Urgent: SPA122 with Cisco UCM

Hi all
one of our old ATA's is faulty, hence the only one that we could get hold of as replacement is SPA122 which we need to configure it urgently for security reasons.
I would to know if it is possible at all to manage/configure SPA122 via Cisco UCM? if yes, how so? any pointers?
Thank you very much in advance
Regards
Saman

Unfortunately Is not possible to install the new SPA122 remotely, using the UCM; This because a couple of steps during the installation requires that you be on site.
I send you the installation steps for a SPA122. Is not a link from the Cisco web site, but it is a good site that explains the installation instructions step by step by pictures.
http://www.callcentric.com/support/device/cisco/spa112-spa122
If this answer was satisfactory for you, please mark the question as Answered.
Thank you

Similar Messages

Cisco UCM with Third Party Contact Center Solution

Hi all, hope everyone is well.
Anyone out there running Cisco UCM with a third party contact center solution ? would love to hear your experience on this subject.
Thanks in advance !!
Danny

I have not heard of any sucessful stories, which vendor are you considering and what would you not go with UCCE/UCCX?
I used to work for Rockwell (Aspect today) which attempted to integrate their Business Contact Solution with CUCM (back on 3.3) and it worked OK for low volume calls, but never had any customer adoption.
I have not heard of any other known ACD vendors integrating with CUCM.
Chris

Cordless phones to work with Cisco SPA122

Hi there,
We have a customer site which has 10x Analogue handsets and some cordless phones running off an old pbx.
We are installing a new system including 10x SPA525's handsets but we need some cordless phones to run alongside them.
Can someone recommend cordless phones which will work with Cisco SPA122's please?

Any one?

DHCP with Cisco ap 1300

hi friends,
i want to use two dhcp pool with Cisco ap 1300 and each pool ip is associated with an ssid and a vlan.
is'it possible to do this configuration with Cisco ap 1300 ???
urgent
thanks

hi friend,
i do what you say but if i try to connect to vlan 2, my wireless card can't get ip address from dhcp pool v2.
plz see my config bellow:
ip subnet-zero
ip dhcp pool v1
network 1.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
default-router 1.0.0.254
ip dhcp pool v2
network 2.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
default-router 2.0.0.254
dot11 ssid ssid-vlan1
vlan 1
authentication open
dot11 ssid ssid-vlan2
vlan 2
authentication open
bridge irb
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
speed basic-1.0 basic-2.0 basic-5.5 6.0 9.0 basic-11.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0
54.0
station-role root access-point
l2-filter bridge-group-acl
interface Dot11Radio0.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
bridge-group 1 input-address-list 700
bridge-group 1 output-address-list 700
bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
no bridge-group 1 source-learning
no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface Dot11Radio0.2
encapsulation dot1Q 2
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 2
bridge-group 2 subscriber-loop-control
bridge-group 2 input-address-list 700
bridge-group 2 output-address-list 700
bridge-group 2 block-unknown-source
no bridge-group 2 source-learning
no bridge-group 2 unicast-flooding
bridge-group 2 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
hold-queue 80 in
interface FastEthernet0.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 input-address-list 700
bridge-group 1 output-address-list 700
no bridge-group 1 source-learning
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet0.2
encapsulation dot1Q 2
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 2
bridge-group 2 input-address-list 700
bridge-group 2 output-address-list 700
no bridge-group 2 source-learning
bridge-group 2 spanning-disabled
interface BVI1
ip address 1.0.0.100 255.0.0.0
no ip route-cache
interface BVI2
ip address 2.0.0.100 255.0.0.0
no ip route-cache
control-plane
bridge 1 route ip
end
regards,

DialPlan string for SPA122 with @sip-operator;uid/usr= ; pwd=

Hello!
Look this document:
ADMINISTRATION
GUIDE
Cisco SPA100 Series Phone Adapters
SPA112 and SPA122
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/csbpvga/spa100-200/admin_guide/SPA100_AG_OL-25117.pdf
Pages 95-96:
Example 1:
*1xxxxxxxxxx<:@fwdnat.pulver.com:5082;uid=jsmith;pwd=xy z
Example 2:
*1xxxxxxxxxx<:@fwd.pulver.com;nat;uid=jsmith;pwd=xyz
At first, I think, after that must be >
But it's not work.
Are You sure that SPA122 with actual soft/firmware - works correctly with @net uid= pwd= in DialPlan?
Read this http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/csbpvga/spa100-200/admin_guide/spa232d_ag_78-20305.pdf
ADMINISTRATION
GUIDE
Cisco SPA232D Mobility Enhanced Phone Adapter
Pages 116,207.
Examples like before but also:
<8,:1408>xxxxxxx<:@pstn.cisco.com:5061;usr=joe;pwd=joe_pwd;nat>
Here You see not only uid but also usr.
In other pdf for family like SPA122 device You also see uid or usr.
So uid= or usr= for SPA122?
Possible there must be ="..." like in some examples for some ATA-family manuals? Or without " " ?
So What string with @ and pwd in DialPlan is right for SPA122?
Or when You made firmware were it works correctly like engaged in documentation for SPA122?

Hi Name,
Thanks for letting us know about the errors in the ATA guides. The SPA1xx and SPA232D share the same/similar dialplan rules as the PAP2T, SPA2102, and SPA3012. It looks like an example was added that was not properly reviewed so I'll file a CDETS for each document and get the dialplan strings corrected.
A better description of the dialplan starts on page 43 in the Digit Sequences section of the http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/csbpvga/spa100-200/admin_guide/SPA100_AG_OL-25117.pdf guide.
To address the issues here:
SPA112 and SPA122
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/csbpvga/spa100-200/admin_guide/SPA100_AG_OL-25117.pdf
Pages 95-96:
Example 1:
*1xxxxxxxxxx<:@fwdnat.pulver.com:5082;uid=jsmith;pwd=xy z
Example 2:
*1xxxxxxxxxx<:@fwd.pulver.com;nat;uid=jsmith;pwd=xyz
Should be:
Example 1:
[comment: I believe that in the example, the author is trying to show that ";" is used as a delimeter between sequence elements but omitted to show the parenthesis around the dialplan and only showed one sequence so no "|" (pipe symbol) is shown. The author also appears to have forgotten the closing angle bracket ">" around the substitution sequence so I've corrected below.
See page 43 of the SPA1xx admin guide that you'd linked to for more details.]
(*1xxxxxxxxxx<:@fwdnat.pulver.com:5082;uid=jsmith;pwd=xyz>) [note: space is removed between y and z in xyz in the password]
The example is trying to show that if the user dials any number starting with "*", followed by "1" and any 10 other numbers, the entire dialed sequence is replaced with @fwdnat.pulver.com:5082;uid=jsmith;pwd=xyz [note: I'll test this and report back later]
Example 2:
similar comments and corrections as above
Thanks,
Patrick---

PoE auto switchover with Cisco 1252 Access Point.

Dear All
I have a network for Managed Wireless using Cisco. This is a new network for me.
I am in problem with Cisco Access Point 1252. My AP's are connected to a PoE Switch. And Cisco AP's are also connected Powered with also Power Adapter with UPS backup.
But problem is if I disconnect power source of AP Power Adapter , AP is not getting up with PoE. PoE is up only when POWER PLUG of AP ADAPTER is physically pulled out from Socket.
Question is if it is possible to make automatic Failover by PoE when Power source of AP ADAPTER is down ?? I mean no need to PULL OUT POWER PLUG of AP ADAPTER.
Waiting for your rely.
It is very urgent .
Thanking You
Subrun.

Hi Suburn,
1- yes it is possible to do failover without unlupping the cable of AC adapter. When power on ACS adapter is off, then the faiolver happens.
2- with regards to POE, if your switch supporting enhanced POE?
Powering the Aironet 1250 Series Access Point with Cisco Enhanced PoE
Cisco Enhanced PoE was designed for customers who want to install new PoE-enabled technologies that require greater than 15.4W per port to function at full capability, such as wireless technology based on the IEEE 802.11n standard. Cisco Enhanced PoE provides the full power requirements for dual-radio modules and eliminates the need to run an additional cabling drop or insert a separate power injector. Support for Enhanced PoE is currently available on a variety of Cisco Catalyst® switching platforms. For more information on Enhanced PoE, visit http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/switches/epoe.html.
Serge

Hi Team, I wuold like to know if you have any app to make Firefox OS working with cisco Call Manager 10.5. Something like Cisco Jabber for Android or iOS.

I'm interesting on buying a Firefox Smart Phone, but
I would like to know if are any app to install on Firefox OS smart phone in order to work with cisco call manager 10.5.
Something like Cisco Jabber for Android o iOS.
Thanks,

Hi Itech,
If Cisco Jabber has a webapp, or mobile version of their website available, you should technically be able to access it through Firefox OS.
You may also search Firefox Marketplace for an alternative solution:
* [https://marketplace.firefox.com/]
- Ralph

Issue with cisco acs 4.2.Users unable to login aaa client but after restarting group policy able to login

issue with cisco acs 4.2.Users unable to login aaa client but after restarting group policy able to login

issue with cisco acs 4.2.Users unable to login aaa client but after restarting group policy able to login

Directory Caching issue with Cisco Jabber client for Windows

Hi ,
I am facing cache issue with Cisco Jabber client for Windows. If I do any change related to modification or deletion of contacts in Active Directory/ Callmanager, it does not reflect in the Jabber. Because jabber takes the contacts from the locally stored cache file in the Windows system.
Every time I have to remove the cache file to overcome this issue, practically it's not possible to do the same with all the Widows users. As, if any employee leaves the company and still I can see his contact appears in the "Cisco Jabber client". I have not seen this issue with Android/Apple iOS.
Is there any automated way to remove the cache file?
Here is the detail of CUCM,Presence and Jabber.
CUCM version: 9.1.x
Presence : 9.1.X
Jabber : 10.5 and 10.6

Hello
On our environment we had to install a dedicated Microsoft Certificate Authority "just for Cisco Jabber usage" to house the
Network Device Enrollment Service.
Our certificate for the CUPS were generated on this Certification Authority too.
I discussed this certificate matter with my colleagues this afternoon and nobody seems to remember how these certificates were deployed into the
Enterprise Trust store for the users.
But I think they asked all 400 users to accept the 3 certificates by answering "yes" to the popup instead of using a script deployed by GPO...
I wish you success with that deployment and really hope you have a technical partner that *Knows* this subject.
Our partner left us alone with that unfortunately.
Florent
EDIT: If the "Certutil script method" works, please let me know. This could be useful in our own deployment.

Azure multiple site-to-site VPNs (dynamic gateway) with Cisco ASA devices

Hello
I've been experimenting with moving certain on-premise servers to Azure however they would need a site-to-site VPN link to our many branch sites e.g. monitoring of nodes.
The documentation says I need to configure a dynamic gateway to have multiple site-to-site VPNs. This is not a problem for our typical Cisco ISR's. However three of our key sites use Cisco ASA devices which are listed as 'Not Compatible' with dynamic routing.
So I am stuck...
What options are available to me? Is there any sort of tweak-configuration to make a Cisco ASA work with Azure and dynamic routing?
I was hoping Azure's VPN solution would be very flexible.
Thanks

Hello RTF_Admin,
1. Which is the Series of CISCO ASA device you are using?
Thank you for your interest in Windows Azure. The Dynamic routing is not supported for the Cisco ASA family of devices.
Unfortunately, a dynamic routing VPN gateway is required for Multi-Site VPN, VNet to VNet, and Point-to-Site.
However, you should be able to setup a site-to-site VPN with Cisco ASA 5505 series security appliance as demonstrated in this blog:
Step-By-Step: Create a Site-to-Site VPN between your network and Azure
http://blogs.technet.com/b/canitpro/archive/2013/10/09/step-by-step-create-a-site-to-site-vpn-between-your-network-and-azure.aspx
You can refer to this article for Cisco ASA templates for Static routing:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn133793.aspx
If your requirement is only for Multi-Site VPN then there is no option but to upgrade the device as Multisite VPN requires dyanmic routing and unfortunately there is no tweak or workaround due to hardware compatibility issue.
I hope that this information is helpful
Thanks,
Syed Irfan Hussain

Azure Site to Site VPN with Cisco ASA 5505

I have got Cisco ASA 5505 device (version 9.0(2)). And i cannot connect S2S with azure (azure network alway in "connecting" state). In my cisco log:
IP = 104.40.182.93, Keep-alives configured on but peer does not support keep-alives (type = None)
Group = 104.40.182.93, IP = 104.40.182.93, QM FSM error (P2 struct &0xcaaa2a38, mess id 0x1)!
Group = 104.40.182.93, IP = 104.40.182.93, Removing peer from correlator table failed, no match!
Group = 104.40.182.93, IP = 104.40.182.93,Overriding Initiator's IPSec rekeying duration from 102400000 to 4608000 Kbs
Group = 104.40.182.93, IP = 104.40.182.93, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
I have done all cisco s2s congiguration over standard wizard cos seems your script for 8.x version of asa only?
(Does azure support 9.x version of asa?)
How can i fix it?

Hi,
As of now, we do not have any scripts for Cisco ASA 9x series.
Thank you for your interest in Windows Azure. The Dynamic routing is not supported for the Cisco ASA family of devices.
Unfortunately, a dynamic routing VPN gateway is required for Multi-Site VPN, VNet to VNet, and Point-to-Site.
However, you should be able to setup a site-to-site VPN with Cisco ASA 5505 series security appliance as
demonstrated in this blog:
Step-By-Step: Create a Site-to-Site VPN between your network and Azure
http://blogs.technet.com/b/canitpro/archive/2013/10/09/step-by-step-create-a-site-to-site-vpn-between-your-network-and-azure.aspx
You can refer to this article for Cisco ASA templates for Static routing:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn133793.aspx
Did you download the VPN configuration file from the dashboard and copy the content of the configuration
file to the Command Line Interface of the Cisco ASDM application? It seems that there is no specified IP address in the access list part and maybe that is why the states message appeared.
According to the
Cisco ASA template, it should be similar to this:
access-list <RP_AccessList>
extended permit ip object-group
<RP_OnPremiseNetwork> object-group <RP_AzureNetwork>
nat (inside,outside) source static <RP_OnPremiseNetwork>
<RP_OnPremiseNetwork> destination static <RP_AzureNetwork>
<RP_AzureNetwork>
Based on my experience, to establish
IPSEC tunnel, you need to allow the ESP protocol and UDP Port 500. Please make sure that the
VPN device cannot be located behind a NAT. Besides, since Cisco ASA templates are not
compatible for dynamic routing, please make sure that you chose the static routing.
Since you configure the VPN device yourself, it's important that you would be familiar with the device and its configuration settings.
Hope this helps you.
Girish Prajwal

Adaptiva Software Distribution not working with Cisco APs in Local Mode

A worldwide customer would like to use a new Software distribution system called Adaptiva to replace SCCM within Windows environment. As far as I understand, Adaptiva is designed to work like a snowball system. A single PC at a remote side can be "infected" with new Software and will distribute the package to other PCs within the same IP-subnet, saving WAN bandwidth.
First tests are showing that it is working well with Cisco WLAN solution as long as we are using Flexconnect WLAN APs.
Customer locations with Local WLAN AP design create problems for this new software distribution method.
The WLAN-PCs can be reached from outside, but the establishment of the Client/Server-model between the WLAN Clients is not working. The Port used by this software for communication between clients in each WLAN subnet is UDP Port 34329.
Our WLCs are running at 7.4.130.0. The problem is appearing independently of AP Multicast settings or Broadcast Forwarding. Enabling Broadcast forwarding without Reboot did not improve the situation.
Global Multicast Mode and IGMP Snooping are also of no influence.
P2P Blocking Action is "Disabled" within the WLAN setup.
Who has any idea what might cause this communication problem between WLAN clients in Local Mode of APs ?
Thank You for answers
Wini

I can think of two solutions. You could 1: turn the "auto-lock" to never, so that your phone never sleeps. Or, you could 2: jailbreak your iPhone and install "insomnia". I wish we had the Cisco Mobile app. I usually use wifi/insomnia and turn data off at work since we have wireless pretty much everywhere...
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Ask the Expert: Scaling Data Center Networks with Cisco FabricPath

With Hatim Badr and Iqbal Syed
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about the Cisco FabricPath with Cisco technical support experts Hatim Badr and Iqbal Syed. Cisco FabricPath is a Cisco NX-OS Software innovation combining the plug-and-play simplicity of Ethernet with the reliability and scalability of Layer 3 routing. Cisco FabricPath uses many of the best characteristics of traditional Layer 2 and Layer 3 technologies, combining them into a new control-plane and data-plane implementation that combines the immediately operational "plug-and-play" deployment model of a bridged spanning-tree environment with the stability, re-convergence characteristics, and ability to use multiple parallel paths typical of a Layer 3 routed environment. The result is a scalable, flexible, and highly available Ethernet fabric suitable for even the most demanding data center environments. Using FabricPath, you can build highly scalable Layer 2 multipath networks without the Spanning Tree Protocol. Such networks are particularly suitable for large virtualization deployments, private clouds, and high-performance computing (HPC) environments.
This event will focus on technical support questions related to the benefits of Cisco FabricPath over STP or VPC based architectures, design options with FabricPath, migration to FabricPath from STP/VPC based networks and FabricPath design and implementation best practices.
Hatim Badr is a Solutions Architect for Cisco Advanced Services in Toronto, where he supports Cisco customers across Canada as a specialist in Data Center architecture, design, and optimization projects. He has more than 12 years of experience in the networking industry. He holds CCIE (#14847) in Routing & Switching, CCDP and Cisco Data Center certifications.
Iqbal Syed is a Technical Marketing Engineer for the Cisco Nexus 7000 Series of switches. He is responsible for product road-mapping and marketing the Nexus 7000 line of products with a focus on L2 technologies such as VPC & Cisco FabricPath and also helps customers with DC design and training. He also focuses on SP customers worldwide and helps promote N7K business within different SP segments. Syed has been with Cisco for more than 10 years, which includes experience in Cisco Advanced Services and the Cisco Technical Assistance Center. His experience ranges from reactive technical support to proactive engineering, design, and optimization. He holds CCIE (#24192) in Routing & Switching, CCDP, Cisco Data Center, and TOGAF (v9) certifications.
Remember to use the rating system to let Hatim and Iqbal know if you have received an adequate response.
They might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Data Center sub-community Unified Computing discussion forum shortly after the event. This event lasts through Dec 7, 2012.. Visit this support forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.

Hi Sarah,
Thank you for your question.
Spanning Tree Protocol is used to build a loop-free topology. Although Spanning Tree Protocol serves a critical function in these Layer 2 networks, it is also frequently the cause of a variety of problems, both operational and architectural.
One important aspect of Spanning Tree Protocol behavior is its inability to use parallel forwarding paths. Spanning Tree Protocol forms a forwarding tree, rooted at a single device, along which all data-plane traffic must flow. The addition of parallel paths serves as a redundancy mechanism, but adding more than one such path has little benefit because Spanning Tree Protocol blocks any additional paths
In addition, rooting the forwarding path at a single device results in suboptimal forwarding paths, as shown below, Although a direct connection may exist, it cannot be used because only one active forwarding path is allowed.
Virtual PortChannel (vPC) technology partially mitigates the limitations of Spanning Tree Protocol. vPC allows a single Ethernet device to connect simultaneously to two discrete Cisco Nexus switches while treating these parallel connections as a single logical PortChannel interface. The result is active-active forwarding paths and the removal of Spanning Tree Protocol blocked links, delivering an effective way to use two parallel paths in the typical Layer 2 topologies used with Spanning Tree Protocol.
vPC provides several benefits over a standard Spanning Tree Protocol such as elimination of blocker ports and both vPC switches can behave as active default gateway for first-hop redundancy protocols such as Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP): that is, traffic can be routed by either vPC peer switch.
At the same time, however, many of the overall design constraints of a Spanning Tree Protocol network remain even when you deploy vPC such as
1.     Although vPC provides active-active forwarding, only two active parallel paths are possible.
2.     vPC offers no means by which VLANs can be extended, a critical limitation of traditional Spanning Tree Protocol designs.
With Cisco FabricPath, you can create a flexible Ethernet fabric that eliminates many of the constraints of Spanning Tree Protocol. At the control plane, Cisco FabricPath uses a Shortest-Path First (SPF) routing protocol to determine reachability and selects the best path or paths to any given destination in the Cisco FabricPath domain. In addition, the Cisco FabricPath data plane introduces capabilities that help ensure that the network remains stable, and it provides scalable, hardware-based learning and forwarding capabilities not bound by software or CPU capacity.
Benefits of deploying an Ethernet fabric based on Cisco FabricPath include:
• Simplicity, reducing operating expenses
– Cisco FabricPath is extremely simple to configure. In fact, the only necessary configuration consists of distinguishing the core ports, which link the switches, from the edge ports, where end devices are attached. There is no need to tune any parameter to get an optimal configuration, and switch addresses are assigned automatically.
– A single control protocol is used for unicast forwarding, multicast forwarding, and VLAN pruning. The Cisco FabricPath solution requires less combined configuration than an equivalent Spanning Tree Protocol-based network, further reducing the overall management cost.
– A device that does not support Cisco FabricPath can be attached redundantly to two separate Cisco FabricPath bridges with enhanced virtual PortChannel (vPC+) technology, providing an easy migration path. Just like vPC, vPC+ relies on PortChannel technology to provide multipathing and redundancy without resorting to Spanning Tree Protocol.
Scalability based on proven technology
– Cisco FabricPath uses a control protocol built on top of the powerful Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (IS-IS) routing protocol, an industry standard that provides fast convergence and that has been proven to scale up to the largest service provider environments. Nevertheless, no specific knowledge of IS-IS is required in order to operate a Cisco FabricPath network.
– Loop prevention and mitigation is available in the data plane, helping ensure safe forwarding that cannot be matched by any transparent bridging technology. The Cisco FabricPath frames include a time-to-live (TTL) field similar to the one used in IP, and a Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) check is also applied.
• Efficiency and high performance
– Because equal-cost multipath (ECMP) can be used the data plane, the network can use all the links available between any two devices. The first-generation hardware supporting Cisco FabricPath can perform 16-way ECMP, which, when combined with 16-port 10-Gbps port channels, represents a potential bandwidth of 2.56 terabits per second (Tbps) between switches.
– Frames are forwarded along the shortest path to their destination, reducing the latency of the exchanges between end stations compared to a spanning tree-based solution.
    – MAC addresses are learned selectively at the edge, allowing to scale the network beyond the limits of the MAC addr

IPad and iPhone Intermittent WiFi with Cisco

I have around 35 iPhones and iPads that are at best intermittent with our internal wireless network. I have been working with Cisco for two days and they are unable to resolve the issue. The WiFi works perfectly with our notebooks so it is definetly narrowed down to the Apple hardware needing a special configuration other than the ones we have tried.
I am currently using a Cisco WLC2106 controller with 1142N access points. The dhcp is working. I can forget the network or turn off the WiFi and back on and get an assigned address. At first it took several minutes to populate but Cisco helped me resolve that first problem. The iPhones and iPads will get the private IP but will not allow it to go out on the Internet. I get a good association (WiFi indicator in top-left is full strength.) At times one iPad will connect and another will stop working. For example: yesterday I had my iPad, laptop, and iPhone while I was working with Cisco. All three were connected to the WiFi network with seperate IP's. The laptop never stopped working. My iPhone worked for a few minutes and then I left the office with my phone for about 20 miinutes. When I returned the iPad worked but my iPhone did not, even after making sure the iPhone reconnected and gave it more than 10 minutes and a reboot. I have configured 1 iPad1, 2 iPad2's, and four iPhone 4's. They are all intermittent and I have yet to figure out any formula for why one might work while the others stop. I have done resets on them, statically assigned ip's, and changed DNS settings. Again, the laptop never missed a beat while the iPads just come and go. The way I have been testing is through using a website in Safari on the iPad or iPhone to check the external IP to make sure it is our ISP and not using ATT 3G. I also check the App Store which also fails on WiFi. The WiFi works fine at home with my linksys router. I have tried changing the WiFi encryption from WPA2 to WEP and even disabled the security for testing. Even with no encryption the same result prevails. Maybe one out of five tries to connect works and it alternates between devices. If I didn't know any better I would think it was an IP conflict or a maximum connection limit somewhere.
Here is the general config:
Cisco based wireless using no encryption. I will eventaully need to go WPA2 but for troubleshooting I have tried it as open. I am not broadcasting SSID. I CAN connect to WiFi network and receive IP, Gateway, DNS, and Domain Name consistently. I CANNOT access the Internet consistently. This is a business network with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Routers, and Firewalls. Again, the laptops that connect using WiFi are working as intended,
Does Apple have publicly accessible engineers for these situations? I have left the case open with Cisco in order to provide as much information as possible to Apple.
Thanks for any suggestions.

Internally I am not blocking any traffic. I have over 100 other Windows devices, cameras and printers on this single subnet. I'm not using any other Apple hardware at this time so I'm not sure what the Bonjour will do for me that TCP/IP can't do. I am also not using Bonjour at either of the homes I have done other testing on.
One more tidbit. One of our goals is to use FaceTime between the iPads. I have successfully connected a few times between the devices but it's almost every time I connect two iPads to FaceTime they will not connect again. Without changing anything else on the WiFi or the Firewall I can come back the next day, reset the iPads, obtain Internet access and the FaceTime will work. Thanks gyrhead!

Coa issue with Cisco ISE 1.2

Hi, i am currently implementing webauth with Cisco ISE for self register, but i am having issue coa. I was able to get non-windows machine to work but with windows i can't push out the url redirection through coa. I have enabled debug and i can see ISE trying to push out the url redirection to the port, however the url was not show when i issue a show authentication session interface gi 1/0/x command. The only issue i can see from the debugging is that the interface failed authorization first then a success authorization right after. Again, the url redirection work on non-windows machine, i have even go as far as disable dot1x supplicant on windows and it still didnt fix the issue.
please see attachment for the debugging i had mention above. If anyone know or had this issue before please let me know how i can resolve this.

finally figured it out. redirection acl was mess up.

Urgent: SPA122 with Cisco UCM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for