanding of how all this activity will impact load performance (they don't understand how the database engine works.) For example, a strong feature in Informatica is the ability to override the default SQL statement generated by Informatica. This was a smart design decision on Informatica's part. I have frequently had to go into the "code" and fix bad joins, split up complex operations, and rip out convoluted logic to get the maps to perform within a reasonable load window. Too often these developers are only viewing the problem through the "window" of the tool. They are not stepping back and look at the problem in the context of the overall architecture. In part Informatica forces them to do this. Another possible factor is they probably don't know better.
"One tool...one solution"
Microstrategy until recently had been suffering from that same condition of not allowing the developer to create the actual query). OWB engineers need to rethink their strategy on overriding the SQL.
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.In some ways yes. If you do a head-to-head comparison of the GUI then yes. In other ways OWB is better (Informatica does not measure up when you compare it with all of the architectural features that the Oracle database engine offers). They need to fix the bugs and annoyances though.
.. but even the GUI of Informatica is better than OWB and gives the developer some satisfaction of working in it.Believe me I feel your pain. On the other hand, I have suffered from Informatica bugs. Ever do a port from one database eingine to another just to have it convert everything into multi-byte? Ever have it re-define your maps to parallel processing threads when you didn't ask it to?
Looking at the technical side of things I can give you one fine example ... there is no function in Oracle doing to_integer (to_number is there) but Informatica does that ... Hmm-m-m...sorry, I don't get the point.
The style of ETL approach of Informatica is far more appealing.I find it unnecessarily over-engineered.
OWB has two advantages : It is basically free of cost and it has a big brother in Oracle.
It is basically free of cost...When you are another "Microsoft", you can throw your weight around. The message for Informatica is "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bad decisions at the top.
Regards,
Dan Phillips

Missing Function Modules - EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS & READ_STAMP

Hi Gurus,
When i am generating EWA for system in Solution Manager, i am getting the error
under Service Preparation
- Missing Function Modules
1. EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS
2. READ_STAMP
*In the satellite system,tcode-sdccn*
Below are the errors:
1) EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS : no matching interface found
function module not found
EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS : funcname /SDF/MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS , module 000156
2) READ_RFC_LIST : # of imp params in funcmod < # of imp params in mod 000152
READ_RFC_LIST : inconsistency in # of imp params found for mod 000152
READ_RFC_LIST : non-default imp param IF_ANONYMIZE is not passed to mod 000152
READ_STAMP : no matching interface found
function module not found
READ_STAMP : funcname /BDL/READ_STAMP , module 000153
Can Anybody help me to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Ashok

The modules EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS, READ_STAMP and READ_RFC_LIST are supplied with the next version of ST-PI, which is currently scheduled to be released for customers on December 15. I can only ask you to ignore the error until after the next version of ST-PI has been installed on the system.
Please be informed that the errors are not critical and will disappear
by installing the latest ST-PI which will be release around december the
15th 2008.
Edited by: Felipe Pitta on Dec 2, 2008 12:22 PM

Obligatory node 'ZMAT_SPO' missing in the structure IDOC

Hello,
Scenario is : File - IDOC
I am trying to post the contents of the file into Matmas
The file gets picked and shows up a red color flag with the error : :Obligatory node 'ZMAT_SPO' missing in the structure Matmas04 Matmas04 "
I tried by disabling segment ZMAT_SPO, tried mapping to a constant.
nothing worked
When I copy the payload from moni, and do test in MM, its successful
What could be the problem?
thanks
nikhil.
Edited by: nikhil a on Jan 21, 2008 9:52 AM

Here is the error message:

<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = 8F7E3AA0C7FD11DC9E5600132165C741</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
I disabled that field in the course of MM in IR
do I need to reimport when i do this? i dont think so .....
nikhil

Camera Raw 6.6 missing functions

I use PSE 10 with Camera Raw 6.6. It appears to be missing functions such as the paint brush and the ability to mask. I've tried downloading it again, but the additional functions did not reappear. Any suggestions?

Masking is only available in conjunction with sharpening under the detail tab. Hold down the alt key whist dragging the making slider to see how sharpening will be applied to edges.
There is no adjustment brush tool available in the Elements version of camera raw. It’s only available in CS6 or Lightroom.

SQL Developer Tables Node is missing from when expand connection

Hi,
I'm getting this issue often when I expand the connection node (Oracle DB connection), the Tables node is missing from the object types tree. Even if i close the SQL developer and come back it would be the same.
Is this a known issue? I've seen this both in 3.0 & 3.1.
please advice.

Hi,
Just as an update: I did not encounter the issue anymore since my last post (ca 1 week) and I did not do any changes to sqldeveloper any more (never did an export / import of connections, no change in version of JDK any more etc.).
I guessed this here could be my issue: SQL Developer: Not able to view tables
excerpt: "The problem occurs when SQL Developer 3.0.04 connects to a limited privilege schema via a shared server connection. The workaround is to connect using a dedicated server connection."
I use type "Basic" for all my sqldeveloper connections, so no TNSnames.ora entries containing the line "SERVER=DEDICATED" and I did get same issue also when connection using a custom created user having the DBA role.
Therefore I guess this is here is more likely to be my issue: SQL Developer: Not able to view tables
excerpt "JDBC driver having to do with 'Out Of Band Breaks' - basically a low level TCP issue.
To enable the workaround, a Java system property needs to be set - oracle.net.disableOob=true. "
Very often when I did have the issue I closed SQLDeveloper and used Toad for the rest of the day (or a few hours). Next time launching SQLDeveloper the tables node usually was back again. So this could fit into the picture, right?

Missing function detour to the mode Drive/Walk for...

Hello
Nokia maps and Nokia Drive+ Beta for Lumia, missing function detour to the mode Drive/Walk. This feature allows you to calculate an alternative route.
Nokia Lumia 820
Rm 825
Firmware version : 8.0.10211.0
Product code : eu_europe_2_252
Imei : 354105053176656
Operator : Swisscom

So you have the files in two places now right???
Easy right click the top level Folders in the Library, select Update Folder Location and navigate to the Folder on the new drive. You will lose nothing. If you have reimported for some reason you will need to go back to an earlier back up catalog and use that to do what I have stated earlier.

URGENT:LWF Node is missing: Function INUCD adition to INN1?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for