Urgent :--------- Transfer Requirement creating for the delivery

Hi Gurus,
For a Delivery document Transfer Requirement and as well as Transfer Order is creating,
Based on Transfer Order picking was happening in the WMu2026 the PGI for the delivery and Billing properly is happening.
But Open Transfer Requirements are laying for each delivery document, here source is respective storage type and bins and destination storage type 916 and bin is delivery number.
Please suggest me how the it is happening where we did configuration mistake.
Regards
madhu

Hi,
I think you set TR creation indicator for IM mvt 601 (reference mvt) under SPRO > LE > WM > Interfaces > IM > Define Movement Types - LE-WM interface....
Please check it. If it is set delete it.
BR
Csaba

Similar Messages

  • Sales order cannot be created  for the delivery date before 20.10.2008

    when i create a sales order today (18102008) sales order cannot be created  for the delivery date before 20.10.2008
    how the system is checking the 2 days duration for delivery date - which table is having this duration days.
    is it dependent on sales order type.....
    actually i checkeup in V0V8 - even then i couldn't  solve this error when i am creating the sales order.
    Pls suggest

    Dear Selvamuthu
    In normal circumstances, you can create as many as sale orders as you can irrespective of delivery date, and system will not  prevent to create unless you apply some user exit for some reason.
    Check any user exit is applied for that sale document type where some logic would have been written in such a way that if stock is available, sale order can be created.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • What config is required to set up Transportaion planning for the delivery?

    Hi experts,
    I am trying create shipment for delivery.It not picking the delivery for shipment.I checked the status in delivery and Transportaion planning is not showing as 'A'.What config is required to set up TP for the delivery?
    Please advise

    please define your transportation planning point , shipment type
    u can define ur transportation planning point in IMG- enterprise structure - Logistics execution
    and shipment type u can define under IMG- Log Execution - shipment - define shipment types
    Maintain ur delivery type etc  relevant for transportation in
    IMG- logistic execution- shipments-maintain transportation relevance
    Pls do reward if this information is of helpful to you
    regards
    AMI

  • MIGO 101 -- create one transfer requirement (TR) for several GI postings

    Hi,
    here is a problem I want to solve:
    - When we are receiving our finished goods we do several (consecutive) postings, e.g. 2x50 for a total of 100.
    - The total (100) is managed in one batch.
    - Currently we get one transfer requirement (TR) for each GR posting
    - Instead we want to cumulate all quantities posted into one TR (in order to create one transfer order from it).
    Is there a standard SPRO setting for this?
    Is there a user exit for this?
    Thanks for any hints / ideas.
    Andreas

    The problem was resolved.
    Thanks in advance

  • Depot Sales - Goods issue not done for the delivery

    Hello Experts,
    I am trying to capture a Excise Invoice in the Depot Sales Process TCode - J1IJ.
    I am getting the follwoing message - GI not done for the Delivery.
    Process which we are following here is
    Depot
    SO - Delivery - Picking - Packing - J1IJ - Shipment creation - Shipment Planning - Loading Start - Shipment Start (Will do PGI) - Shipment end (Will create invoice & Excise Invoice).
    Excise invoice is captured during MIGO at Depot.
    Can you please suggest..
    Thanks & regards
    Mahesh

    Hi mahesh
    Change the process to following manner
    Depot
    SO - Delivery - Picking - Packing - Shipment creation - Shipment Planning - Loading Start - Shipment Start (Will do PGI) - Shipment end -J1IJ(Will create invoice & Excise Invoice).
    u r problem will be solved.
    Regards
    kedasu.a

  • Error in VF01-Proforma invoice alredy existed for the delivery

    Hello All.
    We had a problem with VF01. When entering the delivery and pressing enter we are getting the problem Proforma invoice already existed for the delivery.
    From 4 Scheduling agreements(LZ) one delivery(LF) created, picked and packed. Before PGI user made proforma invoice F8.
    It created with out error.
    After that user done the PGI and tried to create the invoice but the system is thronging above mentioned error.
    Please advise use what would be the problem.
    Thanks and Regards
    SASi

    Hi Sasi
    Check wheather any batch job is running in background for creating billing documents.If it is working fine then  check wheather any enhancement has been done.
    Regards
    Srinath

  • How to enter a specific vendor for  the delivery costs in purchasing order?

    Now I want to create a purchasing order including planned deliver costs such as Freight, Coustoms ect, as the vendor of such planned deliver costs is different from the goods supplier, then How to enter a specific vendor for  the delivery costs in purchasing order? That means the partner for invoice partner will be two vendors at least in one purchasing order. thanks very much.
    <i>
    <b>No one would like to answer this question?</b></i>
    Message was edited by:
            King Qi

    hi, 
    You can have vendor at each condition record level.
    try it out.
    cheers
    Rav

  • SHAREid - A local user session could not be created for the assertion

    Problem: We have a client trying to federate to our environment using POST profile but we are getting the following error, "RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion".
    I verified that the user exist in the directory and I am able to execute a test successfully as that user.
    Thanks.

    There is a requirement that the client needs to send an attribute called "traveler" in the assertion. We found out that the problem occurs only when client sends a attribute in the assertion. When the assertion does not include the attribute, there is no issue. Not sure why that is the case as we have other clients sending the same attribute in the assertion.
    Here is the AttributeStatement.
    <saml:AttributeStatement xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><saml:Subject><saml:NameIdentifier Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified">XXXXXX</saml:NameIdentifier></saml:Subject><saml:Attribute AttributeName="XXXID" AttributeNamespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/claims"><saml:AttributeValue>XXXXX</saml:AttributeValue></saml:Attribute></saml:AttributeStatement>
    It does not have <saml:SubjectConfirmation> and <ConfirmationMethod> element. Can that be a problem?
    Thanks,
    Vinay
    Edited by: user504421 on Jul 9, 2009 2:17 PM

  • Where to see activities, which are created for the campaign with target group

    Hi
    I have created a Communication Method in SPRO -> CRM -> Marketing -> Marketing Planning & Campaign Management -> Campaign Executtion - Define Communication Method : Activity has been configured
    Activities are not appearing after creation of campaign with target group.
    Where to see activities, which are created for the campaign with target group?
    Regards
    Hamid

    Hello,
    alternatively to check  table CRMD_ORDERADM_H directly you can use the related transactions search for the campaign:
    This should bring all activities generated by the campaign. If this is empty first check the job log of the campaign execution job again:
    This gives information if any target group members have business transactions created. If the log does not contain the required information you can debug from SM37. The business transactions (activities, leads, sales orders) are generated from function module CRM_MKTTGGRP_PROC_CREATE.
    best regards,
    Johannes

  • Purchase order number for the Delivery

    How do we get the Purchase order number from a delivery.
    Hello all
    Say i have an Purchase order [EKKO] and from that i have created a delivery.[LIKS]
    In my output for the delivery, i need the preceeding document number for the delivery which is the PO number.
    How do i get the same. what table should i look in. I checked the VBFA table, but i am not able to get the same there...
    is there any table with which we can get this info.
    thanks and Regards,
    Gauravjit.

    No, it will be at the line item level because you can potentially combine several PO (or sales order) line items into one delivery.

  • Missing items in the IDoc for the delivery

    Hi to all,
    Sorry if not posting in the right forum.
    In my customer's scenario, an IDoc is created against a delivery (via the delivery output), and sent via ALE to a distant warehouse system, for picking and GI posting (basic type SHPMNT03).
    For some times, the IDoc created against deliveries including BOMs is missing the main item of the BOM (though the BOM main item is in the delivery).
    Consequently, the integration in the distant system is failing, because the higher-level item referenced in the BOM sub-items is missing.
    Surprisingly, re-triggering the delivery output does re-generate a complete IDoc, where the segment for the main item is back.
    I looked almost everywhere, did many searches in OSS (on SHPMNT03, on HIPOS, on E1ELD24 - segment name in the IDoc -, on "Missing items in the IDoc for the delivery", etc...), I even simply googled the web, but I can't even figure out what is the cause for this (I imagined it could be caused by a missing commit in the program generating the IDoc, but don't know whether this make sense).
    Any help would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance and best regards
    Yan
    Edited by: Yan Loiseau on Jul 8, 2010 12:52 PM
    Edited by: Yan Loiseau on Jul 8, 2010 12:56 PM

    Hello Yan
    Jelena is right, you are better off taking it up with SAP. I also did not find any relevant OSS notes.
    However the issue, according to my reading, is in the following areas:
    1) LV56KF05: INCLUDE LV56KF62 .  " FILL_E1EDL24"
    This fills the EIEDL24 segment, may be the main item is filled  initially and overwritten later.
    2) Function Module: IDOC_OUTPUT_DELVRY
    You can look at the following OSS notes (though not fully relevant)  for some clues:
    810981 - Reference data missing in DESADV IDoc from decentralized WMS
    537470 - BOM + batch split in decentralized WMS, confirmation fails
    752921 - VL563: Higher-level item does not exist
    705086 - Higher-level item does not refer to existing item
    Hope this helps. Good luck.

  • Foreign key cannot be created for the selected field A907-MWSKZ

    Dear Guru's,
    I am having the requirement for creation of access sequence having country/Plant/vendor/tax code but during creation of condition table i am getting the error as
    Foreign key cannot be created for the selected field A907-MWSKZ.
    Anything i am missing please let me know.
    Regards,
    Umesh

    Hi Umesh,
    Actually i am also facing exactly the same problem as mentioned by you that is "Foreign key cannot be created for the selected field A769-MWSKZ ".
    I think you found some solution regarding this..can you please help me to solve it.
    Looking forward for your prompt reply..
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sandeep Sharma

  • Not picking the stock for the delivery

    Dear friends,
    Though the stock is available, it is not getting picked for the delivery.
    Can you guide me what are the things I should check to solve the issue.
    With regards,
    Atul

    Hi,
    If the picking tab is grayed use T.Code LT03.( IF ware house management is activated).Here fill the ware house number and plant and mention the delivery note number also. Now use The T.Code TCode VL02N here u can see the system automatically picks the required quantity.
    If the picking tab is not in gray mode mention the storage location and the plant correctly. Even though the system is not picking the quantity check the Picking location determination with rule MALA.and also check any open orders are crated for the particular material .
    regards,
    vas.
    Message was edited by:
            v.s.vas.

  • Error!! Can not find the delivery details for the delivery Id :

    hi all,
    I have a report which i need to burst in seven different reports wherein my delivery key is column "emp_id". Now when i schedule the report to burst then the report completes with a warning. I see that there are various delivery cycles for the report and for one of the cycles i get the following message
    Error!! Can not find the delivery details for the delivery Id :
    hence, what happens due to this is, even there are successful deliveries for other delivery ids but then i get only two rows of data in each of the seven bursted ouput xls files. wheareas the data runs in thousands of rows for each cycle.
    Hence whats happening is, that due to error /warning in one of the delivery cycles other reports are also not showing data.
    I am not sure whats causing the issue and why i am not getting complete bursted files out.
    Please suggest
    Thanks
    Ronny

    I guess, you are in 10.1.3.3.2 :),
    in the latest release 10.1.3.4.1, there are more enhancement wrto bursting and performance i believe.
    check th release notes
    can you send me the xml and bursting query you have, i can try simulating in my local.

  • COREid Federation Error: A local user session could not be created for the

    Hi,
    I installed two instances of COREid Federation in my machine. Also installed SiteMinder and LDAP. Source Domain of COREid (8101) uses LDAP as IdMBridge and Destination Domain (9101) uses SiteMinder as IdMBridge. I am trying to access the resource protected by the SiteMinder from the source domain using the URL which is constructed using the pattern given in the PDF:
    http://mymachine.domain.com:8101/shareid/saml/ObSAMLTransferService?DOMAIN=DestinationDomain&method=POST&TARGET=http://mymachine.domain.com:8887/Source/Source.html
    Assertions are generated and I can see the assertion in the Source domain and transferred to the Destination Domain.
    I get the following error in the Destination Domain Shareid Log file:
    ERROR - [http10113-Processor3] - RECEIVER: ERROR: A local user session could not be created for the assertion
    Please help me to solve this issue?
    Note: The Web agent runs on the web server instance 8887.
    SiteMinder is able to protect the resource when accessed.

    Typically that error occurs when the destinations access management system can't find the user based on the SAML attribute. Check to make sure that the attribute that you are matching on matches exactly.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there a way of getting all my songs from my iPod to my itunes, not just the purchased ones?

    Basically, our computer crashed not long ago, and since then we have had all the stuff from our old computer taken and put on the admin of a our new computer.  However, my music files seem to have disappeared, including the ones that were in Windows

  • Ipod Nano Restored, iTunes says its in recovery mode

    I have an ipod nano, and at first it wasn't recognized by itunes and found posts that addressed this issue. Problem was solved... Until I plugged the ipod back in itunes then gave a message saying "the ipod is in recovery please restore befor eyou ca

  • Share iphoto library with 2 users

    Just updated to Lion v10.7 and I'm also running the latest version of iPhoto v9.1.5. I have 2 user accounts on the same mac min, with the iPhoto library located under users/shared folder. Assuming you only open one instance of iPhoto, all seems fine.

  • ITunes 7 - Problem getting calendar info to load on Nano

    Is anyone else having problems with the extra features? Before the iTunes 7 Update I was able to update Outlook calendar info on my Nano. Now all the previous info is gone and I can't get it back on. Does anyone have any answers? Dell Inspiron   Wind

  • Late 2008 Macbook Pro Screen Flickers?

    So I seem to have the problem that many other people have with the late 2008 Unibodies with the 9400m where the screen flickers every once in a while. I didnt pay attention before because it happened like once a week, but this morning it started happ